Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

The LNP hypocrisy is again exposed with multiple MPs previously opposing cuts to the fuel excise rebate🤦 Dutton "It's costly and can be gamed by the energy giants" Angus "You'll see price rises elsewhere as a result" Barnaby "It'll take money away that we spend on roads"

Squizz

36,170 subscribers

20,176 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika Eğitim Komedi

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Yorum

Poiter profil fotoğrafı

Poiter1 yıl önce

The LNP are spruiking a $1500 saving for families. How many families churn thru 6000 litres of fuel in a year? The average vehicle travels 12100km per year. That’s about 2km/litre average based on the LNP info Oh, and btw, Gina pays no fuel excise saving over 86 million / year

Rarely Tolerable. profil fotoğrafı

Rarely Tolerable.1 yıl önce

Senator Wyden: " We are in an arms race on clean energy with them. Are you going to be on the side of people who want to unravel this?" Treasury secretary nominee Scott Bessent: " China will build a hundred new coal plants this year. Senator Wyden. There is not a clean energy race. There is an energy race. China will build 10 nuclear plants this year."

Robert Stevenson profil fotoğrafı

Robert Stevenson1 yıl önce

So, the LNP have only recently opposed their own election policy on the fuel excise rebate. They are now using something they don't believe in to try to capture a few votes. Hypocrisy must begin with a capital L.

Miss Polly 🖤💛❤️ profil fotoğrafı

Miss Polly 🖤💛❤️1 yıl önce

Maybe if the LNP is elected they all plan on buying shares in the fuel giants before those fuel giants jack up their prices to game the system. Remember past behaviour is the best indicator of future behaviour.

Don Nardella profil fotoğrafı

Don Nardella1 yıl önce

This is brilliant and true.

Warthog profil fotoğrafı

Warthog1 yıl önce

Andrew on Sky News is not impressed with this policy.

Gregory Robert profil fotoğrafı

Gregory Robert1 yıl önce

💥LNP, diametrically opposed to anything ……………… until The Lying Nasty Party make it part of their manifesto!💥

Hugh de Beer profil fotoğrafı

Hugh de Beer1 yıl önce

It’s a gas gas gas 🎶🎶🎶🤣🤣🤣🤣

Stumpy profil fotoğrafı

Stumpy1 yıl önce

And @Barnaby_Joyce needs good roads to sleep on!

Fran Albones profil fotoğrafı

Fran Albones1 yıl önce

Love it. Call them out

Benzer Videolar

The LNP interject constantly, and The Speaker finally boots one of them. Chris Bowen reminds parliament that (as energy minister) Angus Taylor would be still begging for the fuel he stored in Texas with "Houston ... we have a problem" #qt

The LNP interject constantly, and The Speaker finally boots one of them. Chris Bowen reminds parliament that (as energy minister) Angus Taylor would be still begging for the fuel he stored in Texas with "Houston ... we have a problem" #qt

Squizz

19,189 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

In the last parliament, it was Liberal Democrat MPs that first called for a windfall tax, first called to scrap the energy price hike and first put sewage on the agenda. That’s what we did with 15 MPs. Imagine what we can achieve now.

In the last parliament, it was Liberal Democrat MPs that first called for a windfall tax, first called to scrap the energy price hike and first put sewage on the agenda. That’s what we did with 15 MPs. Imagine what we can achieve now.

Liberal Democrats

35,640 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

As more servos run empty and fuel rises past $3 a litre, One Nation is the only party with a clear plan to help Australians. Here's what the Government should be doing in this fuel crisis: Trigger the Liquid Fuel Emergency Act 1984 to force fuel supplies into the regions and stop the price gouging by Big Oil. Start precautionary rationing so priority supplies for hospitals, emergency services, defence and food production can be saved if the Strait of Hormuz remains closed. Cut the fuel excise by 100% for 3 months and/or remove GST on fuel which is a tax on a tax. This will give immediate relief to Australians. Finally, ditch net-zero so we can drill Australia's own oil, rebuild refineries and never get into this situation again. It's time for the government to step up and demonstrate they actually have a plan. If the government doesn't want panic then they need to lead. One Nation is happy to show them what to do.

As more servos run empty and fuel rises past $3 a litre, One Nation is the only party with a clear plan to help Australians. Here's what the Government should be doing in this fuel crisis: Trigger the Liquid Fuel Emergency Act 1984 to force fuel supplies into the regions and stop the price gouging by Big Oil. Start precautionary rationing so priority supplies for hospitals, emergency services, defence and food production can be saved if the Strait of Hormuz remains closed. Cut the fuel excise by 100% for 3 months and/or remove GST on fuel which is a tax on a tax. This will give immediate relief to Australians. Finally, ditch net-zero so we can drill Australia's own oil, rebuild refineries and never get into this situation again. It's time for the government to step up and demonstrate they actually have a plan. If the government doesn't want panic then they need to lead. One Nation is happy to show them what to do.

Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺

109,966 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Jane Hume blames the public service and spruiks the private sector - but she was asked about the LNP cutting the public service to cause Robodebt, and a tax avoidance scandal by the private sector🤦 It seems all they can promise is that they'll be just as shit as the last time.

Jane Hume blames the public service and spruiks the private sector - but she was asked about the LNP cutting the public service to cause Robodebt, and a tax avoidance scandal by the private sector🤦 It seems all they can promise is that they'll be just as shit as the last time.

Squizz

23,424 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Oz: 70% of the money we spend is on chronic illness and we are not getting our money's worth. For folks listening right now, it's your patriotic duty to be as healthy as can you…

Oz: 70% of the money we spend is on chronic illness and we are not getting our money's worth. For folks listening right now, it's your patriotic duty to be as healthy as can you…

Acyn

2,820,476 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

"We can get to 100% green energy in our economy in just 10 years, with no public money. We can have permanently low energy bills. Eradicate fuel poverty. And be energy independent as a country. "Our gov have turned their back on it as they want green issues to be part of the culture wars. All this gov has is to create enemies, like the EU, public sector workers, and now green energy." Dale Vince #BBCQT

"We can get to 100% green energy in our economy in just 10 years, with no public money. We can have permanently low energy bills. Eradicate fuel poverty. And be energy independent as a country. "Our gov have turned their back on it as they want green issues to be part of the culture wars. All this gov has is to create enemies, like the EU, public sector workers, and now green energy." Dale Vince #BBCQT

Farrukh

410,593 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

“We need to reach an agreement with the Russians on arms limitation,” Orbán said, adding that the militarization of Ukraine and the EU must be stopped. “We need to negotiate not only with the Ukrainians, but directly with the Russians as well. After a ceasefire and the signing of a peace agreement, Russia must again become part of the European economy—for example, by supplying energy and raw materials. We will also be part of their economy if we can—if we can export our goods there. And we must also agree on arms limitation, because at the current pace, we’ll need to spend another €500 billion on weapons—and that would sink us. It’s simply impossible. The only way to reduce arms spending is for the opposing sides to reach disarmament agreements and lower defense expenditures so that funds and resources can be allocated to other vital needs. In short, we must reach an agreement with the Russians, and then clearly regulate how we cooperate with Ukraine and the European Union—without making Ukraine a member of the EU.” - SK

“We need to reach an agreement with the Russians on arms limitation,” Orbán said, adding that the militarization of Ukraine and the EU must be stopped. “We need to negotiate not only with the Ukrainians, but directly with the Russians as well. After a ceasefire and the signing of a peace agreement, Russia must again become part of the European economy—for example, by supplying energy and raw materials. We will also be part of their economy if we can—if we can export our goods there. And we must also agree on arms limitation, because at the current pace, we’ll need to spend another €500 billion on weapons—and that would sink us. It’s simply impossible. The only way to reduce arms spending is for the opposing sides to reach disarmament agreements and lower defense expenditures so that funds and resources can be allocated to other vital needs. In short, we must reach an agreement with the Russians, and then clearly regulate how we cooperate with Ukraine and the European Union—without making Ukraine a member of the EU.” - SK

Zlatti71

35,937 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

President Trump said the tariffs on China were imposed so that it doesn't spend its "massive surplus" on the military. "China is a massive surplus. That they take and they spend on their military. We don't want that. I don't want them to take $500 billion, $600 billion a year and spend it on their military. I don't want them spending money on their military. We shouldn't have to spend that either. I said this to President Xi hopefully it's the money we are never going to use." Meanwhile, it is reported that China is selling $50 billion in US treasuries in response to the tariffs

President Trump said the tariffs on China were imposed so that it doesn't spend its "massive surplus" on the military. "China is a massive surplus. That they take and they spend on their military. We don't want that. I don't want them to take $500 billion, $600 billion a year and spend it on their military. I don't want them spending money on their military. We shouldn't have to spend that either. I said this to President Xi hopefully it's the money we are never going to use." Meanwhile, it is reported that China is selling $50 billion in US treasuries in response to the tariffs

Anton Gerashchenko

346,498 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

This morning it was announced that the energy price cap will rise again in October. It's a choice. We don't have to be price gouged. We could, as promised, have lower bills - and we could have a public ownership first policy that gives us more and more control over time.

This morning it was announced that the energy price cap will rise again in October. It's a choice. We don't have to be price gouged. We could, as promised, have lower bills - and we could have a public ownership first policy that gives us more and more control over time.

James Schneider

21,854 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Former Greek Finance Minister Varoufakis on the hypocrisy of Europe: "We are sending weapons to the Ukrainians in order to win a war that cannot be won, and as a result, Ukraine will be destroyed." This is exactly what is happening. The West has entered this war with Russia in Ukraine with the goal of defeating Russia, which is impossible. As a result, the war has been going on for four years and can only end with Russia's victory. Of course, Russia will gain territories that will be nothing but ruins if the West does not withdraw from this war.

Former Greek Finance Minister Varoufakis on the hypocrisy of Europe: "We are sending weapons to the Ukrainians in order to win a war that cannot be won, and as a result, Ukraine will be destroyed." This is exactly what is happening. The West has entered this war with Russia in Ukraine with the goal of defeating Russia, which is impossible. As a result, the war has been going on for four years and can only end with Russia's victory. Of course, Russia will gain territories that will be nothing but ruins if the West does not withdraw from this war.

Victor vicktop55 commentary

66,488 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Gent in yellow, "I'm an engineer, a scientist by background, and what I really care about is energy" "And that's one of these things which I feel has been turned into a culture war" "So let me say one thing" "We know that heat pumps, insulation, EVs, etc can save half your energy usage" "It's a massive difference" "And Iran, while, and this is not just about climate change, we can use as a strategic reserve" "We can use that oil for aviation or AI data centres" "But we've got politicians here on the table today, I believe, who deny these facts" "And why should we platform you when we can save that money? The energy. The money" "And this also means that we're not paying the oil money to Russia, which uses it to strike Ukraine every day, and we pay again for defence missiles" "So it's a very serious question. And this is the science, this is the fact. You cannot say that that does not save half the energy."

Gent in yellow, "I'm an engineer, a scientist by background, and what I really care about is energy" "And that's one of these things which I feel has been turned into a culture war" "So let me say one thing" "We know that heat pumps, insulation, EVs, etc can save half your energy usage" "It's a massive difference" "And Iran, while, and this is not just about climate change, we can use as a strategic reserve" "We can use that oil for aviation or AI data centres" "But we've got politicians here on the table today, I believe, who deny these facts" "And why should we platform you when we can save that money? The energy. The money" "And this also means that we're not paying the oil money to Russia, which uses it to strike Ukraine every day, and we pay again for defence missiles" "So it's a very serious question. And this is the science, this is the fact. You cannot say that that does not save half the energy."

Farrukh

607,650 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Thanks Rhun ap Iorwerth MS. Once again the First Minister is playing fast and loose with the facts. On ‘pay rises’ that are actually pay cuts. On a ‘surge’ in patient numbers when levels remain lightyears from business as usual. We need honesty here.

Thanks Rhun ap Iorwerth MS. Once again the First Minister is playing fast and loose with the facts. On ‘pay rises’ that are actually pay cuts. On a ‘surge’ in patient numbers when levels remain lightyears from business as usual. We need honesty here.

BDA

12,142 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Zack Polanski, "It's a tax on assets of 1% on £10m+ or 2% on £1 billion+" "The most obvious win here is to bring Capital Gains Tax in line with Income Tax" "The reason why that's important is right now we tax earned income more than we tax unearned wealth" "If you're a cleaner, you could be paying more tax than the person who owns the building that you're cleaning" "It's completely absurd. It's a political choice. We can make different political choices" "When Ruth said it's difficult to find wealth, that there are practical challenges, so let's spend more money on HMRC" "We keep underspending on the NHS, it shouldn't be a surprise we have a sick population" "So yes, spend money up front on public infrastructure, on our services, but we're getting that money back, in terms of a much better economy and a healthier population" "It's outrageous that we would have any more spending cuts" "People in this country are tired and exhausted" "They see the cost of living raised and they're not seeing their wages go with it" "We have wealth in this country that we can redistribute" "So the idea that people who are already struggling, as a result of political decisions and consequences of the past decade, are going to have to suffer another round of cuts" "It's not a surprise to me when Nigel Farage talks about connecting with people's fear and anger, that's he doing so well" "Of course I say this because Reform UK's solutions will make things even worse" "That's why the Greens are doing so well right now, we're offering hope and some practical solutions" "To say we don't need to cut spending and actually we need to tax the wealthier in our country more and invest in public services"

Zack Polanski, "It's a tax on assets of 1% on £10m+ or 2% on £1 billion+" "The most obvious win here is to bring Capital Gains Tax in line with Income Tax" "The reason why that's important is right now we tax earned income more than we tax unearned wealth" "If you're a cleaner, you could be paying more tax than the person who owns the building that you're cleaning" "It's completely absurd. It's a political choice. We can make different political choices" "When Ruth said it's difficult to find wealth, that there are practical challenges, so let's spend more money on HMRC" "We keep underspending on the NHS, it shouldn't be a surprise we have a sick population" "So yes, spend money up front on public infrastructure, on our services, but we're getting that money back, in terms of a much better economy and a healthier population" "It's outrageous that we would have any more spending cuts" "People in this country are tired and exhausted" "They see the cost of living raised and they're not seeing their wages go with it" "We have wealth in this country that we can redistribute" "So the idea that people who are already struggling, as a result of political decisions and consequences of the past decade, are going to have to suffer another round of cuts" "It's not a surprise to me when Nigel Farage talks about connecting with people's fear and anger, that's he doing so well" "Of course I say this because Reform UK's solutions will make things even worse" "That's why the Greens are doing so well right now, we're offering hope and some practical solutions" "To say we don't need to cut spending and actually we need to tax the wealthier in our country more and invest in public services"

Farrukh

309,551 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

BREAKING: Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth is now issuing filmed fact-checks of the media from the Pentagon. Brilliant. Hegseth issued 3 fact checks, calling out the media for their "bogus" reporting on the Pentagon's recent activities. 1. "The first is DOGE... With DOGE, we're focusing as much as we can on headquarters, and fat, and redundancies, and top-line stuff that allows us to reinvest elsewhere." "We welcome DOGE, and finding those efficiencies is how we save taxpayer dollars. That is a good thing that of course is being distorted through the media..." 2. "The second story in the news is our work reorienting the budget that we inherited..." "The media wants to call these exclusive cuts, but it's the opposite, of course, as always is the case... we are pulling around 8% or $50,000,000,000 from the Biden budget." "We will move away from woke Biden era nonlethal programs, and instead spend that money on President Trump's America first peace through strength priorities for our national budget." 3. "The third and final bogus story that is out there is around our reevaluation of our probationary workforce." "Bottom line, it is simply not in the public interest to retain individuals whose contributions are not mission-critical, and to restore accountability within the federal workforce." "Taxpayers deserve to have us take a really thorough look at our workforce top to bottom, and it will be top to bottom, to see where we can find and eliminate redundancies."

BREAKING: Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth is now issuing filmed fact-checks of the media from the Pentagon. Brilliant. Hegseth issued 3 fact checks, calling out the media for their "bogus" reporting on the Pentagon's recent activities. 1. "The first is DOGE... With DOGE, we're focusing as much as we can on headquarters, and fat, and redundancies, and top-line stuff that allows us to reinvest elsewhere." "We welcome DOGE, and finding those efficiencies is how we save taxpayer dollars. That is a good thing that of course is being distorted through the media..." 2. "The second story in the news is our work reorienting the budget that we inherited..." "The media wants to call these exclusive cuts, but it's the opposite, of course, as always is the case... we are pulling around 8% or $50,000,000,000 from the Biden budget." "We will move away from woke Biden era nonlethal programs, and instead spend that money on President Trump's America first peace through strength priorities for our national budget." 3. "The third and final bogus story that is out there is around our reevaluation of our probationary workforce." "Bottom line, it is simply not in the public interest to retain individuals whose contributions are not mission-critical, and to restore accountability within the federal workforce." "Taxpayers deserve to have us take a really thorough look at our workforce top to bottom, and it will be top to bottom, to see where we can find and eliminate redundancies."

Collin Rugg

4,440,613 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Susanna Reid, "10 million pensioners affected by the winter fuel allowance cut.. Do you claim support for your energy bills? Alex Morris, "My employer pays the cost" Alex Norris MP SR, "You earn £91,000 plus ministerial salary of £30,000, wouldn't the better 'difficult decision' be to take the allowance away from MPs who can afford it, than form pensioners on £12-13,000 a year?" AM, "The way employees are treated should be the same irrespective of the job that you do" SR, "Shouldn't public money be spent on those who can least afford it than on those who can most afford it?" AM, "Well indeed" SR, "Do you know have any qualms to say it was a difficult decision to take £300 away from pensioners on low income when you are a highly paid MP and minister who still claims public money for your energy bills?" AM, "The decision we took was the right one"

Susanna Reid, "10 million pensioners affected by the winter fuel allowance cut.. Do you claim support for your energy bills? Alex Morris, "My employer pays the cost" Alex Norris MP SR, "You earn £91,000 plus ministerial salary of £30,000, wouldn't the better 'difficult decision' be to take the allowance away from MPs who can afford it, than form pensioners on £12-13,000 a year?" AM, "The way employees are treated should be the same irrespective of the job that you do" SR, "Shouldn't public money be spent on those who can least afford it than on those who can most afford it?" AM, "Well indeed" SR, "Do you know have any qualms to say it was a difficult decision to take £300 away from pensioners on low income when you are a highly paid MP and minister who still claims public money for your energy bills?" AM, "The decision we took was the right one"

Farrukh

1,305,818 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce