Video yükleniyor...
Video Yüklenemedi
🗣 The #NHLDraft is TWO days away! So SHAQ, Ryan Clark, Nathaniel E Burleson, Robert Griffin III, Rachel Nichols, Ric Flair® & Kenny Smith dropped some advice for our incoming picks. 🤩
3 Yorum
Joe3 yıl önce
@SHAQ @Realrclark25 @nateburleson @RGIII @Rachel__Nichols @RicFlairNatrBoy @TheJetOnTNT Announce DeBrincat for Adam Erne signing rights
David Cuddlehoff3 yıl önce
@SHAQ @Realrclark25 @nateburleson @RGIII @Rachel__Nichols @RicFlairNatrBoy @TheJetOnTNT This is awesome
idk whats going on3 yıl önce
@SHAQ @Realrclark25 @nateburleson @RGIII @Rachel__Nichols @RicFlairNatrBoy @TheJetOnTNT Knowing none of them niggas watch hockey😂
![Why is this easy for G. Edward Griffin to explain but hard for people to understand? "[The] people...running the show [have]... put... political actors on the stage to tell us what we want to hear... [and people will say Trump has] bad... advisors [but] he chose [them]." This clip of G. Edward Griffin (G. Edward Griffin), an author, speaker, researcher, President of Reality Zone, Faculty at Red Pill University, Host of Red Pill Expo, and Editor of Need To Know News, is taken from an interview with Brannon Howse (Brannon Howse) posted to the WorldviewTube (WorldviewTube) Rumble channel on August 12, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "But the bad guys, let's say the ones that are apparently running the show, could not have achieved the same thing under Harris, or Barack Obama or anybody else. They needed somebody who had the aura, of being Mr. Right, Mr. America, Mr. Conservative or Free market and so forth, because that's where the heart and the mind of the American public still is, even though it's being whittled away. They had to appeal to that. "And so, in my skeptical, view, Brannon, I think we have to take a deep breath and say maybe we've been fooled. Now we don't want to be fooled. You know, the old saying is it's harder to deceive somebody than it is to convince them that they've been deceived. And, I understand that because I've made some big mistakes myself, and I, you know, I stuck by them. I said this was not, I wasn't being tricked or anything. This. This guy is dependable. Well, it turns out he was a thief and stole a lot of money from us. And I was deceived, and I didn't want to admit it. "But let's go back to the main question here. We're talking about politics and not just money transactions. We're talking about big money transactions, actually, but more than money. We're talking about human control and power over nations and societies and everything. So, I have to go back and question the sincerity of our political leaders. "Now. I don't care. I'm not talking about Mr. Trump in particular or Mr. Any of them even. I know some of the best guys that we think we've had as presidents, like President Reagan, for example, has the aura, of being Mr. Conservative and so forth. But yet, look at what happened in the Reagan administration. We got, the free ticket for the, vaccines. We got some of the biggest spending that the government had ever done, even though the promise was that we're going to reduce the size of government. Government grew as usual. And, a lot of things were passed in the Reagan administration that were totally contrary to what the Reagan image was. "And of course, the, the press and the followers of Mr. Reagan, including myself, all rushed to the. To the conclusion that he must have had some bad advisors. Right? It's always, well, he's got, he's got. He's listening to wrong advice. If we could just give him the. I'm going to Send him a letter, I'm going to explain it to him, and then he'll see the light and, and all would change. My view is not that anymore. It used to be pretty much, I think that these people who are running the show actually deliberately put actors, let's call it what it really is, political actors on the stage to tell us what we want to hear. "And we will think, oh, this is going to be a change if we vote for this guy and put him in office. And then when this guy is in office, whoops, nothing changed, actually. And so we. Oh, he's got bad advice again from the advisors, by the way, which he chose. And most of them come from the Council on Foreign Relations, who, if you know anything about that group, you know, these people are dedicated to international government globalism based on the model of collectivism, which means a totalitarian system of government. "I don't care whether you call it communism, fascism, Nazism, socialism. I don't care that. Look at what it is. It's the same thing. And so I think what's going on is a great theater where we are given the illusion that we are choosing our own political destiny by voting one candidate or the other. And if you notice, there's an interesting trick there. People don't vote for anybody anymore. Most people don't vote for candidates. Anymore they vote against candidates. They say, I'm not so sure about either one of, them. I don't like either one of them, but I really hate the other guy. He scares me to death. So I'll vote for the lesser of two evils. "And that's how they niched us in step, little baby step by baby step, the lesser of two evils is still evil, and we're still buying into the collectivism that's been destroying the country, but in baby steps instead of big leaping bounds. And in that fashion we sit back and say, gosh, the guy is so good, I voted for him. I would never have voted. I would never have voted for a bad person. So since I voted for this person, he's a good man and he must have bad advisors. So now I think you got the gist of my opinion here. I think the whole political system today is corrupt and this."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1957137784575345128/amplify_video_thumb/1957133981528313857/img/TKLfxjjFdcKlrNTe.jpg)
![Whitney Webb, February 19, 2026: "[Cousin to the Rothschilds Jimmy] Goldsmith and [Robert] Maxwell basically come over [to the U.S.] and engage in these M&As, fronting for the Rothschild family... and then Epstein takes over the portfolio...[and] Evelyn de Rothschild... [was] very, very close to Jeffrey Epstein... And, again, I would argue that, if any family is untouchable, that's one of them. And I doubt investigators would get very far in probing that family." This clip of Webb (Whitney Webb), author of One Nation Under Blackmail and contributing editor of unlimitedhangout(.)com, is taken from an interview with Clayton Morris (Clayton Morris) and Natali Morris (Natali Morris) posted to the Redacted YouTube channel (Redacted) on February 19, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "But I've argued in my book that, you know, after Maxwell's death, Robert Maxwell's death in 1991, he pops up with Ghislaine in public for the first time and is for all intents and purposes the heir to Robert Maxwell's portfolio. Probably with Israeli intelligence and probably with some of the illicit financial operations that Maxwell was engaged with at the time. "And also his link with some of these organized crime networks I was talking about earlier. But why did Robert Maxwell come to the United States? He made this big entrance the into New York specifically a year or two before he died and brought Ghislaine with him. "And the reason he did that was specifically for the Rothschild banking family. And this is actually in a New York Times article that I reference in my book. I forget the exact title of the article but it's like, 'the Rothchilds' Mega Dealer' or something like that. But if you look it up on the archive dealer is spelled wrong. They switch like the E and the A for some reason, probably to make it harder for you to find. "But, basically, it says that the Rothschild banking dynasty, that at time, which was this article came out in the 1980s, they saw it as an error that they had never properly established a significant foothold on U.S. Wall Street. They had focused instead in Europe and other theaters. "And so in the 1980s, they created a Rothschild entity on Wall Street, and they had it focus on mergers and acquisitions, specifically M&As. And to do so they recorded— and to ensure their success they recruited some corporate raiders that they had a close relationship with from Britain. One of them was Robert Maxwell and the other one was Jimmy Goldsmith, who was a cousin to the Rothschilds and also involved in the same organized crime intelligence link nexus that Robert Maxwell was also tied to, via the Claremont Club, which I discuss in my book. "And Jimmy Goldsmith actually, Epstein was, met a lot of his elite friends in New York even though he's from there but in the elite circle for the first time actually at Jimmy Goldsmith's mansion in the area in the 1970s. Right after coming back from the United Kingdom on a backpacking trip when he dropped out of college, which, I would argue, it all kind of goes back to that crowd. "So Goldsmith and Maxwell basically come over and engage in these M&As, fronting for the Rothschild family specifically and then Epstein takes over the portfolio. And then, we know now, actually, it's been coming out, I think, since, there were new releases, of Epstein information, I think, in the year after my book came out. "So that would be 2023 or so, downstream of the USBI case, when it was settled. Talking about his ties to the de Rothschilds specifically, which is the French side of that banking dynasty. And if you have been paying attention, you would know for some time that Evelyn de Rothschild, in particular, very, very close to Jeffrey Epstein. "She actually wrote a letter to Bill Clinton in 1995. That he should meet Jeffrey Epstein and talk to him about currency stabilization. So this is something that's been going on for a long time. And he's been very involved with this particular family, which, it goes without saying, has extremely deep ties to the state of Israel, for an extremely long period of his career. "And, again, I would argue that, if any family is untouchable, that's one of them. And I doubt investigators would get very far in probing that family."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2024880094834029001/amplify_video_thumb/2024877460274458624/img/PwnRWUfbX-H3Rst1.jpg)
![Why Did Jack Smith ignore Biden family scandals when he was head of DOJs Public Integrity Section, tasked with investigating political corruption? In May 2014, the Obama/Biden White House was scrambling to deflect questions related to Hunter Biden’s new gig as a board member at Burisma, the compromised Ukrainian energy conglomerate; the news came just a few weeks after Vice President Joe Biden visited Kiev and promised Ukrainian leaders that the U.S. was “ready to assist” the country’s efforts to accelerate natural gas exploration. (At the time, Burisma was Ukraine's biggest natural gas producer.) The day after Burisma issued a public statement boasting about their latest hire, White House press secretary Jay Carney ducked questions about the younger Biden during a May 13, 2014 briefing: Reporter: On another subject, Hunter Biden has now taken a position with the largest oil and gas company--holding company in Ukraine. Is there any concern about at least the appearance of a conflict there--for the Vice President’s son to take a- Carney: I would refer you to the Vice President’s office. I saw those reports. Hunter Biden and other members of the Biden family are obviously private citizens and where they work does not reflect an endorsement by the administration or by the Vice President or President. But I would refer you to the Vice President’s office. Kendra Barkoff, a Biden spokeswoman, offered the same talking points in a terse statement to the media. “Hunter Biden is a private citizen and a lawyer. The vice president does not endorse any particular company and has no involvement with this company." During a State Department briefing later that day, Jen Psaki smirked away one question about the vice president's son, insisting it was of no concern to the agency. Nevertheless, major news outlets here and around the world continued to raise the improper, if not brazenly pay-to-play, nature of the arrangement. “Vice President Joe Biden's youngest son Hunter Biden has joined the board of directors of Ukraine's largest oil company at a time that the U.S. is urging Ukraine to develop energy independence from Russia and just days after the vice president visited Ukraine,” ABC News reported in May 2014, noting the fortuitous timing of the announcement. “The appointment of the vice president's son to a Ukrainian oil board looks nepotistic at best, nefarious at worst,” Adam Taylor, Washington Post foreign affairs reporter, surmised in a May 14, 2014 article. “No matter how qualified Biden is, it ties into the idea that U.S. foreign policy is self-interested. [You] have to wonder how big the salary has to be to put U.S. soft power at risk like this.” And despite Psaki’s spin, State Department officials soon after expressed concern about the “perception of a conflict of interest,” even taking those concerns to Vice President Joe Biden’s office in early 2015. But one person in official Washington seemed uninterested in the shady deal between a corrupt international gas company operating in a notoriously unstable country and America’s most troubled nepo-baby: Jack Smith. Smith—appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland last year to take over DOJs dual investigations into Donald Trump for alleged mishandling of classified documents and the events of January 6—was named chief of the Department of Justice’s Public Integrity Section, or PIN, in August 2010. Operating within the criminal division, PIN maintains broad purview over public corruption investigations on the federal, state, and local level including cases tied to “a government official…or someone associated with such an official,” according to the office’s annual report. Smith held that powerful position until February 2015—meaning Hunter Biden’s years-long board position with Burisma ultimately resulting in a $4 million windfall for the vice president’s son began right under Jack Smith’s nose. This is certainly contrary to what the public has been told about Jack Smith. The news media, “legal experts” in particular, insist Jack Smith is a no-nonsense federal prosecutor with unmatched integrity and devotion to the rule of law. Smith, according to his former DOJ colleague Andrew Weissmann, is a “consummate professional” and a “skilled and fast prosecutor who does not let the grass grow under his feet." So, what happened? How did the keen-eyed, apolitical Smith and his 30-plus lawyers miss what was happening just blocks from their DOJ offices? Perhaps Smith truly bought Burisma’s spin that the company selected Hunter based on his “expertise” in foreign policy and the law. Or perhaps Smith believed Hunter Biden when he said he would consult Burisma on matters relating to “transparency, corporate governance, and responsibility.” 😂 Maybe Smith was too busy prosecuting Republican governor Bob McDonnell and his wife at the time—a case later overturned by the Supreme Court—that he missed the international headlines of how a British government agency had seized $23 million in assets belonging to Burisma’s owner amid suspicions of money laundering the very same month Hunter was appointed to the board. Maybe Smith was just a tender heart who thought Hunter quickly turned over a new leaf. After all, Hunter had been discharged from the Naval reserves just three months before the Burisma appointment was announced. Hunter’s misadventures were among the worst kept secrets in Washington but maybe Smith was still reeling from his unsuccessful prosecution of former Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards to pay attention to Biden family gossip. And it wasn’t just the Burisma gig that somehow evaded Smith’s attention; Hunter made his overseas business dealings well known. He, along with fellow nepo-baby Christopher Heinz, stepson of then-Senator John Kerry, launched Rosemont Seneca in 2009. “Over the next seven years, as both Joe Biden and John Kerry negotiated sensitive and high-stakes deals with foreign governments, Rosemont entities secured a series of exclusive deals often with those same foreign governments,” investigative reporter Peter Schweizer wrote in his 2018 book. (Schweizer also noted that the private-equity firm did not open an office in New York City, the financial capital of the world, but in Washington, D.C., “just two miles from both Joe Biden’s office in the White House and his residence at the Naval Observatory.”) Multiple deals were cut as Smith led the government’s most powerful “public corruption” unit. And some of the most lucrative arrangements were with Chinese businesses tied to the Chinese Communist Party, partnerships that just happened to coincide with Hunter’s trips to China with his father. “[The 2013 trip to China] was a triumph for Hunter, who walked away with his first big deal in China—the Bohai Harvest Rosemont investment partnership,” Miranda Devine wrote in her 2021 book, “Laptop From Hell.” Devine explained the deal was consummated on December 16, 2013, “twelve days after he flew into Beijing on Air Force Two. Hunter officially became a shareholder and member of the BHR board.” Smith probably missed the July 2014 article in the Wall Street Journal touting the private equity partnership with the vice president’s son aimed at enriching the CCP. “The funds are raising a combination of yuan and U.S. dollars. The effort is the latest example [of] private equity pushing boundaries in an area that China hopes will help drive the country's economic transformation.” Now, perhaps there was nothing untoward about Hunter Biden’s sudden interest and success at global private equity. But surely the use of Air Force Two to conduct personal business—Hunter accompanied his father on 70 overseas trips including six trips to China on Smith’s watch—should have caught someone’s attention at DOJs “public integrity” unit, no? The answer, of course, is no. Was Smith asleep at the switch or intentionally ignorant or once again doing the dirty work of the Democratic Party? Smith have put a stop to the Biden family international shakedown nearly a decade ago--why didn't he? At what risk did he put the country by turning a blind eye to this egregious level of influence peddling in nations hostile to American interests? As Smith eagerly prepares to sign his name to another criminal indictment against Donald Trump for the events of January 6, Hunter Biden’s plea deal with Smith’s employer is falling apart along with further confirmation of how the younger Biden hauled in millions from countries such as China and Ukraine by leveraging his last name to support himself, his addictions, and his family—including, quite possibly, his father as well. All of this could have been halted in its tracks long ago. And the person primarily responsible for letting it get to this point is none other than Jack Smith.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1684638849543098368/ext_tw_video_thumb/1684635684290646016/pu/img/I4qaa2S07VyMB48v.jpg)
