正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

The most valuable decisions give you zero feedback tobi lutke explains ... "Intuition is actually the most valuable when there isn't direct feedback." Wait, what? "If there's many choices, like there's five things that look like good paths to go forward, and any of them has rapid feedback, everyone...

shaneparrish's profile picture

Shane Parrish

566,215 subscribers

31,475 次观看 • 2 天前 •via X (Twitter)

教育
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 条评论

Gianthologist 的头像
Gianthologist2 天前

@tobi Zero-feedback decisions force a longer time horizon. Without the quick confirmation, the quality of the process matters more than how it feels afterward.

Dan Foster 的头像
Dan Foster2 天前

@tobi Which is also why they're the easiest to fool yourself about, since you never find out whether it was intuition or just preference.

Doca Gomes 的头像
Doca Gomes2 天前

@tobi I love tobi too much. Genius.

John A.T. Nguyen 的头像
John A.T. Nguyen2 天前

@tobi The most valuable decisions give you high signal, of which zero feedback can be one form of that... then it's discernment that enables intuition to parse through that signal to determine if it's indeed valuable or just noise - proper actions can finally follow afterwards 💡

Peter Rex 的头像
Peter Rex2 天前

@tobi similar to underwriting deals, get the key assumptions right in your head first. If that doesnt hold up the rest of the analysis doesnt matter

Thomas Corbelli 的头像
Thomas Corbelli2 天前

@tobi Refusals leave no record, and they are the actual shape of a life. In my work the best result is a logbook entry that says nothing happened. No one ever writes back. For most of my twenties that was quietly unbearable.

Brandon Keyyy 的头像
Brandon Keyyy2 天前

@tobi Seen this exact pattern in markets. Trades everyone can validate in real time are rarely the ones that pay. No feedback usually means no competition. Meanwhile the ticker gives you feedback every second. How's that working out for most traders?

Hamza Javed 的头像
Hamza Javed2 天前

@tobi Fast feedback is addictive, which is why inboxes win and the quiet compounding work loses. The fix is structural: protect the no-feedback work with a blocked hour before the day's dopamine starts.

Ricardo Dias 的头像
Ricardo Dias2 天前

@tobi absence of rapid feedback is informative only if the bet still has a causal thesis and leading indicators you can inspect. otherwise, “long-term” can become a convenient name for a decision that was never specified well enough to learn from.

Rob 的头像
Rob2 天前

@tobi An interesting perspective. But I also feel that means a bit into confirmation bias?

Maya 的头像
Maya2 天前

@tobi Same in trading. You make the call, the market shrugs, and you move on.

相关视频

A lot of times, our intention in trying to correct someone may be to help them, but the way we do it could be insensitive and hurtful. Before we give corrective feedback to someone, let’s ask ourselves these 4 questions and go ahead only if the answers to all of these are yes. Ask yourself: * Am I the right person to give corrective feedback? * Do I have the right intention to give corrective feedback? * Do I know the right way (sensitive to the feelings of others) to give corrective feedback? * Is it the right time, or do I need to wait until later? Let’s make sure that our actions/expression are also in alignment with our good intentions. #intention #action #expression #alignment #Feedback #correction #Sensitivecommunication #BeKind #BeKindAlways #SaturdayMorning #SaturdayMotivation #MotivationalQuotes #InspirationalQuotes #EnergizeYourMind #lifesamazingsecrets #thewayofthemonk #monkify #monkifyapp #monkifyyourlife #gaurgopaldas #GaurGopalDas
0:47

A lot of times, our intention in trying to correct someone may be to help them, but the way we do it could be insensitive and hurtful. Before we give corrective feedback to someone, let’s ask ourselves these 4 questions and go ahead only if the answers to all of these are yes. Ask yourself: * Am I the right person to give corrective feedback? * Do I have the right intention to give corrective feedback? * Do I know the right way (sensitive to the feelings of others) to give corrective feedback? * Is it the right time, or do I need to wait until later? Let’s make sure that our actions/expression are also in alignment with our good intentions. #intention #action #expression #alignment #Feedback #correction #Sensitivecommunication #BeKind #BeKindAlways #SaturdayMorning #SaturdayMotivation #MotivationalQuotes #InspirationalQuotes #EnergizeYourMind #lifesamazingsecrets #thewayofthemonk #monkify #monkifyapp #monkifyyourlife #gaurgopaldas #GaurGopalDas

Gaur Gopal Das

113,909 次观看 • 2 年前

Elon Musk: You really need to coax negative feedback. “It's very important to actively seek out and listen very carefully to negative feedback. This is something that people tend to avoid because it's painful. When friends get a product, I say, don't tell me what you like, tell me what you don't like. Because otherwise, your friend is not going to tell you what he doesn't like. He's going to say, oh, I love this and that, and then leave out the this-is-the-stuff-I-don't-like list, because he wants to be your friend, he doesn't want to offend you. So, you really need to coax negative feedback. You know that if somebody is your friend, or at least not your enemy, and they're giving you negative feedback, they may be wrong, but it's coming from a good place. And sometimes, even your enemies give you good negative feedback.” Interview with Kevin Rose, September 8, 2012
0:52

Elon Musk: You really need to coax negative feedback. “It's very important to actively seek out and listen very carefully to negative feedback. This is something that people tend to avoid because it's painful. When friends get a product, I say, don't tell me what you like, tell me what you don't like. Because otherwise, your friend is not going to tell you what he doesn't like. He's going to say, oh, I love this and that, and then leave out the this-is-the-stuff-I-don't-like list, because he wants to be your friend, he doesn't want to offend you. So, you really need to coax negative feedback. You know that if somebody is your friend, or at least not your enemy, and they're giving you negative feedback, they may be wrong, but it's coming from a good place. And sometimes, even your enemies give you good negative feedback.” Interview with Kevin Rose, September 8, 2012

ELON CLIPS

19,315,746 次观看 • 1 年前

Wuthering Waves Producer on Handling Game Feedback: Interview with Nvliu66 ​For any game, there will always be both praise and criticism, positive voices and negative ones. Do you spend a lot of time monitoring these discussions online? ​Whether player feedback is good or bad, the most critical factor is our mindset as developers. When we choose to look at feedback, we must be very clear about our purpose. Our goal must be to extract insights that help us make the game better; that is where the real value lies. ​It’s not about seeking "emotional validation." To be honest, I truly feel that looking for validation doesn't provide much value. ​So, when you decide to dive into the feedback, you need to have a specific mindset: you must be determined to find the factors or "clues" that can help the product improve. ​Game development is a user-facing industry. Dealing with feedback is something you have to face, practice, and get better at. If you let yourself be swayed or discouraged by a random, emotionally charged comment, that, in my opinion, is a sign of being unprofessional. #WutheringWaves #WuWa
0:56

Wuthering Waves Producer on Handling Game Feedback: Interview with Nvliu66 ​For any game, there will always be both praise and criticism, positive voices and negative ones. Do you spend a lot of time monitoring these discussions online? ​Whether player feedback is good or bad, the most critical factor is our mindset as developers. When we choose to look at feedback, we must be very clear about our purpose. Our goal must be to extract insights that help us make the game better; that is where the real value lies. ​It’s not about seeking "emotional validation." To be honest, I truly feel that looking for validation doesn't provide much value. ​So, when you decide to dive into the feedback, you need to have a specific mindset: you must be determined to find the factors or "clues" that can help the product improve. ​Game development is a user-facing industry. Dealing with feedback is something you have to face, practice, and get better at. If you let yourself be swayed or discouraged by a random, emotionally charged comment, that, in my opinion, is a sign of being unprofessional. #WutheringWaves #WuWa

Naru

30,378 次观看 • 7 个月前

This is absolutely the MOST IMPORTANT thing said today during the meeting with Elon Musk and Donald Trump Listen to EVERY WORD: Elon Musk “If there's not a good feedback loop from the people to the government. And if you have rule of the bureaucrat or if the bureaucracy is in charge, then what meaning does democracy actually have? If the people cannot vote and have their will be decided by their elected representatives in the form of the president and the Senate and the house, then we don't live in a democracy. We live in a bureaucracy. So it's incredibly important that we close that feedback loop. We fix that feedback loop and that the public, the public's elected representatives, the president, the house and the Senate decide what happens as opposed to an a large unelected bureaucracy.” “You can't have an autonomous federal bureaucracy. You have to have one that is responsive to the people. That's the whole point of a democracy.” “If you asked, looked at the founders today and said, what do you think of the way things have turned out? Well… what we have this unelected, fourth unconstitutional branch of, of government, which is the bureaucracy, which has in a lot of ways currently more power than any elected representative.” Completely logical. We need huge reform.
1:17

This is absolutely the MOST IMPORTANT thing said today during the meeting with Elon Musk and Donald Trump Listen to EVERY WORD: Elon Musk “If there's not a good feedback loop from the people to the government. And if you have rule of the bureaucrat or if the bureaucracy is in charge, then what meaning does democracy actually have? If the people cannot vote and have their will be decided by their elected representatives in the form of the president and the Senate and the house, then we don't live in a democracy. We live in a bureaucracy. So it's incredibly important that we close that feedback loop. We fix that feedback loop and that the public, the public's elected representatives, the president, the house and the Senate decide what happens as opposed to an a large unelected bureaucracy.” “You can't have an autonomous federal bureaucracy. You have to have one that is responsive to the people. That's the whole point of a democracy.” “If you asked, looked at the founders today and said, what do you think of the way things have turned out? Well… what we have this unelected, fourth unconstitutional branch of, of government, which is the bureaucracy, which has in a lot of ways currently more power than any elected representative.” Completely logical. We need huge reform.

Wall Street Apes

12,324,805 次观看 • 1 年前

Cathie Wood says ARK underwrites every name to a market multiple of 18-19x EBITDA in year five, and is stricter on valuation than most with a longer horizon "And our working assumption is that premium multiple is going to decay. It's going to compress during the next five years toward a market multiple." "And in fact, most of our analysis, the market's multiple has gone up. Most of our analysis is at 18, 19x EBITDA in the fifth year, even if we don't believe it's going to get there. We want to be conservative." "So our analysts and portfolio managers have to believe that the revenue growth and margin expansion these companies are going to enjoy over the next five years is going to overwhelm that compression in multiples." "So many people think, you know, we'll buy any technology company, no matter what. We probably are stricter in terms of valuation, but have a longer-term time horizon than most."
0:56

Cathie Wood says ARK underwrites every name to a market multiple of 18-19x EBITDA in year five, and is stricter on valuation than most with a longer horizon "And our working assumption is that premium multiple is going to decay. It's going to compress during the next five years toward a market multiple." "And in fact, most of our analysis, the market's multiple has gone up. Most of our analysis is at 18, 19x EBITDA in the fifth year, even if we don't believe it's going to get there. We want to be conservative." "So our analysts and portfolio managers have to believe that the revenue growth and margin expansion these companies are going to enjoy over the next five years is going to overwhelm that compression in multiples." "So many people think, you know, we'll buy any technology company, no matter what. We probably are stricter in terms of valuation, but have a longer-term time horizon than most."

Fireside Alpha

22,498 次观看 • 1 个月前

March ‘25 | UATX | AbCellera CEO Carl Hansen discusses the stock falling from $70 to $2 and drops one of the most impactful statements I’ve come across: “What other people are telling you is valuable is not what you should pay attention to…. You really need to look inward and ask yourself ‘What are the the real examples, the pieces of data, the things that I can see and touch and feel that tell me I’m on the right track so that I have feedback’ because if you listen to others, not just on public markets but in your life, if you listen to others, you will be blown off course”.
4:07

March ‘25 | UATX | AbCellera CEO Carl Hansen discusses the stock falling from $70 to $2 and drops one of the most impactful statements I’ve come across: “What other people are telling you is valuable is not what you should pay attention to…. You really need to look inward and ask yourself ‘What are the the real examples, the pieces of data, the things that I can see and touch and feel that tell me I’m on the right track so that I have feedback’ because if you listen to others, not just on public markets but in your life, if you listen to others, you will be blown off course”.

Jack Prescott

34,461 次观看 • 8 个月前

Chamath and Larry Summers Debate the Market Reaction to Trump's Tariffs Lawrence H. Summers: "If this is such a terrific thing, why do markets think it's so terrible for the American economy?" "Maybe the market's just completely wrong ... but the job of markets is to look forward." "It's to look passed the immediate." "It's to see what the long run consequences are going to be." "And markets are making a pretty devastatingly negative judgment on this step." Chamath Palihapitiya: " Larry, that's not true." " So let's just establish a couple facts about 'the markets.'" "Number one, there are two markets and they behave totally differently, and sometimes inversely to each other." "There's the stock market and there's the bond market." 1) Stocks: mean reversion "With respect to the stock market, what they are debating, and you're right Larry, is what is the effective long-term rate of return a dollar needs to generate in order to pay me back that dollar?" "That is what the fundamental stock market does." "And what we've seen for many years with trade imbalances, trade deficits, and close-to-zero interest rates, of which more of that happened under Democrats than Republicans, we have allowed the stock market to inflate past historical averages." " What we've actually seen happen in the last week is what most people would call mean reversion." "The stock market is still way above where it was last year, two years ago, three years ago." "What has happened is that the forward multiples have compressed. So that's number one. That's a fact." 2) Bonds: it's possible a major trade blew up "And then with respect to bonds, what we are seeing now is there are two very complicated issues." "In the last two days, we saw one part of the bond market totally get out of whack." "And what we know is that the yields changed materially in a very acute way, which is atypical of how the bond market typically digests a philosophical change in approach to policy." " What we heard in the last 24 hours is a lot of this move may have been attributed to an enormous levered bet on US treasuries by a Japanese hedge fund." " It will take three, and four, and five, and six weeks for us to really know." 3) Private credit: something to watch closely " Separately, what we do know, though, where the structural complexity of the market — and this is where, Larry, I agree with you — is acute and important to observe is in the credit markets for private companies." "And that is where you have to pay a lot of attention."
2:18

Chamath and Larry Summers Debate the Market Reaction to Trump's Tariffs Lawrence H. Summers: "If this is such a terrific thing, why do markets think it's so terrible for the American economy?" "Maybe the market's just completely wrong ... but the job of markets is to look forward." "It's to look passed the immediate." "It's to see what the long run consequences are going to be." "And markets are making a pretty devastatingly negative judgment on this step." Chamath Palihapitiya: " Larry, that's not true." " So let's just establish a couple facts about 'the markets.'" "Number one, there are two markets and they behave totally differently, and sometimes inversely to each other." "There's the stock market and there's the bond market." 1) Stocks: mean reversion "With respect to the stock market, what they are debating, and you're right Larry, is what is the effective long-term rate of return a dollar needs to generate in order to pay me back that dollar?" "That is what the fundamental stock market does." "And what we've seen for many years with trade imbalances, trade deficits, and close-to-zero interest rates, of which more of that happened under Democrats than Republicans, we have allowed the stock market to inflate past historical averages." " What we've actually seen happen in the last week is what most people would call mean reversion." "The stock market is still way above where it was last year, two years ago, three years ago." "What has happened is that the forward multiples have compressed. So that's number one. That's a fact." 2) Bonds: it's possible a major trade blew up "And then with respect to bonds, what we are seeing now is there are two very complicated issues." "In the last two days, we saw one part of the bond market totally get out of whack." "And what we know is that the yields changed materially in a very acute way, which is atypical of how the bond market typically digests a philosophical change in approach to policy." " What we heard in the last 24 hours is a lot of this move may have been attributed to an enormous levered bet on US treasuries by a Japanese hedge fund." " It will take three, and four, and five, and six weeks for us to really know." 3) Private credit: something to watch closely " Separately, what we do know, though, where the structural complexity of the market — and this is where, Larry, I agree with you — is acute and important to observe is in the credit markets for private companies." "And that is where you have to pay a lot of attention."

The All-In Podcast

98,290 次观看 • 1 年前

Trump: The people that we have in this military. You can send most of them to Hollywood and they could become like movie stars. We actually have strong people going into the military now as opposed to people that aren't strong or that shouldn't be there, and I call it Central Casting
1:15

Trump: The people that we have in this military. You can send most of them to Hollywood and they could become like movie stars. We actually have strong people going into the military now as opposed to people that aren't strong or that shouldn't be there, and I call it Central Casting

Acyn

40,978 次观看 • 2 个月前

Creative workshops can be destructive because you get too much feedback. It's all over the place. The people giving you advice don't actually know you. Ocean Vuong says that in his workshops, people aren't allowed to critique other writers for the first few weeks. He says: "When you suspend critique, people are more willing to let the novelty of themselves come into the room. So we just put things in the center. When we look at a poem or short story, we simply talk about what we notice. And then once we know each other's tendencies, we can gear our feedback towards others." The importance of knowing someone before we give them feedback is obvious in other parts of life. For example, you would never walk up to a stranger on the street and instantly give them fashion advice. But that's exactly what we do in creative workshops.
1:40

Creative workshops can be destructive because you get too much feedback. It's all over the place. The people giving you advice don't actually know you. Ocean Vuong says that in his workshops, people aren't allowed to critique other writers for the first few weeks. He says: "When you suspend critique, people are more willing to let the novelty of themselves come into the room. So we just put things in the center. When we look at a poem or short story, we simply talk about what we notice. And then once we know each other's tendencies, we can gear our feedback towards others." The importance of knowing someone before we give them feedback is obvious in other parts of life. For example, you would never walk up to a stranger on the street and instantly give them fashion advice. But that's exactly what we do in creative workshops.

David Perell Clips

78,544 次观看 • 5 个月前

Asmongold gave feedback to Twitch expressing his concerns with the distracted driving problem "I actually complained privately..they're like well do you have any feedback?..I said you guys have to cut down and like stop the distracted driving sh*t..I feel like there's no gray area..just do not f'in drive and stream period" "There are a handful..but it actually should be a default that you can't do it..and only people that are doing it are people that do it professionally, like Swifty" "Eventually somebody's going to get K-ed..it's gonna be totally on Twitch..bc everybody told them to cut this sh*t out..and Twitch didn't want to listen"
4:08

Asmongold gave feedback to Twitch expressing his concerns with the distracted driving problem "I actually complained privately..they're like well do you have any feedback?..I said you guys have to cut down and like stop the distracted driving sh*t..I feel like there's no gray area..just do not f'in drive and stream period" "There are a handful..but it actually should be a default that you can't do it..and only people that are doing it are people that do it professionally, like Swifty" "Eventually somebody's going to get K-ed..it's gonna be totally on Twitch..bc everybody told them to cut this sh*t out..and Twitch didn't want to listen"

yeet

25,271 次观看 • 11 天前

In what order will AI solve the three big problems in drug development? Ben Liu, co-founder of Formation Bio: "There are actually three consequential predictions: drug design and discovery, tox prediction, and clinical efficacy. We believe they will all one day happen, but the winners will be disproportionately right about the order." "The framework is: where are the benchmarks the cleanest, the data variability the lowest, and the feedback loops the shortest." "Drug discovery gets solved first... we know what a drug binding another drug looks like. The feedback loops are in minutes or days. Historically very low variability because it's physics, it's chemistry." "Tox is a little more complicated, but I know what a liver tox signal looks like. The rodents used are genetically identical. And tox studies are weeks, not years." "Clinical efficacy is gonna take the longest, the feedback loops are the longest, the data is the most highly variable, and you actually don't have really clean benchmarks for most diseases of what getting better looks like."
3:35

In what order will AI solve the three big problems in drug development? Ben Liu, co-founder of Formation Bio: "There are actually three consequential predictions: drug design and discovery, tox prediction, and clinical efficacy. We believe they will all one day happen, but the winners will be disproportionately right about the order." "The framework is: where are the benchmarks the cleanest, the data variability the lowest, and the feedback loops the shortest." "Drug discovery gets solved first... we know what a drug binding another drug looks like. The feedback loops are in minutes or days. Historically very low variability because it's physics, it's chemistry." "Tox is a little more complicated, but I know what a liver tox signal looks like. The rodents used are genetically identical. And tox studies are weeks, not years." "Clinical efficacy is gonna take the longest, the feedback loops are the longest, the data is the most highly variable, and you actually don't have really clean benchmarks for most diseases of what getting better looks like."

MTS

17,344 次观看 • 3 个月前

Marc Andreessen explains the 3 Necessities for Start-up Success: "The general criteria for a successful high-tech startup, in my view, you see different sort of rules of thumb from different people. But the three big things you always come back to are, is there a big market? And by the way, that comes in two parts. Is there a big existing market that you think you can go after and sort of displace incumbents or do you believe there will be a new market that will be big? So big market. Is there a fundamental technology or economic change that causes you to basically justify having a new company? And that's really important. And the way I always think about that is, is there a 10X change happening in the technology landscape? Is something 10X faster or 10X cheaper or 10X better? And if it's not 10X, we as both VCs and entrepreneurs, we really have to ask ourselves like, is it really worth doing? Because it's really hard. I mean, it's really hard to start new companies. new companies generally shouldn't exist. Existing companies are usually pretty good at what they do. And so for a new company to exist, it not only has to like come in and go into business and bring a product to market, but it has to bring a product to market that's so much better than what already exists that it punches through the sort of status quo. And most customers in most markets are pretty happy buying from the current suppliers and so there has to be a real kind of edge on the thing and we look for that in either a technology change, usually a technology change or an economic change. which are often the same thing. And then the third is team. Is the team outstanding? And if you think about this as an entrepreneur, it becomes a question of the founding team. Some companies are solo founders and they can work, but generally most of us, like myself, we're human beings, we're mortal. You want to have a founding team of complementary skill sets. And so you want to have at least one super strong technologist, quite possibly more than one. Some of the best startups are actually more than one founding technologist and then it often helps to have somebody who's like a product or who's a market or sales person or has a sort of really good understanding of business on the team, certainly helps a lot. And so we sort of look at market, product, and team. And the reality is you need all three. I would say, interestingly, if you're going to compromise as an investor, if we're going to compromise on one of those, it would actually be the product. And the reason I say that is because a great market is a lot easier to make up for with iterative product execution than a poor market. Because the problem with a poor market, a small market, is even if you do a great job on the product, there just aren't that many customers. It's hard to ever get big."
2:15

Marc Andreessen explains the 3 Necessities for Start-up Success: "The general criteria for a successful high-tech startup, in my view, you see different sort of rules of thumb from different people. But the three big things you always come back to are, is there a big market? And by the way, that comes in two parts. Is there a big existing market that you think you can go after and sort of displace incumbents or do you believe there will be a new market that will be big? So big market. Is there a fundamental technology or economic change that causes you to basically justify having a new company? And that's really important. And the way I always think about that is, is there a 10X change happening in the technology landscape? Is something 10X faster or 10X cheaper or 10X better? And if it's not 10X, we as both VCs and entrepreneurs, we really have to ask ourselves like, is it really worth doing? Because it's really hard. I mean, it's really hard to start new companies. new companies generally shouldn't exist. Existing companies are usually pretty good at what they do. And so for a new company to exist, it not only has to like come in and go into business and bring a product to market, but it has to bring a product to market that's so much better than what already exists that it punches through the sort of status quo. And most customers in most markets are pretty happy buying from the current suppliers and so there has to be a real kind of edge on the thing and we look for that in either a technology change, usually a technology change or an economic change. which are often the same thing. And then the third is team. Is the team outstanding? And if you think about this as an entrepreneur, it becomes a question of the founding team. Some companies are solo founders and they can work, but generally most of us, like myself, we're human beings, we're mortal. You want to have a founding team of complementary skill sets. And so you want to have at least one super strong technologist, quite possibly more than one. Some of the best startups are actually more than one founding technologist and then it often helps to have somebody who's like a product or who's a market or sales person or has a sort of really good understanding of business on the team, certainly helps a lot. And so we sort of look at market, product, and team. And the reality is you need all three. I would say, interestingly, if you're going to compromise as an investor, if we're going to compromise on one of those, it would actually be the product. And the reason I say that is because a great market is a lot easier to make up for with iterative product execution than a poor market. Because the problem with a poor market, a small market, is even if you do a great job on the product, there just aren't that many customers. It's hard to ever get big."

Founder Mode

39,005 次观看 • 8 个月前

Democrats and their mainstream media say Elon Musk has taken over our Government and is doing whatever he wants Does this sound like someone who is power hungry and taking over? Elon Musk “Things I wanna be clear is like, I am looking for feedback. So it's not like I'm just going open loop here and doing whatever I want to do. I kind of wanna know what, what do the people want and what should we do? And, and then do it — as opposed to me just deciding on my own. But we also want to have extreme transparency, so like no shady back room deals or whatever, everything done in open total exposure. Like you can see the mistakes that are made, the good things that are done. You can comment on it, you can, you know, raise concerns. This is, we, we want to transparent, open government feedback, loop engaged. Transparency is key. Let's make decisions together, not in the shadows.“
0:43

Democrats and their mainstream media say Elon Musk has taken over our Government and is doing whatever he wants Does this sound like someone who is power hungry and taking over? Elon Musk “Things I wanna be clear is like, I am looking for feedback. So it's not like I'm just going open loop here and doing whatever I want to do. I kind of wanna know what, what do the people want and what should we do? And, and then do it — as opposed to me just deciding on my own. But we also want to have extreme transparency, so like no shady back room deals or whatever, everything done in open total exposure. Like you can see the mistakes that are made, the good things that are done. You can comment on it, you can, you know, raise concerns. This is, we, we want to transparent, open government feedback, loop engaged. Transparency is key. Let's make decisions together, not in the shadows.“

Wall Street Apes

155,292 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 BREAKING: SecWar Pete Hegseth reveals today is a +20% SURGE in US military strikes on Iran, the most ever in the war, thanks to an intelligence feedback loop "Our intelligence just gets better and better. That feedback loop feeds itself." "And as we refine those targets, it exponentially increases what we can hit and why, to include strategic things the world's talking about and looking at." "I's our job to have a plan for it, which we do, to address it, and ensure that the president has options. We've done that from the beginning in this department. And he'll have options on that topic as well, right here."
0:31

🚨 BREAKING: SecWar Pete Hegseth reveals today is a +20% SURGE in US military strikes on Iran, the most ever in the war, thanks to an intelligence feedback loop "Our intelligence just gets better and better. That feedback loop feeds itself." "And as we refine those targets, it exponentially increases what we can hit and why, to include strategic things the world's talking about and looking at." "I's our job to have a plan for it, which we do, to address it, and ensure that the president has options. We've done that from the beginning in this department. And he'll have options on that topic as well, right here."

Eric Daugherty

31,817 次观看 • 6 个月前

Most teachers in this country are regularly observed as part of their professional development. Two thirds of teachers do not think this has made a difference to their actual practice. Teachers do not understand the feedback they receive. They do not agree with the feedback they receive. They do not feel willing or capable to implement the feedback they receive. These things are facts, and they are both worrying and upsetting. And none of this is a secret. We all know it, we've all experienced it. When we asked Carousel Teaching users what topics they wanted us to make courses on, the most common response was "how to observe lessons and give feedback." Ben Rice and I are now MAD EXCITED to announce our How To Observe a Lesson and Give Feedback course. It's mega. We filmed a bunch of lessons, and we also filmed me observing those lessons. We deconstruct the science of observations, and the art of giving feedback. It's pretty damn innovative, and we're confident it will help teachers and leaders get better at these critical skills. We will also be delivering a FREE webinar where we will look at some of the core strategies, do make sure to come along :) For more on the course: For more on the webinar: To book a demo so we can show you the whole platform:
3:50

Most teachers in this country are regularly observed as part of their professional development. Two thirds of teachers do not think this has made a difference to their actual practice. Teachers do not understand the feedback they receive. They do not agree with the feedback they receive. They do not feel willing or capable to implement the feedback they receive. These things are facts, and they are both worrying and upsetting. And none of this is a secret. We all know it, we've all experienced it. When we asked Carousel Teaching users what topics they wanted us to make courses on, the most common response was "how to observe lessons and give feedback." Ben Rice and I are now MAD EXCITED to announce our How To Observe a Lesson and Give Feedback course. It's mega. We filmed a bunch of lessons, and we also filmed me observing those lessons. We deconstruct the science of observations, and the art of giving feedback. It's pretty damn innovative, and we're confident it will help teachers and leaders get better at these critical skills. We will also be delivering a FREE webinar where we will look at some of the core strategies, do make sure to come along :) For more on the course: For more on the webinar: To book a demo so we can show you the whole platform:

Adam Boxer

52,138 次观看 • 4 个月前

🔥NOW: RFK Jr. tells Dr. Drew how he plans to attack the epidemic of addiction in America: "In the 20-year Vietnam war, we lost 56,000 American kids. So we're losing almost double that every year from this disease. You'd think that the trillion dollars we put into that war and the daily preoccupation on the news, the nightly news coverage for 20 years the presidential elections that were fixated on it, and it's half the number of people that are effected every single year. Our communities are being torn apart. We need to give this the same priority. I'm very reluctant to dictate a government solution. What we found from touring, this is a small fraction of the places we actually visited. I wanted to see every place that's doing this right, and what we found is there's a tremendous diversity of approaches that are working very very well. One thing almost all of them have in common is that they don't have government support. And so I'm very reluctant to get the government involved in a way that is going to micromanage places like this. I want to make the government support them and that may be through land purchases and through those kinds of contracts but I don't want the government to be coming in and micromanaging. I think this has to be run by NGOs and we have to use a lot of different approaches. You know Franklin Roosevelt when he was launching the New Deal said 'We're going to try these programs and we're going try something one thing at a time and if it doesn't work we're going to abandon it and were going to try something else, but were always going to be trying something.' And all I can guarantee, I can't tell you right now that there's one solution or even a multiplicity of solutions but what I can tell you is that in my administration we're going to solve the problem because I'm going to focus on it. And if there are things that are working we're going to create ecosystems in which those kinds of solutions can proliferate.
2:31

🔥NOW: RFK Jr. tells Dr. Drew how he plans to attack the epidemic of addiction in America: "In the 20-year Vietnam war, we lost 56,000 American kids. So we're losing almost double that every year from this disease. You'd think that the trillion dollars we put into that war and the daily preoccupation on the news, the nightly news coverage for 20 years the presidential elections that were fixated on it, and it's half the number of people that are effected every single year. Our communities are being torn apart. We need to give this the same priority. I'm very reluctant to dictate a government solution. What we found from touring, this is a small fraction of the places we actually visited. I wanted to see every place that's doing this right, and what we found is there's a tremendous diversity of approaches that are working very very well. One thing almost all of them have in common is that they don't have government support. And so I'm very reluctant to get the government involved in a way that is going to micromanage places like this. I want to make the government support them and that may be through land purchases and through those kinds of contracts but I don't want the government to be coming in and micromanaging. I think this has to be run by NGOs and we have to use a lot of different approaches. You know Franklin Roosevelt when he was launching the New Deal said 'We're going to try these programs and we're going try something one thing at a time and if it doesn't work we're going to abandon it and were going to try something else, but were always going to be trying something.' And all I can guarantee, I can't tell you right now that there's one solution or even a multiplicity of solutions but what I can tell you is that in my administration we're going to solve the problem because I'm going to focus on it. And if there are things that are working we're going to create ecosystems in which those kinds of solutions can proliferate.

Tayyy

144,488 次观看 • 2 年前