The MOST Controversial Non-Lethal Device!

lol and what happens when someone accidentally double taps the trigger because they were startled?

If a situation is to the point I have to use a firearm I’m not using non lethal methods.

I am not a lawyer. This is not legal advice. This is merely my take on why I’d never use this device—and why I’d sue anyone who used it on me. Using a firearm on a threat is lethal self defense. If you disable the lethality and use it anyway, clearly you did not believe that you faced a deadly threat, therefore the use of a firearm would not be lawful. If anyone used one of these devices on me, I’d sue and argue that, since the shooter disabled the lethality of the firearm, he did no reasonably believe that he was in mortal danger and, therefore, had no lawful reason to use a deadly weapon on me. I would argue that this was a case of assault with a deadly weapon. This idiocy ranks right up there with firing warning shots or shooting at the legs to wound. Do NOT deploy a firearm unless you reasonably perceive a deadly threat. If you fire, you shoot to STOP. That shot is identical in appearance to a shot to kill. Only your intent is to STOP the threat, and you would rather he stopped without dying. You still shoot center mass, knowing that that has the greatest chance of stopping the threat—and is likely to cause death. If the perp dies, it is HIS fault, not the fault of the citizen defending himself.

What's even the point of making pistol rounds non or less lethal? Firearms are by their nature, lethal by design and function. Besides, it's only lethal when a person dies.

If I’m going “less” lethal I’d just go for a few pelvic shots and watch him bleed 🤣

Why would you pull out a gun if you don't need a lethal response?

It’s retarded

Less lethal 🤣 must be for liberals

So, in a home defense situation, I shoot someone with this aluminum ball and they don't die or get really hurt? And then I have to shoot them more times? Is this a trick by 'Big Ammo' to make me waste ammo?

As a law enforcement officer of 48 years and a firearms instructor of over 30 this is the stupidest thing I’ve ever seen.

I can't think of a single situation where I'd pull a trigger and not want the bullet to find its target as fast as possible.

This is just asking for prison time

I don't like it. You either have a right to defend yourself with deadly force, or you do not.

Shoot someone in the ass with it now gotta see results

What is controversial about it? It is literally retarded and if you use this you deserve to go to jail or be sued into oblivion.

We have a slingshot at home.

Good for one shot only apparently because it flies off the gun. And BTW, how do you get the spent round out of that ball? I'm sure it's packed in there pretty tightly.

I have something like that! Only it doesn’t slip on the barrel and the fucker that breaks into my house doesn’t get back up ,,,, ever!

Just throw rocks 🪨

Nonsense. If your life is threatened. Shoot to eliminate the threat.

Flagging the cameraman like grazy...

What if you attach this thing and then it falls off? And you don't realize it, and you pull the trigger on someone that you are not legally justified to kill?And then they die.

Id rather just shoot a thief dead.

And now the criminal gets a second chance. No thanks

Non lethals ass

Give the perp a chance to return fire... not smart. First shot should always be with lethal intention. If not, you're an idiot.

There's stupid, and there's this which is next-level stupid.

How is that not staying in my holster when I draw?

My John Deer said it’s not a good idea! Someone breaking into house doesn’t need a bruise, they need a dirt nap!

A solution to a problem that doesn't exist...

That's one of the stupidest things I've ever seen.

Make that a pointed cone shape. Why would you make something meant to be lethal, less lethal? i want it more lethal

That’s gotta hurt so fuckin bad