Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

The Musqueam agreement doesn't only affect private property. It subjects public property to veto and joint decision making with unelected band chief and council. The BC NDP doesn't care.

Dallas Brodie

29,863 subscribers

16,278 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Liberals have put the land, property, and homes of all British Columbians at risk by backing down from opposing the Cowichan decision and signing the Musqueam agreement. Here are the 4 steps to protect your home and property:

Liberals have put the land, property, and homes of all British Columbians at risk by backing down from opposing the Cowichan decision and signing the Musqueam agreement. Here are the 4 steps to protect your home and property:

Pierre Poilievre

47,832 views • 4 months ago

Caught a BC NDP supporter vandalizing private property. Not only does he admit to it when I caught him, but he proudly wears a David Eby pin. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but damaging property is totally unacceptable and illegal. Will the NDP denounce this? #bcpoli

Caught a BC NDP supporter vandalizing private property. Not only does he admit to it when I caught him, but he proudly wears a David Eby pin. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but damaging property is totally unacceptable and illegal. Will the NDP denounce this? #bcpoli

Angelo Isidorou

135,152 views • 1 year ago

The Eby NDP is undermining YOUR private property rights. The Haida deal means First Nations title could end up being applied to ALL private property in BC… This is a mess. #bcpoli

The Eby NDP is undermining YOUR private property rights. The Haida deal means First Nations title could end up being applied to ALL private property in BC… This is a mess. #bcpoli

John Rustad

205,158 views • 2 years ago

🚨 DID CARNEY GIVE VANCOUVER AWAY? 🚨 A recent agreement between Canada and the Musqueam First Nation has sparked confusion online, with some claiming Vancouver has been “handed over” and private property rights are gone. But what does the agreement actually say?

🚨 DID CARNEY GIVE VANCOUVER AWAY? 🚨 A recent agreement between Canada and the Musqueam First Nation has sparked confusion online, with some claiming Vancouver has been “handed over” and private property rights are gone. But what does the agreement actually say?

Northern Perspective

14,472 views • 5 months ago

ATTENTION: Join us for an Emergency townhall to hear about the details of the Musqueam agreement, private and public property rights, land claims, and more at the Prince of Wales High School auditorium on May 2nd at 2pm. We look forward to seeing you! RSVP:

ATTENTION: Join us for an Emergency townhall to hear about the details of the Musqueam agreement, private and public property rights, land claims, and more at the Prince of Wales High School auditorium on May 2nd at 2pm. We look forward to seeing you! RSVP:

Dallas Brodie

18,490 views • 4 months ago

🚨NO PROPERTY RIGHTS mean NO ECONOMY. That’s the reality under Premier David Eby’s NDP: Banks HESITATE. Investors FLEE. Sales STAGNATE. BC families are LEFT HOLDING THE BAG. The NDP offers spin and token assurances — nothing more. We can’t have Aboriginal Title on Private Property FULL STOP. BC needs certainty, confidence, and Conservatives in government.

🚨NO PROPERTY RIGHTS mean NO ECONOMY. That’s the reality under Premier David Eby’s NDP: Banks HESITATE. Investors FLEE. Sales STAGNATE. BC families are LEFT HOLDING THE BAG. The NDP offers spin and token assurances — nothing more. We can’t have Aboriginal Title on Private Property FULL STOP. BC needs certainty, confidence, and Conservatives in government.

Steve Kooner MLA

11,450 views • 7 months ago

🚨WATCH: Pierre Poilievre asked about property rights after British Columbia’s agreement with the Musqueam First Nation. Question: What, exactly, does Pierre Poilievre mean by “legitimate Canadians” when it comes to property rights? #cdnpoli #BritishColumbia

🚨WATCH: Pierre Poilievre asked about property rights after British Columbia’s agreement with the Musqueam First Nation. Question: What, exactly, does Pierre Poilievre mean by “legitimate Canadians” when it comes to property rights? #cdnpoli #BritishColumbia

Jason Pugh 🇨🇦 🏳️‍🌈

128,019 views • 5 months ago

[WATCH] Deputy SA President Paul Mashatile tells SABC News that he doesn't own a multimillion-rand property in Constantia, saying it belongs to his son-in-law and is a private property.

[WATCH] Deputy SA President Paul Mashatile tells SABC News that he doesn't own a multimillion-rand property in Constantia, saying it belongs to his son-in-law and is a private property.

SABC News

409,051 views • 1 year ago

🚨Indigenous law expert, Tom Isaac, says it plainly: reconciliation needs a BOOMING economy. Yet Premier Eby’s NDP is killing PIPELINES, FORESTRY, and MINING — the very industries that pay the bills. Now add this: 95% of BC is under land claims, and the NDP is ACCELERATING them — and the uncertainty hitting PRIVATE PROPERTY— with NO fiscal plan.

🚨Indigenous law expert, Tom Isaac, says it plainly: reconciliation needs a BOOMING economy. Yet Premier Eby’s NDP is killing PIPELINES, FORESTRY, and MINING — the very industries that pay the bills. Now add this: 95% of BC is under land claims, and the NDP is ACCELERATING them — and the uncertainty hitting PRIVATE PROPERTY— with NO fiscal plan.

Steve Kooner MLA

21,085 views • 8 months ago

This Musqueam decision keeps getting more insane. The Lower Mainland now has 4 bands trying to make aboriginal title claims over the land owned by the public and private owners. Mark Carney made this agreement and he needs to be held accountable!

This Musqueam decision keeps getting more insane. The Lower Mainland now has 4 bands trying to make aboriginal title claims over the land owned by the public and private owners. Mark Carney made this agreement and he needs to be held accountable!

Dallas Brodie

72,041 views • 5 months ago

🚨We keep hearing claims that the Cowichan “don’t want” the affected Richmond PRIVATE PROPERTY. That misses the point entirely. The court has granted ABORIGINAL TITLE over the affected private property in RICHMOND. Whether the COWICHAN choose to exercise that right to that private property is irrelevant — the legal right now exists and may be accessed. This COWICHAN DECISION directly affects the families who own those affected private properties, and it should concern all British Columbians. With 95% of British Columbia exposed to Indigenous land claims, this ruling creates UNCERTAINTY that can be repeated in other communities across the province. The NDP government should have acted to protect PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS before this issue reached a court ruling.

🚨We keep hearing claims that the Cowichan “don’t want” the affected Richmond PRIVATE PROPERTY. That misses the point entirely. The court has granted ABORIGINAL TITLE over the affected private property in RICHMOND. Whether the COWICHAN choose to exercise that right to that private property is irrelevant — the legal right now exists and may be accessed. This COWICHAN DECISION directly affects the families who own those affected private properties, and it should concern all British Columbians. With 95% of British Columbia exposed to Indigenous land claims, this ruling creates UNCERTAINTY that can be repeated in other communities across the province. The NDP government should have acted to protect PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS before this issue reached a court ruling.

Steve Kooner MLA

10,167 views • 8 months ago

Great breakdown of private property rights in BC and the uncertainty now surrounding them. 1⃣ Constitutionally, First Nations can only sell reserve land to the federal government — they cannot transfer it directly to non-FN Canadians 2⃣ The Musqueam transfer includes private property within the affected lands 3⃣ The transfer covers both federal and provincial lands 4⃣ The Cowichan tribes could potentially take full possession of lands in Richmond 5⃣In the Cowichan case, the court ruled that the Land Title Act does not apply

Great breakdown of private property rights in BC and the uncertainty now surrounding them. 1⃣ Constitutionally, First Nations can only sell reserve land to the federal government — they cannot transfer it directly to non-FN Canadians 2⃣ The Musqueam transfer includes private property within the affected lands 3⃣ The transfer covers both federal and provincial lands 4⃣ The Cowichan tribes could potentially take full possession of lands in Richmond 5⃣In the Cowichan case, the court ruled that the Land Title Act does not apply

Peyman Askari

26,868 views • 5 months ago

🇨🇦🦅🏡 : BC Premier David Eby implies the BC Supreme Court lied to him about ensuring private property would not be on the table in the Cowichan land treaty decision and admits it’s causing great uncertainty. Eby then says people are still able to sell their property but admits the court decision has likely impacted their property value. David also says he doesn’t know if people are having difficulty getting loans for their property, since the decision. How does he not know? Isn't the answer a simple phone call away?

🇨🇦🦅🏡 : BC Premier David Eby implies the BC Supreme Court lied to him about ensuring private property would not be on the table in the Cowichan land treaty decision and admits it’s causing great uncertainty. Eby then says people are still able to sell their property but admits the court decision has likely impacted their property value. David also says he doesn’t know if people are having difficulty getting loans for their property, since the decision. How does he not know? Isn't the answer a simple phone call away?

Bruce McGonigal

326,287 views • 9 months ago

The NDP is the party of unions, government workers, and big deficits. Nenshi doesn't care about you and I.

The NDP is the party of unions, government workers, and big deficits. Nenshi doesn't care about you and I.

Martyupnorth®- Unacceptable Fact Checker

41,057 views • 10 months ago

SHOCKING TAKEOVER: DRIPA & Secret Agreements Are STEALING Private Property Homes RIGHT NOW!! A First Nation on British Columbia's central coast is asserting ownership over privately held lands, basing its legal challenge on a landmark ruling from last summer's B.C. Supreme Court decision that paved the way for Indigenous title claims against private property. In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth explains how the BC NDP government, under Premier David Eby, is systematically stripping away your private property rights with Indigenous claims that now override the property you sweated for, saved for, built your dreams on, and thought was yours forever.

SHOCKING TAKEOVER: DRIPA & Secret Agreements Are STEALING Private Property Homes RIGHT NOW!! A First Nation on British Columbia's central coast is asserting ownership over privately held lands, basing its legal challenge on a landmark ruling from last summer's B.C. Supreme Court decision that paved the way for Indigenous title claims against private property. In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth explains how the BC NDP government, under Premier David Eby, is systematically stripping away your private property rights with Indigenous claims that now override the property you sweated for, saved for, built your dreams on, and thought was yours forever.

Dan Dicks

14,874 views • 6 months ago

🚨YOUR PRIVATE PROPERTY IS UNDER THREAT Most of British Columbia is covered in land claims. Private property is the foundation of our society, economy, and standard of living. Undermine it, and everything will collapse. Every available option must be on the table. If BC requires a Section 43 Constitutional Amendment to protect private property, then the Premier and Attorney General have a duty to do this NOW.

🚨YOUR PRIVATE PROPERTY IS UNDER THREAT Most of British Columbia is covered in land claims. Private property is the foundation of our society, economy, and standard of living. Undermine it, and everything will collapse. Every available option must be on the table. If BC requires a Section 43 Constitutional Amendment to protect private property, then the Premier and Attorney General have a duty to do this NOW.

Steve Kooner MLA

20,223 views • 8 months ago

Poilievre stands up for property rights in BC. Calls on Carney to fight for priority of fee simple home ownership over any other claim. Calls on Carney to vote down the Musqueam agreement. "No more land giveaways! Enough is Enough!"

Poilievre stands up for property rights in BC. Calls on Carney to fight for priority of fee simple home ownership over any other claim. Calls on Carney to vote down the Musqueam agreement. "No more land giveaways! Enough is Enough!"

Stephen Taylor

16,703 views • 11 days ago

David Eby and the NDP are feeling the anger from British Columbians over this government’s absolute disregard for property rights. Many of my constituents were thrown under the bus by the NDP decision not to argue extinguishment. David Eby is now in damage control mode, secretly sending a high-paid political staffer to engage with my constituents behind my back. The NDP secrecy and backroom deals must stop. Homeowners deserve respect, transparency and guaranteed property rights.

David Eby and the NDP are feeling the anger from British Columbians over this government’s absolute disregard for property rights. Many of my constituents were thrown under the bus by the NDP decision not to argue extinguishment. David Eby is now in damage control mode, secretly sending a high-paid political staffer to engage with my constituents behind my back. The NDP secrecy and backroom deals must stop. Homeowners deserve respect, transparency and guaranteed property rights.

Steve Kooner MLA

38,328 views • 9 months ago

.Pierre Poilievre in the House of Commons on his motion to demand Ottawa restore "extinguishment" argument that private property overrides Aboriginal title, and that Ottawa explicitly embed private property protection in any future First Nations agreement.

.Pierre Poilievre in the House of Commons on his motion to demand Ottawa restore "extinguishment" argument that private property overrides Aboriginal title, and that Ottawa explicitly embed private property protection in any future First Nations agreement.

Rob Shaw

10,333 views • 3 months ago