The HIV Injection Challenge: Dr. Robert Willner On October 28, 1994, Dr. Robert Willner went on live television and injected himself with the blood of an HIV-positive man. He repeated the demonstration on multiple occasions and never tested HIV-positive. He was a man of conviction who bravely stood up... to the HIV/AIDS fraud. Throughout history, many individuals have experimented on themselves and others, successfully challenging the prevailing assumptions supporting the germ "theory" of disease.show more

Why a single finger-stick is not evidence that HIV is not blood-borne This is the first place the argument collapses, and it collapses on probability, not ideology. The per-act risk of HIV infection after a percutaneous needlestick involving HIV-positive blood is on the order of 0.23–0.3%—roughly 1 in 333 to 1 in 435 untreated exposures. That figure comes from prospective occupational-exposure studies of healthcare workers, not from theory. Risk is higher with deep injury, a hollow-bore needle that was in a vein or artery, visible blood on the device, and high source viral load; it is lower with a shallow finger prick that transfers a tiny volume. Willner’s act was a shallow finger-stick with a tiny inoculum. The expected outcome of one such event is no infection. Observing the expected outcome of a low-probability event is not a disproof of the event class. It is the same error as concluding that Russian roulette is safe because one spin didn’t kill you.

You have started posting nonsense lies in the name of conspiracy. I'm blocking you for that reason. What a retard.

自相矛盾：那還有什麼陽不陽性之說？！

He died like 2 years later

Doesn't hold up. One exposure proves little: a needlestick with HIV-positive blood transmits the virus about 0.23% of the time. Untreated, the median time from HIV infection to AIDS is 8 to 10 years. Meta-analysis and review. PMIDs 16549963, 11144640

This is not an injection. Injection means a syringe. This is stupid

What a dumbass

،،