Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

The Election commission work is questionable without any doubt. But all happened in the supervision of the Supreme Court. I’m shocked that judges said those who have left can vote next time. It’s like saying that if you don’t have bread eat cakes. — Former CEC SY Qureshi

Shantanu

52,296 subscribers

45,087 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Comedy News & Politics Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

The remarks by SC judge that if you can’t vote this time, you vote next time is shocking behind words. It’s like Marie Antoinette saying that if you can’t have bread, eat cakes. — Former CEC SY Qureshi in conversation with SC senior advocate Kapil Sibal

The remarks by SC judge that if you can’t vote this time, you vote next time is shocking behind words. It’s like Marie Antoinette saying that if you can’t have bread, eat cakes. — Former CEC SY Qureshi in conversation with SC senior advocate Kapil Sibal

Shantanu

76,770 views • 3 months ago

BREAKING: 175 Left-Wing Activist Judges Refuse To Accept The Constitution's Clear Designation That The Supreme Court Is The Top Court In The Land. These Judges File Amici In Supreme Court Saying Lower Courts Can Ignore Their Rulings If Lower Judges Don't Agree. Andrew Branca Show

BREAKING: 175 Left-Wing Activist Judges Refuse To Accept The Constitution's Clear Designation That The Supreme Court Is The Top Court In The Land. These Judges File Amici In Supreme Court Saying Lower Courts Can Ignore Their Rulings If Lower Judges Don't Agree. Andrew Branca Show

John Basham

18,817 views • 5 months ago

This is for the first that 3 former Election Commissioner OP Rawat, SY Qureshi and Ashok Lavasa have criticised the CEC Gyanesh Kumar at same time and have agreed that onus is on the ECI to clear doubts on the objections raised by LoP Rahul Gandhi. “This tone is not acceptable”.

This is for the first that 3 former Election Commissioner OP Rawat, SY Qureshi and Ashok Lavasa have criticised the CEC Gyanesh Kumar at same time and have agreed that onus is on the ECI to clear doubts on the objections raised by LoP Rahul Gandhi. “This tone is not acceptable”.

Shantanu

147,615 views • 11 months ago

This is for all of you that want homemade bread but don’t have the time for sourdough.

This is for all of you that want homemade bread but don’t have the time for sourdough.

NukeTaco ™️🇺🇸

299,214 views • 2 months ago

Alex Phillips What struck me about the October 7th footage is that the perpetrators look a lot like many of the young men in Europe. I’m not saying that all those young Muslim men who have come into Europe are a danger, but without a doubt a percentage of them are. The question is, how many?

Alex Phillips What struck me about the October 7th footage is that the perpetrators look a lot like many of the young men in Europe. I’m not saying that all those young Muslim men who have come into Europe are a danger, but without a doubt a percentage of them are. The question is, how many?

Visegrád 24

189,812 views • 8 months ago

If what Mike Sonko is alleging here is true, then we don’t have a country, The Supreme Court of Kenya should be dissolved and all those judges should be prosecuted!!!

If what Mike Sonko is alleging here is true, then we don’t have a country, The Supreme Court of Kenya should be dissolved and all those judges should be prosecuted!!!

The Oligarch

39,661 views • 22 days ago

VIDEO | Activist and psephologist Yogendra Yadav, who was a litigant in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) case before the Supreme Court, said, "As one of the litigants, I have reasons to be disappointed, but I am shocked. Not shocked only because I was litigant and the judgment did not go in my favor. That can happen. Not shocked because I had expected a very different judgment. For the last few months, the course, the very strange course that this particular case had taken, made it absolutely clear which way things were going. I'm shocked that the Supreme Court of this country has allowed the fundamental democratic principle to be overturned. In a democracy, voters choose the government. The government cannot choose the voters. And the net effect of what the Supreme Court has done today is that now BJP shall decide who can be a voter in this country and who cannot. Technically, you might say Election Commission will decide. But because the same Supreme Court has done absolutely nothing to ensure that the Election Commission's own appointment is a non-partisan way, and given the manner in which the Election Commission behaves these days, it is absolutely true that now BJP decides who will be the voter, and on the basis of their votes, BJP will say, "We have one popular mandate." This is a complete overturning of the fundamental principle of universal adult franchise...I'm astonished that the Supreme Court of India has put its seal of approval on fundamental overturning of democratic principles."

VIDEO | Activist and psephologist Yogendra Yadav, who was a litigant in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) case before the Supreme Court, said, "As one of the litigants, I have reasons to be disappointed, but I am shocked. Not shocked only because I was litigant and the judgment did not go in my favor. That can happen. Not shocked because I had expected a very different judgment. For the last few months, the course, the very strange course that this particular case had taken, made it absolutely clear which way things were going. I'm shocked that the Supreme Court of this country has allowed the fundamental democratic principle to be overturned. In a democracy, voters choose the government. The government cannot choose the voters. And the net effect of what the Supreme Court has done today is that now BJP shall decide who can be a voter in this country and who cannot. Technically, you might say Election Commission will decide. But because the same Supreme Court has done absolutely nothing to ensure that the Election Commission's own appointment is a non-partisan way, and given the manner in which the Election Commission behaves these days, it is absolutely true that now BJP decides who will be the voter, and on the basis of their votes, BJP will say, "We have one popular mandate." This is a complete overturning of the fundamental principle of universal adult franchise...I'm astonished that the Supreme Court of India has put its seal of approval on fundamental overturning of democratic principles."

Press Trust of India

75,134 views • 2 months ago

SIR is to coverup and institutionalise Vote Chori. It happened in Haryana, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh also. — Rahul Gandhi Ji Supreme Court has upheld the SIR. Now, we hope that those who ask why Congress and Rahul Gandhi don’t go to court have got the answers.

SIR is to coverup and institutionalise Vote Chori. It happened in Haryana, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh also. — Rahul Gandhi Ji Supreme Court has upheld the SIR. Now, we hope that those who ask why Congress and Rahul Gandhi don’t go to court have got the answers.

Shantanu

122,723 views • 2 months ago

👉There's black and white proof. A CID investigation is ongoing in Karnataka. The CID has specifically asked for information on phone numbers that have been used. 👉Gyanesh Kumar is the CEC, and the CEC is not providing the information requested by the Karnataka CID. There can be no bigger indictment of the CEC than this. 👉We're going to present it in such a way that nobody in India will have any doubt that Narendra Modi has committed 'vote chori'. 👉We're going to reveal a Hydrogen bomb. We have open-and-shut proof of what we're saying. We have black and white proof. We're not saying anything without proof. Rahul Gandhi

👉There's black and white proof. A CID investigation is ongoing in Karnataka. The CID has specifically asked for information on phone numbers that have been used. 👉Gyanesh Kumar is the CEC, and the CEC is not providing the information requested by the Karnataka CID. There can be no bigger indictment of the CEC than this. 👉We're going to present it in such a way that nobody in India will have any doubt that Narendra Modi has committed 'vote chori'. 👉We're going to reveal a Hydrogen bomb. We have open-and-shut proof of what we're saying. We have black and white proof. We're not saying anything without proof. Rahul Gandhi

Supriya Shrinate

30,762 views • 10 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi: Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal says, "The Supreme Court has given a decision regarding the EVM and they have said that every citizen should have faith in the Election Commission. But, is the EC trustworthy? After the first phase, the data on the EC website, about the vote percentage, was uploaded after 11 days. It only shows the percentage of the votes, not the number... The Election Commission should clarify via a press conference why it took 11 days... When this doubt arises, then the faith of the people decreases..."

#WATCH | Delhi: Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal says, "The Supreme Court has given a decision regarding the EVM and they have said that every citizen should have faith in the Election Commission. But, is the EC trustworthy? After the first phase, the data on the EC website, about the vote percentage, was uploaded after 11 days. It only shows the percentage of the votes, not the number... The Election Commission should clarify via a press conference why it took 11 days... When this doubt arises, then the faith of the people decreases..."

ANI

331,935 views • 2 years ago

Are you for sure an Election Commission or a BJP letterhead???? Do you mean to say since independence there has never been a Free and Fair Election in West Bengal?? There was a time when we had an Election Commission and CEC TN Seshan 🗿who said: We will stop elections in Bihar even if there is 1% doubt or rigging and start all over again. Compare that to today, we have nothing but a Selection Commission of BJP.

Are you for sure an Election Commission or a BJP letterhead???? Do you mean to say since independence there has never been a Free and Fair Election in West Bengal?? There was a time when we had an Election Commission and CEC TN Seshan 🗿who said: We will stop elections in Bihar even if there is 1% doubt or rigging and start all over again. Compare that to today, we have nothing but a Selection Commission of BJP.

D

49,635 views • 4 months ago

VIDEO | Here's what advocate Prashant Bhushan said on Supreme Court rejecting pleas seeking complete cross-verification of votes cast using #EVMs with Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (#VVPAT). "The court has not accepted our demands but has directed the Election Commission to examine that if bar codes can be put on VVPAT slips, so that the VVPAT slips can be mechanically counted by a counting machine. Also, secondly, they have said that the symbol loading unit which loads the symbol constituency by constituency should be sealed and kept available for at least 45 days after the election. Thirdly, they have said that every candidate who comes second or third can make a demand for examining the burnt memory of the EVM and a technical expert team of the Election Commission will have to examine that, but the cost of that will have to be paid by the candidate. With these directions, the court has disposed of the petition." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

VIDEO | Here's what advocate Prashant Bhushan said on Supreme Court rejecting pleas seeking complete cross-verification of votes cast using #EVMs with Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (#VVPAT). "The court has not accepted our demands but has directed the Election Commission to examine that if bar codes can be put on VVPAT slips, so that the VVPAT slips can be mechanically counted by a counting machine. Also, secondly, they have said that the symbol loading unit which loads the symbol constituency by constituency should be sealed and kept available for at least 45 days after the election. Thirdly, they have said that every candidate who comes second or third can make a demand for examining the burnt memory of the EVM and a technical expert team of the Election Commission will have to examine that, but the cost of that will have to be paid by the candidate. With these directions, the court has disposed of the petition." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

128,564 views • 2 years ago

BESSENT: “What the Supreme Court said is that the President cannot use IEEPA to do this, he does have other authorities. It's very interesting that the Supreme Court said that the President can't raise $1 of revenue with tariffs, but he can put on a full embargo." looks like the admin will fight very hard to keep tariffs using any justification they can legally provide

BESSENT: “What the Supreme Court said is that the President cannot use IEEPA to do this, he does have other authorities. It's very interesting that the Supreme Court said that the President can't raise $1 of revenue with tariffs, but he can put on a full embargo." looks like the admin will fight very hard to keep tariffs using any justification they can legally provide

amit

111,812 views • 5 months ago

Jasmine Crockett says it’s important that she be in Senate — because as an attorney herself, she can finally exercise the needed oversight of the Supreme Court: “The highest court in the land is the only one that does not have any type of ethics that they have to follow." 🤡🌎

Jasmine Crockett says it’s important that she be in Senate — because as an attorney herself, she can finally exercise the needed oversight of the Supreme Court: “The highest court in the land is the only one that does not have any type of ethics that they have to follow." 🤡🌎

Western Lensman

248,717 views • 7 months ago

Luttig: The Supreme Court cut the heart and soul out of America with this abominable decision… The defining maxim of America has been that no one is above the law. That can never be said about America again after this decision from the Supreme Court. Without any question whatsoever, the Supreme Court held that the President of the United States, and in particular, the former President of the United States Donald Trump, is above the law.

Luttig: The Supreme Court cut the heart and soul out of America with this abominable decision… The defining maxim of America has been that no one is above the law. That can never be said about America again after this decision from the Supreme Court. Without any question whatsoever, the Supreme Court held that the President of the United States, and in particular, the former President of the United States Donald Trump, is above the law.

Acyn

679,696 views • 2 years ago

For those of you on the left that are equating the farm subsidies with “welfare checks” here’s a little tutorial. There’s a saying that goes a little something like this “Don’t mess where you eat” but I have little faith you can’t understand that concept either.

For those of you on the left that are equating the farm subsidies with “welfare checks” here’s a little tutorial. There’s a saying that goes a little something like this “Don’t mess where you eat” but I have little faith you can’t understand that concept either.

MAGA X Times Daily News 🇺🇸

37,304 views • 8 months ago

Miles Taylor: “If you go back statistically and look, this president has been ruled to have done illegal things, more illegal things in his first year than any president in modern history. That is the data.” Betsy McCaughey: “When you say ruled —” Miles Taylor: “Dozens of federal judges…” Betsy McCaughey: “Yes… so many federal judges, lower court federal judges who will be overturned.” “Let me just point out that the Supreme Court has already slapped the hands of most of those lower court judges for imposing national injunctions which they have no authority to do.” NUKED!

Miles Taylor: “If you go back statistically and look, this president has been ruled to have done illegal things, more illegal things in his first year than any president in modern history. That is the data.” Betsy McCaughey: “When you say ruled —” Miles Taylor: “Dozens of federal judges…” Betsy McCaughey: “Yes… so many federal judges, lower court federal judges who will be overturned.” “Let me just point out that the Supreme Court has already slapped the hands of most of those lower court judges for imposing national injunctions which they have no authority to do.” NUKED!

RedWave Press

649,553 views • 7 months ago

F*** The Colorado Supreme Court! Yeah I said it. All those judges should be removed from the bench! Trump was Disqualified from the 2024 Presidential Ballot! He wasn’t convicted of any crime so what happened to innocent until proven guilty? Election Interference SHARE THIS FACT! People can still write his name in. It’s not a crime if you write his name in. I stand with President Trump!

F*** The Colorado Supreme Court! Yeah I said it. All those judges should be removed from the bench! Trump was Disqualified from the 2024 Presidential Ballot! He wasn’t convicted of any crime so what happened to innocent until proven guilty? Election Interference SHARE THIS FACT! People can still write his name in. It’s not a crime if you write his name in. I stand with President Trump!

Terrence K. Williams

546,018 views • 2 years ago

Crockett: You have a party that has sided with The Supreme Court that said it is ok to criminalize homelessness and it's ok for people to go hungry.. If that's the America that you feel like is great, you do have a candidate and a party that will give you all of that hell

Crockett: You have a party that has sided with The Supreme Court that said it is ok to criminalize homelessness and it's ok for people to go hungry.. If that's the America that you feel like is great, you do have a candidate and a party that will give you all of that hell

Acyn

110,166 views • 2 years ago