Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🇮🇷 The intelligence community always assessed that killing the Supreme Leader would rally Iran behind the regime. The funeral crowds just proved it at a scale nobody modeled… Joe Kent ran counterterrorism for this government, and his verdict on those processions was unsparing: the Israelis outplayed Washington by getting...

MarioNawfal's profile picture

Mario Nawfal

3,711,020 subscribers

304,812 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & TechnologieNachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump's “Economic D-Day” could be a tripwire designed to drag him back into the Iran war Only weeks ago, Washington was openly discussing renewed strikes and regime change. Now Trump is leaning into economic warfare, secondary sanctions and diplomacy instead. Fmr. U.S. National Counterterrorism Center director Joe Kent welcomes that shift. He'd much rather argue about sanctions than watch Americans and Iranians start killing each other again. But there's something about it he finds deeply suspicious. Some of the same Iran hawks who were demanding Trump restart the bombing are suddenly enthusiastic supporters of the sanctions strategy. And Joe wonders whether Trump understands exactly where it could lead. Iran has already threatened that if Washington seriously attempts to economically strangle it, Tehran may respond militarily. And America has left troops, bases and ships across the region within range of Iranian missiles and drones. So the escalation ladder is already sitting there: Sanctions begin to bite, Iran concludes its economy is being placed under existential threat, strikes American interests, Washington retaliates, and suddenly the war is back on. That concern became even more significant after Sec. of War Hegseth was asked whether kinetic strikes are now effectively on pause. His answer was clear: America is “by no means” foreclosing military action; if Iran “overplays their hand” or attacks the U.S military, Washington will do what it needs to do. For Joe, that creates a dangerous paradox. If Trump's sanctions don't work, Iran doesn't concede and pressure builds in Washington to escalate. But if the sanctions do work and begin seriously threatening the Iranian economy, Tehran has even more incentive to retaliate militarily rather than simply allow itself to be strangled. Either road can lead back to the same place. And Joe thinks some of the people around Trump know it. Joe Kent
35:35

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump's “Economic D-Day” could be a tripwire designed to drag him back into the Iran war Only weeks ago, Washington was openly discussing renewed strikes and regime change. Now Trump is leaning into economic warfare, secondary sanctions and diplomacy instead. Fmr. U.S. National Counterterrorism Center director Joe Kent welcomes that shift. He'd much rather argue about sanctions than watch Americans and Iranians start killing each other again. But there's something about it he finds deeply suspicious. Some of the same Iran hawks who were demanding Trump restart the bombing are suddenly enthusiastic supporters of the sanctions strategy. And Joe wonders whether Trump understands exactly where it could lead. Iran has already threatened that if Washington seriously attempts to economically strangle it, Tehran may respond militarily. And America has left troops, bases and ships across the region within range of Iranian missiles and drones. So the escalation ladder is already sitting there: Sanctions begin to bite, Iran concludes its economy is being placed under existential threat, strikes American interests, Washington retaliates, and suddenly the war is back on. That concern became even more significant after Sec. of War Hegseth was asked whether kinetic strikes are now effectively on pause. His answer was clear: America is “by no means” foreclosing military action; if Iran “overplays their hand” or attacks the U.S military, Washington will do what it needs to do. For Joe, that creates a dangerous paradox. If Trump's sanctions don't work, Iran doesn't concede and pressure builds in Washington to escalate. But if the sanctions do work and begin seriously threatening the Iranian economy, Tehran has even more incentive to retaliate militarily rather than simply allow itself to be strangled. Either road can lead back to the same place. And Joe thinks some of the people around Trump know it. Joe Kent

Mario Nawfal

313,501 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

🚨 JUST NOW: Iran just HELPED broker the new Israel-Lebanon/Hezbollah ceasefire with President Trump and Qatar, seeking to stop the firing on all sides "A U.S. official says it was brokered by Qatar, the United States and with help from Iran." "This is not a retreat for Israel from these established security zones in southern Lebanon and the IDF said that this is not a retreat for Israel."
1:27

🚨 JUST NOW: Iran just HELPED broker the new Israel-Lebanon/Hezbollah ceasefire with President Trump and Qatar, seeking to stop the firing on all sides "A U.S. official says it was brokered by Qatar, the United States and with help from Iran." "This is not a retreat for Israel from these established security zones in southern Lebanon and the IDF said that this is not a retreat for Israel."

Eric Daugherty

433,048 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨BREAKING: Mehek Cooke🇺🇸 explains it: The left and their media puppets are already spinning Joe Kent’s resignation like it’s some huge blow to Trump. They’re hammering the “no imminent threat” line all day to undermine the strikes on Iran. But listen up: That was NEVER the standard here. This wasn’t some low-level counterterrorism warrant waiting for a smoking gun or a missile mid-flight. This was a NUCLEAR THRESHOLD call, preventing a regime that’s been enriching uranium, funding terror proxies, and screaming “Death to America” from crossing the point of no return. You DON’T wait for the mushroom cloud to decide it’s “imminent.” Joe Kent was Director of the National Counterterrorism Center, a Trump appointee and longtime supporter, but he walked over this. In his letter, he said Iran posed no imminent threat and blamed pressure from Israel. That’s his view, but it doesn’t change the facts: Iran has been on the brink, and decisive action stops escalation before it turns catastrophic. Had a great convo with Bianca de la Garza breaking this down, she gets it.
1:52

🚨BREAKING: Mehek Cooke🇺🇸 explains it: The left and their media puppets are already spinning Joe Kent’s resignation like it’s some huge blow to Trump. They’re hammering the “no imminent threat” line all day to undermine the strikes on Iran. But listen up: That was NEVER the standard here. This wasn’t some low-level counterterrorism warrant waiting for a smoking gun or a missile mid-flight. This was a NUCLEAR THRESHOLD call, preventing a regime that’s been enriching uranium, funding terror proxies, and screaming “Death to America” from crossing the point of no return. You DON’T wait for the mushroom cloud to decide it’s “imminent.” Joe Kent was Director of the National Counterterrorism Center, a Trump appointee and longtime supporter, but he walked over this. In his letter, he said Iran posed no imminent threat and blamed pressure from Israel. That’s his view, but it doesn’t change the facts: Iran has been on the brink, and decisive action stops escalation before it turns catastrophic. Had a great convo with Bianca de la Garza breaking this down, she gets it.

Gunther Eagleman™

14,301 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

The U.S. just reimposed the oil sanctions it lifted under the MOU, and with that, almost nothing of the deal is left standing Three ships hit in 24 hours on the Omani corridor, and Treasury answered by revoking the waivers, the clearest breach yet of the agreement's core trade. Stack it up: Lebanon unresolved, strikes on Iranian soil, attacks on US bases, and now the sanctions are back. David Gibbs's summary was stark: the only thing that survives from June 17 is the absence of full-blown war. And he thinks Washington is bargaining from the weaker chair. Those funeral crowds ended the regime-change fantasy for good, he argues; a government that may have been unpopular in February now has millions visibly behind it and no political room to concede. The MOU was already tilted Iran's way. Tehran will drive a harder bargain, not a softer one. His Ukraine verdict was colder. He's studied wars for a living and sees no ending short of Russian victory, unless it's nuclear. At Princeton he just read George Kennan's letters warning the Clinton administration in the NINETIES that NATO expansion toward Ukraine would provoke exactly this. The thread tying both wars together, in his telling, is hubris: a 1990s intoxication with American power that Iraq and Afghanistan somehow never cured.
27:49

The U.S. just reimposed the oil sanctions it lifted under the MOU, and with that, almost nothing of the deal is left standing Three ships hit in 24 hours on the Omani corridor, and Treasury answered by revoking the waivers, the clearest breach yet of the agreement's core trade. Stack it up: Lebanon unresolved, strikes on Iranian soil, attacks on US bases, and now the sanctions are back. David Gibbs's summary was stark: the only thing that survives from June 17 is the absence of full-blown war. And he thinks Washington is bargaining from the weaker chair. Those funeral crowds ended the regime-change fantasy for good, he argues; a government that may have been unpopular in February now has millions visibly behind it and no political room to concede. The MOU was already tilted Iran's way. Tehran will drive a harder bargain, not a softer one. His Ukraine verdict was colder. He's studied wars for a living and sees no ending short of Russian victory, unless it's nuclear. At Princeton he just read George Kennan's letters warning the Clinton administration in the NINETIES that NATO expansion toward Ukraine would provoke exactly this. The thread tying both wars together, in his telling, is hubris: a 1990s intoxication with American power that Iraq and Afghanistan somehow never cured.

Mario Nawfal

227,405 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Wow. Joe Kent just revealed the last thing Charlie Kirk said to him: “The last time I saw Charlie Kirk on this Earth was in June, in the West Wing.” “He looked me in the eye and he said … Joe, stop us from getting into a war with Iran.” “One of President Trump’s closest advisors was vocally advocating for us to not go to war with Iran and for us to rethink, at least, our relationship with the Israelis.” “And then he’s suddenly publicly assassinated and we’re not allowed to ask any questions about that?” “The investigation that I was a part of [with] the National Counterterrorism Center, we were stopped from continuing to investigate.” “But there was still a lot for us to look into that I can’t really get into.” “There’s unanswered questions.” “We know, because of the text messages that have been made public, that Charlie was under a lot of pressure from a lot of pro-Israel donors.” Joe Kent Tucker Carlson
2:09

Wow. Joe Kent just revealed the last thing Charlie Kirk said to him: “The last time I saw Charlie Kirk on this Earth was in June, in the West Wing.” “He looked me in the eye and he said … Joe, stop us from getting into a war with Iran.” “One of President Trump’s closest advisors was vocally advocating for us to not go to war with Iran and for us to rethink, at least, our relationship with the Israelis.” “And then he’s suddenly publicly assassinated and we’re not allowed to ask any questions about that?” “The investigation that I was a part of [with] the National Counterterrorism Center, we were stopped from continuing to investigate.” “But there was still a lot for us to look into that I can’t really get into.” “There’s unanswered questions.” “We know, because of the text messages that have been made public, that Charlie was under a lot of pressure from a lot of pro-Israel donors.” Joe Kent Tucker Carlson

Holden Culotta

4,667,246 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨 Joe Kent: The Israelis have consistently been several steps ahead of us "Early on in the war, the Israelis got us on board with killing the Ayatollah, and then they went and killed the negotiators and a lot of the moderates. The reason why the Israelis did that was because they knew this war in America would become very politically controversial, and so they wanted to make it so that we couldn't extricate ourselves from it. And I think we're seeing the result of that right now." Joe Kent
2:48

🚨 Joe Kent: The Israelis have consistently been several steps ahead of us "Early on in the war, the Israelis got us on board with killing the Ayatollah, and then they went and killed the negotiators and a lot of the moderates. The reason why the Israelis did that was because they knew this war in America would become very politically controversial, and so they wanted to make it so that we couldn't extricate ourselves from it. And I think we're seeing the result of that right now." Joe Kent

Mario Nawfal

209,390 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨Former Israeli Acting President: ‘Trump needed a SHORT WAR, Netanyahu needed a LONG WAR against Iran. Netanyahu hasn’t profited A THING politically from this war on Iran!’ ‘This war with Iran was a competition between two end dates. Trump had to end it and to finish it before it has an impact on the midterm elections, and therefore it should have been a very short exercise or a manoeuvre. And Netanyahu has to extend it as long as possible because he wants to go into elections in a state of war, because Israelis, when there is a state of war, usually rally around the flag of the government and the flag of the prime minister. So the motivation of what is the role of the war for the internal politics was very different in American internal politics and the Israeli domestic one. It looks to me that, as for now, Netanyahu did not profit a thing politically, internally, from this campaign, maybe lost a lot. And the next elections will show that the Israelis are fed up with both his manipulation, his tricks, his shticks and his endurance. That’s, if you ask me, the very last couple of months of his.’ -Former Israeli Knesset Speaker and former Acting President of Israel Avraham Burg Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇
1:50

🚨Former Israeli Acting President: ‘Trump needed a SHORT WAR, Netanyahu needed a LONG WAR against Iran. Netanyahu hasn’t profited A THING politically from this war on Iran!’ ‘This war with Iran was a competition between two end dates. Trump had to end it and to finish it before it has an impact on the midterm elections, and therefore it should have been a very short exercise or a manoeuvre. And Netanyahu has to extend it as long as possible because he wants to go into elections in a state of war, because Israelis, when there is a state of war, usually rally around the flag of the government and the flag of the prime minister. So the motivation of what is the role of the war for the internal politics was very different in American internal politics and the Israeli domestic one. It looks to me that, as for now, Netanyahu did not profit a thing politically, internally, from this campaign, maybe lost a lot. And the next elections will show that the Israelis are fed up with both his manipulation, his tricks, his shticks and his endurance. That’s, if you ask me, the very last couple of months of his.’ -Former Israeli Knesset Speaker and former Acting President of Israel Avraham Burg Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Going Underground

33,850 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨 Joe Kent thinks Trump’s best move now is to work with Iran and Oman to keep the Strait of Hormuz open His logic is that if traffic flows get back to normal, Iran has far more incentive to focus on getting their assets unfrozen, rather than shutting it down again "If we lean heavily on our economic tools and really just focus on getting the Strait open first and foremost, then we can come back and address the rest of the MOU. But instead we've gone and cut this other side deal in Lebanon, knowing that Lebanon is a hot button issue that we really don't have a lot of control over." Joe Kent
2:57

🚨 Joe Kent thinks Trump’s best move now is to work with Iran and Oman to keep the Strait of Hormuz open His logic is that if traffic flows get back to normal, Iran has far more incentive to focus on getting their assets unfrozen, rather than shutting it down again "If we lean heavily on our economic tools and really just focus on getting the Strait open first and foremost, then we can come back and address the rest of the MOU. But instead we've gone and cut this other side deal in Lebanon, knowing that Lebanon is a hot button issue that we really don't have a lot of control over." Joe Kent

Mario Nawfal

102,617 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

GET READY FOR WAR 🇮🇷🇴🇲 Trump Threatens to BLOW UP Oman. Says NO MONEY, NO SANCTIONS, NO Hormuz for Iran and Oman According to this Iran is getting NOTHING. What is the point of making a deal if you get nothing. There was a deal on the table a few days ago. Netanyahu was NOT HAPPY. Now Trump is blowing up the deal with terms no one with a brain will accept. Ben Gvir SAID IT out loud, they will NOT ALLOW Trump to make a deal Israel's government does not like.
1:08

GET READY FOR WAR 🇮🇷🇴🇲 Trump Threatens to BLOW UP Oman. Says NO MONEY, NO SANCTIONS, NO Hormuz for Iran and Oman According to this Iran is getting NOTHING. What is the point of making a deal if you get nothing. There was a deal on the table a few days ago. Netanyahu was NOT HAPPY. Now Trump is blowing up the deal with terms no one with a brain will accept. Ben Gvir SAID IT out loud, they will NOT ALLOW Trump to make a deal Israel's government does not like.

Ryan Rozbiani

99,419 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Israeli-British Historian Prof. Avi Shlaim: ‘The Trump-Netanyahu war on Iran is one of the most UNJUSTIFIED, SENSELESS and FOOLISH wars of the 21st century. There was absolutely no reason to go to war. This is an unlawful war. There was no Security Council resolution that mandated a war on Iran. There was no imminent threat from Iran to either Israel or America. So it was a decision taken by these two leaders to launch an attack on Iran. And the dominant personality here is Netanyahu. He’s the junior partner, but he’s the real architect of this war. He succeeded in dragging America into the war on Iran. And remember that Netanyahu was first elected as prime minister in 1996. For the last 30 years, Netanyahu has been demonising Iran and calling for a military strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities. But no American president until Trump was stupid enough to fall for it. Now, Trump went along with this plan by Netanyahu, and we have seen the consequences. It’s been a war that has caused immense damage and destruction, inflicted a lot of suffering on civilians, and not just in Iran, but on Lebanon as well. And at the same time, Israel continues the genocide in Gaza and the ethnic cleansing of the West Bank. So what we are seeing is an Israeli success in dragging America into a war which is damaging to America, damaging to America’s Gulf allies, hugely damaging to the international economy, and undermines international law.’ -Prof. Avi Shlaim, Emeritus Professor of International Relations at the University of Oxford Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇
3:06

Israeli-British Historian Prof. Avi Shlaim: ‘The Trump-Netanyahu war on Iran is one of the most UNJUSTIFIED, SENSELESS and FOOLISH wars of the 21st century. There was absolutely no reason to go to war. This is an unlawful war. There was no Security Council resolution that mandated a war on Iran. There was no imminent threat from Iran to either Israel or America. So it was a decision taken by these two leaders to launch an attack on Iran. And the dominant personality here is Netanyahu. He’s the junior partner, but he’s the real architect of this war. He succeeded in dragging America into the war on Iran. And remember that Netanyahu was first elected as prime minister in 1996. For the last 30 years, Netanyahu has been demonising Iran and calling for a military strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities. But no American president until Trump was stupid enough to fall for it. Now, Trump went along with this plan by Netanyahu, and we have seen the consequences. It’s been a war that has caused immense damage and destruction, inflicted a lot of suffering on civilians, and not just in Iran, but on Lebanon as well. And at the same time, Israel continues the genocide in Gaza and the ethnic cleansing of the West Bank. So what we are seeing is an Israeli success in dragging America into a war which is damaging to America, damaging to America’s Gulf allies, hugely damaging to the international economy, and undermines international law.’ -Prof. Avi Shlaim, Emeritus Professor of International Relations at the University of Oxford Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Going Underground

32,717 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🇺🇸🇮🇷The White House was telling everyone a deal was 24h away. Then Trump posted a bomb with his signature on it "95% of a deal" on the table and nobody in Washington can get their story straight for a single news cycle Iran is watching all of this too...
2:27

🇺🇸🇮🇷The White House was telling everyone a deal was 24h away. Then Trump posted a bomb with his signature on it "95% of a deal" on the table and nobody in Washington can get their story straight for a single news cycle Iran is watching all of this too...

Mario Nawfal

209,456 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🇺🇸🇮🇷 A presidential order to drop a tactical nuke on Iran would be legal, and the military would carry it out. Fmr. U.S. National Counterterrorism Center director Joe Kent says a strike on a military target in a country America is at war with clears the UCMJ bar easily, and the circle making the call has stayed small enough that it may never leak: "I'm surprised more people haven't resigned." His frustration runs deeper than the war itself, since the president keeps taking advice from the same people who delivered him into it. Joe Kent
2:59

🇺🇸🇮🇷 A presidential order to drop a tactical nuke on Iran would be legal, and the military would carry it out. Fmr. U.S. National Counterterrorism Center director Joe Kent says a strike on a military target in a country America is at war with clears the UCMJ bar easily, and the circle making the call has stayed small enough that it may never leak: "I'm surprised more people haven't resigned." His frustration runs deeper than the war itself, since the president keeps taking advice from the same people who delivered him into it. Joe Kent

Mario Nawfal

20,543 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

#WATCH | Evian, France: US President Donald Trump says, "Without the United States, there would be no Israel. Without me, there would be no Israel because no other president was willing to do what I did. I've had a great relationship with Bibi, but now Bibi has to be more responsible with respect to Lebanon. Lebanon used to be a great country. It was a country where you had professors, doctors, and lawyers. Now it's just terrible. I'm not happy with the way Israel has handled itself with Lebanon and with Hezbollah. They should have been able to do this job faster. It just goes on forever. And when that happens, it throws a negative light on the big deal, and that's the deal with Iran. So, when you ask me about Bibi, an unbelievable relationship. But Israel would have been blown up a long time ago had I not gotten involved...This deal is a wall to a nuclear weapon. His (Barack Obama's) deal was a road to nuclear weapon. Bibi, I remember very well, Bibi came to Washington and begged, he begged Obama not to make that deal. And Obama was on the side of Iran, not Israel. And he made the deal. That deal was a disaster. I terminated that deal..." (Source: White House)
4:26

#WATCH | Evian, France: US President Donald Trump says, "Without the United States, there would be no Israel. Without me, there would be no Israel because no other president was willing to do what I did. I've had a great relationship with Bibi, but now Bibi has to be more responsible with respect to Lebanon. Lebanon used to be a great country. It was a country where you had professors, doctors, and lawyers. Now it's just terrible. I'm not happy with the way Israel has handled itself with Lebanon and with Hezbollah. They should have been able to do this job faster. It just goes on forever. And when that happens, it throws a negative light on the big deal, and that's the deal with Iran. So, when you ask me about Bibi, an unbelievable relationship. But Israel would have been blown up a long time ago had I not gotten involved...This deal is a wall to a nuclear weapon. His (Barack Obama's) deal was a road to nuclear weapon. Bibi, I remember very well, Bibi came to Washington and begged, he begged Obama not to make that deal. And Obama was on the side of Iran, not Israel. And he made the deal. That deal was a disaster. I terminated that deal..." (Source: White House)

ANI

101,753 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Israeli-British Historian Prof. Avi Shlaim: ‘The Trump-Netanyahu war on Iran is one of the most UNJUSTIFIED, SENSELESS and FOOLISH wars of the 21st century. There was absolutely no reason to go to war. This is an unlawful war. There was no Security Council resolution that mandated a war on Iran. There was no imminent threat from Iran to either Israel or America. So it was a decision taken by these two leaders to launch an attack on Iran. And the dominant personality here is Netanyahu. He’s the junior partner, but he’s the real architect of this war. He succeeded in dragging America into the war on Iran. And remember that Netanyahu was first elected as prime minister in 1996. For the last 30 years, Netanyahu has been demonising Iran and calling for a military strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities. But no American president until Trump was stupid enough to fall for it. Now, Trump went along with this plan by Netanyahu, and we have seen the consequences. It’s been a war that has caused immense damage and destruction, inflicted a lot of suffering on civilians, and not just in Iran, but on Lebanon as well. And at the same time, Israel continues the genocide in Gaza and the ethnic cleansing of the West Bank. So what we are seeing is an Israeli success in dragging America into a war which is damaging to America, damaging to America’s Gulf allies, hugely damaging to the international economy, and undermines international law.’ -Prof. Avi Shlaim, Emeritus Professor of International Relations at the University of Oxford, on Going Underground
3:06

Israeli-British Historian Prof. Avi Shlaim: ‘The Trump-Netanyahu war on Iran is one of the most UNJUSTIFIED, SENSELESS and FOOLISH wars of the 21st century. There was absolutely no reason to go to war. This is an unlawful war. There was no Security Council resolution that mandated a war on Iran. There was no imminent threat from Iran to either Israel or America. So it was a decision taken by these two leaders to launch an attack on Iran. And the dominant personality here is Netanyahu. He’s the junior partner, but he’s the real architect of this war. He succeeded in dragging America into the war on Iran. And remember that Netanyahu was first elected as prime minister in 1996. For the last 30 years, Netanyahu has been demonising Iran and calling for a military strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities. But no American president until Trump was stupid enough to fall for it. Now, Trump went along with this plan by Netanyahu, and we have seen the consequences. It’s been a war that has caused immense damage and destruction, inflicted a lot of suffering on civilians, and not just in Iran, but on Lebanon as well. And at the same time, Israel continues the genocide in Gaza and the ethnic cleansing of the West Bank. So what we are seeing is an Israeli success in dragging America into a war which is damaging to America, damaging to America’s Gulf allies, hugely damaging to the international economy, and undermines international law.’ -Prof. Avi Shlaim, Emeritus Professor of International Relations at the University of Oxford, on Going Underground

Going Underground

22,956 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🇺🇸🇮🇷 How close are we to American boots on Iranian soil? Trump: "Sometimes you need a ground campaign, but we have other people that will do the ground campaign for us." Joe Kent, who resigned from the administration over this war, thinks the ground option is in play. His read: with the diplomatic track dead, the military has already started the groundwork so the choice is ready the moment the order comes. So who are the "other people"? Joe sees nobody who can actually carry it. If meaningful boots go in, they will be AMERICAN boots, and the first casualties start what he calls a blood debt that locks Washington in for years. It gets darker. He laid out why any plan built to truly topple Tehran reaches nuclear weapons with frightening speed, right as Netanyahu resurfaced at Dimona for his first publicized visit in nearly a decade. He was dead serious about where it ends if nobody hits the brakes: an Israeli nuke and an American shrug. The exit still exists. In his eyes Trump is the one president who could declare victory tomorrow, leave, and keep his base. Would that base really punish him for taking the win? Joe Kent
43:44

🇺🇸🇮🇷 How close are we to American boots on Iranian soil? Trump: "Sometimes you need a ground campaign, but we have other people that will do the ground campaign for us." Joe Kent, who resigned from the administration over this war, thinks the ground option is in play. His read: with the diplomatic track dead, the military has already started the groundwork so the choice is ready the moment the order comes. So who are the "other people"? Joe sees nobody who can actually carry it. If meaningful boots go in, they will be AMERICAN boots, and the first casualties start what he calls a blood debt that locks Washington in for years. It gets darker. He laid out why any plan built to truly topple Tehran reaches nuclear weapons with frightening speed, right as Netanyahu resurfaced at Dimona for his first publicized visit in nearly a decade. He was dead serious about where it ends if nobody hits the brakes: an Israeli nuke and an American shrug. The exit still exists. In his eyes Trump is the one president who could declare victory tomorrow, leave, and keep his base. Would that base really punish him for taking the win? Joe Kent

Mario Nawfal

325,672 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Trump just turned on Netanyahu, and Alex Jones argues the shift is real, but the reasons behind it are darker and more dangerous than almost anyone is saying... In this conversation, Alex makes his case that Trump was manipulated into the war with false intelligence promising the Iranian regime would collapse in 4 days, and that once it backfired on the economy and his midterm numbers, he started hunting for an exit ramp that Israel keeps blocking. He points to JD Vance, Tulsi Gabbard, and Joe Kent warning against the war from the start, and to the 2027 NDAA provision merging the US and Israeli militaries as the line that finally snapped. The part that will get the most attention is his theory on the leverage. Alex doesn't think Trump is simply blackmailed over Epstein. His more provocative claim is that Trump tied himself into that network for power and survival, and is now enraged that the people he partnered with refuse to take orders. He also gets into Ben-Gvir's "all of Lebanon must burn" rhetoric, the positioning of Marco Rubio as the next pro-Israel favorite, and his fear of a major provocation designed to keep America in the war. His warning is one I keep hearing: a cornered Likud is at its most dangerous, and Israel is gambling everything on keeping the US in this fight. Alex Jones
1:02:05

Trump just turned on Netanyahu, and Alex Jones argues the shift is real, but the reasons behind it are darker and more dangerous than almost anyone is saying... In this conversation, Alex makes his case that Trump was manipulated into the war with false intelligence promising the Iranian regime would collapse in 4 days, and that once it backfired on the economy and his midterm numbers, he started hunting for an exit ramp that Israel keeps blocking. He points to JD Vance, Tulsi Gabbard, and Joe Kent warning against the war from the start, and to the 2027 NDAA provision merging the US and Israeli militaries as the line that finally snapped. The part that will get the most attention is his theory on the leverage. Alex doesn't think Trump is simply blackmailed over Epstein. His more provocative claim is that Trump tied himself into that network for power and survival, and is now enraged that the people he partnered with refuse to take orders. He also gets into Ben-Gvir's "all of Lebanon must burn" rhetoric, the positioning of Marco Rubio as the next pro-Israel favorite, and his fear of a major provocation designed to keep America in the war. His warning is one I keep hearing: a cornered Likud is at its most dangerous, and Israel is gambling everything on keeping the US in this fight. Alex Jones

Mario Nawfal

777,532 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

NO WAYYY Joe Rogan just described this on his show: A non-commissioned officer attended a military readiness briefing on the Iran war. A high-level commander told the room: don’t worry — Trump is anointed by Jesus Christ to bring back the return on Earth. To justify the Iran attacks. Rogan said it on camera. We cannot independently verify what was said in that briefing room. But we can verify this: Trump’s “spiritual leader” Robert Morris was sentenced to 6 months for sexually abusing a 12-year-old. Hegseth told his son Americans died to stop a nuclear Iran that didn’t exist. Joe Kent confirmed there was no nuclear threat. No intelligence. No justification. The war was started on a feeling. If it’s also being justified in briefing rooms as divine mandate — That is not a military strategy. That is a crusade. Never stop connecting the dots.
1:13

NO WAYYY Joe Rogan just described this on his show: A non-commissioned officer attended a military readiness briefing on the Iran war. A high-level commander told the room: don’t worry — Trump is anointed by Jesus Christ to bring back the return on Earth. To justify the Iran attacks. Rogan said it on camera. We cannot independently verify what was said in that briefing room. But we can verify this: Trump’s “spiritual leader” Robert Morris was sentenced to 6 months for sexually abusing a 12-year-old. Hegseth told his son Americans died to stop a nuclear Iran that didn’t exist. Joe Kent confirmed there was no nuclear threat. No intelligence. No justification. The war was started on a feeling. If it’s also being justified in briefing rooms as divine mandate — That is not a military strategy. That is a crusade. Never stop connecting the dots.

Brian Allen

732,251 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🇮🇷 Iran can't accept a deal that puts Hormuz back the way it was, even with sanctions relief on the table. Geopolitics expert Brandon Weichert explains the trap Tehran built for itself by making resistance the center of its image: "If the pressure of the war is lifted and everything goes back to the way it was before the war, a lot of Iranians might be sitting there going, what the hell was this all for?" The regime needs something tangible to show for the damage, which is why a tolling system keeps coming back to the table. Brandon Weichert
3:35

🇮🇷 Iran can't accept a deal that puts Hormuz back the way it was, even with sanctions relief on the table. Geopolitics expert Brandon Weichert explains the trap Tehran built for itself by making resistance the center of its image: "If the pressure of the war is lifted and everything goes back to the way it was before the war, a lot of Iranians might be sitting there going, what the hell was this all for?" The regime needs something tangible to show for the damage, which is why a tolling system keeps coming back to the table. Brandon Weichert

Mario Nawfal

62,318 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen

🇺🇸 🇮🇷 The security card the U.S. held over Iran for 40 years just stopped working. Joe Kent, former director of the National Counterterrorism Center, says Iran won strategically. The myth of American rescue is over. Israel was punching out of its weight class because of U.S. backing, and that backing just got tested. He says Trump can still turn it into a win with a historic Iran deal. But getting involved in disarming Hezbollah? That's a trap. The real threat to America isn't over there. It's the 18,000 people with terrorist ties the Biden administration let cross the border. Joe Kent
14:37

🇺🇸 🇮🇷 The security card the U.S. held over Iran for 40 years just stopped working. Joe Kent, former director of the National Counterterrorism Center, says Iran won strategically. The myth of American rescue is over. Israel was punching out of its weight class because of U.S. backing, and that backing just got tested. He says Trump can still turn it into a win with a historic Iran deal. But getting involved in disarming Hezbollah? That's a trap. The real threat to America isn't over there. It's the 18,000 people with terrorist ties the Biden administration let cross the border. Joe Kent

Mario Nawfal

36,359 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Malcolm Nance kept coming back to one word: DECOUPLED. And once he explained it, the whole picture clicked into place. His read is that Trump's U-turn was never about morality or turning on Israel. It was pure economic desperation. Trump admitted it himself at the G7, that the US was four weeks from an oil-driven economic collapse. Malcolm, an intelligence veteran, called that Trump's black hole moment, the confession he'd avoided for three weeks. But here's the dangerous part. While Trump scrambled to sign his deal, Netanyahu formally decoupled Israel's military strategy from the United States. Trump can threaten his career, dangle the Epstein files, drop him in the polls, 46 points in Israel in three weeks, and it doesn't matter. On Lebanon, Trump no longer controls him. "All of Lebanon must burn" and the leveling of every border village is what decoupling looks like in practice The chilling implication Malcolm raised? A decoupled Israel could try to assassinate Mojtaba Khamenei at his own father's funeral, without waiting for a US green light. Malcolm Nance
44:17

Malcolm Nance kept coming back to one word: DECOUPLED. And once he explained it, the whole picture clicked into place. His read is that Trump's U-turn was never about morality or turning on Israel. It was pure economic desperation. Trump admitted it himself at the G7, that the US was four weeks from an oil-driven economic collapse. Malcolm, an intelligence veteran, called that Trump's black hole moment, the confession he'd avoided for three weeks. But here's the dangerous part. While Trump scrambled to sign his deal, Netanyahu formally decoupled Israel's military strategy from the United States. Trump can threaten his career, dangle the Epstein files, drop him in the polls, 46 points in Israel in three weeks, and it doesn't matter. On Lebanon, Trump no longer controls him. "All of Lebanon must burn" and the leveling of every border village is what decoupling looks like in practice The chilling implication Malcolm raised? A decoupled Israel could try to assassinate Mojtaba Khamenei at his own father's funeral, without waiting for a US green light. Malcolm Nance

Mario Nawfal

413,501 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten