Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

The Liberal gun grab program is a complete failure. Yet, it’s moving forward. And nearly $1 billion, of our taxpayer dollars, is going to fund it, despite the pilot in Cape Breton being a catastrophic failure. This gun grab & the excuse for “safety”, by taking it away from...

mario4thenorth's profile picture

Mario Zelaya

97,922 subscribers

16,761 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

The Liberals gun-grab scare tactic: Have the RCMP send an email to law-abiding Canadians, on behalf of Public Safety, trying to subtly scare Canadians into giving up their firearms. In the email, they misrepresent the truth... that the program is to keep Canadians safe due to rising crime. The reality is, the vast majority of firearms used in crime are from the US. In addition, other than Quebec, no province is interested in participating in the program nor do they have the resources to enforce it. And they also do not believe in the program, with one Premier who is a law-abiding firearm owner, even going so far as calling the program a "headache".
2:59

The Liberals gun-grab scare tactic: Have the RCMP send an email to law-abiding Canadians, on behalf of Public Safety, trying to subtly scare Canadians into giving up their firearms. In the email, they misrepresent the truth... that the program is to keep Canadians safe due to rising crime. The reality is, the vast majority of firearms used in crime are from the US. In addition, other than Quebec, no province is interested in participating in the program nor do they have the resources to enforce it. And they also do not believe in the program, with one Premier who is a law-abiding firearm owner, even going so far as calling the program a "headache".

Mario Zelaya

16,624 views • 5 months ago

What an absolute disaster this gun grab is by our Government. They claim they are getting these gun off our streets? They aren’t on the streets. They are being held by law abiding gun owners. Gary gets called out on this program being a failure so he starts getting snippy. What a waste of money and resources.
3:00

What an absolute disaster this gun grab is by our Government. They claim they are getting these gun off our streets? They aren’t on the streets. They are being held by law abiding gun owners. Gary gets called out on this program being a failure so he starts getting snippy. What a waste of money and resources.

Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱

74,188 views • 3 months ago

The Trudeau-era gun “buyback” program is a fiscal misstep that Canada simply can’t afford. With a national deficit projected to hit $61.9 billion in 2025, diverting hundreds of millions—potentially billions—toward confiscating legally owned firearms from law-abiding citizens is, economically speaking, indefensible. The program’s estimated $1.6B cost, which will almost certainly balloon like the failed gun registry of the mid-90's, siphons funds from critical priorities like healthcare, housing, infrastructure and public safety. In addition, the program also fails at its goal: to increase public safety. Since the first gun ban, issued by Trudeau's government via Order-in-Council in May of 2020, law enforcement and policy leaders from across the country have been clear: The data continues to show that legal gun bans have had no measurable effect to slow criminal gun violence. In fact, it's only gotten worse. Primarily, that's because 90%+ of firearms used in violent crimes in Canada are illegally smuggled into the country, not legally owned by Canadian citizens. Firearms purchased in a gun 'buyback' program, aren't the guns being used in crime. If the Mark Carney government is serious about being fiscally responsible, and a protector of the rights of law-abiding gun owners, it would be a pragmatic and prudent first step to scrap this ineffective and costly program. If you agree, please share this post. #cdnpoli
0:56

The Trudeau-era gun “buyback” program is a fiscal misstep that Canada simply can’t afford. With a national deficit projected to hit $61.9 billion in 2025, diverting hundreds of millions—potentially billions—toward confiscating legally owned firearms from law-abiding citizens is, economically speaking, indefensible. The program’s estimated $1.6B cost, which will almost certainly balloon like the failed gun registry of the mid-90's, siphons funds from critical priorities like healthcare, housing, infrastructure and public safety. In addition, the program also fails at its goal: to increase public safety. Since the first gun ban, issued by Trudeau's government via Order-in-Council in May of 2020, law enforcement and policy leaders from across the country have been clear: The data continues to show that legal gun bans have had no measurable effect to slow criminal gun violence. In fact, it's only gotten worse. Primarily, that's because 90%+ of firearms used in violent crimes in Canada are illegally smuggled into the country, not legally owned by Canadian citizens. Firearms purchased in a gun 'buyback' program, aren't the guns being used in crime. If the Mark Carney government is serious about being fiscally responsible, and a protector of the rights of law-abiding gun owners, it would be a pragmatic and prudent first step to scrap this ineffective and costly program. If you agree, please share this post. #cdnpoli

CCFR/CCDAF

25,965 views • 1 year ago

PLAYING DUMB? Liberal Safety Minister @Gary_SRP is asked if 16 people in Cape Breton, handing in 25 firearms as part of the federal gun confiscation program, "was a failure." "As an overall Pilot, I believe it was successful," he said.
1:35

PLAYING DUMB? Liberal Safety Minister @Gary_SRP is asked if 16 people in Cape Breton, handing in 25 firearms as part of the federal gun confiscation program, "was a failure." "As an overall Pilot, I believe it was successful," he said.

CCFR/CCDAF

62,844 views • 6 months ago

Liberal Gun Grab Collapsing as Police Say NO After I sent a letter last Friday January 22, 2026 asking for answers, Durham Regional Police Services (DRPS) confirmed today, they will NOT take part in the Liberal gun confiscation program. In this video, I explain what the Chief said, why police across Ontario and multiple provinces are refusing to participate, and why law-abiding gun owners were never the problem. This is about public safety, common sense, and telling Canadians the truth. CCFR/CCDAF
5:06

Liberal Gun Grab Collapsing as Police Say NO After I sent a letter last Friday January 22, 2026 asking for answers, Durham Regional Police Services (DRPS) confirmed today, they will NOT take part in the Liberal gun confiscation program. In this video, I explain what the Chief said, why police across Ontario and multiple provinces are refusing to participate, and why law-abiding gun owners were never the problem. This is about public safety, common sense, and telling Canadians the truth. CCFR/CCDAF

Lisa Robinson

24,179 views • 5 months ago

All of the police services of jurisdiction in Elgin County, St. Thomas, and London (and countless more across the country) have said seizing firearms from law-abiding gun owners is not a priority for them. I asked Sean Fraser why it's a priority for the Liberal government.
2:11

All of the police services of jurisdiction in Elgin County, St. Thomas, and London (and countless more across the country) have said seizing firearms from law-abiding gun owners is not a priority for them. I asked Sean Fraser why it's a priority for the Liberal government.

Andrew Lawton

15,599 views • 5 months ago

“What just happened in Australia is why I’m a Christian and pro firearms.” “In Australia, law abiding citizens can’t carry for self defense.” “They don’t remove the evil, they regulate compliance.” “God never calls for his people to be passive in the face of evil.” Based!!
2:21

“What just happened in Australia is why I’m a Christian and pro firearms.” “In Australia, law abiding citizens can’t carry for self defense.” “They don’t remove the evil, they regulate compliance.” “God never calls for his people to be passive in the face of evil.” Based!!

AmericanPapaBear™

291,947 views • 7 months ago

Insane. This is happening in Canada. A Muslim preacher openly declares: “Those who say Islam wasn’t spread by the sword are lying. It was spread by the sword, that’s how Sharia spread!” He even proudly explains how Turkey was conquered and Islamized through jihad. This is not the Middle East. This is Canada. This is the West. They are telling us exactly what they believe and what they want. When will the West finally start listening?
0:50

Insane. This is happening in Canada. A Muslim preacher openly declares: “Those who say Islam wasn’t spread by the sword are lying. It was spread by the sword, that’s how Sharia spread!” He even proudly explains how Turkey was conquered and Islamized through jihad. This is not the Middle East. This is Canada. This is the West. They are telling us exactly what they believe and what they want. When will the West finally start listening?

Yossi BenYakar

47,085 views • 2 months ago

I don’t know when it was filmed, but it’s a great example of how Russian authorities think. They believe they are above the law, no matter what country they are in. — You’re not in Russia. You’re in America, so you have to abide by this country’s laws — Not exactly — Excuse me? — I have diplomatic immunity *For context, the Russian diplomat wasn’t okay with American filming the street in the US
1:12

I don’t know when it was filmed, but it’s a great example of how Russian authorities think. They believe they are above the law, no matter what country they are in. — You’re not in Russia. You’re in America, so you have to abide by this country’s laws — Not exactly — Excuse me? — I have diplomatic immunity *For context, the Russian diplomat wasn’t okay with American filming the street in the US

Victoria

40,306 views • 2 months ago

Virginia passed a new gun ban — and now some of the very prosecutors expected to enforce it are saying no. The law makes it a misdemeanor to buy, sell, transfer, import, or manufacture certain “assault firearms,” punishable by up to a year in jail and a $2,500 fine. That means a rifle that was legal on June 30th became a crime on July 1st because politicians moved a line on paper. But at least five Virginia prosecutors have already said they will not enforce the ban, arguing that it violates the Second Amendment. And here’s the poetic part: Virginia Democrats helped protect prosecutorial discretion years ago, meaning the governor and attorney general can complain all they want — but they can’t force those prosecutors to bring charges. They built the off-switch. Now it’s being used on their own gun ban. This is a win, but it’s not the end. The law is still on the books statewide, and the real fight is in court. With more than 20 million AR-15s in America and the rifle clearly in common use, this is exactly the kind of case the Supreme Court needs to stop ducking. Virginia tried to criminalize law-abiding gun owners. Their own prosecutors said no. Shop the “America” hat at:
2:20

Virginia passed a new gun ban — and now some of the very prosecutors expected to enforce it are saying no. The law makes it a misdemeanor to buy, sell, transfer, import, or manufacture certain “assault firearms,” punishable by up to a year in jail and a $2,500 fine. That means a rifle that was legal on June 30th became a crime on July 1st because politicians moved a line on paper. But at least five Virginia prosecutors have already said they will not enforce the ban, arguing that it violates the Second Amendment. And here’s the poetic part: Virginia Democrats helped protect prosecutorial discretion years ago, meaning the governor and attorney general can complain all they want — but they can’t force those prosecutors to bring charges. They built the off-switch. Now it’s being used on their own gun ban. This is a win, but it’s not the end. The law is still on the books statewide, and the real fight is in court. With more than 20 million AR-15s in America and the rifle clearly in common use, this is exactly the kind of case the Supreme Court needs to stop ducking. Virginia tried to criminalize law-abiding gun owners. Their own prosecutors said no. Shop the “America” hat at:

Colion Noir

39,825 views • 1 month ago

JP Tasker asks Public Safety Minister questions with facts rarely acknowledged in CBC reporting "Some 90% of the guns that they take off the streets as part of a sweep when it comes to a crime come from the United States, illegal firearms from the Americans." "Why crack down on legal firearms owners who arguably go through very stringent requirements to get a license and then have to follow a bunch of paperwork and regulations and what have you?" "Why go after them and not pour the $742 million you've allocated for this gun buyback program into beefing up the things that are happening at the border to stop what is really the main source of crime guns in this country?" Gary Anandasangaree J.P. Tasker
5:16

JP Tasker asks Public Safety Minister questions with facts rarely acknowledged in CBC reporting "Some 90% of the guns that they take off the streets as part of a sweep when it comes to a crime come from the United States, illegal firearms from the Americans." "Why crack down on legal firearms owners who arguably go through very stringent requirements to get a license and then have to follow a bunch of paperwork and regulations and what have you?" "Why go after them and not pour the $742 million you've allocated for this gun buyback program into beefing up the things that are happening at the border to stop what is really the main source of crime guns in this country?" Gary Anandasangaree J.P. Tasker

cbcwatcher

54,971 views • 9 months ago

And there it is.. 🚨 The Australian PM announces a massive gun grab program following Bondi Beach terrorist attack Do they really think terrorists are gonna show up and hand over their guns? No.. and they know that. They brought in millions of radical Muslims, and now they are disarming their own citizens, because they killed people. By design. All it would have taken was one armed law-abiding citizen to stop it— now they will have less.
0:40

And there it is.. 🚨 The Australian PM announces a massive gun grab program following Bondi Beach terrorist attack Do they really think terrorists are gonna show up and hand over their guns? No.. and they know that. They brought in millions of radical Muslims, and now they are disarming their own citizens, because they killed people. By design. All it would have taken was one armed law-abiding citizen to stop it— now they will have less.

MJTruthUltra

34,475 views • 6 months ago

'They were told not only did they not need the surgery, the child didn’t even have the condition. Didn’t even have the condition. Let that sink in. That is what is happening to the children of Ireland. And I say this: there is not enough urgency in government.'
0:30

'They were told not only did they not need the surgery, the child didn’t even have the condition. Didn’t even have the condition. Let that sink in. That is what is happening to the children of Ireland. And I say this: there is not enough urgency in government.'

The Ditch

100,587 views • 1 year ago

"By now I am sure you guys know what happened in Australia." "This is exactly why I will never stop fighting for having a 2nd Amendment right here in the United States." "Do you think a ban on firearms effects criminals?" "The only thing you did by those bans is take away the ability for law abiding citizens to be able to defend themselves." "More places should allow people to carry and defend themselves." Nothing stops a bad guy with a gun better than good guys with guns.
1:43

"By now I am sure you guys know what happened in Australia." "This is exactly why I will never stop fighting for having a 2nd Amendment right here in the United States." "Do you think a ban on firearms effects criminals?" "The only thing you did by those bans is take away the ability for law abiding citizens to be able to defend themselves." "More places should allow people to carry and defend themselves." Nothing stops a bad guy with a gun better than good guys with guns.

AmericanPapaBear™

58,718 views • 6 months ago

Alberta is the last stand for Canada. I’m not Albertan so personally, I would rather they stay in Canada because I understand the detrimental effects that this will have on the country. That being said, it might need to be done. Not just for Alberta - but for Canada. We might have to disassemble this whole thing so we can build something new. Nothing is working here. Our constitution, our judicial system, our parliamentary system….it’s time for a change. Maybe Alberta leaving is exactly what Canada needs to wake up.
0:52

Alberta is the last stand for Canada. I’m not Albertan so personally, I would rather they stay in Canada because I understand the detrimental effects that this will have on the country. That being said, it might need to be done. Not just for Alberta - but for Canada. We might have to disassemble this whole thing so we can build something new. Nothing is working here. Our constitution, our judicial system, our parliamentary system….it’s time for a change. Maybe Alberta leaving is exactly what Canada needs to wake up.

Karla Treadway | Host Sovereign Sphere Podcast

67,281 views • 2 months ago

🇨🇦 CANADIANS: COMPLY OR ELSE — OR ELSE WHAT EXACTLY?! 😡 The government is now openly threatening LAW-ABIDING gun owners with CRIMINAL PENALTIES if we don’t surrender our LEGALLY OWNED firearms after the amnesty ends. These are the rifles owned by hunters, sport shooters, and collectors — NOT criminals. Criminals? They’re laughing. Their illegal guns are completely unaffected. They’re not handing anything in. They never follow laws. NEVER. So who is this actually targeting? US!! The people who’ve done NOTHING wrong. This isn’t about safety. This is a straight-up GUN GRAB to flex power over obedient citizens while criminals run free. They’re turning responsible, law-abiding Canadians into CRIMINALS overnight for owning property they bought legally. HOW IS THIS OKAY?! How does anyone look at this and think it makes us safer?! Watch this clip of MP Gary Chipmunk 🐿️ calling it out — and tell me this isn’t pure hypocrisy. Enough is enough. Wake up, Canada. #GunGrab #TrudeauGunGrab #FirearmsBan #2A #Canada
0:44

🇨🇦 CANADIANS: COMPLY OR ELSE — OR ELSE WHAT EXACTLY?! 😡 The government is now openly threatening LAW-ABIDING gun owners with CRIMINAL PENALTIES if we don’t surrender our LEGALLY OWNED firearms after the amnesty ends. These are the rifles owned by hunters, sport shooters, and collectors — NOT criminals. Criminals? They’re laughing. Their illegal guns are completely unaffected. They’re not handing anything in. They never follow laws. NEVER. So who is this actually targeting? US!! The people who’ve done NOTHING wrong. This isn’t about safety. This is a straight-up GUN GRAB to flex power over obedient citizens while criminals run free. They’re turning responsible, law-abiding Canadians into CRIMINALS overnight for owning property they bought legally. HOW IS THIS OKAY?! How does anyone look at this and think it makes us safer?! Watch this clip of MP Gary Chipmunk 🐿️ calling it out — and tell me this isn’t pure hypocrisy. Enough is enough. Wake up, Canada. #GunGrab #TrudeauGunGrab #FirearmsBan #2A #Canada

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

24,830 views • 5 months ago

Zohran Mamdani visited a knife-wielding criminal in the hospital, and it has not received the attention it deserves. This is what happens when radical leftists gain power. They consistently side with criminals OVER law-abiding citizens!
1:33

Zohran Mamdani visited a knife-wielding criminal in the hospital, and it has not received the attention it deserves. This is what happens when radical leftists gain power. They consistently side with criminals OVER law-abiding citizens!

Erika Donalds

27,201 views • 5 months ago

The last thing Texas, or the nation needs are Red Flag Laws. As a military veteran and proud gun owner, I know that burdening law-abiding citizens goes against the very spirit of the Second Amendment. That’s exactly why John Cornyn is in trouble, Texans don’t want gun grabs disguised as “safety.” And every time weak Republicans make concessions with our fundamental rights, what’s the first thing the Left says? “We have to do more.” They will never be satisfied until the 2nd Amendment is erased from history. NOT on my watch.
1:20

The last thing Texas, or the nation needs are Red Flag Laws. As a military veteran and proud gun owner, I know that burdening law-abiding citizens goes against the very spirit of the Second Amendment. That’s exactly why John Cornyn is in trouble, Texans don’t want gun grabs disguised as “safety.” And every time weak Republicans make concessions with our fundamental rights, what’s the first thing the Left says? “We have to do more.” They will never be satisfied until the 2nd Amendment is erased from history. NOT on my watch.

Wesley Hunt

15,509 views • 9 months ago

No one in Canada should have to experience this. They beat him. Unnecessarily. Then kicked his head in, after they dropped him. And yet, our laws, prevent him from having the most basic deterrents like pepper spray. If he had it, and used it, he’d be charged. Our government takes firearms from law abiding citizens, ensures we cannot defend ourselves, our property or our family, and puts up a “reasonable defence” clause. The only thing reasonable when you’re being robbed, beaten and outnumbered is unreasonable and disproportionate force. Along with harsh & long sentences. Make this crime, unthinkable.
2:56

No one in Canada should have to experience this. They beat him. Unnecessarily. Then kicked his head in, after they dropped him. And yet, our laws, prevent him from having the most basic deterrents like pepper spray. If he had it, and used it, he’d be charged. Our government takes firearms from law abiding citizens, ensures we cannot defend ourselves, our property or our family, and puts up a “reasonable defence” clause. The only thing reasonable when you’re being robbed, beaten and outnumbered is unreasonable and disproportionate force. Along with harsh & long sentences. Make this crime, unthinkable.

Mario Zelaya

36,080 views • 7 months ago

Reporter: Are further troop drawdowns in Europe likely? Trump: We’re going to see. I was very disappointed with NATO. Frankly, if it weren’t held in Turkey, where my friend happens to be a very strong leader, a very strong person, it’s possible that I wouldn’t have attended. I felt I had to attend because, you know, I know he’s gone all out. It was a big thing to have NATO come to Turkey—or anyplace else. It’s a big thing. But we weren’t treated well because we did something in Iran. We don’t need anybody’s help. I didn’t even want their help. But before I asked, they said they wouldn’t be there. We’ve invested trillions of dollars in NATO. Why? To protect European countries and others—Canada, etc.—to protect people and countries from, generally speaking, what used to be the Soviet Union. Now it’s Russia. And I say that’s fine, but you would think they’d be very willing to do something to help us, and they really weren’t. In the case of the United Kingdom, the prime minister—I guess he’s no longer there, maybe because of this; it was a very unpopular thing he did—said, “No, we’ll help after the war is over.” I said, “I don’t need that kind of help.” We didn’t need any help at all. In a way, I was testing people. I was testing to see whether or not they’d be there because I’ve long said that we help them, but I’m not sure they’d be there for us. Italy turned us down, Germany turned us down, and France turned us down. It’s OK, but why are we spending hundreds of billions of dollars if they’re not there for us? We’ve always been there for them.
2:04

Reporter: Are further troop drawdowns in Europe likely? Trump: We’re going to see. I was very disappointed with NATO. Frankly, if it weren’t held in Turkey, where my friend happens to be a very strong leader, a very strong person, it’s possible that I wouldn’t have attended. I felt I had to attend because, you know, I know he’s gone all out. It was a big thing to have NATO come to Turkey—or anyplace else. It’s a big thing. But we weren’t treated well because we did something in Iran. We don’t need anybody’s help. I didn’t even want their help. But before I asked, they said they wouldn’t be there. We’ve invested trillions of dollars in NATO. Why? To protect European countries and others—Canada, etc.—to protect people and countries from, generally speaking, what used to be the Soviet Union. Now it’s Russia. And I say that’s fine, but you would think they’d be very willing to do something to help us, and they really weren’t. In the case of the United Kingdom, the prime minister—I guess he’s no longer there, maybe because of this; it was a very unpopular thing he did—said, “No, we’ll help after the war is over.” I said, “I don’t need that kind of help.” We didn’t need any help at all. In a way, I was testing people. I was testing to see whether or not they’d be there because I’ve long said that we help them, but I’m not sure they’d be there for us. Italy turned us down, Germany turned us down, and France turned us down. It’s OK, but why are we spending hundreds of billions of dollars if they’re not there for us? We’ve always been there for them.

Acyn

212,321 views • 7 days ago