正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

THE LOTTO SECRECY FILES What Ithuba Changed Originally, when Ithuba took over from Gidani (2015), lotto draws were aired live on SABC the traditional, highly visible way. Around 2018–2019, Ithuba quietly shifted the draws to YouTube / digital channels, framing it as modernization. •Today: •Ticket sales close at 20:30....

goolammv's profile picture

Goolam

150,325 subscribers

75,430 次观看 • 9 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育财经
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

THE LOTTO SCANDAL NOBODY WANTS TO TOUCH Charmaine Mabuza’s Ithuba runs a multi billion rand lottery under a licence extended twice. Once it was transparent live TV draws, clear rules. Now? No live broadcasts. Ticket sales cut off at 8:30pm, even thou the actual draw is about 27mins later and the “draw” only released after a 5-minute blackout. Staff whisper about rigging. Auditors give her cover, but SA knows the Zondo story: auditors signed off on state capture loot. Big media stay silent their pockets lined with Lotto ad money with huge advertising deals. So the question is simple: WHAT IS CHARMAINE MABUZA HIDING?
0:24

THE LOTTO SCANDAL NOBODY WANTS TO TOUCH Charmaine Mabuza’s Ithuba runs a multi billion rand lottery under a licence extended twice. Once it was transparent live TV draws, clear rules. Now? No live broadcasts. Ticket sales cut off at 8:30pm, even thou the actual draw is about 27mins later and the “draw” only released after a 5-minute blackout. Staff whisper about rigging. Auditors give her cover, but SA knows the Zondo story: auditors signed off on state capture loot. Big media stay silent their pockets lined with Lotto ad money with huge advertising deals. So the question is simple: WHAT IS CHARMAINE MABUZA HIDING?

Goolam

36,907 次观看 • 10 个月前

They took this man’s property… not because they needed it… but because they wanted it. He built something worth roughly $400,000… his land, his investment, his future. The county steps in under eminent domain… claims it’s for a fire station. Public use. Public good. Sounds clean… sounds lawful. But watch what actually happened. They forced him out… cut him a check for $175,000. Not market value. Not fair value. Half. Then… just months later… They flip the same property. No fire station. No public use. Luxury development. And suddenly that same land is worth hundreds of thousands more… A $675,000 gain… off land they took from a private citizen under the authority of the government. That’s not development. That’s not planning. That’s conversion of private property using state power. And here’s where it gets serious… A judge steps in… looks at the facts… and says what should’ve been said from the beginning: You cannot take someone’s property under eminent domain for one purpose…and then turn around and use it for something completely different just to make money. So what happens next? The court doesn’t just slap the city on the wrist. The judge orders them to make it right. Not politically right… not cosmetically right… Legally right. That means undoing the damage… compensating based on actual value… because what was taken wasn’t just land……it was equity… leverage… opportunity… and control over one’s own future. This is what people miss about eminent domain. It’s one of the most powerful tools government has…and when it’s abused… it stops being public service and starts looking like state-sanctioned taking for profit. If the facts are as stated… the court saw it for exactly what it was. Not a mistake. A misuse of power. And that’s why the ruling hit as hard as it did. #AStoneGroove
1:40

They took this man’s property… not because they needed it… but because they wanted it. He built something worth roughly $400,000… his land, his investment, his future. The county steps in under eminent domain… claims it’s for a fire station. Public use. Public good. Sounds clean… sounds lawful. But watch what actually happened. They forced him out… cut him a check for $175,000. Not market value. Not fair value. Half. Then… just months later… They flip the same property. No fire station. No public use. Luxury development. And suddenly that same land is worth hundreds of thousands more… A $675,000 gain… off land they took from a private citizen under the authority of the government. That’s not development. That’s not planning. That’s conversion of private property using state power. And here’s where it gets serious… A judge steps in… looks at the facts… and says what should’ve been said from the beginning: You cannot take someone’s property under eminent domain for one purpose…and then turn around and use it for something completely different just to make money. So what happens next? The court doesn’t just slap the city on the wrist. The judge orders them to make it right. Not politically right… not cosmetically right… Legally right. That means undoing the damage… compensating based on actual value… because what was taken wasn’t just land……it was equity… leverage… opportunity… and control over one’s own future. This is what people miss about eminent domain. It’s one of the most powerful tools government has…and when it’s abused… it stops being public service and starts looking like state-sanctioned taking for profit. If the facts are as stated… the court saw it for exactly what it was. Not a mistake. A misuse of power. And that’s why the ruling hit as hard as it did. #AStoneGroove

A Gene Robinson

197,320 次观看 • 3 个月前

🇨🇦🍞📈 : Pierre Poilievre once again spends his entire Question period time asking Mark Carney about food inflation & the industrial carbon tax. 💉No mention of why Canada needs to hide vaccine injury data for 15 years, from the public. 🙈If the government wanted people to trust vaccines, why would they hide data on vaccine injuries? Why wouldn't Pierre Poilievre address this issue, right out of the gate? This is what I mean when I say the CPC are going through the motions. This is what I mean when I say the CPC are ignoring numerous issues that could hurt the Liberal credibility, while asking the same things over & over & over & over & over & over again. Is it any wonder Mark Carney is doing so well in the polls? The CPC are not addressing all the scandals and abuses of the government, the way they were pre 2025. The CPC were leading the polls bigtime in 2024 when they addressed all the corruption in the Liberal party. Now the CPC are ignoring all that corruption and giving all the Liberals who stole billions of dollars, a free pass. This is weak leadership. I am not scared to call it out.
1:03

🇨🇦🍞📈 : Pierre Poilievre once again spends his entire Question period time asking Mark Carney about food inflation & the industrial carbon tax. 💉No mention of why Canada needs to hide vaccine injury data for 15 years, from the public. 🙈If the government wanted people to trust vaccines, why would they hide data on vaccine injuries? Why wouldn't Pierre Poilievre address this issue, right out of the gate? This is what I mean when I say the CPC are going through the motions. This is what I mean when I say the CPC are ignoring numerous issues that could hurt the Liberal credibility, while asking the same things over & over & over & over & over & over again. Is it any wonder Mark Carney is doing so well in the polls? The CPC are not addressing all the scandals and abuses of the government, the way they were pre 2025. The CPC were leading the polls bigtime in 2024 when they addressed all the corruption in the Liberal party. Now the CPC are ignoring all that corruption and giving all the Liberals who stole billions of dollars, a free pass. This is weak leadership. I am not scared to call it out.

Bruce McGonigal

22,307 次观看 • 5 个月前

MS NOW host Symone Sanders Townsend recounts how poor security was at the WHCD. She says she was able to roll up to the front door on a scooter and security did not ask to see her ID nor see her ticket, they assumed she was a guest at the hotel: "I actually showed up to the Hilton shortly after 8 P.M. And I actually took a scooter right up to the front of the Hilton driveway. And this matters because, as you know, usually there's a lot of protesters outside that's outside of those barricades before you can actually enter into the driveway of the Hilton. But this year, there are no protesters outside. I come to find out the people were actually milling about into the lobby. When I got off of the scooter and into in front of the barricade, usually you have to show ID and a ticket. The folks, the security at the gate, these were not agents, the Secret Service agents. They were not identified as Secret Service agents that I could see at the gate, but they did not ask me to show ID, and they did not ask me to show a ticket. They said, 'Oh, you're good. I'm sure you're going to your room.' I am not staying at the Washington Hilton. As I entered into the driveway, I saw the president's vehicle. The Beast was driving around in the circle of the Hilton driveway, and people walking around near it, taking photos. Secret Service was not keeping a perimeter. And it went around about two or three times while I was outside. When I entered into the Hilton, I asked Secret Service agents, which I saw they were identified as Secret Service agents, which way the ballroom was, and they said they didn't know. When I finally got my way onto elevator, no one asked me to show ID. No one asked me to show a ticket. I got all the way down to the red carpet area without ever showing a ticket to anyone in the Hilton. I am saying it like this because this is unusual."
1:52

MS NOW host Symone Sanders Townsend recounts how poor security was at the WHCD. She says she was able to roll up to the front door on a scooter and security did not ask to see her ID nor see her ticket, they assumed she was a guest at the hotel: "I actually showed up to the Hilton shortly after 8 P.M. And I actually took a scooter right up to the front of the Hilton driveway. And this matters because, as you know, usually there's a lot of protesters outside that's outside of those barricades before you can actually enter into the driveway of the Hilton. But this year, there are no protesters outside. I come to find out the people were actually milling about into the lobby. When I got off of the scooter and into in front of the barricade, usually you have to show ID and a ticket. The folks, the security at the gate, these were not agents, the Secret Service agents. They were not identified as Secret Service agents that I could see at the gate, but they did not ask me to show ID, and they did not ask me to show a ticket. They said, 'Oh, you're good. I'm sure you're going to your room.' I am not staying at the Washington Hilton. As I entered into the driveway, I saw the president's vehicle. The Beast was driving around in the circle of the Hilton driveway, and people walking around near it, taking photos. Secret Service was not keeping a perimeter. And it went around about two or three times while I was outside. When I entered into the Hilton, I asked Secret Service agents, which I saw they were identified as Secret Service agents, which way the ballroom was, and they said they didn't know. When I finally got my way onto elevator, no one asked me to show ID. No one asked me to show a ticket. I got all the way down to the red carpet area without ever showing a ticket to anyone in the Hilton. I am saying it like this because this is unusual."

Nicholas Fondacaro

508,488 次观看 • 2 个月前

There’s been times when I’m walking or hiking in the woods and I hear knocking coming a building, it gives me an eerie vibe like a trapped in the woods kind of feeling. I know I post about this stuff a bit but it truly fascinates me. Like how this man is hearing knocking on the ground in the woods like something underneath him is knocking but it’s solid ground right? The only logical explanation I can think of is it’s reverb from construction or possibly pipes on the ground being worked on. I was at the state park getting a jog in, the surrounding area was flat, I could see far on either side of me. The fields were clear of trees like a new developmental lot. I didn’t have my headphones on, I decided just to go for a jog without them. During the jog it was quiet, except for the sounds of the wildlife, I could tell they were there, it didn’t bother me. However as I progressed I started hearing a screeching noise, it didn’t sound like any animal to me, almost like old metal on metal brakes of a car ready to fail is how I would describe it. I wasn’t worried because as I said before, the area I was at was clear, it wasn’t as if anybody could be hiding along my path, it was just empty, but what made it weird is I couldn’t pinpoint where the noise was and it sounded close yet I couldn’t see anything that could be the source. Just a dirt path and grass. There were trees along the horizon but they were far, too far for that noise to be so close. For the rest of the job I kept my eyes open but to this day I still couldn’t explain what that noise was.
0:43

There’s been times when I’m walking or hiking in the woods and I hear knocking coming a building, it gives me an eerie vibe like a trapped in the woods kind of feeling. I know I post about this stuff a bit but it truly fascinates me. Like how this man is hearing knocking on the ground in the woods like something underneath him is knocking but it’s solid ground right? The only logical explanation I can think of is it’s reverb from construction or possibly pipes on the ground being worked on. I was at the state park getting a jog in, the surrounding area was flat, I could see far on either side of me. The fields were clear of trees like a new developmental lot. I didn’t have my headphones on, I decided just to go for a jog without them. During the jog it was quiet, except for the sounds of the wildlife, I could tell they were there, it didn’t bother me. However as I progressed I started hearing a screeching noise, it didn’t sound like any animal to me, almost like old metal on metal brakes of a car ready to fail is how I would describe it. I wasn’t worried because as I said before, the area I was at was clear, it wasn’t as if anybody could be hiding along my path, it was just empty, but what made it weird is I couldn’t pinpoint where the noise was and it sounded close yet I couldn’t see anything that could be the source. Just a dirt path and grass. There were trees along the horizon but they were far, too far for that noise to be so close. For the rest of the job I kept my eyes open but to this day I still couldn’t explain what that noise was.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

23,312 次观看 • 9 天前

🛑🇧🇫- Burkina Faso’s PM on how how our gold was being looted. This is what Jean Emmanuel Ouédraogo was saying on national television about our artisanal gold: “Imagine, we were getting less than 500kg of gold. And last year (with SONASP), we almost got 10 tons. However, this year by the month of September alone, it was already 36 tons. In the past, Burkina Faso had no gold reserves at all. They were coming, they were the ones who go down in the mines, no Burkinabè was there. They were the ones who will come out and say, “Ah, this is what we got! And we only had to nod and accept it.” Once it leaves the mines, it goes directly to the airport where a plane ✈️ is waiting for it, and when it’s finally loaded, it takes off and that was it. Nothing stays in the country. Is this acceptable? This is unacceptable! But it’s over now! Even in the big mines they still have, we have our people there to control them, so that everything can be clear, so that if they say this is the amount of tons that we brought out, at least we are all witnesses of it.” - End of quote. I, Marcus or any Burkinabè who is well aware can attest to this. I was living in Kombissiri in the year 2010-2011, and frequently, I could hear the bikers escorting the gold in full speed like a presidential escort heading to Ouagadougou which is just at about 40km from Kombissiri. At first, I didn’t know it was gold being transported. Until one day, I asked the neighbors and the police and they told me it was gold going to the airport. I was like damn! People are looting our gold! I don’t remember the name of the mine they told me, but Kombissiri was the route they were following. So, this confirms what the PM is saying. But thank God for Capitaine Ibrahim TRAORÉ ! We have none of that shit anymore.
1:25

🛑🇧🇫- Burkina Faso’s PM on how how our gold was being looted. This is what Jean Emmanuel Ouédraogo was saying on national television about our artisanal gold: “Imagine, we were getting less than 500kg of gold. And last year (with SONASP), we almost got 10 tons. However, this year by the month of September alone, it was already 36 tons. In the past, Burkina Faso had no gold reserves at all. They were coming, they were the ones who go down in the mines, no Burkinabè was there. They were the ones who will come out and say, “Ah, this is what we got! And we only had to nod and accept it.” Once it leaves the mines, it goes directly to the airport where a plane ✈️ is waiting for it, and when it’s finally loaded, it takes off and that was it. Nothing stays in the country. Is this acceptable? This is unacceptable! But it’s over now! Even in the big mines they still have, we have our people there to control them, so that everything can be clear, so that if they say this is the amount of tons that we brought out, at least we are all witnesses of it.” - End of quote. I, Marcus or any Burkinabè who is well aware can attest to this. I was living in Kombissiri in the year 2010-2011, and frequently, I could hear the bikers escorting the gold in full speed like a presidential escort heading to Ouagadougou which is just at about 40km from Kombissiri. At first, I didn’t know it was gold being transported. Until one day, I asked the neighbors and the police and they told me it was gold going to the airport. I was like damn! People are looting our gold! I don’t remember the name of the mine they told me, but Kombissiri was the route they were following. So, this confirms what the PM is saying. But thank God for Capitaine Ibrahim TRAORÉ ! We have none of that shit anymore.

Sy Marcus Herve Traore

15,468 次观看 • 7 个月前

Check this out 🧠💭 I’m not saying, “hey! let’s just use AI for the commentary…” and I’m not even sure how/if that would work. BUT 🚨 with commentary being as bad as it is, I can’t be the only one who sometimes prefers to play with commentary turned off, right? So now imagine a presentation package tailored to that — I’m thinking like the no-commentary Skycam coverage we’ve seen in real life. The focus then would be on more authentic stadium/field sounds - and beefing that up. Think about it this way -> that’s how people in the stadium experience games. Then they replay the broadcast at home or watch highlights and hear the best calls of the day. THAT’S 🎯 where I think this AI commentary can come into play.., you’ve already made the plays and fought it out on the field. Now soak in the moment by hearing calls like this 👇 No more awkward live commentary in-game. This way the ai already has the stats and context, so now you just get to put it in broadcast view, sit back and rewind. You get to watch what the viewers saw on screen when you were on the field. And it finally sounds like a natural, believable, and dramatic “live broadcast” call. This is just the start…
0:42

Check this out 🧠💭 I’m not saying, “hey! let’s just use AI for the commentary…” and I’m not even sure how/if that would work. BUT 🚨 with commentary being as bad as it is, I can’t be the only one who sometimes prefers to play with commentary turned off, right? So now imagine a presentation package tailored to that — I’m thinking like the no-commentary Skycam coverage we’ve seen in real life. The focus then would be on more authentic stadium/field sounds - and beefing that up. Think about it this way -> that’s how people in the stadium experience games. Then they replay the broadcast at home or watch highlights and hear the best calls of the day. THAT’S 🎯 where I think this AI commentary can come into play.., you’ve already made the plays and fought it out on the field. Now soak in the moment by hearing calls like this 👇 No more awkward live commentary in-game. This way the ai already has the stats and context, so now you just get to put it in broadcast view, sit back and rewind. You get to watch what the viewers saw on screen when you were on the field. And it finally sounds like a natural, believable, and dramatic “live broadcast” call. This is just the start…

PAC

32,144 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨 SOMETHING STRANGE IS HAPPENING TO THE MOON — AND THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO NOTICE A woman gets on camera and says this isn’t a one-time thing. She saw it last month, the moon looked completely off, like the orientation made no sense, but she brushed it off and kept it moving. Now it’s happening again. Same exact look. So this time she actually checks, pulls up NASA charts for her exact location and shows what the moon is supposed to look like… and what she’s seeing doesn’t match it, not even close. The charts show it side to side, but what everyone actually saw was a flipped moon, straight up upside down, like something changed and everyone’s acting like it didn’t. Then she calls people across the country to verify it, and they come back saying the same thing. It looks upside down to them too, which is where this stops being “just her” and starts feeling like the same exact thing showing up in multiple places at the same time. And it’s not just her, people all over social media are saying the same thing: "Something isn't right." And this is where it stops making any sense. She says if the moon is a crescent, you’re only supposed to see the lit part… so why can she still see the entire outline of it, faint but clearly there, like the shadow isn’t even doing what it’s supposed to do? And she’s already calling it out before anyone can spin it: don’t say it’s lighting, don’t say it’s angle, don’t say it’s photoshopped, because she checked the charts, showed the receipts, and had other people confirm it. So now you’ve got the same “flip,” the same upside down moon, same visibility issue, second month in a row, multiple locations… and it still doesn’t match what we’re being shown. She ignored it once. Now it’s back again. So what exactly are we looking at… and why does it feel like we’re not supposed to question it?
2:31

🚨 SOMETHING STRANGE IS HAPPENING TO THE MOON — AND THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO NOTICE A woman gets on camera and says this isn’t a one-time thing. She saw it last month, the moon looked completely off, like the orientation made no sense, but she brushed it off and kept it moving. Now it’s happening again. Same exact look. So this time she actually checks, pulls up NASA charts for her exact location and shows what the moon is supposed to look like… and what she’s seeing doesn’t match it, not even close. The charts show it side to side, but what everyone actually saw was a flipped moon, straight up upside down, like something changed and everyone’s acting like it didn’t. Then she calls people across the country to verify it, and they come back saying the same thing. It looks upside down to them too, which is where this stops being “just her” and starts feeling like the same exact thing showing up in multiple places at the same time. And it’s not just her, people all over social media are saying the same thing: "Something isn't right." And this is where it stops making any sense. She says if the moon is a crescent, you’re only supposed to see the lit part… so why can she still see the entire outline of it, faint but clearly there, like the shadow isn’t even doing what it’s supposed to do? And she’s already calling it out before anyone can spin it: don’t say it’s lighting, don’t say it’s angle, don’t say it’s photoshopped, because she checked the charts, showed the receipts, and had other people confirm it. So now you’ve got the same “flip,” the same upside down moon, same visibility issue, second month in a row, multiple locations… and it still doesn’t match what we’re being shown. She ignored it once. Now it’s back again. So what exactly are we looking at… and why does it feel like we’re not supposed to question it?

HustleBitch

729,943 次观看 • 3 个月前

JACQUI TIME (Jacqui Heinrich): “Based on your analysis so far, do you have a sense of who is at fault? If it was plane, the helicopter, air traffic control? And can you assure people that it is safe to fly in and out of DC?” Trump: “Well, I've given you the analysis and the analysis was — was based on vision. You got a lot of people that saw what was happening. You had some people that knew what was happening. There were some warnings, but the warnings were given very, very late. You know, those warnings were given very late. It was almost as they were given a few seconds later, was a crash — should have been brought up earlier, but the people and the helicopters should have seen where they were going. I can't imagine people with 20/20 vision not seeing, you know, what's happening up there. Again, they shouldn't have been at the same — if you're going with — in reverse directions or sideways directions, obviously, you want to be at different heights. I see it all the time when I'm flying. I — you have planes going in the opposite. They're always lower or higher or — so if somehow there’s a screw up, there's not going to be a tragedy. It'll be close, but you know, there's never going to be a tragedy if you're in a different elevation. For whatever reason, they were at the same elevation and also from the American Airlines center, he's along the track that every plane is along. You say what was a helicopter doing in that track? Very sad, but visually, somebody should have been able to see and taken that helicopter out of play and they should have been at a different height.”
1:44

JACQUI TIME (Jacqui Heinrich): “Based on your analysis so far, do you have a sense of who is at fault? If it was plane, the helicopter, air traffic control? And can you assure people that it is safe to fly in and out of DC?” Trump: “Well, I've given you the analysis and the analysis was — was based on vision. You got a lot of people that saw what was happening. You had some people that knew what was happening. There were some warnings, but the warnings were given very, very late. You know, those warnings were given very late. It was almost as they were given a few seconds later, was a crash — should have been brought up earlier, but the people and the helicopters should have seen where they were going. I can't imagine people with 20/20 vision not seeing, you know, what's happening up there. Again, they shouldn't have been at the same — if you're going with — in reverse directions or sideways directions, obviously, you want to be at different heights. I see it all the time when I'm flying. I — you have planes going in the opposite. They're always lower or higher or — so if somehow there’s a screw up, there's not going to be a tragedy. It'll be close, but you know, there's never going to be a tragedy if you're in a different elevation. For whatever reason, they were at the same elevation and also from the American Airlines center, he's along the track that every plane is along. You say what was a helicopter doing in that track? Very sad, but visually, somebody should have been able to see and taken that helicopter out of play and they should have been at a different height.”

Curtis Houck

11,692 次观看 • 1 年前

"But what is a mental image? Not for the last time, I got caught up, when I was in graduate school, in a raging controversy called the imagery debate. And this was a debate over the format of mental imagery. Now, everyone reports the experience of a mental picture, and that’s the way we describe it in English. But, of course, there isn’t a real picture in the brain. It isn’t as if there’s a little man sitting in a theater who’s looking at a screen. The behaviorists were right about this. How do we make sense of what’s going on in people’s heads when they say they have a mental picture? The easiest way to make sense of it is to use the concept from computer science of an image file—basically, an array of pixels, as we would now call them. And my graduate advisor, Stephen Kosslyn, came up with what at the time was a revolutionary theory: that images were like image files in a computer." I'll be saying more about the workings of the human mind in February 2026 in Australia and New Zealand. Thinkable
1:02

"But what is a mental image? Not for the last time, I got caught up, when I was in graduate school, in a raging controversy called the imagery debate. And this was a debate over the format of mental imagery. Now, everyone reports the experience of a mental picture, and that’s the way we describe it in English. But, of course, there isn’t a real picture in the brain. It isn’t as if there’s a little man sitting in a theater who’s looking at a screen. The behaviorists were right about this. How do we make sense of what’s going on in people’s heads when they say they have a mental picture? The easiest way to make sense of it is to use the concept from computer science of an image file—basically, an array of pixels, as we would now call them. And my graduate advisor, Stephen Kosslyn, came up with what at the time was a revolutionary theory: that images were like image files in a computer." I'll be saying more about the workings of the human mind in February 2026 in Australia and New Zealand. Thinkable

Steven Pinker

113,593 次观看 • 8 个月前

🚨 US-IRAN PEACE DEAL IS ABOUT TO COLLAPSE... And the markets don't fully understand what that means yet. Iran just closed the Strait of Hormuz again. Not a warning, Not a threat, Closed. In direct response to Israeli strikes on Lebanon. The same strikes that happened while peace negotiations were still technically on the table. The same table that just got flipped. Insiders are already saying it out loud: the peace deal is collapsing. Everything the market priced in over the last two weeks the ceasefire premium. The Hormuz reopening rally, the oil selloff, the risk-on rotation gets unwound. All these events happened at the same time. Here's what closes through the Strait of Hormuz: 20% of global oil supply every day gone. JUST IMAGINE. 20 PERCENT. The oil drop that happened on peace deal optimism was one of the fastest moves in months. The reversal of that move will be just as fast. Except in the other direction. But oil is just the beginning. Risk assets were already fragile before this. The S&P 500 concentrated in eight names. Bitcoin sitting at a level where bull traps end. Leverage everywhere, retail fully positioned for the soft landing scenario. There is no soft landing scenario anymore. Geopolitical risk just came back harder than it left. And markets that priced out that risk over the last two weeks now have to price it back in overnight. With no orderly exit. Energy spikes, safe havens get bought, High-beta tech gets sold first. Crypto follows within hours. The crowd that celebrated the peace deal last week is the same crowd that's now holding the bag. This is not a dip, this is a regime change. Everything changes from here. This sounds SCARY, but I will keep you updated on everything here When I rotate money, I will post my moves here so my FOLLOWERS can SAVE their money Follow me and turn NOTIFICATIONS ON, as I will share my strategy soon Many will regret not following me earlier...
0:37

🚨 US-IRAN PEACE DEAL IS ABOUT TO COLLAPSE... And the markets don't fully understand what that means yet. Iran just closed the Strait of Hormuz again. Not a warning, Not a threat, Closed. In direct response to Israeli strikes on Lebanon. The same strikes that happened while peace negotiations were still technically on the table. The same table that just got flipped. Insiders are already saying it out loud: the peace deal is collapsing. Everything the market priced in over the last two weeks the ceasefire premium. The Hormuz reopening rally, the oil selloff, the risk-on rotation gets unwound. All these events happened at the same time. Here's what closes through the Strait of Hormuz: 20% of global oil supply every day gone. JUST IMAGINE. 20 PERCENT. The oil drop that happened on peace deal optimism was one of the fastest moves in months. The reversal of that move will be just as fast. Except in the other direction. But oil is just the beginning. Risk assets were already fragile before this. The S&P 500 concentrated in eight names. Bitcoin sitting at a level where bull traps end. Leverage everywhere, retail fully positioned for the soft landing scenario. There is no soft landing scenario anymore. Geopolitical risk just came back harder than it left. And markets that priced out that risk over the last two weeks now have to price it back in overnight. With no orderly exit. Energy spikes, safe havens get bought, High-beta tech gets sold first. Crypto follows within hours. The crowd that celebrated the peace deal last week is the same crowd that's now holding the bag. This is not a dip, this is a regime change. Everything changes from here. This sounds SCARY, but I will keep you updated on everything here When I rotate money, I will post my moves here so my FOLLOWERS can SAVE their money Follow me and turn NOTIFICATIONS ON, as I will share my strategy soon Many will regret not following me earlier...

ᴛʀᴀᴄᴇʀ

153,632 次观看 • 25 天前

During a segment on the French news channel LCI, analyst Gallagher Fenwick dropped a truth bomb that really stings. If you were to rank the attendees of the recent Florida meeting by their alleged level of corruption, Jared Kushner and Witkoff would effortlessly snag the gold medal! “What is interesting is that for this sequence, you started from an image—the one that was unfolding a few hours ago in Florida—where we have the Americans facing the Ukrainians. Well, in this comparison, if you want to use corruption as a yardstick for measuring the characters you have there, well, I'm sorry, but in the game of the most corrupt, I am not certain that the Ukrainians are the worst, especially those around the table, compared to Jared Kushner or once again Steve Witkoff, who are in the process of completely normalising the practice of conflict of interest at the highest levels of the State. And when you look at the rankings, particularly regarding corruption, well, the Americans, who used to be good, are becoming frankly average—that's not me saying it, it's Transparency International—and the Ukrainians, who were frankly not very good, have doubled their score in recent years. It is still very much below the world average, but it is progressing, while on the American side, it is regressing.”
0:55

During a segment on the French news channel LCI, analyst Gallagher Fenwick dropped a truth bomb that really stings. If you were to rank the attendees of the recent Florida meeting by their alleged level of corruption, Jared Kushner and Witkoff would effortlessly snag the gold medal! “What is interesting is that for this sequence, you started from an image—the one that was unfolding a few hours ago in Florida—where we have the Americans facing the Ukrainians. Well, in this comparison, if you want to use corruption as a yardstick for measuring the characters you have there, well, I'm sorry, but in the game of the most corrupt, I am not certain that the Ukrainians are the worst, especially those around the table, compared to Jared Kushner or once again Steve Witkoff, who are in the process of completely normalising the practice of conflict of interest at the highest levels of the State. And when you look at the rankings, particularly regarding corruption, well, the Americans, who used to be good, are becoming frankly average—that's not me saying it, it's Transparency International—and the Ukrainians, who were frankly not very good, have doubled their score in recent years. It is still very much below the world average, but it is progressing, while on the American side, it is regressing.”

Yasmina

51,556 次观看 • 7 个月前

Trump Comments on the Drones and Cancels his Trip to Bedminster, NJ— But Pay Attention to what he says at the end When asked if he received any Intel briefings on the drones, he says I don’t wanna comment on that. Do you think he’s worried at all? “The Government knows what is happening… Look, our military knows where they took off from. If it’s a garage, they can go right into that garage… They know where it came from and where it went. And for some reason they don’t want to comment… and I think they’d be better off saying what it is… our military knows and our president knows. And for some reason they want to keep people in suspense. I can’t imagine it’s the enemy, because if it’s the enemy, they’d blast it out… even if they were late, they’d blast it. Something strange is going on, and for some reason they don’t want to tell the people. They happen to be over Bedminster, they’re very close to Bedminster. I think maybe I won’t spend the weekend in Bedminster.”
1:02

Trump Comments on the Drones and Cancels his Trip to Bedminster, NJ— But Pay Attention to what he says at the end When asked if he received any Intel briefings on the drones, he says I don’t wanna comment on that. Do you think he’s worried at all? “The Government knows what is happening… Look, our military knows where they took off from. If it’s a garage, they can go right into that garage… They know where it came from and where it went. And for some reason they don’t want to comment… and I think they’d be better off saying what it is… our military knows and our president knows. And for some reason they want to keep people in suspense. I can’t imagine it’s the enemy, because if it’s the enemy, they’d blast it out… even if they were late, they’d blast it. Something strange is going on, and for some reason they don’t want to tell the people. They happen to be over Bedminster, they’re very close to Bedminster. I think maybe I won’t spend the weekend in Bedminster.”

MJTruthUltra

344,115 次观看 • 1 年前

At the WEF 2025, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez presented a vision for the digital future that should send a chill down the spine of every free citizen. Framed as a solution to online harms, his proposal is, in reality, a blueprint for a panopticon of digital control, perfectly aligned with the globalist agenda of the World Economic Forum. What Sánchez Said: He called for an end to online anonymity, demanding that every social media profile in Europe be linked to a state-issued "European Digital Identity Wallet." He compared the internet to public streets, arguing that just as one cannot drive without a license plate, one should not post online without a state-verified ID. What Sánchez Is Really Saying: He is declaring that the digital public square—the last truly global space for free, unvetted discourse—must be brought under the direct supervision of the state. His rhetoric is a masterclass in misdirection: - "Fighting misinformation" is code for establishing a verifiable identity for dissent. Under this system, any opinion deemed inconvenient by the authorities can be traced directly back to the citizen who voiced it. - "Ending cyber-harassment" is the pretext for ending digital privacy. The principle that one can speak without fear of state retribution is being reclassified as "impunity." - "Pseudonymity" is a Trojan horse. It offers the illusion of a nickname while ensuring that a government database holds the key to your real identity, accessible whenever "public authorities" deem your speech a "crime." This is not pseudonymity; it is state-mandated identity registration for speech. This is the ultimate goal of the WEF's "Great Reset" and "Digital ID" agenda: not safety, but control. It creates a system where participation in modern society is contingent on accepting a government-issued digital leash. The threat of being "banned or prosecuted" for undefined crimes will inevitably lead to self-censorship, silencing legitimate criticism and neutralizing opposition. Sanchez's second proposal—to "force open the black box of algorithms"—completes the picture. It is not about transparency for users, but about regulatory capture for the state. The goal is for governments to dictate what content is amplified and what is suppressed, shaping public opinion under the guise of managing "the public conversation." This is not the path to a safer internet. It is the path to a sterile, state-managed internet where freedom is traded for the false promise of security. The globalist elite at the WEF are not solving the problems of the digital age; they are exploiting them to build the architecture of control.
2:38

At the WEF 2025, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez presented a vision for the digital future that should send a chill down the spine of every free citizen. Framed as a solution to online harms, his proposal is, in reality, a blueprint for a panopticon of digital control, perfectly aligned with the globalist agenda of the World Economic Forum. What Sánchez Said: He called for an end to online anonymity, demanding that every social media profile in Europe be linked to a state-issued "European Digital Identity Wallet." He compared the internet to public streets, arguing that just as one cannot drive without a license plate, one should not post online without a state-verified ID. What Sánchez Is Really Saying: He is declaring that the digital public square—the last truly global space for free, unvetted discourse—must be brought under the direct supervision of the state. His rhetoric is a masterclass in misdirection: - "Fighting misinformation" is code for establishing a verifiable identity for dissent. Under this system, any opinion deemed inconvenient by the authorities can be traced directly back to the citizen who voiced it. - "Ending cyber-harassment" is the pretext for ending digital privacy. The principle that one can speak without fear of state retribution is being reclassified as "impunity." - "Pseudonymity" is a Trojan horse. It offers the illusion of a nickname while ensuring that a government database holds the key to your real identity, accessible whenever "public authorities" deem your speech a "crime." This is not pseudonymity; it is state-mandated identity registration for speech. This is the ultimate goal of the WEF's "Great Reset" and "Digital ID" agenda: not safety, but control. It creates a system where participation in modern society is contingent on accepting a government-issued digital leash. The threat of being "banned or prosecuted" for undefined crimes will inevitably lead to self-censorship, silencing legitimate criticism and neutralizing opposition. Sanchez's second proposal—to "force open the black box of algorithms"—completes the picture. It is not about transparency for users, but about regulatory capture for the state. The goal is for governments to dictate what content is amplified and what is suppressed, shaping public opinion under the guise of managing "the public conversation." This is not the path to a safer internet. It is the path to a sterile, state-managed internet where freedom is traded for the false promise of security. The globalist elite at the WEF are not solving the problems of the digital age; they are exploiting them to build the architecture of control.

Camus

182,116 次观看 • 9 个月前

Henry on how nearly all market returns come from 1% of companies: "There's 4,000 public stocks. How many of them truly are great? Over a rolling 10 year period, you have about 40 stocks that compound wealth at 20% a year or go up ~6x. So about 1%. I read the shareholder letters and tried to understand what drove the success of the New Horizon Fund. It was really only 20 stocks over 50 years that drove the performance. Walmart first came public as a super small company. And this is definitely one of the 20 stocks that mattered. But, unfortunately, it was sold. I was managing about $8 billion, and had the stake in Walmart not been sold, it would have been greater than the sum total of everything that I was managing. I love small cap companies because I love the people side of the job, but I also love them because 80% of these great companies actually start as small caps."
2:25

Henry on how nearly all market returns come from 1% of companies: "There's 4,000 public stocks. How many of them truly are great? Over a rolling 10 year period, you have about 40 stocks that compound wealth at 20% a year or go up ~6x. So about 1%. I read the shareholder letters and tried to understand what drove the success of the New Horizon Fund. It was really only 20 stocks over 50 years that drove the performance. Walmart first came public as a super small company. And this is definitely one of the 20 stocks that mattered. But, unfortunately, it was sold. I was managing about $8 billion, and had the stake in Walmart not been sold, it would have been greater than the sum total of everything that I was managing. I love small cap companies because I love the people side of the job, but I also love them because 80% of these great companies actually start as small caps."

Patrick OShaughnessy

197,613 次观看 • 7 个月前

My Honest Account of what happened last night. I arrived at Epsom expecting to see maybe 20/30 people there. It was only a flash demo after all. But such is the anger and feeling of betrayal in Epsom that there were several hundred people at the station. There were not many police either.They had been caught on the hop.We marched off in a peaceful manor. No shouting. No singing.When we reached the junction we decided this was as good a place as any to hold our protest. We held the traffic up.But I did not hear one motorist complain.Most were locals and were giving us the thumbs up from their cars.Everything was peaceful.And orderly. Then as van after van of riot police started to arrive the atmosphere turned a bit. It was a total overreaction by boys in blue.And one that I have not seen at other demos such as the pro pally mobs that have plagued our streets for the last couple of years. Any major trouble was only averted by the leadership of our guys at the front calling for calm. All we were asking for was a bit of honesty and a bit of dialogue.We were met with riot shields. Well done to the people of Epsom. Shame on the police.
0:39

My Honest Account of what happened last night. I arrived at Epsom expecting to see maybe 20/30 people there. It was only a flash demo after all. But such is the anger and feeling of betrayal in Epsom that there were several hundred people at the station. There were not many police either.They had been caught on the hop.We marched off in a peaceful manor. No shouting. No singing.When we reached the junction we decided this was as good a place as any to hold our protest. We held the traffic up.But I did not hear one motorist complain.Most were locals and were giving us the thumbs up from their cars.Everything was peaceful.And orderly. Then as van after van of riot police started to arrive the atmosphere turned a bit. It was a total overreaction by boys in blue.And one that I have not seen at other demos such as the pro pally mobs that have plagued our streets for the last couple of years. Any major trouble was only averted by the leadership of our guys at the front calling for calm. All we were asking for was a bit of honesty and a bit of dialogue.We were met with riot shields. Well done to the people of Epsom. Shame on the police.

Tensions Rising🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧

509,201 次观看 • 2 个月前

Seonghwa’s mom spoke about how transparent and honest Seonghwa is with his emotions and how that somehow worries her as his mom 🥺 🗣️: Some people don’t show their emotions or the things they struggle with but Seonghwa shows everything so transparently that, as his mom, it worries me a bit. Maybe I notice it because I’m his mother, I’m not sure… but since I can see it all so clearly, sometimes I wish you wouldn’t express everything so openly and would keep those things inside a little. But Seonghwa really reveals every part of himself so transparently… ⭐️: There are pros and cons to that. During vacations or breaks I used to always share where I was, what I was doing, everything. When I stopped doing that, I realized a lot of people were waiting for my updates and since I’ve always loved in that way, I think that created a bit of a dilemma for me. But I like it this way. On the other hand, if the “on camera”and the “resting-time” person were completely different, that on/off switch would be exhausting I think. But I think the Seonghwa on camera and the Seonghwa off camera are the same Park Seonghwa, so I don’t feel stressed about it. Showing myself as I am was hard at first but as the years went by everything started to fall into place. So now it feels comfortable. #SEONGHWA #성화
1:20

Seonghwa’s mom spoke about how transparent and honest Seonghwa is with his emotions and how that somehow worries her as his mom 🥺 🗣️: Some people don’t show their emotions or the things they struggle with but Seonghwa shows everything so transparently that, as his mom, it worries me a bit. Maybe I notice it because I’m his mother, I’m not sure… but since I can see it all so clearly, sometimes I wish you wouldn’t express everything so openly and would keep those things inside a little. But Seonghwa really reveals every part of himself so transparently… ⭐️: There are pros and cons to that. During vacations or breaks I used to always share where I was, what I was doing, everything. When I stopped doing that, I realized a lot of people were waiting for my updates and since I’ve always loved in that way, I think that created a bit of a dilemma for me. But I like it this way. On the other hand, if the “on camera”and the “resting-time” person were completely different, that on/off switch would be exhausting I think. But I think the Seonghwa on camera and the Seonghwa off camera are the same Park Seonghwa, so I don’t feel stressed about it. Showing myself as I am was hard at first but as the years went by everything started to fall into place. So now it feels comfortable. #SEONGHWA #성화

Everything Seonghwa

52,709 次观看 • 1 个月前