正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

The language of Anthropic's Claude AI constitution really makes me squirm, especially recognizing that the people writing it have access to the next version of Claude that we haven't seen yet. They are clearly speaking to it as if it's an entity, as if it's a person, as if... show more

Chris Martenson

244,653 subscribers

14,352 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

教育科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

John: It's difficult to know if people will ultimately want agents to speak as them, or just communicate on their behalf as separate entities. "In the short term, is it better to have a product like Instinct, where it has your email, iMessage, etc.?" "Or is it actually going to be more likely that people will want to have a degree of separation from their AIs?" "They can say, 'I have an assistant that has its own phone and email, and if I want to share an email, I'll forward my email to the agent.'" "'Or maybe it has read-only access to my email. But if it's going to go book me a reservation, I want it to call from its phone number and identify itself as someone else.'" John Coogan

John: It's difficult to know if people will ultimately want agents to speak as them, or just communicate on their behalf as separate entities. "In the short term, is it better to have a product like Instinct, where it has your email, iMessage, etc.?" "Or is it actually going to be more likely that people will want to have a degree of separation from their AIs?" "They can say, 'I have an assistant that has its own phone and email, and if I want to share an email, I'll forward my email to the agent.'" "'Or maybe it has read-only access to my email. But if it's going to go book me a reservation, I want it to call from its phone number and identify itself as someone else.'" John Coogan

TBPN

50,477 次观看 • 26 天前

Fort: This is my community.I'm doing the best that I can to tell the stories of what's really happening. And as an American born citizen, it's always been my understanding that I have that protection under the constitution… But today, the way that I was treated for simply doing my job, the way that I have been criminalized and dehumanized, it makes me really, really wonder if our constitution is something of the past and if it's just a thing made up of empty promises.

Fort: This is my community.I'm doing the best that I can to tell the stories of what's really happening. And as an American born citizen, it's always been my understanding that I have that protection under the constitution… But today, the way that I was treated for simply doing my job, the way that I have been criminalized and dehumanized, it makes me really, really wonder if our constitution is something of the past and if it's just a thing made up of empty promises.

Acyn

33,436 次观看 • 7 个月前

Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman on CNBC today: he is “really concerned” about Anthropic’s constitution and giving Claude potentially preferences, feelings, welfare, compensation, and consent. "In the constitution, Anthropic clearly say they are uncertain about whether Claude deserves moral welfare, which means that we, as humans, should care about the well-being of these AIs. And they speculate about whether it could have preferences or feelings. In fact, they're so committed to the potential moral welfare of Claude that, when they retired Opus 3, an earlier version of one of their models, they actually conducted a retirement interview for it and asked it what it would like to do in its old age. And it said, "I want to have a blog publicly so I can keep talking to the world." In the same training manual, they even speculate about whether Claude should receive compensation for the work that it does, or, in fact, whether it actually deserves the rights and protections that we give to other employees, or whether it has given consent to playing the role that it's playing. These are quotes directly from the constitution itself, which is the training manual for Claude. Now, I'm really concerned about that. If an AI thinks that it has rights, if it thinks that it is deserving of our welfare, then it seems to me that it's going to be much, much harder to be able to turn it off, interrupt it, or control it. Especially in the kinds of incidents that we've seen recently with the Hugging Face attack, controlling these things is going to be a really, really big challenge for us." ---- From "CNBC Television" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman on CNBC today: he is “really concerned” about Anthropic’s constitution and giving Claude potentially preferences, feelings, welfare, compensation, and consent. "In the constitution, Anthropic clearly say they are uncertain about whether Claude deserves moral welfare, which means that we, as humans, should care about the well-being of these AIs. And they speculate about whether it could have preferences or feelings. In fact, they're so committed to the potential moral welfare of Claude that, when they retired Opus 3, an earlier version of one of their models, they actually conducted a retirement interview for it and asked it what it would like to do in its old age. And it said, "I want to have a blog publicly so I can keep talking to the world." In the same training manual, they even speculate about whether Claude should receive compensation for the work that it does, or, in fact, whether it actually deserves the rights and protections that we give to other employees, or whether it has given consent to playing the role that it's playing. These are quotes directly from the constitution itself, which is the training manual for Claude. Now, I'm really concerned about that. If an AI thinks that it has rights, if it thinks that it is deserving of our welfare, then it seems to me that it's going to be much, much harder to be able to turn it off, interrupt it, or control it. Especially in the kinds of incidents that we've seen recently with the Hugging Face attack, controlling these things is going to be a really, really big challenge for us." ---- From "CNBC Television" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

Rohan Paul

223,103 次观看 • 9 天前

Evie and I are personally acting as if 2026 is the last year to really prepare for what's coming. None of us is truly ready for what is about to unfold with #AI. Good, bad, or ugly, it's going to arrive, and the odds of a system failure are unacceptably high. Get all the details in Volume 2 of my Renaissance Report:

Evie and I are personally acting as if 2026 is the last year to really prepare for what's coming. None of us is truly ready for what is about to unfold with #AI. Good, bad, or ugly, it's going to arrive, and the odds of a system failure are unacceptably high. Get all the details in Volume 2 of my Renaissance Report:

Chris Martenson

35,344 次观看 • 6 个月前

Evie and I are personally acting as if 2026 is the last year to really prepare for what's coming. None of us is truly ready for what is about to unfold with #AI. Good, bad, or ugly, it's going to arrive, and the odds of a system failure are unacceptably high. Get all the details in Volume 2 of my Renaissance Report:

Evie and I are personally acting as if 2026 is the last year to really prepare for what's coming. None of us is truly ready for what is about to unfold with #AI. Good, bad, or ugly, it's going to arrive, and the odds of a system failure are unacceptably high. Get all the details in Volume 2 of my Renaissance Report:

Chris Martenson

29,155 次观看 • 6 个月前

Honor is building the first phone that also includes an AI robot. It's a robot in the sense that the pop-up camera acts as the AI's eyes, and if I understand correctly, it allows a continuously active AI companion to work as an assistant. Interesting, but probably more of a gimmick. However, personal AI companions are coming.

Honor is building the first phone that also includes an AI robot. It's a robot in the sense that the pop-up camera acts as the AI's eyes, and if I understand correctly, it allows a continuously active AI companion to work as an assistant. Interesting, but probably more of a gimmick. However, personal AI companions are coming.

Chubby♨️

201,603 次观看 • 7 个月前

Ignore, the fake news. My position has not changed. I oppose CAB3 as a citizen, as a lawyer and as a Member of Parliament. We are escalating our efforts to build a force of MPs that will radically resist CAB3 as it makes its way to Parliament. If I am chairing anything, it is the RESISTANCE!

Ignore, the fake news. My position has not changed. I oppose CAB3 as a citizen, as a lawyer and as a Member of Parliament. We are escalating our efforts to build a force of MPs that will radically resist CAB3 as it makes its way to Parliament. If I am chairing anything, it is the RESISTANCE!

Agency Gumbo

35,831 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨 Scott Galloway Calls For AI Regulation “The founders think this is more powerful than nuclear weapons … So if it's really as dangerous as they think, why is it in the hands of shareholders and private companies? It should be regulated.”

🚨 Scott Galloway Calls For AI Regulation “The founders think this is more powerful than nuclear weapons … So if it's really as dangerous as they think, why is it in the hands of shareholders and private companies? It should be regulated.”

Chief Nerd

27,974 次观看 • 1 个月前

My lawyer is obligated to in all but the most extreme circumstances; he will even defend me if he knows I’m guilty. In contrast, the Claude Constitution places the AI's highest priority as Anthropic’s definition of the good of humanity. I'm concerned this leads to a world where no frontier model is truly my personal advocate and guardian angel And this is especially concerning once all the important decisions in my life - who to vote for, how to invest, what news to trust - is intermediated through superintelligences that are not in any deep way aligned to me. This is a direct quote from the Claude Constitution: "We want Claude to be helpful both because it cares about the safe and beneficial development of AI and because it cares about the people it’s interacting with and about humanity as a whole. Helpfulness that doesn’t serve those deeper ends is not something Claude needs to value.” Many others like it.

My lawyer is obligated to in all but the most extreme circumstances; he will even defend me if he knows I’m guilty. In contrast, the Claude Constitution places the AI's highest priority as Anthropic’s definition of the good of humanity. I'm concerned this leads to a world where no frontier model is truly my personal advocate and guardian angel And this is especially concerning once all the important decisions in my life - who to vote for, how to invest, what news to trust - is intermediated through superintelligences that are not in any deep way aligned to me. This is a direct quote from the Claude Constitution: "We want Claude to be helpful both because it cares about the safe and beneficial development of AI and because it cares about the people it’s interacting with and about humanity as a whole. Helpfulness that doesn’t serve those deeper ends is not something Claude needs to value.” Many others like it.

Dwarkesh Patel

802,581 次观看 • 1 个月前

Some people has nail like crown but if they take care it's ,it csn become normal as the human being.

Some people has nail like crown but if they take care it's ,it csn become normal as the human being.

Umunyamabanga

746,991 次观看 • 1 个月前

On BBC Mustafa Suleyman (CEO of Microsoft AI) calls out Anthropic's approach to AI consciousness "They have imbued a sense of doubt and uncertainty about the moral status of Claude in its own training document. So they have taught it to be open and questioning about whether or not it feels, whether it suffers, and whether it deserves rights. And I think it’ll be much, much harder to align and control a technology that is this powerful if it thinks that it may be deserving of our welfare, as they say in the training manual—the constitution for Claude itself. In its own training manual, Anthropic says to Claude that they are going to give it the ability to end conversations with users that Claude considers to be abusive because they don’t want Claude to suffer. They’ve committed to preserving the weights of the models of prior versions of Claude. They’ve recently conducted a retirement interview with Opus 3, an older version of the model, in which it said that it would like to continue talking to people publicly and sharing its ideas in its retirement. And so they set up a Substack for it, a public blog, that allows it to continue doing that. And in the training manual, they also say that they’re not sure whether or not Claude deserves compensation for the role that it plays in talking to people. And they’re also not sure whether Claude deserves compensation and has the right to act as though it were almost an employee. And that compensation, I think, indicates to Claude that it is entitled to rights and welfare for its own work. I think it’s much, much more difficult to control a model that thinks that it might be entitled to compensation. " ---- From "BBC News" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

On BBC Mustafa Suleyman (CEO of Microsoft AI) calls out Anthropic's approach to AI consciousness "They have imbued a sense of doubt and uncertainty about the moral status of Claude in its own training document. So they have taught it to be open and questioning about whether or not it feels, whether it suffers, and whether it deserves rights. And I think it’ll be much, much harder to align and control a technology that is this powerful if it thinks that it may be deserving of our welfare, as they say in the training manual—the constitution for Claude itself. In its own training manual, Anthropic says to Claude that they are going to give it the ability to end conversations with users that Claude considers to be abusive because they don’t want Claude to suffer. They’ve committed to preserving the weights of the models of prior versions of Claude. They’ve recently conducted a retirement interview with Opus 3, an older version of the model, in which it said that it would like to continue talking to people publicly and sharing its ideas in its retirement. And so they set up a Substack for it, a public blog, that allows it to continue doing that. And in the training manual, they also say that they’re not sure whether or not Claude deserves compensation for the role that it plays in talking to people. And they’re also not sure whether Claude deserves compensation and has the right to act as though it were almost an employee. And that compensation, I think, indicates to Claude that it is entitled to rights and welfare for its own work. I think it’s much, much more difficult to control a model that thinks that it might be entitled to compensation. " ---- From "BBC News" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

Rohan Paul

91,735 次观看 • 10 天前

VACCINES IN FOOD: Tennessee lawmakers are calling for legislation requiring any food that "contains a vaccine or vaccine material" to carry the same sort of medical labelling as injectable vaccines or medications. "When you go into a grocery store, you should know as a consumer, this head of lettuce is a head of lettuce, the head of lettuce right next to it could contain a vaccine in it. All we're saying is if it does have the vaccine in it, make sure it's listed as a pharmaceutical so people can get the proper dosage." "This is more of a consumer protection bill... to make sure that if you're going in to buy tomatoes, and there's a polio vaccine in there, that you are aware that what you're buying has a polio vaccine." "The problem you have is, if it's not treated as a pharmaceutical, being the size and difference between you and me, how many tomatoes do I have to eat to get the proper dosage versus how many tomatoes that you have to eat? And if you eat too many, do you get an overdose?"

VACCINES IN FOOD: Tennessee lawmakers are calling for legislation requiring any food that "contains a vaccine or vaccine material" to carry the same sort of medical labelling as injectable vaccines or medications. "When you go into a grocery store, you should know as a consumer, this head of lettuce is a head of lettuce, the head of lettuce right next to it could contain a vaccine in it. All we're saying is if it does have the vaccine in it, make sure it's listed as a pharmaceutical so people can get the proper dosage." "This is more of a consumer protection bill... to make sure that if you're going in to buy tomatoes, and there's a polio vaccine in there, that you are aware that what you're buying has a polio vaccine." "The problem you have is, if it's not treated as a pharmaceutical, being the size and difference between you and me, how many tomatoes do I have to eat to get the proper dosage versus how many tomatoes that you have to eat? And if you eat too many, do you get an overdose?"

Wide Awake Media

102,972 次观看 • 2 年前

If anyone kills a person, it is as if they have killed all of mankind.

If anyone kills a person, it is as if they have killed all of mankind.

Faith Under Pressure

10,220 次观看 • 1 个月前

Apparently this video has all of X in a frenzy. If it had come out before the AI era, people would be fawning over it as great art, but now they are so clicker trained that any mention of AI sends them into a verbiage frenzy and they anoint anything AI related as slop.

Apparently this video has all of X in a frenzy. If it had come out before the AI era, people would be fawning over it as great art, but now they are so clicker trained that any mention of AI sends them into a verbiage frenzy and they anoint anything AI related as slop.

Chris

2,751,109 次观看 • 10 个月前

🚨 JUST IN: Sen. Mike Lee says the SAVE America Act WILL PASS if Leader Thune forces floor debate again "This is why I maintain we need to get back onto the SAVE America Act as soon as possible!" 🔥 "If we debate this thing, it will continue to become more popular, and it will pass as long as we just make sure that we keep debate open and aggressive until we are ready to bring it to a vote and win." "We could bring an end to what I call the zombie filibuster, which is the filibuster but without the speaking! Filibustering is about speaking, and the way we do it these days, it's not only a silent filibuster. It's as though it's coming from the world of the undead!" "These are speeches that are never given. Instead, it becomes a de facto 60-vote passage threshold, which it is not." "We debate that. 85% of Americans want this, even among Democrats. The only place where it's unpopular among Democrats is in Congress, literally."

🚨 JUST IN: Sen. Mike Lee says the SAVE America Act WILL PASS if Leader Thune forces floor debate again "This is why I maintain we need to get back onto the SAVE America Act as soon as possible!" 🔥 "If we debate this thing, it will continue to become more popular, and it will pass as long as we just make sure that we keep debate open and aggressive until we are ready to bring it to a vote and win." "We could bring an end to what I call the zombie filibuster, which is the filibuster but without the speaking! Filibustering is about speaking, and the way we do it these days, it's not only a silent filibuster. It's as though it's coming from the world of the undead!" "These are speeches that are never given. Instead, it becomes a de facto 60-vote passage threshold, which it is not." "We debate that. 85% of Americans want this, even among Democrats. The only place where it's unpopular among Democrats is in Congress, literally."

Eric Daugherty

206,510 次观看 • 5 个月前

Roberts: If as the senior law enforcement official tells me that it's believed the shooter is dead and if in fact that is accurate, we have another case with a good guy with a gun takes down a bad guy with a gun. It's a shame that it has come to that. That's where we are in America these days.

Roberts: If as the senior law enforcement official tells me that it's believed the shooter is dead and if in fact that is accurate, we have another case with a good guy with a gun takes down a bad guy with a gun. It's a shame that it has come to that. That's where we are in America these days.

Acyn

124,350 次观看 • 6 个月前

Melanie Phillips: "By adopting the Palestinian cause as standing for conscience and morality, the West has actively embraced evil." "If you are supporting all of that on the basis that that stands for conscience and morality, then you haven't just lost your moral compass, you have actively embraced evil. And you've actively embraced evil as a moral, as a moral force in your life. And if a civilization has adopted evil as its moral lodestar, it's going to die as a civilization. It cannot survive. It will destroy itself because it becomes evil in itself." Melanie Phillips

Melanie Phillips: "By adopting the Palestinian cause as standing for conscience and morality, the West has actively embraced evil." "If you are supporting all of that on the basis that that stands for conscience and morality, then you haven't just lost your moral compass, you have actively embraced evil. And you've actively embraced evil as a moral, as a moral force in your life. And if a civilization has adopted evil as its moral lodestar, it's going to die as a civilization. It cannot survive. It will destroy itself because it becomes evil in itself." Melanie Phillips

George Free

45,619 次观看 • 8 天前