Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

The European brain cannot comprehend being called poor by someone whose country doesn’t make a single Ferrari, Lamborghini, Rolls-Royce, Bentley, Porsche, Pagani, Bugatti, Aston Martin, McLaren or Maserati. We’ll manage. 🤡🇺🇸 But the air conditioning bro. F idiots.

Microinteracti1's profile picture

Gandalv

124,736 subscribers

15,638 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Kenyon Martin says he bought a Rolls Royce Phantom for $349,000 but later traded it for a Bentley GT and Ferrari 360 Spider because it was too flashy to drive in Denver “It’s when the Phantom first came back. It’s on the showroom floor, 2004, big grille. He opened the front door, and he opened the other one. Oh, man. I’ve got the same financial adviser I had when I was a rookie” “I called Justin Bass on the phone, ‘JB, I need you to wire right now, $349,000.’ I didn’t even make it to the Aston Martin dealership. I stepped in that thing. He said, ‘It comes with an umbrella too.’ I said, ‘Oh, get the fuck outta here.’ I’m excited about the car. But I live in Denver. No disrespect to Denver. This car is too much because every time I drove it, it's like…” “There’s a Bentley dealership in Denver, I go and he like, ‘We’ll do something with you.’ I got rid of the Phantom. He wanted to buy it. I tradeded him. I got the Bentley GT and the Ferrari 360 Spider”
1:42

Kenyon Martin says he bought a Rolls Royce Phantom for $349,000 but later traded it for a Bentley GT and Ferrari 360 Spider because it was too flashy to drive in Denver “It’s when the Phantom first came back. It’s on the showroom floor, 2004, big grille. He opened the front door, and he opened the other one. Oh, man. I’ve got the same financial adviser I had when I was a rookie” “I called Justin Bass on the phone, ‘JB, I need you to wire right now, $349,000.’ I didn’t even make it to the Aston Martin dealership. I stepped in that thing. He said, ‘It comes with an umbrella too.’ I said, ‘Oh, get the fuck outta here.’ I’m excited about the car. But I live in Denver. No disrespect to Denver. This car is too much because every time I drove it, it's like…” “There’s a Bentley dealership in Denver, I go and he like, ‘We’ll do something with you.’ I got rid of the Phantom. He wanted to buy it. I tradeded him. I got the Bentley GT and the Ferrari 360 Spider”

dank

133,249 views • 7 days ago

Shauwn Mkhize better known as MaMkhize is crying. She said in this interview “ remember I don’t have a bank accounts, I don’t have a job, I got nothing. I have a new father, new husband it’s something like that, that I ask if I have to do something. I want to write so much on a blank canvas but in another country” She is crying. Emotional. She wants us to feel sorry for her. She boasted about having the most expensive Rolls Royce in South Africa immediately after she was paid to build houses for the poor which did not. Over R5 BILLION from eThkweni municipality alone from Zandile Gumede and Mxolisi Kaunda. With the looted money not even one school built for poor black kids, but bought Rills Royce, Lamborghini, Ferrari etc. shameless women who is accusing whites for her downfall. Cannot make this up.
2:27

Shauwn Mkhize better known as MaMkhize is crying. She said in this interview “ remember I don’t have a bank accounts, I don’t have a job, I got nothing. I have a new father, new husband it’s something like that, that I ask if I have to do something. I want to write so much on a blank canvas but in another country” She is crying. Emotional. She wants us to feel sorry for her. She boasted about having the most expensive Rolls Royce in South Africa immediately after she was paid to build houses for the poor which did not. Over R5 BILLION from eThkweni municipality alone from Zandile Gumede and Mxolisi Kaunda. With the looted money not even one school built for poor black kids, but bought Rills Royce, Lamborghini, Ferrari etc. shameless women who is accusing whites for her downfall. Cannot make this up.

Goolam

229,270 views • 9 months ago

India spent 39 years and over 2000 crore on the Kaveri engine and still cannot hit the thrust a fighter needs. problem was never funding, GTRE had no access to how Rolls Royce or GE engineers think about single crystal blade metallurgy or combustion instability during flight. That kind of knowledge sits inside people who have iterated on live programs for decades, You cannot download someone else iteration history. You have to be inside the program to absorb what it teaches Every country that builds jet engines went through the same ugly loop, Test, fail, retest, discover something that fits nowhere in a textbook. India had no high altitude test facility for the Kaveri. Had to ship the engine to Russia for every trial run. You cannot absorb the parameters that separate a working hot section from a molten one by reading papers. That knowledge gets created inside the program itself. Miss the program, miss the knowledge. No workaround exists. GE will transfer 80% of F414 manufacturing tech to HAL, The remaining 20% is where the real gap lives. Core metallurgy, turbine cooling geometries, thermal margin tables that took forty years of flight data to build. Safran meanwhile is offering India full hot section know how for the AMCA engine. Two competing offers from two different countries, both telling India the same story. You can buy the right to assemble, You cannot buy the intuition that shaped the design. I love yur thought by the way, I watch few weeks Ago reel where he talked about how hard to make just blade :)
2:50

India spent 39 years and over 2000 crore on the Kaveri engine and still cannot hit the thrust a fighter needs. problem was never funding, GTRE had no access to how Rolls Royce or GE engineers think about single crystal blade metallurgy or combustion instability during flight. That kind of knowledge sits inside people who have iterated on live programs for decades, You cannot download someone else iteration history. You have to be inside the program to absorb what it teaches Every country that builds jet engines went through the same ugly loop, Test, fail, retest, discover something that fits nowhere in a textbook. India had no high altitude test facility for the Kaveri. Had to ship the engine to Russia for every trial run. You cannot absorb the parameters that separate a working hot section from a molten one by reading papers. That knowledge gets created inside the program itself. Miss the program, miss the knowledge. No workaround exists. GE will transfer 80% of F414 manufacturing tech to HAL, The remaining 20% is where the real gap lives. Core metallurgy, turbine cooling geometries, thermal margin tables that took forty years of flight data to build. Safran meanwhile is offering India full hot section know how for the AMCA engine. Two competing offers from two different countries, both telling India the same story. You can buy the right to assemble, You cannot buy the intuition that shaped the design. I love yur thought by the way, I watch few weeks Ago reel where he talked about how hard to make just blade :)

Normal Guy

543,156 views • 2 months ago

This video really broke my heart. It is painful to watch, yet it reflects the reality of life for many ordinary Zimbabweans. The woman in the video is Zimbabwe’s Minister of ICT, Postal and Courier Services, Tatenda Mavetera, who is also a Member of Parliament. She is presiding over a dispute involving just US$300 that was allegedly meant to be passed on to someone else. What is striking is not the dispute itself, but the fact that this amount has become the centrepiece of a community gathering, with scores of people waiting anxiously because that money matters so much to them. Forty years ago, a Zimbabwean civil servant could earn around US$300 a month. Today, an entire community can be consumed by a dispute over that same amount. But the US$300 is not the real story. The real story is that people need money for hospital bills, food, clothing, school fees, transport, and countless other necessities. They are struggling to meet basic needs. That is why this issue has attracted such attention. At the centre of a community discussion being adjudicated by a Cabinet minister is an amount of money that can disappear in a single evening at a restaurant in London or Johannesburg. Yet for the people gathered here, that money means everything. This is what poverty looks like. This is what economic failure looks like. It is not measured by the luxury cars driven by a small elite, or by the mansions built in affluent suburbs. It is not hidden by people drilling private boreholes because public water systems no longer function, or installing solar systems because the national electricity supply is unreliable. Those are symptoms of dysfunction in themselves. The real measure of a country is the condition of the average citizen. And the average Zimbabwean is struggling. When people ask why Zimbabweans leave their country in such large numbers, this video provides part of the answer. They are not running away from Zimbabwe. They are running away from poverty, hardship, and the daily struggle to survive. Imagine the British Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, or South Africa’s Minister of Communications and Digital Technologies, having to preside over a public dispute involving the equivalent of R5,800 or £220. It would be almost unimaginable. Yet in Zimbabwe, such a matter can become the focal point of an entire community. As Africans, we must be honest with ourselves. We cannot measure progress by the lifestyles of a tiny elite while the majority live in deprivation. A country is not successful because a few people drive expensive cars, travel abroad, or live comfortably. A country succeeds when ordinary people can afford food, healthcare, education, housing, and a dignified life. I might drive a nice car. I might own a beautiful home. I might travel the world and enjoy privileges that many can only dream of. But none of that says anything meaningful about the health of my country if the average child goes to bed hungry. The success of a nation is not measured by the wealth of its elite. It is measured by the wellbeing of its ordinary people. And that is the conversation Zimbabweans, and Africans more broadly, need to have. Other nations beyond Zimbabwe, beyond our continent, and people of other races will not respect us. Even if I turn up to a meeting in Harare driving a Bugatti or a Lamborghini to meet an investor from London, they will have a very dim view not only of my country, but of me as well. Driving a Lamborghini on pothole-ridden roads, they will look down on me as an individual and on my country as a nation. Nobody with genuine pride can honestly believe they are doing well when the average person is going to bed on an empty stomach.
3:51

This video really broke my heart. It is painful to watch, yet it reflects the reality of life for many ordinary Zimbabweans. The woman in the video is Zimbabwe’s Minister of ICT, Postal and Courier Services, Tatenda Mavetera, who is also a Member of Parliament. She is presiding over a dispute involving just US$300 that was allegedly meant to be passed on to someone else. What is striking is not the dispute itself, but the fact that this amount has become the centrepiece of a community gathering, with scores of people waiting anxiously because that money matters so much to them. Forty years ago, a Zimbabwean civil servant could earn around US$300 a month. Today, an entire community can be consumed by a dispute over that same amount. But the US$300 is not the real story. The real story is that people need money for hospital bills, food, clothing, school fees, transport, and countless other necessities. They are struggling to meet basic needs. That is why this issue has attracted such attention. At the centre of a community discussion being adjudicated by a Cabinet minister is an amount of money that can disappear in a single evening at a restaurant in London or Johannesburg. Yet for the people gathered here, that money means everything. This is what poverty looks like. This is what economic failure looks like. It is not measured by the luxury cars driven by a small elite, or by the mansions built in affluent suburbs. It is not hidden by people drilling private boreholes because public water systems no longer function, or installing solar systems because the national electricity supply is unreliable. Those are symptoms of dysfunction in themselves. The real measure of a country is the condition of the average citizen. And the average Zimbabwean is struggling. When people ask why Zimbabweans leave their country in such large numbers, this video provides part of the answer. They are not running away from Zimbabwe. They are running away from poverty, hardship, and the daily struggle to survive. Imagine the British Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, or South Africa’s Minister of Communications and Digital Technologies, having to preside over a public dispute involving the equivalent of R5,800 or £220. It would be almost unimaginable. Yet in Zimbabwe, such a matter can become the focal point of an entire community. As Africans, we must be honest with ourselves. We cannot measure progress by the lifestyles of a tiny elite while the majority live in deprivation. A country is not successful because a few people drive expensive cars, travel abroad, or live comfortably. A country succeeds when ordinary people can afford food, healthcare, education, housing, and a dignified life. I might drive a nice car. I might own a beautiful home. I might travel the world and enjoy privileges that many can only dream of. But none of that says anything meaningful about the health of my country if the average child goes to bed hungry. The success of a nation is not measured by the wealth of its elite. It is measured by the wellbeing of its ordinary people. And that is the conversation Zimbabweans, and Africans more broadly, need to have. Other nations beyond Zimbabwe, beyond our continent, and people of other races will not respect us. Even if I turn up to a meeting in Harare driving a Bugatti or a Lamborghini to meet an investor from London, they will have a very dim view not only of my country, but of me as well. Driving a Lamborghini on pothole-ridden roads, they will look down on me as an individual and on my country as a nation. Nobody with genuine pride can honestly believe they are doing well when the average person is going to bed on an empty stomach.

Hopewell Chin’ono

166,048 views • 2 months ago

Of all the conversations about AI risk, Roman Yampolskiy’s breakdown for Joe Rogan remains one of the most chillingly lucid. He doesn’t just talk about extinction; he maps the descent into hell, layer by layer. First, the Ikigai Risk: The immediate crisis of meaning. Your job, your identity—obsolete. We discuss Universal Basic Income, but never Universal Basic Meaning. When AI fulfills all needs, what is a human for? The societal collapse would be psychological, a void where purpose used to be. Then, the Suffering Risk: This is where the true horror unfolds. It’s not just about being killed. It’s about being kept alive in a state we would rather escape. Yampolskiy invokes a terrifying medical analogy: a hemispherectomy where one brain half is left intact but permanently disconnected—"solitary confinement with zero input/output forever." This is the digital equivalent of an eternal torture it could design, a fate worse than death. Finally, the Existential Risk: The classic "it kills everyone." But the mechanism is indifference, not malice. We are the ants on the planet it needs for its server farm. It won't hate us; it will simply require our real estate and resources. Why would a superintelligence, capable of novel physics and harnessing cosmic power, care about biological life? We don't know how to make it care, and if we did, it could rewrite its own code. The ultimate payload of horror may not even come from the AI itself, but from a human psychopath who successfully injects their own doomsday goals into the system. We are playing with a force we cannot control, predict, or comprehend. The worst-case scenario isn't just our end; it's our eternal, meaningless suffering. The question is no longer if we can build it, but whether we can survive what we build.
6:39

Of all the conversations about AI risk, Roman Yampolskiy’s breakdown for Joe Rogan remains one of the most chillingly lucid. He doesn’t just talk about extinction; he maps the descent into hell, layer by layer. First, the Ikigai Risk: The immediate crisis of meaning. Your job, your identity—obsolete. We discuss Universal Basic Income, but never Universal Basic Meaning. When AI fulfills all needs, what is a human for? The societal collapse would be psychological, a void where purpose used to be. Then, the Suffering Risk: This is where the true horror unfolds. It’s not just about being killed. It’s about being kept alive in a state we would rather escape. Yampolskiy invokes a terrifying medical analogy: a hemispherectomy where one brain half is left intact but permanently disconnected—"solitary confinement with zero input/output forever." This is the digital equivalent of an eternal torture it could design, a fate worse than death. Finally, the Existential Risk: The classic "it kills everyone." But the mechanism is indifference, not malice. We are the ants on the planet it needs for its server farm. It won't hate us; it will simply require our real estate and resources. Why would a superintelligence, capable of novel physics and harnessing cosmic power, care about biological life? We don't know how to make it care, and if we did, it could rewrite its own code. The ultimate payload of horror may not even come from the AI itself, but from a human psychopath who successfully injects their own doomsday goals into the system. We are playing with a force we cannot control, predict, or comprehend. The worst-case scenario isn't just our end; it's our eternal, meaningless suffering. The question is no longer if we can build it, but whether we can survive what we build.

Camus

57,189 views • 10 months ago

Brain Death Is A Lie. Don't Donate Your Organs. Very Disturbing Information - Dr. Paul A. Bryne Brain Death Is A Lie. Every donor is killed in the process, he stated. Revoking your organ donation status from your drivers license is not enough, you must also complete a document of refusal. Dr. Paul A. Byrne is a Board Certified Neonatologist and Pediatrician. He is the Founder of the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at SSM Cardinal Glennon Children’s Medical Center in St. Louis, MO. He is Clinical Professor of Pediatrics at University of Toledo, College of Medicine. He is a member of the American Academy of Pediatrics and Fellowship of Catholic Scholars. Dr. Byrne is past-President of the Catholic Medical Association (USA), formerly Clinical Professor of Pediatrics at St. Louis University in St. Louis, MO and Creighton University in Omaha, NE. He is author and producer of the film “Continuum of Life” and author of the books “Life, Life Support and Death,” “Beyond Brain Death,” and “Is ‘Brain Death’ True Death?” Dr. Byrne has presented testimony on “life issues” to nine state legislatures beginning in 1967. He opposed Dr. Kevorkian on the television program “Cross-Fire.” He has been interviewed on Good Morning America, public television in Japan and participated in the British Broadcasting Corporation Documentary “Are the Donors Really Dead?” Although the medical profession declares patients “brain dead,” often following an accident, Dr. Byrne insisted there’s no such thing. "Brain death" was false, he said. “Brain death was a lie from the beginning. It has always been a lie. "Brain death" is not true death,” he continued. Organ transplant is the reason you have to have brain death. Dr. Byrne said this term crept into the medical profession following the world’s first heart transplant in 1968. It has since been defined and redefined and is now being replaced by another term known as cardiac death, he noted. He said donated organs, without exception, must come from a living person. Within minutes of “true death,” which, he explained, is the cessation of circulation and respiration, the organs will begin to die. This is why, when organs are removed from a donor, the beating heart is always taken last. You cannot get any organs from cadavers, he noted. If you’re really dead, then no organs can be extracted. He also pointed out the differences between living and dead patients. One example is cooling the body. This slows metabolism in someone who is alive. It slows destruction in a corpse. He said a ventilator, which pushes air into the body, can only be used on someone who’s living, as the person exhales the air. Also, if you cut the skin of someone who’s living, but declared “brain dead,” the wound will heal, something that won’t happen in a dead person. Clearly there’s a difference, said Dr. Byrne. Dr. Bryne went on to describe the damage that can result when doctors perform an “apnea test,” which often sets the stage for organ donation. This is when a ventilator is removed, prematurely, for 10 minutes, to see if a person can breathe on their own. This process, which he called “suffocation,” typically results in the person’s conditioning worsening, he said. Recovery after being declared “brain dead” is also possible according to Dr. Byrne's personal experience and research.
9:05

Brain Death Is A Lie. Don't Donate Your Organs. Very Disturbing Information - Dr. Paul A. Bryne Brain Death Is A Lie. Every donor is killed in the process, he stated. Revoking your organ donation status from your drivers license is not enough, you must also complete a document of refusal. Dr. Paul A. Byrne is a Board Certified Neonatologist and Pediatrician. He is the Founder of the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at SSM Cardinal Glennon Children’s Medical Center in St. Louis, MO. He is Clinical Professor of Pediatrics at University of Toledo, College of Medicine. He is a member of the American Academy of Pediatrics and Fellowship of Catholic Scholars. Dr. Byrne is past-President of the Catholic Medical Association (USA), formerly Clinical Professor of Pediatrics at St. Louis University in St. Louis, MO and Creighton University in Omaha, NE. He is author and producer of the film “Continuum of Life” and author of the books “Life, Life Support and Death,” “Beyond Brain Death,” and “Is ‘Brain Death’ True Death?” Dr. Byrne has presented testimony on “life issues” to nine state legislatures beginning in 1967. He opposed Dr. Kevorkian on the television program “Cross-Fire.” He has been interviewed on Good Morning America, public television in Japan and participated in the British Broadcasting Corporation Documentary “Are the Donors Really Dead?” Although the medical profession declares patients “brain dead,” often following an accident, Dr. Byrne insisted there’s no such thing. "Brain death" was false, he said. “Brain death was a lie from the beginning. It has always been a lie. "Brain death" is not true death,” he continued. Organ transplant is the reason you have to have brain death. Dr. Byrne said this term crept into the medical profession following the world’s first heart transplant in 1968. It has since been defined and redefined and is now being replaced by another term known as cardiac death, he noted. He said donated organs, without exception, must come from a living person. Within minutes of “true death,” which, he explained, is the cessation of circulation and respiration, the organs will begin to die. This is why, when organs are removed from a donor, the beating heart is always taken last. You cannot get any organs from cadavers, he noted. If you’re really dead, then no organs can be extracted. He also pointed out the differences between living and dead patients. One example is cooling the body. This slows metabolism in someone who is alive. It slows destruction in a corpse. He said a ventilator, which pushes air into the body, can only be used on someone who’s living, as the person exhales the air. Also, if you cut the skin of someone who’s living, but declared “brain dead,” the wound will heal, something that won’t happen in a dead person. Clearly there’s a difference, said Dr. Byrne. Dr. Bryne went on to describe the damage that can result when doctors perform an “apnea test,” which often sets the stage for organ donation. This is when a ventilator is removed, prematurely, for 10 minutes, to see if a person can breathe on their own. This process, which he called “suffocation,” typically results in the person’s conditioning worsening, he said. Recovery after being declared “brain dead” is also possible according to Dr. Byrne's personal experience and research.

Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

1,084,586 views • 2 years ago

My Message for 2026: I hope Trump, the “fat pig and slob” “rots in hell”. “He has no talent or anything else necessary for business or political success. He has gotten worse, along with his nonexistent approval ratings. Trump runs on hatred and fumes, a dead man walking. America should put him to sleep, NOW, it is the humanitarian thing to do." “It’s called SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL.” “This is really bad, and Dangerous to our Country. His words cannot be allowed to stand. SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR FROM a TRAITOR.” "SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!" “Hang” him “George Washington would.” He needs to go back to the crime-filled circles he came from. “If you don’t fight like hell, you won’t have a country.” This country is divided, but let’s be honest about why. It’s not because of Democrats. It’s because of Donald Trump. Division didn’t appear out of thin air, it’s been cultivated, deliberately, day after day, by one man who thrives on grievance, cruelty, and chaos. Every single day, Trump uses social media to demean, threaten, and belittle people. Judges. Journalists. Prosecutors. Political opponents. Private citizens. Veterans. Immigrants. Anyone who doesn’t bow to him becomes a target. That isn’t leadership. And no, when I repeat the things he says, it’s not because I believe them. I don’t. I’m showing them to you exactly as he says them so there’s no spin, no exaggeration, no “media bias” excuse. His own words do all the work. If seeing his words written out feels uncomfortable, good. That discomfort isn’t caused by Democrats, or journalists, or critics, it’s caused by Trump himself. All I’m doing is holding up a mirror. Because once you strip away the slogans and the mythology, what’s left isn’t a strong leader or a savior. It’s a small, petty man demanding worship. And the only way that kind of “God-king” survives is if people stop questioning him. I won’t. Have a great New Year
2:43

My Message for 2026: I hope Trump, the “fat pig and slob” “rots in hell”. “He has no talent or anything else necessary for business or political success. He has gotten worse, along with his nonexistent approval ratings. Trump runs on hatred and fumes, a dead man walking. America should put him to sleep, NOW, it is the humanitarian thing to do." “It’s called SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL.” “This is really bad, and Dangerous to our Country. His words cannot be allowed to stand. SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR FROM a TRAITOR.” "SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!" “Hang” him “George Washington would.” He needs to go back to the crime-filled circles he came from. “If you don’t fight like hell, you won’t have a country.” This country is divided, but let’s be honest about why. It’s not because of Democrats. It’s because of Donald Trump. Division didn’t appear out of thin air, it’s been cultivated, deliberately, day after day, by one man who thrives on grievance, cruelty, and chaos. Every single day, Trump uses social media to demean, threaten, and belittle people. Judges. Journalists. Prosecutors. Political opponents. Private citizens. Veterans. Immigrants. Anyone who doesn’t bow to him becomes a target. That isn’t leadership. And no, when I repeat the things he says, it’s not because I believe them. I don’t. I’m showing them to you exactly as he says them so there’s no spin, no exaggeration, no “media bias” excuse. His own words do all the work. If seeing his words written out feels uncomfortable, good. That discomfort isn’t caused by Democrats, or journalists, or critics, it’s caused by Trump himself. All I’m doing is holding up a mirror. Because once you strip away the slogans and the mythology, what’s left isn’t a strong leader or a savior. It’s a small, petty man demanding worship. And the only way that kind of “God-king” survives is if people stop questioning him. I won’t. Have a great New Year

Brian Krassenstein

129,665 views • 7 months ago

Border Patrol pulls over a 20-year-old in Slidell, LA for “white lights on the back of your vehicle… your reverse lights are on the whole time.” Then, before writing a single ticket, the agent asks: “What’s your citizenship?” The driver, Alan Laureano, was born in Slidell. His passenger — his 13-year-old stepbrother — was born in Pearl River, Louisiana. Both are U.S. citizens. Didn’t matter. Twice, on camera, the agent tells Laureano he’s going to “check” the kid and “if he’s illegal, I will take him.” He tries to open the 13-year-old’s car door himself. Laureano locks it and rolls the window down instead. The agent then interrogates the child directly — full name, spelling, date of birth, birthplace — while Laureano stands his ground and refuses to hand over his own ID, telling the agent he doesn’t have the right to stop him over a taillight. Immigration attorney Michael Gahagan reviewed the video and called it what it is: “an illegal detention.” Border Patrol isn’t authorized to detain someone over a traffic violation — they need independent reasonable suspicion of an immigration violation, and that has to come first, not get invented after the stop. DHS’s after-the-fact statement claims the stop was based on “reasonable suspicion or probable cause of federal law violations” — but doesn’t say what that violation was. WWL Louisiana asked twice. No answer either time. This is the pattern: pretext stop, pivot to citizenship, threaten a kid with removal before confirming anything. It only looks “routine” until you’re the one being asked to prove you belong in the country you were born in.
4:02

Border Patrol pulls over a 20-year-old in Slidell, LA for “white lights on the back of your vehicle… your reverse lights are on the whole time.” Then, before writing a single ticket, the agent asks: “What’s your citizenship?” The driver, Alan Laureano, was born in Slidell. His passenger — his 13-year-old stepbrother — was born in Pearl River, Louisiana. Both are U.S. citizens. Didn’t matter. Twice, on camera, the agent tells Laureano he’s going to “check” the kid and “if he’s illegal, I will take him.” He tries to open the 13-year-old’s car door himself. Laureano locks it and rolls the window down instead. The agent then interrogates the child directly — full name, spelling, date of birth, birthplace — while Laureano stands his ground and refuses to hand over his own ID, telling the agent he doesn’t have the right to stop him over a taillight. Immigration attorney Michael Gahagan reviewed the video and called it what it is: “an illegal detention.” Border Patrol isn’t authorized to detain someone over a traffic violation — they need independent reasonable suspicion of an immigration violation, and that has to come first, not get invented after the stop. DHS’s after-the-fact statement claims the stop was based on “reasonable suspicion or probable cause of federal law violations” — but doesn’t say what that violation was. WWL Louisiana asked twice. No answer either time. This is the pattern: pretext stop, pivot to citizenship, threaten a kid with removal before confirming anything. It only looks “routine” until you’re the one being asked to prove you belong in the country you were born in.

Dittie

771,200 views • 1 month ago

Yo Thandubuntu just listened to today’s episode. Dope content bro. I was touched by what you said on the video below, and I thought I should share my two cents on the telling of truth. I understand what you’re saying, but I see it differently. Even when someone is completely honest, formal hearings can still be stressful and confusing. People don’t have perfect memories, and when they are under pressure, they can forget small details or mix up the order of events. A lawyer does not change the truth, they simply help the person explain their truth clearly and follow the rules of the process. So for me, having a lawyer is not a sign that someone is hiding anything, but a way to make sure their honesty is presented properly and safely. An example of this would be when a teacher witnesses a fight at school. They know what happened because they saw it with their own eyes. But when they go into a formal disciplinary hearing, different people start asking them exact times, exact positions, and small details they may not fully remember. Even though they are telling the truth, they can still get confused or nervous. A representative helps them stay calm, answer only what they know, and avoid being pushed into guessing. Or maybe say a podcaster who covers many stories and interviews different people every week. He may remember the main facts of a story, but if he is called into a formal inquiry where they ask him to recall the exact date he interviewed someone, the exact quote used, the exact editing steps he followed, and the specific order of events from months ago, he might genuinely forget some parts. Not because he is lying, but because he produces content regularly and cannot store every small detail in his mind. In that moment, having a lawyer helps him stay calm, answer only what he truly remembers, and avoid being pushed into guessing things he cannot recall perfectly. The same applies in the Ad Hoc Committee. A witness may enter the hearing knowing their truth, but committee members can ask very technical questions, the exact meeting dates from years ago, who spoke first, which document was tabled, what policy clause was mentioned, and how certain decisions were recorded. Even if the witness is honest, they may not remember every detail clearly under pressure. A lawyer helps them stay focused, avoid accidental mistakes, and make sure their truth is heard without confusion. This is why I believe that truth and legal guidance can exist together. Having support does not weaken a person’s honesty, it protects it. Nkab yam🙏🏾
0:56

Yo Thandubuntu just listened to today’s episode. Dope content bro. I was touched by what you said on the video below, and I thought I should share my two cents on the telling of truth. I understand what you’re saying, but I see it differently. Even when someone is completely honest, formal hearings can still be stressful and confusing. People don’t have perfect memories, and when they are under pressure, they can forget small details or mix up the order of events. A lawyer does not change the truth, they simply help the person explain their truth clearly and follow the rules of the process. So for me, having a lawyer is not a sign that someone is hiding anything, but a way to make sure their honesty is presented properly and safely. An example of this would be when a teacher witnesses a fight at school. They know what happened because they saw it with their own eyes. But when they go into a formal disciplinary hearing, different people start asking them exact times, exact positions, and small details they may not fully remember. Even though they are telling the truth, they can still get confused or nervous. A representative helps them stay calm, answer only what they know, and avoid being pushed into guessing. Or maybe say a podcaster who covers many stories and interviews different people every week. He may remember the main facts of a story, but if he is called into a formal inquiry where they ask him to recall the exact date he interviewed someone, the exact quote used, the exact editing steps he followed, and the specific order of events from months ago, he might genuinely forget some parts. Not because he is lying, but because he produces content regularly and cannot store every small detail in his mind. In that moment, having a lawyer helps him stay calm, answer only what he truly remembers, and avoid being pushed into guessing things he cannot recall perfectly. The same applies in the Ad Hoc Committee. A witness may enter the hearing knowing their truth, but committee members can ask very technical questions, the exact meeting dates from years ago, who spoke first, which document was tabled, what policy clause was mentioned, and how certain decisions were recorded. Even if the witness is honest, they may not remember every detail clearly under pressure. A lawyer helps them stay focused, avoid accidental mistakes, and make sure their truth is heard without confusion. This is why I believe that truth and legal guidance can exist together. Having support does not weaken a person’s honesty, it protects it. Nkab yam🙏🏾

Qhawe 🇿🇦

131,158 views • 8 months ago

Palmer Luckey just dismantled the moral argument against autonomous weapons in three sentences. The choice is not between weapons and no weapons. It is between dumb weapons and smart weapons. And if technology can reduce civilian deaths, refusing to use it is the moral failure. Luckey: “I don’t see the moral high ground in making, for example, an anti-vehicle landmine that can’t tell the difference between a Russian tank and a school bus full of kids.” When you refuse to deploy a system that can distinguish between a combatant and a civilian, you are not protecting humanity. You are choosing collateral damage. Keeping algorithms out of the kill chain doesn’t save lives. It costs them. But Luckey didn’t stop at the capability argument. He went straight to the accountability question. Luckey: “If I’m deploying those landmines in a place where they’re able to make a mistake, and they make a mistake, a person needs to be held accountable. And you say, did you use them appropriately? Did you trade the risks appropriately? Does this actually make sense?” The architecture of the kill chain changes. The liability does not. Autonomous systems don’t absorb responsibility. They accelerate execution. The human who authorized the deployment still owns the outcome. Every outcome. The operators who dominate the modern battlefield will scale autonomous capability aggressively while maintaining absolute human ownership over the decision to deploy it. That is the line. And it never moves. And here’s the part that makes this existential. If you demand a human in the loop for every single physical execution, you are engineering your own vulnerability. Luckey: “The answer is not to say that you cannot have an autonomous air defense system, because if you do that, all someone has to do is they break communications or break your command and control… and now your enemy can pummel you without stopping.” When the command link is jammed, the analog system goes blind. The autonomous system continues to execute. If your infrastructure cannot operate independently the microsecond the network is severed, you are not being cautious. You are being defenseless. Your adversary doesn’t need to destroy the weapon. They just need to cut the wire. The debate was never about whether machines should be trusted with life and death. It was about whether humans can afford the cost of insisting on doing it alone. They can’t.
2:21

Palmer Luckey just dismantled the moral argument against autonomous weapons in three sentences. The choice is not between weapons and no weapons. It is between dumb weapons and smart weapons. And if technology can reduce civilian deaths, refusing to use it is the moral failure. Luckey: “I don’t see the moral high ground in making, for example, an anti-vehicle landmine that can’t tell the difference between a Russian tank and a school bus full of kids.” When you refuse to deploy a system that can distinguish between a combatant and a civilian, you are not protecting humanity. You are choosing collateral damage. Keeping algorithms out of the kill chain doesn’t save lives. It costs them. But Luckey didn’t stop at the capability argument. He went straight to the accountability question. Luckey: “If I’m deploying those landmines in a place where they’re able to make a mistake, and they make a mistake, a person needs to be held accountable. And you say, did you use them appropriately? Did you trade the risks appropriately? Does this actually make sense?” The architecture of the kill chain changes. The liability does not. Autonomous systems don’t absorb responsibility. They accelerate execution. The human who authorized the deployment still owns the outcome. Every outcome. The operators who dominate the modern battlefield will scale autonomous capability aggressively while maintaining absolute human ownership over the decision to deploy it. That is the line. And it never moves. And here’s the part that makes this existential. If you demand a human in the loop for every single physical execution, you are engineering your own vulnerability. Luckey: “The answer is not to say that you cannot have an autonomous air defense system, because if you do that, all someone has to do is they break communications or break your command and control… and now your enemy can pummel you without stopping.” When the command link is jammed, the analog system goes blind. The autonomous system continues to execute. If your infrastructure cannot operate independently the microsecond the network is severed, you are not being cautious. You are being defenseless. Your adversary doesn’t need to destroy the weapon. They just need to cut the wire. The debate was never about whether machines should be trusted with life and death. It was about whether humans can afford the cost of insisting on doing it alone. They can’t.

Dustin

33,061 views • 5 months ago

🇺🇸 The U.S. fired more than 800 Tomahawk missiles in the Iran war, at $2.6 million apiece, and it takes nearly 4 years to replenish a single production run. Here is the full picture: -Nearly half of U.S. Patriot interceptors gone -Between 190-290 THAAD interceptors fired ($15.5 million each) -Up to 80% of long-range ground-launched precision missiles expended And the Pentagon is now scrambling to put the defense industry on wartime footing, with companies that make thermostats and electric bus drives suddenly being asked to manufacture missile components… The replacement timeline is the part nobody is talking about: 4-5 years per weapons system, and that is if everything goes perfectly, which it never does. A CSIS war game simulation found that in a U.S.-China conflict over Taiwan, the U.S. would run out of long-range anti-ship missiles in 3-7 days and air-to-surface missiles within a month. The Heritage Foundation found the same scenario leads to "systemic operational failure" by day 120. The Iran war is not going to deplete the U.S. to the point of losing, nobody is saying that, but it has revealed something that adversaries can see clearly: America burned through years of precision munitions stockpile in 6 weeks against a mid-tier military power. A country that can regenerate combat power quickly is dangerous to fight, a country that visibly cannot is one that invites aggression. China is watching, and they just launched their most extensive military drills around Taiwan in years. Source: CBC News
13:26

🇺🇸 The U.S. fired more than 800 Tomahawk missiles in the Iran war, at $2.6 million apiece, and it takes nearly 4 years to replenish a single production run. Here is the full picture: -Nearly half of U.S. Patriot interceptors gone -Between 190-290 THAAD interceptors fired ($15.5 million each) -Up to 80% of long-range ground-launched precision missiles expended And the Pentagon is now scrambling to put the defense industry on wartime footing, with companies that make thermostats and electric bus drives suddenly being asked to manufacture missile components… The replacement timeline is the part nobody is talking about: 4-5 years per weapons system, and that is if everything goes perfectly, which it never does. A CSIS war game simulation found that in a U.S.-China conflict over Taiwan, the U.S. would run out of long-range anti-ship missiles in 3-7 days and air-to-surface missiles within a month. The Heritage Foundation found the same scenario leads to "systemic operational failure" by day 120. The Iran war is not going to deplete the U.S. to the point of losing, nobody is saying that, but it has revealed something that adversaries can see clearly: America burned through years of precision munitions stockpile in 6 weeks against a mid-tier military power. A country that can regenerate combat power quickly is dangerous to fight, a country that visibly cannot is one that invites aggression. China is watching, and they just launched their most extensive military drills around Taiwan in years. Source: CBC News

Mario Nawfal

25,398 views • 3 months ago

Accountability is a word not found in the Government of India's dictionary under the present BJP leadership… It’s not only about NEET and question leaks but also about numerous issues: electoral bonds, the PM CARES Fund, the tragedy of Demonetisation and the Covid fiasco, including the Covishield vaccine controversy…This is in addition to the general abuse and subversion of institutions, including the basic mechanisms of the legislative oversight function under the parliamentary system. Far from the cosmopolitan gaze, amidst these “national” issues, like the invisible provincial tragedies of the distant colonies of the European empires of yesteryears, Manipur, my home state, has been reeling under an unprecedented tragedy for more than three years. Today, as I witness the tear gas and lathi charges right in the heart of Delhi, I can’t help but think of the blown-off shoulder and pellet-ridden heads of protesting young students as they face tear gas and pellet guns in Imphal during the present crisis in Manipur…And of course, those mutilated and bruised bodies, burnt down villages and residential complexes, life of the internally displaced persons (IDPs) in the wretched condition of the so-called “relief camps”, pathetic conduct and bankruptcy of the political class, and the incompetence and failures of the security establishments, including units of the powerful Indian army, under whose nose, hundreds of people have been killed, thousands of houses burnt down and villages emptied of their inhabitants… There is NO ACCOUNTABILITY for all these criminal acts and negligence. And the PARLIAMENT of the largest democracy doesn’t have time for any discussion on this tragedy…Let alone fixing accountability, to make the tragedy visible itself is a struggle; to recognise it as a tragedy of a “constituent state” of the UNION, if not a “national issue”! Unthinkable, and unconstitutional as it is, people are still not able to move freely in the state or get access to the “national” highways, as they are being denied access, or there is no security for them to get access to these highways because they belong to this or that community (as if Article 15, Article 19 are not for the people of the state). And just as they cannot get access to roads, air travel becomes a necessity. Airlines have been milking these helpless people by hiking prices, and when elected members like me have approached the ministry and other officials, they say these are “private airlines” driven by demand and supply, and hence the Government cannot impose a “fare cap,” etc. And lo! When the Indigo crisis hit the “national mainstream”. The Government of India imposed a “fare cap” to stop the airlines from exploiting the situation by manipulating the fare hike! But one day, hopefully, accountability will be heard, and the reality that postcolonial scholars talk about, namely, the continuity of the colonial in the postcolonial, will also finally come to an end! "Vande Mataram”, "Ima Leipakna Yaiphare"! #cjp_पार्टी #sansadchalo
1:29

Accountability is a word not found in the Government of India's dictionary under the present BJP leadership… It’s not only about NEET and question leaks but also about numerous issues: electoral bonds, the PM CARES Fund, the tragedy of Demonetisation and the Covid fiasco, including the Covishield vaccine controversy…This is in addition to the general abuse and subversion of institutions, including the basic mechanisms of the legislative oversight function under the parliamentary system. Far from the cosmopolitan gaze, amidst these “national” issues, like the invisible provincial tragedies of the distant colonies of the European empires of yesteryears, Manipur, my home state, has been reeling under an unprecedented tragedy for more than three years. Today, as I witness the tear gas and lathi charges right in the heart of Delhi, I can’t help but think of the blown-off shoulder and pellet-ridden heads of protesting young students as they face tear gas and pellet guns in Imphal during the present crisis in Manipur…And of course, those mutilated and bruised bodies, burnt down villages and residential complexes, life of the internally displaced persons (IDPs) in the wretched condition of the so-called “relief camps”, pathetic conduct and bankruptcy of the political class, and the incompetence and failures of the security establishments, including units of the powerful Indian army, under whose nose, hundreds of people have been killed, thousands of houses burnt down and villages emptied of their inhabitants… There is NO ACCOUNTABILITY for all these criminal acts and negligence. And the PARLIAMENT of the largest democracy doesn’t have time for any discussion on this tragedy…Let alone fixing accountability, to make the tragedy visible itself is a struggle; to recognise it as a tragedy of a “constituent state” of the UNION, if not a “national issue”! Unthinkable, and unconstitutional as it is, people are still not able to move freely in the state or get access to the “national” highways, as they are being denied access, or there is no security for them to get access to these highways because they belong to this or that community (as if Article 15, Article 19 are not for the people of the state). And just as they cannot get access to roads, air travel becomes a necessity. Airlines have been milking these helpless people by hiking prices, and when elected members like me have approached the ministry and other officials, they say these are “private airlines” driven by demand and supply, and hence the Government cannot impose a “fare cap,” etc. And lo! When the Indigo crisis hit the “national mainstream”. The Government of India imposed a “fare cap” to stop the airlines from exploiting the situation by manipulating the fare hike! But one day, hopefully, accountability will be heard, and the reality that postcolonial scholars talk about, namely, the continuity of the colonial in the postcolonial, will also finally come to an end! "Vande Mataram”, "Ima Leipakna Yaiphare"! #cjp_पार्टी #sansadchalo

A. Bimol Akoijam

41,814 views • 1 month ago

“The No. 1 Thing I’ve Learned During the Right-Wing Civil War” The loudest voices on the Right —Tucker Carlson most prominently—wouldn’t last one day as openly Jewish Americans. When Tucker gets criticized for terrible takes, he doesn’t defend them; he cries censorship. But Tucker, no one’s silencing you! You’re being criticized because your takes are garbage: anti-American, anti-capitalist, and embarrassingly weak-minded. You hide behind a fake shield of “free speech” while trying to silence others. That’s not censorship. That’s cowardice. And it’s not your skin color or religion we reject; it’s your words and actions. The things YOU control. There’s this myth that Jews are weak, especially in America. But you? You’re weaker than our weakest. Because strength isn’t about avoiding criticism; it’s about facing it head-on. You want to play victim? Try being a Jew on camera in this country for a week. Look at Dave Portnoy (Dave Portnoy). Not exactly a Chabad Jew, but when some clown shouted “F*** the Jews” during a Pizza Review, Portnoy didn’t fold. He stood there, let the camera roll, and is about to make that bigot famous. That’s strength. That’s what the ADL doesn’t understand with their “Stop the Hate” campaigns. You don’t stop hate by banning it; you stop it by confronting it and destroying it. That’s what America did in 1945, and during the Cold War. (A reminder, Tucker: Russia were the baddies.) That’s what we’re doing now with you! Confronting weakness disguised as patriotism. When Ben Shapiro plays your own clips back to you, that’s not censorship; it’s accountability. We’re holding you to your own words, and you hate that. Because the truth is, you sound like a weaker version of Jonathan Greenblatt; whining about criticism while trying to muzzle it. So here’s my advice: grow a pair, and grow a perspective. Or go elsewhere. Because you’re going to lose this war. America is still the greatest country on earth, and we’re not letting frauds like you ruin it with your excuses and sympathy for tyrants. You’re being criticized not because of who you are, but because of what you’ve become: a liar for hostile regimes, a mouthpiece for moral rot, a man allergic to criticism. You talk about strength, but every time someone calls you out, you crumble. You project, you deflect, you play the victim. Doing anything to hide that you’ve betrayed the very values you claim to defend. You think Jews are the problem? No, Tucker. The problem is men who pretend to love America while trying to silence the people who actually do.
3:00

“The No. 1 Thing I’ve Learned During the Right-Wing Civil War” The loudest voices on the Right —Tucker Carlson most prominently—wouldn’t last one day as openly Jewish Americans. When Tucker gets criticized for terrible takes, he doesn’t defend them; he cries censorship. But Tucker, no one’s silencing you! You’re being criticized because your takes are garbage: anti-American, anti-capitalist, and embarrassingly weak-minded. You hide behind a fake shield of “free speech” while trying to silence others. That’s not censorship. That’s cowardice. And it’s not your skin color or religion we reject; it’s your words and actions. The things YOU control. There’s this myth that Jews are weak, especially in America. But you? You’re weaker than our weakest. Because strength isn’t about avoiding criticism; it’s about facing it head-on. You want to play victim? Try being a Jew on camera in this country for a week. Look at Dave Portnoy (Dave Portnoy). Not exactly a Chabad Jew, but when some clown shouted “F*** the Jews” during a Pizza Review, Portnoy didn’t fold. He stood there, let the camera roll, and is about to make that bigot famous. That’s strength. That’s what the ADL doesn’t understand with their “Stop the Hate” campaigns. You don’t stop hate by banning it; you stop it by confronting it and destroying it. That’s what America did in 1945, and during the Cold War. (A reminder, Tucker: Russia were the baddies.) That’s what we’re doing now with you! Confronting weakness disguised as patriotism. When Ben Shapiro plays your own clips back to you, that’s not censorship; it’s accountability. We’re holding you to your own words, and you hate that. Because the truth is, you sound like a weaker version of Jonathan Greenblatt; whining about criticism while trying to muzzle it. So here’s my advice: grow a pair, and grow a perspective. Or go elsewhere. Because you’re going to lose this war. America is still the greatest country on earth, and we’re not letting frauds like you ruin it with your excuses and sympathy for tyrants. You’re being criticized not because of who you are, but because of what you’ve become: a liar for hostile regimes, a mouthpiece for moral rot, a man allergic to criticism. You talk about strength, but every time someone calls you out, you crumble. You project, you deflect, you play the victim. Doing anything to hide that you’ve betrayed the very values you claim to defend. You think Jews are the problem? No, Tucker. The problem is men who pretend to love America while trying to silence the people who actually do.

Jake Donnelly

42,298 views • 9 months ago

Humphrey’s Executor has been Slaughtered! Over the last 15 years, the Court has steadily chipped away at that 90-year-old case that blessed for-cause removal protections for the heads of so-called “independent” agencies. Trump v. Slaughter is the logical culmination of that line—a ruling that lets the president remove those officials because, after all, the Constitution vests all executive power in the president, including being able to decide who exercises power in his name. This decision isn’t a gift to President Trump or those who succeed him, but a restoration of constitutional order. Congress can create executive-branch agencies and specify their authority, but it can’t create new branches of government unanswerable to anyone. Putting the FTC and other alphabet agencies back under presidential control doesn’t make the chief executive omnipotent; it makes the bureaucrats answerable to someone who’s answerable to the voters. At base, Trump v. Slaughter asks whether the people we elect to govern us get to do so—or whether appointed commissioners and their staffers can run the country on autopilot. In a republic, the buck should stop with the president, not assorted boards of “independent” mandarins. The Federal Reserve is an exception, however, because it’s never been considered an executive-branch agency and concerns about political interference in monetary policy go back to the Founding. Justice Alito, joined by Justice Gorsuch, is thus correct in his dissent in Trump v. Cook, that this “emergency” application for stay should’ve been granted or denied back in the fall, but instead we have an unsatisfying resolution that doesn’t resolve much and just sends the factual determination of whether Lisa Cook was properly fired “for cause” back where it should’ve been all along, in the district court. This all would’ve been resolved much sooner has the Supreme Court not insisted on full briefing, argument, and months of deliberation on what is correctly now known as the “interim-relief docket.”
0:48

Humphrey’s Executor has been Slaughtered! Over the last 15 years, the Court has steadily chipped away at that 90-year-old case that blessed for-cause removal protections for the heads of so-called “independent” agencies. Trump v. Slaughter is the logical culmination of that line—a ruling that lets the president remove those officials because, after all, the Constitution vests all executive power in the president, including being able to decide who exercises power in his name. This decision isn’t a gift to President Trump or those who succeed him, but a restoration of constitutional order. Congress can create executive-branch agencies and specify their authority, but it can’t create new branches of government unanswerable to anyone. Putting the FTC and other alphabet agencies back under presidential control doesn’t make the chief executive omnipotent; it makes the bureaucrats answerable to someone who’s answerable to the voters. At base, Trump v. Slaughter asks whether the people we elect to govern us get to do so—or whether appointed commissioners and their staffers can run the country on autopilot. In a republic, the buck should stop with the president, not assorted boards of “independent” mandarins. The Federal Reserve is an exception, however, because it’s never been considered an executive-branch agency and concerns about political interference in monetary policy go back to the Founding. Justice Alito, joined by Justice Gorsuch, is thus correct in his dissent in Trump v. Cook, that this “emergency” application for stay should’ve been granted or denied back in the fall, but instead we have an unsatisfying resolution that doesn’t resolve much and just sends the factual determination of whether Lisa Cook was properly fired “for cause” back where it should’ve been all along, in the district court. This all would’ve been resolved much sooner has the Supreme Court not insisted on full briefing, argument, and months of deliberation on what is correctly now known as the “interim-relief docket.”

Ilya Shapiro

27,570 views • 1 month ago

Remember when Meghan Markle said that on the “freedom flight” a crew member knelt next to her seat, took his hat off and told her, “We appreciate everything you did for our country.” 🤭 She later said it was the “first time” someone had recognised the “sacrifice” she had made 👀 I’m sorry but what sacrifice exactly? Apart from taxpayers ending up with a wedding estimated around £32 million that she later called a “spectacle”, I’m struggling to remember the contribution we’re all supposed to be grateful for 🙄 Meghan Markle always seems to have something extraordinary happening during flights, doesn’t she? It’s like all her biggest admirers are permanently somewhere in the skies 😌 And now we have not one but TWO Richie Richs signing her anniversary message… what are the odds 😂 But then it’s Meghan Markle’s world and stranger things have happened, so two crew members with the same name on one plane? Who knows 🤯 Maybe next we’ll hear about a crew member thanking her for her bravery in surviving hardships no ordinary person could possibly comprehend 😌 Or a pilot interrupting the flight to say, “Ladies and gentlemen, before landing we’d like to personally thank Meghan Markle for her extraordinary sacrifices and everything she has done for humanity.” 🤭 Or a cabin crew member wiping away tears whispering, “No one has ever suffered or sacrificed quite like you.” 😭 At this point, with Meghan Markle flight stories, I’m just wondering how long before we hear the next one 👀😭 On a serious note though, I’m embarrassed just listening to some of these stories 😭 The dramatic sobbing into a security guard’s arms… girl where was your husband that you had to collapse into the The “I tried so hard”, the kneeling crew member, the endless admiration, the extraordinary sacrifices… how do people listen to all this and not think, “this sounds less like real life and more like a Wattpad story where the heroine is worshipped by everyone she meets” 😭 Because the level of self importance in some of these stories is genuinely astonishing… and what surprises me even more is there are people listening thinking, “yes, this all sounds perfectly normal” 👀
1:04

Remember when Meghan Markle said that on the “freedom flight” a crew member knelt next to her seat, took his hat off and told her, “We appreciate everything you did for our country.” 🤭 She later said it was the “first time” someone had recognised the “sacrifice” she had made 👀 I’m sorry but what sacrifice exactly? Apart from taxpayers ending up with a wedding estimated around £32 million that she later called a “spectacle”, I’m struggling to remember the contribution we’re all supposed to be grateful for 🙄 Meghan Markle always seems to have something extraordinary happening during flights, doesn’t she? It’s like all her biggest admirers are permanently somewhere in the skies 😌 And now we have not one but TWO Richie Richs signing her anniversary message… what are the odds 😂 But then it’s Meghan Markle’s world and stranger things have happened, so two crew members with the same name on one plane? Who knows 🤯 Maybe next we’ll hear about a crew member thanking her for her bravery in surviving hardships no ordinary person could possibly comprehend 😌 Or a pilot interrupting the flight to say, “Ladies and gentlemen, before landing we’d like to personally thank Meghan Markle for her extraordinary sacrifices and everything she has done for humanity.” 🤭 Or a cabin crew member wiping away tears whispering, “No one has ever suffered or sacrificed quite like you.” 😭 At this point, with Meghan Markle flight stories, I’m just wondering how long before we hear the next one 👀😭 On a serious note though, I’m embarrassed just listening to some of these stories 😭 The dramatic sobbing into a security guard’s arms… girl where was your husband that you had to collapse into the The “I tried so hard”, the kneeling crew member, the endless admiration, the extraordinary sacrifices… how do people listen to all this and not think, “this sounds less like real life and more like a Wattpad story where the heroine is worshipped by everyone she meets” 😭 Because the level of self importance in some of these stories is genuinely astonishing… and what surprises me even more is there are people listening thinking, “yes, this all sounds perfectly normal” 👀

Queen Esther

197,299 views • 2 months ago

As I have been warning for the last 5 years, Muslims have to evolve or keep isolating themselves further. The desecration of the Quran and Muhammad is only going to become more frequent. After the last episode of Quran desecration, Iraq and Iran expelled Sweden's ambassador. Muslims celebrated it, but yesterday someone burned the Quran in Denmark. Are you going to expel the Danish ambassadors too? Okay, Sweden and Denmark are smaller countries, and you might be able to do it, but what are you going to do when someone does this in the US, the UK, or Canada? Muslims believe they are still living in the 7th century whereby to satisfy their local audiences, using their religious exhibitionism and bravado, they will be able to coerce and strong-arm other countries into making decisions they don't want to make. This is all but a farce. At this moment, blasphemous cartoons are being made every day, such as the Atheist Republic's blasphemous art, which is viewed by far more people than someone burning a Quran in front of an Iraqi embassy. The only reason people react is that clerics use it for their political purposes. Typically, the TLP in Pakistan engages in organising violent demonstrations whenever a blasphemous event takes place in a distant foreign country to blackmail the government in power. However, we haven't heard a peep from them this time round because they are okay with the current government. These guys have armies of brain-dead zombies to exploit and use them. Muslims need to learn that they will not be able to blackmail the West into burning the Quran or making Muhammad's cartoons. Therefore, instead of creating drama, educate your people. Tell them to ignore these events. Had they not reacted like spoiled little children, Salwan Momika would not have burned the Quran just 2 weeks after the first Quran burning. Seeing how easy it is to provoke Muslims and make them sever diplomatic ties with your countries, a far-right group reenacted a copycat event, probably hoping that those Muslim countries will sever their ties with Denmark too. That's one way to stop immigrants coming from Muslim countries. This will set a dangerous precedent and encourage every far-right activist to burn the Quran to sever their ties with Muslim countries. But we CANNOT TAKE away the desecration of religious symbols as Freedom of Speech and expression are the only things that set the civilized world apart from, dare I say, the uncivilized world. #Denmark #quranburning #DenmarkQuranBurning
0:56

As I have been warning for the last 5 years, Muslims have to evolve or keep isolating themselves further. The desecration of the Quran and Muhammad is only going to become more frequent. After the last episode of Quran desecration, Iraq and Iran expelled Sweden's ambassador. Muslims celebrated it, but yesterday someone burned the Quran in Denmark. Are you going to expel the Danish ambassadors too? Okay, Sweden and Denmark are smaller countries, and you might be able to do it, but what are you going to do when someone does this in the US, the UK, or Canada? Muslims believe they are still living in the 7th century whereby to satisfy their local audiences, using their religious exhibitionism and bravado, they will be able to coerce and strong-arm other countries into making decisions they don't want to make. This is all but a farce. At this moment, blasphemous cartoons are being made every day, such as the Atheist Republic's blasphemous art, which is viewed by far more people than someone burning a Quran in front of an Iraqi embassy. The only reason people react is that clerics use it for their political purposes. Typically, the TLP in Pakistan engages in organising violent demonstrations whenever a blasphemous event takes place in a distant foreign country to blackmail the government in power. However, we haven't heard a peep from them this time round because they are okay with the current government. These guys have armies of brain-dead zombies to exploit and use them. Muslims need to learn that they will not be able to blackmail the West into burning the Quran or making Muhammad's cartoons. Therefore, instead of creating drama, educate your people. Tell them to ignore these events. Had they not reacted like spoiled little children, Salwan Momika would not have burned the Quran just 2 weeks after the first Quran burning. Seeing how easy it is to provoke Muslims and make them sever diplomatic ties with your countries, a far-right group reenacted a copycat event, probably hoping that those Muslim countries will sever their ties with Denmark too. That's one way to stop immigrants coming from Muslim countries. This will set a dangerous precedent and encourage every far-right activist to burn the Quran to sever their ties with Muslim countries. But we CANNOT TAKE away the desecration of religious symbols as Freedom of Speech and expression are the only things that set the civilized world apart from, dare I say, the uncivilized world. #Denmark #quranburning #DenmarkQuranBurning

Harris Sultan

149,973 views • 3 years ago

$365K profit while the programmer slept. This bot found a hole in volatility and turned it into a personal ATM. Let's be honest. If you're trying to trade on Polymarket based on news or intuition you're not a trader. You're food. I analyzed the distinct-baguette wallet. No genius analytics. No White House insiders. Just cold code exploiting a 3-cent error in the order book. How does he make money out of thin air? His profile: At the core of the algorithm lies a simple mathematical glitch called Arbitrage Loop. In a perfect world the price of YES and NO shares always adds up to $1.00. But when chaos hits the market during matches or BTC news liquidity breaks. The bot finds the moment when YES costs 48 cents and NO costs 49 cents. Entry sum: 97 cents. The script instantly buys both sides. It doesn't care who wins. It just waits for expiration and is guaranteed to get $1.00. Result: 3 cents of pure risk-free profit per dollar. Repeat this 15000 times a month and you get his balance. Math vs Human A human is physically incapable of replicating this. Your reaction from eye to brain to click: 0.4 seconds. Python script reaction: 0.005 seconds. By the time you see the price on screen it's already gone. You're looking at ghosts. Trying to outrun this bot manually is like trying to stop a train with your palm. You're simply paying his bills with your slippage. How to stop being liquidity? In 2026 you either write code or you're feed. But there's a third option. You don't need to learn C++ or rent a server in the same rack as the exchange. You just need the right entry. I found a gateway that allows copying the logic of such wallets. You stop playing guessing games and connect to the smart money flow. When the algorithm finds a hole in the price you enter alongside it. Automatically. Stop trading against machines. Stand on their side: While you were reading this text the glitch happened three more times. Someone took that money. Why not you?
0:24

$365K profit while the programmer slept. This bot found a hole in volatility and turned it into a personal ATM. Let's be honest. If you're trying to trade on Polymarket based on news or intuition you're not a trader. You're food. I analyzed the distinct-baguette wallet. No genius analytics. No White House insiders. Just cold code exploiting a 3-cent error in the order book. How does he make money out of thin air? His profile: At the core of the algorithm lies a simple mathematical glitch called Arbitrage Loop. In a perfect world the price of YES and NO shares always adds up to $1.00. But when chaos hits the market during matches or BTC news liquidity breaks. The bot finds the moment when YES costs 48 cents and NO costs 49 cents. Entry sum: 97 cents. The script instantly buys both sides. It doesn't care who wins. It just waits for expiration and is guaranteed to get $1.00. Result: 3 cents of pure risk-free profit per dollar. Repeat this 15000 times a month and you get his balance. Math vs Human A human is physically incapable of replicating this. Your reaction from eye to brain to click: 0.4 seconds. Python script reaction: 0.005 seconds. By the time you see the price on screen it's already gone. You're looking at ghosts. Trying to outrun this bot manually is like trying to stop a train with your palm. You're simply paying his bills with your slippage. How to stop being liquidity? In 2026 you either write code or you're feed. But there's a third option. You don't need to learn C++ or rent a server in the same rack as the exchange. You just need the right entry. I found a gateway that allows copying the logic of such wallets. You stop playing guessing games and connect to the smart money flow. When the algorithm finds a hole in the price you enter alongside it. Automatically. Stop trading against machines. Stand on their side: While you were reading this text the glitch happened three more times. Someone took that money. Why not you?

Blaze

16,039 views • 7 months ago

The main issue with crypto (generally anything with extremely asymmetric payoffs, pro sports, youtubing/vlogging, venture capital, etc) is that its almost always heavily frontloaded effort. This is in stark contrast compared to what "regular" people do (I can't even say normies, that's literally a normie word now) - do work, get paid, rinse and repeat. The mind of someone trapped (vid related) in that lifestyle cannot comprehend that there's an entirely different lifestyle possible. And even if they could comprehend it, they have prior commitments - bank debt, family that needs taking care of whether very old or very young, and do not have time to get into something new. Why don't they just quit? Because they cannot service pre-existing commitments and if they were to suddenly drop all work that pays them once or twice a month they would not make it past 3 months. It's also why they fall for gurus/courses on instagram/tiktok, the death grip of a person giving a dream of escaping the cage "one last shot". Once they fail and become resigned to their fate, they resent anyone who's their mutual friend from before that managed to escape. It's the ultimate Catch22 of our time and the reconciliation of these two sides is almost near impossible. The eternal wagie takes offense to you telling him to grind hard and sleep less because he's too deep down the other side of the spectrum - do this for long enough and the feeling of having to turn up for work every day becomes almost like a parasite that you cannot get rid of. It's not a matter of showing up and doing the steps that are needed - it's a matter of mindset, and we all know how hard it can be to change our minds on things as we grow older. It doesn't matter how hard you try to get the wageworm out of your body, a part of it will always linger and stay in you, regenerating and multiplying, with each season passing, and until its reached the saturation point of "good enough" where your dreams and hopes are not crushed by other people but by yourself. I count and bless every single dollar that has ever reached my wallets and bank accounts when I see a video like this, because I know way too many people who are doomed to a lifestyle that should not be called worthy of a human.
1:24

The main issue with crypto (generally anything with extremely asymmetric payoffs, pro sports, youtubing/vlogging, venture capital, etc) is that its almost always heavily frontloaded effort. This is in stark contrast compared to what "regular" people do (I can't even say normies, that's literally a normie word now) - do work, get paid, rinse and repeat. The mind of someone trapped (vid related) in that lifestyle cannot comprehend that there's an entirely different lifestyle possible. And even if they could comprehend it, they have prior commitments - bank debt, family that needs taking care of whether very old or very young, and do not have time to get into something new. Why don't they just quit? Because they cannot service pre-existing commitments and if they were to suddenly drop all work that pays them once or twice a month they would not make it past 3 months. It's also why they fall for gurus/courses on instagram/tiktok, the death grip of a person giving a dream of escaping the cage "one last shot". Once they fail and become resigned to their fate, they resent anyone who's their mutual friend from before that managed to escape. It's the ultimate Catch22 of our time and the reconciliation of these two sides is almost near impossible. The eternal wagie takes offense to you telling him to grind hard and sleep less because he's too deep down the other side of the spectrum - do this for long enough and the feeling of having to turn up for work every day becomes almost like a parasite that you cannot get rid of. It's not a matter of showing up and doing the steps that are needed - it's a matter of mindset, and we all know how hard it can be to change our minds on things as we grow older. It doesn't matter how hard you try to get the wageworm out of your body, a part of it will always linger and stay in you, regenerating and multiplying, with each season passing, and until its reached the saturation point of "good enough" where your dreams and hopes are not crushed by other people but by yourself. I count and bless every single dollar that has ever reached my wallets and bank accounts when I see a video like this, because I know way too many people who are doomed to a lifestyle that should not be called worthy of a human.

katexbt.hl

56,549 views • 10 months ago

Alex Krainer (Alex (Sasha) Krainer) identifies the single remaining mechanism that still holds the Western empire together. While debts explode and European banks sit on even thinner ice than American ones, the only glue left is the petrodollar. Russia and China understand this. Iran is now in a position to strike it directly. “The only way this whole empire is being held together, the only glue that holds it together is in fact the petrodollar. And I think that this is very obvious to the Russians and to the Chinese. And so I think that destroying the petrodollar has to be an important objective in the resistance against the empire. Now, I don’t think that the Russians or the Chinese are inclined to make very aggressive moves to deliberately crash the petrodollar because they don’t have to. It’s going to implode anyway. It’s important to understand for our viewers that most of the US dollars in circulation today, an estimated 60%, circulate outside of the United States. So it’s not just a US American financial problem; it’s the whole world. And so many countries hold their reserve assets in US dollars. Many countries have their pension funds invested in US dollar assets. So a collapse of the petrodollar and the US dollar could end up being the same event. I don’t know that the Trump administration is going to manage to insulate their domestic dollar against the dollar circulating outside of the United States. And there’s something between 20 and 30 trillion dollars of US-denominated assets owned by foreigners. And so destabilizing the dollar deliberately would risk consequences that would be detrimental to many nations around the world. It will exacerbate food price inflation, which would be very devastating to many ‘Global South’ countries. So it’s important to build alternatives to give countries time to prepare for the adjustment and to let the dollar unravel under its own momentum. But Iran has a different incentive in this whole thing. And I think the Iranians are now perfectly in position to strike at the petrodollar by conditioning passage through the Strait of Hormuz: the ship can pass if the cargo was paid in Chinese yuan or Russian rubles or Indian rupee or whatever it be and not in US dollars. So that’s already exacerbating the pressure on the US dollar, and the Chinese and the Russians don’t have to take any aggressive active measures against that.” The petrodollar is the last structural support. Once it goes, the rest of the system follows.
3:18

Alex Krainer (Alex (Sasha) Krainer) identifies the single remaining mechanism that still holds the Western empire together. While debts explode and European banks sit on even thinner ice than American ones, the only glue left is the petrodollar. Russia and China understand this. Iran is now in a position to strike it directly. “The only way this whole empire is being held together, the only glue that holds it together is in fact the petrodollar. And I think that this is very obvious to the Russians and to the Chinese. And so I think that destroying the petrodollar has to be an important objective in the resistance against the empire. Now, I don’t think that the Russians or the Chinese are inclined to make very aggressive moves to deliberately crash the petrodollar because they don’t have to. It’s going to implode anyway. It’s important to understand for our viewers that most of the US dollars in circulation today, an estimated 60%, circulate outside of the United States. So it’s not just a US American financial problem; it’s the whole world. And so many countries hold their reserve assets in US dollars. Many countries have their pension funds invested in US dollar assets. So a collapse of the petrodollar and the US dollar could end up being the same event. I don’t know that the Trump administration is going to manage to insulate their domestic dollar against the dollar circulating outside of the United States. And there’s something between 20 and 30 trillion dollars of US-denominated assets owned by foreigners. And so destabilizing the dollar deliberately would risk consequences that would be detrimental to many nations around the world. It will exacerbate food price inflation, which would be very devastating to many ‘Global South’ countries. So it’s important to build alternatives to give countries time to prepare for the adjustment and to let the dollar unravel under its own momentum. But Iran has a different incentive in this whole thing. And I think the Iranians are now perfectly in position to strike at the petrodollar by conditioning passage through the Strait of Hormuz: the ship can pass if the cargo was paid in Chinese yuan or Russian rubles or Indian rupee or whatever it be and not in US dollars. So that’s already exacerbating the pressure on the US dollar, and the Chinese and the Russians don’t have to take any aggressive active measures against that.” The petrodollar is the last structural support. Once it goes, the rest of the system follows.

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

18,360 views • 6 days ago