Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

The differences between Reform and Restore are vast. A party cannot represent the British people if it is filled with foreign people, faiths, and cultures that do not belong here. The price of admission to 10 Downing Street should not be appeasing imported “communities”. We should be able to...

Con_Tomlinson's profile picture

Connor Tomlinson

122,389 subscribers

61,790 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

This is NOT racism, its not cruel, its not bigotry it is FACT and we MUST put the British people first. It’s simply not fair and our priority must be the survival, safety and wellbeing of our own people! Its as simple as that. Restore Britain
0:31

This is NOT racism, its not cruel, its not bigotry it is FACT and we MUST put the British people first. It’s simply not fair and our priority must be the survival, safety and wellbeing of our own people! Its as simple as that. Restore Britain

Orla Minihane

22,642 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

It is a fantasy to think that Britain can accommodate alien, incompatible faiths and cultures just as it brokered peace between different Christian denominations. There are no “shared values” between peoples that can be appealed to, which produce a harmonious culture. You cannot treat Islam, Hinduism, or Sikhism like Protestantism and Catholicism. We should not have to forfeit parts of our national identity to encompass its antonyms. We shouldn’t shy away from saying that anything outside the bounds of our traditions should not be here.
4:29

It is a fantasy to think that Britain can accommodate alien, incompatible faiths and cultures just as it brokered peace between different Christian denominations. There are no “shared values” between peoples that can be appealed to, which produce a harmonious culture. You cannot treat Islam, Hinduism, or Sikhism like Protestantism and Catholicism. We should not have to forfeit parts of our national identity to encompass its antonyms. We shouldn’t shy away from saying that anything outside the bounds of our traditions should not be here.

Connor Tomlinson

14,788 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

The love of our own is not the hatred of others Europe should be for Europeans We have a duty and responsibility to preserve the culture and unique attributions of our people
0:29

The love of our own is not the hatred of others Europe should be for Europeans We have a duty and responsibility to preserve the culture and unique attributions of our people

Christian Ascania🌞

40,622 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Espaillat: ICE should not be in our communities. They should not be slamming people on the floor, and they certainly should not be at the airports. It’s going to disrupt the entire airline industry and people who want to travel to visit their families.
0:28

Espaillat: ICE should not be in our communities. They should not be slamming people on the floor, and they certainly should not be at the airports. It’s going to disrupt the entire airline industry and people who want to travel to visit their families.

Acyn

32,463 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

British people should not have to redefine our identity and make concessions to our culture to "make multiculturalism work." It's not our job to "integrate" people we never wanted here in the first place. If they don't like our way of life, they should leave.
0:59

British people should not have to redefine our identity and make concessions to our culture to "make multiculturalism work." It's not our job to "integrate" people we never wanted here in the first place. If they don't like our way of life, they should leave.

Connor Tomlinson

39,757 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

The most hateful, divisive, racist foreign Senator in Australia. This woman HATES White Australians & she’s made that very clear. People with incompatible ideologies should not be in our Government. Why are foreign people that represent foreign interests in the Australian Government?
1:02

The most hateful, divisive, racist foreign Senator in Australia. This woman HATES White Australians & she’s made that very clear. People with incompatible ideologies should not be in our Government. Why are foreign people that represent foreign interests in the Australian Government?

Lozzy B 🇦🇺𝕏

127,885 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Senator Bernie Moreno Says NY Socialists Should NOT Be SEATED in Congress, Demands BAN on Dual Citizens: 'They Cannot Uphold Their Oath...' "Every elected official since 1789 had to put their hand on the Bible, lift their right hand and swear allegience to the United States of America and to uphold our Constitution... Unless that person is willing to do that, then they are unable to receive that oath of office and should not be seated." We cannot have members of Congress who chant "Death to America", call for the "Total eradication of Western Civilization" and who use our nation's flag as a napkin. These people are incompatible with our country and cannot represent us.
4:04

Senator Bernie Moreno Says NY Socialists Should NOT Be SEATED in Congress, Demands BAN on Dual Citizens: 'They Cannot Uphold Their Oath...' "Every elected official since 1789 had to put their hand on the Bible, lift their right hand and swear allegience to the United States of America and to uphold our Constitution... Unless that person is willing to do that, then they are unable to receive that oath of office and should not be seated." We cannot have members of Congress who chant "Death to America", call for the "Total eradication of Western Civilization" and who use our nation's flag as a napkin. These people are incompatible with our country and cannot represent us.

Benny Johnson

180,237 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Our Message to all "Israeli Leaders do NOT represent the Jewish people." The Jewish people cannot be viewed through the lens of the Israeli Government. Merging Judaism and Zionism is antisemitism. We pray to GD for all the unrest to stabilize and peace to reign.
1:00

Our Message to all "Israeli Leaders do NOT represent the Jewish people." The Jewish people cannot be viewed through the lens of the Israeli Government. Merging Judaism and Zionism is antisemitism. We pray to GD for all the unrest to stabilize and peace to reign.

Voice of Rabbis

78,512 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Even one crime against British people by a foreigner who should not be in the country is one too many. Stop excusing it. Don’t gaslight us with “but British people commit crimes too.” No foreign barbarity against our people should be tolerated. Our immigration and border policies have clearly failed.
2:38

Even one crime against British people by a foreigner who should not be in the country is one too many. Stop excusing it. Don’t gaslight us with “but British people commit crimes too.” No foreign barbarity against our people should be tolerated. Our immigration and border policies have clearly failed.

Ben Habib

16,582 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

British people are White. It is our country and Restore Britain will not allow Reform UK or any other party to give it away.
1:03

British people are White. It is our country and Restore Britain will not allow Reform UK or any other party to give it away.

Orm

53,125 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Charities are helping people to break into our country - and making it harder to remove them. And in thousands of cases, taxpayers are footing the bill. The Government should not be funding charities that work to undermine the democratic will of the British people.
1:24

Charities are helping people to break into our country - and making it harder to remove them. And in thousands of cases, taxpayers are footing the bill. The Government should not be funding charities that work to undermine the democratic will of the British people.

Katie Lam

113,336 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Congressman Brandon Gill “The American people do not have any obligation, constitutionally or otherwise to import people from foreign cultures” Read that, and then read it again Constitutionally we do not have any obligation to accept any immigration “Our immigrate, the purpose of our immigration policy is to benefit the American people. There's no other reason it exists. We do not have any obligation to allow anybody to come into our country. We do so on our own terms and for the benefit of our own people, and to the extent that that is not benefiting the American people, I think it ought to be immigration policy ought to be reformed or scrapped.” I vote to completely scrap it. End immigration, unless it’s the very best. The only reason this mass immigration has happened is because we’ve been sold out
0:30

Congressman Brandon Gill “The American people do not have any obligation, constitutionally or otherwise to import people from foreign cultures” Read that, and then read it again Constitutionally we do not have any obligation to accept any immigration “Our immigrate, the purpose of our immigration policy is to benefit the American people. There's no other reason it exists. We do not have any obligation to allow anybody to come into our country. We do so on our own terms and for the benefit of our own people, and to the extent that that is not benefiting the American people, I think it ought to be immigration policy ought to be reformed or scrapped.” I vote to completely scrap it. End immigration, unless it’s the very best. The only reason this mass immigration has happened is because we’ve been sold out

Wall Street Apes

163,486 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Our government has imported hundreds of thousands of people from cultures that are not compatible with our own, and as a consequence, we now find ourselves needing to provide Uber drivers with basic instruction on sexual consent to prevent harassment of Australian women.
0:27

Our government has imported hundreds of thousands of people from cultures that are not compatible with our own, and as a consequence, we now find ourselves needing to provide Uber drivers with basic instruction on sexual consent to prevent harassment of Australian women.

Celina101

18,880 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

One thing is clear: the dismantling of our federal agencies and foreign affairs is making America less safe. And, the American people are NOT. HERE. FOR. IT. Listen to your communities and stand up—because real lives are on the line—and we will not abandon our people, our allies, or our humanity. Stay strong!
4:35

One thing is clear: the dismantling of our federal agencies and foreign affairs is making America less safe. And, the American people are NOT. HERE. FOR. IT. Listen to your communities and stand up—because real lives are on the line—and we will not abandon our people, our allies, or our humanity. Stay strong!

Rep. Melanie Stansbury

23,670 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Members of Congress should not be trading stocks, period. The American people should be confident that we are working for them, not our own pocketbooks.
0:25

Members of Congress should not be trading stocks, period. The American people should be confident that we are working for them, not our own pocketbooks.

Rep. Pramila Jayapal

20,470 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

The Constitution of Ireland begins not with government, but with the Nation—with the People themselves. That is not symbolism. That is authority. It is from the People that all power flows, and it is by our collective will that we established the Constitution as the supreme law of this State. Within it, we gave ourselves courts—not as instruments of control, but as guardians of liberty. Under Article 34, we vested those courts with a solemn duty: to protect and vindicate our personal rights. Those personal rights are not abstract ideas. They are expressly recognised and protected across the Constitution—beginning in Article 40, and extending through Articles 41, 42, 42A, 43, and 44. Together, they safeguard what it means to live freely and with dignity in Ireland: our personal liberty, our families, our children, our right to educate according to conscience, our private property, and our freedom of religion. These rights do not exist at the pleasure of the State. They do not depend on policy, preference, or administrative convenience. They are fundamental, and they are inalienable. What we are witnessing at this moment is something profoundly serious. A member of the Government—holding office as a Minister of State, an office that exists only by statute—has purported, through a statutory instrument, to prevent the People of Ireland from exercising their constitutional rights in their own courts. That cannot stand. No statutory instrument can override the Constitution. No minister, junior or otherwise, can suspend fundamental rights. No act of secondary legislation can lawfully obstruct access to the courts where those rights are vindicated. To suggest otherwise is not merely mistaken—it is constitutionally impossible. The courts do not belong to the executive. They do not belong to departments. They belong to the People, because the Constitution says so. And so, this is where the line is drawn. The Constitution is not optional. Fundamental rights are not negotiable. Access to justice is not a privilege to be rationed. Tomorrow, the law will be laid plainly before the Minister for Justice—not in defiance, but in fidelity to the Constitution; not in anger, but in duty to the People; not for personal grievance, but for the protection of all. Because if fundamental rights can be restrained today, they can be extinguished tomorrow. And if we do not stand now, we leave our children standing alone later. This is not about power. It is about principle. It is about ensuring that the Constitution lives—not on paper, but in practice. And it is about the furtherance of our fundamental rights, so that we may protect ourselves, our families, our children, the way we educate our children, our private property, and our religion—today, and for generations to come. #NoFeeOnGuarantee
1:14

The Constitution of Ireland begins not with government, but with the Nation—with the People themselves. That is not symbolism. That is authority. It is from the People that all power flows, and it is by our collective will that we established the Constitution as the supreme law of this State. Within it, we gave ourselves courts—not as instruments of control, but as guardians of liberty. Under Article 34, we vested those courts with a solemn duty: to protect and vindicate our personal rights. Those personal rights are not abstract ideas. They are expressly recognised and protected across the Constitution—beginning in Article 40, and extending through Articles 41, 42, 42A, 43, and 44. Together, they safeguard what it means to live freely and with dignity in Ireland: our personal liberty, our families, our children, our right to educate according to conscience, our private property, and our freedom of religion. These rights do not exist at the pleasure of the State. They do not depend on policy, preference, or administrative convenience. They are fundamental, and they are inalienable. What we are witnessing at this moment is something profoundly serious. A member of the Government—holding office as a Minister of State, an office that exists only by statute—has purported, through a statutory instrument, to prevent the People of Ireland from exercising their constitutional rights in their own courts. That cannot stand. No statutory instrument can override the Constitution. No minister, junior or otherwise, can suspend fundamental rights. No act of secondary legislation can lawfully obstruct access to the courts where those rights are vindicated. To suggest otherwise is not merely mistaken—it is constitutionally impossible. The courts do not belong to the executive. They do not belong to departments. They belong to the People, because the Constitution says so. And so, this is where the line is drawn. The Constitution is not optional. Fundamental rights are not negotiable. Access to justice is not a privilege to be rationed. Tomorrow, the law will be laid plainly before the Minister for Justice—not in defiance, but in fidelity to the Constitution; not in anger, but in duty to the People; not for personal grievance, but for the protection of all. Because if fundamental rights can be restrained today, they can be extinguished tomorrow. And if we do not stand now, we leave our children standing alone later. This is not about power. It is about principle. It is about ensuring that the Constitution lives—not on paper, but in practice. And it is about the furtherance of our fundamental rights, so that we may protect ourselves, our families, our children, the way we educate our children, our private property, and our religion—today, and for generations to come. #NoFeeOnGuarantee

Patrick McGreal

11,354 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce