Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

The most dangerous people don't react, they prepare. Reality check: Patience isn't weakness. Sometimes the best revenge is waiting until your opponent never sees it coming. 🎬 Breaking Bad. Season 4, Episode 10 (Salud) 📺 Credit: AMC / Sony Pictures Television. What's more powerful, patience or revenge?

68,656 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨FBI PERJURY🚨 The FBI called for REVENGE on a #J6 subject prior to arrest, covered it up, and lied about it at trial. FBI ASAC Joel Feaster held an all-employee meeting prior to the arrest and calmly declared, “They threatened our people, and that's unacceptable. So, they're going to feel… they're going to feel our revenge, okay. They don't do this shit to us.” This is the audio of his call for revenge and his trial testimony transcript. The FBI and US Attorney’s Office never disclosed this misconduct and bias to the defense as required by their discovery obligations. I reported this misconduct to FBI, DOJ-OIG, and the Court PRIOR to the trial. It was ignored and suppressed. At trial, the defense called FBI ASAC Feaster and asked if he made the “revenge” remark. Feaster lied and said ‘No’. I then reported the perjury with a full 14-page transcript of Feaster’s meeting with his call for revenge and other misconduct. The FBI, OIG, USAO, and the court again ignored it. What’s worse is that the SAC (Feaster’s boss) heard the revenge. At least 100 people heard the call for revenge and a handful complained about it. FBI personnel in the courtroom who heard the revenge comment and heard the perjury sat silent and did nothing. This is your FBI – morally bankrupt. The AUSAs were aware of the revenge allegation yet didn’t bother to interview me or anyone to corroborate Feaster’s remark. Those same AUSAs sat in the court while Feaster perjured himself and said and done nothing 9 months later. Please RT to bring pressure and demand accountability of #DOJ and #FBI. Attorney General Pamela Bondi Senate Republicans #Whistleblowers *Apologies for repost. Most didn't realize the audio evidence was attached.

William Taylor

19,637 просмотров • 1 год назад

.Rob Miles is spitting fire: “People are starting from a prior in which ‘[AIs] are safe until you give me an airtight case for why they're dangerous.’ This framing is exhausting. You explain one of the 10,000 ways that AIs could be dangerous, then they explain why they don't think that specific thing would happen. Then you have to change tack, and then they say, 'your story keeps changing'... "If you're building an AGI, it's like building a Saturn V rocket [but with every human on it]. It's a complex, difficult engineering task, and you're going to try and make it aligned, which means it's going to deliver people to the moon and home again. People ask “why assume they won't just land on the Moon and return home safely?" And I'm like, because you don't know what you're doing! If you try to send people to the moon and you don't know what you're doing, your astronauts will die. [Unlike the telephone, or electricity, where you can assume it’s probably going to work out okay] I contend that ASI is more like the moon rocket. "The moon is small compared with the rest of the sky, so you don't get to the moon by default - you hit some part of the sky that isn't the moon. So, show me the plan by which you predict to specifically hit the moon." And then people say, “how do you predict that [AIs] will want bad things?” There's more bad things than good things! It's not actually a complicated argument... I'm not going to predict specifically where it off into random space your astronauts are going, but you're not going to hit the moon unless you have a really good, technically clear plan for how you do it. And if you ask these people for their plan, they don't have one. What's Yann Lecun’s plan?” "I think that if you're building an enormously powerful technology and you have a lot of uncertainty about what's going to happen, this is bad. Like, this is default unsafe. If you've got something that's going to do enormously influential things in the world, and you don't know what enormously influential things it's going to do, this thing is unsafe until you can convince me that it's safe." HOST: “That’s a good way of thinking about it - with some technologies you can assume that the default will be good or at least neutral, or that the capacity of a person to use this in a very bad way is bounded somehow. There's just only so many people you could electrocute one by one."

AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️

77,378 просмотров • 3 лет назад