Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

The Guardian claims ocean warming is causing a 'staggering' collapse in marine life, but the study it cites actually shows the opposite. When a year is warmer, fish biomass is found to increase - by as much as 24%. When years turn colder, biomass falls - by around 15%.... That is the observed data. To preserve the climate narrative, however, the authors then abandon real year-to-year results and switch to a modeled decadal trend. The model assigns warming a negative effect and reports a decline. That decline is not observed. It is modeled. The authors go on to admit they cannot separate temperature effects from overfishing, which is the primary, well-known driver of fish declines worldwide. Since fishing pressure is not included, the model loads losses onto temperature by default. Even though, as per the study's own data, warmer years mean more fish. The collapse exists only in the model. And the headlines.show more

Electroverse

36,382 subscribers

13,304 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika Bilim & Teknoloji

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

THE CORRELATION OF TEMPERATURE TO CO2 IS THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT WE ARE TOLD: TEMPERATURE CHANGE LEADS TO CO2 CHANGE, NOT VICEVERSA: CO2 lags earth temperature changes by 800 years, not the other way round. The CO2 causing Climate Change narrative is a hoax, climate change causes CO2 change instead, because it is emitted by the ocean, which acts as a temperature dependent carbon sink. SCIENTIFIC PROOF CO2 IS NOT THE CAUSE OF CLIMATE CHANGE Timing of Atmospheric CO2 and Antarctic Temperature Changes Across Termination III | Science "We have measured the isotopic composition of argon in air bubbles in the Vostok core during Termination III (∼240,000 years before the present). This record most likely reflects the temperature and accumulation change, although the mechanism remains unclear. The sequence of events during Termination III suggests that the CO2 increase lagged Antarctic deglacial warming by 800 ± 200 years and preceded the Northern Hemisphere deglaciation."

THE CORRELATION OF TEMPERATURE TO CO2 IS THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT WE ARE TOLD: TEMPERATURE CHANGE LEADS TO CO2 CHANGE, NOT VICEVERSA: CO2 lags earth temperature changes by 800 years, not the other way round. The CO2 causing Climate Change narrative is a hoax, climate change causes CO2 change instead, because it is emitted by the ocean, which acts as a temperature dependent carbon sink. SCIENTIFIC PROOF CO2 IS NOT THE CAUSE OF CLIMATE CHANGE Timing of Atmospheric CO2 and Antarctic Temperature Changes Across Termination III | Science "We have measured the isotopic composition of argon in air bubbles in the Vostok core during Termination III (∼240,000 years before the present). This record most likely reflects the temperature and accumulation change, although the mechanism remains unclear. The sequence of events during Termination III suggests that the CO2 increase lagged Antarctic deglacial warming by 800 ± 200 years and preceded the Northern Hemisphere deglaciation."

Robin Monotti

112,698 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

The global mean surface temperature today is only about 1C warmer than it was in 1880. This modest rise has been framed as a 'climate emergency,' yet in historical context it is trivial. Global temperatures have fluctuated by more than 10C over natural glacial cycles long before industrialization. Even during the Holocene, recent periods such as the Medieval Warm Period were far warmer than today without triggering catastrophe. The data show no runaway warming or planetary collapse. In fact, historical records reveal warmth is beneficial to humanity and to life in general. This disconnect between reality and the apocalyptic rhetoric exposes the ruse. There is no "climate crisis."

The global mean surface temperature today is only about 1C warmer than it was in 1880. This modest rise has been framed as a 'climate emergency,' yet in historical context it is trivial. Global temperatures have fluctuated by more than 10C over natural glacial cycles long before industrialization. Even during the Holocene, recent periods such as the Medieval Warm Period were far warmer than today without triggering catastrophe. The data show no runaway warming or planetary collapse. In fact, historical records reveal warmth is beneficial to humanity and to life in general. This disconnect between reality and the apocalyptic rhetoric exposes the ruse. There is no "climate crisis."

Electroverse

30,764 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce

THE TRUTH ABOUT CO2: CO2 lags earth temperature changes by ~800 years, not the other way round. The CO2 causing Climate Change narrative is a hoax, climate change causes CO2 change instead, because it is emitted by the ocean, which acts as a temperature dependent carbon sink.

THE TRUTH ABOUT CO2: CO2 lags earth temperature changes by ~800 years, not the other way round. The CO2 causing Climate Change narrative is a hoax, climate change causes CO2 change instead, because it is emitted by the ocean, which acts as a temperature dependent carbon sink.

illuminatibot

62,879 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

A peer-reviewed study finds that most of the temperature rise observed over the past century in the US isn't from greenhouse gases, but instead from roads, buildings and parking lots. By comparing raw US temperature data from stations in areas with different population densities, the study found that 65% of the warming since 1895 is explained by the urban heat island effect, and another 8% by urban growth into once-rural areas. That's nearly three quarters of the warming. No CO2 involved. Crucially, NOAA's adjusted data hides this effect. 'Homogenization' smooths it out, a process the study's author, Dr Roy Spencer, calls "urban blending". It's not global warming. It's urbanization.

A peer-reviewed study finds that most of the temperature rise observed over the past century in the US isn't from greenhouse gases, but instead from roads, buildings and parking lots. By comparing raw US temperature data from stations in areas with different population densities, the study found that 65% of the warming since 1895 is explained by the urban heat island effect, and another 8% by urban growth into once-rural areas. That's nearly three quarters of the warming. No CO2 involved. Crucially, NOAA's adjusted data hides this effect. 'Homogenization' smooths it out, a process the study's author, Dr Roy Spencer, calls "urban blending". It's not global warming. It's urbanization.

Electroverse

20,247 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Global warming? There is a clear global warming especially in the last 45 years, with 2023-2024 being the warmest years on satellite records. However, the current global temperature is not warm. It is only ~1.2°C higher than in 1850, one of the coldest years in the last 10,000 years. And the current climate is one of the coldest of the last 485 million years. Global warming is primarily driven by natural cycles. Humans are not the control factor. There is no man-made climate crisis. This is my usual compendium with automatic audio using a text-to-audio AI application. It still needs to improve, but it's already quite acceptable!

Global warming? There is a clear global warming especially in the last 45 years, with 2023-2024 being the warmest years on satellite records. However, the current global temperature is not warm. It is only ~1.2°C higher than in 1850, one of the coldest years in the last 10,000 years. And the current climate is one of the coldest of the last 485 million years. Global warming is primarily driven by natural cycles. Humans are not the control factor. There is no man-made climate crisis. This is my usual compendium with automatic audio using a text-to-audio AI application. It still needs to improve, but it's already quite acceptable!

JOSE GEFAELL

18,902 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🇺🇸 ZUCK: META AI IS THE BIGGEST, BEST, IN THE WORLD!! Has anyone ever used it?... “Meta AI now has nearly 600 million monthly actives and as promised is on track to be the most used AI assistant in the world by the end of the year. Llama 3.3 is a new 70 billion parameter text model that performs about as well as our 405 billion parameter model but now it is easier and more efficient to run. So that is the last Lama 3.0 release. The next stop is Lama 4.0.” Source: Instagram

🇺🇸 ZUCK: META AI IS THE BIGGEST, BEST, IN THE WORLD!! Has anyone ever used it?... “Meta AI now has nearly 600 million monthly actives and as promised is on track to be the most used AI assistant in the world by the end of the year. Llama 3.3 is a new 70 billion parameter text model that performs about as well as our 405 billion parameter model but now it is easier and more efficient to run. So that is the last Lama 3.0 release. The next stop is Lama 4.0.” Source: Instagram

Mario Nawfal

482,099 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

RFK jr is waiting for the day he can depose Paul Offit to address the widespread lie that ethylmercury used in vaccines is metabolised and eliminated from the body and is not as harmful as methylmercury which is found in fish and considered toxic. It’s an interesting case study in how junk science can obfuscate the truth. A CDC scientist measured the blood of children a week after vaccination and found no ethylmercury. Then he gave them a tuna fish sandwich and the methylmercury was still there 54 days later. However top experts asked where did the ethylmercury go? NIH replicated the study on monkeys which gave the same results until post mortems revealed the ethylmercury from the vaccine was in the brain at double the amount and had metabolised into the most toxic form of mercury. ‘We now know that 27 years later it is still in the brain causing inflammation causing destruction.’ To this day pregnant women are advised not to eat tuna fish sandwiches but recommended to take the flu shot which still contains mercury. RFK jr’s mastery of the science has them running scared. May the truth prevail.

RFK jr is waiting for the day he can depose Paul Offit to address the widespread lie that ethylmercury used in vaccines is metabolised and eliminated from the body and is not as harmful as methylmercury which is found in fish and considered toxic. It’s an interesting case study in how junk science can obfuscate the truth. A CDC scientist measured the blood of children a week after vaccination and found no ethylmercury. Then he gave them a tuna fish sandwich and the methylmercury was still there 54 days later. However top experts asked where did the ethylmercury go? NIH replicated the study on monkeys which gave the same results until post mortems revealed the ethylmercury from the vaccine was in the brain at double the amount and had metabolised into the most toxic form of mercury. ‘We now know that 27 years later it is still in the brain causing inflammation causing destruction.’ To this day pregnant women are advised not to eat tuna fish sandwiches but recommended to take the flu shot which still contains mercury. RFK jr’s mastery of the science has them running scared. May the truth prevail.

Kat A 🌸

235,513 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

"CO₂ is plant food... It's the gas of life." Geoscientist and astrophysicist Dr. Willie Soon refutes the claim that CO₂ is a pollutant, arguing it is essential to life and plant growth. He contends that empirical climate data shows no clear CO₂-driven warming, while increased planetary greening remains the most evident observed effect.

"CO₂ is plant food... It's the gas of life." Geoscientist and astrophysicist Dr. Willie Soon refutes the claim that CO₂ is a pollutant, arguing it is essential to life and plant growth. He contends that empirical climate data shows no clear CO₂-driven warming, while increased planetary greening remains the most evident observed effect.

Wide Awake Media

148,622 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

The mainstream narrative wants you to believe that humans lived as cavemen for 294,000 years and only began creating organized societies and civilizations in the last 6,000 years, even though the human brain has remained essentially the same for 300,000 years. That doesn't make sense at all. What the elites want to hide from you is that our civilization is being cyclically reset. The pyramids were built by a more advanced society when the Sahara was green. If they admit that our development is not linear, everything will instantly collapse. They want their bloodlines to survive what is coming.

The mainstream narrative wants you to believe that humans lived as cavemen for 294,000 years and only began creating organized societies and civilizations in the last 6,000 years, even though the human brain has remained essentially the same for 300,000 years. That doesn't make sense at all. What the elites want to hide from you is that our civilization is being cyclically reset. The pyramids were built by a more advanced society when the Sahara was green. If they admit that our development is not linear, everything will instantly collapse. They want their bloodlines to survive what is coming.

Open Minded Approach

121,583 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨🇲🇽 Meanwhile in Mexico 2 Doomsday Fish wash up on a beach. Also known as Oarfish they live in the deep in the depths of the ocean, and it’s claimed they only come to the surface, when they inherently know an earthquake is about to strike. Spotting these fish is extremely rare.

🚨🇲🇽 Meanwhile in Mexico 2 Doomsday Fish wash up on a beach. Also known as Oarfish they live in the deep in the depths of the ocean, and it’s claimed they only come to the surface, when they inherently know an earthquake is about to strike. Spotting these fish is extremely rare.

Concerned Citizen

742,117 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

This video gives a rare glimpse into the "fishy" proclivities of wolves in our area. The video was taken in spring just a short distance from a creek wolves have fished at for many years. This past spring was the 10th year we have documented wolves hunting and catching fish—a behavior that had not been documented in boreal systems such as ours until our work, in part, because it is a tough behavior to observe. What is particularly fascinating is that this wolf was not only carrying a fish but carrying two of them. This is interesting because when we captured this behavior on video for the first time in 2018, we observed a wolf fishing, drop them on the creek bank, and wade back in to continue fishing. I.e., the wolf was not immediately consuming the fish it caught but rather fishing while the fishing was hot, and then once the fishing cooled down, would consume the fish. And this video seems to provide some additional evidence that it might be a widespread strategy wolves use. Two other interesting tidbits from this video: 1.) The wolf that dropped the fish was a yearling wolf. The wolf that grabbed the fish at the end was a different wolf. More specifically, the breeding female of the Half-Moon Pack and the older sister of the yearling wolf. 2.) Surprisingly, the black bear seemed very perplexed at finding this fish, and just left it alone without even taking a little nibble. We would have expected a bear to readily take a free meal like this but apparently not. We have collected of detailed information on how, when, where, and why wolves hunt fish in our area. You can read all about that in our scientific article (which is freely-available at the link below!): Freund et al. 2023. The ethology of wolves foraging on freshwater fish in a boreal ecosystem. Royal Society Open Science.

This video gives a rare glimpse into the "fishy" proclivities of wolves in our area. The video was taken in spring just a short distance from a creek wolves have fished at for many years. This past spring was the 10th year we have documented wolves hunting and catching fish—a behavior that had not been documented in boreal systems such as ours until our work, in part, because it is a tough behavior to observe. What is particularly fascinating is that this wolf was not only carrying a fish but carrying two of them. This is interesting because when we captured this behavior on video for the first time in 2018, we observed a wolf fishing, drop them on the creek bank, and wade back in to continue fishing. I.e., the wolf was not immediately consuming the fish it caught but rather fishing while the fishing was hot, and then once the fishing cooled down, would consume the fish. And this video seems to provide some additional evidence that it might be a widespread strategy wolves use. Two other interesting tidbits from this video: 1.) The wolf that dropped the fish was a yearling wolf. The wolf that grabbed the fish at the end was a different wolf. More specifically, the breeding female of the Half-Moon Pack and the older sister of the yearling wolf. 2.) Surprisingly, the black bear seemed very perplexed at finding this fish, and just left it alone without even taking a little nibble. We would have expected a bear to readily take a free meal like this but apparently not. We have collected of detailed information on how, when, where, and why wolves hunt fish in our area. You can read all about that in our scientific article (which is freely-available at the link below!): Freund et al. 2023. The ethology of wolves foraging on freshwater fish in a boreal ecosystem. Royal Society Open Science.

Voyageurs Wolf Project

36,519 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Is climate change the same as global warming? Not quite. The warming of Earth — or global warming — is just one factor that makes up a range of changes that are happening to our planet, which is climate change. And we're studying all of it:

Is climate change the same as global warming? Not quite. The warming of Earth — or global warming — is just one factor that makes up a range of changes that are happening to our planet, which is climate change. And we're studying all of it:

NASA

957,389 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

ABC News’ chief meteorologist, Ginger Zee, had an interesting skit last week on adjustments made to U.S. temperature data by government scientists. 💬 “They change and adjust things all the time, but they don’t hide any of that. They do it because that is how you do science.” And, that is somewhat true, although I do take issue with her statement “That is how you do science.” That is very broad and ambiguous, and not always the case. Sometimes, it’s necessary for scientists to make adjustments to data for quality control purposes. For example, you cannot fairly compare the raw number of named tropical storms or hurricanes in the Atlantic basin last year to the total count in 1851 when the HURDAT2 record begins because a lot of storms that either didn’t make landfall or steamroll unfortunate ships that crossed in their path were missed before we had satellite monitoring. So, scientists have to adjust counts in the past upward with a “best guess” so that a fair comparison can be made to recent tallies. And, with the urban heat island effects, the changes in instrumentation with time and station location changes, it is very reasonable to assume that adjustments need to be made to temperature data as they can introduce spurious trends in the time series. Ginger Zee does make it a point to emphasize that later in the ABC News segment. The adjustments to temperature data, however, are what is responsible for almost all of the observed warming since 1895 in the U.S. While I’m not convinced that “fraud” is going on, I’m also not convinced that their “pairwise homogenization” scheme removes the urban heat island effect from the GHCNd data, or even documented warming from increased population density in rural areas, which may explain most of the warming both in the U.S. and globally as opposed to radiative forcing from carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions. Dr. Roy Spencer makes a good case for this here, and as of last year, was writing a paper on it with colleagues Dr. John Christy and Dr. Danny Braswell. I don’t think it has yet been published, as I can’t find it online. But, here’s a blog article from Spencer’s site detailing their work and preliminary findings. 🔗 I too, plan to look into this soon.

ABC News’ chief meteorologist, Ginger Zee, had an interesting skit last week on adjustments made to U.S. temperature data by government scientists. 💬 “They change and adjust things all the time, but they don’t hide any of that. They do it because that is how you do science.” And, that is somewhat true, although I do take issue with her statement “That is how you do science.” That is very broad and ambiguous, and not always the case. Sometimes, it’s necessary for scientists to make adjustments to data for quality control purposes. For example, you cannot fairly compare the raw number of named tropical storms or hurricanes in the Atlantic basin last year to the total count in 1851 when the HURDAT2 record begins because a lot of storms that either didn’t make landfall or steamroll unfortunate ships that crossed in their path were missed before we had satellite monitoring. So, scientists have to adjust counts in the past upward with a “best guess” so that a fair comparison can be made to recent tallies. And, with the urban heat island effects, the changes in instrumentation with time and station location changes, it is very reasonable to assume that adjustments need to be made to temperature data as they can introduce spurious trends in the time series. Ginger Zee does make it a point to emphasize that later in the ABC News segment. The adjustments to temperature data, however, are what is responsible for almost all of the observed warming since 1895 in the U.S. While I’m not convinced that “fraud” is going on, I’m also not convinced that their “pairwise homogenization” scheme removes the urban heat island effect from the GHCNd data, or even documented warming from increased population density in rural areas, which may explain most of the warming both in the U.S. and globally as opposed to radiative forcing from carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions. Dr. Roy Spencer makes a good case for this here, and as of last year, was writing a paper on it with colleagues Dr. John Christy and Dr. Danny Braswell. I don’t think it has yet been published, as I can’t find it online. But, here’s a blog article from Spencer’s site detailing their work and preliminary findings. 🔗 I too, plan to look into this soon.

Chris Martz

20,230 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

“Do you think that happened in Colombian waters?” “Indeed, it had to be in Colombian waters, off La Guajira.” Reporter Hollman Morris asks Captain Leonardo Vega, fishing companion of murdered fisherman Alejandro Carranza, about the white thing which the U.S. claims to have identified as drug cargo. “When fishing, it’s normal for boats to carry a trammel net, a ’chinchorro’, in order to surround the fish by circling them and then gather them up. That white thing you see is part of a trammel seine net, which is used to trap the fish and bring them onto the boat.”

“Do you think that happened in Colombian waters?” “Indeed, it had to be in Colombian waters, off La Guajira.” Reporter Hollman Morris asks Captain Leonardo Vega, fishing companion of murdered fisherman Alejandro Carranza, about the white thing which the U.S. claims to have identified as drug cargo. “When fishing, it’s normal for boats to carry a trammel net, a ’chinchorro’, in order to surround the fish by circling them and then gather them up. That white thing you see is part of a trammel seine net, which is used to trap the fish and bring them onto the boat.”

Camila

141,679 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Canada is NOT warming at twice the global average, as claimed by ECCC. A report by data scientist Joseph Hickey examined Canada's official temperature records. It found a sudden nationwide +1C jump in 1998 - the same year 72 new stations were added. The increase was simultaneous across the country. But the climate doesn't behave like that. These step changes are what's known as 'measurement artifacts', typically caused by station moves or instrument changes. Remove the artificial jump, and Canada's warming over the past seven decades largely disappears. Also, the official ECCC dataset contains more than 10,000 cases where daily 'minimum' temperatures exceed 'maximums' - a physical impossibility. Canada's climate policy rests on this data. Correct it, and the government's core warming claim collapses.

Canada is NOT warming at twice the global average, as claimed by ECCC. A report by data scientist Joseph Hickey examined Canada's official temperature records. It found a sudden nationwide +1C jump in 1998 - the same year 72 new stations were added. The increase was simultaneous across the country. But the climate doesn't behave like that. These step changes are what's known as 'measurement artifacts', typically caused by station moves or instrument changes. Remove the artificial jump, and Canada's warming over the past seven decades largely disappears. Also, the official ECCC dataset contains more than 10,000 cases where daily 'minimum' temperatures exceed 'maximums' - a physical impossibility. Canada's climate policy rests on this data. Correct it, and the government's core warming claim collapses.

Electroverse

15,641 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

According to geologist Prof. Ian Plimer, Earth's climate was significantly warmer a thousand years ago. "So the real question is, which part of the modern warming is of human origin, and which part is natural? Because we are not as warm as in medieval times, or in Roman times, or in Minoan times."

According to geologist Prof. Ian Plimer, Earth's climate was significantly warmer a thousand years ago. "So the real question is, which part of the modern warming is of human origin, and which part is natural? Because we are not as warm as in medieval times, or in Roman times, or in Minoan times."

Wide Awake Media

57,752 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Trump: But they have no water artificially. They reroute it because they want to save— There's a fish— Delta smelt. By the way, the Delta smelt is doing extremely badly.. they think they have a fish and their way of saving the fish is not to give it water.

Trump: But they have no water artificially. They reroute it because they want to save— There's a fish— Delta smelt. By the way, the Delta smelt is doing extremely badly.. they think they have a fish and their way of saving the fish is not to give it water.

Acyn

610,805 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

A new study shows most modern warming comes from the sun, not CO2. Dutch researcher Ad Huijser analyzed NASA satellite data and Argo ocean records and found that Earth is gaining more energy than greenhouse gases can account for. The planet's energy imbalance is rising by about 0.049 watts per square meter per year, while total greenhouse gas forcing is only 0.019. The missing heat comes from increased sunlight reaching the surface as cloud cover thinned. The data show a natural shift, not a man-made one.

A new study shows most modern warming comes from the sun, not CO2. Dutch researcher Ad Huijser analyzed NASA satellite data and Argo ocean records and found that Earth is gaining more energy than greenhouse gases can account for. The planet's energy imbalance is rising by about 0.049 watts per square meter per year, while total greenhouse gas forcing is only 0.019. The missing heat comes from increased sunlight reaching the surface as cloud cover thinned. The data show a natural shift, not a man-made one.

Electroverse

17,619 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce