Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

The Founding Fathers deliberately designed the Senate so that senators would be chosen by state legislatures—giving the states a direct, institutional voice in Washington. The 17th Amendment silenced that voice and shattered the balance of federalism. Repeal it. Give the states their voice back.

109,953 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

35 Kommentare

Profilbild von Matt
Mattvor 2 Monaten

What should happen is states(the people) should be allowed to recall senators, so when ass holes like John Thune don’t do their jobs they can be replaced without having to wait years for an election.

Profilbild von Son Of Adam⭐️⭐️⭐️
Son Of Adam⭐️⭐️⭐️vor 2 Monaten

💯 The Senate was meant to be the brakes on possible bad legislation. Now it is a glorified Congress. Senators never had to run traditional campaigns. They were to be a chosen delegate for the state. Now outside money can fund a state’s senator. Also end the 16th End The FED

Profilbild von Magnolia
Magnoliavor 2 Monaten

@FreedomCaucusF My state legislature is a bunch of self serving corrupt arrogant condescending idiots. There’s no way we’ll be better off with them picking the senators. Sorry but that is worse than what we have now.

Profilbild von Walter22
Walter22vor 2 Monaten

With all due respect, sir - are you asking the voters to push for repeal of a Constitutional amendment (the 17th), when the current senate won't even pass the SAVE Act which the voters overwhelming support? State legislatures are as corruptly influenced by lobbyists as DC.

Profilbild von Allen Johnson
Allen Johnsonvor 2 Monaten

I sure as hell don’t trust the Texas Legislature to select my senator…they are worse than the Senate Republicans and side with Dems more than their own party!

Profilbild von Magnolia
Magnoliavor 2 Monaten

@FreedomCaucusF Instead of this, just put term limits in place. That has a much better chance of improving things.

Profilbild von Simpleton
Simpletonvor 2 Monaten

Are you being serious? Do you truly believe that citizens should give up our right to choose the politicians that we want and give it to people like yourself? Why do you want to take power away from voters? That's absurd.

Profilbild von Gary P. Nabhan
Gary P. Nabhanvor 2 Monaten

State legislatures are completely crooked. They’re owned by special interests and would make the Senate worse, not better.

Profilbild von Conservative Libertarian
Conservative Libertarianvor 2 Monaten

Absolutely killed our Checks and Balances. Thanks Woodrow Wilson. We need it back.

Profilbild von VaConservative
VaConservativevor 2 Monaten

Agreed. The absolute worst amendment to the constitution. The 17th destroyed any semblance of representation.

Profilbild von Tom Morgan
Tom Morganvor 2 Monaten

Sidebar... the United States federal government is the sole source of every single societal ill in this country without any exceptions whatsoever. It feeds on the bleeding heart brainwashed indentured slaves who've been convinced all is well.

Profilbild von NON NOBIS DOMINE
NON NOBIS DOMINEvor 2 Monaten

The 17th Amendment is an abomination that corrupts the intent of the Founding Fathers.

Profilbild von Twilight
Twilightvor 2 Monaten

The States lost an important "checks and balances" on the Federal government with the 17th amendment. Wilson was a progressive socialist determined to undermine the Constitutional Republic with the Federal Reserve Globalist Banker Act, the IRS and 17th Amendment

Profilbild von neuralamp
neuralampvor 2 Monaten

"The Founding Fathers deliberately designed the Senate so that senators would be chosen by state legislatures..." So the local politicians, not the people, will be electing their own representatives to the U.S. Senate. Did I get that right?

Profilbild von Mike Shurance
Mike Shurancevor 2 Monaten

So very few understand this historical concept and why it is so important. The people are represented by the house, the states were mesnt to be represented by the states!

Profilbild von Chris & Beth
Chris & Bethvor 2 Monaten

Exactly. Example: no state government would vote unfunded mandates on itself. We essentially have two houses of representatives.

Profilbild von Victory or Death
Victory or Deathvor 2 Monaten

Further Support - This is 100% accurate. The election of Senators by the state legislatures was intended to give states a say in the federal government, and specifically in the chamber where their delegated sovereignty was carried out. Read our book “In the Name of Democracy - The Rise and Fall of the American Republic” to learn the arguments surrounding the passage of the 17th Amendment, the controversy of its passage, and comparison of before and after in national stats.

Profilbild von The Alan Sanders Show 🇺🇸⚓️🐕
The Alan Sanders Show 🇺🇸⚓️🐕vor 2 Monaten

I have wanted the 17th repealed for YEARS!

Profilbild von RJZafft
RJZafftvor 2 Monaten

At some point of seniority, Congressmen and Senators cease representing their districts/states in Washington and start representing Washington in their districts and states.

Profilbild von Susan
Susanvor 2 Monaten

@freedomcaucus Another thing to study/examine is whether the Amendments were written and enactly according to text, history and tradition of founding documents, Constitution.

Profilbild von BC v.1
BC v.1vor 2 Monaten

Put another way, you want Senators to be chosen by political elites, not the people. The 17th exists because ~130yrs later, corruption and accountability were out of control. Repealing it now, at a time when corruption is the new norm, is beyond reckless - your MO. #TX03

Profilbild von Joe Barnhart
Joe Barnhartvor 2 Monaten

And it was only ONE of the disasterous changes in 1913. Two more were the Federal Reserve system and the income tax. 1913 is where the country was set on its path of desstruction.

Profilbild von Aygur
Aygurvor 2 Monaten

An argument for those who don't understand the wisdom of this: who is easier to replace with a grassroots campaign, your federal senator or your local state representative? If a critical mass of your state is angry at your federal senator, it's far easier to elect local representatives who solely run on replacing the senator and actually doing it.

Profilbild von JT-CLE
JT-CLEvor 2 Monaten

The 17th Amendment eliminated the States’ check on Federal power. Look at a graph of Federal government spending and it shows the extreme growth in the Federal budget. For a bonus look at how much power the Feds gave themselves.

Profilbild von Gregory Williams
Gregory Williamsvor 2 Monaten

It also acted as term limits for the Senators, unlikely on e would survive a change in the State government

Profilbild von Bob the Builder
Bob the Buildervor 2 Monaten

So what I’m hearing is you want to further silence the voice of the people.

Profilbild von Lance A Schart 🏳️‍🌈🇺🇦🇦🇱🦩🇵🇸🇬🇪🇹🇼
Lance A Schart 🏳️‍🌈🇺🇦🇦🇱🦩🇵🇸🇬🇪🇹🇼vor 2 Monaten

The jokes write themselves around Texas MAGA Mouthpiece @RepKeithSelf!

Profilbild von Rallenac
Rallenacvor 2 Monaten

Yes. All the 17th did was create a Senate easy to bribe. It did not increase our representation in the Senate at all, and made the states mere provinces of larger government.

Profilbild von edmcclung
edmcclungvor 2 Monaten

The 17th Amendment Created Senators Who Answer to Everyone but Their States

Profilbild von Greg Alford 🇺🇸 🇮🇱🇺🇦🌻
Greg Alford 🇺🇸 🇮🇱🇺🇦🌻vor 2 Monaten

1,000% Correct... Brake the back of the political uni-party's CONSOLIDATION OF POWER IN WASHINGTON DC... Restore the REPUBLIC... Repeal the 17th Amendment!!!

Profilbild von BDSkinner
BDSkinnervor 2 Monaten

💯!!! Senators no longer give a sh*t about their states or constituents; it’s about their donors. Roughly 80% to 90% of U.S. Senators who choose to run for another term win reelection. Once they have the money, the power, name recognition, and membership in the circle-jerk club that fights to protect them, they’re nearly impossible to defeat. Have you put forth the resolution proposing the amendment?

Profilbild von BDSkinner
BDSkinnervor 2 Monaten

People are missing the point. You vote for your state representatives, who then have the power to send your senator to Washington. It puts the power back in the hands of the people closer to home. Yes, I get it—I’m in Texas, and our state legislature is suspect at best—but let’s be honest, they’ve become an afterthought. We put much more time, effort, and money into senators who are much more susceptible to outside influence then give them free reign for six years.

Profilbild von 0llie Gorky 🇺🇸
0llie Gorky 🇺🇸vor 2 Monaten

Repeal the 17th amendment and let the states legislatures choose senators. Modify the 22nd amendment and allow more than 2 presidential terms.

Profilbild von Thomas Valentino
Thomas Valentinovor 2 Monaten

Amen!

Profilbild von Stan Man
Stan Manvor 2 Monaten

None of this matters, you crooks would’ve figured out a way to corrupt anything like you have. You’ve had enough time to corrupt the whole goddamn world. What a bunch of scum sucking shit bags.

Ähnliche Videos

All 100 U.S. Senators have approved the Epstein bill through unanimous consent. As CNN’s Manu Raju explained, this wasn’t a normal vote. It was a procedural green light, eliminating delays and skipping a formal roll-call entirely. Raju broke down in detail what comes next: “But now it is on its way to the president’s desk in a remarkable turnaround, in an extremely fast move here, the senate has essentially greenlighted this bill to be approved as soon as tonight and be sent to the president’s desk.” “Now, essentially, what happened was that in the aftermath of this house vote this afternoon, 427 to 1, just one member of the entire United States house voting against it, this is now on its way to the Senate.” “Now, there has not been a formal process that would be formally sent over to the United States Senate. That process would take some time to get through the official writing of…getting the bill over across the capitol.” “It’s an arcane process, but once it gets over to the United States Senate, that’s when the bill can be read in the senate and officially essentially passed.” “So what we just saw moments ago was Chuck Schumer, the Senate Democratic leader, he went to the floor of the United States Senate, and he said…he asked for what’s known in the Senate as unanimous consent.” “That means that all 100 Senators have to agree, or one Senator could object and slow things down. He asked unanimous consent that for when the Senate receives the final paperwork of the bill that just passed the United States House, that it would be approved by the United States Senate.” “Nobody objected to that, Jake. So what that means is that as soon as it formally transmitted, this bill is formally transmitted from the House to the Senate, the Senate will essentially have it approved.” “It will be approved in their chamber. There does not need to be a roll call vote, and then it will go to the president’s desk for his signature, in which the president has indicated that he will sign.”

Overton

291,904 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten