Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

The Doherty Threshold says something stupidly simple: Keep response times under 400ms (0.4 seconds). That's it. But 99% of products ignore this and wonder why users bounce. Your product either feels effortless… or like pulling teeth. No in-between.

109,431 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

12 Kommentare

Profilbild von Denislav Jeliazkov
Denislav Jeliazkovvor 1 Jahr

Look at these 2 UIs. One of them will 100% outperform the other for one reason: The Doherty Threshold. Here's how this psychological principle works & how to use it in your products:

Profilbild von Denislav Jeliazkov
Denislav Jeliazkovvor 1 Jahr

Perfect example of this in action: Take Linear: Every click is instant. • No loading states • No spinners • No thinking Create project → Add tasks → Assign → Done. The whole flow feels like butter.

Profilbild von Denislav Jeliazkov
Denislav Jeliazkovvor 1 Jahr

Jira, on the other hand? It’s like trying to sprint in molasses. • Complex flows • Slow page loads • Useless animations to hide the slowness By the time you create a task, you forget why you opened it.

Profilbild von Denislav Jeliazkov
Denislav Jeliazkovvor 1 Jahr

Here's the psychology behind it: When interactions happen under 400ms, your brain perceives them as instant. Above 400ms? Your brain notices the delay. And once you notice it, you can't un-notice it.

Profilbild von Denislav Jeliazkov
Denislav Jeliazkovvor 1 Jahr

Speed isn't the goal here - it's all about finding your FLOW STATE. Every delay breaks concentration. Every lag pulls you out of the zone. Every loading spinner interrupts thinking. 400ms is the difference between flow and frustration.

Profilbild von Denislav Jeliazkov
Denislav Jeliazkovvor 1 Jahr

Most designers obsess over pixels and colors while their app takes 2 seconds to load. Bro, your gradient doesn't matter if users rage quit before they see it. Speed IS design.

Profilbild von Denislav Jeliazkov
Denislav Jeliazkovvor 1 Jahr

Some examples that can tank your products: Form submission: 3 seconds (users think it's broken) Search results: 2+ seconds (they've already left) Page transitions: 1.2 seconds (feels like dial-up) They might all be beautiful UIs. Soon they'd be all dead products.

Profilbild von Denislav Jeliazkov
Denislav Jeliazkovvor 1 Jahr

How to actually fix this: • Optimistic UI updates (show success before server confirms) • Skeleton screens instead of spinners • Preload data before users need it • Cache everything possible Make it FEEL instant even when it's not.

Profilbild von Denislav Jeliazkov
Denislav Jeliazkovvor 1 Jahr

What really gets to me is this: Founders will spend $100k on "beautiful design" but won't invest in performance. Pretty UI with slow interactions = lipstick on a pig. Fast UI with basic design = users will forgive everything.

Profilbild von Denislav Jeliazkov
Denislav Jeliazkovvor 1 Jahr

Bottom line: Everyone obsesses over features, aesthetics, & "innovation." But the Doherty Threshold is the silent killer of products. Your app could cure cancer - but if it takes 2 seconds to load, users will hate it.

Profilbild von Denislav Jeliazkov
Denislav Jeliazkovvor 1 Jahr

Designers: I created a 200-page book of actionable tips and tricks for your everyday design decisions (including psych principles), to help you on your way to becoming a 6-fig designer. It's a no-BS, 100% learn-by-doing approach. Grab it here:

Profilbild von Denislav Jeliazkov
Denislav Jeliazkovvor 1 Jahr

Liked this thread? Give your bro @DenisJeliazkov a follow for more cool design processes & breakdowns. And like/repost to help a fellow designer:

Ähnliche Videos

Shayne Coplan, CEO of Polymarket, on why dogfooding your own product is the single best shortcut to building something people want: Shayne is asked what he thinks it takes for a founder to build a successful company. He starts by dismantling the fantasy he once had as a teenager: "When I was in high school, I was always like, man, I'm going to build this side project. It's going to get traction. People are going to give me money, and then I'm going to drop out. And it's going to be like this perfect clean break where I take no risk. Completely did not happen." Shayne dropped out of college at 18, but what followed was nothing like the smooth ride he'd imagined. "There were almost 3 years of like complete brutality of things not working and me trying things and me learning different things and running out of money, stressed about rent, like the whole 9 yards." That stretch taught him the first non-negotiable for any founder: full commitment. "If you really want to do this, if you really feel like it's your calling, don't half-ass it. Go all in. Don't hedge your bets." Shayne Coplan 🦅 continues: "If you're hedging your bets and you kind of haven't cut the rope and you're like, 'Well, I'm still at this, but I'm trying this on the side, whatever.' That's not how great, durable businesses and products start in this day and age. You got to go all in. You got to give it every ounce you got." But going all in is only half the equation. The other half, and the part Shayne believes is the real shortcut, is being one of your own users: "You have to obsess over your customers and people who are using your product. And just the easiest thing to do to build a product company is to use the product yourself and to talk to your own users all the time and triage between what you learn from your users, what you learn from dogfooding your own product, and your product development cycles." He ends with a dose of humility: "It's all I got. I'm still learning honestly."

Big Brain Business

10,858 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Sam Altman on why you shouldn’t track absolute user growth in the early days of a startup “Nothing but a great product will save you; you can get everything else right and it still won’t work.” He points out that almost all startup founders get the following wrong: “It is more important to have a small number of users that love you than a lot of users that like you… Eventually what you want of course is a lot of users that really love your product, but that’s almost impossible to do.” In practice, you have two choices: Deep and Narrow: “You have a small number of users that really love you and then find out how to find more and more of those users and broaden the appeal of the product.” Shallow and Wide: “You can have a lot of people that sort of use the product once or twice and kind of like it and try to figure out how to get them more engaged over time.” “With high confidence, I can say that you want to start with a small number of users that really love you. Almost all great companies have products that start this way.” He argues that a good indicator of users loving your product is retention and frequency of use: “In fact, I think this is so important that you actually shouldn’t track absolute growth in number of users in the early days of a startup. You should just track how often they’re using it… That’s a good early indicator of users that love you—better still is them spontaneously telling their friends to buy your product.” Follow Startup Archive for more tactical startup advice!

Startup Archive

565,774 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Q: How do you decide which customers to listen to? As Superhuman founder & CEO Rahul Vohra puts it: “In a world where you’re drowning in feedback—and most startups are drowning in feedback—you have to filter it down to only the stuff that’s going to increase the number of people who fall in love with your product.” Most startups will listen to all feedback from on-the-fence customers, but this isn’t targeted enough and will often lead to a muddled, incoherent product. As Rahul argues in the clip below, you need to identify the main benefit of your product—for Superhuman this was speed. And then focus on the feedback of on-the-fence users who also view this as the main benefit—there’s often something small holding them back. Users for whom your main benefit does not resonate (e.g. Superhuman users who value offline capabilities rather than speed), are unlikely to ever fall in love with your product. When Superhuman ran this analysis in 2015, they found that the main thing holding back users who viewed speed as the main benefit was their lack of a mobile app. Probing further, they found some less obvious and more interesting requests, such as integrations, attachment handling, calendering, unified inbox and read receipts. With a clear understanding of their main benefit and missing features, they were able to move this cohort of users from on-the-fence into the territory of enthusiastic advocates. As Rahul puts it in his Product Market Fit Engine article: “To increase your product/market fit score, spend half your time doubling down on what users already love and the other half on addressing what’s holding others back.” But make sure you’re focusing on users who love the main benefit of your product. Users who don’t are unlikely to ever fall in love with your product.

Michael McGuiness

89,872 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren