The North Tower disintegration vs controlled demolition. Put on your thinking cap

DEW

The Berlin Wall fell for a reason. It would be foolish to consider trying to rebuild it - and all it represents - today.

I believe they use the electrical system in the Twin towers and building 7 in some sort of way like the way the smart meters in Lahaina Hawaii.

Notice building 7 is not even on fire

All we do is talk about it and do nothing while looney toons run the streets with anti trump signs because they are to stupid to realize their own government has been stealing from them for the last 20 years

@RealWsiegrist The 9/11 Building 7 HOAX Building 7 did NOT go down to fire or explosives. Article:

Note the light flickering when the second plane hit? Seen on the video taken from the ground close up.

Dang, happens every time I detonate a nuke. Those pesky EMPs

Ładunek pirotechniczny składający się z termitu, uranu lub radu i nanotechnologii zmieniło strukturę stałą betonu i stali w pył rozbijając wiązania atomowe. Bardzo ukrywana technologia.

WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001? The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on… Article:

Notice the highly magnetized core where the initial explosion takes place, as it drops at free fall, you can see the centre sucks the dust back into the core creating the spectacle - most people don't notice it for all the 'shock and awe'...

As a host you should really hold your bias. Your supposed to be a middle man. Lol.

I think it had something to do with a plane hitting it.

The Two Tours and the Sears Tower were built to hold small nuclear charges in the bottom to bring them down fast.

Nukes - The distraction behind door no 3 Official narrative – Jet fuel. Option behind door no 1 – explosives, door no 2 – thermite, door no 3 – buried or mini nukes. Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology, that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does) Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no. Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no. Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no. Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no. The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence. The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence. The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves. Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence. Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11 1. Problem solving skills 2. Group Think 3. They just can't handle the implications

There was a vast Radio/TV antenna on top of that building.

Interesting…

All those white dots in the film at the same time too

DI not CD

No controlled demolition works from top to bottom. Never. So, a multi story block (more than 10) , falling down because of the total disrupted foundations, because of the exploding planes and the burnings afterwards, still are the most reasonable explanations for what we saw.

What could have turned thousands of tonnes of structural steel and concrete to dust within seconds?

Don’t be silly, that’s the behavior that can be expected.