Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

The Gibka-S self-propelled very short-range air defense system, based on a modified Tigr 4×4 armored vehicle, was seen conducting live-fire exercises, with drones serving as the primary targets. The system uses roof-mounted launchers capable of firing Igla-S or 9K333 Verba MANPADS, using the 9M336, 9M342, or 9M39 surface-to-air missiles....

OSINTWarfare's profile picture

OSINTWarfare

123,179 subscribers

12,341 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨🇮🇳🇷🇺BIG: Russia has offered to supply India with the Pantsir-S1M air defence system to protect its S-400 Triumf batteries, a Russian defence industry source told Sputnik. The Pantsir is a mobile short-range system equipped with both missiles and guns, designed to shield high-value assets such as the long-range S-400 from drones and missiles.
3:01

🚨🇮🇳🇷🇺BIG: Russia has offered to supply India with the Pantsir-S1M air defence system to protect its S-400 Triumf batteries, a Russian defence industry source told Sputnik. The Pantsir is a mobile short-range system equipped with both missiles and guns, designed to shield high-value assets such as the long-range S-400 from drones and missiles.

Sputnik India

191,605 views • 6 months ago

Personnel of the Armenian Armed Forces' Air Defence Troops conducted training exercises using the recently acquired “Karich,” the Iranian Majid (AD-08) short-range air defense system, and “Lusan,” India's Akash surface-to-air missile system.
4:17

Personnel of the Armenian Armed Forces' Air Defence Troops conducted training exercises using the recently acquired “Karich,” the Iranian Majid (AD-08) short-range air defense system, and “Lusan,” India's Akash surface-to-air missile system.

OSINTWarfare

45,040 views • 2 months ago

The @1uas_army destroyed Russia’s Imbir radar and S-300V air defence system near Mariupol on the night of March 1 using FP-2 guided strike drones with 100kg warhead. Imbir is a rare mobile radar used within the S-300V air defense system. The S-300V 9A84 launcher is a high-value air defense component with an engagement range of up to 250 km.
0:51

The @1uas_army destroyed Russia’s Imbir radar and S-300V air defence system near Mariupol on the night of March 1 using FP-2 guided strike drones with 100kg warhead. Imbir is a rare mobile radar used within the S-300V air defense system. The S-300V 9A84 launcher is a high-value air defense component with an engagement range of up to 250 km.

Special Kherson Cat 🐈🇺🇦

159,498 views • 7 months ago

Fast and furious: Russia’s wheeled Malva howitzer packs 152mm punch at lightning speed The 152mm Malva wheeled self-propelled howitzer is a comprehensive system designed for rapid strikes, high mobility and drone-integrated targeting. 🔸 The Malva can deploy, receive targeting data, and vacate its firing position within minutes—drastically reducing its vulnerability to counter-battery fire 🔸 Reconnaissance UAVs can transmit target coordinates over protected channels directly to the howitzer’s digital fire-control system 🔸 The 152mm howitzer possesses a firing range of over 24 km and carries up to 30 rounds 🔸 Mounted on a BAZ-6910 wheeled chassis, the Malva is lighter and more agile than tracked alternatives, facilitating swift repositioning, long-distance road travel, and air transportability The system is designed to strike a wide range of targets, among them command posts, fortified positions, artillery and missile batteries, air-defense assets, and armored columns. As counter-battery warfare grows ever more reliant on drones, mobility, and split-second reaction times, the Malva's key advantage lies in its ability to rapidly receive targeting data, deliver fire, and relocate—all before the enemy can respond.
0:40

Fast and furious: Russia’s wheeled Malva howitzer packs 152mm punch at lightning speed The 152mm Malva wheeled self-propelled howitzer is a comprehensive system designed for rapid strikes, high mobility and drone-integrated targeting. 🔸 The Malva can deploy, receive targeting data, and vacate its firing position within minutes—drastically reducing its vulnerability to counter-battery fire 🔸 Reconnaissance UAVs can transmit target coordinates over protected channels directly to the howitzer’s digital fire-control system 🔸 The 152mm howitzer possesses a firing range of over 24 km and carries up to 30 rounds 🔸 Mounted on a BAZ-6910 wheeled chassis, the Malva is lighter and more agile than tracked alternatives, facilitating swift repositioning, long-distance road travel, and air transportability The system is designed to strike a wide range of targets, among them command posts, fortified positions, artillery and missile batteries, air-defense assets, and armored columns. As counter-battery warfare grows ever more reliant on drones, mobility, and split-second reaction times, the Malva's key advantage lies in its ability to rapidly receive targeting data, deliver fire, and relocate—all before the enemy can respond.

Sputnik

15,732 views • 1 month ago

🇺🇸🇷🇺 THAAD vs S-400: TWO VERY DIFFERENT AIR DEFENSE PHILOSOPHIES THAAD and Russia’s S-400 are often compared as if they perform the same mission. Technically, that is misleading. THAAD is primarily a dedicated ballistic missile defense system. Its interceptor uses hit to kill technology, meaning it destroys the incoming warhead through direct kinetic impact rather than relying on a conventional explosive warhead. It is designed to engage ballistic missiles during their terminal phase, including both inside and just outside the atmosphere. Its AN/TPY-2 X band radar provides high resolution tracking and target discrimination, allowing the system to distinguish the actual reentry vehicle from other objects and continuously update the interceptor with precise tracking data. S-400 follows a different philosophy. It is a multi role long range air defense architecture designed to engage aircraft, cruise missiles and selected ballistic missile threats using different interceptor missiles. Its strength is not simply the advertised maximum range, but the combination of multiple radars, command and control, mobile launchers and different missile types. This creates a major technical distinction: THAAD = specialized upper tier ballistic missile defense S-400 = broader long range integrated air defense THAAD's interceptor is optimized for the difficult terminal ballistic missile problem, where the target may be travelling at extremely high velocity and descending rapidly toward the defended area. S-400's architecture is optimized for flexibility, allowing commanders to select different interceptors depending on target type, altitude and engagement geometry. The real question therefore isn't "Which system has the longer range?" It is: Which system is better suited to the threat? Against ballistic missile warheads, THAAD's architecture is specifically optimized for the mission. Against a mixed package of aircraft, cruise missiles and other aerial targets, S-400 offers a much broader engagement envelope. And in a modern war, neither system is supposed to operate alone. The real advantage comes from layered defense, where long range sensors, command networks, THAAD, Patriot or other systems work together. Range is only one number. Radar architecture, target discrimination, interceptor kinematics, engagement altitude, reaction time, saturation capacity and network integration ultimately determine whether an air defense system survives a real missile raid.
6:31

🇺🇸🇷🇺 THAAD vs S-400: TWO VERY DIFFERENT AIR DEFENSE PHILOSOPHIES THAAD and Russia’s S-400 are often compared as if they perform the same mission. Technically, that is misleading. THAAD is primarily a dedicated ballistic missile defense system. Its interceptor uses hit to kill technology, meaning it destroys the incoming warhead through direct kinetic impact rather than relying on a conventional explosive warhead. It is designed to engage ballistic missiles during their terminal phase, including both inside and just outside the atmosphere. Its AN/TPY-2 X band radar provides high resolution tracking and target discrimination, allowing the system to distinguish the actual reentry vehicle from other objects and continuously update the interceptor with precise tracking data. S-400 follows a different philosophy. It is a multi role long range air defense architecture designed to engage aircraft, cruise missiles and selected ballistic missile threats using different interceptor missiles. Its strength is not simply the advertised maximum range, but the combination of multiple radars, command and control, mobile launchers and different missile types. This creates a major technical distinction: THAAD = specialized upper tier ballistic missile defense S-400 = broader long range integrated air defense THAAD's interceptor is optimized for the difficult terminal ballistic missile problem, where the target may be travelling at extremely high velocity and descending rapidly toward the defended area. S-400's architecture is optimized for flexibility, allowing commanders to select different interceptors depending on target type, altitude and engagement geometry. The real question therefore isn't "Which system has the longer range?" It is: Which system is better suited to the threat? Against ballistic missile warheads, THAAD's architecture is specifically optimized for the mission. Against a mixed package of aircraft, cruise missiles and other aerial targets, S-400 offers a much broader engagement envelope. And in a modern war, neither system is supposed to operate alone. The real advantage comes from layered defense, where long range sensors, command networks, THAAD, Patriot or other systems work together. Range is only one number. Radar architecture, target discrimination, interceptor kinematics, engagement altitude, reaction time, saturation capacity and network integration ultimately determine whether an air defense system survives a real missile raid.

Defense Intelligence

12,393 views • 2 months ago

Maiden flight Tests of Integrated Air Defence Weapon System (IADWS) was successfully conducted on 23 Aug 2025 at around 1230 Hrs off the coast of Odisha. IADWS is a multi-layered air defence system comprising of all indigenous Quick Reaction Surface to Air Missile (QRSAM), Advanced Very Short Range Air Defence System (VSHORADS) missiles and a high power laser based Directed Energy Weapon(DEW).
0:24

Maiden flight Tests of Integrated Air Defence Weapon System (IADWS) was successfully conducted on 23 Aug 2025 at around 1230 Hrs off the coast of Odisha. IADWS is a multi-layered air defence system comprising of all indigenous Quick Reaction Surface to Air Missile (QRSAM), Advanced Very Short Range Air Defence System (VSHORADS) missiles and a high power laser based Directed Energy Weapon(DEW).

DRDO

245,033 views • 1 year ago

🚨 BIG! India’s fourth S-400 air defence squadron is set to arrive this week - Modi government has already cleared procurement of 5 additional S-400 units. India has also decided to acquire 280 short and long-range missiles for the system🔥🇮🇳
4:15

🚨 BIG! India’s fourth S-400 air defence squadron is set to arrive this week - Modi government has already cleared procurement of 5 additional S-400 units. India has also decided to acquire 280 short and long-range missiles for the system🔥🇮🇳

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

45,291 views • 4 months ago

Russian report: Gulf air defenses face a “million-dollar missile vs. a drone costing a few thousand dollars” dilemma The Russian Center for Analysis of World Arms Trade published a study and analysis concluding that Gulf states’ reliance on long-range U.S. air defense systems against low-cost threats such as attack drones creates a significant gap between the cost of the attack and the cost of interception. The center noted that an Iranian Shahed-136 drone is estimated to cost around $20,000–$50,000 , while a PAC-3 interceptor missile can cost approximately $4 million , making the interception of large-scale drone attacks extremely expensive. The report argues that systems such as Patriot and THAAD were largely designed to counter long-range threats and ballistic missiles, while Gulf states need diversified defensive layers, including short- and medium-range systems to counter drones, cruise missiles, and low-altitude targets. The center proposed strengthening air defenses with Russian systems such as Buk-M3 “Viking” for medium-range defense, Tor for short-range defense, and Pantsir-S1M to protect critical infrastructure from close-range threats. According to the report, combining long-, medium-, and short-range systems could increase the number of engagement channels and reduce the depletion of costly interceptor missiles, particularly around oil refineries, desalination plants, ports, and energy facilities. The Russian center concludes that addressing the cost gap between offensive weapons and interceptors could make large-scale drone attacks less economically viable by building a layered defense system capable of countering threats at a more balanced cost.
0:22

Russian report: Gulf air defenses face a “million-dollar missile vs. a drone costing a few thousand dollars” dilemma The Russian Center for Analysis of World Arms Trade published a study and analysis concluding that Gulf states’ reliance on long-range U.S. air defense systems against low-cost threats such as attack drones creates a significant gap between the cost of the attack and the cost of interception. The center noted that an Iranian Shahed-136 drone is estimated to cost around $20,000–$50,000 , while a PAC-3 interceptor missile can cost approximately $4 million , making the interception of large-scale drone attacks extremely expensive. The report argues that systems such as Patriot and THAAD were largely designed to counter long-range threats and ballistic missiles, while Gulf states need diversified defensive layers, including short- and medium-range systems to counter drones, cruise missiles, and low-altitude targets. The center proposed strengthening air defenses with Russian systems such as Buk-M3 “Viking” for medium-range defense, Tor for short-range defense, and Pantsir-S1M to protect critical infrastructure from close-range threats. According to the report, combining long-, medium-, and short-range systems could increase the number of engagement channels and reduce the depletion of costly interceptor missiles, particularly around oil refineries, desalination plants, ports, and energy facilities. The Russian center concludes that addressing the cost gap between offensive weapons and interceptors could make large-scale drone attacks less economically viable by building a layered defense system capable of countering threats at a more balanced cost.

RussiaNews 🇷🇺

13,364 views • 1 month ago

UPDATE: Ukrainian intelligence used naval drone to launch a smaller attack drone, which then took out one of Russia’s S400 defense system. 🇺🇦🇷🇺 The S-400 is one of Russia’s most prized air defense systems, built to shoot down aircraft, drones, and missiles at long range. The cost gap is staggering. A single S-400 launcher and its support systems can cost billions of dollars. The drones used to destroy it likely cost only in thousands. What is genuinely new is the method. Ukraine used a naval drone, built for sea warfare, as a launch platform to carry smaller FPV drones against land targets.
2:16

UPDATE: Ukrainian intelligence used naval drone to launch a smaller attack drone, which then took out one of Russia’s S400 defense system. 🇺🇦🇷🇺 The S-400 is one of Russia’s most prized air defense systems, built to shoot down aircraft, drones, and missiles at long range. The cost gap is staggering. A single S-400 launcher and its support systems can cost billions of dollars. The drones used to destroy it likely cost only in thousands. What is genuinely new is the method. Ukraine used a naval drone, built for sea warfare, as a launch platform to carry smaller FPV drones against land targets.

Donald J Trump Posts TruthSocial

49,652 views • 2 months ago

Indian Army seeks major purchase of 1,000 local-built QRSAM missiles The mobile quick reaction surface-to-air missile (QRSAM) system is designed to protect mechanized and armored units from fighter jets, helicopters, drones and other low-to-medium altitude threats. Unlike traditional, stationary air-defense batteries, this highly mobile weapon system with a range of about 30 km and the ability to engage targets at altitudes of up to 10 km, allows units to keep pace with advancing forces. The deal is worth $1.2 billion, Indian media report. The planned acquisition would further expand India’s domestic missile production while giving the army a highly mobile layer of air defense between long-range systems and shorter-range defenses.
0:20

Indian Army seeks major purchase of 1,000 local-built QRSAM missiles The mobile quick reaction surface-to-air missile (QRSAM) system is designed to protect mechanized and armored units from fighter jets, helicopters, drones and other low-to-medium altitude threats. Unlike traditional, stationary air-defense batteries, this highly mobile weapon system with a range of about 30 km and the ability to engage targets at altitudes of up to 10 km, allows units to keep pace with advancing forces. The deal is worth $1.2 billion, Indian media report. The planned acquisition would further expand India’s domestic missile production while giving the army a highly mobile layer of air defense between long-range systems and shorter-range defenses.

Sputnik

12,269 views • 1 month ago

💥 Operators of the Unmanned Systems Forces struck an Osa surface-to-air missile system on the Donetsk axis Pilots of the 412th Nemesis Brigade delivered a precise strike on an enemy mobile air defense system used to cover russian units and critical assets from aircraft, cruise missiles, and UAV strikes. The Osa SAM system is a short-range mobile air defense complex equipped with six missiles, capable of engaging aerial targets at distances of up to 10 km and altitudes of up to 5 km. It is one of the most widely used air defense systems operated by russian forces. The Unmanned Systems Forces continue to systematically degrade the enemy’s air defense capabilities, opening the airspace for further operations by Ukraine’s Defense Forces. USF: One step ahead!
0:24

💥 Operators of the Unmanned Systems Forces struck an Osa surface-to-air missile system on the Donetsk axis Pilots of the 412th Nemesis Brigade delivered a precise strike on an enemy mobile air defense system used to cover russian units and critical assets from aircraft, cruise missiles, and UAV strikes. The Osa SAM system is a short-range mobile air defense complex equipped with six missiles, capable of engaging aerial targets at distances of up to 10 km and altitudes of up to 5 km. It is one of the most widely used air defense systems operated by russian forces. The Unmanned Systems Forces continue to systematically degrade the enemy’s air defense capabilities, opening the airspace for further operations by Ukraine’s Defense Forces. USF: One step ahead!

🇺🇦 Unmanned Systems Forces

11,577 views • 7 months ago

As part of "upgrading readiness for future threats," the Defense Ministry says it successfully completed a series of "complex" tests with the David's Sling medium-range air defense system. David's Sling, produced by defense firm Rafael, is designed to intercept rockets, missiles, cruise missiles, aircraft, and UAVs. The ministry says the series of tests was based on "operational lessons" learned from the war, and included a "range of challenging scenarios in line with existing and evolving threats." "The success of the tests constitutes an additional technological and operational breakthrough in upgrading the system, which demonstrated high performance capabilities during the war with successful interceptions that saved lives and prevented significant damage," it says. David’s Sling, operational since 2017, forms the middle tier of Israel’s multi-layer air defense capabilities, which also include the short-range Iron Beam and Iron Dome, and a top-tier of Arrow systems, the latter of which are intended to engage long-range ballistic missiles.
1:13

As part of "upgrading readiness for future threats," the Defense Ministry says it successfully completed a series of "complex" tests with the David's Sling medium-range air defense system. David's Sling, produced by defense firm Rafael, is designed to intercept rockets, missiles, cruise missiles, aircraft, and UAVs. The ministry says the series of tests was based on "operational lessons" learned from the war, and included a "range of challenging scenarios in line with existing and evolving threats." "The success of the tests constitutes an additional technological and operational breakthrough in upgrading the system, which demonstrated high performance capabilities during the war with successful interceptions that saved lives and prevented significant damage," it says. David’s Sling, operational since 2017, forms the middle tier of Israel’s multi-layer air defense capabilities, which also include the short-range Iron Beam and Iron Dome, and a top-tier of Arrow systems, the latter of which are intended to engage long-range ballistic missiles.

Emanuel (Mannie) Fabian

19,956 views • 8 months ago

On the night of February 25, the Special Operations Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine struck Russian air defense positions in occupied Crimea. A launcher of the S-400 Triumf surface-to-air missile system, a 92N6E radar station, and other components of the complex were hit. A Pantsir-S1 air defense missile and gun system, which had been protecting key facilities and air defense positions from drones and missiles, was also destroyed.
0:27

On the night of February 25, the Special Operations Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine struck Russian air defense positions in occupied Crimea. A launcher of the S-400 Triumf surface-to-air missile system, a 92N6E radar station, and other components of the complex were hit. A Pantsir-S1 air defense missile and gun system, which had been protecting key facilities and air defense positions from drones and missiles, was also destroyed.

WarTranslated

20,865 views • 7 months ago

❗️ 🇱🇹 Lithuania has signed a €320 million agreement with SAAB to acquire RBS-70 Bolide systems, significantly reinforcing its short-range air defense. Deliveries are scheduled for 2026–2032, with the missiles mounted on JLTV platforms to enhance mobility and frontline protection. The system can engage aerial targets at ranges of up to 9 km, strengthening Lithuania’s resilience against modern air threats amid rising regional tensions. See the latest updates with us: NSTRIKE
0:27

❗️ 🇱🇹 Lithuania has signed a €320 million agreement with SAAB to acquire RBS-70 Bolide systems, significantly reinforcing its short-range air defense. Deliveries are scheduled for 2026–2032, with the missiles mounted on JLTV platforms to enhance mobility and frontline protection. The system can engage aerial targets at ranges of up to 9 km, strengthening Lithuania’s resilience against modern air threats amid rising regional tensions. See the latest updates with us: NSTRIKE

NSTRIKE

23,333 views • 9 months ago