Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

🐰🕳️ The Flock Data Sets Rabbit Hole Goes Deep! Most people think Flock cameras just read plates. It’s a full data‑mining stack where simple captures become patterns, and patterns become evidence.

Jason Bassler

74,002 subscribers

58,128 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологии

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

The cars are just the entry point. Flock is about tracking people, where they go, who they meet, and the patterns of their lives.

The cars are just the entry point. Flock is about tracking people, where they go, who they meet, and the patterns of their lives.

Truthseeker

11,661 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Become a Fishback Phone banker today so we win and block flock, stop data centers, and protect the Florida we love. Sign up here:

Become a Fishback Phone banker today so we win and block flock, stop data centers, and protect the Florida we love. Sign up here:

James Fishback

34,983 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

FOX: American cities reject Flock cameras due to privacy concerns ----- Glenn does a great job explaining the ins and outs of Flock cameras. He cites that they are unconstitutional, talks about the number of Flock cameras errors and says it is a mass surveillance system. He also asks what would Fauci have done during the lockdowns with Flock cameras? Flock cameras are an upgrade to the governments "lockdown system" and the they will try to use them again for lockdown 2.0. I think Glenn makes a misstep when he says the cameras must be used constitutionally. There is no way to use them constitutionally - they record without a warrant by default. The only way these tools can conform to the constitution is to remove them and not use them. Lastly, FOX repeats the lie that Flock cameras data is deleted in 30 days. Flock contractually obligates clients keep cameras live and recording and has even turned them back on in municipalities that have tried to shut them down. Flock wants the data above all else and that implies they are keeping the data permanently and selling the data illegally.

FOX: American cities reject Flock cameras due to privacy concerns ----- Glenn does a great job explaining the ins and outs of Flock cameras. He cites that they are unconstitutional, talks about the number of Flock cameras errors and says it is a mass surveillance system. He also asks what would Fauci have done during the lockdowns with Flock cameras? Flock cameras are an upgrade to the governments "lockdown system" and the they will try to use them again for lockdown 2.0. I think Glenn makes a misstep when he says the cameras must be used constitutionally. There is no way to use them constitutionally - they record without a warrant by default. The only way these tools can conform to the constitution is to remove them and not use them. Lastly, FOX repeats the lie that Flock cameras data is deleted in 30 days. Flock contractually obligates clients keep cameras live and recording and has even turned them back on in municipalities that have tried to shut them down. Flock wants the data above all else and that implies they are keeping the data permanently and selling the data illegally.

Orwell Day

25,952 просмотров • 20 дней назад

🚨 THE CEO OF FLOCK JUST SAID THE QUIET PART OUT LOUD — AND PEOPLE ARE LOSING IT Remember when Flock cameras were only supposed to read license plates? Apparently that's not enough anymore. Now we're talking about AI that can find a vehicle from a simple description. Microphones that are always listening for so called "sounds of distress." Drones that can be launched automatically after a 911 call. And camera networks that can follow movement across entire cities. Every year the cameras get smarter. The databases get bigger. The AI gets more powerful. And the amount of information being collected keeps growing. Then came the comment that really got people's attention. The CEO behind Flock, one of the largest camera networks in America reportedly compared people who map camera locations to terrorists. Think about that for a second. The cameras aren't the problem. The people tracking the cameras are. Some people see a tool that makes communities safer. Others see a system that knows where you've been, where you are, and eventually where you're likely to go next. If mapping Flock cameras makes you a "terrorist," what does that make the people putting cameras everywhere?

🚨 THE CEO OF FLOCK JUST SAID THE QUIET PART OUT LOUD — AND PEOPLE ARE LOSING IT Remember when Flock cameras were only supposed to read license plates? Apparently that's not enough anymore. Now we're talking about AI that can find a vehicle from a simple description. Microphones that are always listening for so called "sounds of distress." Drones that can be launched automatically after a 911 call. And camera networks that can follow movement across entire cities. Every year the cameras get smarter. The databases get bigger. The AI gets more powerful. And the amount of information being collected keeps growing. Then came the comment that really got people's attention. The CEO behind Flock, one of the largest camera networks in America reportedly compared people who map camera locations to terrorists. Think about that for a second. The cameras aren't the problem. The people tracking the cameras are. Some people see a tool that makes communities safer. Others see a system that knows where you've been, where you are, and eventually where you're likely to go next. If mapping Flock cameras makes you a "terrorist," what does that make the people putting cameras everywhere?

HustleBitch

318,905 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨Genesee County uses Flock cameras to capture and search vehicle data. But when Kettering University student Josh Tewolde requested records showing where the cameras are, who accessed the data and whether his vehicle was scanned, the county withheld key information. Its excuse? The records belong to Flock, a private contractor. But the county’s own contract says it owns the data. Josh is suing because government should not be able to hide public surveillance records behind a private company. If the government uses the cameras, the public deserves transparency.

🚨Genesee County uses Flock cameras to capture and search vehicle data. But when Kettering University student Josh Tewolde requested records showing where the cameras are, who accessed the data and whether his vehicle was scanned, the county withheld key information. Its excuse? The records belong to Flock, a private contractor. But the county’s own contract says it owns the data. Josh is suing because government should not be able to hide public surveillance records behind a private company. If the government uses the cameras, the public deserves transparency.

Mackinac Center

2,196,028 просмотров • 11 дней назад

Do Flock Cameras Solve Crime? Prevent Crime? Or Just Record It? Turns out, there’s no independent, peer-reviewed study showing that Flock reduces crime. The strongest research saying Flock SOLVES crime is a white paper, written by Flock, using Flock's own data. In their own paper, Flock admits the core question, whether these crimes 'otherwise would have remained unsolved in the first place’... was never tested. And that question, in their own words, is 'unlikely to be solved at scale via quantitative analysis.' The strongest independent evidence for ALPR technology closing cases is a 2019 study, of a different company's cameras, which found clearance gains for auto theft and robbery that WERE NOT statistically significant once researchers controlled for other factors. The authors themselves said further assessment was needed. That's it. That's the evidence behind 100,000+ cameras. Flock Garrett Langley

Do Flock Cameras Solve Crime? Prevent Crime? Or Just Record It? Turns out, there’s no independent, peer-reviewed study showing that Flock reduces crime. The strongest research saying Flock SOLVES crime is a white paper, written by Flock, using Flock's own data. In their own paper, Flock admits the core question, whether these crimes 'otherwise would have remained unsolved in the first place’... was never tested. And that question, in their own words, is 'unlikely to be solved at scale via quantitative analysis.' The strongest independent evidence for ALPR technology closing cases is a 2019 study, of a different company's cameras, which found clearance gains for auto theft and robbery that WERE NOT statistically significant once researchers controlled for other factors. The authors themselves said further assessment was needed. That's it. That's the evidence behind 100,000+ cameras. Flock Garrett Langley

Tyler Oliveira

71,647 просмотров • 28 дней назад

Victor Davis Hanson: What’s the Point of Flock Cameras if You’re Just Going To Let Violent Criminals Out of Jail Anyways Flock cameras are popping up in communities across America, but are they stopping crime or creating a nationwide surveillance network? These cameras track vehicles, use facial recognition technology, and collect data on where law-abiding Americans go every day. Is this the future of public safety—or the rise of Big Brother? Full video: Victor Davis Hanson

Victor Davis Hanson: What’s the Point of Flock Cameras if You’re Just Going To Let Violent Criminals Out of Jail Anyways Flock cameras are popping up in communities across America, but are they stopping crime or creating a nationwide surveillance network? These cameras track vehicles, use facial recognition technology, and collect data on where law-abiding Americans go every day. Is this the future of public safety—or the rise of Big Brother? Full video: Victor Davis Hanson

Daily Signal

20,249 просмотров • 24 дней назад

🚨 THEY’RE LYING TO YOU — FLOCK ISN’T LOSING, THEY’RE IN OVER 6,000 CITIES AND STILL EXPANDING They’re trying to convince everyone that Flock is in trouble because a few towns voted against the cameras. But look at what’s actually happening. Even in towns where almost 100% of residents spoke out against Flock, city councils still found ways to keep the system or delay real action. Flock is already in over 6,000 cities... basically most of the country. They’re putting cameras near playgrounds and trails where there are no cars, just kids. And when people try to cover or remove them, police show up fast. Flock isn’t shrinking. They’re getting bolder. What do you think is really going on with these surveillance cameras?

🚨 THEY’RE LYING TO YOU — FLOCK ISN’T LOSING, THEY’RE IN OVER 6,000 CITIES AND STILL EXPANDING They’re trying to convince everyone that Flock is in trouble because a few towns voted against the cameras. But look at what’s actually happening. Even in towns where almost 100% of residents spoke out against Flock, city councils still found ways to keep the system or delay real action. Flock is already in over 6,000 cities... basically most of the country. They’re putting cameras near playgrounds and trails where there are no cars, just kids. And when people try to cover or remove them, police show up fast. Flock isn’t shrinking. They’re getting bolder. What do you think is really going on with these surveillance cameras?

HustleBitch

28,401 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

NEW: Flock cameras wrongly flag innocent driver’s plate as stolen, leading to him being surrounded by police over a data entry error. A 15-year automotive journalist in Plymouth, Minnesota, experienced something he had never experienced. He was surrounded by multiple police officers while simply returning an Amazon package after Flock Safety cameras flagged his license plate as stolen. The alert came from a flawed NCIC entry where his California plate was incorrectly logged as “34 DTM” instead of the full “34 03 DTM.” Officers responded to the Flock hit and detained him for over an hour until he could prove the vehicle was legitimately his. Flock cameras are unconstitutional.

NEW: Flock cameras wrongly flag innocent driver’s plate as stolen, leading to him being surrounded by police over a data entry error. A 15-year automotive journalist in Plymouth, Minnesota, experienced something he had never experienced. He was surrounded by multiple police officers while simply returning an Amazon package after Flock Safety cameras flagged his license plate as stolen. The alert came from a flawed NCIC entry where his California plate was incorrectly logged as “34 DTM” instead of the full “34 03 DTM.” Officers responded to the Flock hit and detained him for over an hour until he could prove the vehicle was legitimately his. Flock cameras are unconstitutional.

The Facts Dude 🤙🏽

15,749 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Norfolk, Virginia has been quietly installing hundreds of Flock cameras enabling mass, warrantless surveillance that tracks innocent people’s movements A federal judge has sided with Americans and ordered locations public “A federal judge in Norfolk has made the locations of more than 600 flock safety surveillance cameras across Hampton Roads public. The first time such a list has ever been released. Local cities and counties had previously denied requests for this information, citing Virginia's open records law and critical infrastructure protections. But now a federal lawsuit claims the city's use of these cameras violates Fourth Amendment rights, which protects against unreasonable search and seizures. The complaint filed The Flock system, filed in 2024, seeks to stop Norfolk's use of the Flock system and erase the data already collected.” Flock Cameras offer - Privacy Erosion and Mass Surveillance - Indiscriminate Data Collection - National Data Sharing - Unauthorized Access by Federal Agencies - Easy Exploitation for hacking, many using just a USB stick with no mandatory multi-factor authentication and credentials - Lack of Transparency and Oversight

Norfolk, Virginia has been quietly installing hundreds of Flock cameras enabling mass, warrantless surveillance that tracks innocent people’s movements A federal judge has sided with Americans and ordered locations public “A federal judge in Norfolk has made the locations of more than 600 flock safety surveillance cameras across Hampton Roads public. The first time such a list has ever been released. Local cities and counties had previously denied requests for this information, citing Virginia's open records law and critical infrastructure protections. But now a federal lawsuit claims the city's use of these cameras violates Fourth Amendment rights, which protects against unreasonable search and seizures. The complaint filed The Flock system, filed in 2024, seeks to stop Norfolk's use of the Flock system and erase the data already collected.” Flock Cameras offer - Privacy Erosion and Mass Surveillance - Indiscriminate Data Collection - National Data Sharing - Unauthorized Access by Federal Agencies - Easy Exploitation for hacking, many using just a USB stick with no mandatory multi-factor authentication and credentials - Lack of Transparency and Oversight

Wall Street Apes

160,550 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

DeSantis goes off on Flock cameras: "What the hell is going on with this? I think people are right to be concerned. I don't want to be in a situation where a handful of tech companies know everything about you and know where you are going."

DeSantis goes off on Flock cameras: "What the hell is going on with this? I think people are right to be concerned. I don't want to be in a situation where a handful of tech companies know everything about you and know where you are going."

TheBlaze

163,962 просмотров • 3 дней назад

BREAKING: The Bastrop City Council is so scared of their people that they held a council 2 hours away. What were the chickensh*ts talking about? Data centers and Flock cameras. Looks like they got the wrong idea about everything being bigger in Texas. We didn’t mean that to apply to their cowardice. #Flock #datacenters #bastroptx #ai

BREAKING: The Bastrop City Council is so scared of their people that they held a council 2 hours away. What were the chickensh*ts talking about? Data centers and Flock cameras. Looks like they got the wrong idea about everything being bigger in Texas. We didn’t mean that to apply to their cowardice. #Flock #datacenters #bastroptx #ai

Clayton Tucker

11,180 просмотров • 22 дней назад

A FOIA request revealed that, in just one town, 3rd parties (credit card companies, cell phone companies, alphabet agencies, retailers, foreign governments, etc...) accessed camera data more than 500,000 times in a 9 week period. "Flock Safety could not guarantee that it's not sharing information with federal agencies." No shit. Several municipalities in CT are "turning off" their Flock cameras in response to what one FOIA request revealed. The problem - the towns don't control/own the cameras nor the data they collect so they can't turn them off. They can instruct their employees to not access them but Flock, a private company funded *almost exclusively* (outside of people like Marc Andreessen & his ilk) by taxpayer dollars, owns the devices and the data. Plan accordingly... #rural #CT #police #crime #PoliceState #4thAmendment #14thAmendment #CivilRights #ALPR #cops #stalking #women #windsor #flock #SurveillanceState

A FOIA request revealed that, in just one town, 3rd parties (credit card companies, cell phone companies, alphabet agencies, retailers, foreign governments, etc...) accessed camera data more than 500,000 times in a 9 week period. "Flock Safety could not guarantee that it's not sharing information with federal agencies." No shit. Several municipalities in CT are "turning off" their Flock cameras in response to what one FOIA request revealed. The problem - the towns don't control/own the cameras nor the data they collect so they can't turn them off. They can instruct their employees to not access them but Flock, a private company funded almost exclusively (outside of people like Marc Andreessen & his ilk) by taxpayer dollars, owns the devices and the data. Plan accordingly... #rural #CT #police #crime #PoliceState #4thAmendment #14thAmendment #CivilRights #ALPR #cops #stalking #women #windsor #flock #SurveillanceState

Mrgunsngear

204,814 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Flock Safety's 100,000+ license plate cameras are supposed to fight crime—but from Troy, NY to cities nationwide, people are pushing back hard, and River Page went to find out why. It turns out the anti-Flock backlash is about way more than just cameras: it's a referendum on Big Tech building a surveillance world nobody asked for. Read River's full piece here:

Flock Safety's 100,000+ license plate cameras are supposed to fight crime—but from Troy, NY to cities nationwide, people are pushing back hard, and River Page went to find out why. It turns out the anti-Flock backlash is about way more than just cameras: it's a referendum on Big Tech building a surveillance world nobody asked for. Read River's full piece here:

The Free Press

10,418 просмотров • 11 дней назад

This is just a popular paved walking and biking path There are no cars here, there is no road for cars here Yet here is a Flock safety camera…. This isn’t being used to read license plates. It’s being used for mass surveillance Flock is expanding to locations where crime is more likely to occur…. In other words, mass surveillance

This is just a popular paved walking and biking path There are no cars here, there is no road for cars here Yet here is a Flock safety camera…. This isn’t being used to read license plates. It’s being used for mass surveillance Flock is expanding to locations where crime is more likely to occur…. In other words, mass surveillance

Wall Street Apes

215,800 просмотров • 26 дней назад

This is horrifying New information shows the Flock cameras wants to work with Uber and Lyft to have their millions of dash cams send all that live data back to flock “An incredibly dystopian Flock proposition just got leaked today. 404 Media released an article on it. Now, we all know Flock is bad, but even myself, I don't think we're cognizant on how much worse it could get and how quickly. In this leak, it detailed a presentation that Flock showed to the Georgia AG, trying to convince them to let them link to all Uber and Lyft cars, over three hundred and fifty thousand of them. Now, what you might not know is that every single Uber and Lyft has to have a live dash cam built into their car. So Flock wanted to link with those and have them start scanning plates and link it back to the Flock system. Now, this did not happen, but that's not to say it won't “ Uber and Lyft cameras already capture clear license-plate video and generate trillions of images Flock wanted to pull plate data and vehicle fingerprint details from those mobile cameras This would mean instead of only fixed pole-mounted ALPRs at intersections, you’d have 350,000+ to potentially millions of moving cameras filling gaps across cities and regions in near real time The ultimate mass surveillance live network

This is horrifying New information shows the Flock cameras wants to work with Uber and Lyft to have their millions of dash cams send all that live data back to flock “An incredibly dystopian Flock proposition just got leaked today. 404 Media released an article on it. Now, we all know Flock is bad, but even myself, I don't think we're cognizant on how much worse it could get and how quickly. In this leak, it detailed a presentation that Flock showed to the Georgia AG, trying to convince them to let them link to all Uber and Lyft cars, over three hundred and fifty thousand of them. Now, what you might not know is that every single Uber and Lyft has to have a live dash cam built into their car. So Flock wanted to link with those and have them start scanning plates and link it back to the Flock system. Now, this did not happen, but that's not to say it won't “ Uber and Lyft cameras already capture clear license-plate video and generate trillions of images Flock wanted to pull plate data and vehicle fingerprint details from those mobile cameras This would mean instead of only fixed pole-mounted ALPRs at intersections, you’d have 350,000+ to potentially millions of moving cameras filling gaps across cities and regions in near real time The ultimate mass surveillance live network

Wall Street Apes

137,132 просмотров • 21 дней назад

NSA WHISTLEBLOWER WARNS: FLOCK CAMERAS ARE BUILDING A 24/7 SURVEILLANCE GRID NSA whistleblower Thomas Drake warns that Flock cameras are not simply crime-fighting tools. They are becoming the backbone of a surveillance network capable of tracking ordinary Americans in real time. By outsourcing the infrastructure to private companies, government agencies can claim they are merely purchasing a service while gaining broad access to data that can monitor entire populations with far less oversight. It goes beyond license plates. Bluetooth signals, wireless transmissions, phones, smartwatches, and in-vehicle systems can all become digital beacons. Combined, those signals can map where you drive, who you visit, the events you attend, and how you move through your community. That data can be stored, searched, and shared far beyond the local police department that collected it. Thomas Drake explains how license-plate readers, Bluetooth, wireless transmissions, and connected-vehicle systems are converging into a de facto tracking grid for every American. And when private corporations operate that grid instead of the government, the constitutional guardrails become even weaker, creating a quiet backdoor for unchecked data collection and abuse.

NSA WHISTLEBLOWER WARNS: FLOCK CAMERAS ARE BUILDING A 24/7 SURVEILLANCE GRID NSA whistleblower Thomas Drake warns that Flock cameras are not simply crime-fighting tools. They are becoming the backbone of a surveillance network capable of tracking ordinary Americans in real time. By outsourcing the infrastructure to private companies, government agencies can claim they are merely purchasing a service while gaining broad access to data that can monitor entire populations with far less oversight. It goes beyond license plates. Bluetooth signals, wireless transmissions, phones, smartwatches, and in-vehicle systems can all become digital beacons. Combined, those signals can map where you drive, who you visit, the events you attend, and how you move through your community. That data can be stored, searched, and shared far beyond the local police department that collected it. Thomas Drake explains how license-plate readers, Bluetooth, wireless transmissions, and connected-vehicle systems are converging into a de facto tracking grid for every American. And when private corporations operate that grid instead of the government, the constitutional guardrails become even weaker, creating a quiet backdoor for unchecked data collection and abuse.

Redacted

15,830 просмотров • 1 день назад

Flock CEO Garrett Langley speaks up against the Los Angeles Police Department cancelling their contract with Flock He says the public just doesn’t understand what Flock cameras actually do, and that’s why they’re hesitant. He says he’s working to turn the cameras back on in LA “We gotta tighten up the policy, make sure everyone's aligned, and then turn it back on” He explains that Flock simply takes a static picture and isn’t collecting that much data This is just simply not true. We’ve literally seen their condor camera track people walking, the camera locks onto you and moves with you as you walk These people think we’re idiots He says the cameras don’t have facial recognition and that’s true, but they certainly have the ability to have facial recognition A simple software update could easily enable it. They are capturing high resolution photos and video of people Because clear face images are being recorded and retained, that footage could be run through facial recognition software by police or other agencies that have access to it, even if Flock itself is not doing the matching

Flock CEO Garrett Langley speaks up against the Los Angeles Police Department cancelling their contract with Flock He says the public just doesn’t understand what Flock cameras actually do, and that’s why they’re hesitant. He says he’s working to turn the cameras back on in LA “We gotta tighten up the policy, make sure everyone's aligned, and then turn it back on” He explains that Flock simply takes a static picture and isn’t collecting that much data This is just simply not true. We’ve literally seen their condor camera track people walking, the camera locks onto you and moves with you as you walk These people think we’re idiots He says the cameras don’t have facial recognition and that’s true, but they certainly have the ability to have facial recognition A simple software update could easily enable it. They are capturing high resolution photos and video of people Because clear face images are being recorded and retained, that footage could be run through facial recognition software by police or other agencies that have access to it, even if Flock itself is not doing the matching

Wall Street Apes

114,829 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

People are very uncomfortable with the fact that Flock Cameras investor Peter Thiel shared over 2,400 emails with Jeffrey Epstein and now Flock cameras are pointed at little kids playgrounds Just take this location, “Here's a flock camera pointed directly at the schoolyard, monitoring where each kid walks, how they get home, if there's an adult with them, which car is picking them up” But it even gets worse than this, I’ll provide in the video an area next to a kids water splash pad that has a huge amount of Flock cameras pointed right at it They say it’s because the cameras are there for enhanced security at high risk locations, but the connection to Epstein has people more than concerned about these camera placements

People are very uncomfortable with the fact that Flock Cameras investor Peter Thiel shared over 2,400 emails with Jeffrey Epstein and now Flock cameras are pointed at little kids playgrounds Just take this location, “Here's a flock camera pointed directly at the schoolyard, monitoring where each kid walks, how they get home, if there's an adult with them, which car is picking them up” But it even gets worse than this, I’ll provide in the video an area next to a kids water splash pad that has a huge amount of Flock cameras pointed right at it They say it’s because the cameras are there for enhanced security at high risk locations, but the connection to Epstein has people more than concerned about these camera placements

Wall Street Apes

200,275 просмотров • 27 дней назад

🚨 Flock cameras are commenting a lot more data than we think they are “They also monitor where you walk, what you do, what you say, what's on your phone when you walk by, and they spy on you all the time — These cameras utilize AI to track you and your family when you're out in public. They run, they run by a company, Palantir. This company claims that they just record movement of vehicles and they will reduce the crime rate 0. However, people much more educated than I on these cameras have proven this to be false” “Today I walked around and I noticed the one down by the bridge was pointed towards the courtyard and the field, not towards any roads. So why would it be pointed towards the river, not towards the streets, if it's just to monitor vehicles?” He’s right, I looked it up and they are collecting way more data than we think They create “vehicle fingerprints”of your car like color, make, model, stickers, dents and use AI for searches. Newer systems include video feeds and natural language queries. They can capture pedestrians, bystanders, and activities in view They are also using this data for “predictive policing.” You can be profiled before you do anything wrong Flock is not owned or operated by Palantir. Flock says they don’t share data with Palantir. However, Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund invested in Flock, and Flock’s data can integrate with platforms like Palantir’s for law enforcement analytics. Thiel co-founded Palantir, which does predictive policing and data fusion So I think there is very clearly more to this…. Flock cameras are the surveillance state being put up on America

🚨 Flock cameras are commenting a lot more data than we think they are “They also monitor where you walk, what you do, what you say, what's on your phone when you walk by, and they spy on you all the time — These cameras utilize AI to track you and your family when you're out in public. They run, they run by a company, Palantir. This company claims that they just record movement of vehicles and they will reduce the crime rate 0. However, people much more educated than I on these cameras have proven this to be false” “Today I walked around and I noticed the one down by the bridge was pointed towards the courtyard and the field, not towards any roads. So why would it be pointed towards the river, not towards the streets, if it's just to monitor vehicles?” He’s right, I looked it up and they are collecting way more data than we think They create “vehicle fingerprints”of your car like color, make, model, stickers, dents and use AI for searches. Newer systems include video feeds and natural language queries. They can capture pedestrians, bystanders, and activities in view They are also using this data for “predictive policing.” You can be profiled before you do anything wrong Flock is not owned or operated by Palantir. Flock says they don’t share data with Palantir. However, Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund invested in Flock, and Flock’s data can integrate with platforms like Palantir’s for law enforcement analytics. Thiel co-founded Palantir, which does predictive policing and data fusion So I think there is very clearly more to this…. Flock cameras are the surveillance state being put up on America

Wall Street Apes

211,371 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад