正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

The House Oversight Committee just released documents that further suggest that Epstein worked for the CIA, which would mean your government was financing a child trafficking operation for elites with taxpayer dollars. In 2019, Alex Acosta affirmed that there had been reports that Epstein was working for the government...

71,071 次观看 • 10 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

HOLLYWOOD CARTOON MADE FOR KIDS THREW IN YOUR CHILD’S FACE THAT ELITES & THE CIA WERE TRAFFICKING CHILDREN TO “EVIL SECRET ISLANDS” LIKE JEFFREY EPSTEIN’S! Hollywood has been throwing in our face for years that elite pedophiles like Jeffrey Epstein are trafficking children in tandem with intelligence agencies like the CIA - that YOU pay for! They not only did this in entertainment meant for adults, they flaunted it in cartoons that are geared toward children. This should enrage every single American! In 2005, the Cartoon Network ran an episode of the kid’s show Johnny Test featuring a helicopter named CIA Pizza — pizza is a pedophile code word that has been confirmed by the FBI, DOJ records, local law enforcement, the Wall Street Journal and many other sources — with the slogan “We Deliver To Evil Secret Islands”. This cartoon ran at the same time when we know Epstein was not only trafficking kids to his island, he also had many connections to the CIA and was most likely working with them! 1. Epstein met with Joe Biden’s current CIA Chief, William Burns, after his first child sex crime convictions. 2. When Epstein was serving his first jail sentence for child sex crimes, his bodyguard went to CIA headquarters for an alleged special training course. The CIA gave Epstein’s bodyguard a book with a secret message to deliver to Epstein. 3. Ghislaine Maxwell had a helicopter and submarine license. Maxwell transported trafficking victims to Epstein’s pedophile island via a helicopter he bought for her. So a cartoon meant for children, just happened to run an episode about delivering pizza aka trafficking children to secret evil islands that perfectly sums up the child sex trafficking operation Epstein & Maxwell were running. They’ve been throwing it in YOUR face and your children’s faces for years — including in the cartoons they watch that YOU thought were innocent. If this as a parent doesn’t enrage you, nothing will. Now is the time to say enough is enough & take action!
0:10

Sensitive content

HOLLYWOOD CARTOON MADE FOR KIDS THREW IN YOUR CHILD’S FACE THAT ELITES & THE CIA WERE TRAFFICKING CHILDREN TO “EVIL SECRET ISLANDS” LIKE JEFFREY EPSTEIN’S! Hollywood has been throwing in our face for years that elite pedophiles like Jeffrey Epstein are trafficking children in tandem with intelligence agencies like the CIA - that YOU pay for! They not only did this in entertainment meant for adults, they flaunted it in cartoons that are geared toward children. This should enrage every single American! In 2005, the Cartoon Network ran an episode of the kid’s show Johnny Test featuring a helicopter named CIA Pizza — pizza is a pedophile code word that has been confirmed by the FBI, DOJ records, local law enforcement, the Wall Street Journal and many other sources — with the slogan “We Deliver To Evil Secret Islands”. This cartoon ran at the same time when we know Epstein was not only trafficking kids to his island, he also had many connections to the CIA and was most likely working with them! 1. Epstein met with Joe Biden’s current CIA Chief, William Burns, after his first child sex crime convictions. 2. When Epstein was serving his first jail sentence for child sex crimes, his bodyguard went to CIA headquarters for an alleged special training course. The CIA gave Epstein’s bodyguard a book with a secret message to deliver to Epstein. 3. Ghislaine Maxwell had a helicopter and submarine license. Maxwell transported trafficking victims to Epstein’s pedophile island via a helicopter he bought for her. So a cartoon meant for children, just happened to run an episode about delivering pizza aka trafficking children to secret evil islands that perfectly sums up the child sex trafficking operation Epstein & Maxwell were running. They’ve been throwing it in YOUR face and your children’s faces for years — including in the cartoons they watch that YOU thought were innocent. If this as a parent doesn’t enrage you, nothing will. Now is the time to say enough is enough & take action!

LIZ CROKIN

4,585,114 次观看 • 2 年前

Robert Sprague, Ohio’s current Treasurer, initially announced a run for Ohio Governor. He later withdrew and sought to become Vivek Ramaswamy’s lieutenant governor pick … unsuccessfully. Now he has entered the race for Ohio Secretary of State against Marcell Strbich Marcell Strbich despite having no demonstrable experience or evidence showing a desire to secure Ohio’s voter rolls or Ohio’s elections. Campaign finance reports show Sprague accepted $23,000 from Les and Abigail Wexner, including $18,000 from Les Wexner personally. Les Wexner has been called a Jeffrey Epstein “co-conspirator”. THAT’S NOT A GOOD THING. On Friday, February 20th, the Ohio Republican Party State Central Committee will consider endorsing a candidate in this contested Secretary of State primary. Sprague is expected to seek that endorsement, even though public polling shows him trailing Strbich by eight (8) points. If the Committee chooses to endorse in this race, many believe it will favor Sprague who is a long-time insider & career officeholder … despite the potential general election implications of the Wexner donations. The presumptive Democratic nominee, Allison Russo, is a formidable campaigner. She has never accepted donations from either Wexner. SHE WAS NOT THAT STUPID. IT IS REASONABLE TO EXPECT THAT RUSSO WILL HIGHLIGHT THE WEXNER CONNECTION CONSISTENTLY BETWEEN NOW AND NOVEMBER. Many Republican voters remain deeply concerned about the broader Epstein scandal and want full investigations & accountability wherever warranted. Those voters may VIEW Wexner’s contributions to SPRAGUE as POLITICALLY TOXIC. The question before the State Central Committee is straightforward: will it allow primary voters to decide this nomination without interference, or will it issue an endorsement in a contested race? AN ENDORSEMENT OF SOMEONE TAINTED BY WEXNER-EPSTEIN MONEY? We will know the answer on Friday. Unfortunately, while the video below is AI generated, I assure you this is how Alex Triantafilou, Alex Triantafilou 🇺🇸🐘🇺🇸, Chairman & “Oz Behind the Curtain” of the Ohio Republican Party, feels in his cold black heart about this situation.

Mark Pukita

11,474 次观看 • 5 个月前

I’ve seen a lot of people accuse Saudi Arabia of fabricating the moon sighting. Below is proof that it wasn’t. The first video is the exact moment the moon was sighted. The second video is the official testifying before a judge about the set up and what he saw exactly. He says "At 6:11pm (precisely) we saw an opening in the sky, and we all saw the moon and around the opening was all clouds" There is also a picture but it is against the Sunnah to share proof when a testimony is given by a Muslim so I refuse to share it in case we set a precedent to always share a picture and that would be a big error. A testimony of a Muslim is enough as we see from the Hadith of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم It was narrated that Ibn 'Abbaas رضي الله عنه said: A Bedouin came to the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم and said, I have seen the new moon tonight. He said, "Do you bear witness that there is no god except Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah?" He said, Yes. He said, "Get up, O Bilaal, and announce to the people that they should fast tomorrow." [at Tirmidhi: 691 Abu Dawood: [2340], an Nasaa'i: [2112] Ibn Maajah: [1652]. Shaykh al Albaani رحمه الله said: So we see from the Hadith that he, صلى الله عليه وسلم، instructed Bilaal to announce to the people that they would fast the next day. So the Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم was content with the testimony of this man, whom he did not know, on the basis that he bore witness that there is no God but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, i.e. he knew that he was a Muslim, but he did not check on him any further and he did not try to find out how intelligent and smart he was, as was the case in the first Hadith in which the witness was 'Abd Allah ibn 'Umar ibn al Khattab رضي الله عنه. Yet despite that he accepted his testimony. This Hadith makes things easier for people, and what this means is that the judge should be content with the witness as he appears to be, without needing to find people who know this man and can testify that he is of good character, as was the habit of judges since time immemorial. Rather it is sufficient to know that he is a Muslim. This man was a Bedouin of whom the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم had no prior knowledge and he was content that he uttered the Shahaadatayn before him. So he was a Muslim with the same rights and duties as any other, and based on his testimony and the fact that he was a Muslim he said: O Bilaal, announced to the people that they should fast tomorrow. [At Ta laaq 'ala Kitaab Bulugh al Maraam, (audio tape), Hadith 5, Kitaab al Siyaam] This Hadith is evidence for the principle that a Muslim is to be regarded as being of good character unless proven otherwise. Al San'aani رحمه الله said concerning what we learn from the hadeeth of Ibn 'Abbaas رضي الله عنه: It indicates that the basic principle with regard to the Muslims is that they are of good character, because the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم did not ask the Bedouin for anything except the Shahaadah. [Subul as Salaam by as San'aani: 2/153] And Allah knows best.

ابن البخاري

245,087 次观看 • 1 年前

I haven’t followed the Epstein story closely and don’t have strong, settled views on it. But even from a distance, a few things are obvious. There’s literally a video of Alan Dershowitz admitting he got a massage at Epstein’s mansion. That alone—just the basic fact that Epstein had “masseuses” hanging around ready to give “massages” to his guests—makes it all but certain that a lot of people got those massages, and very likely that at least some of those encounters went beyond massages. That much, I take as a given. The real question, then, is what Epstein was actually doing? Was he simply offering his friends a good time? Was it transactional, i.e. exchanging favors or deals for access to these “services”? Or was he collecting blackmail material? Any of those are plausible, and others may be too. But calling the whole thing a hoax falls apart the second you watch that clip. Dershowitz’s own admission proves there’s a there there. Now, it may not have been as widespread or depraved as some have claimed. Some of the women involved gave contradictory testimony. That doesn’t erase what happened, but it might mean the scope was narrower than assumed. Still, people have a right to ask how far it all went. What the government should be saying is simple: Yes, the rollout was a disaster, especially the ridiculous “binder” stunt. Yes, Epstein was a predator. Yes, Alex Acosta never should have let him off. Yes, it is probably too late to piece everything together. And yes, we cannot reliably determine how old some of the girls were or exactly who did what and that is also why names cannot simply be released, because, as Dershowitz claims of himself, some guests may have engaged in conduct that was technically legal and consensual. And at the very least, one basic question should be easy to answer: did Epstein work for U.S. intelligence? He’s dead. They can say yes or no.

Hans Mahncke

16,791 次观看 • 1 年前

FLASHBACK: WHAT YOU MISSED IN THE LES WEXNER VIDEO TESTIMONY ON JEFFREY EPSTEIN Everyone heard Wexner’s lawyer on the hot mic threaten to k*ll Les if he didn't answer as instructed, showing that even though Wexner himself—a billionaire who gave Jeffrey Epstein power over his entire business & financial empire—only has limited autonomy in a certain context, and is accountable to a higher authority. And what is that context & authority? "The Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion" clearly state it in Chapter 15 on "Ruthless Suppression": "Death is the inevitable end for all. They all die when required. We execute in such ways that none save THE BROTHERHOOD can ever have a suspicion of it. Even THE BROTHERHOOD in its turn dare not protest. By such methods we have plucked out of our midst the very root of protest against our own disposition. While preaching tolerance to the GOY we at the same time keep our own people and our agents in a state of unquestioning submission." Les Wexner & his fellow gangsters are all accountable to their mutual BROTHERHOOD. They all enjoy the power, fame & prestige this Brotherhood provides. But step out of line, or endanger the Brotherhood, and the Brotherhood won't hesitate to dispatch you. It's a blood oath. Robert Maxwell, Yitzhak Rabin, and yes, maybe even Jeffrey Epstein, were all dispatched this way (and many more). Useful, until they weren't. This is the reality we saw on display in Les Wexner’s testimony. Our government is run by the global jewish organized criminal empire using media, censorship, infiltration, blackmail, extortion, bribery, fear, cancelation & assassination. Still think the Protocols are a "forgery?" To read, study and analyze the Protocols using AI, visit Follow: Uncensored.AI Jake Shields Fight Back Podcast

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

83,549 次观看 • 4 个月前

Regarding the Eric Trump / Daniel Cormier “text scandal”, I am open to being convinced otherwise, but I do not believe for one second that Eric Trump would text something so stupid to Daniel Cormier. It’s laughably stupid on its face to think that Eric Trump would ask a UFC commentator if any of the fights are “rigged”. That he would ask it in writing. And that he would not, for example, just pick up the phone and call Dana White or Joe Rogan himself. That said, I just want to understand what happened. Daniel Cormier said he was hacked. Is that to say he was hacked at the text level, or the X post level? Did he in fact make the post, and delete it? If he made the post, did he do it as a joke to illustrate how absurd the text hack was, but realized how the post could be misinterpreted as real? Or did someone make the post from his X account he subsequently deleted it. I know there are some who are going to say he made the post in earnest, thinking the text messages were real, intending to call out the “corruption”, and he has since been threatened, deleted the post, and claimed “hack”, etc. I can tell you exactly why I do not believe, even if he made the post, he did it believing the text message was real, intending to call out the “corruption”. If Cormier seriously thought the text messages were real, he would understand that by posting it publicly, it would literally destroy the UFC, his livelihood and his legacy - in addition to the legacy of everyone who has ever competed in the UFC. There is no realm of the universe in which even if it were in fact a real text that he actually received from Eric Trump, he would post it publicly. Because it would mean the end of the UFC. I just want to know if he actually made the post from his X account, or if the entire post was the result of a hack (hence the subsequent deleting of the post). Serious and sincere questions for clarity that would benefit everyone Eric Trump

Viva Frei

30,167 次观看 • 1 个月前