Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

The jewish Modus Operandi:🧵 Orchestrated Diversity: Systematically import a "diverse" population into historically White nations through a sophisticated and well-funded political and organizational apparatus. Once the demographic shift is underway, they exploit the inevitable tensions that arise, such as the presence of arabs targeting jews. This is then weaponized... to push for draconian policies that restrict freedoms for the entire population, despite the targeted group being only a tiny percentage. The narrative shifts from "diversity is our strength" to "diversity is a threat," but only when it serves their interests. Anti-White Propaganda: Relentlessly promote anti-White narratives through media, education, and cultural institutions. White identity is vilified as inherently oppressive, while every other identity is celebrated as virtuous and worthy of protection. Simultaneously, they cloak themselves in Whiteness when convenient, exploiting its privileges while undermining its foundations. This duality allows them to benefit from White societal structures while actively working to dismantle them. For example, they advocate for "equity" policies that disproportionately harm White populations while insulating themselves from the consequences by later abandoning the identification. Victimhood and Manipulation: When faced with resistance or criticism from White populations, they adopt a posture of victimhood, portraying themselves as persecuted despite their disproportionate influence in media, finance, and politics. This tactic is used to deflect accountability and silence dissent. For instance, any critique of their actions is labeled as "anti-Semitism," effectively shutting down debate and ensuring their agenda remains unchallenged. This strategy is so effective that even the slightest pushback is framed as an existential threat, further entrenching their control. Geopolitical Hypocrisy: While actively working to erode Western values and traditions, they paradoxically advocate for aggression against Eastern nations, framing them as the true threat to the West. This duality serves to distract from their own role in the destruction of Western civilization while advancing their global agenda. For example, they may push for sanctions or military action against countries like Iran, Russia or China, claiming these nations are undermining democracy, while simultaneously promoting policies that weaken Western sovereignty and cultural cohesion.show more

VΩX

40,871 subscribers

50,577 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Zionists use the Holocaust for their own benefit. They don't care about the Jews. They have weaponized anti-Semitism. They immediately threaten anyone who is hostile to the Zionists as an anti-Semite, but the funny thing is that they do not even believe in Judaism while doing this, their only goal is their political agenda. All Zionist lobbies and so-called Anti-Semitism organizations do is to protect Zionism. They do not fight against antisemitism.

Zionists use the Holocaust for their own benefit. They don't care about the Jews. They have weaponized anti-Semitism. They immediately threaten anyone who is hostile to the Zionists as an anti-Semite, but the funny thing is that they do not even believe in Judaism while doing this, their only goal is their political agenda. All Zionist lobbies and so-called Anti-Semitism organizations do is to protect Zionism. They do not fight against antisemitism.

Voice of Rabbis

135,959 views • 2 years ago

When the left speaks of inclusion and tolerance, they mean everything except Christianity and white people. Their hatred for white people largely stems from the fact that Europeans spread Christianity and built Western civilization for nearly two thousand years. This is why they downplay grooming gangs that target white girls while obsessing over any perceived slight against other groups. They force gay symbols on everyone but punish Christians for simply wearing a Bible verse or refusing to affirm what contradicts their faith. It is not just politics. It is a spiritual war against Christ and His people. We must stop pretending otherwise.

When the left speaks of inclusion and tolerance, they mean everything except Christianity and white people. Their hatred for white people largely stems from the fact that Europeans spread Christianity and built Western civilization for nearly two thousand years. This is why they downplay grooming gangs that target white girls while obsessing over any perceived slight against other groups. They force gay symbols on everyone but punish Christians for simply wearing a Bible verse or refusing to affirm what contradicts their faith. It is not just politics. It is a spiritual war against Christ and His people. We must stop pretending otherwise.

Kangmin Lee | 이강민

11,341 views • 1 month ago

WESTERN TYPE OF ELECTIONS ARE NOW IN GRAVE JEOPARDY in southern African countries with a history of white settler colonialism or apartheid rule. This is because white monopoly interests in the region that are rooted in British and Portuguese white settler colonialism or apartheid rule - represented by white led organisations like the Brenthurst Foundation of the Oppenheimers - have identified elections as the new and most convenient battle ground for destabilising or toppling governing former liberation movements. Their new strategy is three-pronged: (i) they sponsor parties that they hope might win, as they did last month in Namibia; (ii) if their sponsored party loses, they fund their running dogs to dispute the results by challenging them in or outside the courts to delegitimatise the victory of the governing former liberation movement that would have won the election; again, as is the ongoing case in Namibia; or, (iii) if the country in question is fragile and has simmering or open violent conflict, as for example is the case with conflict-ridden Mozambique; they fund their running dogs to dispute the election results violently, and they use that violence to demand negotiations for a coalition or 'unity' government; with claims that the whole region will burn and South Africa will suffer the most from a refugee influx, if this does not happen. It is for this reason that elections in the southern African countries that suffered white settler colonialism or apartheid are no longer a democratic contest, but have become a clear and present national security danger; bordering on an existential threat. As a result, the state of democratic elections in the region has now reached another level!

WESTERN TYPE OF ELECTIONS ARE NOW IN GRAVE JEOPARDY in southern African countries with a history of white settler colonialism or apartheid rule. This is because white monopoly interests in the region that are rooted in British and Portuguese white settler colonialism or apartheid rule - represented by white led organisations like the Brenthurst Foundation of the Oppenheimers - have identified elections as the new and most convenient battle ground for destabilising or toppling governing former liberation movements. Their new strategy is three-pronged: (i) they sponsor parties that they hope might win, as they did last month in Namibia; (ii) if their sponsored party loses, they fund their running dogs to dispute the results by challenging them in or outside the courts to delegitimatise the victory of the governing former liberation movement that would have won the election; again, as is the ongoing case in Namibia; or, (iii) if the country in question is fragile and has simmering or open violent conflict, as for example is the case with conflict-ridden Mozambique; they fund their running dogs to dispute the election results violently, and they use that violence to demand negotiations for a coalition or 'unity' government; with claims that the whole region will burn and South Africa will suffer the most from a refugee influx, if this does not happen. It is for this reason that elections in the southern African countries that suffered white settler colonialism or apartheid are no longer a democratic contest, but have become a clear and present national security danger; bordering on an existential threat. As a result, the state of democratic elections in the region has now reached another level!

Prof Jonathan Moyo

89,583 views • 1 year ago

At the Munich Security Conference, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio delivered a blunt message that stunned many European leaders. America still belongs to the West, he said, but it will no longer carry the full burden while Europe systematically weakens itself from within. He called for the return of power, pride, and sovereignty to Western nations. Predictably, the reaction was fury. Critics immediately labeled the entire worldview “white supremacy” and claimed that any call to preserve Western culture and identity is Islamophobic and xenophobic. The accusation itself reveals the problem. Promoting patriotism and the right of Western peoples to maintain their own civilization is treated as moral failure, while the ideologies actively eroding that civilization are protected from scrutiny. What is your take? Do you agree with Rubio’s statements?

At the Munich Security Conference, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio delivered a blunt message that stunned many European leaders. America still belongs to the West, he said, but it will no longer carry the full burden while Europe systematically weakens itself from within. He called for the return of power, pride, and sovereignty to Western nations. Predictably, the reaction was fury. Critics immediately labeled the entire worldview “white supremacy” and claimed that any call to preserve Western culture and identity is Islamophobic and xenophobic. The accusation itself reveals the problem. Promoting patriotism and the right of Western peoples to maintain their own civilization is treated as moral failure, while the ideologies actively eroding that civilization are protected from scrutiny. What is your take? Do you agree with Rubio’s statements?

Liza Rosen

12,812 views • 18 days ago

Politicians cant win over ethnic voters as they can Whites with policies that are generally perceived as good for the entire nation/masses so they instead resort to these charades because non-Whites vote in the immediate interest of their race supra the country. They have no natural connection to the flag/constitution etc and quietly see White nations as an ‘other’ to be plundered. Additionally they have not had their racial loyalty beat out of them with a lifetime of propaganda as Whites have, which is why politicians are green lit to appeal to ethnics as egregiously as this without losing White (their core constituency) votes. Essentially, multiculturalism turns elections into an ethnic headcount where the winner gets to import more of themselves and White people aren’t allowed to participate.

Politicians cant win over ethnic voters as they can Whites with policies that are generally perceived as good for the entire nation/masses so they instead resort to these charades because non-Whites vote in the immediate interest of their race supra the country. They have no natural connection to the flag/constitution etc and quietly see White nations as an ‘other’ to be plundered. Additionally they have not had their racial loyalty beat out of them with a lifetime of propaganda as Whites have, which is why politicians are green lit to appeal to ethnics as egregiously as this without losing White (their core constituency) votes. Essentially, multiculturalism turns elections into an ethnic headcount where the winner gets to import more of themselves and White people aren’t allowed to participate.

auspill

11,466 views • 1 month ago

Since this bigot, cosplaying as a preacher, came for my denomination, the Church Of God In Christ, my leader, Bishop J. Drew Sheard, and the Black church in general, let me offer this saved, sanctified, Holy Ghost filled clap back to his racist, hypocritical temper tantrum about Black people not supporting Donald Trump. The overwhelming support of white evangelicals for Trump exposes profound hypocrisy within their political and religious alignment. Trump’s life, actions, and policies are antithetical to the values they profess as Christians. Evangelicals claim to uphold the sanctity of marriage, yet they support a man who has been married three times, each marred by infidelity. They preach family values while endorsing someone who paid porn stars and has been accused of sexual misconduct by over two dozen women. The Bible condemns lying, yet Donald Trump is a documented pathological liar, spreading falsehoods with impunity. Furthermore, Trump’s policies on immigration and refugees fly in the face of biblical teachings to care for the stranger and the oppressed. White evangelicals, however, have largely backed his xenophobic agenda, turning a blind eye to the suffering of immigrants and asylum seekers. The Bible calls believers to take care of the poor and marginalized, but evangelicals champion policies that cut social safety nets and disproportionately harm the most vulnerable. Their hypocrisy is not new. Historically, white evangelicals have misused the Bible to justify heinous acts. They were key supporters of slavery, using scripture to rationalize the subjugation, rape, and murder of Black people. Their legacy includes defending segregation, opposing civil rights, and today, embracing a political agenda that harms the poor, immigrants, Black people, and other non white people. White evangelical support for Trump is simply the latest chapter in their long history of aligning with what the Bible itself calls wickedness. They have a history of supporting violence, exploitation, rape, murder, theft, and colonization, all while claiming to be followers of Christ. Whit evangelicals have justified these acts through a twisted interpretation of scripture, portraying violent subjugation as ordained by God. The practice of buck breaking—where enslaved Black men were sexually assaulted by white slaveholders to break their spirit—was another horrifying act that many evangelicals tacitly endorsed. Despite their vocal condemnation of homosexuality, they ignored the rampant sexual abuse and exploitation committed by white men in these horrific acts. White evangelicals also supported the genocide and displacement of Indigenous people, rationalizing the theft of land as part of a divine mandate. The so-called “Manifest Destiny” was framed as God’s will, with no regard for the Indigenous lives destroyed in the process. They stood behind policies that sanctioned murder and violence to fulfill this colonial ambition, all while calling themselves defenders of Christian values. Today, this legacy of supporting violence and oppression persists in their support for preemptive strikes and military interventions that result in the deaths of civilians around the world. In Gaza, they stand behind the indiscriminate bombing and killing of Palestinian civilians, justifying it under the guise of political necessity or even biblical prophecy. Their alignment with these actions mirrors their historical support for the murder of enslaved Black people, the theft of Indigenous land, and the sexual violence of buck breaking. The evangelical church’s selective morality—opposing certain sins like abortion or homosexuality while embracing mass violence, exploitation, and white supremacy—reveals a deep hypocrisy and exposes the fact that their allegiance is to power and racial domination, not to the gospel they claim to follow. 🎤

Since this bigot, cosplaying as a preacher, came for my denomination, the Church Of God In Christ, my leader, Bishop J. Drew Sheard, and the Black church in general, let me offer this saved, sanctified, Holy Ghost filled clap back to his racist, hypocritical temper tantrum about Black people not supporting Donald Trump. The overwhelming support of white evangelicals for Trump exposes profound hypocrisy within their political and religious alignment. Trump’s life, actions, and policies are antithetical to the values they profess as Christians. Evangelicals claim to uphold the sanctity of marriage, yet they support a man who has been married three times, each marred by infidelity. They preach family values while endorsing someone who paid porn stars and has been accused of sexual misconduct by over two dozen women. The Bible condemns lying, yet Donald Trump is a documented pathological liar, spreading falsehoods with impunity. Furthermore, Trump’s policies on immigration and refugees fly in the face of biblical teachings to care for the stranger and the oppressed. White evangelicals, however, have largely backed his xenophobic agenda, turning a blind eye to the suffering of immigrants and asylum seekers. The Bible calls believers to take care of the poor and marginalized, but evangelicals champion policies that cut social safety nets and disproportionately harm the most vulnerable. Their hypocrisy is not new. Historically, white evangelicals have misused the Bible to justify heinous acts. They were key supporters of slavery, using scripture to rationalize the subjugation, rape, and murder of Black people. Their legacy includes defending segregation, opposing civil rights, and today, embracing a political agenda that harms the poor, immigrants, Black people, and other non white people. White evangelical support for Trump is simply the latest chapter in their long history of aligning with what the Bible itself calls wickedness. They have a history of supporting violence, exploitation, rape, murder, theft, and colonization, all while claiming to be followers of Christ. Whit evangelicals have justified these acts through a twisted interpretation of scripture, portraying violent subjugation as ordained by God. The practice of buck breaking—where enslaved Black men were sexually assaulted by white slaveholders to break their spirit—was another horrifying act that many evangelicals tacitly endorsed. Despite their vocal condemnation of homosexuality, they ignored the rampant sexual abuse and exploitation committed by white men in these horrific acts. White evangelicals also supported the genocide and displacement of Indigenous people, rationalizing the theft of land as part of a divine mandate. The so-called “Manifest Destiny” was framed as God’s will, with no regard for the Indigenous lives destroyed in the process. They stood behind policies that sanctioned murder and violence to fulfill this colonial ambition, all while calling themselves defenders of Christian values. Today, this legacy of supporting violence and oppression persists in their support for preemptive strikes and military interventions that result in the deaths of civilians around the world. In Gaza, they stand behind the indiscriminate bombing and killing of Palestinian civilians, justifying it under the guise of political necessity or even biblical prophecy. Their alignment with these actions mirrors their historical support for the murder of enslaved Black people, the theft of Indigenous land, and the sexual violence of buck breaking. The evangelical church’s selective morality—opposing certain sins like abortion or homosexuality while embracing mass violence, exploitation, and white supremacy—reveals a deep hypocrisy and exposes the fact that their allegiance is to power and racial domination, not to the gospel they claim to follow. 🎤

Bishop Talbert Swan

379,363 views • 1 year ago

It's astonishing that a primitive terrorist organisation managed to convince hordes of gullible dimwits around the world that they are “freedom fighters.” How do the keffiyeh wearing, Hamas supporting sheeple in the West explain that Gazans themselves openly admit Hamas, not Israel, is responsible for their suffering? These loud apologists whine about “oppression” while cheering a death cult that slaughters innocents and uses its own people as human shields. And let us not forget that many Gazans are Hamas. They voted for them, elected them, and celebrated their actions. Their misery is as much their own doing as it is Hamas’.

It's astonishing that a primitive terrorist organisation managed to convince hordes of gullible dimwits around the world that they are “freedom fighters.” How do the keffiyeh wearing, Hamas supporting sheeple in the West explain that Gazans themselves openly admit Hamas, not Israel, is responsible for their suffering? These loud apologists whine about “oppression” while cheering a death cult that slaughters innocents and uses its own people as human shields. And let us not forget that many Gazans are Hamas. They voted for them, elected them, and celebrated their actions. Their misery is as much their own doing as it is Hamas’.

𝔸η𝐓

27,219 views • 11 months ago

The ANC is more critical of the ANC than News24 is critical of the ANC. Some in the mainstream media argue that their publications are objective because they sometimes criticise the ANC and the President, as if the ANC and the President don't also criticise their own party. The issue here is that they criticise because they are rooting for it to win, and so they would like us to believe their criticism makes them neutral. While they criticise the party for not succeeding, they have shown themselves to have zero critical thinking when it comes to the assumptions on which the party is built.

The ANC is more critical of the ANC than News24 is critical of the ANC. Some in the mainstream media argue that their publications are objective because they sometimes criticise the ANC and the President, as if the ANC and the President don't also criticise their own party. The issue here is that they criticise because they are rooting for it to win, and so they would like us to believe their criticism makes them neutral. While they criticise the party for not succeeding, they have shown themselves to have zero critical thinking when it comes to the assumptions on which the party is built.

Ernst Roets

38,851 views • 7 months ago

This is the curse of Kenya. I know, first hand, that more than 90% of the white teachers in international schools in Kenya are NOT qualified to teach the subjects they teach, they are there for their colour to fool the rich African parents who are suffering from inferiority complex into paying millions (of Kenyan Shillings) per term for the the same education they themselves got for a pittance. I see politicians, banking tycoons, insurance tycoons etc cowering and looking embarrassingly sheepish as they get progress reports from the white teachers of their children, looking up to them as though they are in the presence of Jesus himself... then they walk arrogantly to us, the African teachers who do the actual work and introduce themselves and listen nonchalantly to whatever we have to say. They then part with their millions in fees, hundreds of thousands for a trip to London for their children and stand in small groups praising the school because it has very many white teachers. In parliament, they block capitation (budget allocation) for public schools. Neocolonialism 👌🏾👌🏾👌🏾

This is the curse of Kenya. I know, first hand, that more than 90% of the white teachers in international schools in Kenya are NOT qualified to teach the subjects they teach, they are there for their colour to fool the rich African parents who are suffering from inferiority complex into paying millions (of Kenyan Shillings) per term for the the same education they themselves got for a pittance. I see politicians, banking tycoons, insurance tycoons etc cowering and looking embarrassingly sheepish as they get progress reports from the white teachers of their children, looking up to them as though they are in the presence of Jesus himself... then they walk arrogantly to us, the African teachers who do the actual work and introduce themselves and listen nonchalantly to whatever we have to say. They then part with their millions in fees, hundreds of thousands for a trip to London for their children and stand in small groups praising the school because it has very many white teachers. In parliament, they block capitation (budget allocation) for public schools. Neocolonialism 👌🏾👌🏾👌🏾

This Is Africa

38,311 views • 4 months ago

#Armed #Migrants This is not a border crisis. This is an armed invasion by proxy. In the migrant camps and beaches of northern France, smugglers and those they traffic openly brandish handguns and weapons of war, filming themselves as they prepare to cross into Britain. These are not desperate families. These are criminal networks treating the English Channel as their highway, while European authorities watch. Guns that surface in Calais today could be on British streets tomorrow. This is how nations lose control of their borders and their safety. The footage is real. The threat is immediate. The time for denial is over. STOP THE BOATS! 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

#Armed #Migrants This is not a border crisis. This is an armed invasion by proxy. In the migrant camps and beaches of northern France, smugglers and those they traffic openly brandish handguns and weapons of war, filming themselves as they prepare to cross into Britain. These are not desperate families. These are criminal networks treating the English Channel as their highway, while European authorities watch. Guns that surface in Calais today could be on British streets tomorrow. This is how nations lose control of their borders and their safety. The footage is real. The threat is immediate. The time for denial is over. STOP THE BOATS! 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

Danny Tommo

164,757 views • 4 months ago

White People are a very small minority in the world People of European ancestry or white people make up roughly 8% of the global population In America: - Minority births already exceeded 50% of US births around 2021–2025 - Whites are projected to fall below 50% of the total US population around 2045 - Gen Z is projected as the last majority-White generation in the US - States like California, Texas, New Mexico, Hawaii and many large cities are already “majority-minority” “Take countries like Ireland or Scotland, where they have only 6 million people or 5 million people respectively, and of that populace, only 4 or 5 million are actually native, white, Irish, or Scottish And now the main sources of immigration to these countries include - India, which has 1.4 billion people - Pakistan, which has 240 million people - Nigeria, which is 220 million people Now, these countries obviously have populations that dwarf European nations, yet the European people are demanded to share their tiny country with them and give them access to their better economies and all of their resources, which should be exclusively reserved for the people who inherited and created these Western societies. These non-white immigrants demand special social privileges. Then they're labeled as minorities, which is a total distortion of reality given their global numbers” “Anybody that defends this is either totally ignorant to the world around them or being subversive and actively trying to destroy the West. We are the global minority”

White People are a very small minority in the world People of European ancestry or white people make up roughly 8% of the global population In America: - Minority births already exceeded 50% of US births around 2021–2025 - Whites are projected to fall below 50% of the total US population around 2045 - Gen Z is projected as the last majority-White generation in the US - States like California, Texas, New Mexico, Hawaii and many large cities are already “majority-minority” “Take countries like Ireland or Scotland, where they have only 6 million people or 5 million people respectively, and of that populace, only 4 or 5 million are actually native, white, Irish, or Scottish And now the main sources of immigration to these countries include - India, which has 1.4 billion people - Pakistan, which has 240 million people - Nigeria, which is 220 million people Now, these countries obviously have populations that dwarf European nations, yet the European people are demanded to share their tiny country with them and give them access to their better economies and all of their resources, which should be exclusively reserved for the people who inherited and created these Western societies. These non-white immigrants demand special social privileges. Then they're labeled as minorities, which is a total distortion of reality given their global numbers” “Anybody that defends this is either totally ignorant to the world around them or being subversive and actively trying to destroy the West. We are the global minority”

Wall Street Apes

38,155 views • 3 months ago

🌐 White people should NEVER support Zionism! Zionists are trying to trick White people into supporting them but they hate White people. Zionism is against Christianity and White people. Zionism is racist to everyone, even White people. Zionism wishes to destroy Islam, Christianity, and every religion not its own. Islam respects Christianity and we are better off as allies with them against Zionism rather than being allies with the Zionists who hate us. They are always using Christians and Muslims to attack each other for their own benefit. No more! Zionists have always hated White people but only now are trying to attract us as allies as they have destroyed everything and are seeking allies for help. Free the entire Middle-East from Zionism, free American politics and media from Zionism, free Europe from Zionist political and media influences, free Africa from Zionist exploitation, and help dismantle the evil empire of Zionism once and for all!

Sensitive content

🌐 White people should NEVER support Zionism! Zionists are trying to trick White people into supporting them but they hate White people. Zionism is against Christianity and White people. Zionism is racist to everyone, even White people. Zionism wishes to destroy Islam, Christianity, and every religion not its own. Islam respects Christianity and we are better off as allies with them against Zionism rather than being allies with the Zionists who hate us. They are always using Christians and Muslims to attack each other for their own benefit. No more! Zionists have always hated White people but only now are trying to attract us as allies as they have destroyed everything and are seeking allies for help. Free the entire Middle-East from Zionism, free American politics and media from Zionism, free Europe from Zionist political and media influences, free Africa from Zionist exploitation, and help dismantle the evil empire of Zionism once and for all!

Erik Warsaw

21,830 views • 1 year ago

The N-word No white person actually wants to say the n-word...publicly. There is no contingent of white people who believe that saying the n-word somehow affirms their First Amendment right. And I won't pretend that it is a thing. Any white person who wants to say it will say it when the cameras are off or on. But in 2026, some whites want to say it only while the cameras are rolling. Why? Because racism is an industry and the n-word is a commodity. It's like an illicit drug whose dealers are white right-wing grifters and black liberals. Those are literally the only groups who care about that word. Everyone else knows how to be a normal civil human being. Only bankrupt whites are dying, say the word. Bankrupt intellectually, morally, and/or financially. When a person struggles intellectually, they tend to struggle financially. And there are interests who finance chaos. Remember George Soros and his reputation for financing discord in nations? There is nothing different here. A poor, struggling white can run to social media with rage bait to make a living while national and foreign interests fund it. Remember when the SPLC was accused of financing the same white supremacist groups they were supposed to be fighting? Outward racism is so uncommon that it needs to be manufactured. The black liberal is unemployed without the racist white. So, it is in his best interest to find and feed into racism. His wallet depends on it. The white racist and the black liberal have a symbiotic relationship. They need each other. Without one, there would be no other. And what do they have in common? A lot! They both identify with their race before their god. They both agree that the white man has all the power. They both believe in race-based employment practices. They both hate black men. And of course, they both use race as a tool to reach a certain level of success. The only thing that separates them is their skin color. Otherwise, you wouldn't be able to tell them apart. What we're seeing is a psychological operation designed to divide and conquer the people. This is the white version of black lives matter. This is the White Lives Matter movement. The financial interests saw how well BLM worked, so they are rebooting the same game plan, but with white people. The white people who are falling for this fall into two categories. Low IQ and grifters. The grifters do not have enough intelligence to get social media engagement from ingenuity and invention, so they pick the low-hanging fruit of rage bait. The low IQ blacks feed into it, and the low IQ whites follow the trend because they see the enormous engagement. However, that engagement isn't real. Those are trolls and bot farms from the same financial interests who wish to see this country divided. A united people are unstoppable, and the financial interests know this. Our politicians, who are fed by the financial interests, know this. Politics runs on problems. But the severe problems are never addressed because the petty ones are kept on the front page. In order to right this ship, we must increase our intelligence. We must learn where to place our focus. And require more from our elected officials and influencers. They runts salivate when the headline reads white vs black. It is a cash event for them. I say, we need to let them starve!

The N-word No white person actually wants to say the n-word...publicly. There is no contingent of white people who believe that saying the n-word somehow affirms their First Amendment right. And I won't pretend that it is a thing. Any white person who wants to say it will say it when the cameras are off or on. But in 2026, some whites want to say it only while the cameras are rolling. Why? Because racism is an industry and the n-word is a commodity. It's like an illicit drug whose dealers are white right-wing grifters and black liberals. Those are literally the only groups who care about that word. Everyone else knows how to be a normal civil human being. Only bankrupt whites are dying, say the word. Bankrupt intellectually, morally, and/or financially. When a person struggles intellectually, they tend to struggle financially. And there are interests who finance chaos. Remember George Soros and his reputation for financing discord in nations? There is nothing different here. A poor, struggling white can run to social media with rage bait to make a living while national and foreign interests fund it. Remember when the SPLC was accused of financing the same white supremacist groups they were supposed to be fighting? Outward racism is so uncommon that it needs to be manufactured. The black liberal is unemployed without the racist white. So, it is in his best interest to find and feed into racism. His wallet depends on it. The white racist and the black liberal have a symbiotic relationship. They need each other. Without one, there would be no other. And what do they have in common? A lot! They both identify with their race before their god. They both agree that the white man has all the power. They both believe in race-based employment practices. They both hate black men. And of course, they both use race as a tool to reach a certain level of success. The only thing that separates them is their skin color. Otherwise, you wouldn't be able to tell them apart. What we're seeing is a psychological operation designed to divide and conquer the people. This is the white version of black lives matter. This is the White Lives Matter movement. The financial interests saw how well BLM worked, so they are rebooting the same game plan, but with white people. The white people who are falling for this fall into two categories. Low IQ and grifters. The grifters do not have enough intelligence to get social media engagement from ingenuity and invention, so they pick the low-hanging fruit of rage bait. The low IQ blacks feed into it, and the low IQ whites follow the trend because they see the enormous engagement. However, that engagement isn't real. Those are trolls and bot farms from the same financial interests who wish to see this country divided. A united people are unstoppable, and the financial interests know this. Our politicians, who are fed by the financial interests, know this. Politics runs on problems. But the severe problems are never addressed because the petty ones are kept on the front page. In order to right this ship, we must increase our intelligence. We must learn where to place our focus. And require more from our elected officials and influencers. They runts salivate when the headline reads white vs black. It is a cash event for them. I say, we need to let them starve!

Hotep Jesus

34,741 views • 3 months ago

Why did they lie for so long about Biden’s mental decline? Bari Weiss: “I think they genuinely feel that Trump is an existential threat to democracy… and so if the option is the unraveling of our democracy or telling a white lie to protect the candidate… then so be it.” Yuval Levin: “They don’t think they’re lying. They understand themselves to be doing something a little more rational and responsible than that. But after a while, you do it long enough, and the fact is, you’re just lying.” Listen to their full conversation on the state of U.S. politics:

Why did they lie for so long about Biden’s mental decline? Bari Weiss: “I think they genuinely feel that Trump is an existential threat to democracy… and so if the option is the unraveling of our democracy or telling a white lie to protect the candidate… then so be it.” Yuval Levin: “They don’t think they’re lying. They understand themselves to be doing something a little more rational and responsible than that. But after a while, you do it long enough, and the fact is, you’re just lying.” Listen to their full conversation on the state of U.S. politics:

Honestly with Bari Weiss

18,884 views • 2 years ago

According to the Palestinians and their supporters, by turning an empty desert land into a thriving city the Jews kicked Arabs out of their homes and displaced them. Here is what the Palestinians don't want you to know: In 1947 the Arabs who did not have a national identity at the time (only during the 1960s they decided to identify themselves as "Palestinians") became victims of their own agenda which was backed by the neighboring Arab countries. They paid a heavy price for their own decision to try and ethnically cleanse the Jews who tried to prevent war and reached out for peace. Many left their homes and others were indeed forced to leave because of the war that the Arabs themselves initiated as they rejected the UN partition plan. The Arabs literally declared that their ultimate goal was not to establish a state but to "push the Jews into the sea". They had the opportunity to establish an Arab state, but they preferred to destroy their neighboring one for being Jewish. The Jewish state won, the Arabs lost but did not learn a lesson and repeated their fatal mistake again and again over the years.

According to the Palestinians and their supporters, by turning an empty desert land into a thriving city the Jews kicked Arabs out of their homes and displaced them. Here is what the Palestinians don't want you to know: In 1947 the Arabs who did not have a national identity at the time (only during the 1960s they decided to identify themselves as "Palestinians") became victims of their own agenda which was backed by the neighboring Arab countries. They paid a heavy price for their own decision to try and ethnically cleanse the Jews who tried to prevent war and reached out for peace. Many left their homes and others were indeed forced to leave because of the war that the Arabs themselves initiated as they rejected the UN partition plan. The Arabs literally declared that their ultimate goal was not to establish a state but to "push the Jews into the sea". They had the opportunity to establish an Arab state, but they preferred to destroy their neighboring one for being Jewish. The Jewish state won, the Arabs lost but did not learn a lesson and repeated their fatal mistake again and again over the years.

Liza Rosen

389,559 views • 2 years ago

Blonde-haired, blue-eyed white people from Ukraine were celebrated for making home-made Molotov cocktails to defend their land, but the brown Arab Muslim, the Iranian, the Afghan, is far too “uncivilised” to have the right to resist. Their resistance is “barbaric” because it comes from an inherently “violent” culture. The selective application of international law and one’s right to defend themselves from illegal occupation and colonial violence has been revealed to be a complete contradiction in the west, and is no doubt infuriating. But we need to also understand how these “resistance” narratives are processed in communities. These narratives do not stay on our screens. They shape how entire communities see themselves. When Indigenous, Black, and other racialised peoples repeatedly see their histories, struggles, cultures, and resistance framed as dangerous, irrational, or inherently violent, many begin to internalise those messages. Some distance themselves from their own identities in search of safety, acceptance, or legitimacy. Others carry a deep, unspoken rage born from exclusion, dispossession, and the constant demand to prove their humanity. When people are disconnected from their roots, denied dignity, and taught to be ashamed of where they come from, they will still search for belonging. It’s a basic human need to feel a sense of community. The question is whether we create spaces that nurture healing, identity, and justice, or leave them vulnerable to finding belonging in places that exploit their pain.

Blonde-haired, blue-eyed white people from Ukraine were celebrated for making home-made Molotov cocktails to defend their land, but the brown Arab Muslim, the Iranian, the Afghan, is far too “uncivilised” to have the right to resist. Their resistance is “barbaric” because it comes from an inherently “violent” culture. The selective application of international law and one’s right to defend themselves from illegal occupation and colonial violence has been revealed to be a complete contradiction in the west, and is no doubt infuriating. But we need to also understand how these “resistance” narratives are processed in communities. These narratives do not stay on our screens. They shape how entire communities see themselves. When Indigenous, Black, and other racialised peoples repeatedly see their histories, struggles, cultures, and resistance framed as dangerous, irrational, or inherently violent, many begin to internalise those messages. Some distance themselves from their own identities in search of safety, acceptance, or legitimacy. Others carry a deep, unspoken rage born from exclusion, dispossession, and the constant demand to prove their humanity. When people are disconnected from their roots, denied dignity, and taught to be ashamed of where they come from, they will still search for belonging. It’s a basic human need to feel a sense of community. The question is whether we create spaces that nurture healing, identity, and justice, or leave them vulnerable to finding belonging in places that exploit their pain.

Dr. Sabreena Ghaffar-Siddiqui

151,595 views • 2 months ago