Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

The future encounter between Mark Grayson and Immortal is a quiet but deeply unsettling moment. Mark travels into the future with one goal—to kill Immortal and stop a dark timeline from continuing—but what he finds is far from the powerful leader he once knew. The world around them feels...

19,955 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Andrei Tarkovsky on Ingmar Bergman's Shame (1968): "Let us look at Bergman's Shame. The film doesn't contain a single 'actor's piece' for the performer to 'give away' the director's purpose, to play the conception of the persona, his attitude to it, to assess it in relation to the overall idea; and the latter is entirely hidden within the dynamic of the characters' lives, at one with it. The people in the film are crushed by circumstances; they act only in accordance with their situation, to which they themselves are subordinate; they make no attempt to proffer us any idea, any perspective on what is happening, or to draw any conclusion. All of that is left to the film as a whole, to the director's vision. And how superbly it is accomplished! You cannot say in simple terms who amongst them is good or bad. I could never say that von Sydow is a bad man. They are all partly good and partly bad, each in his own way. No judgements are passed, because there is no hint of tendentiousness in any of the actors, and the circumstances of the film are used by the director to explore the human possibilities which they test, and not for a moment in order to illustrate a thesis. Max von Sydow's character is developed with masterly power. He is a very good man; a musician; kind and sensitive. It turns out that he is a coward. But by no means every bold man is a good human being, and cowards are not always scoundrels. Of course, he is weak and irresolute. His wife is far stronger than he, so much so that she can overcome her fear. The hero lacks that strength. He is tormented by his own weakness, vulnerability, lack of resilience; he tries to hide, to cower in a corner, not to see and not to hear; and he does this like a child, naively and with complete sincerity. But when circumstances nevertheless force him to defend himself, he instantly turns into a scoundrel. He loses all that was best in him; but the drama and absurdity of his situation is that as he is now he becomes necessary to his wife, who, in her turn, looks to him for protection and succour instead of despising him as she always had. When he beats her about the face and says 'Get out!' she goes crawling after him. There is something here of the age-old idea of passive good and active evil; but its expression is immensely complex. At the beginning of the film the hero cannot even kill a chicken, but as soon as he has found a way of defending himself he becomes a cruel cynic. He has something of Hamlet: my view is that the Prince of Denmark perishes not as a result of the duel, when he dies physically, but immediately after the 'rat' scene, when he understands how irreversible are those laws of life which have forced him, a man of humanity and intellect, to act like the inferior people who inhabit Elsinore. Von Sydow is now a sinister character, afraid of nothing: he kills; will not raise a finger to save his fellows; pursues only his own interests. The point is that you have to be a person of great integrity to feel fear in the face of the foul necessity to kill and humiliate. And by shedding that fear and apparently acquiring courage, a person in fact loses his spiritual strength and intellectual honesty and parts from his innocence. War is the obvious catalyst for the cruel, anti-human elements in people. Bergman uses the war in this film exactly as he uses the heroine's illness in Through a Glass Darkly: to explore his view of man." — "Sculpting in Time" by Andrei Tarkovsky (translated by Kitty Hunter-Blair, 1987)

RadiantFilm

27,723 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

One of the most memorable moments in The Scarlet Pimpernel (1982) is not a dazzling sword fight or a daring rescue, but the scene near the end of the film when Sir Percy Blakeney no longer has any need to maintain the façade of a foolish aristocrat. After spending the entire story appearing frivolous, preoccupied only with fashionable clothes, light verse, and the pleasures of high society, he finally stands revealed as the man he truly is: composed, resolute, and quietly heroic. The power of this scene does not lie in Percy revealing his abilities. It lies in the meaning of what he has chosen to conceal. From the beginning of the film, the audience already knows that Percy is the Scarlet Pimpernel. Each time he speaks absurdly, behaves with theatrical affectation, or allows himself to become the object of ridicule, viewers understand that this is not his true character. The mystery the film gradually unfolds is not who Percy is, but why he has willingly lived behind such a mask for so long. Percy does not pretend to be a fool because he lacks courage. He pretends to be one because it is the surest way to save lives. If the world believes him to be nothing more than a vain and idle nobleman, no one will suspect him of possessing the resolve and intelligence required to lead a secret network rescuing innocent men and women from the guillotine during the French Revolution. The contempt of others becomes the very shield that protects every mission he undertakes. Every insult Percy quietly accepts helps preserve another human life. It is here that Percy begins to differ from many familiar portrayals of heroism. Ordinarily, when people are misunderstood, they seek to explain themselves. When they are underestimated, they feel compelled to prove their worth. Honour and recognition seem almost instinctive human desires. Percy chooses the opposite path. He knows who he is, and therefore has no need for others to confirm it. He knows what is right, and therefore has no need for others to applaud it. What he chooses to protect is not his own reputation, but the lives of those waiting to be rescued. For this reason, when the mask is finally laid aside at the end of the film, the audience's admiration arises from far more than the discovery that Percy is brave, intelligent, and resourceful. What commands their respect is the full measure of the sacrifice he has quietly embraced all along. The greatest trial is not crossing swords with one's enemies, but enduring misunderstanding while continuing, without complaint, to do what is right. This is precisely why Percy so clearly embodies the traditional ideal of the hero. Within that tradition, heroism is defined not first by glorious deeds, but by virtue. Strength, intellect, and courage are all admirable qualities, yet they attain their highest worth only when governed by moral goodness. The true hero does not act in order to be celebrated. He acts because what is right must be done. Reputation, if it comes at all, is merely the consequence, never the purpose. At a deeper level, the scene touches upon a fundamental principle of human dignity. A person is truly free only when his worth no longer depends upon the judgement of others. So long as one requires praise in order to persevere in goodness, or recognition in order to justify one's actions, one's conduct remains, to some degree, governed by the ego. But when someone is willing to sacrifice even his own reputation in order to defend what is right, he places a higher value above personal self-interest. Percy is the embodiment of that freedom. Seen in this light, the deepest power of the scene lies not merely in the removal of a disguise. What the film ultimately reveals is a profoundly classical ideal of heroism: a person achieves true nobility not when admired by the world, but when remaining faithful to goodness even when no one knows who he truly is. Virtue does not require public display in order to be virtue, nor does duty require applause in order to remain duty. It is for this reason that Sir Percy Blakeney is more than the man who rescues innocent victims from the machinery of terror unleashed during the French Revolution. He becomes the embodiment of the heroic ideal cherished within the classical tradition: one who is prepared to sacrifice even his own good name in defence of what is just. Perhaps this is why Sir Percy Blakeney has endured as such a compelling figure, continuing to be admired by successive generations as one of the finest representations of the classical hero.

𝗖𝗹𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗠𝗲𝗹𝗼𝗱𝗶𝗲𝘀

28,441 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen