Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

The graph they built on a lie. The iconic 'climate' graph that's undermining industrial capitalism and taking our freedom...and it's 100 percent garbage. Watch this film, and learn the shocking truth with Tom Nelson

19,918 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

mjordan's profile picture
mjordan1 year ago

@BigJoeBastardi @TomANelson Excellent. You didn’t get to it (though you noted it’s coming) but that ocean data is corrupt as well thanks to allowing water taken in by ships — always warmed in the process — to be part of the temperature record. Looking forward to that video. Keep up the great work.

AP Williams 🇿🇦's profile picture
AP Williams 🇿🇦1 year ago

@TomANelson Poor data handling is the most polite way one can describe it. It's a racket. @ClimateZA @GwedeMantashe1 @Our_DA.

Go CO₂↑!'s profile picture
Go CO₂↑!1 year ago

@TomANelson Excellent piece well done. I believe there is also statistical manipulation in this infamous graph in addition to the poor correction of the underlying data?

Tito G. 🇨🇱 🇺🇸's profile picture
Tito G. 🇨🇱 🇺🇸1 year ago

@TomANelson This is great.. thanks for driving awareness to all the climate change scams Keep it up

Jamie Miller's profile picture
Jamie Miller1 year ago

@TomANelson ‘Poor data handling’!?!? Oh please. That’s like calling arson ‘overenthusiastic heating.’ Let’s call it what it is: data corruption. Or, if we’re feeling especially honest today, plain old data falsification.

Meh - we need to go net zero, but we won't.'s profile picture
Meh - we need to go net zero, but we won't.1 year ago

@Martin_Durkin @TomANelson TL/DR: this film is disinformation

hmefsww #UKCitizen2021's profile picture
hmefsww #UKCitizen20211 year ago

@TomANelson And the “consensus “ is a lie…

Uncle Knobhead's profile picture
Uncle Knobhead1 year ago

@TomANelson @bbcnickrobinson

Scott Simmons's profile picture
Scott Simmons1 year ago

@TomANelson 3/ Station siting also has a negligible impact on CONUS warming. This again has been documented. There's no evidence of spurious warming due to station siting or UHI.

Scott Simmons's profile picture
Scott Simmons1 year ago

@TomANelson 4/ Stations located at airports warm at the same rate as those at non airports.

Related Videos