Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

The Farm Bill working its way through Congress would have shielded all pesticides from liability for causing cancer and other serious harms. Dr. Alexandra Muñoz

AaronSiriSG's profile picture

Aaron Siri

281,866 subscribers

10,530 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Toxicologist discusses glyphosate, the harms it causes, how pesticide companies seek to shield themselves from liability for those harms, and the recent Congress Farm Bill amendment victory. (00:00) Dr. Alexandra Munoz Intro (02:36) The Science Behind Glyphosate’s Carcinogenicity (09:01) Scientific Consensus on Glyphosate's Dangers (15:06) Mechanisms of DNA Damage and Cancer Development (24:06) The Role of Glyphosate in Cancer Risk (43:28) The Silencing of Scientist From Speaking Out (47:28) The Organic Food Debate (49:20) Legislative Challenges and Pesticide Liability (52:12) EPA Labels and Legal Immunity (58:27) Threat to the Fertility of an Entire Generation (1:11:18) A National Security Issue (1:19:27) The Farm Bill Victory (1:21:13) Hope in Activism Dr. Alexandra Muñoz
1:30:45

Toxicologist discusses glyphosate, the harms it causes, how pesticide companies seek to shield themselves from liability for those harms, and the recent Congress Farm Bill amendment victory. (00:00) Dr. Alexandra Munoz Intro (02:36) The Science Behind Glyphosate’s Carcinogenicity (09:01) Scientific Consensus on Glyphosate's Dangers (15:06) Mechanisms of DNA Damage and Cancer Development (24:06) The Role of Glyphosate in Cancer Risk (43:28) The Silencing of Scientist From Speaking Out (47:28) The Organic Food Debate (49:20) Legislative Challenges and Pesticide Liability (52:12) EPA Labels and Legal Immunity (58:27) Threat to the Fertility of an Entire Generation (1:11:18) A National Security Issue (1:19:27) The Farm Bill Victory (1:21:13) Hope in Activism Dr. Alexandra Muñoz

Aaron Siri

66,281 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

MONSANTO SEEKS LIABILITY PROTECTION Facing billions in damages from its cancer-causing chemical pesticides, Monsanto is seeking a free pass in the form of liability protection. Should they get it? #delbigtree #follow #thehighwire #watch #jeffereyjaxen #bayer #Monsanto #glyphosate #cancer #rfkjr #maha
1:10

MONSANTO SEEKS LIABILITY PROTECTION Facing billions in damages from its cancer-causing chemical pesticides, Monsanto is seeking a free pass in the form of liability protection. Should they get it? #delbigtree #follow #thehighwire #watch #jeffereyjaxen #bayer #Monsanto #glyphosate #cancer #rfkjr #maha

The HighWire

14,452 просмотров • 1 год назад

While we are all focused on the corruption at the DOJ and the Epstein debacle, the sellouts in Washington are using the opportunity to push for vaccine-like immunity to lawsuits for cancer-causing pesticide manufacturers. MAHA is being betrayed again—this time by the EPA and Congress. New and more dangerous poisons are being sprayed on our food, including mRNA pesticides! That’s right—pesticides made from the same dangerous mRNA tech the government is finally admitting is killing our children. Is this MAHA? Dr. Alexandra Muñoz Alex Jones
0:42

While we are all focused on the corruption at the DOJ and the Epstein debacle, the sellouts in Washington are using the opportunity to push for vaccine-like immunity to lawsuits for cancer-causing pesticide manufacturers. MAHA is being betrayed again—this time by the EPA and Congress. New and more dangerous poisons are being sprayed on our food, including mRNA pesticides! That’s right—pesticides made from the same dangerous mRNA tech the government is finally admitting is killing our children. Is this MAHA? Dr. Alexandra Muñoz Alex Jones

Tom Renz

19,453 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

I still can’t get an answer from Republican leadership: why does their farm bill shield pesticide companies like Bayer-Monsanto from liability for selling toxic pesticides that cause cancer? If the products are so safe, what are they so afraid of?
0:45

I still can’t get an answer from Republican leadership: why does their farm bill shield pesticide companies like Bayer-Monsanto from liability for selling toxic pesticides that cause cancer? If the products are so safe, what are they so afraid of?

Rep. Jim McGovern

80,794 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The Republicans' farm bill is a BETRAYAL of MAHA. It would: 🛢️Prevent communities from regulating pesticides. 🤮Allow more toxins dumped into our water. ☠️Give CORPORATE IMMUNITY to companies that make cancer-causing chemicals. Trump & RFK lied to win. I’m taking them on.
2:33

The Republicans' farm bill is a BETRAYAL of MAHA. It would: 🛢️Prevent communities from regulating pesticides. 🤮Allow more toxins dumped into our water. ☠️Give CORPORATE IMMUNITY to companies that make cancer-causing chemicals. Trump & RFK lied to win. I’m taking them on.

Rep. Jim McGovern

15,778 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨PESTICIDE IMMUNITY EMERGENCY!!!🚨 WHILE YOU WERE WITH FAMILY OVER THE HOLIDAYS, CONGRESS MOVED TO PROTECT PESTICIDE COMPANIES FROM CANCER AND OTHER LAWSUITS. Reshare this now! Congress is quietly sneaking Section 453 into the spending bill— and Republicans like Congressman Mike Simpson Sen. Lisa Murkowski Speaker Mike Johnson are helping pesticide giants dodge liability. Section 453 gives legal immunity to chemical companies—even if their product harms your kids. Congressman Mike Simpson calls it a “labeling clarification.” That’s a lie. It’s a free pass for Bayer, Syngenta, and every foreign manufacturer dumping poison on U.S. soil. If this passes, you won’t be able to sue—even if you’re harmed. NO MORE IMMUNITY FOR CORPORATE POISON. Kill Section 453!!! SAVE OUR FARMERS!!! House Appropriations *Thanks Dr. Alexandra Muñoz for keeping this on our radar!
0:50

🚨PESTICIDE IMMUNITY EMERGENCY!!!🚨 WHILE YOU WERE WITH FAMILY OVER THE HOLIDAYS, CONGRESS MOVED TO PROTECT PESTICIDE COMPANIES FROM CANCER AND OTHER LAWSUITS. Reshare this now! Congress is quietly sneaking Section 453 into the spending bill— and Republicans like Congressman Mike Simpson Sen. Lisa Murkowski Speaker Mike Johnson are helping pesticide giants dodge liability. Section 453 gives legal immunity to chemical companies—even if their product harms your kids. Congressman Mike Simpson calls it a “labeling clarification.” That’s a lie. It’s a free pass for Bayer, Syngenta, and every foreign manufacturer dumping poison on U.S. soil. If this passes, you won’t be able to sue—even if you’re harmed. NO MORE IMMUNITY FOR CORPORATE POISON. Kill Section 453!!! SAVE OUR FARMERS!!! House Appropriations *Thanks Dr. Alexandra Muñoz for keeping this on our radar!

SAVE BEEF 🇺🇸 BeefMaps.com

463,539 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

This farmer just said the quiet part out loud. “I was nothing more than a serf on the land.” “A chemically-addicted farmer beholden to all these large ag conglomerates.” “Monsanto.” “Big seed companies.” But Kevin Fulton escaped. He transitioned his Nebraska farm to an organic, regenerative operation in 2002. “I can’t tell you how good that feels to not have all those gorillas on your back.” Now, he’s warning that pesticide companies are threatening to put countless farmers at risk with their push for a federal liability shield from lawsuits over harms caused by pesticides. “We have to be able to… stand up against them and have some type of recourse if there’s damages.” The stakes could not be higher as Congress debates the 2026 Farm Bill. The House voted to strip the pesticide liability shield out, but it’s still unclear if the Senate will vote to put it back in. And on top of that, Congress must decide if this Farm Bill will provide vital support for farmers to transition from conventional pesticide and chemical farming to regenerative practices. Regenerative farming protects human health, restores soil health, and empowers farmers to keep their profits out of the hands of Big Ag corporations that treat them like serfs on their own land. This Farm Bill is a pivotal moment for independent farmers. Read our new blog below to find out how Congress can empower farmers and how you can make your voice heard:🧵
1:46

This farmer just said the quiet part out loud. “I was nothing more than a serf on the land.” “A chemically-addicted farmer beholden to all these large ag conglomerates.” “Monsanto.” “Big seed companies.” But Kevin Fulton escaped. He transitioned his Nebraska farm to an organic, regenerative operation in 2002. “I can’t tell you how good that feels to not have all those gorillas on your back.” Now, he’s warning that pesticide companies are threatening to put countless farmers at risk with their push for a federal liability shield from lawsuits over harms caused by pesticides. “We have to be able to… stand up against them and have some type of recourse if there’s damages.” The stakes could not be higher as Congress debates the 2026 Farm Bill. The House voted to strip the pesticide liability shield out, but it’s still unclear if the Senate will vote to put it back in. And on top of that, Congress must decide if this Farm Bill will provide vital support for farmers to transition from conventional pesticide and chemical farming to regenerative practices. Regenerative farming protects human health, restores soil health, and empowers farmers to keep their profits out of the hands of Big Ag corporations that treat them like serfs on their own land. This Farm Bill is a pivotal moment for independent farmers. Read our new blog below to find out how Congress can empower farmers and how you can make your voice heard:🧵

Farm Action

24,904 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Pesticide manufacturers, corporations, are being granted immunity for causing cancer to farmers The is a very controversial provision provision in the 2026 House Farm Bill (Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026) It would make the EPA’s federal pesticide label the sole authority on safety warnings It then prohibits states, localities, or courts from requiring additional warnings on labels or holding manufacturers liable for “failure to warn” if the product follows the EPA-approved label This cleverly creates a federal liability shield for pesticide companies likeBayer against lawsuits claiming inadequate warnings about health risks One of the big ones is cancers like non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma It does not grant blanket immunity to farmers or users, instead it protects the manufacturers of pesticides from lawsuits
0:33

Pesticide manufacturers, corporations, are being granted immunity for causing cancer to farmers The is a very controversial provision provision in the 2026 House Farm Bill (Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026) It would make the EPA’s federal pesticide label the sole authority on safety warnings It then prohibits states, localities, or courts from requiring additional warnings on labels or holding manufacturers liable for “failure to warn” if the product follows the EPA-approved label This cleverly creates a federal liability shield for pesticide companies likeBayer against lawsuits claiming inadequate warnings about health risks One of the big ones is cancers like non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma It does not grant blanket immunity to farmers or users, instead it protects the manufacturers of pesticides from lawsuits

Wall Street Apes

15,554 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The Liberals have tried and failed twice in passing their so-called "online harms" bill to restrict what Canadians say online. I called on the government to kill its censorship plans once and for all.
9:54

The Liberals have tried and failed twice in passing their so-called "online harms" bill to restrict what Canadians say online. I called on the government to kill its censorship plans once and for all.

Andrew Lawton

79,051 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

🚨NEW FEDERAL BILL WOULD STRIP PFIZER AND MODERNA OF PREP ACT LIABILITY SHIELD FOR COVID SHOT HARMS The LIABLE Act would unleash a TSUNAMI of lawsuits from millions of vaccine-injured Americans—likely driving both companies into BANKRUPTCY. Introduced by Chip Roy, H.R. 1432 sets the stage for a long-overdue legal reckoning. Shannon Joy
0:47

🚨NEW FEDERAL BILL WOULD STRIP PFIZER AND MODERNA OF PREP ACT LIABILITY SHIELD FOR COVID SHOT HARMS The LIABLE Act would unleash a TSUNAMI of lawsuits from millions of vaccine-injured Americans—likely driving both companies into BANKRUPTCY. Introduced by Chip Roy, H.R. 1432 sets the stage for a long-overdue legal reckoning. Shannon Joy

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

22,856 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

“It’s professional wrestling and you have to sell the other persons moves.” Hidden gold from the 🐐 Bill Simmons for anyone working tv/radio/podcast land
0:22

“It’s professional wrestling and you have to sell the other persons moves.” Hidden gold from the 🐐 Bill Simmons for anyone working tv/radio/podcast land

Kane Cornes

41,870 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

This needs immediate attention American Surgeon Dr Elizabeth Potter blowing the whistle on a new bill Congress just put out The new bill takes away insurance companies liability to have to pay for breast cancer reconstructive surgery on all high risk prevention patients “There is a bill that has been introduced in Congress that, on the outside, looks like it might be a really good thing for the patients that I care for, for patients affected by breast cancer. But on the inside, there's some real problems with it, and I need your help in raising awareness about that. So when I see a patient who has breast cancer or a risk of breast cancer, there's one thing that I always say to them, and it's so important. It's that the Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act of 1998 guarantees that if their insurance company covers their mastectomy, they have to cover their reconstruction. So as you can imagine, when women hear that, they're so relieved, right? They're like, "Okay, I have to lose my breast, but I'm gonna be able to have reconstruction." That all changes “The number one thing is that previously in the Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act, coverage for all breast reconstruction really hinged on one thing, and that was if your insurance covers your mastectomy, they have to cover your reconstruction. When I read this new bill, I looked for that, and what I saw was that they had changed that fundamental thing. They changed that to say now reconstruction hinges on a diagnosis of breast cancer. That may sound similar, but that means that all of our patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2, all of our patients with other high risk for breast cancer, they would not have coverage for breast reconstruction under this new act, and there's no other thing that's providing coverage. So this new amendment would remove coverage for breast reconstruction for all of those patients” The bill limits coverage to those with a formal breast cancer diagnosis (excluding high-risk preventive cases like BRCA1/2 mutations) and tying reimbursements to outdated CPT codes instead of modern ones (like S codes for muscle-sparing reconstructions).
4:31

This needs immediate attention American Surgeon Dr Elizabeth Potter blowing the whistle on a new bill Congress just put out The new bill takes away insurance companies liability to have to pay for breast cancer reconstructive surgery on all high risk prevention patients “There is a bill that has been introduced in Congress that, on the outside, looks like it might be a really good thing for the patients that I care for, for patients affected by breast cancer. But on the inside, there's some real problems with it, and I need your help in raising awareness about that. So when I see a patient who has breast cancer or a risk of breast cancer, there's one thing that I always say to them, and it's so important. It's that the Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act of 1998 guarantees that if their insurance company covers their mastectomy, they have to cover their reconstruction. So as you can imagine, when women hear that, they're so relieved, right? They're like, "Okay, I have to lose my breast, but I'm gonna be able to have reconstruction." That all changes “The number one thing is that previously in the Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act, coverage for all breast reconstruction really hinged on one thing, and that was if your insurance covers your mastectomy, they have to cover your reconstruction. When I read this new bill, I looked for that, and what I saw was that they had changed that fundamental thing. They changed that to say now reconstruction hinges on a diagnosis of breast cancer. That may sound similar, but that means that all of our patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2, all of our patients with other high risk for breast cancer, they would not have coverage for breast reconstruction under this new act, and there's no other thing that's providing coverage. So this new amendment would remove coverage for breast reconstruction for all of those patients” The bill limits coverage to those with a formal breast cancer diagnosis (excluding high-risk preventive cases like BRCA1/2 mutations) and tying reimbursements to outdated CPT codes instead of modern ones (like S codes for muscle-sparing reconstructions).

Wall Street Apes

77,473 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

BREAKING: 70% of Americans OPPOSE Trump’s pesticide liability shield. This would be a severe betrayal of MAHA. Republicans are on the verge of handing Bayer-Monsanto total immunity to mass poison Americans with glyphosate in the 2026 Farm Bill. And Trump supports it. Not only that, but Trump’s DOJ is also pushing for the Supreme Court to hand pesticide companies a liability shield in a case later this month, regardless of whether Congress passes it in the Farm Bill. Americans overwhelmingly oppose this. MAHA voted to remove the liability shield for vaccines, not to expand it to yet another poison industry. Leslie Manookian Jeffrey A Tucker Brownstone Institute
0:37

BREAKING: 70% of Americans OPPOSE Trump’s pesticide liability shield. This would be a severe betrayal of MAHA. Republicans are on the verge of handing Bayer-Monsanto total immunity to mass poison Americans with glyphosate in the 2026 Farm Bill. And Trump supports it. Not only that, but Trump’s DOJ is also pushing for the Supreme Court to hand pesticide companies a liability shield in a case later this month, regardless of whether Congress passes it in the Farm Bill. Americans overwhelmingly oppose this. MAHA voted to remove the liability shield for vaccines, not to expand it to yet another poison industry. Leslie Manookian Jeffrey A Tucker Brownstone Institute

Health Freedom Defense Fund

36,844 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

While They SPRAY GLYPHOSATE OVER THE WOODS Bayer Attempts To LIMIT ITS LEGAL LIABILITY!!! Glyphosate has become the most widely used herbicide in Canadian forestry and many believe that not only does it contribute to causing fires but it can also cause cancer!! Bayer AG bought Monsanto in 2018 so they now own RoundUp and its main ingredient is glyphosate which causes non-Hodgkin lymphoma cancer so the company is now attempting to limit its legal liability. Meanwhile Metro Vancouver residents are being asked to register their fireplaces and wood stoves by Sept. 15 or face fines! In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth exposes Bayer and the Canadian government for the harms they are doing with glyphosate! Watch the full video report here:
2:59

While They SPRAY GLYPHOSATE OVER THE WOODS Bayer Attempts To LIMIT ITS LEGAL LIABILITY!!! Glyphosate has become the most widely used herbicide in Canadian forestry and many believe that not only does it contribute to causing fires but it can also cause cancer!! Bayer AG bought Monsanto in 2018 so they now own RoundUp and its main ingredient is glyphosate which causes non-Hodgkin lymphoma cancer so the company is now attempting to limit its legal liability. Meanwhile Metro Vancouver residents are being asked to register their fireplaces and wood stoves by Sept. 15 or face fines! In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth exposes Bayer and the Canadian government for the harms they are doing with glyphosate! Watch the full video report here:

Dan Dicks

159,638 просмотров • 1 год назад

38 billion dollars to ICE and around 26 billion dollars to CBP bill have been passed early this morning. This means more resources, stronger enforcement, and a serious boost for the agencies on the front line of the border crisis. One of the biggest pieces is that ICE would have more power to arrest criminal illegal immigrants as they are released from jails in sanctuary cities, cutting through the local protection games that have kept dangerous people shielded from federal enforcement. Well done.
0:42

38 billion dollars to ICE and around 26 billion dollars to CBP bill have been passed early this morning. This means more resources, stronger enforcement, and a serious boost for the agencies on the front line of the border crisis. One of the biggest pieces is that ICE would have more power to arrest criminal illegal immigrants as they are released from jails in sanctuary cities, cutting through the local protection games that have kept dangerous people shielded from federal enforcement. Well done.

ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸

12,937 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Thomas Massie is sounding the alarm. Congress is on the brink of passing a liability shield for pesticide companies, like Bayer, who give Americans cancer. Bayer is a foreign company, but Congress wants to give them total immunity to mass poison Americans with glyphosate. “This is not to grant farmers’ immunity.” “This is to grant the corporations immunity.” “If farmers contract a form of cancer or non-Hodgson’s lymphoma from this chemical, if this makes it into the Farm Bill, you won’t be able to sue for that.” This liability shield would be a complete betrayal of the MAHA movement. But House Republicans are on the brink of passing it anyway, and President Trump is urging them to do it. There is still time to fight back. We need all hands on deck to stop this. Here’s how you can take action: Use the link below for a step-by-step guide to urge Congress to remove Sections 10205, 10206, 10207 and portions of 10201 from the Farm Bill in order to preserve Americans’ right to sue pesticide companies when their products poison us:🧵 Thomas Massie
0:33

Thomas Massie is sounding the alarm. Congress is on the brink of passing a liability shield for pesticide companies, like Bayer, who give Americans cancer. Bayer is a foreign company, but Congress wants to give them total immunity to mass poison Americans with glyphosate. “This is not to grant farmers’ immunity.” “This is to grant the corporations immunity.” “If farmers contract a form of cancer or non-Hodgson’s lymphoma from this chemical, if this makes it into the Farm Bill, you won’t be able to sue for that.” This liability shield would be a complete betrayal of the MAHA movement. But House Republicans are on the brink of passing it anyway, and President Trump is urging them to do it. There is still time to fight back. We need all hands on deck to stop this. Here’s how you can take action: Use the link below for a step-by-step guide to urge Congress to remove Sections 10205, 10206, 10207 and portions of 10201 from the Farm Bill in order to preserve Americans’ right to sue pesticide companies when their products poison us:🧵 Thomas Massie

Stand for Health Freedom

435,911 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

.President Donald J. Trump: "To further help farmers recovering from the Biden catastrophe, we used money taken from tariffs...we gave you $12B in farm relief...I'm also asking Congress to quickly pass the new Farm Bill. And today, I'm promising to request additional farm relief for our great patriots in the next funding bill."
0:41

.President Donald J. Trump: "To further help farmers recovering from the Biden catastrophe, we used money taken from tariffs...we gave you $12B in farm relief...I'm also asking Congress to quickly pass the new Farm Bill. And today, I'm promising to request additional farm relief for our great patriots in the next funding bill."

Rapid Response 47

127,045 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад