Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

The draft roll for UP’s SIR was published on January 6. Within hours, the BJP’s state leadership had set a target for its booth workers. The law requires every claim and objection to be made public. For 16.18 lakh Form 6 additions, it was not. Read:

25,316 views • 7 days ago •via X (Twitter)

3 Comments

Flying Lancer Полковник Раджен Bhaduri's profile picture
Flying Lancer Полковник Раджен Bhaduri7 days ago

Gyanu should face the firing squad for treason😡🤬

Azad_Saddu's profile picture
Azad_Saddu7 days ago

Good job 👍

Aurangzeb : Father of Santre 🍊's profile picture
Aurangzeb : Father of Santre 🍊7 days ago

Desh meh kya ho raha h😌

Related Videos

#WATCH | Delhi | BJP National Spokesperson and MP Sambit Patra says, "Rahul Gandhi misled the public on two counts. First, he claimed that Form 6 was illegal—specifically mentioning the Bharatiya Janata Party in this context. However, the Court did not declare Form 6 illegal today. It noted that the petition mentioned a modification to Form 6, so the Court said it would look into the matter. We had not consented to any such modification. If any modification has indeed taken place, that will become clear only after a notice is issued. Yet, when we read the detailed order and look at the Election Commission's press release dated September 26, 2018, it becomes evident that the Commission had clearly stated there were no changes to Form 6 and that the Supreme Court had validated the declaration form attached to it. Therefore, there is no ambiguity here. Rahul Gandhi is lying when he claims that Form 6 was illegal and that the Supreme Court has said so today. This is exactly like the Rafale issue, where Rahul Gandhi claimed the Supreme Court had spoken of massive irregularities; later, he had to submit an affidavit to that very Supreme Court and offer an unconditional apology. The same thing is going to happen here. There are consequences for lying. The second issue on which Rahul Gandhi misled the public is his claim that the decision was not unanimous. This decision was not unanimous; meaning, the three Election Commissioners did not arrive at this decision collectively. The Election Commission of India (ECI) has clarified this in its fact-check. The first point of the fact-check states that the order regarding the SIR in Bihar, issued on June 24, 2025, was released with the unanimous approval of the Commission; this order was subsequently upheld by the Honorable Supreme Court of India in its judgment dated May 27, 2026. It was indeed a unanimous decision, leaving no room for doubt. I remember this clearly because we held a press conference that day; when the press release was issued, the three Election Commissioners posed for a photograph together, and that very image was released to the public. On both these counts—these two specific issues—Rahul Gandhi attempted to mislead the nation and the public, effectively trying to create a state of anarchy"

ANI

32,374 views • 10 days ago