Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
The Hidden Dangers of Peptides “It can’t detect whether it’s causing vascularization on a cancer cell. Cancer cells are so hungry when they form a tumor site, they say okay great, now we need blood vessels to survive, so they form their own blood vessel supply. And because they... show more
605,949 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 35
This has only been hypothicized, it has not been observed or documented. This slop of "it's possible" is horse shit used to try & scare people. Fucking pharma shills.
the only peptides that are safe are the ones big pharma can patent and charge a fortune for! 😂🤡🤡🤡
Kind of a weird way of debating that safety point. She rightfully says that there is no controlled trial in humans, but then goes on to suggest a potential carcinogenic effect. Well, we don’t know that either, if we don’t have trials on that. Might she end up being right? Yes, maybe, but as of now this sounds more like having an edgy take on the topic.
A few of the peptides that work by causing angiogenesis can accelerate the growth of tumours that are already there but they don't cause cancer. Those particular peptides should be avoided by those with a cancer history but a lot of peptides have nothing to do with angiogenesis so you can't make a blanket statement that "peptides cause cancer" . That's just sensationalism
Can't wait for her to show the data on all of this peptide cancer. With the millions of people taking them for the past 2 decades there must be trailers full of bodies that put Covid to shame.
Pep Tide Reta 🏴☠️🏴☠️ 21 weeks Blood work and all metabolic markers have Improved
your body is filled with over 7k of these peptides.. your putting in your body whats already there.. dosage matters obv.. but hey go inject some foreign dna altering vaccine with no safety data.. you'll be fine!! where is the podcast on vaccine long term safety data? lol
Love your show but sorry this Pharma shill is only giving her narrative specifics on BP-157. Watch any drug commercial and literally 3/4 of it is the warnings that go along with taking the drug. Peptides are significantly safer than anything big parma produces.
Peptide bros are about to discover what "long-term safety data" means. Yea. Tumor vasculature doesn't care about your TRT podcast.
Been listening to this pod on my walk to work and while working in the garage. I’m not all the way through it, but this gal is WAY off with vaccines. Also WAY off on PPIs for GERD. She’s clearly a trust pharma and the FDA kind of person.
shut the fuck up. you don’t know what efficacy is of vaccines or of ivermectin or fenbendazole or a host of other repurposed medications and therapies big pharma wants to control healthcare and they really can’t with peptides. so jump on controlled op podcasts and start sowing seeds….
Her scoop of ice cream for dessert is likely more carcinogenic than BP-157, but there's no money in it for Pharma to study. Gym bros have used it for over a decade, but if that doesn't count, then frankly, she's speculating about outcomes as well. Everyone weighs risks/results.
Straight speculation on BPC-157. They have zero trials proving this theory. Big Pharma is pushing this theory because they see the potential that peptides will destroy their profit margins.
This lady needs her proper randomized control paper sponsored by her favorite pharma lobby group.
I’m sorry. 16 minutes of absolute misinformation!!! A shingles shot cures dementia??!! 😆🤣 please DO NOT get a shingles jab. This lady is fooked in the head. The neurological damage those shots can cause is well documented and one study showing such a breathtaking outcome should have to be repeated many times before allowed to make such a ridiculous claim!
Here we go the paid opposition coming down on peptides…🤦♂️🏴☠️
Omg!! Polio and smallpox eradication from vaccines is a canard used by vaccine injury deniers! Worst guest I’ve seen on this show!!! Polio is still very much around even in America it just has different names!!! In 3rd world countries wild polio is largely gone but replaced with vaccine induced polio. The vaccines are causing the polio cases!! In America they call it transverse myelitis, Guillain-Barré and other similar terms. Small pox was eradicated due to improved living, sanitation and quarantining outbreaks. A wonderful very knowledgeable physician @DrSuzanneH7 can tell you all about it. You should have her on your show.
Wrong BPC-157 doesn’t globally upregulate VEGF
Wait until she talks about vaccines. You’ll know who sent her.
The FDA doesn’t want trials because they are peptides! They can’t patent them! The pharmaceutical companies can’t make money. This woman isn’t too intelligent… 🤣🤣
“We’re an obese nation which is killing many people.” Along comes a naturally compounded chain of amino acids that targets certain receptors. “We’re killing everyone creating cancer” Rage bait
She seems like she’s bought and paid for with her blanket statements. People just need to educate themselves before they get all Willy Nilly about injecting themselves. Fast food is gonna kill more people than peps but that’s still a thing if we’re gonna speak in generalizations.
She supports all the vaccines, including the original Covid vaccine rollout. Big Pharma shill.
bullshit podcastslop BPC doesn’t globally upregulate VEGF
Where are all the people flooding emergency rooms with negative effects.
This podcast was better when real warriors told their stories.
Nope. Get Dr. Alex Tatum on your show, Sean. Get BOTH sides!
This bitch is a vaccine poison pusher.
She is Pro Vaccines anti peptides. Follow your intuition.
She literally has no idea what she even talking about. She’s a joke. This is just fluff and positioning. There are legit pharmacies that currently make peptides.
Be careful here. The black market issue is a result of the FDA banning them. It created a black market. We need to remember the FDA doesn’t do things that benefit us only big harma. Big harma can only patent synthetic peptides or modified versions of natural peptides. BPC-157 is a natural peptide. Big harma can’t benefit. Zero interest in it. When a therapy’s risks are unknown rather than known to be harmful, the system responds differently. The absence of large-scale safety data becomes grounds for dismissal, prohibition, or silence. It’s a catch 22!!
Where the fuck was her on the mRNA vaccine? Pro-vaccine but against peptides. Thank you I will be doing the opposite this fucking lizards say.
This is stupid af. Working out causes angiogenisis too.
How do they know they're bad if they have no studies to prove that? Isn't that the same reasoning they feed to all of us for any alternative medicine? "We don't recommend it or suggest it because there is no studies" You cant "not recommend" and "fear monger" at the same time.
@louisanicola_ should not talk about vaccines. The paper she mentioned about the shingles vaccine (see below) is just one example. About her claims that vaccines saves lives, see enclosed chart.
![🚨Big problem! Dr. Suzanne Humphries: "Here's the real sucker punch... the Covid jabs lead to increased cancer susceptibility... but SV40-associated cancer won't respond well... to chemotherapy... [in fact,] radiation makes SV40 cancer far more aggressive...." This clip of Dr. Humphries (Dr Suzanne Humphries), a medical doctor, board-certified internist, nephrologist, and co-author of Dissolving Illusions, is taken from a presentation posted to the Children's Health Defense (Children’s Health Defense) Rumble channel on November 12, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "And here's the real sucker punch. So you remember how SV40 knocks out that p53 gene and protein, which I talked to you before, the cancer suppressor. And that means that not only can the Covid jabs lead to increased cancer susceptibility, right? But SV40-associated cancer won't respond well at all to chemotherapy. "And conventional cancer treatments are likely to make cancer actually go wild and not regress because p53, it actually directs cancer cells to die off. It's necessary for chemo and especially for radiation to do the killing that they're supposed to be doing. And the fact that radiation makes SV40 cancer far more aggressive is the entire reason it was used in the Get Castro project, right? You know, radiating the animals first and then doing the gain of function with radiation. That's why they did it. "So you know, this is some older material, just to show you that they've known for a long time that SV40 blocks the effect of cancer treatments. And so there have been children who have died of SV40-related brain tumors. And the parents go and they do research. And this is what they have found. And so these are articles from like 1997. "So again, this is not something that top scientists should have bypassed. So the other brain cancers and solid cancers have been found to contain the SV40. And that the SV40 binds with the tumor-suppressor gene at p53, and it actually stops those tumor cells from undergoing what's called apoptosis, A-P-O-P-T-O-S-I-S, which really means programmed cell death. And that's how you're able to get cancer to regress, you know, when you're doing whatever you're doing traditionally. "Like, even if it's like, look, we know radiation does make tumor cells regress. Do they come back later? Most of the time, yes, they do cancer, you know, chemotherapy. Like, my father got chemotherapy when he had tumors all over his body. We got nine extra months with him, so I was okay with that. But did they all come back to kill him? Yes, they did, but I got an extra nine months. "But the point being that, you get that programmed cell death. But then if there's a P— If it's an SV40-related cancer especially, you're going to wind up with probably a turbo cancer at that point. "Yeah, I'm just going to read this to you because when I said that people knew about this and there were, you know, parents of children who developed brain tumors and testified in front of Congress. This was one of the very well-educated parents. Exposing SV40-positive cancer cells to chemo and radiation does not kill the cells, but simply creates more genetic mutations, making the cancer more aggressive. The bottom line is that SV40 causes human cancer, stops orthodox cancer treatments like chemo and radiation from providing any benefit and can make the cancer even more aggressive."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1995343450158547189/amplify_video_thumb/1995341157581324288/img/0ZSx3GyaVnAq0C3O.jpg)
![Oncologist Dr. William Makis: "The turbo cancers after the COVID vaccines do respond to the antiparasitics, and they respond very well... [And] why do these antiparasitics work?" Todd Callender: "Cancer's a parasite?" Makis: "That's one possibility." This clip of Dr. Makis (William Makis), a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from an interview with attorney Todd Callender posted to the VaxxCHOICE (VaxxCHOICE) Rumble channel on November 21, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- Dr. Makis: "The turbo cancers after the COVID vaccines do respond to the antiparasitics and they respond very well. This is, you know, whether it's ivermectin, fenbendazole or mebendazole, these patients are responding. "Now this is very important because patients who've developed cancer after taking Covid vaccines, they don't respond usually to conventional treatments. That's one of the hallmarks of turbo cancer is they present at a very late stage. These are extremely rapidly growing tumors. They're coming in at stage four. And it's whether it's young women with breast cancer, women in their 20s, something we've never seen before, young women with, men and women with colon cancer in their 20s and 30s. "Again, we've never seen—" Callender: "Two- year-olds, I've heard of two- year-olds with colon cancer—" Dr. Makis: "—we've never seen this before. That's the incredible part. And they're not responding to conventional treatments. So, they're not responding to chemo, they're not responding to radiation therapy, immunotherapy, or if they do response, they have a very, very short response time or remission time. And then the cancer comes roaring back. "And in a lot of these tragic cases, the patient dies within six months. This is another one of the features of turbo cancer is the prognosis is extremely poor if you go the conventional route. So you need something else. Now when you're using antiparasitics, for cancer, the dose is higher than the dose you would use to treat parasites or to treat Covid. So I give just a rule of thumb for ivermectin, for example, it's about five times the dose that you would need for cancer, about 5 to 10 times the dose than if you were just treating parasites or viruses. "And to go into the— why does it work? Why do these antiparasitics work?" Callender: "Cancer's a parasite?" Dr. Makis: "Well, that's one possibility. But there's more to it than that because, out of the 400 papers that have been published, a lot of those researchers look at the mechanisms. They are trying to identify the mechanisms of how ivermectin is treating these cancers. "And you've got, for example, there was one study published a few years ago, Mexican researchers, again, you're not going to see this done in the United States, Mexico. Mexican researchers took 28 different cancer cell lines, applied ivermectin to them, and all of them responded. Now to various degrees, you had breast cancer and ovarian cancer actually responding the most to ivermectin. You had the most cancer cell killing when they were exposed to ivermectin. "But when they look at the mechanisms, they've identified a number of interesting things. For example, ivermectin shuts down and kills cancer stem cells. Now, this is important because cancer stem cells are the reason chemotherapy doesn't work. When you have stage four pancreatic cancer, stage four ovarian cancer, and you go to your oncologist, they will tell you, we will give you chemo, but we can't cure you. It's palliative chemo. It'll buy you an extra six months, an extra 12 months of life. "The reason why they say that is why the chemo is palliative, not curative. It's is because chemo cannot kill cancer stem cells, which are not rapidly dividing. Chemo will kill everything that's rapidly dividing, but cancer stem cells are not rapidly dividing. And so the chemo will kill the rapidly dividing tumor cells, and it'll leave the cancer stem cells alone, while the cancer stem cells will start rapidly dividing a year later, two years later, they're going to spread to other parts of the body. Suddenly you've got recurrence, you've got metastases. Ivermectin will shut down and kill cancer stem cells. "So imagine you, added to your chemo regimen, and now you've essentially turned what's palliative chemo or a palliative situation to potentially a curative situation. And I really do believe I've come to the point, having helped over 7,000 cancer patients in the last year, I've come to the point where I could confidently say that stage 4 pancreatic cancer is curable, stage 4 ovarian cancer is curable, stage 4 colon cancer, lung cancer. These cancers are curable. I think if you add repurposed drugs, you add antiparasitics, you can turn these into curable situations. "Now, of course, we have to prove that. We have to do the research, do the publications. But in the meantime, I say stage 4 cancer patients don't have 10 years to wait for mainstream oncology or mainstream medicine to catch up with what we're seeing already clinically, in practice."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1993127013713166353/amplify_video_thumb/1993124339852754944/img/m5izGyXtNBTWkWd4.jpg)