Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

The Expropriation Act DOES allow property confiscation, despite what some claim. FMF Head of Policy Martin van Staden explains how this threatens property rights, economic stability, and South Africa’s preferential trade ties, including AGOA. Read our press release here:

39,683 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von BrianGriffin
BrianGriffinvor 1 Jahr

@Martin_ASFL All property. Not just land 👇🏻

Profilbild von ANDILE BRUCE DUMEZWENI
ANDILE BRUCE DUMEZWENIvor 1 Jahr

@Martin_ASFL One of those white racists foundations... blah! blah! Blah! Go back and read the act, find someone to help you analyze it.

Profilbild von shins
shinsvor 1 Jahr

@Martin_ASFL NOT without compensation and not at a whim from government....

Profilbild von Johan Chistiaan
Johan Chistiaanvor 1 Jahr

The expropriation bill will not stop with only land. It is a very vague interpretation when it comes to implementing it into law. These 30 percenters will try and use vague interpretations to take what they want. They will get clever white legal minds to help them do this by paying them a shit load of money.

Profilbild von Cobus
Cobusvor 1 Jahr

@Martin_ASFL @PieterDuToit @pietcroucamp @AdriaanBasson @StephenGrootes julle moet luister. Dalk leer jul iets.

Profilbild von Fiela se kleinkind😊
Fiela se kleinkind😊vor 1 Jahr

@Martin_ASFL So you telling me, that now lawyer interpreted the Act on their behalf? Everyone is just going off on miscommunication?

Profilbild von Banach spaces
Banach spacesvor 1 Jahr

@Martin_ASFL We not apposing it.

Profilbild von Elite Trader Funding
Elite Trader Fundingvor 1 Jahr

Tired of prop firms that don't give a F*** about you? Unlike others... at ETF, we don't put our bottom line before our traders.

Profilbild von Antonio
Antoniovor 1 Jahr

@Martin_ASFL South Korea implemented land reform using the same policies, and now they are one of the richest countries in the world. You are wrong with your assessment. @54Battalion @MzwaneleManyi

Profilbild von Peter Hamilton
Peter Hamiltonvor 1 Jahr

@Martin_ASFL Why is everyone only focusing on property, what about some views on farmers, employment and tender rules etc?

Profilbild von cry
cryvor 1 Jahr

@Martin_ASFL Yes it’s going to happen to those that did occupy the land correctly… for example is the owner paid market value for the land, Like Sun City … and was the land paid for, like Orania.. and it also stops future illegal land occupation, like Cape independence… we know🤭

Ähnliche Videos

Diplomatic crisis with the US is in no one’s interest: The civil rights organisation AfriForum says the current diplomatic crisis with the US is not in anyone’s interest in South Africa and could have been prevented if the ANC leadership had not ignored AfriForum and the Solidarity Movement’s efforts to help find solutions. AfriForum emphasises that, as an organisation, it remains committed to helping find solutions to this crisis in the best interest of everyone in the country. According to Kallie Kriel, CEO of AfriForum, ANC leaders have so far actively prevented attempts to find solutions by, among other things, inviting the Iranian ambassador to the ANC headquarters and making anti-American statements. “Ronald Lamola, Minister of International Relations and Cooperation, acted directly against South Africa’s interests by publicly accusing President Donald Trump of having a ‘white supremacy’ agenda, despite his role as minister to promote international relations. Lamola disregarded the possibility of retaliation for his statements, and now we are all reaping the bitter fruits of that,” says Kriel. Referring to Trump’s latest statements on social media about farm murders and property rights, Kriel says that concrete steps must be taken to combat farm murders and protect property rights, as this is the best way to tackle these issues. According to Kriel, AfriForum has therefore already made several proposals to the ANC’s leaders to serve as solutions in this regard. AfriForum proposes, among other things, the following solutions for combating farm murders and protecting property rights: Farm Murders • President Ramaphosa should be urged to unconditionally condemn the “Kill the Boer” chant, which is a call for ethnic violence against Afrikaners. • The South African government should at least acknowledge the fact that farm murders are accompanied by excessive torture and violence. • Farm murders should be declared a priority crime, as is already the case with numerous other crimes, including rhino poaching. • The government should decide that the South African Police Service (SAPS) should officially and in a planned manner collaborate with farm and neighbourhood watches nationwide that operate within the framework of the law. Expropriation Act • The South African government must commit itself to protecting property rights. • Section 12(3) of the Expropriation Act, which allows for expropriation without compensation, must be revoked. • Section 19(2) of the Expropriation Act, which allows for expropriation to take place before a court decision is reached, must be amended.

Kallie Kriel

28,047 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

USA boycotts G20 AfriForum warned the ANC in advance that South Africa’s relationship with the USA cannot be repaired by falsely dismissing American concerns as the result of “misinformation.” The reckless strategy of the ANC-led government has now failed, and the country is reaping the bitter fruits thereof. It is in the country’s best interest to restore relations with the USA. AfriForum proposes that this be done by finding solutions to, among other things, the farm murder crisis and the lack of respect for property rights — issues that have once again been highlighted by President Donald J. Trump. AfriForum proposes the following: Farm murders •The Presidency 🇿🇦 Cyril Ramaphosa 🇿🇦 must unconditionally condemn the “kill the Boer” chant, which calls for ethnic violence against Afrikaners. •Acknowledgement must be given that farm murders are often accompanied by excessive torture and violence. •Farm murders must be declared a priority crime, as is already the case with many other crimes — even rhino poaching is a priority crime. •The government must ensure that the police cooperate with farm and neighborhood watch groups that operate within the framework of the law. Expropriation Act •The government must commit itself to protecting property rights. •Section 12(3) of the Expropriation Act, which makes expropriation without compensation possible, must be repealed. •Section 19(2) of the Expropriation Act, which allows expropriation to take place before the courts have given a final ruling, must be amended.

Kallie Kriel

239,468 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

David Friedberg: The Socialists Are Coming for Your Private Property Rights At a recent hearing held by NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani, a speaker equated evictions with violence. david friedberg says this demonization of landlords and the good/evil moralistic framing are signals that socialists are trying to erode private property rights in America. “In 1787, John Quincy Adams had a comment, ‘The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence.’ Private property rights are the foundations of liberty in America. Because if you think about where everyone that came to America was coming from, there were these tyrannical governments where some overlord or some cabal could decide at any point to take the things that you have. You had no private property rights as an individual. And it was that stasis that drove so many to come to the United States and say, ‘We want a place where individuals, one person, can say, I own something, and no one can take it from me.’ This idea that you can then claim acts of violence, that you can then claim circumstances of extraordinary extravagant wealth, and say to that individual, ‘I now have a right, the government now has a right to take your private property,’ ultimately leads to this tyrannical form. And it starts out as being anarchic, and remember, anarchy is a temporary state. It's always in between one state and another. All anarchies end up in tyranny, so anarchy and tyranny are one in the same. And fundamentally, what's going on with these socialist principles is that, ‘We are taking your private property, and you no longer have rights on your private property. We now will have the right to come in and take your property and control it and take it from you.’ And it always starts with this framing of moralistic intent. ‘We are good, you are bad for the following reasons. You have committed violence against the people that live in your building.’ So the first framing is that the private property owner is evil, and that the private property owner has committed an act of injustice against those who don't have the private property. And that is the justification for taking away their private property rights. And it is the beginning of this transition towards a tyrannical system, which will ultimately be what I call this kind of Great American Politburo or whatever socialist framework gets set up by the cabal of the socialists and what they're trying to put together. So all of these little acts, while seeming ridiculous, and insane, and inappropriate, in aggregate are the same thing: They're a transition away from private property rights, which is the foundation of the United States of America. That's why I think we should all be so shocked. And to John Quincy Adams' point, we need to vehemently defend those rights. As soon as those rights start to slip away, even in the tiniest way, it is a cascading effect, and everything will become tyrannical, and it will be very ugly in the United States of America.”

The All-In Podcast

179,801 Aufrufe • vor 21 Tagen

📖 Article: South Africa's Expropriation Act — what it actually says, and why Trump & Musk are misleading you. Let's break it down. South Africa's Expropriation Act (signed Jan 23, 2025) is a land reform law that allows the government to acquire property for PUBLIC purposes — like building schools, hospitals, and infrastructure. It REPLACES a 1975 apartheid-era law. The most controversial part? "Nil compensation" in SPECIFIC circumstances: abandoned land, unused speculative land, land posing health risks, or land worth less than government investment in it. That's it. It is NOT a blanket seizure policy. The law also requires government to FIRST negotiate with landowners before any expropriation. Owners retain full rights to challenge decisions in court. This is standard in most democracies — the US has eminent domain laws that do the same thing. Now here's what Trump claimed: that the law enables the government to "seize ethnic minority Afrikaners' agricultural property without compensation." That is FALSE. The law applies to ALL property owners regardless of race. As of today, NOT A SINGLE piece of land has been seized without compensation under this law. Not one. The South African government confirmed this. CNN fact-checkers confirmed this. Multiple experts confirmed this. Trump also claimed there is a "genocide" against white farmers. He even played a video of white crosses at the White House during a meeting with President Ramaphosa — claiming each cross was a murdered farmer. That was ALSO misleading. Those crosses were from a 2020 memorial service for a murdered couple — NOT evidence of mass killings. Crime in South Africa affects ALL communities. There is no statistical evidence of racially targeted killings of white farmers constituting genocide. Now Elon Musk. He's been amplifying "white genocide" narratives on X and calling South Africa's Black Economic Empowerment laws "Apartheid 2.0." Why? Because Starlink can't get a licence there — a rule that applies to ALL foreign telecoms companies equally. Musk claimed Starlink is blocked "because I'm not Black." That's misleading. South African law requires 30% local Black ownership for telecoms companies — a post-apartheid policy to correct decades of economic exclusion that affected the Black majority. The South African government has called Musk's claims "lies and disinformation." Spokesperson Vincent Magwenya said his rhetoric is "harmful to the country's international reputation" and undermines any genuine engagement. Context matters: White South Africans make up 7% of the population but own ~70% of commercial farmland — a direct legacy of apartheid. The Expropriation Act is an attempt to address that imbalance WITHIN constitutional limits. So why are Trump & Musk doing this? Trump has political incentives to play to his base with a "white persecution" narrative. Musk has a direct financial grievance with SA over Starlink. Neither is giving you the full picture.

LambChip

14,680 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten