Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

"[The DOD C19 jab] contracts...specified Moderna must test...for reproductive toxicity...the way they ran the experiments...&...the...push to inject pregnant women...tells me...they were...testing how many shots it take[s] to sterilize...I think they arrived at...btwn 5 &...10" This clip of retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art") is...

23,003 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Sense Receptor
Sense Receptor1 год назад

Full discussion:

Фото профиля TexasAllianceforLife
TexasAllianceforLife1 год назад

When TAL Public Policy Analyst Deirdre Cooper's unborn child was diagnosed with Trisomy 18, she never questioned whether to move forward with the pregnancy & birth. As she says, life is always the compassionate answer, even for the hard cases. Hear her & Bosco's full story here.

Фото профиля Sense Receptor
Sense Receptor1 год назад

Latypova's analysis here reminds me of Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla's Improvac boar "vaccines" that "suppress ovarian function" and act as a form of chemical castration. I have no idea if there is any link.

Фото профиля Sense Receptor
Sense Receptor1 год назад

Link to the paper on reduction of ovarian reserves referenced by Latypova:

Фото профиля Masfique Mehedi, Ph.D.
Masfique Mehedi, Ph.D.1 год назад

All have been talking after talking, but none dares ask for a public investigation into what went wrong and why with COVID-19. Without a public demand, nothing happens.

Фото профиля Jennie Want
Jennie Want1 год назад

@christo31816124 It’s truly devastating 😭

Фото профиля Becca
Becca1 год назад

Robert Malone developed mRNA for gene therapy, he didn’t work on Covid vax. He has been speaking out against this technology for COVID since day 1.

Фото профиля Daniel
Daniel1 год назад

Scary and evil. Were the Pfizer shots the same as Moderna? We had to get them because my son was going through cancer treatment and would not be treated if we didn’t do it. I have always worried that we didn’t have a choice and what may be inside us all now.

Фото профиля zombie cuckhold sheep
zombie cuckhold sheep1 год назад

Start em young

Фото профиля Gen Belisarius
Gen Belisarius1 год назад

"How many shots does it take to fully sterilize"

Похожие видео

"The [COVID] shots were coming from the DOD...They have a separate office [inside Moderna]. Only people with security clearance can go in that office. And [they] receive [the] active ingredients in bags. [Moderna doesn't] know what it is, [they] just mix it...and ship it out." Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art") describes for Neil Oliver (Neil Oliver) how the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) is ultimately responsible for much of the design and production of the COVID injections. Latypova says in this clip that the Pentagon put on several press conferences "where [they discussed] that they have their own mRNA products" and notes that the department even has its own separate office inside of Moderna, which is only accessible to those with the right security clearance. Incredibly, Latypova notes that the DOD provides the active ingredients for the injections to Moderna "in bags," which are then mixed in with lipid nanoparticles and shipped out. Those who do the mixing at Moderna have no idea what's inside of the bags. "Clearly, this is a government vaccine," Latypova says. ---------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "So yes, so the way this was done, ostensibly, they're saying HHS partnered with DOD, although, actually, they've been learning and figured out how why they partnered together. They partnered together to overcome their own respective limitations which was Legal limitations. Legal limitations established by Congress of what they can and cannot do. So to overcome those limitations, they combined their forces, HHS and DOD, to order mass order medical products and vaccines that were going to be distributed to the civilian population and would not be they would be under these EUA countermeasure frameworks, which absolves them of all regulatory requirements. And so separately, they couldn't do that. "So DoD could do it for themselves, but not for civilian population, not in mass. And for HHS to do that, it needed to go through regulatory approval, which this didn't. So they combined their forces. And then the Department of Defense gave this consortium, this public private consortium, dollars 50 billion dollars, just the first goal, to produce these shots. But the shots were coming from the DoD. So the DoD actually there are several Pentagon press releases or press conferences rather where they're discussing that they have their own product, their own mRNA product. "And so, and I'm also in touch with other, people who worked and currently work for Moderna. And they were saying, yeah, we have a separate office inside Moderna. This is in outside of Boston. They have a separate office, which is DOD only. Only people with security clearance can go in that office. And we receive active ingredient in bags. We don't know what it is, and we just mix it in with LNPs and ship it out. "DARPA and also NIH participated in this. So, specifically, NIH developed several vaccine candidates, transferred them to Moderna, the new product candidates, transferred them to Moderna right before 2020. There are documents for that too. And then as part of the R and D I also discussed this with RFK Jr. As part of the R and D program, which was very poorly done, but still there were some studies being done, NIH ran several studies several critical studies for Moderna. "So NIH themselves in their Vaccine Research Center ran those studies, gave reports to Moderna. And these reports have we still have very hard time to FOIA them. And it's in process. We're trying to FOIA them. But so and NIH also co owns investigational so there's an investigational number assigned to every new product in pharmaceutical R and D and FDA approval program. So NIH owns separate number for Moderna product in addition to Moderna owning another number. So there are two numbers for one product. One is owned by NIH. One is owned by Moderna. So clearly, this is a government vaccine."

Sense Receptor

145,720 просмотров • 1 год назад

Postpartum nurse/whistleblower Michelle Spencer: "After March of 2021, we started seeing...babies born dead...[it was] like 50 times more than...before...But the crazy part is babies are still dying...[the jabs were] designed this way...[babies'] bodies are still under attack." This clip of Spencer (Michelle Spencer) is taken from a discussion with with Mic Meow (Intentional w/ Mic Meow) and Dr. James Thorp (James Thorp MD), a board-certified obstetrician-gynecologist who has 44 years of obstetrical experience, posted to Rumble on July 31, 2025. NOTE: The audio scratches are inherent to the source video. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "I've been a postpartum nurse since 2020, and when I worked on the postpartum floor in 2020, it was not normal to see a baby born dead. And, on average, in 2020, and all the years prior, we would have, like, four babies born dead per year. So once 2021 came and the shots started rolling out, the pregnant. The COVID vaccine shots, they were given to the pregnant women when they'd go to their OB doctor at any gestation It was like within a week, those mothers were coming in to deliver their dead babies. "And it had appeared that they had just received the COVID vaccine, like, the week before. And, you know, five years have gone by, four years gone by. And I've had many friends who said, yeah, I was pregnant, and I'd go to my doctor and he would push the COVID vaccine. And a few of them, of course, said no. But, I mean, for most of the women that didn't know, they just trusted their doctor. They got the COVID vaccine. "And so after March of 2021, we started seeing these babies born dead. And looking back, it's. It was at a rate of four per week. So we used to have four per year, and then it became four per week. So that's like 50 times more than what it would have ever been before. "That's absolutely outrageous. And the crazy part about this is it's still happening. Every time I go to work, there is a dead baby being born. And it doesn't matter. The gestation women have all the way from very beginning to 39, 40 weeks gestation, their babies are passing away inside. And so, yeah, every time I go to work, there's a dead baby. "And, I have been speaking out since 2021 to whoever will hear me. I have been very loud. And in the first couple of years, the nurses didn't believe me, and now they finally believe me. They all know that, yes, vaccines are dangerous. I've opened their eyes to the COVID vaccine. I've opened their eyes to the hepatitis B vaccine, because that's another one that they give to the newborns. "You know, so the mothers get it in pregnancy. They get the COVID vaccine, and then they come to the hospital, and then all they want to do is shoot up their baby with all this stuff. And so I've told all the nurses all about the hepatitis B vaccine. Most of the nurses are not comfortable giving that shot to the newborns. And that's, I would like to think, partially because of me. "I mean, the crazy part is, is the COVID vaccine was primarily given in 2021 and 2022 and pushed on everybody for those two years. And then now, you know, people don't even talk about giving it hardly anymore. But the crazy part is the babies are still dying. So even though they received the shot in 2021, around there, they're still. They're getting pregnant and carrying a baby. "But as the baby develops and the placenta develops in the umbilical cord, there's,fFrom what Dr. Thorp's trailblazer, has told me, the little clots develop in these placentas, and so these babies will develop for however long, and then they end up becoming deprived of oxygen and they die inside. And it's. It's just. It's crazy because it was very— it was designed this way that they were attacked, and it's still. Four years later, their bodies are still under attack, and it's wrong."

Sense Receptor

17,897 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

💥BOMBSHELL PROOF THE COVID "VACCINE CLINICAL TRIALS" WERE A FARCE "There were... batches of Pfizer vaccine... manufactured... in June 2020... [they] contained ~30 million doses & those were very, very toxic... [&] they went on the market & they killed a whole bunch of people." This clip of retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art") is taken from a Flashlights podcast (Flashlights Podcast) posted to Rumble on July 2, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "They were going to launch them anyway. They pre-purchased the vaccines way before any of the reviewers ever seen any data. And also in the US I know for sure there were about 33 batches of Pfizer vaccine that was manufactured starting in June of 2020. So way before this November, or December timeline. So they started manufacturing them around June of 2020. "Those 33 batches were manufactured by end of November, 2020 and after the EUA authorization they were shipped commercially. So this and those batches contained around 30 million doses and those were very, very toxic. So that just proves that 30 million doses were sitting on the shelf and clinical trials had no impact on them whatsoever. It didn't matter. They were already made. "And after the paperwork was issued, they went on the market and they killed a whole bunch of people. They were very, very toxic. And by the way, those batches also in the expiration date because the government knows that these are outside of anything. These are just poisons made. So their expiration date is December 31st, 2069. They're labeled '69. 2069 is their expiration date of those 33 batches. "But that's not how you label expiration dates. It's just to say that these are completely outside of any norm of anything. And it's been FOIA'd, by ICAN, by Aaron Siri. They FOIA'd Pfizer shipment, detailed shipment information. "And I also worked with that to adjust my batch analysis. And that's where I saw. So I knew about these batches, I wrote about them, but they didn't have their expiration dates until they FOIA'd this data. And I looked at it and I'm like, oh, well...[and] nobody cared. Nobody cared. They were paid to inject people, they injected people, they collected their money, they injected themselves. A bunch of them are dead and injured and nobody cared."

Sense Receptor

20,642 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Latest from Sasha Latypova on C19-jab lot variability. (She was talking about this while Bob Malone was still pushing jabs on elderly—see tweet 2) "I was the 1st person [to identify] this...the elderly are a big target...because they're the claimants...[on] up to $150 trillion" This clip of Latypova (sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art"), a retired pharma R&D executive who has done extensive investigation into various matters surrounding COVID, including COVID-injection variability, is taken from an interview with Mark Bishofsky (TheTruthExpedition) posted the Truth Expedition Rumble channel on June 25, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "I was the first person who identified this, in 2021. And again I was immediately banned, censored everywhere, screamed at everyone, including very prominent freedom leaders, calling me a crank and that. No, no, no. All these vaccines are manufactured under good manufacturing practices. And I have 25 years of experience in pharma R&D. And I can tell you definitively looking at the data, none of this is CGMP, not even close. "And so, yeah, so some batches were especially early on. The batches were super toxic. So the first ones that were released between December and April of 2021. So December 2020 and April 2021 were the most lethal and the most toxic. Now they were also the highest utilization batches. So it's hard to do proper adjustment. But the, but the magnitude of variation was so high that even if we adjusted for the doses, they're still by far the most toxic ones. "And I think that was on purpose because they were targeted first at the elderly. And the elderly are a big target of this because they're the claimants on the unfunded liabilities of the US government that today counts up to 150 trillion. So government debt is 37 trillion. But unfunded liabilities which include pensions and Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid promised for all these people, puts it up to 150 trillion. That was their target. And because those were target, we need to protect the elderly. They released them first into the nursing homes, especially made them available. "They also created this huge, oh my God, there's a shortage. We just need to quickly vaccinate all the over 65 year olds. Then some of it also was targeted at healthcare workers. To me that says they knew that eventually people will realize that this is toxic and they'll have to back off on the toxicity. The first batches were the most poisonous. But then variability is still very high even with the, they sort of reduce the toxicity over time. But I think I, I think they just diluted dilute them more basically. "But the, also because these things are not produced to good manufacturing practices, the, the variability is all over the place. It's completely, you know, you just, you just don't know. And also under PREP act, as I said, the PREP act allows them to not comply with any pharmaceutical laws. So these products are EUA countermeasures. Under PREP Act, EUA countermeasures regardless of what the FDA says. "The FDA now claims they're fully approved. But people need to realize that in the US law, it says that EUA countermeasures can be adulterated, which means any kind of ingredients can go in there. They don't have to comply with labels. That's why the variability is like this. They don't have to comply with good manufacturing practices. No pharmaceutical laws apply to them, and they can be misbranded, which means you can lie about them. So the FDA is lying about them, the government is lying about them under all administrations, but they're not breaking the law. It's legal, you know, so that's, that's why. So that's why I'm saying, until this PREP act declaration is removed, nothing is, nothing has changed. They're continuing the same policy, they're continuing the same strategy."

Sense Receptor

34,659 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

"Know why they were so set on masking?... masking induces acidosis because you're re-inhaling your own CO2... and that triggers positives for PCR. That's the thing that PCR measures, is acidity levels... and they knew it." This clip of retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art") is taken from a recently posted interview with Feds for Freedom (Feds For Freedom). ----------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "Know why they were so set on masking? They were so, you know that masking was like one of the most important pillars of this whole thing? Because we just now finding out from another collaborator who's working on identifying all these PCR tests and so forth. "So masking induces acidosis because you're Re-inhaling your own CO2. In fact, it re-induces acidosis within like 30 minutes of masking. You re-inhale your own CO2 and depending on your own health status and vulnerability, age and so forth, and it's more prevalent in children and in elderly. You are going to get dehydrated and you're going to get acidified and your mouth and nose are going to get acidified. And that triggers positives for PCR. That's, that's the thing that PCR measures is acidity levels. "So that's how they were getting the, the, you know, that was their mechanism to, And it also can trigger, you know, in a vulnerable state and winter for some people, it can trigger the cold. So actually it is the mechanism to induce common cold. And also to undo it is to de- acidify quickly. So that's demonstrated in, in clinical studies. And so they knew it. And that was the mechanism to make people sick and also trigger false positives for those people who were not sick."

Sense Receptor

238,622 просмотров • 1 год назад

👽🔥 New Dylan - Biologics🔥👽 "There's things that I knew that these people were aware of, but even they would not say. One of those being biologics." ~DB "The agreement was that, if they died, that I run with it and just blow the whole thing up." ~DB Firsthand witnesses to the Legacy program, "would never come forward in a million years unless they were gonna die." ~DB "When I was still in government...I brought the people who worked on [the biological analysis of non-human bodies] to The Hill." ~Grusch ~ Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "Did you physically see photos? Did you physically see these documents?" Dylan Borland: "No, but because of how much was given to me in relay that the individuals that had relayed it, they were doing so because they were genuinely concerned for their life, because their careers were taken, their houses were broken into. I mean, computers taken, mailboxes gone through. And again, they knew what I was going through at this time. They had given me enough information, and the agreement was that, if they died, that I run with it and just blow the whole thing up." Corbell: "So he's got his firsthand experience of this tech, but then this is something George and I hear a lot. Which is, in the Legacy, when you're kind of put into the bad camp - you know, you're under scrutiny now - that there are these people that are threatening you, and you do feel afraid for your life. And we'll get to it, but there are some things that occurred to you as this gets kind of deeper and deeper with what's happening. "But just to be clear: So you're in a place where there's some sort of purgatory going on. Everybody has clearance, but they're in this sort of purgatory. You're in this sort of purgatory?" Borland: "A few of us, yep." Corbell: "And then, people directly involved in the Legacy program are afraid for their lives, so they're telling you so that at least somebody at their level can take that information if something bad happens to them?" Borland: "I think it was definitely that, but it was also, this is such an isolating, lonely experience, especially for young people to be exposed to the reality of this. If you already don't have the acknowledgement that it's a possibility, like if you're...I don't want to say closed minded. If you're an average Joe Blow going through life, and then all of a sudden this pops up on your radar, and you're seeing physical proof of it, you probably take a step back and go, 'whoa.' So you have that aspect, then these same people have that aspect of it, and they also have the aspect of their government destroying them." (In other words, people like us would be excited to see proof of what we all suspect. But someone new to the topic might freak out a bit.) George Knapp: "So they are going through the same thing you are." Borland "Exactly." Knapp: "Their clearances are in limbo, home break ins, threats..." Borland: "When I come into contact with these people, they had had to resign from their government position and take a contracting job for less money. They were, basically, blacklisted for six months. The only reason they ended up getting a job was because somebody on the Legacy program had hooked them up after six months. And they ended up where I was at, and they heard me talking all this stuff, and they're like, 'Oh, you ended up here too, buddy. So, uh, what the hell is going on here?' Knapp: "It's like the island of bad toys or something like that." Borland: "Yeah." Knapp: "You know, put them all in one basket." Borland: "After I saw what I saw, and I've experienced what I've experienced, I kind of...I think most of us have, taken the delve into all of this material (points toward a bookshelf full of what appear to be UFO books). And you're like, 'I know this is true, I know this is true, I know this is true. Who else is saying these true things? Who else is relaying information I know to be true, to try and make sense of your own life?' "Um, they were aware of what I was talking about. I don't know the capacity in which they were briefed in. There's things that I knew that these people were aware of, but even they would not say. Um, one of those being biologics." ~~~ (This is the best anecdote we have about government officials being briefed on bodies.) Joe Rogan: "When it comes to these...actual entities...do we have an understanding of how many of them we're talking about, and the variety of them?" Grusch: "There is a variety and we have a certain number of (laughs) different things... I talked to people who were familiar with the biological analysis of everything. So we have some idea, not a complete picture because it's like, you know, looking at it, it's like, well I don't even understand the physiology at all. It's like, what the heck? It's like, way different, right? So..." Rogan: "Is there a description of this physiology?" Grusch: "Yeah, no, I was in the room when uhhh... I gotta be careful, I don't wanna... I was in Washington, DC with a very number of senior people that work for members of Congress (Senate staffers seems like a safe bet ~Joe). Put it that way. When I was still in government. And I brought the people who worked on that stuff to The Hill. And this is why the members were so confident to put out the Schumer amendment and stuff. And, I was like, 'Please explain.' And they went into all those details and stuff. And I remember (laughs) some of the professional staff members were like, 'Whoa.' Like they were like, in G-Loc, right? Cause, I mean, and like, a total world bubble got burst right there for a lot of people." Source, with video... ~Back to Dylan~ Knapp: "You think there's a storehouse of that information that anybody would have put something away in case something bad happened to them? And do you know what happened to these people?" Borland: "You know the ones that I know still continue in the government. Um, I think they continue in classified-operations programs." Knapp: "They're not coming forward." Borland: "They would never come forward in a million years unless they were gonna die. And that's...it really sucks for me coming forward, because I only came forward because I sincerely believed they were going to die. Sucks."

Joe Murgia

61,078 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

PFIZER IS IN BIG TROUBLE. NEW interview with Kris Kobach, Attorney General for the State of Kansas, who is suing Pfizer, along with 5 x other American States. He mentions they knew 10% of women had miscarriages: "Pfizer was well aware of the many risks to pregnant women and they had information in their possession not only of of causing you know grave problems for pregnant rats but they also had information as early as February 2021 on 458 pregnant women and they knew that there were complications including miscarriages in over 10% of the cases" TRANSCRIPT FOR CLIP: NEWSMAX "You're suing Pfizer for misleading claims on the covid vaccine sir round of applause for you on this what's this about and what's your case" KRIS KOBACK "Well the case is that Pfizer violated the Kansas Consumer Protection Act and by the way all 50 states have some version of a consumer Protection act and while the federal government gave all the vaccine manufacturers immunity from normal tort suits, where someone who's injured would sue the company seeking damages for their injury, the federal government did not give the vaccine manufacturers license to misrepresent or state things that they knew to be false when trying to push their product, and that's what this lawsuit is about" "[Pfizer] made multiple misrepresentations, including saying it was safe for pregnant women, when Pfizer was well aware of the many risks to pregnant women. And they had information in their possession not only of of causing, you know grave problems for pregnant rats, but they also had information as early as February 2021 on 458 pregnant women and they knew that there were complications, including miscarriages in over 10% of the cases..... just think about that a person dies in every miscarriage and yet they proceeded to advertise it as safe for pregnant women". This lawsuit also highlights the amount of ignorance within other government departments, that are still pushing the "safe and effective" narrative on a Global scale. Add on top of the that the more recent accumulating evidence of DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna vials, and you have a ticking time bomb for the Pharmaceutical industry

Humanspective

548,504 просмотров • 1 год назад

"FDA was fully aware that these [COVID injections] would cause cancer, because they've written numerous guidance documents... [back in] 2015, 2013, even more recently than that...explaining to manufacturers who wanted to develop mRNA products that they need to study...cancer..." Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova ( sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art") describes for Dr. Drew (Dr. Drew) and Tom Renz (Tom Renz) how the FDA was "fully aware" that mRNA technology like that deployed in the COVID injections "would cause cancer." Latypova notes that the federal agency had written "numerous guidance documents" on the topic prior to COVID, dating back to 2013. "[T]his is a massive, massive crime and it needs to stop," Latypova tells Drew and Renz. She notes that the "FDA was fully aware that these things would cause cancer, because they've written numerous guidance documents, that's how they regulate industry. Two-thousand-fifteen, 2013, even more recently than that, they wrote extensive guidance documents explaining to manufacturers who wanted to develop mRNA products that they need to study...cancer..." The retired pharma executive adds that the FDA knew that products like the COVID injections could cause death, fertility issues, blindness, strokes, cardiovascular issues, etc. "They had this knowledge and they told manufacturers you have to study these risks and you have to exclude them and they were also not allowed to even study it in healthy volunteers because it was considered unethical," Latypova adds. "It was considered too dangerous. So then we come to 2020 [and] all of the sudden all of this is solved—this is a joke. To me, that's where I became extremely suspicious..." Putting a finer point on things, Latypova says the COVID-injection assault on the world is "a premeditated crime" and that "regulators knew" the damage they'd do. Furthermore, she says that "the military conducted this fake exercise to capture all these pharma companies and make them make these weapons."

Sense Receptor

181,661 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Former medical coder and whistleblower Zowe Smith explains how the Covid PCR "tests" were likely used to collect people's DNA and send said DNA to gene banks. This DNA, Smith hypothesizes, can now be used by Larry Ellison's Stargate program to create genome-tailored "vaccines." This clip of Smith (Zowe Smith), who is also the author of The Covid Code: My Life in the Thrill Kill Medical Cult, is taken from a conversation with Charlie Robinson (Macroaggressions Podcast with Charlie Robinson) posted to the Macroaggressions Rumble channel on December 3, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "Genetics is, you know, all basically eugenics. And so fast forward to 2020 when I started realizing, oh, there's these false positives with the test. And I knew that you didn't even need to have a test to be diagnosed with it. The doctors had to look at you and say, oh, I think you have Covid. So that's so smart that you were thinking, oh, it's gotta be a genetic screen. "Because at some point down the line, I've actually found documentation from the CDC that ordered every CLIA certified lab to send genetics, sequences to one of two different gene banks. G I S A I— G I S A I D. So GI SAID, or NCBI, one of those two gene banks. And it did say in the fine print, like, oh, these sequences for Covid. "But I asked David Rasnick, who I did an interview with, and he actually knew Kary Mullis and worked with Kary Mullis at one point, who invented PCR. And I asked him this specifically. I said, so obviously the PCR can run an entire DNA sequence. And here's this instruction. I showed him the document. I said, okay, they're sending these sequences and people are trolling me. You know, the Internet masses are commenting back saying, oh, no, that was just the sequence for Covid, for the variant of COVID because they had like six of them listed out. "And I asked him, do you think they're actually, like, after they run the PCR test and they get this sequence and then they have to send it to the gene bank, do you think they're actually spending the time to edit it and cut out just that section? Or do you think they're just sending the whole thing and then the gene bank can decide which section they want to take as their sequence? And he goes, they don't have the time to go in and edit all of that. I mean, they could, but most likely, no. Most likely they're just sending the whole thing. "Then the gene bank that, that they send it to, and he's shown evidence of how much DNA has been sent to these gene banks. They're tracking all of it carefully. So, yeah, that's absolutely what they're doing. Well, NCBI and GISAID, I haven't looked into who owns them, but there's another one that was creating PCR tests. And I believe that all of the PCR tests were doing the same thing, sending, genetic information back to some, some hive mind, whether that's NCBI or, you know, some other gene bank. "So it's generally the testing places that are, you know, having it send back. So there is the Human Genome Project in China, which is now, I forget the name, it's, it changed its name, but it's the biggest biotech company in China now. And they made PCR test kits, PCR and the IgG, which is the antibody test, and they send it to America. And who do you think is getting those results back? "So our DNA is going to some Chinese database. And even our own American military has flagged that gene bank as being a problem because they have all our individual information. And when you go to that gene bank and the other ones are really similar when you look at like why they exist and what they think they're doing with our DNA. Because I was really interested in why are they collecting all of this? They're obviously going to use it against us in some way. "So what is that? How do we get ahead of that or how do we stop it? And it says on the the one in China anyway. And the other ones basically say it and not in so clear terms that they are collecting our DNA because they need this massive amount population genomics so they can create vaccines and therapeutics or drugs, biologics tailored to our individual genome. "And then we have Larry Ellison come out with Donald Trump on day two of the administration saying exactly that. We're going to use AI to analyze your blood, which is how they get the DNA gene sequences. It's AI that creates the DNA gene sequences, that sends it to the gene banks. That's why it's electronic and they can send it, because it's using AI. It's not like, you know, a sample that they're sending. Physically, it's a digital code. It all comes together."

Sense Receptor

35,149 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Dr. Pierre Kory: "But then I started to read books on the history of vaccines, and I found that these myths that were taught in medical school, that they're myths. They're not evidence based. You know, this constant refrain, and you heard it in the hearings, about how smallpox vaccine rid us of the smallpox epidemic. That is completely false. The opposite is true." "If you really look at the history of smallpox, the vaccine made things worse, and yet our history was written as if the vaccine cured that epidemic. Same thing with polio. It's another narrative and myth that we rid ourselves of polio. There's more polio like paralysis in the world today than there was during the polio epidemic. And we know why, because it wasn't polio." "It was mass use of pesticides and DDT that was causing paralysis in all of these kids. And and you could see the spikes and waves, and, also, most of the childhood illnesses had the deaths from them had literally plummeted to near zero by the time the vaccines for those diseases came out. And yet, what are we told historically? That the vaccines eradicated childhood... No." "It didn't. We know that now. It was personal hygiene, sanitation, water purification, you know, getting rid of slums and the, you know, the the pestilence in some of the, inner city neighborhoods that that fostered and breed these epidemics. And so vaccines had very little to do with it. And so you ask me where I am now?" "So that's that's one thing. The overstating of the efficacy and the miracle of these vaccines is a myth. Then there's the other side to it, which is the and and I learned this from ivermectin in terms of the censorship of the journal level, the propaganda that the journals play. But the burying of adverse events and the toxicities vaccines, they go hand in hand." "It's it's safe and effective. Right? So they they propagandize both, and the pharma does this around every product. But the safety of these vaccines has never been shown. In fact, it's been suppressed." "This idea that there's no link between vaccines and autism is laughable, just laughable. There's immense amounts of data. There's no other explanation for the massive skyrocketing rise in autism rates and ADHD and allergies. They all parallel the explosion in the childhood schedule. So for anyone to say that there's no link, there's plenty of links." "They've done studies comparing unvaccinated, vaccinated kids. There's a recent one in the last few weeks showing much higher rates amongst the vaccinated for all of those important diseases. So we know that there are really negative consequences to vaccination, but you never hear of them. Right? All you hear is how effective they are and how safe they are, and it's an easy decision." "Anyone who questions it, there's something wrong with them. They don't know the science. And and that that was one of the themes of this week. You you heard senator after senator on one side of the aisle completely Royce, I mean, I'm not saying anything is new to you, but watching that, I literally felt I mean, I could feel it that they were getting paid to say that." "The things that they were told to said, those narratives were, like, literally to say this to Bobby and to the American people, and they just kept putting out little pharmaceutical talking points, attacking Bobby, and, it it's it's really kind of disturbing to watch, Royce." "I mean, these are the people leading our country, and they're bought and paid for and talking for, corporations. It's it's sad to see."

Camus

279,854 просмотров • 1 год назад

Naomi Wolf: "I didn't take the COVID injection partly because of my tech background. I read the Moderna website and they were boasting that this was this injection was like software that could be upgraded. That was the right? That was the pitch to investors." "And the point there was, oh, you're not just gonna make profit once as with a normal vaccine. You're gonna make profit over and over and over. And that way I knew in, you know, 2020 that there were gonna be multiple injections before anyone said, oh, it's not just one, you need a second. Oh, it's not just two, you need a booster. It's not just three, you need the new booster." "And that was scary. And I also saw that, they that the biotech, journals were a lot more excited about the mRNA platform, which they really spoke about and still do as a tech platform. Right? Then were medical journals that weren't excited at all and had, you know, knew that lipid nanoparticles, for instance, for ten years have horrible effects on human beings and on reproduction specifically." "And many of you know that, you know, the book is over there, the Pfizer papers. I've spent the last three and a half years overseeing this group of 3,250 doctors and scientists to read through the 450,000 documents released, from the FDA by a successful lawsuit by Aaron Siri." "So it's very exciting that the custodian of that criminal prize, has resigned. And, we did find the greatest crime against humanity in recorded history. So I encourage you to get the book." "It's right over there, but it dovetails with everything you're hearing. I know that this injection was rolled out shortly before the rollout of AI. And it wiped out a lot of old people. It, you know, excess deaths are off the charts. Our own, findings center on the, sterilization of three hundred and sixty degree." "I spoke about it last time I was here. Degradation of the human ability to reproduce. Successful live births are down thirteen to twenty percent in Western democracies specifically. It's definitely targeted, which is why Sasha's work is so important as well as the work of everyone on this stage and many of all of you, no doubt." "But the bottom line is I don't think that's an accident. I mean, it's like they won't need us. They won't need us. They don't wanna pay for our social security. They don't wanna educate our kids."

Camus

105,310 просмотров • 1 год назад

Dr. Suzanne Humphries: "That's why the truth gets locked down over COVID. You've seen the athletes dropping dead. You know about the cardiomyopathies and the pulmonary emboli and and all that kind of thing. Nobody's talking about the stem cells that the newborn babies are born without. Nobody's talking about the fact that there are now death doulas to deliver dead babies. Like, that wasn't even a thing before." "But I've got a friend that's a midwife who tells me that they are now creating a new field, which are midwives that only deliver dead babies. They do nothing else. They didn't need that before. COVID was an absolute nightmare in terms of, obstetrics, gynecology, labor, and delivery." "A lot of midwives that got done and and because they didn't get vaccinated, they don't even wanna go back now that they can go back because they don't wanna have their good reputations of a 100% of, you know, normal births being dealing with what's being dealt with today in terms of the birth problems that are happening because of the actual vaccine itself." "If it causes problems and blood clots in our circulation, what do you think it's gonna do to a placenta that is pretty much all blood vessel? That's all it is. It's like a big blood vessel sandwich is what it is. And there was no studies that showed that it was safe to give to pregnant women, but yet they were saying that. Well, there's look. Every influenza vaccine pack package insert says it's never been tested for carcinogenicity or mutagenicity in pregnant women, yet it's recommended every year for every pregnant woman." "And every time they get pregnant or not, it's recommended. Same with the pertussis vaccine. Give it to pregnant women. Never mind that it changes the immune the immune reactivity of the infant. Nobody talks about these things. This is what I say when you know? It's like the truth is so much more complicated than the sound bite lie. The sound bite lie lie is what gets around the world three times. The science is settled. Science is settled." "There's no debate needed because the likes of me are so crazy and, you know, whacked out and, you know, well, I'm trying to just destroy the good order of the the general public."

Camus

66,709 просмотров • 1 год назад

Registered nurse/whistleblower Michelle Spencer: "I know a sonographer who's been a sonographer for 40 years. She can look at an ultrasound of a mother, [her] placenta, and she can tell them, you got Pfizer, you got Moderna... it's in the placenta... even if the father got it, the baby is affected." This clip of Spencer (Michelle Spencer) is taken from an interview with Jodi O'Malley (Jodi O'Malley) posted to the NursesOutLoud (Nurses Out Loud) Rumble channel on November 1, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "They have not investigated the dead babies. They— They did investigate briefly after my investigation, when I said, you have an obligation to investigate. They went back and they checked, and they found that all of the fetal demises, 95% of them had Covid-vaccinated mothers. So that is a huge amount. "And the other little percent, maybe the record of the mother wasn't in there, because over here in California, they're highly vaxxed. Yes, most of them did get vaccinated because the OB doctor pushes it on them every single time. So they're highly vaxxed. "And then also I know a sonographer who's been a sonographer for 40 years. She can look at an ultrasound of a mother, a placenta, and she can tell them, you got Pfizer, you got Moderna. And if that's crazy, to be able to see that in an ultrasound. And if that patient, the mother, did not get COVID vaccine. The COVID vaccine, that means the father did, and it's in the placenta. So even if the father got it, the baby is affected. "And so there was— There's a huge correlation, it's like an obvious correlation between the COVID vaccine and these dead babies... One of my nursing friends told me a couple weeks after my investigation. She said, yeah, they went back and checked, and they found this correlation. And, she just told me to— Just by by mouth. By word of mouth. And so, now that I've been working with Greg, I've told him that. So he's gonna try to get an order for discovery to go back and check the fetal demises and the COVID-vaxxed mothers, to find the correlation, which is clearly there."

Sense Receptor

61,058 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Prof. Angus Dalgleish: "This [was] all pre-planned... the so-called COVID pandemic, the global warming, etc. etc... What's common about them is they all... have to induce... a state of fear... climate change... like COVID [is] all doom and gloom [based on]... computer models." This clip of Dalgleish, a professor of oncology at St George’s, University of London, is from a conversation with Charles Kovess (Charles Kovess) et al. posted to Rumble on August 17, 2025. ---------------Partial Transcription of Clip-------------- "This is all pre-planned. I mean I'm horrified to say that because I never thought that the people would stoop so low at the beginning I thought the, I used to think the best of everything, but I never thought it'd be so low. But I've just finished editing another book along the lines of Death in Science, which we did, which I mentioned. And the bottom line of this is actually putting the similarities between things like the so-called COVID pandemic, the global warming, etc. Etc. "What's common about them, they all induce, have to induce artificially psyops, everything, a state of fear. Absolutely Angus, that's very important. Yeah, yeah, they have to induce a state of fear and then you can start to control the population. And what you have to get across this is for the greater good. You are going to have to make sacrifices for the greater good and this, that and the other. "But if you ask the simple question Cui bono, who benefits? It is quite horrendous. It's based on the manipulation of the governments and government agencies from the United nations to the top. The who, all the governments who acted identically because they were all feared, they were all told they had to look after their population and induce these. Any human rights lawyers or anything like that were told no, no. This is the state of war. You've got to shut up. This is what we're going to do and this is the plan. We will rescue you with these vaccines. "And now it's the same with the climate control. Exactly the same. You've got to do all this sacrifice for your children otherwise they'll end up in a burning hell of a planet. It's exactly so. You have to agree to all these things. But who benefits? The people who benefit are people who are already supremely rich. The Bill Gateses and the Soroses and all these people of the world. And what I witnessed amongst this is basically I would say the greatest removal of money from the very poor and given to the very rich since the Napoleonic wars. And it's like these, these are scams that make these people super rich and in control. "And they worked out how to use these big organizations which used to be very thinking, altruistic, doing everything for the good. So they're completely in the control. And if you go, the climate change is another thing. Totally. And I can't find any redeeming defects for climate change, only on the grounds that certain people manipulated their data. And like the COVID all the doom, gloom and horror was all done in computer models, which the government accepted. "They wouldn't accept logic from people like me or several people who've been climatologists at top universities all their lives who said, you know, there is no scientific evidence for this. This is all speculation. They were basically hoodwinked into believing this stuff. And it's just, you know, the UK thing, all the decisions were based on Neil Ferguson's pathetic, puerile and, completely incompetent, useless modeling, which was funded by and still is. And he's been given another enormous grant, in spite of the fact he's never got anything right in his life. Bill Gates, it all goes. So this, this is what really frightens me."

Sense Receptor

15,240 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

"[FOIA'd April 2021 emails show] Israeli Ministry of Health and a major pediatricians' organization had been warning the White House that teenagers were having their hearts damaged from the injection...[and] all these top [WH] officials freaking out about how to cover it up." DailyClout CEO, author, and professor Dr. Naomi Wolf (Dr. Naomi Wolf. 8 NYT Bestsellers. DPhil, Poetry.) describes on a recently posted episode of HIS GLORY (HIS GLORY) how FOIA'd emails from April 2021 show that the Biden White House knew that the COVID injections were causing myocarditis in young people. The unearthed emails not only reveal that "top officials"—including former NIAID head Tony Fauci and former CDC head Rochelle Walensky—knew that the COVID injections were causing myocarditis in young people but also that they were "freaking out about how to cover it up." After the Biden White House had knowledge of the damaging effect of the injections (myocarditis is inflammation of the heart muscle and can lead to heart failure or sudden cardiac death), Wolf notes that it "proceed[ed] with a major PR campaign, including teen pop stars and teen influencers, to persuade parents to inject their teenage kids and persuade college students to get the injection." ----------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "Dave there, there one of our lawyers, FOIA'd, Freedom of Information Act all the mentions of myocarditis in the White House, the Biden White House and what we got, I think from a whistleblower because they released quite a lot that probably didn't have to release was truly shocking. It was evidence. Internal emails from 15 White House staffers, again Biden staffers, including a form that surfaced the discussion to POTUS. "So Biden himself may have known, or Mrs. Biden, whoever was running the country in Biden's stead. Also Dr. Walensky, Dr. Fauci, the head of HHS, the head of the FDA, they were all on, you know, communicating in these emails and what the substance was, was the Israeli Ministry of Health and a major pediatricians' organization had been warning the White House that teenagers were having their hearts damaged from the injection. And that wasn't safe for kids and young, young men. "And instead of stopping everything, this was April of 2021. These emails show all these top officials freaking out about how to cover it up. And then the Conclusion is a 17 page script which is completely redacted. Senator Johnson now is trying to unredact those 17 pages, but that script is a script that they used, you may remember, for the all summer and fall to lie about myocarditis, to say it was rare and mild and transient, which it isn't. And to do, you know, proceed with a major PR campaign including teen pop stars and teen influencers, to persuade parents to inject their teenage kids and you know, persuade college students to, to get the injection. "So it's criminal. I mean, one of my own loved ones, you know, was mandated by an Ivy League school like three times to get this injection after the White House knew that it was going to damage the hearts of young men particularly. So it's beyond criminal. Why did they."

Sense Receptor

24,795 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨🚨🚨😱😱😱 Australians Stunned by Professor Dalgleish appearence Sky News: mRNA Vaccines Linked to Unbelievable Damage! -------------------------- "...from the very beginning, these vaccines were not vaccines, particularly the ones that ended up after AstraZeneca with all the clots and they were shut down. But the messenger RNA vaccines of Pfizer and Moderna have caused unbelievable problems and damage to people, and I don't think we will ever really be able to get over that!" "They changed the mechanism of manufacturing between the trial and the roll out to about six billion people. This thing was full of contaminants. It was full of sequences that can actually get into your genome. And my big concern is that a lot of them explain why that couple of years into this epidemic, we still have massive excess deaths, excess deaths in Australia, New Zealand, and everywhere. And a lot of these now are due to cancer....The red flags are so enormous. Why has the government not banned these vaccines immediately? For a start, COVID doesn't exist anymore. And if it does, it doesn't kill anybody anymore. So why are you using vaccines, boosters that we now know increase the rate of cancer and the cancers are appalling, they're turbo cancers." "These were horrible gene therapies that could actually integrate into your genome. And this is one of the reasons we're seeing this horrendous rise in turbo cancers. I'm terrified what they have done to our children." "Now, I cannot believe the MHRA and the TGA and the FDA, the level of incompetence and negligence. And they have to be held. This is Nuremberg trial stuff! They are so awful. Now, we know about the contamination. Your TGA has stood up and said, "oh, we've done this little study, that study", what have you. "But it doesn't really matter, because they're safe and effective. They started the mandate that these vaccines were safe and effective". No, they were never, ever effective. I've looked at the first submissions of Pfizer to the FDA. There was no evidence that they were effective whatsoever. It's basically hope. And they were never, ever safe. TGA Australia @BroadbentMP Senator Gerard Rennick Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

aussie17

834,893 просмотров • 1 год назад

RFK Jr. on Bill Gates and African Women Sterilized by Vaccines: "WHO with Gates's influence, support, participation, administered a million vaccines to Kenyan women , that designed to sterilize them against without their knowledge and against their will." "They're pretending it was a tetanus program that included in that tetanus vaccines without anybody knowing. on human gonadotrophic hormones, which interact with tetanus toxoids as a essentially a chemical castration drug for women." "And he gave that to WHO gave that to at least a million women in Kenya, and they had similar programs in Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines, which which clearly they were doing that although we don't have the vials. We got the vials from Kenya so we know what they were doing and they've admitted it." "They've admitted that there was human, at first denied that there was human gonadotrophic hormone in that vaccine, which there's no reason it should have been and then admit it that there were. But if you read my book, you'll read that for 20 years. WHO has been spending tens of millions of dollars developing these sterilization drugs to surrogate women. Now, you know, this sounds paranoid, but they've published papers on it." "I'm saying WHO has published, has paid researchers to find ways to chemically castrate women. Against their will and without their knowledge. All I can tell you is from the papers, it's just saying, these are studies that are developing drugs. They're saying, here's how this works and we tested on people and it works. And then when it came time for them to use those products that WHO has spent all those years developing, they gave it to a million women surreptitiously without their knowledge." "So the papers don't say here's what we're going to do, we're going to sneak up on them and ambush them. The papers say, here's how you develop this vaccine and you hide it in a tennis vaccine. And then when it actually came time for them to do the program, they did not tell the women and they were caught by the Catholic Medical Association of Kenya, who noticed that first of all." "Usually when you get a tetanus vaccine, you only give one dose and it's good for 10 years, but they were told to give five doses in six months, which made the doctors, the Catholic Medical Association say something's wrong here. And it was only given to women of childbearing age, women from 14 years old to I think 34 years old, which was weird because men also get tetanus." "That's when the Catholic Doctors Association got ahold of the vials and they tested them in half a dozen different labs and they all came back, or most of them, not all, but most of them came back and said, yeah, they contain this drug. Have they explained why the HGH was in the vaccine?" "There's no reason to put it in the vaccine. Initially, they said it's not in there. And now they're saying in the current ones, it's not in, but they admitted it. It was in the ones that the Catholic doctors associations tested and they could not they said it's in there but it wasn't put in there to sterilize women and it's not large enough. And they say it's safe. I mean and they say that the vaccines are safe and that they're there to protect women and their newborn babies from tetanus. So I mean look we're out on a thin read talking about the intentional sterilization of women in Africa without their consent or knowledge. The evidence is very well documented."

Camus

284,731 просмотров • 1 год назад

WOW! Registered nurse/whistleblower Michelle Spencer: "I know a sonographer who's been a sonographer for 40 years... she can read ultrasounds, and she can tell the mother, 'Oh, you got Pfizer, you got Moderna'... [because] the placenta has these characteristics of this shot. And the dad is responsible for the placenta health. And so the placenta will carry dad's DNA. So if it's there, it's from dad. So even if the mother didn't receive the shot, but the dad did, it still will affect the baby... That mRNA protein, it's in the sperm also..." This clip of Spencer (Michelle Spencer) is taken from an interview with Apollo the Original (Apollo The Original) posted to YouTube on October 27, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "I know a sonographer who's been a sonographer for 40 years, and she reads ultrasounds. So she can read ultrasounds, and she can tell the mother, 'Oh, you got Pfizer, you got Moderna.' And if they're like, well, no, I didn't get the vaccine. Well, the placenta has these characteristics of this shot, and the dad is responsible for the, placenta health. And so the placenta will carry dad's DNA. So, if it's there, it's from dad. So even if the mother didn't receive the shot, but the dad did, it still will affect the baby... That mRNA Protein. It's in the sperm also... "[And] the babies are still being born dead, and we're in 2025. And so mothers aren't necessarily receiving the COVID vaccines anymore. They are getting cov— They're getting vaccinated for TDAP, the flu. And then, like, RSV is a newer one. When they go to their doctor, they push all of these. So whether it's Covid or it's these new ones, I— I'm not sure. But the babies are still dying. And it's. Every time I go to work, there's a dead baby. And that, never should be normal. "And I have asked many nurses— Are they okay with this? Yep. And they all say, I appreciate what you're doing. I believe you, but I can't lose my job."

Sense Receptor

917,467 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад