正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

“The Macrohard project probably be our most important project because what we're talking about is emulation of entire human companies. So when you look at the most valuable companies in the world, they are... their output is digital. So they don't actually make hardware. So it should be possible... show more

Dima Zeniuk

123,045 subscribers

41,434 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

ELON MUSK: "The Macrohard project over time actually will probably be our most important project, because what we're talking about is emulation of entire human companies. So when you look at the most valuable companies in the world, their output is digital, so they don't actually make hardware so it should be possible to completely emulate any company where output is digital and this will usher an age of prosperity. This is a big deal and this is why the words Macrohard is painted on the roof of the training cluster, because that's what it's going to build."

ELON MUSK: "The Macrohard project over time actually will probably be our most important project, because what we're talking about is emulation of entire human companies. So when you look at the most valuable companies in the world, their output is digital, so they don't actually make hardware so it should be possible to completely emulate any company where output is digital and this will usher an age of prosperity. This is a big deal and this is why the words Macrohard is painted on the roof of the training cluster, because that's what it's going to build."

DogeDesigner

49,012 次观看 • 4 个月前

Feels like everyone’s telling me to set up OpenClaw… but do I really need to? I feel like it’s just a matter of time before xAI’s Macrohard is going to end up doing it better anyway… especially when Elon says this project is going to emulate entire human companies. “The Macrohard project probably will be our most important project because what we’re talking about is emulation of entire human companies. So when you look at the most valuable companies in the world, they are… their output is digital. So they don’t actually make hardware. So it should be possible to completely emulate any company where the output is digital. And this will usher in an age of prosperity the likes of which we can barely imagine at this point. You need to imagine to imagine it. So this is a big deal…”

Feels like everyone’s telling me to set up OpenClaw… but do I really need to? I feel like it’s just a matter of time before xAI’s Macrohard is going to end up doing it better anyway… especially when Elon says this project is going to emulate entire human companies. “The Macrohard project probably will be our most important project because what we’re talking about is emulation of entire human companies. So when you look at the most valuable companies in the world, they are… their output is digital. So they don’t actually make hardware. So it should be possible to completely emulate any company where the output is digital. And this will usher in an age of prosperity the likes of which we can barely imagine at this point. You need to imagine to imagine it. So this is a big deal…”

Teslaconomics

61,468 次观看 • 5 个月前

🇺🇸 ELON UNVEILS HIS NEW PROJECT WITH xAI: “MACROHARD” “This project is probably our most important, because what we’re talking about is: emulation of entire human companies. When you look at the most valuable companies in the world, their output is digital, so it should be possible to emulate any company where the output is digital. This will usher in an era of prosperity... It's a big deal." Source: Elon Musk

🇺🇸 ELON UNVEILS HIS NEW PROJECT WITH xAI: “MACROHARD” “This project is probably our most important, because what we’re talking about is: emulation of entire human companies. When you look at the most valuable companies in the world, their output is digital, so it should be possible to emulate any company where the output is digital. This will usher in an era of prosperity... It's a big deal." Source: Elon Musk

Mario Nawfal

286,994 次观看 • 5 个月前

Elon Musk isn’t automating jobs. He’s deleting companies. Project Macrohard. Painted on a roof in letters visible from space. Musk calls it the most important thing xAI will build. Musk: “We aren’t just automating tasks. We are automating the corporation.” The insight is surgical: if what you produce is digital, you don’t need to exist. Musk: “It should be possible to completely emulate any company where the output is digital.” The world’s most powerful corporations produce nothing physical. Google doesn’t make objects. Meta doesn’t manufacture. Microsoft ships bits, not atoms. If your product is information, your company is just organized thinking. And thinking can be replicated perfectly at zero cost. Musk: “Their output is digital. So they don’t actually make hardware.” That’s the vulnerability. Every company that doesn’t touch physical reality is just expensive middleware between a problem and a solution. Project Macrohard removes the middleware. No employees. No politics. No overhead. Just function. Pure output at near-zero marginal cost, 24/7, forever. This isn’t about making companies more efficient. It’s about making them unnecessary. The Fortune 500 spent a century optimizing competition against other humans. They have zero defense against entities that don’t sleep, strike, or resign. The largest corporations on Earth are just legacy architecture waiting to be compressed into executable code that does it better, faster, and free.

Elon Musk isn’t automating jobs. He’s deleting companies. Project Macrohard. Painted on a roof in letters visible from space. Musk calls it the most important thing xAI will build. Musk: “We aren’t just automating tasks. We are automating the corporation.” The insight is surgical: if what you produce is digital, you don’t need to exist. Musk: “It should be possible to completely emulate any company where the output is digital.” The world’s most powerful corporations produce nothing physical. Google doesn’t make objects. Meta doesn’t manufacture. Microsoft ships bits, not atoms. If your product is information, your company is just organized thinking. And thinking can be replicated perfectly at zero cost. Musk: “Their output is digital. So they don’t actually make hardware.” That’s the vulnerability. Every company that doesn’t touch physical reality is just expensive middleware between a problem and a solution. Project Macrohard removes the middleware. No employees. No politics. No overhead. Just function. Pure output at near-zero marginal cost, 24/7, forever. This isn’t about making companies more efficient. It’s about making them unnecessary. The Fortune 500 spent a century optimizing competition against other humans. They have zero defense against entities that don’t sleep, strike, or resign. The largest corporations on Earth are just legacy architecture waiting to be compressed into executable code that does it better, faster, and free.

Dustin

356,815 次观看 • 5 个月前

Elon Musk: Currently, the world's most valuable companies have a purely digital output. “The most valuable companies currently by market cap, their output is digital. Nvidia’s output is FTPing files to Taiwan. It’s digital. Those are very, very difficult, high value files. They’re the only ones that can make files that good, but that is literally their output. They send a bitstream to Taiwan. Apple doesn’t make phones. They send files to China. Microsoft doesn’t manufacture anything. Meta’s output is digital. Google’s output is digital. So as soon as you unlock the digital human, you basically have access to trillions of dollars of revenue.” Dwarkesh Podcast, February 5, 2026. Full transcript on Elon Musk Archive.

Elon Musk: Currently, the world's most valuable companies have a purely digital output. “The most valuable companies currently by market cap, their output is digital. Nvidia’s output is FTPing files to Taiwan. It’s digital. Those are very, very difficult, high value files. They’re the only ones that can make files that good, but that is literally their output. They send a bitstream to Taiwan. Apple doesn’t make phones. They send files to China. Microsoft doesn’t manufacture anything. Meta’s output is digital. Google’s output is digital. So as soon as you unlock the digital human, you basically have access to trillions of dollars of revenue.” Dwarkesh Podcast, February 5, 2026. Full transcript on Elon Musk Archive.

ELON CLIPS

47,327 次观看 • 9 天前

Elon Musk on MACROHARD: "I'd be surprised if by end of this year, the digital human emulation has not been solved. That's what we mean by like, the sort of MACROHARD project is, can you do anything that a human with access to a computer could do? That's the best you can do before you have a physical Optimus, the best you can do is a digital Optimus."

Elon Musk on MACROHARD: "I'd be surprised if by end of this year, the digital human emulation has not been solved. That's what we mean by like, the sort of MACROHARD project is, can you do anything that a human with access to a computer could do? That's the best you can do before you have a physical Optimus, the best you can do is a digital Optimus."

DogeDesigner

91,182 次观看 • 5 个月前

$Elon Musk explains the trillion dollar opportunity in AI The idea is simple: “As soon as you unlock digital human, you basically have access to trillions of dollars in revenue” The most valuable companies on Earth (Apple, Google, Microsoft) all produce digital output. So if you have a human emulator you can basically create one of the most valuable companies in the world overnight The simple entry point is a customer service It's 1% of the entire global economy. Most companies already outsource it. There's no complex API integration needed - AI just steps in, does the job better, and charges a fraction of the cost The companies that figure this out first won't just win a market, they'll rewrite the rules of what a company even is$

Elon Musk explains the trillion dollar opportunity in AI The idea is simple: “As soon as you unlock digital human, you basically have access to trillions of dollars in revenue” The most valuable companies on Earth (Apple, Google, Microsoft) all produce digital output. So if you have a human emulator you can basically create one of the most valuable companies in the world overnight The simple entry point is a customer service It's 1% of the entire global economy. Most companies already outsource it. There's no complex API integration needed - AI just steps in, does the job better, and charges a fraction of the cost The companies that figure this out first won't just win a market, they'll rewrite the rules of what a company even is

X Freeze

169,308 次观看 • 4 个月前

"We treat software like it is so precious. And in the new world we're going to, it's going to be much more fungible. But that's the good news." Garry Tan on where the moats will be for future YC companies: "That's where taste, agency, and trust matter a lot. This is something that's only crystallized recently. We've been talking about agency and taste for the longest time. Agency is being able to prompt, and taste is being able to do evals." "Trust is the third thing. It's probably the most important. When you have an enterprise company that is selling to real businesses that are relying on you — that's your moat. Your moat is actually trust. They went through the effort to try you, get you onboarded, and incorporate you into how they work."

"We treat software like it is so precious. And in the new world we're going to, it's going to be much more fungible. But that's the good news." Garry Tan on where the moats will be for future YC companies: "That's where taste, agency, and trust matter a lot. This is something that's only crystallized recently. We've been talking about agency and taste for the longest time. Agency is being able to prompt, and taste is being able to do evals." "Trust is the third thing. It's probably the most important. When you have an enterprise company that is selling to real businesses that are relying on you — that's your moat. Your moat is actually trust. They went through the effort to try you, get you onboarded, and incorporate you into how they work."

TBPN

43,619 次观看 • 3 个月前

The Trump admin is GASLIGHTING us re: no CBDCs They know they can't do CBDCs because of the Constitution, so they're backdooring them with stablecoins Iain Davis explains— "the idea of a [CBDC] is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system" "CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it" "That's not going to work in the US because... it's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote... to coin money" "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work-round" "So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank" "stablecoins... slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency" "Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose, as central bank digital currency" This clip of Iain Davis (InThisTogether), author of The Technocratic Dark State, is taken from a Flashlights podcast (Flashlights Podcast) episode posted to Rumble on May 17, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "It's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote, it says this in the Constitution, to coin money. So the power to coin money is overseen by the people. "Now the idea of a central bank digital currency is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system. That's CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it. "That's not going to work in the US because even though Congress, you know, Congress is the, is the dog which is wagged by the tail in this of the Fed, the Fed, you know, the Fed tells Congress what to do, not the other way round. But theoretically it could be the other way round. And theoretically the people could assert their control over the Fed if they only knew about it, which, not many people do, but they could do it, right? It's in the US Constitution. "Now that's a problem if you're going to embark on a global transformation of the entire international monetary and financial system when your leading reserve currency is the US dollar. So that's, you know, that could all go wrong very badly. "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work round. How are you, how are you going to do which for the, you know, I, for many years, well, since central bank digital currency has been something that I've been looking at, I couldn't figure out why the US wasn't more enthusiastic about central bank digital currency. "Because it's the type of thing that the US administrations are usually right up— You know, they're really gung ho about that kind of centralized control of everything. That's right up their alley. So why, why don't they like it? And then it was the work of John Titus who pointed out this problem that they've got in the US with the Constitution that made me look at that and think, right. And then I started investigating that further. And he's right about that. That is a problem. "But then they obviously need some sort of workaround. How are they going to have. Because the main point of central bank digital currency from the surveillance and control aspect is that we will all need digital identity in order to access our digital wallets, which will contain the currency and the currency and the wallets and our, digital identities will all be programmable so conditions can be set on everything that we do. "Every transaction we make will be subject to condition through some sort of smart contract probably, which will control it. Right. So you know, if you say the wrong thing or you know, you, you just write the wrong thing online, you could be punished by algorithm by controlling your access to money... "And so the key to that is central bank— the programmability of central bank digital currency. But obviously that's not going to, may not work. There's a good chance that won't work in the United States which has got the US dollar reserve is an important currency. "So what are you going to do? So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank. So or in the case of stablecoins, a non-bank, a non-bank institution like Tether. So it's not a bank. "But you can use stablecoins for exactly the same. They slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency. Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose as central bank digital currency or the other version, the commercial bank version is deposit tokens. Any of those will do. "Now in the US they've gone down the stablecoin route so they can issue the stablecoins which will be backed by US Treasuries, just like the dollar or just like any kind of dollar instrument will be one to one convertible for the US dollar. So the stablecoins are effectively the US dollar in, in digital form. "But instead of calling it a central bank digital currency, they call it issued by, it wouldn't have to be issued by the Fed. They call it a stablecoin, which is issued by a company like Tether or you know, someone like that. So it's the same system but using a workaround. And that workaround came with the Genius Act which, which came from an executive order that Trump made when he first came to office. "Because the Americans, quite rightly when they were electing their president, were concerned about central bank digital currency. I mean anyone that understands what it is should be terrified of it. So they didn't want it, and Trump promised that they wouldn't have it. Probably. I don't know whether he knew, but certainly the gaggle of technocrats that were around him knew that they weren't going down that path. Anyway, no chance of the US introducing it because of these problems we've just outlined."

The Trump admin is GASLIGHTING us re: no CBDCs They know they can't do CBDCs because of the Constitution, so they're backdooring them with stablecoins Iain Davis explains— "the idea of a [CBDC] is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system" "CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it" "That's not going to work in the US because... it's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote... to coin money" "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work-round" "So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank" "stablecoins... slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency" "Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose, as central bank digital currency" This clip of Iain Davis (InThisTogether), author of The Technocratic Dark State, is taken from a Flashlights podcast (Flashlights Podcast) episode posted to Rumble on May 17, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "It's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote, it says this in the Constitution, to coin money. So the power to coin money is overseen by the people. "Now the idea of a central bank digital currency is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system. That's CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it. "That's not going to work in the US because even though Congress, you know, Congress is the, is the dog which is wagged by the tail in this of the Fed, the Fed, you know, the Fed tells Congress what to do, not the other way round. But theoretically it could be the other way round. And theoretically the people could assert their control over the Fed if they only knew about it, which, not many people do, but they could do it, right? It's in the US Constitution. "Now that's a problem if you're going to embark on a global transformation of the entire international monetary and financial system when your leading reserve currency is the US dollar. So that's, you know, that could all go wrong very badly. "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work round. How are you, how are you going to do which for the, you know, I, for many years, well, since central bank digital currency has been something that I've been looking at, I couldn't figure out why the US wasn't more enthusiastic about central bank digital currency. "Because it's the type of thing that the US administrations are usually right up— You know, they're really gung ho about that kind of centralized control of everything. That's right up their alley. So why, why don't they like it? And then it was the work of John Titus who pointed out this problem that they've got in the US with the Constitution that made me look at that and think, right. And then I started investigating that further. And he's right about that. That is a problem. "But then they obviously need some sort of workaround. How are they going to have. Because the main point of central bank digital currency from the surveillance and control aspect is that we will all need digital identity in order to access our digital wallets, which will contain the currency and the currency and the wallets and our, digital identities will all be programmable so conditions can be set on everything that we do. "Every transaction we make will be subject to condition through some sort of smart contract probably, which will control it. Right. So you know, if you say the wrong thing or you know, you, you just write the wrong thing online, you could be punished by algorithm by controlling your access to money... "And so the key to that is central bank— the programmability of central bank digital currency. But obviously that's not going to, may not work. There's a good chance that won't work in the United States which has got the US dollar reserve is an important currency. "So what are you going to do? So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank. So or in the case of stablecoins, a non-bank, a non-bank institution like Tether. So it's not a bank. "But you can use stablecoins for exactly the same. They slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency. Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose as central bank digital currency or the other version, the commercial bank version is deposit tokens. Any of those will do. "Now in the US they've gone down the stablecoin route so they can issue the stablecoins which will be backed by US Treasuries, just like the dollar or just like any kind of dollar instrument will be one to one convertible for the US dollar. So the stablecoins are effectively the US dollar in, in digital form. "But instead of calling it a central bank digital currency, they call it issued by, it wouldn't have to be issued by the Fed. They call it a stablecoin, which is issued by a company like Tether or you know, someone like that. So it's the same system but using a workaround. And that workaround came with the Genius Act which, which came from an executive order that Trump made when he first came to office. "Because the Americans, quite rightly when they were electing their president, were concerned about central bank digital currency. I mean anyone that understands what it is should be terrified of it. So they didn't want it, and Trump promised that they wouldn't have it. Probably. I don't know whether he knew, but certainly the gaggle of technocrats that were around him knew that they weren't going down that path. Anyway, no chance of the US introducing it because of these problems we've just outlined."

Sense Receptor

13,996 次观看 • 1 个月前

FOREST ZHOU: Miles is still at MDC because of what? Because he exposed the CCP, because he was telling the truth. That's why we need to protect him. This is not justice. This is legal warfare. This is a weaponized legal system against the people who are trying to bring freedom and democracy to the Chinese people and also trying to save the freeist country in the world. That's why he's so important. So, we need to free Miles because the CCP fears him the most.

FOREST ZHOU: Miles is still at MDC because of what? Because he exposed the CCP, because he was telling the truth. That's why we need to protect him. This is not justice. This is legal warfare. This is a weaponized legal system against the people who are trying to bring freedom and democracy to the Chinese people and also trying to save the freeist country in the world. That's why he's so important. So, we need to free Miles because the CCP fears him the most.

Bannon’s WarRoom

43,863 次观看 • 4 个月前

Gavin on why people misunderstand what makes TSMC so valuable: "One of the most undervalued pieces of the supply chain story is that almost none of these things are buy it once and never talk to the vendor again. You have to go collaborate. That is the most important part of being successful in chips. People look at the tech, and the tech is the best in the world. But the real value is all in the service. TSMC's customer service is way better than I've seen at any company in any industry. If you say, we think you can improve your yield by making this change, they will go run an experiment on their own dime to see if they can get the higher yield. When we found we were right and it worked, they moved it over to the rest of the line. If I go to a steelworks plant and say I want you to change the composition of the steel, they'll say screw you. Not TSMC. It's why they're number one, and why they're going to win."

Gavin on why people misunderstand what makes TSMC so valuable: "One of the most undervalued pieces of the supply chain story is that almost none of these things are buy it once and never talk to the vendor again. You have to go collaborate. That is the most important part of being successful in chips. People look at the tech, and the tech is the best in the world. But the real value is all in the service. TSMC's customer service is way better than I've seen at any company in any industry. If you say, we think you can improve your yield by making this change, they will go run an experiment on their own dime to see if they can get the higher yield. When we found we were right and it worked, they moved it over to the rest of the line. If I go to a steelworks plant and say I want you to change the composition of the steel, they'll say screw you. Not TSMC. It's why they're number one, and why they're going to win."

Invest Like the Best

71,350 次观看 • 15 天前

CBS’s Nathaniel E Burleson on combating anti-Semitism: “[W]hen any group is under attack, you are looking for government intervention, of course, and then also civilian allies. So, as we stand here right now, what can we do to help the Jewish people feel safer?” Tishby: “Thank you so much for actually asking us this question. This is such a beautiful thing and so important. So, listen, first of all, strong language against it. The second thing is strong actions against it. And to be honest, one of the most powerful things that anybody can do, any government, any organization, any group, any company, is adopt what is called the IHRA definition of antisemitism, the International Holocaust Alliance Definition of antisemitism is non- binding, nonlegal definition, the prism from which to see what antisemitism is because a lot of people don’t understand what it is. If you understand what it is as a company, as an organization, as a government, you can actually fight against it. We need to acknowledge, this threat is real, this threat is lethal. It is killing people and we have to stop it.” Burleson: “It is happening.” Tishby: “It has to stop.”

CBS’s Nathaniel E Burleson on combating anti-Semitism: “[W]hen any group is under attack, you are looking for government intervention, of course, and then also civilian allies. So, as we stand here right now, what can we do to help the Jewish people feel safer?” Tishby: “Thank you so much for actually asking us this question. This is such a beautiful thing and so important. So, listen, first of all, strong language against it. The second thing is strong actions against it. And to be honest, one of the most powerful things that anybody can do, any government, any organization, any group, any company, is adopt what is called the IHRA definition of antisemitism, the International Holocaust Alliance Definition of antisemitism is non- binding, nonlegal definition, the prism from which to see what antisemitism is because a lot of people don’t understand what it is. If you understand what it is as a company, as an organization, as a government, you can actually fight against it. We need to acknowledge, this threat is real, this threat is lethal. It is killing people and we have to stop it.” Burleson: “It is happening.” Tishby: “It has to stop.”

Curtis Houck

55,766 次观看 • 7 个月前

Jensen Huang just said this is the greatest era in history to build software. AI agents will not kill software. They will do the exact opposite: create a massive new wave of software demand. at NVIDIA GTC Taipei 2026 "Click and type. We now replace that with explaining to the AI what we want, our intent, and the AI generates the code or uses tools to produce the necessary output. This is how computers are going to work in the future. This is Agentic AI. For two years, we've been building toward this, and now it has arrived. One of the big breakthroughs, of course, is tool use. A lot of people have said, “Jensen, AI is coming. Agentic AI is coming. Therefore, all the software companies are going to go out of business.” This is exactly the opposite. Because there are going to be so many agents, the world is no longer limited by the number of people. Therefore, those agents are going to use more tools than ever. This is actually an incredible time to be a software company. But the software has to be presented to the agent in a way that the agent can use it. This is a big breakthrough. And in fact, what we have done, as you know, what Nvidia’s treasure..." ---- From 'NVIDIA' YT channel (link in comment)

Jensen Huang just said this is the greatest era in history to build software. AI agents will not kill software. They will do the exact opposite: create a massive new wave of software demand. at NVIDIA GTC Taipei 2026 "Click and type. We now replace that with explaining to the AI what we want, our intent, and the AI generates the code or uses tools to produce the necessary output. This is how computers are going to work in the future. This is Agentic AI. For two years, we've been building toward this, and now it has arrived. One of the big breakthroughs, of course, is tool use. A lot of people have said, “Jensen, AI is coming. Agentic AI is coming. Therefore, all the software companies are going to go out of business.” This is exactly the opposite. Because there are going to be so many agents, the world is no longer limited by the number of people. Therefore, those agents are going to use more tools than ever. This is actually an incredible time to be a software company. But the software has to be presented to the agent in a way that the agent can use it. This is a big breakthrough. And in fact, what we have done, as you know, what Nvidia’s treasure..." ---- From 'NVIDIA' YT channel (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

16,584 次观看 • 1 个月前

EVERYONE needs to be aware how SIGNIFICANT the Wisconsin Supreme Court election is This election decides who controls The House of Representatives and Voter ID Elon Musk “The single biggest challenge, I think is actually just making people aware that there is this very important election. There's both the very important election for Judge Schimel as well as the deciding on, on adding voter ID to the Wisconsin Constitution institution, which is very, very important. So it's quite shocking ,you can sort of tell where voter fraud is happening, where they ban id, you know, like why would you ban, ID like in New York and California, it's like illegal to show idea at an election. Well, why would, I can't imagine why that would be the case…. So, two really important things is to ensure judicial integrity on Tuesday and then the voter ID thing It's April Fool's Day. So I think most people aren't aware, like I said, most people aren't aware that there is this important election, but there most people don't even know that there's an election at all. Or if they do, they aren't sure exactly when and where it is. — They don't realize just how important it is. They think it, it's, well it's just, you know, some kind of judicial thing that's not that important. But it actually, what they're doing, what's happening on Tuesday is a vote for the, the which party controls the U.S house of House of Representatives. That is why it is so, so significant and whichever party controls the house, to a significant degree controls the country, which then steers the course of Western civilization. So it's like, I feel like this is one of those things that, that may not seem that it's gonna affect the entire destiny of humanity, — it's a super, it's a super big deal. The fact that I'm here in person, like I'm not phoning it in. I'm here in person”

EVERYONE needs to be aware how SIGNIFICANT the Wisconsin Supreme Court election is This election decides who controls The House of Representatives and Voter ID Elon Musk “The single biggest challenge, I think is actually just making people aware that there is this very important election. There's both the very important election for Judge Schimel as well as the deciding on, on adding voter ID to the Wisconsin Constitution institution, which is very, very important. So it's quite shocking ,you can sort of tell where voter fraud is happening, where they ban id, you know, like why would you ban, ID like in New York and California, it's like illegal to show idea at an election. Well, why would, I can't imagine why that would be the case…. So, two really important things is to ensure judicial integrity on Tuesday and then the voter ID thing It's April Fool's Day. So I think most people aren't aware, like I said, most people aren't aware that there is this important election, but there most people don't even know that there's an election at all. Or if they do, they aren't sure exactly when and where it is. — They don't realize just how important it is. They think it, it's, well it's just, you know, some kind of judicial thing that's not that important. But it actually, what they're doing, what's happening on Tuesday is a vote for the, the which party controls the U.S house of House of Representatives. That is why it is so, so significant and whichever party controls the house, to a significant degree controls the country, which then steers the course of Western civilization. So it's like, I feel like this is one of those things that, that may not seem that it's gonna affect the entire destiny of humanity, — it's a super, it's a super big deal. The fact that I'm here in person, like I'm not phoning it in. I'm here in person”

Wall Street Apes

51,269 次观看 • 1 年前

Jensen talked about this at GTC Taipei: "A lot of people said ‘You know Jensen, AI is coming therefore all of the software companies are going out of business.’ It is exactly the opposite because there are so many agents. The world is longer limited by the number of people and those agents will use more [software] tools than ever before. This is actually an incredible time to be a software company.”

Jensen talked about this at GTC Taipei: "A lot of people said ‘You know Jensen, AI is coming therefore all of the software companies are going out of business.’ It is exactly the opposite because there are so many agents. The world is longer limited by the number of people and those agents will use more [software] tools than ever before. This is actually an incredible time to be a software company.”

Trung Phan

31,139 次观看 • 1 个月前

ELON: I ENSURE GREAT ENGINEERS CAN FLOURISH AT MY COMPANIES “I consider one of my core responsibilities in running companies to have an environment where great engineers can flourish. And I think in a lot of companies, maybe most companies, if somebody is a really talented, driven engineer, their talents are suppressed. At some of the companies, engineering talent is suppressed in a way that is maybe not obviously bad, but where it's just so comfortable, and you're paid so much money, but the output you actually have to produce is so low that it's like a honey trap. They don't necessarily seem like bad places for engineers, but you have to say, a good engineer went in and what did they get out? The output of that engineering talent seems very low. Tesla is not a honey trap. We're demanding. You're going to get a lot of shit done. And it's going to be really cool, and it's not going to be easy. But if you are a super-talented engineer, your talents will be used, I think, to a greater degree than anywhere else. SpaceX is also that way.” Source: Tesla AI Day, September 2022

ELON: I ENSURE GREAT ENGINEERS CAN FLOURISH AT MY COMPANIES “I consider one of my core responsibilities in running companies to have an environment where great engineers can flourish. And I think in a lot of companies, maybe most companies, if somebody is a really talented, driven engineer, their talents are suppressed. At some of the companies, engineering talent is suppressed in a way that is maybe not obviously bad, but where it's just so comfortable, and you're paid so much money, but the output you actually have to produce is so low that it's like a honey trap. They don't necessarily seem like bad places for engineers, but you have to say, a good engineer went in and what did they get out? The output of that engineering talent seems very low. Tesla is not a honey trap. We're demanding. You're going to get a lot of shit done. And it's going to be really cool, and it's not going to be easy. But if you are a super-talented engineer, your talents will be used, I think, to a greater degree than anywhere else. SpaceX is also that way.” Source: Tesla AI Day, September 2022

Mario Nawfal

20,354,554 次观看 • 1 年前

$Elon Musk explains the trillion dollar opportunity in AI “As soon as you unlock digital human, you basically have access to trillions of dollars in revenue” “The most valuable companies currently by market cap, their output is digital. So if you have a human emulator you can basically create one of the most valuable companies in the world overnight” “Take something as simple as customer service. If you have to integrate with the APIs of existing corporations, many of which don’t even have an API, so you’ve got to make one, that’s extremely slow” “However if AI can simply take whatever is given to the outsourced customer service company that they already use, you can make tremendous headway in customer service, which I think is like 1% of the world’s economy and there’s no barriers to entry. You can just immediately say, we’ll outsource it for a fraction of the cost and there’s no integration needed”$

Elon Musk explains the trillion dollar opportunity in AI “As soon as you unlock digital human, you basically have access to trillions of dollars in revenue” “The most valuable companies currently by market cap, their output is digital. So if you have a human emulator you can basically create one of the most valuable companies in the world overnight” “Take something as simple as customer service. If you have to integrate with the APIs of existing corporations, many of which don’t even have an API, so you’ve got to make one, that’s extremely slow” “However if AI can simply take whatever is given to the outsourced customer service company that they already use, you can make tremendous headway in customer service, which I think is like 1% of the world’s economy and there’s no barriers to entry. You can just immediately say, we’ll outsource it for a fraction of the cost and there’s no integration needed”

Jack

92,920 次观看 • 4 个月前

California Assemblymen David Tangipa EXPOSES Gavin Newsom and California Democrats are making them vote on redistricting WITHOUT SEEING IT “This is the most undemocratic process you could possibly imagine. We are voting on a law where none of us has seen the new amendment — This is wrong. This is wrong. This is wrong” “They just changed the law that we are supposed to vote on for the election 10 minutes ago. They are asking all of us here in the legislative body to vote on that and we haven't even seen the language that they changed. “This is the most undemocratic process you could possibly imagine. We are voting on a law where none of us has seen the new amendment. It is a new law now. They have changed it entirely, and now they are forcing it on us and on the floor. People need to see this. This is wrong. This is wrong. This is wrong. 40 million Californians deserve more than 10 minutes of deliberation, especially when your elected leaders haven't even seen it. Please share. Tell everybody. What is going on in Sacramento is the most undemocratic process you could possibly imagine.”

California Assemblymen David Tangipa EXPOSES Gavin Newsom and California Democrats are making them vote on redistricting WITHOUT SEEING IT “This is the most undemocratic process you could possibly imagine. We are voting on a law where none of us has seen the new amendment — This is wrong. This is wrong. This is wrong” “They just changed the law that we are supposed to vote on for the election 10 minutes ago. They are asking all of us here in the legislative body to vote on that and we haven't even seen the language that they changed. “This is the most undemocratic process you could possibly imagine. We are voting on a law where none of us has seen the new amendment. It is a new law now. They have changed it entirely, and now they are forcing it on us and on the floor. People need to see this. This is wrong. This is wrong. This is wrong. 40 million Californians deserve more than 10 minutes of deliberation, especially when your elected leaders haven't even seen it. Please share. Tell everybody. What is going on in Sacramento is the most undemocratic process you could possibly imagine.”

Wall Street Apes

137,114 次观看 • 10 个月前