Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

The Hidden Dangers of Peptides “It can’t detect whether it’s causing vascularization on a cancer cell. Cancer cells are so hungry when they form a tumor site, they say okay great, now we need blood vessels to survive, so they form their own blood vessel supply. And because they...

ShawnRyan762's profile picture

Shawn Ryan

1,334,930 subscribers

604,039 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Health & WellnessScience & Technology
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

The shear force of blood flow generated during vigorous-intensity exercise kills circulating tumor cells When you work out, the increased blood flow creates higher shear stress in your blood vessels, making it harder for circulating tumor cells to survive These are the very cells responsible for spreading cancer to vital organs By reducing their chances of survival, exercise may play a crucial role in preventing deadly metastasis
1:28

The shear force of blood flow generated during vigorous-intensity exercise kills circulating tumor cells When you work out, the increased blood flow creates higher shear stress in your blood vessels, making it harder for circulating tumor cells to survive These are the very cells responsible for spreading cancer to vital organs By reducing their chances of survival, exercise may play a crucial role in preventing deadly metastasis

FoundMyFitness Clips

393,345 views • 1 year ago

Louisa Nicola says peptides are too risky to take. Not one peptide on the gray market has been through a human safety trial. Zero. BPC-157 is not FDA approved. The FDA blocked compounding pharmacies from using it because of insufficient safety data Yet people are buying it on the black market and injecting it anyway. She also says it also new blood vessels in your body and so do cancer cells. It could potentially help cancer cells grow. In her words: "The same people that are scared of vaccines are the ones buying peptides on the gray market. Make it make sense." You don't know what's in the bottle. You don't know what it's doing to your body. — Louisa Nicola (Louisa Nicola) on the Shawn Ryan’s (Shawn Ryan Show) podcast
1:40

Louisa Nicola says peptides are too risky to take. Not one peptide on the gray market has been through a human safety trial. Zero. BPC-157 is not FDA approved. The FDA blocked compounding pharmacies from using it because of insufficient safety data Yet people are buying it on the black market and injecting it anyway. She also says it also new blood vessels in your body and so do cancer cells. It could potentially help cancer cells grow. In her words: "The same people that are scared of vaccines are the ones buying peptides on the gray market. Make it make sense." You don't know what's in the bottle. You don't know what it's doing to your body. — Louisa Nicola (Louisa Nicola) on the Shawn Ryan’s (Shawn Ryan Show) podcast

Goku

39,600 views • 3 months ago

The scientist who proved tumors grow faster when your blood sugar is high just dropped a truth bomb that could change everything we’ve been told about cancer. Dr. Thomas Seyfried, Professor of Biology at Boston College and one of the world’s top cancer-metabolism researchers, used to believe cancer was a genetic disease… until his own lab showed something completely different. Key moments from this 59-second clip that are blowing minds right now: - “We published one of the first papers ever: the higher your blood sugar, the faster the tumor grows. Undeniable.” - Cancer cells have broken mitochondria — they literally cannot survive on the same fuels your healthy cells thrive on. - When you lower glucose + glutamine through keto + strategic fasting, normal cells switch to ketones and feel great… but tumor cells starve. - “We can selectively marginalize these cells slowly over time. They die, blood vessels disappear, and the body dissolves them.” This is not fringe. This is published, peer-reviewed science from a scientist who has spent decades in the lab proving the metabolic theory of cancer. Watch the full 59 seconds — it’s worth every second of your time. What shocked you the most? Drop your reaction below — I read every single one.
0:59

The scientist who proved tumors grow faster when your blood sugar is high just dropped a truth bomb that could change everything we’ve been told about cancer. Dr. Thomas Seyfried, Professor of Biology at Boston College and one of the world’s top cancer-metabolism researchers, used to believe cancer was a genetic disease… until his own lab showed something completely different. Key moments from this 59-second clip that are blowing minds right now: - “We published one of the first papers ever: the higher your blood sugar, the faster the tumor grows. Undeniable.” - Cancer cells have broken mitochondria — they literally cannot survive on the same fuels your healthy cells thrive on. - When you lower glucose + glutamine through keto + strategic fasting, normal cells switch to ketones and feel great… but tumor cells starve. - “We can selectively marginalize these cells slowly over time. They die, blood vessels disappear, and the body dissolves them.” This is not fringe. This is published, peer-reviewed science from a scientist who has spent decades in the lab proving the metabolic theory of cancer. Watch the full 59 seconds — it’s worth every second of your time. What shocked you the most? Drop your reaction below — I read every single one.

Camus

275,027 views • 8 months ago

I've posted many videos and articles on the benefits of antiparasitic drugs like Hydroxychloroquine Fenbendazole Menbendazole and Ivermectin. It's important to understand what cancer is. Cancer is a micro infestation of parasites. Parasites consume the glycoprotein in your cells while procreating, defecating, and urinating in the cells, killing the cell. They then disperse to go attack other cells. A tumor is your body's response wherein the body encapsulates the area that's infested in order to protect you. NEVER allow a doctor to perform a biopsy on a tumor! If the tumor is in an accessible area, just have it removed. If you biopsy the tumor, you are breaking the bio-dome your body made and releasing the parasites into your bloodstream and lymph nodes. This will spread them into other areas of the body...ie "metastasized". Listen carefully...
1:08

I've posted many videos and articles on the benefits of antiparasitic drugs like Hydroxychloroquine Fenbendazole Menbendazole and Ivermectin. It's important to understand what cancer is. Cancer is a micro infestation of parasites. Parasites consume the glycoprotein in your cells while procreating, defecating, and urinating in the cells, killing the cell. They then disperse to go attack other cells. A tumor is your body's response wherein the body encapsulates the area that's infested in order to protect you. NEVER allow a doctor to perform a biopsy on a tumor! If the tumor is in an accessible area, just have it removed. If you biopsy the tumor, you are breaking the bio-dome your body made and releasing the parasites into your bloodstream and lymph nodes. This will spread them into other areas of the body...ie "metastasized". Listen carefully...

Commentary | Global Ivermectin Research Hub

94,097 views • 11 months ago

I've posted many videos and articles on the benefits of antiparasitic drugs like Hydroxychloroquine Fenbendazole Menbendazole and Ivermectin. It's important to understand what cancer is. Cancer is a micro infestation of parasites. Parasites consume the glycoprotein in your cells while procreating, defecating, and urinating in the cells, killing the cell. They then disperse to go attack other cells. A tumor is your body's response wherein the body encapsulates the area that's infested in order to protect you. NEVER allow a doctor to perform a biopsy on a tumor! If the tumor is in an accessible area, just have it removed. If you biopsy the tumor, you are breaking the bio-dome your body made and releasing the parasites into your bloodstream and lymph nodes. This will spread them into other areas of the body...ie "metastasized". Listen carefully...
1:08

I've posted many videos and articles on the benefits of antiparasitic drugs like Hydroxychloroquine Fenbendazole Menbendazole and Ivermectin. It's important to understand what cancer is. Cancer is a micro infestation of parasites. Parasites consume the glycoprotein in your cells while procreating, defecating, and urinating in the cells, killing the cell. They then disperse to go attack other cells. A tumor is your body's response wherein the body encapsulates the area that's infested in order to protect you. NEVER allow a doctor to perform a biopsy on a tumor! If the tumor is in an accessible area, just have it removed. If you biopsy the tumor, you are breaking the bio-dome your body made and releasing the parasites into your bloodstream and lymph nodes. This will spread them into other areas of the body...ie "metastasized". Listen carefully...

DeepWebSlinger

16,896 views • 1 year ago

Turns out your body has a built-in cancer defense system—and it switches on when you move. Just 30 minutes a day can wake up immune cells, slow tumor growth, and even lower the risk of cancer coming back. Walking, dancing, swimming… it all counts. So the question is: how are you moving today? 💪
0:37

Turns out your body has a built-in cancer defense system—and it switches on when you move. Just 30 minutes a day can wake up immune cells, slow tumor growth, and even lower the risk of cancer coming back. Walking, dancing, swimming… it all counts. So the question is: how are you moving today? 💪

𝗪𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗖𝗵𝗲𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘁

20,395 views • 8 months ago

🚨Big problem! Dr. Suzanne Humphries: "Here's the real sucker punch... the Covid jabs lead to increased cancer susceptibility... but SV40-associated cancer won't respond well... to chemotherapy... [in fact,] radiation makes SV40 cancer far more aggressive...." This clip of Dr. Humphries (Dr Suzanne Humphries), a medical doctor, board-certified internist, nephrologist, and co-author of Dissolving Illusions, is taken from a presentation posted to the Children's Health Defense (Children’s Health Defense) Rumble channel on November 12, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "And here's the real sucker punch. So you remember how SV40 knocks out that p53 gene and protein, which I talked to you before, the cancer suppressor. And that means that not only can the Covid jabs lead to increased cancer susceptibility, right? But SV40-associated cancer won't respond well at all to chemotherapy. "And conventional cancer treatments are likely to make cancer actually go wild and not regress because p53, it actually directs cancer cells to die off. It's necessary for chemo and especially for radiation to do the killing that they're supposed to be doing. And the fact that radiation makes SV40 cancer far more aggressive is the entire reason it was used in the Get Castro project, right? You know, radiating the animals first and then doing the gain of function with radiation. That's why they did it. "So you know, this is some older material, just to show you that they've known for a long time that SV40 blocks the effect of cancer treatments. And so there have been children who have died of SV40-related brain tumors. And the parents go and they do research. And this is what they have found. And so these are articles from like 1997. "So again, this is not something that top scientists should have bypassed. So the other brain cancers and solid cancers have been found to contain the SV40. And that the SV40 binds with the tumor-suppressor gene at p53, and it actually stops those tumor cells from undergoing what's called apoptosis, A-P-O-P-T-O-S-I-S, which really means programmed cell death. And that's how you're able to get cancer to regress, you know, when you're doing whatever you're doing traditionally. "Like, even if it's like, look, we know radiation does make tumor cells regress. Do they come back later? Most of the time, yes, they do cancer, you know, chemotherapy. Like, my father got chemotherapy when he had tumors all over his body. We got nine extra months with him, so I was okay with that. But did they all come back to kill him? Yes, they did, but I got an extra nine months. "But the point being that, you get that programmed cell death. But then if there's a P— If it's an SV40-related cancer especially, you're going to wind up with probably a turbo cancer at that point. "Yeah, I'm just going to read this to you because when I said that people knew about this and there were, you know, parents of children who developed brain tumors and testified in front of Congress. This was one of the very well-educated parents. Exposing SV40-positive cancer cells to chemo and radiation does not kill the cells, but simply creates more genetic mutations, making the cancer more aggressive. The bottom line is that SV40 causes human cancer, stops orthodox cancer treatments like chemo and radiation from providing any benefit and can make the cancer even more aggressive."
3:12

🚨Big problem! Dr. Suzanne Humphries: "Here's the real sucker punch... the Covid jabs lead to increased cancer susceptibility... but SV40-associated cancer won't respond well... to chemotherapy... [in fact,] radiation makes SV40 cancer far more aggressive...." This clip of Dr. Humphries (Dr Suzanne Humphries), a medical doctor, board-certified internist, nephrologist, and co-author of Dissolving Illusions, is taken from a presentation posted to the Children's Health Defense (Children’s Health Defense) Rumble channel on November 12, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "And here's the real sucker punch. So you remember how SV40 knocks out that p53 gene and protein, which I talked to you before, the cancer suppressor. And that means that not only can the Covid jabs lead to increased cancer susceptibility, right? But SV40-associated cancer won't respond well at all to chemotherapy. "And conventional cancer treatments are likely to make cancer actually go wild and not regress because p53, it actually directs cancer cells to die off. It's necessary for chemo and especially for radiation to do the killing that they're supposed to be doing. And the fact that radiation makes SV40 cancer far more aggressive is the entire reason it was used in the Get Castro project, right? You know, radiating the animals first and then doing the gain of function with radiation. That's why they did it. "So you know, this is some older material, just to show you that they've known for a long time that SV40 blocks the effect of cancer treatments. And so there have been children who have died of SV40-related brain tumors. And the parents go and they do research. And this is what they have found. And so these are articles from like 1997. "So again, this is not something that top scientists should have bypassed. So the other brain cancers and solid cancers have been found to contain the SV40. And that the SV40 binds with the tumor-suppressor gene at p53, and it actually stops those tumor cells from undergoing what's called apoptosis, A-P-O-P-T-O-S-I-S, which really means programmed cell death. And that's how you're able to get cancer to regress, you know, when you're doing whatever you're doing traditionally. "Like, even if it's like, look, we know radiation does make tumor cells regress. Do they come back later? Most of the time, yes, they do cancer, you know, chemotherapy. Like, my father got chemotherapy when he had tumors all over his body. We got nine extra months with him, so I was okay with that. But did they all come back to kill him? Yes, they did, but I got an extra nine months. "But the point being that, you get that programmed cell death. But then if there's a P— If it's an SV40-related cancer especially, you're going to wind up with probably a turbo cancer at that point. "Yeah, I'm just going to read this to you because when I said that people knew about this and there were, you know, parents of children who developed brain tumors and testified in front of Congress. This was one of the very well-educated parents. Exposing SV40-positive cancer cells to chemo and radiation does not kill the cells, but simply creates more genetic mutations, making the cancer more aggressive. The bottom line is that SV40 causes human cancer, stops orthodox cancer treatments like chemo and radiation from providing any benefit and can make the cancer even more aggressive."

Sense Receptor

54,169 views • 8 months ago

🚨🚨🚨🚨 Oh-oh! First experiments of genetic vaccines getting absorbed by human cells completed - Prof Sucharit Bhakdi reveals. ----------------------------- Our two lady scientists who are just brilliant, they took cells, human cells, and immersed these cells in the vaccine and they found, and these are the first experiments that have ever been done, okay, that the human cells immediately took up the vaccines and the DNA and the chromosomes, and the chromosomes, bacterial chromosomes, entered the cells and these cells immediately started making the spike protein in horrendous quantity and they have quantified this, they have shown what happens to the spike protein, that it is stable, that it is shed into the blood, into the circulation, they have shown that they can measure this in the blood, they can measure this anywhere actually, and they have shown that the plasmid and the spike production goes on for many, many days. So, what did our girls do? They sent their human cells that had been transfected to Kevin McKernan, begging the question, Kevin, can you find any chromosomal integration of bacterial DNA in the human cell chromosomes? Do you know the answer? He put it up in his substack one week ago, and the answer is yes. He's found it. ------------------------------------- Kevin McKernan
5:27

🚨🚨🚨🚨 Oh-oh! First experiments of genetic vaccines getting absorbed by human cells completed - Prof Sucharit Bhakdi reveals. ----------------------------- Our two lady scientists who are just brilliant, they took cells, human cells, and immersed these cells in the vaccine and they found, and these are the first experiments that have ever been done, okay, that the human cells immediately took up the vaccines and the DNA and the chromosomes, and the chromosomes, bacterial chromosomes, entered the cells and these cells immediately started making the spike protein in horrendous quantity and they have quantified this, they have shown what happens to the spike protein, that it is stable, that it is shed into the blood, into the circulation, they have shown that they can measure this in the blood, they can measure this anywhere actually, and they have shown that the plasmid and the spike production goes on for many, many days. So, what did our girls do? They sent their human cells that had been transfected to Kevin McKernan, begging the question, Kevin, can you find any chromosomal integration of bacterial DNA in the human cell chromosomes? Do you know the answer? He put it up in his substack one week ago, and the answer is yes. He's found it. ------------------------------------- Kevin McKernan

aussie17

333,911 views • 2 years ago

Scientists just figured out how to reverse aging using AI. And this is a massive breakthrough. We can now reprogram any human cell back to age 20. Heart cells, brain cells, skin cells, all reset to their biological prime. And here’s the wildest part…the technology to do this, has already existed since 2012 (it won the Nobel Prize). But the real breakthrough wasn’t possible until this year, when they supercharged it with AI. It’s a wild story. So in 2006, scientists discovered Yamanaka factors. They’re proteins that can basically convert any normal cell into a universal stem cell. Now this was a huge deal, because these stem cells are basically like magic healers. If you have torn muscle tissue, you could inject these stem cells into the area and they will turn into the youthful muscle cells you need. So Yamanaka factors were this insane breakthrough, because they allowed any human to turn any cell you already have into these magic healers. But, there was one big problem… It turns out, the original Yamanaka factors weren’t very good at this stem cell conversion. They could do it, but they just weren’t very reliable. Enter OpenAI...and this is where things get crazy. OpenAI designed a special AI model built specifically to create new proteins. Think of it like ChatGPT but for protein engineering. So they took all the Yamanaka research and asked this new AI to go ham on improving it. And get this… Their version was 50x more effective than the original. They tested it on 50 year old cells and it successfully started repairing 30% of their cells in just 7 days. This is just science fiction…it actually happened. And it sounds crazy, but in a few years, humans will be able to take a shot that will literally reverse the age of their cells.
1:32

Scientists just figured out how to reverse aging using AI. And this is a massive breakthrough. We can now reprogram any human cell back to age 20. Heart cells, brain cells, skin cells, all reset to their biological prime. And here’s the wildest part…the technology to do this, has already existed since 2012 (it won the Nobel Prize). But the real breakthrough wasn’t possible until this year, when they supercharged it with AI. It’s a wild story. So in 2006, scientists discovered Yamanaka factors. They’re proteins that can basically convert any normal cell into a universal stem cell. Now this was a huge deal, because these stem cells are basically like magic healers. If you have torn muscle tissue, you could inject these stem cells into the area and they will turn into the youthful muscle cells you need. So Yamanaka factors were this insane breakthrough, because they allowed any human to turn any cell you already have into these magic healers. But, there was one big problem… It turns out, the original Yamanaka factors weren’t very good at this stem cell conversion. They could do it, but they just weren’t very reliable. Enter OpenAI...and this is where things get crazy. OpenAI designed a special AI model built specifically to create new proteins. Think of it like ChatGPT but for protein engineering. So they took all the Yamanaka research and asked this new AI to go ham on improving it. And get this… Their version was 50x more effective than the original. They tested it on 50 year old cells and it successfully started repairing 30% of their cells in just 7 days. This is just science fiction…it actually happened. And it sounds crazy, but in a few years, humans will be able to take a shot that will literally reverse the age of their cells.

Whiplash347

68,643 views • 9 months ago

“The vaccine decreases the ability to produce white blood cells by 50% from your first vaccine…your ability to make another generation of white blood cells takes 8 weeks…which is why they set it up at 8 weeks…to hit it again…you hit the white blood cell ability while they’re down…they decrease the saline in the second vaccine…and increase the harmful ingredients…so now you have a shift in the ingredients. The second dose decreases your ability to produce white cells by an additional 25%…you’ve wiped out 75% of your Military…and the ability to make your Military. Then the Booster…it has 81 strands of foreign bacteria…that your cells have never come across. You don’t have the antibodies to fight it…your body only has 25% of your white blood cells functioning. Chronic inflammation appears where you had a predisposition…if you have gastric, respiratory, skin autoimmune issues, cancer, etc…all becomes accelerated…as it hits the Central Nervous System causing ‘fight or flight’…and your body is in a constant inflammatory state. Then you get your Second Booster which has 8 strands of HIV…which shuts everything down…incrementally. If you Google this…it’s HIV. We have people walking around with no immune system or the ability to make one…with 81 foreign bacteria and 8 strands of HIV…with an advanced aging process. Once you cannot make white blood cells…you’ll become dependent on boosters for life…like a Diabetic that needs insulin…” -Anonymous Big Pharma Whistleblower
3:31

“The vaccine decreases the ability to produce white blood cells by 50% from your first vaccine…your ability to make another generation of white blood cells takes 8 weeks…which is why they set it up at 8 weeks…to hit it again…you hit the white blood cell ability while they’re down…they decrease the saline in the second vaccine…and increase the harmful ingredients…so now you have a shift in the ingredients. The second dose decreases your ability to produce white cells by an additional 25%…you’ve wiped out 75% of your Military…and the ability to make your Military. Then the Booster…it has 81 strands of foreign bacteria…that your cells have never come across. You don’t have the antibodies to fight it…your body only has 25% of your white blood cells functioning. Chronic inflammation appears where you had a predisposition…if you have gastric, respiratory, skin autoimmune issues, cancer, etc…all becomes accelerated…as it hits the Central Nervous System causing ‘fight or flight’…and your body is in a constant inflammatory state. Then you get your Second Booster which has 8 strands of HIV…which shuts everything down…incrementally. If you Google this…it’s HIV. We have people walking around with no immune system or the ability to make one…with 81 foreign bacteria and 8 strands of HIV…with an advanced aging process. Once you cannot make white blood cells…you’ll become dependent on boosters for life…like a Diabetic that needs insulin…” -Anonymous Big Pharma Whistleblower

Liz Churchill

3,504,698 views • 3 years ago

🚨Here's what a lot of people misunderstand about cancer treatment, says drpaulmarik: "Cancer is not homogeneous. The somatic mutation theory—which is the current theory in which treatment is based—posits that you have a mutation in a single cell, and that gives rise to a whole population of cells that look the same and have the same mutation. But the Cancer Genome Atlas has shown that that theory is completely wrong. The cancer cells are very heterogeneous, so they're made up of very different populations of cells with different mutations, and one of the populations is the cancer stem cell. It's a sub-population of the cancer. These are generally slow-growing, but they're distinct in that they have the ability to divide indefinitely and grow indefinitely, and can change their characteristics. Basically, if you get rid of the fast-dividing cells, which is the cancer, you're left with the stem cells, which then become the roots, which grow back to form the tumor" sometimes years later. Conventional chemotherapy gets rid of the fast-dividing regular cancer cells but *NOT* the stem cells. So the key question is: how do you get rid of the stem cells? “There are a number of repurposed drugs that do it, and this has been well-established in scientific medical literature. One of the most effective treatments to knock out the stem cell is the famous horse deworming medicine," says drpaulmarik. Yes, ivermectin. Independent Medical Alliance
6:30

🚨Here's what a lot of people misunderstand about cancer treatment, says drpaulmarik: "Cancer is not homogeneous. The somatic mutation theory—which is the current theory in which treatment is based—posits that you have a mutation in a single cell, and that gives rise to a whole population of cells that look the same and have the same mutation. But the Cancer Genome Atlas has shown that that theory is completely wrong. The cancer cells are very heterogeneous, so they're made up of very different populations of cells with different mutations, and one of the populations is the cancer stem cell. It's a sub-population of the cancer. These are generally slow-growing, but they're distinct in that they have the ability to divide indefinitely and grow indefinitely, and can change their characteristics. Basically, if you get rid of the fast-dividing cells, which is the cancer, you're left with the stem cells, which then become the roots, which grow back to form the tumor" sometimes years later. Conventional chemotherapy gets rid of the fast-dividing regular cancer cells but *NOT* the stem cells. So the key question is: how do you get rid of the stem cells? “There are a number of repurposed drugs that do it, and this has been well-established in scientific medical literature. One of the most effective treatments to knock out the stem cell is the famous horse deworming medicine," says drpaulmarik. Yes, ivermectin. Independent Medical Alliance

Jan Jekielek

96,002 views • 1 year ago

Tumors (parasitic egg sacs) are when your white blood cells quickly identify the foreign invaders in your body and wrap them with hard cells like a spiderweb so that they can no longer spread to other parts of the body. When they are cut open, as in biopsy, the toxins leak/spread
1:16

Tumors (parasitic egg sacs) are when your white blood cells quickly identify the foreign invaders in your body and wrap them with hard cells like a spiderweb so that they can no longer spread to other parts of the body. When they are cut open, as in biopsy, the toxins leak/spread

Cleanse Parasites .com 🧹🪱 Herbal Cleanse Co.

91,045 views • 1 year ago

🚨ImmunityBio’s Anktiva: A New FDA-Approved Immunotherapy for certain bladder cancer. They are also developing treatments that may reduce the need for strong chemo, for blood cancer, lung cancer, brain cancer, and more. Broader approvals may take time. Someone call the President and fast-track this. Dr. Pat Soon-Shiong leads development beyond typical biotech efforts. Most cancer medicines, like chemotherapy, work by poisoning fast-growing cells to kill the cancer. This also hurts healthy cells, causing side effects like hair loss and weakness. Anktiva is different. It is an immunotherapy that wakes up your body’s own immune cells; natural killer cells and T cells to hunt and destroy cancer cells themselves. It acts like a booster shot for your immune system, using a protein called IL-15 to make these cells multiply and remember how to fight cancer long-term. ImmunityBio is different from most companies because of 3 big unique things: 1. They wake up 3 kinds of fighter cells at the same time: • NK cells (natural killers) • CD8 T cells (main attackers) • CD4 T cells (helpers) These three work together like a basketball team. This makes the body remember the cancer for a long time (maybe years). 2. They have a special cell line called NK-92. → It’s like buying frozen pizza instead of making dough from scratch every time. Doctors can just thaw it and give it to any patient. No need to take cells from the sick kid, customize them, and make them super weak with hospital chemo (that’s what normal CAR-T does). 3. Their medicine Anktiva gives a long, steady boost to the immune cells. Older drugs (like IL-2) gave a short, crazy boost that made people very sick. Anktiva is seems safer, so far. Exciting to follow the development. Interview: Chris Cuomo (NewsNation) — “Killing Cancer”
8:29

🚨ImmunityBio’s Anktiva: A New FDA-Approved Immunotherapy for certain bladder cancer. They are also developing treatments that may reduce the need for strong chemo, for blood cancer, lung cancer, brain cancer, and more. Broader approvals may take time. Someone call the President and fast-track this. Dr. Pat Soon-Shiong leads development beyond typical biotech efforts. Most cancer medicines, like chemotherapy, work by poisoning fast-growing cells to kill the cancer. This also hurts healthy cells, causing side effects like hair loss and weakness. Anktiva is different. It is an immunotherapy that wakes up your body’s own immune cells; natural killer cells and T cells to hunt and destroy cancer cells themselves. It acts like a booster shot for your immune system, using a protein called IL-15 to make these cells multiply and remember how to fight cancer long-term. ImmunityBio is different from most companies because of 3 big unique things: 1. They wake up 3 kinds of fighter cells at the same time: • NK cells (natural killers) • CD8 T cells (main attackers) • CD4 T cells (helpers) These three work together like a basketball team. This makes the body remember the cancer for a long time (maybe years). 2. They have a special cell line called NK-92. → It’s like buying frozen pizza instead of making dough from scratch every time. Doctors can just thaw it and give it to any patient. No need to take cells from the sick kid, customize them, and make them super weak with hospital chemo (that’s what normal CAR-T does). 3. Their medicine Anktiva gives a long, steady boost to the immune cells. Older drugs (like IL-2) gave a short, crazy boost that made people very sick. Anktiva is seems safer, so far. Exciting to follow the development. Interview: Chris Cuomo (NewsNation) — “Killing Cancer”

Black Panther Capital

40,249 views • 7 months ago

UMBILLICAL CORD They cut those cords KNOWING they are packed full of stem cells! Then they try to sell those stem cells back?? No way! Homebirth each and every time!! We are not meant to cut and clamp umbillical cords. Cord circulation continues for 30+ minutes after birth- meaning for over 30 minutes, stem cells, blood and vital nutrients are meant to be pumping into the baby. When the cord is clamped right away, the child usually gasps for air, because they were recieving oxygen from the cord. This is why babies can be born underwater and not drown, as they don't need to use their lungs right away. Letting the cord detach on its own, like all animals in the wild, allows for maximum stem cell and blood tranfusion to the baby, leading to healthier, more developed babies.”
1:25

UMBILLICAL CORD They cut those cords KNOWING they are packed full of stem cells! Then they try to sell those stem cells back?? No way! Homebirth each and every time!! We are not meant to cut and clamp umbillical cords. Cord circulation continues for 30+ minutes after birth- meaning for over 30 minutes, stem cells, blood and vital nutrients are meant to be pumping into the baby. When the cord is clamped right away, the child usually gasps for air, because they were recieving oxygen from the cord. This is why babies can be born underwater and not drown, as they don't need to use their lungs right away. Letting the cord detach on its own, like all animals in the wild, allows for maximum stem cell and blood tranfusion to the baby, leading to healthier, more developed babies.”

Not A Number

1,364,435 views • 1 year ago

UMBILLICAL CORD TRUTH “They cut those cords KNOWING they are jam packed full of stem cells! Then they try to sell those stem cells back?? No way! Homebirth each and every time!! We are not meant to cut and clamp umbillical cords. Cord circulation continues for 30+ minutes after birth meaning for over 30 minutes, stem cells, blood and vital nutrients are meant to be pumping into the baby When the cord is clamped right away, the child usually gasps for air because they were recieving oxygen from the cord. This is why babies can be born underwater and not drown, as they don't need to use their lungs right away. Letting the cord detach on its own, like all animals in the wild, allows for maximum stem cell and blood tranfusion to the baby, leading to healthier, more developed babies.” HistoryS
1:25

UMBILLICAL CORD TRUTH “They cut those cords KNOWING they are jam packed full of stem cells! Then they try to sell those stem cells back?? No way! Homebirth each and every time!! We are not meant to cut and clamp umbillical cords. Cord circulation continues for 30+ minutes after birth meaning for over 30 minutes, stem cells, blood and vital nutrients are meant to be pumping into the baby When the cord is clamped right away, the child usually gasps for air because they were recieving oxygen from the cord. This is why babies can be born underwater and not drown, as they don't need to use their lungs right away. Letting the cord detach on its own, like all animals in the wild, allows for maximum stem cell and blood tranfusion to the baby, leading to healthier, more developed babies.” HistoryS

Jack Straw

175,592 views • 11 months ago

Oncologist Dr. William Makis: "The turbo cancers after the COVID vaccines do respond to the antiparasitics, and they respond very well... [And] why do these antiparasitics work?" Todd Callender: "Cancer's a parasite?" Makis: "That's one possibility." This clip of Dr. Makis (William Makis), a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from an interview with attorney Todd Callender posted to the VaxxCHOICE (VaxxCHOICE) Rumble channel on November 21, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- Dr. Makis: "The turbo cancers after the COVID vaccines do respond to the antiparasitics and they respond very well. This is, you know, whether it's ivermectin, fenbendazole or mebendazole, these patients are responding. "Now this is very important because patients who've developed cancer after taking Covid vaccines, they don't respond usually to conventional treatments. That's one of the hallmarks of turbo cancer is they present at a very late stage. These are extremely rapidly growing tumors. They're coming in at stage four. And it's whether it's young women with breast cancer, women in their 20s, something we've never seen before, young women with, men and women with colon cancer in their 20s and 30s. "Again, we've never seen—" Callender: "Two- year-olds, I've heard of two- year-olds with colon cancer—" Dr. Makis: "—we've never seen this before. That's the incredible part. And they're not responding to conventional treatments. So, they're not responding to chemo, they're not responding to radiation therapy, immunotherapy, or if they do response, they have a very, very short response time or remission time. And then the cancer comes roaring back. "And in a lot of these tragic cases, the patient dies within six months. This is another one of the features of turbo cancer is the prognosis is extremely poor if you go the conventional route. So you need something else. Now when you're using antiparasitics, for cancer, the dose is higher than the dose you would use to treat parasites or to treat Covid. So I give just a rule of thumb for ivermectin, for example, it's about five times the dose that you would need for cancer, about 5 to 10 times the dose than if you were just treating parasites or viruses. "And to go into the— why does it work? Why do these antiparasitics work?" Callender: "Cancer's a parasite?" Dr. Makis: "Well, that's one possibility. But there's more to it than that because, out of the 400 papers that have been published, a lot of those researchers look at the mechanisms. They are trying to identify the mechanisms of how ivermectin is treating these cancers. "And you've got, for example, there was one study published a few years ago, Mexican researchers, again, you're not going to see this done in the United States, Mexico. Mexican researchers took 28 different cancer cell lines, applied ivermectin to them, and all of them responded. Now to various degrees, you had breast cancer and ovarian cancer actually responding the most to ivermectin. You had the most cancer cell killing when they were exposed to ivermectin. "But when they look at the mechanisms, they've identified a number of interesting things. For example, ivermectin shuts down and kills cancer stem cells. Now, this is important because cancer stem cells are the reason chemotherapy doesn't work. When you have stage four pancreatic cancer, stage four ovarian cancer, and you go to your oncologist, they will tell you, we will give you chemo, but we can't cure you. It's palliative chemo. It'll buy you an extra six months, an extra 12 months of life. "The reason why they say that is why the chemo is palliative, not curative. It's is because chemo cannot kill cancer stem cells, which are not rapidly dividing. Chemo will kill everything that's rapidly dividing, but cancer stem cells are not rapidly dividing. And so the chemo will kill the rapidly dividing tumor cells, and it'll leave the cancer stem cells alone, while the cancer stem cells will start rapidly dividing a year later, two years later, they're going to spread to other parts of the body. Suddenly you've got recurrence, you've got metastases. Ivermectin will shut down and kill cancer stem cells. "So imagine you, added to your chemo regimen, and now you've essentially turned what's palliative chemo or a palliative situation to potentially a curative situation. And I really do believe I've come to the point, having helped over 7,000 cancer patients in the last year, I've come to the point where I could confidently say that stage 4 pancreatic cancer is curable, stage 4 ovarian cancer is curable, stage 4 colon cancer, lung cancer. These cancers are curable. I think if you add repurposed drugs, you add antiparasitics, you can turn these into curable situations. "Now, of course, we have to prove that. We have to do the research, do the publications. But in the meantime, I say stage 4 cancer patients don't have 10 years to wait for mainstream oncology or mainstream medicine to catch up with what we're seeing already clinically, in practice."
4:27

Oncologist Dr. William Makis: "The turbo cancers after the COVID vaccines do respond to the antiparasitics, and they respond very well... [And] why do these antiparasitics work?" Todd Callender: "Cancer's a parasite?" Makis: "That's one possibility." This clip of Dr. Makis (William Makis), a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from an interview with attorney Todd Callender posted to the VaxxCHOICE (VaxxCHOICE) Rumble channel on November 21, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- Dr. Makis: "The turbo cancers after the COVID vaccines do respond to the antiparasitics and they respond very well. This is, you know, whether it's ivermectin, fenbendazole or mebendazole, these patients are responding. "Now this is very important because patients who've developed cancer after taking Covid vaccines, they don't respond usually to conventional treatments. That's one of the hallmarks of turbo cancer is they present at a very late stage. These are extremely rapidly growing tumors. They're coming in at stage four. And it's whether it's young women with breast cancer, women in their 20s, something we've never seen before, young women with, men and women with colon cancer in their 20s and 30s. "Again, we've never seen—" Callender: "Two- year-olds, I've heard of two- year-olds with colon cancer—" Dr. Makis: "—we've never seen this before. That's the incredible part. And they're not responding to conventional treatments. So, they're not responding to chemo, they're not responding to radiation therapy, immunotherapy, or if they do response, they have a very, very short response time or remission time. And then the cancer comes roaring back. "And in a lot of these tragic cases, the patient dies within six months. This is another one of the features of turbo cancer is the prognosis is extremely poor if you go the conventional route. So you need something else. Now when you're using antiparasitics, for cancer, the dose is higher than the dose you would use to treat parasites or to treat Covid. So I give just a rule of thumb for ivermectin, for example, it's about five times the dose that you would need for cancer, about 5 to 10 times the dose than if you were just treating parasites or viruses. "And to go into the— why does it work? Why do these antiparasitics work?" Callender: "Cancer's a parasite?" Dr. Makis: "Well, that's one possibility. But there's more to it than that because, out of the 400 papers that have been published, a lot of those researchers look at the mechanisms. They are trying to identify the mechanisms of how ivermectin is treating these cancers. "And you've got, for example, there was one study published a few years ago, Mexican researchers, again, you're not going to see this done in the United States, Mexico. Mexican researchers took 28 different cancer cell lines, applied ivermectin to them, and all of them responded. Now to various degrees, you had breast cancer and ovarian cancer actually responding the most to ivermectin. You had the most cancer cell killing when they were exposed to ivermectin. "But when they look at the mechanisms, they've identified a number of interesting things. For example, ivermectin shuts down and kills cancer stem cells. Now, this is important because cancer stem cells are the reason chemotherapy doesn't work. When you have stage four pancreatic cancer, stage four ovarian cancer, and you go to your oncologist, they will tell you, we will give you chemo, but we can't cure you. It's palliative chemo. It'll buy you an extra six months, an extra 12 months of life. "The reason why they say that is why the chemo is palliative, not curative. It's is because chemo cannot kill cancer stem cells, which are not rapidly dividing. Chemo will kill everything that's rapidly dividing, but cancer stem cells are not rapidly dividing. And so the chemo will kill the rapidly dividing tumor cells, and it'll leave the cancer stem cells alone, while the cancer stem cells will start rapidly dividing a year later, two years later, they're going to spread to other parts of the body. Suddenly you've got recurrence, you've got metastases. Ivermectin will shut down and kill cancer stem cells. "So imagine you, added to your chemo regimen, and now you've essentially turned what's palliative chemo or a palliative situation to potentially a curative situation. And I really do believe I've come to the point, having helped over 7,000 cancer patients in the last year, I've come to the point where I could confidently say that stage 4 pancreatic cancer is curable, stage 4 ovarian cancer is curable, stage 4 colon cancer, lung cancer. These cancers are curable. I think if you add repurposed drugs, you add antiparasitics, you can turn these into curable situations. "Now, of course, we have to prove that. We have to do the research, do the publications. But in the meantime, I say stage 4 cancer patients don't have 10 years to wait for mainstream oncology or mainstream medicine to catch up with what we're seeing already clinically, in practice."

Sense Receptor

96,616 views • 9 months ago

"I think deuterium is the reason why you have cancer." — Stephanie Seneff, MIT researcher. Deuterium is a heavy form of hydrogen naturally present in water and food. Your mitochondria are extremely sensitive to it — too much deuterium disrupts their ability to produce ATP and triggers excess reactive oxygen species. When deuterium accumulates systemically, every cell in your body starts struggling. Seneff's hypothesis: A cell senses the overload and transforms itself into a cancer cell. Not to harm you. To help you. Cancer cells abandon their normal function and obsess on one thing: duplicating themselves. Their metabolism shifts entirely. They suppress oxidative phosphorylation — the process by which mitochondria generate ATP using oxygen — repurposing them toward anabolic synthesis — to avoid the reactive oxygen species that high deuterium would generate. Instead they run glycolysis. Massive glucose intake. The output: lactate — carrying a deuterium-depleted proton — shipped out into circulation. Low-deuterium fuel delivered to the host. The cancer cell also relocates its V-ATPase pumps — protein pumps embedded in the cell membrane — to the outer surface, pumping deuterium-depleted protons directly into the tumor microenvironment — while hoarding deuterium inside itself. It is self-sacrificial. Taking on the burden so the rest of the body doesn't have to. Immune cells flood the tumor. But they don't attack. The cancer is nourishing them — lactate and deuterium-depleted protons — providing what their damaged mitochondria need to recover. Seneff notes the same lactate and low pH environment also signals immune cells to stand down — suppressing activation and allowing the tumor to survive in the process. Once the immune cells recover, they turn on the tumor and clear it. When deuterium levels drop low enough — the cancer cell's job is done. It undergoes apoptosis. Gabor Somlyai, Hungarian biochemist and cancer researcher showed that when cancer cells are placed in deuterium-depleted water, they stop multiplying and undergo apoptosis. In high-deuterium water — they thrive. He documented patients rejected by mainstream oncology — told to go home and die. They began drinking deuterium-depleted water. Some lived far beyond predicted life expectancy. Some achieved complete recovery. This also might explain why the ketogenic diet works against cancer. Animal fats are the lowest deuterium macronutrient. A ketogenic state naturally lowers systemic deuterium intake. Combined with glucose restriction — cancer cells depend heavily on glucose to run glycolysis — both mechanisms rest on the same biology. Thomas Seyfried, Professor of Biology at Boston College, reached the conclusion that cancer is a mitochondrial metabolic disease, not a genetic one. Seneff goes one step further: deuterium overload is why the mitochondria malfunction in the first place. According to her, cancer isn't a random malfunction. It's a coordinated biological response to a systemic deuterium overload.
3:24

"I think deuterium is the reason why you have cancer." — Stephanie Seneff, MIT researcher. Deuterium is a heavy form of hydrogen naturally present in water and food. Your mitochondria are extremely sensitive to it — too much deuterium disrupts their ability to produce ATP and triggers excess reactive oxygen species. When deuterium accumulates systemically, every cell in your body starts struggling. Seneff's hypothesis: A cell senses the overload and transforms itself into a cancer cell. Not to harm you. To help you. Cancer cells abandon their normal function and obsess on one thing: duplicating themselves. Their metabolism shifts entirely. They suppress oxidative phosphorylation — the process by which mitochondria generate ATP using oxygen — repurposing them toward anabolic synthesis — to avoid the reactive oxygen species that high deuterium would generate. Instead they run glycolysis. Massive glucose intake. The output: lactate — carrying a deuterium-depleted proton — shipped out into circulation. Low-deuterium fuel delivered to the host. The cancer cell also relocates its V-ATPase pumps — protein pumps embedded in the cell membrane — to the outer surface, pumping deuterium-depleted protons directly into the tumor microenvironment — while hoarding deuterium inside itself. It is self-sacrificial. Taking on the burden so the rest of the body doesn't have to. Immune cells flood the tumor. But they don't attack. The cancer is nourishing them — lactate and deuterium-depleted protons — providing what their damaged mitochondria need to recover. Seneff notes the same lactate and low pH environment also signals immune cells to stand down — suppressing activation and allowing the tumor to survive in the process. Once the immune cells recover, they turn on the tumor and clear it. When deuterium levels drop low enough — the cancer cell's job is done. It undergoes apoptosis. Gabor Somlyai, Hungarian biochemist and cancer researcher showed that when cancer cells are placed in deuterium-depleted water, they stop multiplying and undergo apoptosis. In high-deuterium water — they thrive. He documented patients rejected by mainstream oncology — told to go home and die. They began drinking deuterium-depleted water. Some lived far beyond predicted life expectancy. Some achieved complete recovery. This also might explain why the ketogenic diet works against cancer. Animal fats are the lowest deuterium macronutrient. A ketogenic state naturally lowers systemic deuterium intake. Combined with glucose restriction — cancer cells depend heavily on glucose to run glycolysis — both mechanisms rest on the same biology. Thomas Seyfried, Professor of Biology at Boston College, reached the conclusion that cancer is a mitochondrial metabolic disease, not a genetic one. Seneff goes one step further: deuterium overload is why the mitochondria malfunction in the first place. According to her, cancer isn't a random malfunction. It's a coordinated biological response to a systemic deuterium overload.

no.mind

191,146 views • 4 months ago

Oncologist Dr. William Makis: "A...woman who had 6 mRNA vaccines...her breast cancer...[came] back...they stain it for spike protein from the [Covid] vaccine and...found [it] all over...the breast cancer metastasis...there was [jab] spike protein all over her tumor recurrence." "[And] another paper that is being attacked and being pushed for retraction is a paper that sequenced the vaccine-injured individuals, they took their blood, they sequenced their blood, and they found thousands of genetic alterations that were caused by the mRNA vaccines, [so] really... it just does all kinds of genetic damage that they've been able to now identify by sequencing the blood of a number of people who have had the vaccines." This clip of Dr. Makis (William Makis), a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from an interview with Seth Holehouse () posted to Rumble on November 21, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Just in the past two months, there's been five or six studies that have come out looking at the integration of the genetic injections, the genetic 'vaccines' into the genome and causing cancer. There's the Italian study of 300,000 people, the South Korean study of 8.4 million people. "There's now been a case of an 85-year-old Japanese woman who had six mRNA vaccines. After her first three vaccines, which were Pfizer, she developed a breast lump. She was diagnosed with breast cancer, she had, two more vaccines, she had a mastectomy, she was considered cancer free. "Then she had her sixth vaccine, I believe it was a Pfizer vaccine. And then suddenly, within a few weeks, she has a new lump on her chest wall because she doesn't have her breasts anymore. New lump on the chest wall. They biopsy it, they find out her breast cancer has come back, but this time they stain it for the spike protein from the vaccine and they found the spike protein all over the metastasis, the breast cancer metastasis. And they test for nucleocapsid from the virus, no nucleocapsid, so it couldn't have been, that she got a COVID infection and that lingering infection, the virus somehow integrated and caused her cancer. "So this came out one month ago, proof that there was spike protein from the vaccine all over, her tumor recurrence. This was really the sixth Pfizer shot, caused her cancer to come back and the spike protein was in there, which means that there had been integration, into what became her cancer cells, her recurrent cancer cells. "We have another case that's been published in the past month, literally within days of this Japanese case. It was a 31-year-old woman who had three Moderna vaccines and developed an aggressive bladder tumor. The bladder tumor was genetically sequenced and the researchers found that it contained an exact match, a genetic sequence that was an exact match for the Pfizer vaccine. "Now it's interesting, she had the Moderna vaccines, they found a match for the Pfizer vaccine, but there are sequences that are the same in both vaccines. And they also did further genetic testing and they found that she had all kinds of genetic, instabilities and damage that had arisen after she had taken these three mRNA vaccines. "Again, published just a month ago, another paper that is being attacked and being pushed for retraction is a paper that sequenced the vaccine-injured individuals, they took their blood, they sequenced their blood and they found thousands of genetic alterations that were caused by the mRNA vaccines, really like that it just does all kinds of genetic damage that they've been able to now identify by sequencing the blood of, a number of people who have had the vaccines. [But] that paper is being pushed for retraction, and so, there's a heavy push to really not make any link between the vaccines and cancer."
3:14

Oncologist Dr. William Makis: "A...woman who had 6 mRNA vaccines...her breast cancer...[came] back...they stain it for spike protein from the [Covid] vaccine and...found [it] all over...the breast cancer metastasis...there was [jab] spike protein all over her tumor recurrence." "[And] another paper that is being attacked and being pushed for retraction is a paper that sequenced the vaccine-injured individuals, they took their blood, they sequenced their blood, and they found thousands of genetic alterations that were caused by the mRNA vaccines, [so] really... it just does all kinds of genetic damage that they've been able to now identify by sequencing the blood of a number of people who have had the vaccines." This clip of Dr. Makis (William Makis), a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from an interview with Seth Holehouse () posted to Rumble on November 21, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Just in the past two months, there's been five or six studies that have come out looking at the integration of the genetic injections, the genetic 'vaccines' into the genome and causing cancer. There's the Italian study of 300,000 people, the South Korean study of 8.4 million people. "There's now been a case of an 85-year-old Japanese woman who had six mRNA vaccines. After her first three vaccines, which were Pfizer, she developed a breast lump. She was diagnosed with breast cancer, she had, two more vaccines, she had a mastectomy, she was considered cancer free. "Then she had her sixth vaccine, I believe it was a Pfizer vaccine. And then suddenly, within a few weeks, she has a new lump on her chest wall because she doesn't have her breasts anymore. New lump on the chest wall. They biopsy it, they find out her breast cancer has come back, but this time they stain it for the spike protein from the vaccine and they found the spike protein all over the metastasis, the breast cancer metastasis. And they test for nucleocapsid from the virus, no nucleocapsid, so it couldn't have been, that she got a COVID infection and that lingering infection, the virus somehow integrated and caused her cancer. "So this came out one month ago, proof that there was spike protein from the vaccine all over, her tumor recurrence. This was really the sixth Pfizer shot, caused her cancer to come back and the spike protein was in there, which means that there had been integration, into what became her cancer cells, her recurrent cancer cells. "We have another case that's been published in the past month, literally within days of this Japanese case. It was a 31-year-old woman who had three Moderna vaccines and developed an aggressive bladder tumor. The bladder tumor was genetically sequenced and the researchers found that it contained an exact match, a genetic sequence that was an exact match for the Pfizer vaccine. "Now it's interesting, she had the Moderna vaccines, they found a match for the Pfizer vaccine, but there are sequences that are the same in both vaccines. And they also did further genetic testing and they found that she had all kinds of genetic, instabilities and damage that had arisen after she had taken these three mRNA vaccines. "Again, published just a month ago, another paper that is being attacked and being pushed for retraction is a paper that sequenced the vaccine-injured individuals, they took their blood, they sequenced their blood and they found thousands of genetic alterations that were caused by the mRNA vaccines, really like that it just does all kinds of genetic damage that they've been able to now identify by sequencing the blood of, a number of people who have had the vaccines. [But] that paper is being pushed for retraction, and so, there's a heavy push to really not make any link between the vaccines and cancer."

Sense Receptor

35,372 views • 9 months ago