Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

The flu jab is fast becoming obsolete. With a recent study now showing negative efficacy. Dr Robert Sullivan testifying before the Senate panel - ‘Negative efficacy of 27% with the flu shot implying perhaps 1 in 4 cases were actually caused by the intervention.’ What a scam it is!

Kat A 🌸

86,879 subscribers

372,249 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Health & Wellness News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

The flu jab is fast becoming obsolete. With Dr Robert Sullivan highlighting a new study showing negative efficacy. ‘Negative efficacy of 27% with the flu shot implying perhaps a 1 in 4 cases were actually caused by the intervention.’ Maybe Trump should have listened to the experts.

The flu jab is fast becoming obsolete. With Dr Robert Sullivan highlighting a new study showing negative efficacy. ‘Negative efficacy of 27% with the flu shot implying perhaps a 1 in 4 cases were actually caused by the intervention.’ Maybe Trump should have listened to the experts.

Kat A 🌸

15,309 views • 9 months ago

Flu shot efficacy hit NEGATIVE last year? Doctor unloads the data in 60s Dr. Robert Sullivan: - “We’ve been trying since the 1930s… at best 60% effective” - “You need ~70 shots to prevent ONE case of flu” - “Doesn’t reduce hospitalizations or days off work” - “Last year the efficacy went negative… −27%” → meaning the shot may have actually caused more flu cases “There are other ways to prevent serious flu.” This clip from a longer interview is already sparking fierce debate. What do YOU make of this data? 1-minute clip — watch & reply with your take

Flu shot efficacy hit NEGATIVE last year? Doctor unloads the data in 60s Dr. Robert Sullivan: - “We’ve been trying since the 1930s… at best 60% effective” - “You need ~70 shots to prevent ONE case of flu” - “Doesn’t reduce hospitalizations or days off work” - “Last year the efficacy went negative… −27%” → meaning the shot may have actually caused more flu cases “There are other ways to prevent serious flu.” This clip from a longer interview is already sparking fierce debate. What do YOU make of this data? 1-minute clip — watch & reply with your take

Camus

93,635 views • 7 months ago

🚨💉 Flu Vaccine Scam “Large study at the Cleveland clinic - found that last year’s flu vaccine wasn’t effective” “In in fact, the flu vaccine had a negative efficacy - if you took the flu vaccination you were 26.9% more likely to contract influenza” Legacy media will NEVER tell you about this study.

🚨💉 Flu Vaccine Scam “Large study at the Cleveland clinic - found that last year’s flu vaccine wasn’t effective” “In in fact, the flu vaccine had a negative efficacy - if you took the flu vaccination you were 26.9% more likely to contract influenza” Legacy media will NEVER tell you about this study.

Concerned Citizen

163,154 views • 7 months ago

The public has been misled for years: flu vaccination rates rise, yet hospitalizations and deaths do not go down. Dr. Lynn Fynn reveals that the current flu shot now shows negative efficacy, making you 27% more likely to get the flu after taking it.

The public has been misled for years: flu vaccination rates rise, yet hospitalizations and deaths do not go down. Dr. Lynn Fynn reveals that the current flu shot now shows negative efficacy, making you 27% more likely to get the flu after taking it.

healthbot

16,395 views • 1 month ago

The public has been misled for years: flu vaccination rates rise, yet hospitalizations and deaths do not go down. Dr. Lynn Fynn reveals that the current flu shot now shows negative efficacy — making you 27% more likely to get the flu after taking it. This must be exposed.

The public has been misled for years: flu vaccination rates rise, yet hospitalizations and deaths do not go down. Dr. Lynn Fynn reveals that the current flu shot now shows negative efficacy — making you 27% more likely to get the flu after taking it. This must be exposed.

Dr. Simone Gold

38,706 views • 6 months ago

✅ RFK Jr. defends the Department of War 🇺🇸 ending the flu shot mandate. “These soldiers being sent over to fight for our freedoms should have some freedom, too.” “The flu shot is an intervention that is often ineffective, it has a 20% efficacy rate.” “There are studies that show that getting a flu shot actually increases the chance of a non-flu infection.” Secretary Kennedy

✅ RFK Jr. defends the Department of War 🇺🇸 ending the flu shot mandate. “These soldiers being sent over to fight for our freedoms should have some freedom, too.” “The flu shot is an intervention that is often ineffective, it has a 20% efficacy rate.” “There are studies that show that getting a flu shot actually increases the chance of a non-flu infection.” Secretary Kennedy

Children’s Health Defense

18,527 views • 2 months ago

Toby Rogers: "The COVID shots have negative efficacy after six months. Tell me how a shot with negative efficacy is saving lives and it has the worst side effect profile of any vaccine in human history. So how exactly is a vaccine with the worst side effects and negative efficacy saving lives? That's a preposterous claim." "What ended the COVID pandemic was the Omicron variant. It was more transmissible but less lethal. The vaccine, how many people it helped, I think it's an open debate. It could be a net negative."

Camus

288,615 views • 9 months ago

When the flu shot does the opposite of what it promises… New York Governor Kathy Hochul proudly rolled up her sleeve for the cameras. But optics shouldn’t be the focus. Efficacy should. So how is this year’s flu shot actually performing? Negatively. One of the largest recent studies followed 50,000 Cleveland Clinic employees during the 2024–2025 flu season. About 80% got the flu shot. The rest didn’t. The result won't surprise any of you. Those who got the shot had a 27% higher risk of getting the flu. Not only did it fail to protect but it was associated with more flu, not less. Negative efficacy. Every year, we’re told this is the tool and every year, it misses the mark. This year, the data suggests it made things worse. So maybe the problem isn’t vaccine “hesitancy.” Maybe it’s blind faith in a product that keeps failing while officials smile for the cameras and call it leadership. Asking hard questions isn’t reckless, but ignoring the answers is.

When the flu shot does the opposite of what it promises… New York Governor Kathy Hochul proudly rolled up her sleeve for the cameras. But optics shouldn’t be the focus. Efficacy should. So how is this year’s flu shot actually performing? Negatively. One of the largest recent studies followed 50,000 Cleveland Clinic employees during the 2024–2025 flu season. About 80% got the flu shot. The rest didn’t. The result won't surprise any of you. Those who got the shot had a 27% higher risk of getting the flu. Not only did it fail to protect but it was associated with more flu, not less. Negative efficacy. Every year, we’re told this is the tool and every year, it misses the mark. This year, the data suggests it made things worse. So maybe the problem isn’t vaccine “hesitancy.” Maybe it’s blind faith in a product that keeps failing while officials smile for the cameras and call it leadership. Asking hard questions isn’t reckless, but ignoring the answers is.

The HighWire

26,759 views • 6 months ago

According to a new study, people who took last winter's flu vaccine were 26.9% more likely to get influenza than the unvaccinated. "The influenza vaccine over last winter wasn't that effective. In fact, it had a negative efficacy of 26.9%." "In other words, if you took this flu vaccine, you were 26.9% more likely to get influenza."

According to a new study, people who took last winter's flu vaccine were 26.9% more likely to get influenza than the unvaccinated. "The influenza vaccine over last winter wasn't that effective. In fact, it had a negative efficacy of 26.9%." "In other words, if you took this flu vaccine, you were 26.9% more likely to get influenza."

Wide Awake Media

353,145 views • 6 months ago

"The COVID shots have negative efficacy after six months." "And it has the worst side effect profile of any vaccine in human history." "So how exactly is a vaccine with the worst side effects and negative efficacy saving lives?" "That's a preposterous claim."

Red Pill Dispenser

48,643 views • 9 months ago

The Truth Is Out... The Flu Vaccine Not Only DOESN'T Prevent Influenza & DOESN'T Lessen It's Symptoms... If You Get The Flu Vaccine You Are 27% MORE Likely To Get Influenza. A Recent Cleveland Clinic Study Reveals The Influenza Vaccine Carries A Negative Efficacy Of 26.9%! From The Study..."53,402 Cleveland Clinic employees were followed & studied for 25 weeks during the 2024-2025 flu season. Over the course of the study the cumulative incidence of influenza increased more rapidly among the vaccinated than the unvaccinated. Yielding a calculated vaccine effectiveness of −26.9%." The flu shot not only primes you for flu, it primes you for Coronavirus at 36% increased rate. Nordic Cochrane Group & British Medical Journal both have found, people are 4.4 times more likely to get a non flu infection. Many people get the flu shot & then get sick. They are getting an indistinguishable illness from the flu. The flu shot gives you pathogenic priming. It injures your immune system so that you're more likely to get a non flu viral upper respiratory infection. In fact, the PENTAGON published a study, in which they said the flu shot not only primes you for flu, it primes you for coronavirus. To determine military readiness, they had a placebo group & a vaccine group, to determine if the flu shot was protective against Coronavirus. The results showed those who received the flu shot were 36% more likely to get Coronavirus. That is not a lone study, there are at least 6 other major studies showing the same thing, if you get the flu shot, you're more likely to get Coronavirus. Flu Shot Ingredients: If you wouldn't eat or drink it, you wouldn't want to inject it either. MDCK: Canine Cocker Spaniel Kidney DNA M59 Adjuvant Squalene Oil: GMO Microbial caused 95% Gulf War Syndrome to Soldiers. MSG: Neurotoxin, Reproductive & Developmental Harm. Formaldehyde: Carcinogen & Poisonous to Internal Organs. Thimerosal Mercury: One of The Most Poisonous Substances Known. Even Minute Amounts Cause Damage. Aluminum: Cause of brain damage, dementia, seizures, coma & autism. Baculovirus Cell DNA: Virus insect pathogens. Neomycin Sulfate: Antibiotic that blocks B6 absorption causing uptake error epilepsy & antibiotic resistance. Polysorbate 80: Carcinogen that crosses the blood brain barrier. Phosphates: Toxic to bones & organs 👇Flu Vaccine 2024-2025 Negative Efficacy👇 👇Dept Of Defense Flu Vaccine Study👇 👇Flu Vaccine Causes 4.4 Times More Illness👇 Speakers: The Jimmy Dore Show & Dr John Campbell

The Truth Is Out... The Flu Vaccine Not Only DOESN'T Prevent Influenza & DOESN'T Lessen It's Symptoms... If You Get The Flu Vaccine You Are 27% MORE Likely To Get Influenza. A Recent Cleveland Clinic Study Reveals The Influenza Vaccine Carries A Negative Efficacy Of 26.9%! From The Study..."53,402 Cleveland Clinic employees were followed & studied for 25 weeks during the 2024-2025 flu season. Over the course of the study the cumulative incidence of influenza increased more rapidly among the vaccinated than the unvaccinated. Yielding a calculated vaccine effectiveness of −26.9%." The flu shot not only primes you for flu, it primes you for Coronavirus at 36% increased rate. Nordic Cochrane Group & British Medical Journal both have found, people are 4.4 times more likely to get a non flu infection. Many people get the flu shot & then get sick. They are getting an indistinguishable illness from the flu. The flu shot gives you pathogenic priming. It injures your immune system so that you're more likely to get a non flu viral upper respiratory infection. In fact, the PENTAGON published a study, in which they said the flu shot not only primes you for flu, it primes you for coronavirus. To determine military readiness, they had a placebo group & a vaccine group, to determine if the flu shot was protective against Coronavirus. The results showed those who received the flu shot were 36% more likely to get Coronavirus. That is not a lone study, there are at least 6 other major studies showing the same thing, if you get the flu shot, you're more likely to get Coronavirus. Flu Shot Ingredients: If you wouldn't eat or drink it, you wouldn't want to inject it either. MDCK: Canine Cocker Spaniel Kidney DNA M59 Adjuvant Squalene Oil: GMO Microbial caused 95% Gulf War Syndrome to Soldiers. MSG: Neurotoxin, Reproductive & Developmental Harm. Formaldehyde: Carcinogen & Poisonous to Internal Organs. Thimerosal Mercury: One of The Most Poisonous Substances Known. Even Minute Amounts Cause Damage. Aluminum: Cause of brain damage, dementia, seizures, coma & autism. Baculovirus Cell DNA: Virus insect pathogens. Neomycin Sulfate: Antibiotic that blocks B6 absorption causing uptake error epilepsy & antibiotic resistance. Polysorbate 80: Carcinogen that crosses the blood brain barrier. Phosphates: Toxic to bones & organs 👇Flu Vaccine 2024-2025 Negative Efficacy👇 👇Dept Of Defense Flu Vaccine Study👇 👇Flu Vaccine Causes 4.4 Times More Illness👇 Speakers: The Jimmy Dore Show & Dr John Campbell

Valerie Anne Smith

38,938 views • 1 year ago

Never had a flu shot never will!! Nic Hulscher drops the latest Cleveland Data showing this season’s flu jab increases your chances of getting the flu by 27%. And yet the madness continues!

Never had a flu shot never will!! Nic Hulscher drops the latest Cleveland Data showing this season’s flu jab increases your chances of getting the flu by 27%. And yet the madness continues!

Kat A 🌸

13,715 views • 6 months ago

New study: The Cleveland Clinic found that the influenza vaccine was not effective last winter “It had a negative efficacy of 26.9%. In other words, if you took this flu vaccine, you were 26.9% more likely to get influenza” Big Pharma makes $6.3 billion annually on this vaccine

New study: The Cleveland Clinic found that the influenza vaccine was not effective last winter “It had a negative efficacy of 26.9%. In other words, if you took this flu vaccine, you were 26.9% more likely to get influenza” Big Pharma makes $6.3 billion annually on this vaccine

Wall Street Apes

1,703,197 views • 1 year ago

"Tell me how a vaccine with negative efficacy is saving lives." It's not a riddle, the data show that Covid shots caused more harms than benefits.

"Tell me how a vaccine with negative efficacy is saving lives." It's not a riddle, the data show that Covid shots caused more harms than benefits.

Toby Rogers

310,567 views • 9 months ago

STUDY OF ENTIRE SPANISH REGION CONFIRMS FLU VACCINES FOR KIDS DON’T WORK NO reduction in flu cases OR hospitalizations after mass flu shot rollout to young children. This is not surprising given that the Cleveland Clinic found flu shots INCREASE risk of flu by 27%.

STUDY OF ENTIRE SPANISH REGION CONFIRMS FLU VACCINES FOR KIDS DON’T WORK NO reduction in flu cases OR hospitalizations after mass flu shot rollout to young children. This is not surprising given that the Cleveland Clinic found flu shots INCREASE risk of flu by 27%.

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

18,013 views • 1 month ago

FLU SEASON VAX? A Cleveland Clinic study found the flu vax increases your risk of flu by 27%. Another study linked the flu vax to a 340% rise in other viral infections. Lol. Pass. With 81,000 already hospitalized this year, try the "Contagion Kit" instead (next tweet).

FLU SEASON VAX? A Cleveland Clinic study found the flu vax increases your risk of flu by 27%. Another study linked the flu vax to a 340% rise in other viral infections. Lol. Pass. With 81,000 already hospitalized this year, try the "Contagion Kit" instead (next tweet).

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

11,156 views • 5 months ago

Dr. McCullough Explains Why People Always Seem to Get Sick After the Flu Shot He says he was getting sick “virtually every month,” not realizing that the flu shots he was taking could be causing the problem. According to the data, when you get the flu shot, your risk of catching the common cold “markedly increases.” And a new study from the Cleveland Clinic found that last year’s flu shot actually INCREASED the risk of catching the flu itself. The study stated: “In an analysis adjusted for age, sex, clinical nursing job, and employment location, the risk of influenza was SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER for the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated state, yielding a calculated vaccine effectiveness of NEGATIVE 26.9%.”

Dr. McCullough Explains Why People Always Seem to Get Sick After the Flu Shot He says he was getting sick “virtually every month,” not realizing that the flu shots he was taking could be causing the problem. According to the data, when you get the flu shot, your risk of catching the common cold “markedly increases.” And a new study from the Cleveland Clinic found that last year’s flu shot actually INCREASED the risk of catching the flu itself. The study stated: “In an analysis adjusted for age, sex, clinical nursing job, and employment location, the risk of influenza was SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER for the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated state, yielding a calculated vaccine effectiveness of NEGATIVE 26.9%.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

164,252 views • 5 months ago

A landmark study from the Cleveland Clinic—a mainstream, pro-vaccine institution—has revealed alarming data about this year's flu shot. The research, tracking over 53,000 clinic employees during the 2024-25 respiratory virus season, found a shocking negative vaccine effectiveness of -26.9%. This isn't just low effectiveness; it's NEGATIVE efficacy. Key Findings: • The cumulative incidence of influenza increased more rapidly among the VACCINATED than the unvaccinated. • After adjusting for variables, those who received the flu shot had a 26.9% HIGHER risk of contracting influenza. The Conclusion: Influenza vaccination was associated with a significantly higher risk of influenza. This isn't a fringe report. It's a peer-reviewed study from a top medical center, forcing a critical question: Why are health officials still aggressively promoting an intervention that the data shows can increase your risk of illness? The era of blind trust is over. It's time for informed consent.

A landmark study from the Cleveland Clinic—a mainstream, pro-vaccine institution—has revealed alarming data about this year's flu shot. The research, tracking over 53,000 clinic employees during the 2024-25 respiratory virus season, found a shocking negative vaccine effectiveness of -26.9%. This isn't just low effectiveness; it's NEGATIVE efficacy. Key Findings: • The cumulative incidence of influenza increased more rapidly among the VACCINATED than the unvaccinated. • After adjusting for variables, those who received the flu shot had a 26.9% HIGHER risk of contracting influenza. The Conclusion: Influenza vaccination was associated with a significantly higher risk of influenza. This isn't a fringe report. It's a peer-reviewed study from a top medical center, forcing a critical question: Why are health officials still aggressively promoting an intervention that the data shows can increase your risk of illness? The era of blind trust is over. It's time for informed consent.

Camus

271,878 views • 8 months ago

"Are the flu shots safe & effective? Absolutely NOT." -Dr Jeff Barke, MD "Stop listening to the media. Stop going to pharmacies. Start taking care of your own body." "We don't have a flu season...we have a drink too much, eat like crap, stay indoors & not enough sleep season." The Peer Reviewed Studies Showing Negative Efficacy... - Cleveland Clinic Study (Shrestha et al., 2024-2025 season): Those Vaccinated had a -26.9% effectiveness against flu. Translation? You are 27% more likely to get the flu. - Cowling study: Flu vaccine recipients faced 4.4X higher rate of non-flu infections...COVID & pneumonia, which is 440%! FLU-ZONE Ingredients... -Thimerosal Mercury in multi-dose vials used in hospital, pharmacy & corporate locations -Formaldehyde -Triton X 100 -Fertilized chicken eggs -Phosphate buffers (bone-toxic) -Lab-grown hemagglutinin antigens from harmful host cells Post-marketing reports adverse events... - Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) - Anaphylaxis & angioedema -Encephalomyelitis -Bell's palsy -Convulsions -Optic neuropathy -Thrombocytopenia -Apnea -Brachial neuritis -Stevens Johnson Syndrome Have you ever gotten a flu shot? Did it harm your health? Share your experience below...

"Are the flu shots safe & effective? Absolutely NOT." -Dr Jeff Barke, MD "Stop listening to the media. Stop going to pharmacies. Start taking care of your own body." "We don't have a flu season...we have a drink too much, eat like crap, stay indoors & not enough sleep season." The Peer Reviewed Studies Showing Negative Efficacy... - Cleveland Clinic Study (Shrestha et al., 2024-2025 season): Those Vaccinated had a -26.9% effectiveness against flu. Translation? You are 27% more likely to get the flu. - Cowling study: Flu vaccine recipients faced 4.4X higher rate of non-flu infections...COVID & pneumonia, which is 440%! FLU-ZONE Ingredients... -Thimerosal Mercury in multi-dose vials used in hospital, pharmacy & corporate locations -Formaldehyde -Triton X 100 -Fertilized chicken eggs -Phosphate buffers (bone-toxic) -Lab-grown hemagglutinin antigens from harmful host cells Post-marketing reports adverse events... - Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) - Anaphylaxis & angioedema -Encephalomyelitis -Bell's palsy -Convulsions -Optic neuropathy -Thrombocytopenia -Apnea -Brachial neuritis -Stevens Johnson Syndrome Have you ever gotten a flu shot? Did it harm your health? Share your experience below...

Valerie Anne Smith

16,571 views • 5 months ago

RFK Jr. says he wouldn’t take the flu shot “in a million years.” Why? Because people who get the flu shot are “4.4 times more likely to get a non-flu infection.” Kennedy cited a jaw-dropping Pentagon study by Wolfe, which revealed that those vaccinated against the flu were “36% more likely to get coronavirus.” “That’s the head of the HHS saying that. He's saying that about the flu shot. He wouldn’t take it in a million years.” Jimmy Dore

RFK Jr. says he wouldn’t take the flu shot “in a million years.” Why? Because people who get the flu shot are “4.4 times more likely to get a non-flu infection.” Kennedy cited a jaw-dropping Pentagon study by Wolfe, which revealed that those vaccinated against the flu were “36% more likely to get coronavirus.” “That’s the head of the HHS saying that. He's saying that about the flu shot. He wouldn’t take it in a million years.” Jimmy Dore

Vigilant Fox 🦊

180,755 views • 1 year ago