Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🇺🇸🇻🇪 THE PEACE PRESIDENT PARADOX: WHY VENEZUELA WOULD UNDO EVERYTHING TRUMP'S BUILT Trump spent his first year back claiming credit for ending wars he inherited, negotiating ceasefires he didn't broker, and positioning himself as the president who brings troops home instead of sending them out. That carefully cultivated image...

25,859 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Trump’s Henchmen Keep Calling Their War Slut President A Peacemaker The US State Department has renamed the US Institute of Peace the Donald J Trump Institute of Peace, proclaiming that it did so “to reflect the greatest dealmaker in our nation’s history.” “President Trump will be remembered by history as the President of Peace,” tweeted Secretary of State Marco Rubio on the announcement. Earlier this year the president’s intelligence chief Tulsi Gabbard made a similar social media post, tweeting that “President Trump IS the President of Peace. He is ending bloodshed across the world and will deliver lasting peace in the Middle East.” This would be the same President Trump who has bombed Somalia more times in the last year than presidents Joe Biden and Barack Obama did in their combined twelve years in office. The same President Trump who is bombing boats in the Caribbean and openly ramping up for a disastrous regime change military intervention in Venezuela at this very moment, with his Chairman of the Joint Chiefs declaring that Americans can expect a coming war “in our neighborhood”. The same President Trump who has spent an entire year pouring weapons into the horrific US proxy war in Ukraine despite promising throughout his entire campaign to end the conflict on day one. The same President Trump who helped Israel incinerate Gaza for months before suckering the world with a fake “ceasefire” deal which as of this writing has seen at least 373 Palestinians murdered by Israel in just two months since taking effect, while a nightmarish surveillance system is constructed around the survivors. The same President Trump who risked a horrifying escalation in the middle east by bombing Iran. The same President Trump who slaughtered hundreds of civilians in his murderous bombing campaign in Yemen earlier this year. The same President Trump who spent all year ignoring the UAE-backed genocide in Sudan until he was given a nudge by none other genocidal Saudi tyrant Mohammed bin Salman. The same President Trump who spent his entire first term advancing the longstanding agendas of warmongering DC swamp monsters by starving Venezuela, backing Saudi Arabia’s genocidal atrocities in Yemen, ramping up cold war escalations against Russia which paved the way to the conflict in Ukraine, imprisoning Julian Assange for exposing US war crimes, staging brutal regime change ops in Iran, occupying Syrian oil fields with the goal of facilitating regime change, assassinating General Soleimani, and expanding the US murder machine around the world. This rhetoric about Trump being the “President of Peace” is just that: rhetoric. It’s words. This administration has been taking credit for resolving a bunch of conflicts it either made up, didn’t help resolve, or was an active belligerent in, while in actual reality turning the gears of the imperial war machine as rapidly as any other president the United States has ever had. Trump campaigned on being a president of peace and continues to stake his personal reputation on big talk about peacemaking, but in terms of concrete action he’s just as much of a warmonger as the psychopaths who came before him. There is no basis to continue to support Trump if you are opposed to war. You can support him because he “triggers the libs” or “fights wokeness” or whatever other dopey culture war reason you want if that’s what you’re into, because he absolutely does feed into that nonsense. But if you support him because you think he’s making peace, draining the swamp, or sticking up for the little guy, you’re just plain delusional. Reading by Tim Foley:

Caitlin Johnstone

21,105 views • 8 months ago

I don't want a forever war with Iran and neither do you. The American people have no appetite for the neocon forever wars that we saw in Afghanistan and Iraq under both Republicans and Democrats in Washington, DC. President Trump has spoken out against forever wars for his entire public life. If you and I are being honest with ourselves, President Trump probably spoke out against forever wars before either of us did. There's a small assumption being perpetuated that we only have two options in these situations: a forever war or no military action. But this isn't true. It's not a binary choice between isolationism and neoconism. We can use the military to neutralize threats, complete our objectives in 4-6 weeks, and get out. This is exactly what President Trump has done his entire presidency. The best predictor of future behavior is past behavior. Look at President Trump's first year of his second term. In Operation Rough Rider against the Houthis in March-May 2025, we struck the terrorist group for 7 weeks and it was over. In Operation Midnight Hammer in June 2025, Panicans were freaking out about Trump striking Iran's nuclear facilities. They were telling us that Trump was starting World War 3. Trump ended that war with Iran in just 12 days. There was no World War 3, there was no forever war. In Operation Absolute Resolve in January 2026, President Trump deposed Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro and extradited him to the United States in a Nike jumpsuit to face trial, all in a matter of hours. In all three of these prior military campaigns, we went in, neutralized the threats, completed the objectives, and got out. I'm not going to pretend to know what will happen in Iran in the coming days and weeks. But I will tell you that sitting here today, I have confidence that President Trump will not allow us to be dragged into a forever war.

Liz Wheeler

22,248 views • 5 months ago

I voted for Trump every time he ran for President and I can't believe what he has become. Trump just claimed that he could've "won" the Vietnam & Iraq wars in five months "Five months. I would have won Vietnam, very quickly. I would have, if I were president. I would have won Iraq in the same amount of time." Then he said we would have won would have won the Afghanistan war. I guess Trump is suffering from cognitive decline because he presided over the Afghanistan war for four years! It's terrifying that Trump actually believes this nonsense that he is rambling about. Sounds like grounds to invoke the 25th amendment. Trump is clearly losing it. It appears that he is suffering with delusions of grandeur. It's easy for Trump to talk tough about sending other people's children to fight an unnecessary war while Barron Trump and his other children are living in the lap of luxury as they always have. I'm going to be straight with you, we have already lost Trump's Iran War for Israel. Even if Trump were to declare a fake victory and end the war today, we have already lost. Trump fractured the America First coalition which is now two factions, MIGA and America First. America First voters could never stand the Uniparty GOP, but they voted for Trump thinking he could change the party. Instead of changing the party, he doubled down by supporting the worst people the Republican party has to offer, like Tel Aviv Ted Cruz, Lindsey Graham, John Thune and Speaker Johnson. We have lost brave soldiers in this unnecessary war. America has already wasted 60 billion dollars on this war and this number will continue to climb. We are in the beginning of a massive global energy crisis and Americans are paying dearly at the gas pump and grocery store. This crisis will spiral out of control in the coming months. This war has undone all the progress that Trump made with the US economy. Of course the stock market it doing fine, thanks to market manipulation, so wealthy investors are fine. It's the real Americans that work and provide real value for society that are suffering the most. Trump does not care. There is no winning the Iran War. We the people will be left holding the bag long after Trump is out of office. Trump's Iran blunder will guarantee Democrats win big in the midterms and make him a lame duck President. Then the Democrats will impeach and obstruct everything Trump tries to do. Trump's sudden change has is so bizarre that it has me questioning if Trump is putting the Democrats back in power intentionally. Was this always the Uniparty's plan? Israel got the war they wanted, now Democrats will take power and say, " we just can't leave Iran there will be a power vacuum and terrorists will take over." It's so predictable. The Uniparty always wins. So what do you think? Would Trump have won the Vietnam war in 5 months?

Thomas Paine Band

40,546 views • 4 months ago

Globalist stooge Maria Corina Machado is now openly campaigning for a SECOND regime change operation in Venezuela because the first isn't enough. So, what's really going on here? I believe Trump executed a 'fake' Regime Change Op in order to intercept the real one Globalists have been planning for a decade, and attempting, in various stages. By 'taking out' Nicholas Maduro (by extracting him, staging photo ops with him and basically getting mad about how Maduro does the Trump dance even better than Trump does the Trump dance, according to actual retarded media reports,) Trump has essentially siphoned the energy from the enemy's color revolution and rug-pulled its final stage. Keep in mind, Maduro's administration still controls Venezuela, at Trump's behest and on his authority. This will not do for the National Endowment for Democracy or the ghost of USAID, both of which have donated millions to Machado's campaigns en route to her winning a Nobel Peace Prize that was denied to President Trump, which is just about the cleanest reverse indicator you're ever likely to get in the Info War. By swapping Maduro out with his second-in-command, Trump is baiting the enemy into attempting to drum up support for a SECOND color revolution in as many weeks, because they didn't get the one they wanted the first time around. Russia is considering following the same playbook in Ukraine. And China may in Taiwan, because Trump has granted them the Narrative Shielding to do so, while depriving the Globalists of that very thing by slamming the door shut on Machado's legitimacy while shattering the carefully-cultivated illusion of her public mandate. In other words, Trump (and yes, Maduro) steered Venezuela into the path of the torpedo before it could arm itself. And very, very few in the so-called Truth Community have figured this out. Pro tip: when you find yourself cheering for the same things as characters who represent the NED, USAID, WEF and NATO ... you just might have gotten rugged.

BurningBright

83,970 views • 7 months ago

THOMAS MASSIE on Trump trying to whip his vote on the 2020 restatement that war powers resides with Congress "His argument... [was] that he could bluff Iran into doing what he wanted" "[But that would've] given [Trump] the power to declare war without Congress's involvement" "he didn't convince me. I did vote for the resolution that restated the Constitution... says you got to come to Congress if you want to have a war with Iran" "his first mistake may have been making Marco Rubio Secretary of State" "his second mistake would be letting Lindsey Graham on that airplane so many times, whispering in his ear" "finally, [maybe his] biggest mistake is letting Israel control too much of his policy. Perhaps it was taking $200 million from Miriam Adelson" This clip of Massie (Thomas Massie) is taken from an interview with James Patrick (James Patrick) posted to YouTube on May 21, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "In January of 2020, I had a conversation with President Trump about war with Iran. Now, to put this in context, they killed Soleimani, not on Iranian soil, but in Iraq. And he was an Iranian general. And then, we had a drone flying over there, and they shot it down. "Now, whether it was over Iran or over the water, I don't know. Maybe we'll never know. But at that point, the president threatened to take action against Iran for that, and he was being encouraged to do so by members of his cabinet. "So we had a vote here in Congress in January of 2020, and the President heard that I was going to vote for no war. Basically, the vote was a restatement of the Constitution and that war powers resided in Congress. It was to say that President Trump cannot go to war with Iran without an act of Congress. "There were only three Republicans who voted for that. But the president heard that I was going to vote for it. So he called me up to whip me on this vote, and he said, I'm more, anti-war than you are. And I said, well, you— In fact, you are. You've not started a war. You're the first president that hasn't started a war. "Now, remember, this was his fourth year in office, 2020. You're the first president that hasn't started a war that I could vote for since I was 18. And he said, I guess you're right. Thank you for saying that. "His argument to me was that if we didn't constrict his ability to rattle the sabers and threaten war, that he could bluff Iran into doing what he wanted and therefore avoid war. And they said, well, that would work just fine unless they call your bluff. And then now we've given you the power to declare war without Congress's involvement, and you're obligated to war if your intention was to bluff. Now you're obligated to war. "And, that day, he didn't convince me. I did vote for the resolution that restated the Constitution that says you got to come to Congress if you want to have a war with Iran. Now, fortunately, that war did not happen. But here we are in his second term, and I think he's— "You know, his first mistake may have been making Marco Rubio Secretary of State. And then his second mistake would be letting Lindsey Graham on that airplane so many times, whispering in his ear. And then, you know, finally, it may be the biggest mistake is letting Israel control too much of his policy. Perhaps it was taking $200 million from Miriam Adelson. "That was a mistake that, I think, led largely to him being predisposed to listening to Israel's interests over America's interests with regard to war with Iran."

Sense Receptor

65,082 views • 2 months ago

Venezuela has VAST amounts of gold that were being pillaged from their lands and sent to countries like China while the citizens of Venezuela got NONE of the profits from their own natural resources and were left in squaller, abused by globalists elites that install dictators in countries to allow such things to happen. President Trump is fighting to take back control of America's survival by ensuring we remain the economic powerhouse of the world. For that to happen, he knows we need 2 things: We need our manufacturing back - which he's doing. We also need rare earth minerals for that manufacturing. We need gold for circuit boards and chips - and LOTS of it. China has become the superpower they are because they have the monopoly in manufacturing AND precious Earth minerals because our politicians ALLOWED this to happen. If we don't go in and take control of Venezuela, China will remain in control of it. Let President Trump BE THE BIGGER BULLY - for America. President Trump will slay as many of our enemies as he has to in order to ensure ignorant people (libs) in our country can lay warm and cozy under heated blankets on cold wintery nights. President Trump is going into Venezuela and removing the globalist rot, taking over ALL of their operations for mining that America needs and he absolutely WILL ensure FAIR deals are NOW being made with the Venezuelan citizens AFTER the rot used by globalist elites are removed. In a few months time you'll see billions of our green paper fiat dollars flowing to Venezuelans so they can REBUILD. Understand that this is a business transaction in return for vast amounts of natural resources that we need for manufacturing, that Venezuelans can't eat and have no use for. For the first time in modern history, we're watching a President and his Secretary of War using our military as mercenaries on behalf of America's interests instead of the interests of globalist foreign superpowers in England and China. Sit down, tune out stupid influencers and Fake News media, and let President Trump / Hegseth cook and grab your popcorn because... 1776-v2 is here.

Bridgett Fertig

270,388 views • 7 months ago

Patrick Bet-David: The biggest winner of the Iran war is whoever runs for president in 2028 While everyone is arguing over whether the war was a success or a disaster, Patrick says the real story is that the conflict exposed everyone's hand. Who stood with America, who backed Israel, who backed Iran, and who folded under pressure. In Patrick's words, the Iran war was like running a credit check on the entire world. Everybody's real incentives were suddenly out in the open. Then he said something that made Trump's decision make a lot more sense. Patrick doesn't believe Trump went to war because he suddenly became a neocon. He believes Trump thought he was taking the biggest gamble of his presidency, a moonshot. He thought the regime would collapse, and he could pull off the equivalent of Reagan staring down the Soviet Union, and walk away as the president who fundamentally reshaped the Middle East. Instead, the regime stayed in power, and the U.S found itself negotiating with the same government it had just bombed. Patrick isn't saying the gamble worked, he's saying Trump took it because the upside was potentially historic. Then, almost casually, Patrick dropped something I wasn't expecting. He revealed that senior figures connected to Iranian politics, business and the military repeatedly approached him about helping lead a post-regime Iran because of his years living there and his deep understanding of both Iran and America. He turned them down. Not because he doubted he could do it, but because he wasn't willing to uproot his family and build a future that way. Whether you agree with Patrick or not, I think he nailed one thing. This war didn't just reshape the Middle East. It exposed the real priorities, loyalties, and ambitions of almost everyone who mattered. And we're still only beginning to understand what that means. Patrick Bet-David

Mario Nawfal

600,847 views • 1 month ago