Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

The DSA is changing the Democratic party without expanding it, just by capturing its richest and most educated voters. Their own membership data shows over 80% of adult members hold college degrees, 35% have graduate degrees, nearly 30% earn six figures, and only 4% work blue collar jobs. High...

Rothmus's profile picture

Rothmus 🏴

673,973 subscribers

26,664 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

EducationNews & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 The Left’s Blue-Collar Skinsuit DSA activist Eric Blanc, himself a Rutgers professor, admits that the modern socialist labor movement disproportionately self-selects for college graduates and white-collar professionals, while its “weak link” remains blue-collar workers without college degrees. He then praises the UAW for possessing the “historic legitimacy” and resources needed to reach Southern workers who are not already socialists. That is the socialist skinsuit strategy in unusually plain language. A professionalized, college-educated Left climbs inside institutions built by blue-collar workers and wears their inherited legitimacy to reach people it cannot persuade on its own.
0:56

🚨 The Left’s Blue-Collar Skinsuit DSA activist Eric Blanc, himself a Rutgers professor, admits that the modern socialist labor movement disproportionately self-selects for college graduates and white-collar professionals, while its “weak link” remains blue-collar workers without college degrees. He then praises the UAW for possessing the “historic legitimacy” and resources needed to reach Southern workers who are not already socialists. That is the socialist skinsuit strategy in unusually plain language. A professionalized, college-educated Left climbs inside institutions built by blue-collar workers and wears their inherited legitimacy to reach people it cannot persuade on its own.

Stu Smith

26,997 views • 1 month ago

Former Far-Left liberals says the Democratic Socialists of America is lying to all of us She exposes the truth, the DSA is not about bettering life for working people - The DSA's own membership is 85% white - The average age is 33 - 80% of them have college degrees “We're not talking about factory workers here. These are grad students. They are nonprofit staffers. They are people with master's degrees in sociology — The thing is their agenda is not about affordability at all. It is about their hatred for this country. The DSA now claims over 250 elected officials nationwide. They are taking over the Democratic Party from city councils to Congress, and they are doing it with the votes of privileged white college graduates who have also been taught to hate this country in their Ivy League classrooms like the ones that I also sat in. They hate America's history, they hate its institutions, and they even hate its flag” “They are fighting for their own ideological vanity project, and it is being funded by upper middle class white guilt and paid for with other people's money. The DSA is not a working class movement. It is a campus movement, and it never left college. It is a sneaky sideways takeover of the Democratic Party by people who hate America, and everyone is falling for it” The DSA is just proof of our universities being foreign infiltrated to bring us down. The entire part is just early 30s college students who are mass indoctrinated white people
4:20

Former Far-Left liberals says the Democratic Socialists of America is lying to all of us She exposes the truth, the DSA is not about bettering life for working people - The DSA's own membership is 85% white - The average age is 33 - 80% of them have college degrees “We're not talking about factory workers here. These are grad students. They are nonprofit staffers. They are people with master's degrees in sociology — The thing is their agenda is not about affordability at all. It is about their hatred for this country. The DSA now claims over 250 elected officials nationwide. They are taking over the Democratic Party from city councils to Congress, and they are doing it with the votes of privileged white college graduates who have also been taught to hate this country in their Ivy League classrooms like the ones that I also sat in. They hate America's history, they hate its institutions, and they even hate its flag” “They are fighting for their own ideological vanity project, and it is being funded by upper middle class white guilt and paid for with other people's money. The DSA is not a working class movement. It is a campus movement, and it never left college. It is a sneaky sideways takeover of the Democratic Party by people who hate America, and everyone is falling for it” The DSA is just proof of our universities being foreign infiltrated to bring us down. The entire part is just early 30s college students who are mass indoctrinated white people

Wall Street Apes

140,966 views • 1 month ago

I am calling on Jay Jacobs, Chair of the New York State Democratic Party, to take decisive action and remove the Working Families Party (WFP) and Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) from the Democratic Party line. These organizations are not Democrats. They are socialists who rebrand themselves as Democrats to mislead voters — but their platform and values do not reflect those of traditional Democrats. This is not about progress — it’s about pushing a radical, far-left agenda that leans more toward communism than the core principles of the Democratic Party. Real Democrats believe in law and order, economic opportunity, and protecting working families without tearing down the entire system. I’m also urging major donors to reconsider their contributions to the New York State Democratic Party until it takes a stand and restores integrity. New Yorkers deserve a party that represents their values — not one hijacked by extremists.
4:11

I am calling on Jay Jacobs, Chair of the New York State Democratic Party, to take decisive action and remove the Working Families Party (WFP) and Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) from the Democratic Party line. These organizations are not Democrats. They are socialists who rebrand themselves as Democrats to mislead voters — but their platform and values do not reflect those of traditional Democrats. This is not about progress — it’s about pushing a radical, far-left agenda that leans more toward communism than the core principles of the Democratic Party. Real Democrats believe in law and order, economic opportunity, and protecting working families without tearing down the entire system. I’m also urging major donors to reconsider their contributions to the New York State Democratic Party until it takes a stand and restores integrity. New Yorkers deserve a party that represents their values — not one hijacked by extremists.

Lattina Brown, MPA 🇯🇲🇺🇸

45,299 views • 1 year ago

DEMOCRATS ARE LOSING THEIR BASE! - Four out of ten voters in America are white working class. The biggest bloc in the country. And they trust Republicans over Democrats on the economy by 16 points, per Fox News and the Washington Post! On inflation, same 16! Think about that. The party that swears it's for the working man just lost the working man on the very thing that empties his wallet every week. The groceries, the gas, the rent. He looked at both parties and picked the elephant. Democrats can run every ad they want. The working class already made up its mind.
6:20

DEMOCRATS ARE LOSING THEIR BASE! - Four out of ten voters in America are white working class. The biggest bloc in the country. And they trust Republicans over Democrats on the economy by 16 points, per Fox News and the Washington Post! On inflation, same 16! Think about that. The party that swears it's for the working man just lost the working man on the very thing that empties his wallet every week. The groceries, the gas, the rent. He looked at both parties and picked the elephant. Democrats can run every ad they want. The working class already made up its mind.

Bill Mitchell

21,333 views • 1 month ago

WOW. NBC’s Chuck Todd succinctly in two and a half minutes describes The Alignment in real time to viewers with the new Trump coalition adding working class Hispanics with a focus on the economy and education, not “Latinx”: Todd: Iowa pollster Ann Selzer “thought she found something with...independent women...I don’t know if it’s enough to make up for the loss of voters of color that have — clearly — I mean, that is — that continues, to me, to be the big story of the night is the shift among Hispanics. Look, Hispanic voters are swing voters and I think, you know, what's interesting here it is the Republican Party treated them the same way they treated white, working class voters. They courted them the same they treated white, working class voters. The Democratic Party has spent a lot of time treating it as an identity group. And, you know, whether it's latinx, which sort of fell flat and so, there’s been a lot of hand-wringing inside Democratic circles. A real split like, you know, it was a total misread sort of by the coastal strategists when it comes to how to target working class voters of color. And I think we’re starting to see sort of a working class coalition start to drift to the right. You know, before, Donald Trump had working class whites. Now? He’s adding working class Hispanics and working class — not necessary seeing evidence of working class African Americans — but adding working class Hispanics. That becomes a very durable majority...It doesn’t matter your ethnicity. It matters your education...Latino voters, in many ways, same — are driven by the same issues and there’s one issue in particular actually that Republicans align closer with Latino — or Latino voters align with conservative — with conservative party and that's school choice. And that has been -- and you can't help but wonder both Florida and Texas has been aggressive about expanding school choice. Where have Republicans made the greatest gains amongst Hispanic voters? Florida and Texas. So, education and economy, those issues — bread and butter issues and that is how they talk to them. Not saying Democrats weren't, but for the sort of cultural issues don't play as well with Hispanic voters as they may with college-educated whites or even African Americans.”
2:39

WOW. NBC’s Chuck Todd succinctly in two and a half minutes describes The Alignment in real time to viewers with the new Trump coalition adding working class Hispanics with a focus on the economy and education, not “Latinx”: Todd: Iowa pollster Ann Selzer “thought she found something with...independent women...I don’t know if it’s enough to make up for the loss of voters of color that have — clearly — I mean, that is — that continues, to me, to be the big story of the night is the shift among Hispanics. Look, Hispanic voters are swing voters and I think, you know, what's interesting here it is the Republican Party treated them the same way they treated white, working class voters. They courted them the same they treated white, working class voters. The Democratic Party has spent a lot of time treating it as an identity group. And, you know, whether it's latinx, which sort of fell flat and so, there’s been a lot of hand-wringing inside Democratic circles. A real split like, you know, it was a total misread sort of by the coastal strategists when it comes to how to target working class voters of color. And I think we’re starting to see sort of a working class coalition start to drift to the right. You know, before, Donald Trump had working class whites. Now? He’s adding working class Hispanics and working class — not necessary seeing evidence of working class African Americans — but adding working class Hispanics. That becomes a very durable majority...It doesn’t matter your ethnicity. It matters your education...Latino voters, in many ways, same — are driven by the same issues and there’s one issue in particular actually that Republicans align closer with Latino — or Latino voters align with conservative — with conservative party and that's school choice. And that has been -- and you can't help but wonder both Florida and Texas has been aggressive about expanding school choice. Where have Republicans made the greatest gains amongst Hispanic voters? Florida and Texas. So, education and economy, those issues — bread and butter issues and that is how they talk to them. Not saying Democrats weren't, but for the sort of cultural issues don't play as well with Hispanic voters as they may with college-educated whites or even African Americans.”

Curtis Houck

2,802,023 views • 1 year ago

Black America is more dependent on welfare and government jobs than any other group, so why is DSA a white college club that can’t sign them up? Blacks are 13% of the population, take 28% of SNAP, and fill 19% of federal jobs. Nonmarital births near 70% drive the poverty that keeps the dependency high. Polls give them HIGHER favorability for SOCIALISM than whites (52% to 31%) so we know the bigger checks already sell. And yet, DSA membership stays some 85% white with black numbers stuck in the single digits. And that’s because so far (1) the DSA pushes defunding the police and open borders while black neighborhoods eat the crime, and (2) it runs secular campus culture that is more urban, white, and not exactly working class. So blacks just stick with the Democratic machine that already cuts the checks. HOWEVER, when DSA candidates drop the culture war and run pure economics as they’ve done in places like DC, they win black wards the same way Democrats already lock in socially conservative Black churchgoers who take the welfare programs and ignore the rest of the socially liberal bs. That limited focus is enough for them now and it will be enough for DSA.
0:20

Black America is more dependent on welfare and government jobs than any other group, so why is DSA a white college club that can’t sign them up? Blacks are 13% of the population, take 28% of SNAP, and fill 19% of federal jobs. Nonmarital births near 70% drive the poverty that keeps the dependency high. Polls give them HIGHER favorability for SOCIALISM than whites (52% to 31%) so we know the bigger checks already sell. And yet, DSA membership stays some 85% white with black numbers stuck in the single digits. And that’s because so far (1) the DSA pushes defunding the police and open borders while black neighborhoods eat the crime, and (2) it runs secular campus culture that is more urban, white, and not exactly working class. So blacks just stick with the Democratic machine that already cuts the checks. HOWEVER, when DSA candidates drop the culture war and run pure economics as they’ve done in places like DC, they win black wards the same way Democrats already lock in socially conservative Black churchgoers who take the welfare programs and ignore the rest of the socially liberal bs. That limited focus is enough for them now and it will be enough for DSA.

Rothmus 🏴

41,868 views • 2 months ago

Even Andrew Cuomo is telling the DSA to shut up. That’s how toxic this is getting. AOC and the Democratic Socialists keep trying to sell “we’re just pro-democracy” while the rest of America hears “we want open borders, no Senate, and the government owning everything.” Cuomo’s advice to them was simple: the more they talk, the more Democrats they turn off. Black voters and the working class aren’t buying the socialism rebrand. And then you’ve got candidates bathing in AOC’s reflected glory while hanging around Hasan Piker like that’s a winning strategy. Republicans are already planning to make that association radioactive. AOC’s influence is real. It’s just not the kind that wins general elections.
1:39

Even Andrew Cuomo is telling the DSA to shut up. That’s how toxic this is getting. AOC and the Democratic Socialists keep trying to sell “we’re just pro-democracy” while the rest of America hears “we want open borders, no Senate, and the government owning everything.” Cuomo’s advice to them was simple: the more they talk, the more Democrats they turn off. Black voters and the working class aren’t buying the socialism rebrand. And then you’ve got candidates bathing in AOC’s reflected glory while hanging around Hasan Piker like that’s a winning strategy. Republicans are already planning to make that association radioactive. AOC’s influence is real. It’s just not the kind that wins general elections.

Gunther Eagleman™

23,010 views • 1 month ago

🚨 Is This Chris Cuomo Surrendering to DSA? Is DSA the Future of the Democratic Party? This Chris Cuomo segment almost feels like a surrender to the DSA. Cuomo frames the Democratic Socialists of America as the Democrats’ best shot at capturing populist affordability anger, then brings on DSA co-chair Ashik Siddique to make the socialist case. And who is the counterpoint? John Morgan of Morgan & Morgan, a Democratic mega-donor law-firm guy warning that socialism leads to Cuba and Venezuela. If the public face of the anti-DSA argument inside Democratic politics is a wealthy establishment Democrat telling people to trust the old Bill Clinton model while sounding like a Cold War PSA, then DSA has already won the optics fight before Ashik even opens his mouth. The worst part is that Morgan is basically right about the danger. He is just the worst possible messenger for it. If I had his ear, I would have told him to stop doing generic “socialism bad” warnings and get specific. Hit DSA on its own record. Hit them on their repeated delegations to Cuba and Venezuela, the praise for socialist regimes, the constant laundering of authoritarian politics through “solidarity,” and the new DSA platform coming this July, which I broke the news on. Saying “socialism bad” in the abstract does nothing. The argument has to be specific. DSA is bad by its own words and actions. By the delegations it sends, the regimes it flatters, the platform it passes, and the radicals it keeps elevating. Cuomo basically tees Siddique up as young and plugged into the future of the party. Morgan comes off like a dinosaur. And if he is serious about taking back his party, whoever is advising him on how to talk about DSA is doing him no favors.
6:38

🚨 Is This Chris Cuomo Surrendering to DSA? Is DSA the Future of the Democratic Party? This Chris Cuomo segment almost feels like a surrender to the DSA. Cuomo frames the Democratic Socialists of America as the Democrats’ best shot at capturing populist affordability anger, then brings on DSA co-chair Ashik Siddique to make the socialist case. And who is the counterpoint? John Morgan of Morgan & Morgan, a Democratic mega-donor law-firm guy warning that socialism leads to Cuba and Venezuela. If the public face of the anti-DSA argument inside Democratic politics is a wealthy establishment Democrat telling people to trust the old Bill Clinton model while sounding like a Cold War PSA, then DSA has already won the optics fight before Ashik even opens his mouth. The worst part is that Morgan is basically right about the danger. He is just the worst possible messenger for it. If I had his ear, I would have told him to stop doing generic “socialism bad” warnings and get specific. Hit DSA on its own record. Hit them on their repeated delegations to Cuba and Venezuela, the praise for socialist regimes, the constant laundering of authoritarian politics through “solidarity,” and the new DSA platform coming this July, which I broke the news on. Saying “socialism bad” in the abstract does nothing. The argument has to be specific. DSA is bad by its own words and actions. By the delegations it sends, the regimes it flatters, the platform it passes, and the radicals it keeps elevating. Cuomo basically tees Siddique up as young and plugged into the future of the party. Morgan comes off like a dinosaur. And if he is serious about taking back his party, whoever is advising him on how to talk about DSA is doing him no favors.

Stu Smith

22,489 views • 3 months ago

Joe Biden has just announced he’s not running for re-election and will support Vice President Kamala Harris’s candidacy instead. The announcement came as a shock to the people who work at the White House and to campaign aides, one of whom told Politico, "We’re all finding out by tweet. None of us understand what’s happening.” The same was true in Delaware, Biden’s home state. “I don’t think a soul in Delaware knew,” said a Biden campaign official. As such, this is the third time in three presidential elections that Democratic Party elites have subverted democracy to choose a presidential candidate. The first time this occurred was in 2016 when the Democratic National Committee manipulated money and process to help Hillary Clinton defeat Bernie Sanders. The second time was in 2020, when Party elites pushed out Pete Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar so Elizabeth Warren could split the progressive vote with Sanders, creating a path to victory for Biden. This year, Biden and the DNC prevented a competitive open primary, and now Biden is deciding who will be the nominee for Democrats. Harris was deeply unpopular with Democratic voters when she ran in the 2020 primary, leading her to drop out after her polling plummeted to the single digits. It’s true that the Democratic elites followed the formal rules, most Democrats agreed that Biden should not run again, and a Democrat could still challenge Kamala Harris at the convention. But the party undermined the spirit of democracy in every election. Democracy, at its core, is about letting the people decide for themselves. That simply didn’t happen. In fact, a very small number of Democratic Party donors and media elites chose Hillary Clinton, Biden, and Harris. In many ways it was the media who influenced donors and decided Biden should go after his disastrous debate performance. To the extent that ordinary Democratic Party voters turned against Biden it was in response to the media turning on him. When the media insisted that Biden was fine, and that the worries about his health were just right-wing propaganda, Democratic voters were loyal to him. While it’s true someone could challenge Harris for the nomination, it’s very hard to see that happening, given Biden’s endorsement and the argument from Kamala Harris supporters that it would be borderline racist for anyone else to win the nomination. Within a few hours, Bill and Hillary Clinton, Senator Tammy Baldwin, and Democratic mega-donor Reid Hoffman all endorsed Harris. Other Party elites will likely do the same. Over the last three weeks, Biden fought Democratic donors, media elites, and Party leaders. He insisted repeatedly he could do the job. But, in the end, they overwhelmed him. They withheld funding. They attacked almost every day, letting up for just 24 hours after the near-assassination of former President Trump. As a result, nobody could watch the events of the last few weeks and believe that the Democratic Party is democratic. It is a party controlled by the media, donors, and the deep state. However one feels about the GOP, the same can’t be said of Republicans. Republican voters rejected their own party leaders, donors, and the foreign policy establishment to nominate Trump for president in 2016. Democrats, by contrast, sided with the establishment candidate in choosing Clinton in 2016 and Biden in 2020. Why is that? Why did Democrats become the party controlled by elites and obedient to authority, and Republicans the party of rebellion and, increasingly, the working class?
5:38

Joe Biden has just announced he’s not running for re-election and will support Vice President Kamala Harris’s candidacy instead. The announcement came as a shock to the people who work at the White House and to campaign aides, one of whom told Politico, "We’re all finding out by tweet. None of us understand what’s happening.” The same was true in Delaware, Biden’s home state. “I don’t think a soul in Delaware knew,” said a Biden campaign official. As such, this is the third time in three presidential elections that Democratic Party elites have subverted democracy to choose a presidential candidate. The first time this occurred was in 2016 when the Democratic National Committee manipulated money and process to help Hillary Clinton defeat Bernie Sanders. The second time was in 2020, when Party elites pushed out Pete Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar so Elizabeth Warren could split the progressive vote with Sanders, creating a path to victory for Biden. This year, Biden and the DNC prevented a competitive open primary, and now Biden is deciding who will be the nominee for Democrats. Harris was deeply unpopular with Democratic voters when she ran in the 2020 primary, leading her to drop out after her polling plummeted to the single digits. It’s true that the Democratic elites followed the formal rules, most Democrats agreed that Biden should not run again, and a Democrat could still challenge Kamala Harris at the convention. But the party undermined the spirit of democracy in every election. Democracy, at its core, is about letting the people decide for themselves. That simply didn’t happen. In fact, a very small number of Democratic Party donors and media elites chose Hillary Clinton, Biden, and Harris. In many ways it was the media who influenced donors and decided Biden should go after his disastrous debate performance. To the extent that ordinary Democratic Party voters turned against Biden it was in response to the media turning on him. When the media insisted that Biden was fine, and that the worries about his health were just right-wing propaganda, Democratic voters were loyal to him. While it’s true someone could challenge Harris for the nomination, it’s very hard to see that happening, given Biden’s endorsement and the argument from Kamala Harris supporters that it would be borderline racist for anyone else to win the nomination. Within a few hours, Bill and Hillary Clinton, Senator Tammy Baldwin, and Democratic mega-donor Reid Hoffman all endorsed Harris. Other Party elites will likely do the same. Over the last three weeks, Biden fought Democratic donors, media elites, and Party leaders. He insisted repeatedly he could do the job. But, in the end, they overwhelmed him. They withheld funding. They attacked almost every day, letting up for just 24 hours after the near-assassination of former President Trump. As a result, nobody could watch the events of the last few weeks and believe that the Democratic Party is democratic. It is a party controlled by the media, donors, and the deep state. However one feels about the GOP, the same can’t be said of Republicans. Republican voters rejected their own party leaders, donors, and the foreign policy establishment to nominate Trump for president in 2016. Democrats, by contrast, sided with the establishment candidate in choosing Clinton in 2016 and Biden in 2020. Why is that? Why did Democrats become the party controlled by elites and obedient to authority, and Republicans the party of rebellion and, increasingly, the working class?

Michael Shellenberger

1,189,589 views • 2 years ago

I joined Stephen A Smith to talk about the Texas Primary and my belief that investing in Black voters is the missing link. Black voters who show up are the party’s most loyal base — over 80% of Black men and more than 90% of Black women vote Democratic. If you want different outcomes, you have to make different investments. The only place Democrats have flipped Senate seats in the South is Georgia, the third Blackest state in America — where there was a real investment in turning out Black voters. The question isn’t complicated: Why aren’t Democrats investing in the Black vote in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi? Also, primaries are about turning out your bases. The data says that Talarico had the money and time to invest in turning out white and Hispanic voters. To win he will have to do what no other Texas Democrat has been able to do in a general election — invest in Black voters to turnout Black communities.
2:10

I joined Stephen A Smith to talk about the Texas Primary and my belief that investing in Black voters is the missing link. Black voters who show up are the party’s most loyal base — over 80% of Black men and more than 90% of Black women vote Democratic. If you want different outcomes, you have to make different investments. The only place Democrats have flipped Senate seats in the South is Georgia, the third Blackest state in America — where there was a real investment in turning out Black voters. The question isn’t complicated: Why aren’t Democrats investing in the Black vote in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi? Also, primaries are about turning out your bases. The data says that Talarico had the money and time to invest in turning out white and Hispanic voters. To win he will have to do what no other Texas Democrat has been able to do in a general election — invest in Black voters to turnout Black communities.

Gary Chambers

17,523 views • 6 months ago

Legal genius Alan Dershowitz announces he’s officially leaving the Democrat Party and registering as a Republican. A lifelong liberal, Dershowitz says the Democrat Party’s “hostility” toward Israel and embrace of “radicalism” is “bad for America and the free world.” He’s putting it nicely. The Democrat Party has become rife with increasingly more antisemites—especially in Congress. But even this more reserved statement by Dershowitz is quite damning: “I believe the Democratic Party’s hostility to Israel represents a deeper and more dangerous shift away from the center and toward a radical approach that is bad for America and the world. So I intend to work hard to prevent the Democrats from gaining control of the House... and Senate, and I urge those who share my concerns about the increasing influence of radicalism in the Democratic Party to vote, campaign and contribute for continued Republican control of Congress.” The Democrat Party has gone so far to the left that it’s losing many of its genius members. The crazy thing is the Democrat Party doesn’t seem to care. They just keep getting more extremely ridiculous and out of touch with normal, nice Americans. (foxandfriends on 𝕏)
0:59

Legal genius Alan Dershowitz announces he’s officially leaving the Democrat Party and registering as a Republican. A lifelong liberal, Dershowitz says the Democrat Party’s “hostility” toward Israel and embrace of “radicalism” is “bad for America and the free world.” He’s putting it nicely. The Democrat Party has become rife with increasingly more antisemites—especially in Congress. But even this more reserved statement by Dershowitz is quite damning: “I believe the Democratic Party’s hostility to Israel represents a deeper and more dangerous shift away from the center and toward a radical approach that is bad for America and the world. So I intend to work hard to prevent the Democrats from gaining control of the House... and Senate, and I urge those who share my concerns about the increasing influence of radicalism in the Democratic Party to vote, campaign and contribute for continued Republican control of Congress.” The Democrat Party has gone so far to the left that it’s losing many of its genius members. The crazy thing is the Democrat Party doesn’t seem to care. They just keep getting more extremely ridiculous and out of touch with normal, nice Americans. (foxandfriends on 𝕏)

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

14,895 views • 5 months ago

The Democratic Party is out-of-touch and detached from the plight of hardworking people. They have little interest in understanding the values and struggles of those who bust their butts daily to make a living because their charts say the economy is great and crime is down, which is exactly why they lost. The people who voted against them and even those who disengaged are the laborers in factories, truck drivers, the trash collectors, the store clerks and stockers, the officers in uniform, the firefighters, and EMS workers, who keep the engines of our country roaring. They sustain our economy, secure our streets, and provide for their families through honest work never quite making enough but keeping their heads held high because they maintain their dignity and their values. Democrats speak a language preoccupied with credentials, meritocratic success, and cultural sensibilities that alienate those whose lives are defined not by degrees or connections but by grit, sacrifice, and community bonds, which are most Americans.
0:43

The Democratic Party is out-of-touch and detached from the plight of hardworking people. They have little interest in understanding the values and struggles of those who bust their butts daily to make a living because their charts say the economy is great and crime is down, which is exactly why they lost. The people who voted against them and even those who disengaged are the laborers in factories, truck drivers, the trash collectors, the store clerks and stockers, the officers in uniform, the firefighters, and EMS workers, who keep the engines of our country roaring. They sustain our economy, secure our streets, and provide for their families through honest work never quite making enough but keeping their heads held high because they maintain their dignity and their values. Democrats speak a language preoccupied with credentials, meritocratic success, and cultural sensibilities that alienate those whose lives are defined not by degrees or connections but by grit, sacrifice, and community bonds, which are most Americans.

Shermichael Singleton

300,328 views • 1 year ago

Reasonable Democrats are going to have to get off their couches, roll up their sleeves and start organizing real voters on the ground. We can no longer rely only on TV ads, digital spend and endorsements. Just donating from afar and complaining about the DSA won’t cut it. The DSA (Democratic Socialists of America) can beat moderates in a growing number of blue strongholds. Why? Because the DSA has patiently built an army of on-the-ground organizers — who go to meetings, help each other, study together and THEN work to turn out voters on Election Day. That army grows every day — election or no election. Their investment in real people grows (and compounds) with each election cycle. The DSA has a bigger army, every time, win or lose. But at the end of any election, all moderate Dems have for their efforts is a bunch of ads that nobody will ever see again. That’s not going to work anymore. If you are a Democrat who believes in opportunity, dignity and democracy for all — but you don’t hate rich people, cops, free enterprise, the West, Israel and the United States of America — I’m talking to you!
1:08

Reasonable Democrats are going to have to get off their couches, roll up their sleeves and start organizing real voters on the ground. We can no longer rely only on TV ads, digital spend and endorsements. Just donating from afar and complaining about the DSA won’t cut it. The DSA (Democratic Socialists of America) can beat moderates in a growing number of blue strongholds. Why? Because the DSA has patiently built an army of on-the-ground organizers — who go to meetings, help each other, study together and THEN work to turn out voters on Election Day. That army grows every day — election or no election. Their investment in real people grows (and compounds) with each election cycle. The DSA has a bigger army, every time, win or lose. But at the end of any election, all moderate Dems have for their efforts is a bunch of ads that nobody will ever see again. That’s not going to work anymore. If you are a Democrat who believes in opportunity, dignity and democracy for all — but you don’t hate rich people, cops, free enterprise, the West, Israel and the United States of America — I’m talking to you!

Van Jones

620,604 views • 2 months ago

Democrats are in full meltdown mode as their party gets hijacked by the far-left crazies. Over 60% of their primaries, moderate establishment types are getting absolutely smoked by hardcore socialists and radicals. Bernie Sanders staffers winning in New Jersey, Chris Rob types in Pennsylvania and Michigan, Graham Platner in Maine, and that James Talarico clown in Texas, the one who says God is non-binary. They try to sell these people as “normal” a humble Texas pastor or a Maine oyster farmer. Give me a break. It’s all a sham. Their real record is pure progressive extremism. A new poll shows 53% of their own voters and nearly two-thirds of independents are fed up with the direction of the party. The tail is wagging the dog, and normal Democrats are watching their party sprint off a cliff. This is what happens when you let the lunatics run the asylum. Americans aren’t buying the act anymore.
1:58

Democrats are in full meltdown mode as their party gets hijacked by the far-left crazies. Over 60% of their primaries, moderate establishment types are getting absolutely smoked by hardcore socialists and radicals. Bernie Sanders staffers winning in New Jersey, Chris Rob types in Pennsylvania and Michigan, Graham Platner in Maine, and that James Talarico clown in Texas, the one who says God is non-binary. They try to sell these people as “normal” a humble Texas pastor or a Maine oyster farmer. Give me a break. It’s all a sham. Their real record is pure progressive extremism. A new poll shows 53% of their own voters and nearly two-thirds of independents are fed up with the direction of the party. The tail is wagging the dog, and normal Democrats are watching their party sprint off a cliff. This is what happens when you let the lunatics run the asylum. Americans aren’t buying the act anymore.

Gunther Eagleman™

394,673 views • 3 months ago

Louisiana is the blueprint for the Republican Party — from Project 2025 to the Speaker of the House, the power is being built right here. So why won’t Democrats invest here too? You spent $300 million in Wisconsin, but Louisiana and Mississippi are the Blackest states in America. If Black voters are already with you 80–90% of the time, why not build power where we’re a large part of the population? It worked in Georgia. Maryland shows what happens when over 30% of the population is Black — power shifts. Either you don’t understand the math, or you don’t value the people who can actually win you elections. All that party talk is BS if the Louisiana strategy doesn’t change. Just two years ago, we had a two-term Democratic governor — because of Black voters. You need 5 million votes to win in Texas, but only 700,000 to win in Louisiana. Texas hasn’t elected a Democrat statewide since 1994. Louisiana’s had a Democratic governor three times since 2003 and a Democratic U.S. Senator up until 2014 — and the party still hasn’t invested here. Every win we’ve had came off the muscle of organizers and organizations on the ground doing the work. America is getting its ass kicked by a man from Benton, Louisiana, running the House — and the party is still asking what to do. We should be asking when the Democratic Party plans to really show up in the Deep South. Amazing convo on @richlessonspodcast — watch it now on YouTube.
2:45

Louisiana is the blueprint for the Republican Party — from Project 2025 to the Speaker of the House, the power is being built right here. So why won’t Democrats invest here too? You spent $300 million in Wisconsin, but Louisiana and Mississippi are the Blackest states in America. If Black voters are already with you 80–90% of the time, why not build power where we’re a large part of the population? It worked in Georgia. Maryland shows what happens when over 30% of the population is Black — power shifts. Either you don’t understand the math, or you don’t value the people who can actually win you elections. All that party talk is BS if the Louisiana strategy doesn’t change. Just two years ago, we had a two-term Democratic governor — because of Black voters. You need 5 million votes to win in Texas, but only 700,000 to win in Louisiana. Texas hasn’t elected a Democrat statewide since 1994. Louisiana’s had a Democratic governor three times since 2003 and a Democratic U.S. Senator up until 2014 — and the party still hasn’t invested here. Every win we’ve had came off the muscle of organizers and organizations on the ground doing the work. America is getting its ass kicked by a man from Benton, Louisiana, running the House — and the party is still asking what to do. We should be asking when the Democratic Party plans to really show up in the Deep South. Amazing convo on @richlessonspodcast — watch it now on YouTube.

Gary Chambers

70,609 views • 11 months ago

🚨 Hasan Piker and Chris Rabb Lay Out the DSA Playbook for Using the Democratic Ballot Line Against the Party This clip is a clean look at the socialist left’s bizarre frenemy relationship with the Democratic Party. Hasan opens by attacking Democrats directly. They “don’t love you,” “don’t care about you,” and “don’t care about your interests.” But he does not tell people to leave the party. He tells them the Democratic primary is the battlefield because it “determines the trajectory of the Democratic Party.” Then Chris Rabb picks up the thread. Rabb says he “identif[ies] as a democratic socialist,” but is “running as a Democrat because the system creates this narrowness.” In other words, the Democratic label is not the identity. It is the vehicle. Rabb makes that even clearer moments later. He says Democrats may share the same label “in this moment,” but “we are very different.” Then he tells voters, “You don’t have to love the Democratic Party to vote for me. I do not care because I’m not here for the party. I’m here for the people.” The result is a strange but increasingly effective hostile partnership. The DSA needs the Democratic ballot line because third-party politics is a dead end. The Democratic Party keeps absorbing candidates who openly reject it. And over time, that one-way arrangement lets the socialist left take more ground inside the party while still pretending to be outsiders. But what do Democrats actually get out of this arrangement?
2:51

🚨 Hasan Piker and Chris Rabb Lay Out the DSA Playbook for Using the Democratic Ballot Line Against the Party This clip is a clean look at the socialist left’s bizarre frenemy relationship with the Democratic Party. Hasan opens by attacking Democrats directly. They “don’t love you,” “don’t care about you,” and “don’t care about your interests.” But he does not tell people to leave the party. He tells them the Democratic primary is the battlefield because it “determines the trajectory of the Democratic Party.” Then Chris Rabb picks up the thread. Rabb says he “identif[ies] as a democratic socialist,” but is “running as a Democrat because the system creates this narrowness.” In other words, the Democratic label is not the identity. It is the vehicle. Rabb makes that even clearer moments later. He says Democrats may share the same label “in this moment,” but “we are very different.” Then he tells voters, “You don’t have to love the Democratic Party to vote for me. I do not care because I’m not here for the party. I’m here for the people.” The result is a strange but increasingly effective hostile partnership. The DSA needs the Democratic ballot line because third-party politics is a dead end. The Democratic Party keeps absorbing candidates who openly reject it. And over time, that one-way arrangement lets the socialist left take more ground inside the party while still pretending to be outsiders. But what do Democrats actually get out of this arrangement?

Stu Smith

266,177 views • 4 months ago