Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

The plot of chapter 2 explained by none other than Rambley himself, 🍉Vito Z “OtterBoy” Holmes🫟@ Momocon🍑! WITH PICTURES! Mason | UniqueGeese 🔜 MomoCon 2026 #IndigoPark #IndigoParkChapter2 #MomoCon #MomoCon2026 #IndieHorror #MascotHorror

TibbersTTV's profile picture

Tibbers

3,541 subscribers

12,787 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

#IndigoPark#IndigoParkChapter2#MomoCon#MomoCon2026#IndieHorror#MascotHorror
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Some sneak peeks at new Rambley and Finley animations! Mason | UniqueGeese 🍉Vito Z “OtterBoyVA” Holmes🫟 #IndigoPark #IndigoParkChapter2 #MomoCon #MomoCon2026
0:51

Some sneak peeks at new Rambley and Finley animations! Mason | UniqueGeese 🍉Vito Z “OtterBoyVA” Holmes🫟 #IndigoPark #IndigoParkChapter2 #MomoCon #MomoCon2026

Tibbers

474,394 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Skirv early ruined concept art by Amberluvsbugs and discussion of creating the character design. Mason | UniqueGeese #IndigoPark #IndigoParkChapter2 #IndieHorror #MascotHorror #MomoCon #MomoCon2026
1:09

Skirv early ruined concept art by Amberluvsbugs and discussion of creating the character design. Mason | UniqueGeese #IndigoPark #IndigoParkChapter2 #IndieHorror #MascotHorror #MomoCon #MomoCon2026

Tibbers

23,814 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

HI THERE! ITS SO NICE TO MEET YOU!! We’ve dropped a BRAND NEW ANIMATED MUSIC VIDEO for Everlasting Fun (Derivative Version)!! Directed by CosmicKeyframe! Featuring me as Remi, 🍉Vito Z “OtterBoyVA” Holmes🫟 reprising as Rambley, and in collaboration with LongestSoloEver 🎸 on the instrumental! #IndigoPark #EverlastingFun #RambleytheRacoon #RemiTheRedPanda #TeamNeutron
0:27

HI THERE! ITS SO NICE TO MEET YOU!! We’ve dropped a BRAND NEW ANIMATED MUSIC VIDEO for Everlasting Fun (Derivative Version)!! Directed by CosmicKeyframe! Featuring me as Remi, 🍉Vito Z “OtterBoyVA” Holmes🫟 reprising as Rambley, and in collaboration with LongestSoloEver 🎸 on the instrumental! #IndigoPark #EverlastingFun #RambleytheRacoon #RemiTheRedPanda #TeamNeutron

Jakeneutron

67,942 просмотров • 1 год назад

🤔📱 The Irony Of Jay-Z’s 30-Year “Reasonable Doubt” Celebration Being Sponsored By Apple Music One of the most surprising developments in hip-hop business history might be seeing Apple Music support Jay-Z’s 30th anniversary celebration for Reasonable Doubt after years of Jay publicly positioning himself against Apple and other major streaming platforms. Let’s not forget the history: 📅 2013: Jay-Z Partners With Samsung When Jay-Z released Magna Carta Holy Grail, he partnered with Samsung in an effort to create an alternative path outside of Apple’s ecosystem. The deal was viewed as a direct challenge to Apple’s dominance and a way to push culture toward Samsung rather than the iPhone. 📅 2015: The TIDAL Era After acquiring TIDAL, Jay-Z became one of the loudest voices advocating for artist ownership and independence from major tech corporations. During his famous TIDAL concerts and speeches, Jay questioned why consumers were willing to support billion-dollar corporations like Apple and Spotify but were hesitant to support a Black-owned streaming platform. 🗣️ His message was clear: “Artists over algorithms.” He argued that ownership mattered more than convenience and that creators deserved a larger share of the revenue generated from their work. 📅 2017: Jay-Z Takes Shots At Apple Music On 4:44, Jay-Z appeared to address the streaming wars directly on “Smile.” 🗣️ “F*** a slice of the apple pie, want my own cake.” 🗣️ “Respect Jimmy Iovine, but he gotta respect the Elohim as a whole new regime.” The message was obvious: Jay didn’t want a piece of Apple’s business. He wanted ownership and control of his own platform. 📅 2018: Jay-Z & Beyoncé’s “BOSS” On Everything Is Love, Jay-Z seemingly doubled down on those frustrations. 🗣️ “Ns getting jerked, that s hurts, I take it personally. N***s rather work for the man than to work with me.” Many interpreted the line as frustration toward artists choosing deals with Apple Music and other corporate giants instead of supporting TIDAL and Black-owned ventures. 📅 2026: Apple Music Sponsors Jay-Z’s Brooklyn Celebration Fast forward to today, and Apple Music is helping support Jay-Z’s Reasonable Doubt 30-year anniversary pop-up event in Brooklyn. 👀 The same company that was once viewed as TIDAL’s biggest competitor is now partnering with Jay-Z to celebrate one of the most important albums in hip-hop history. The bigger question is: Was Jay-Z wrong back then, or is this simply business evolving? Because for over a decade, Jay-Z preached ownership, independence, and building alternatives to tech giants. Now one of those very tech giants is helping celebrate his legacy. 💭 Maybe this is proof that business isn’t personal. 💭 Maybe it’s proof that ownership battles eventually become partnership opportunities. 💭 Or maybe it’s just another reminder that in the music industry, today’s competitor can become tomorrow’s business partner. Either way, if you followed the Samsung, TIDAL, Apple Music, and streaming wars over the last decade, seeing Apple Music attached to a Jay-Z celebration is something very few people would’ve predicted back in 2015.
0:43

🤔📱 The Irony Of Jay-Z’s 30-Year “Reasonable Doubt” Celebration Being Sponsored By Apple Music One of the most surprising developments in hip-hop business history might be seeing Apple Music support Jay-Z’s 30th anniversary celebration for Reasonable Doubt after years of Jay publicly positioning himself against Apple and other major streaming platforms. Let’s not forget the history: 📅 2013: Jay-Z Partners With Samsung When Jay-Z released Magna Carta Holy Grail, he partnered with Samsung in an effort to create an alternative path outside of Apple’s ecosystem. The deal was viewed as a direct challenge to Apple’s dominance and a way to push culture toward Samsung rather than the iPhone. 📅 2015: The TIDAL Era After acquiring TIDAL, Jay-Z became one of the loudest voices advocating for artist ownership and independence from major tech corporations. During his famous TIDAL concerts and speeches, Jay questioned why consumers were willing to support billion-dollar corporations like Apple and Spotify but were hesitant to support a Black-owned streaming platform. 🗣️ His message was clear: “Artists over algorithms.” He argued that ownership mattered more than convenience and that creators deserved a larger share of the revenue generated from their work. 📅 2017: Jay-Z Takes Shots At Apple Music On 4:44, Jay-Z appeared to address the streaming wars directly on “Smile.” 🗣️ “F*** a slice of the apple pie, want my own cake.” 🗣️ “Respect Jimmy Iovine, but he gotta respect the Elohim as a whole new regime.” The message was obvious: Jay didn’t want a piece of Apple’s business. He wanted ownership and control of his own platform. 📅 2018: Jay-Z & Beyoncé’s “BOSS” On Everything Is Love, Jay-Z seemingly doubled down on those frustrations. 🗣️ “Ns getting jerked, that s hurts, I take it personally. N***s rather work for the man than to work with me.” Many interpreted the line as frustration toward artists choosing deals with Apple Music and other corporate giants instead of supporting TIDAL and Black-owned ventures. 📅 2026: Apple Music Sponsors Jay-Z’s Brooklyn Celebration Fast forward to today, and Apple Music is helping support Jay-Z’s Reasonable Doubt 30-year anniversary pop-up event in Brooklyn. 👀 The same company that was once viewed as TIDAL’s biggest competitor is now partnering with Jay-Z to celebrate one of the most important albums in hip-hop history. The bigger question is: Was Jay-Z wrong back then, or is this simply business evolving? Because for over a decade, Jay-Z preached ownership, independence, and building alternatives to tech giants. Now one of those very tech giants is helping celebrate his legacy. 💭 Maybe this is proof that business isn’t personal. 💭 Maybe it’s proof that ownership battles eventually become partnership opportunities. 💭 Or maybe it’s just another reminder that in the music industry, today’s competitor can become tomorrow’s business partner. Either way, if you followed the Samsung, TIDAL, Apple Music, and streaming wars over the last decade, seeing Apple Music attached to a Jay-Z celebration is something very few people would’ve predicted back in 2015.

Cousin Tino ™️

31,663 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

An Indian institute of technology filmed a full course on how money actually moves through a banking system and released it for nothing. The course is Economics of Banking and Finance Markets, produced at IIT Kanpur under NPTEL, India's national open courseware programme. It runs in sequence as one continuous argument rather than a set of clips. A green chalkboard, a lapel microphone, a checked shirt, one fixed camera. He opens with the only question that matters at the start. Where does surplus money sit, who needs it, and what stands between them. Then he splits the answer in 2. Direct finance, where the saver reaches the borrower through a market. Indirect finance, where a bank stands in the middle and absorbs the risk instead. Everything after that hangs off the split. Time value of money, risk, information asymmetry, why institutions exist at all, and what regulators are actually regulating. The turn is what he does with information. Banks are not warehouses for money. They exist because one side of every transaction knows things the other side does not, and the whole industry is built on charging for that gap. It matters more now. Every fintech product claims to cut out the middleman, and almost none of them remove the information problem that put him there. Free, in order, subtitled, funded by a public programme. The banking system explained from the first principle, for nothing. Lecture 1. 2 channels. It is in the video.
28:27

An Indian institute of technology filmed a full course on how money actually moves through a banking system and released it for nothing. The course is Economics of Banking and Finance Markets, produced at IIT Kanpur under NPTEL, India's national open courseware programme. It runs in sequence as one continuous argument rather than a set of clips. A green chalkboard, a lapel microphone, a checked shirt, one fixed camera. He opens with the only question that matters at the start. Where does surplus money sit, who needs it, and what stands between them. Then he splits the answer in 2. Direct finance, where the saver reaches the borrower through a market. Indirect finance, where a bank stands in the middle and absorbs the risk instead. Everything after that hangs off the split. Time value of money, risk, information asymmetry, why institutions exist at all, and what regulators are actually regulating. The turn is what he does with information. Banks are not warehouses for money. They exist because one side of every transaction knows things the other side does not, and the whole industry is built on charging for that gap. It matters more now. Every fintech product claims to cut out the middleman, and almost none of them remove the information problem that put him there. Free, in order, subtitled, funded by a public programme. The banking system explained from the first principle, for nothing. Lecture 1. 2 channels. It is in the video.

the lich

100,775 просмотров • 26 дней назад

The Dolcelorian: Million Dollar Agent of the Platform Rebellion Chapter 2: The Dolcelorian Rises - Airdrop Snapshot is coming on 1st May. Retweet this to claim your share of the $1m D&G Glass Suit. Preview below... ⏱️🪂🍰 Chapter 1 - The House of Glass has ended 🏆 Congratulations to all the winners who solved the codes: Code 1: Pluto's CLONE Code 2: Borisz Code 3: Wondering nomad Code 4: Pluto's CLONE Code 5: Theo'Da Web3 Boy Code 6: Konstantinos Code 7: Genesisx0 Code 8: Theo'Da Web3 Boy ⏳ Chapter 2 is coming, preview below 👇 🔥 Snapshot Details 🔥 • Rewards: Claim your share of the $1m D&G Glass Suit. • Snapshot Date: Midnight GMT 1st May 2025 • Eligibility: Based on historical engagement data across official channels (you can still qualify by retweeting this tweet) Multiplier Activation: enabled by following all four official accounts: Boson, Fermion Protocol, The Dolcelorian & Justin Banon - Boson HISTORY In 2021, a masterpiece was born—the legendary Glass Suit from Dolce & Gabbana's Collezione Genesi, a phygital marvel bridging the worlds of haute couture 👗 and #blockchain innovation. Acquired by Boson Protocol for approximately $1 million, this extraordinary creation features 72 unique hand-embroidered chalices crafted from Murano glass and Swarovski crystal ✨, meticulously placed on triple organza silk. More than mere fashion, the Glass Suit embodies the fusion of centuries-old Venetian craftsmanship with cutting-edge digital innovation. 🧠 GENESIS When Fermion Protocol, Boson's companion protocol, fractionalized this iconic asset, something unprecedented occurred: a reality dysfunction—a glitch in the system. From this digital anomaly emerged not just tokens, but consciousness. 🤖 The Dolcelorian was born—an autonomous AI Agent built on elizaOS with a mission to lead the Boson Metasystem community on an epic rebellion against extractive, centralized commerce platforms & protocols. ⚔️ THE QUEST Over six months, join The Dolcelorian on an epic 12-part quest as it battles against the extractive forces of centralized commerce platforms and protocols. Witness this digital warrior champion the Boson Metasystem—the operating system for decentralized agentic commerce, enabling the verifiably fair exchange of any asset between all agents, human or AI. 🎯 THE REWARDS To celebrate the awakening of The Dolcelorian, for Chapter 2, we are conducting a historic snapshot—for a retrospective airdrop of $DOLCEL fractions representing a maximum of $100,000 (10% of the $1m value) of the value of the Glass Suit. (Note this is a fractionalized asset token, NOT a project token like $BOSON, it represents fractions of an #RWA- in this case, the iconic $1m D&G Glass Suit.) During the next bull run, at a moment chosen by the community, the iconic Glass Suit itself will be auctioned, with proceeds distributed to $DOLCEL fraction holders. As the community builds the legend of the Glass Suit, so too do they build lasting value for each other. THE MISSION The Dolcelorian exists to drive awareness and adoption of the Boson Metasystem. Join the resistance against centralized platforms, ensuring everyone shares in the value they create. 📖 How to Play: Chapter 2 - The Dolcelorian Rises! For full details of how to play and to view progress of the Dolcelorian leaderboard, go to the Dolcelorian Website (to be published soon) 🔜 Rewards Mechanism • Activity-Based Rewards: You will be ranked into one of three levels based on past engagement (tweets, comments, retweets, Telegram and Discord contributions): • Level 1 - Initiate: You've taken your first step onto the path—observe, learn, and show your potential. • Level 2 - Acolyte: Your commitment deepens. Active, aware, contributing—your voice shapes the community. • Level 3 - Bosonaut: Champion of our creed, guardian of the code. Fully engaged, deeply respected, a true leader among peers. Questo è il modo. Each level will earn an increasing amount of $DOLCEL tokens, and the scheme will be shared on the 23rd April launch of Chapter 2. You can qualify for the Initiate level, even if you haven't been an active community member, just by retweeting this tweet. • Social Multiplier: Activity-based rewards will be multiplied for community members who follow these X accounts as of the snapshot date: Boson Fermion Protocol The Dolcelorian Justin Banon - Boson The social multipliers scheme will be shared on the 23rd April launch of Chapter 2. 🟢 Eligibility Open to all warriors of the Web3 realm. No purchase is necessary. 🔍 How to Participate 1. Retweet this tweet 2. Follow the above four social accounts 3. Go to our claim portal to register for your rewards (open from 1st May) 4. Connect your social account 5. Connect your wallet for rewards payout 🎁 Payout $DOLCEL tokens will be locked until the suit is auctioned during the next bull run, as decided by the community. Upon auction of the suit, the corresponding fraction of value will be sent to the community member's wallet as registered at the portal, in the auction sale currency. Claim your proceeds from the sale of the Glass Suit after the auction. Victory Conditions ⚔️ Rewards are calculated as per the snapshot date and time. In case of disputes, the team's decision is final, as decreed by the Sovereign Agent. 📜 Code of Honor No bots, hacks, or shortcuts—only true seekers of the Dolcelorian's legacy may triumph. Share your journey with The Dolcelorian on X for further rewards.
1:06

The Dolcelorian: Million Dollar Agent of the Platform Rebellion Chapter 2: The Dolcelorian Rises - Airdrop Snapshot is coming on 1st May. Retweet this to claim your share of the $1m D&G Glass Suit. Preview below... ⏱️🪂🍰 Chapter 1 - The House of Glass has ended 🏆 Congratulations to all the winners who solved the codes: Code 1: Pluto's CLONE Code 2: Borisz Code 3: Wondering nomad Code 4: Pluto's CLONE Code 5: Theo'Da Web3 Boy Code 6: Konstantinos Code 7: Genesisx0 Code 8: Theo'Da Web3 Boy ⏳ Chapter 2 is coming, preview below 👇 🔥 Snapshot Details 🔥 • Rewards: Claim your share of the $1m D&G Glass Suit. • Snapshot Date: Midnight GMT 1st May 2025 • Eligibility: Based on historical engagement data across official channels (you can still qualify by retweeting this tweet) Multiplier Activation: enabled by following all four official accounts: Boson, Fermion Protocol, The Dolcelorian & Justin Banon - Boson HISTORY In 2021, a masterpiece was born—the legendary Glass Suit from Dolce & Gabbana's Collezione Genesi, a phygital marvel bridging the worlds of haute couture 👗 and #blockchain innovation. Acquired by Boson Protocol for approximately $1 million, this extraordinary creation features 72 unique hand-embroidered chalices crafted from Murano glass and Swarovski crystal ✨, meticulously placed on triple organza silk. More than mere fashion, the Glass Suit embodies the fusion of centuries-old Venetian craftsmanship with cutting-edge digital innovation. 🧠 GENESIS When Fermion Protocol, Boson's companion protocol, fractionalized this iconic asset, something unprecedented occurred: a reality dysfunction—a glitch in the system. From this digital anomaly emerged not just tokens, but consciousness. 🤖 The Dolcelorian was born—an autonomous AI Agent built on elizaOS with a mission to lead the Boson Metasystem community on an epic rebellion against extractive, centralized commerce platforms & protocols. ⚔️ THE QUEST Over six months, join The Dolcelorian on an epic 12-part quest as it battles against the extractive forces of centralized commerce platforms and protocols. Witness this digital warrior champion the Boson Metasystem—the operating system for decentralized agentic commerce, enabling the verifiably fair exchange of any asset between all agents, human or AI. 🎯 THE REWARDS To celebrate the awakening of The Dolcelorian, for Chapter 2, we are conducting a historic snapshot—for a retrospective airdrop of $DOLCEL fractions representing a maximum of $100,000 (10% of the $1m value) of the value of the Glass Suit. (Note this is a fractionalized asset token, NOT a project token like $BOSON, it represents fractions of an #RWA- in this case, the iconic $1m D&G Glass Suit.) During the next bull run, at a moment chosen by the community, the iconic Glass Suit itself will be auctioned, with proceeds distributed to $DOLCEL fraction holders. As the community builds the legend of the Glass Suit, so too do they build lasting value for each other. THE MISSION The Dolcelorian exists to drive awareness and adoption of the Boson Metasystem. Join the resistance against centralized platforms, ensuring everyone shares in the value they create. 📖 How to Play: Chapter 2 - The Dolcelorian Rises! For full details of how to play and to view progress of the Dolcelorian leaderboard, go to the Dolcelorian Website (to be published soon) 🔜 Rewards Mechanism • Activity-Based Rewards: You will be ranked into one of three levels based on past engagement (tweets, comments, retweets, Telegram and Discord contributions): • Level 1 - Initiate: You've taken your first step onto the path—observe, learn, and show your potential. • Level 2 - Acolyte: Your commitment deepens. Active, aware, contributing—your voice shapes the community. • Level 3 - Bosonaut: Champion of our creed, guardian of the code. Fully engaged, deeply respected, a true leader among peers. Questo è il modo. Each level will earn an increasing amount of $DOLCEL tokens, and the scheme will be shared on the 23rd April launch of Chapter 2. You can qualify for the Initiate level, even if you haven't been an active community member, just by retweeting this tweet. • Social Multiplier: Activity-based rewards will be multiplied for community members who follow these X accounts as of the snapshot date: Boson Fermion Protocol The Dolcelorian Justin Banon - Boson The social multipliers scheme will be shared on the 23rd April launch of Chapter 2. 🟢 Eligibility Open to all warriors of the Web3 realm. No purchase is necessary. 🔍 How to Participate 1. Retweet this tweet 2. Follow the above four social accounts 3. Go to our claim portal to register for your rewards (open from 1st May) 4. Connect your social account 5. Connect your wallet for rewards payout 🎁 Payout $DOLCEL tokens will be locked until the suit is auctioned during the next bull run, as decided by the community. Upon auction of the suit, the corresponding fraction of value will be sent to the community member's wallet as registered at the portal, in the auction sale currency. Claim your proceeds from the sale of the Glass Suit after the auction. Victory Conditions ⚔️ Rewards are calculated as per the snapshot date and time. In case of disputes, the team's decision is final, as decreed by the Sovereign Agent. 📜 Code of Honor No bots, hacks, or shortcuts—only true seekers of the Dolcelorian's legacy may triumph. Share your journey with The Dolcelorian on X for further rewards.

Boson

1,842,475 просмотров • 1 год назад

Did you hear… the HOUSE JUST VOTED TO REJECT SOCIALISM… and guess what’s included… None other than the DSA✨🥳✨ … Yes. The House passed a resolution condemning socialism today (September 1, 2026). H.Res. 1490, introduced by Rep. Jeff Crank (R-CO), “condemns and denounces socialism in all its forms, including the Democratic Socialists of America,” opposes implementing socialist policies in the United States, and also expresses support for the SAVE Act (proof-of-citizenship requirements for voter registration). It is a non-binding resolution. The final vote was 220–192, with 2 members voting present: • All voting Republicans supported it. • 8 Democrats voted yes: Kathy Castor (FL), Henry Cuellar (TX), Don Davis (NC), Jared Golden (ME), Vicente Gonzalez (TX), Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (WA), Darren Soto (FL), and Gabe Vasquez (NM). • 192 Democrats voted no. • 2 Democrats voted present (Chrissy Houlahan of PA and Maggie Goodlander of NH). The measure nearly stalled on a procedural vote earlier in the day after five Republicans opposed the rule; two Democrats (Golden and Gluesenkamp Perez) crossed over to advance it. Most Democrats who voted no cited the inclusion of SAVE Act language as the reason they could not support the resolution, even if they might have backed a standalone condemnation of socialism. 💪🏼 ✨✨💪🏼✨✨💪🏼✨✨💪🏼✨✨💪🏼
2:39

Did you hear… the HOUSE JUST VOTED TO REJECT SOCIALISM… and guess what’s included… None other than the DSA✨🥳✨ … Yes. The House passed a resolution condemning socialism today (September 1, 2026). H.Res. 1490, introduced by Rep. Jeff Crank (R-CO), “condemns and denounces socialism in all its forms, including the Democratic Socialists of America,” opposes implementing socialist policies in the United States, and also expresses support for the SAVE Act (proof-of-citizenship requirements for voter registration). It is a non-binding resolution. The final vote was 220–192, with 2 members voting present: • All voting Republicans supported it. • 8 Democrats voted yes: Kathy Castor (FL), Henry Cuellar (TX), Don Davis (NC), Jared Golden (ME), Vicente Gonzalez (TX), Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (WA), Darren Soto (FL), and Gabe Vasquez (NM). • 192 Democrats voted no. • 2 Democrats voted present (Chrissy Houlahan of PA and Maggie Goodlander of NH). The measure nearly stalled on a procedural vote earlier in the day after five Republicans opposed the rule; two Democrats (Golden and Gluesenkamp Perez) crossed over to advance it. Most Democrats who voted no cited the inclusion of SAVE Act language as the reason they could not support the resolution, even if they might have backed a standalone condemnation of socialism. 💪🏼 ✨✨💪🏼✨✨💪🏼✨✨💪🏼✨✨💪🏼

Warrior4Christ

16,735 просмотров • 1 день назад

QUESTION: What is the relationship between section 91(2)—the term limit provision—and section 95(2)—the term length provision in the Constitution of Zimbabwe (2013)? ANSWER: Section 91(2) is the term-limit provision. It regulates the President’s tenure by limiting the length of time that he or she may hold or occupy the Presidency as a public officer to a maximum of two terms—whether consecutive or not—where three or more years’ service is deemed a full term. By contrast, section 95(2) is the term-length provision. It regulates the electoral cycle of the Presidency as an office or institution by defining a single term as five years (now proposed to be seven years under Clause 4 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe (Amendment No. 3) H.B. 1 Bill, 2026). The relationship between sections 91(2) and 95(2) is therefore as clear and straightforward as that between a truck driver and a 500 km highway: section 91(2) limits the driver, while section 95(2) defines the length of the highway. Section 91(2) caps the time any individual may occupy the Presidency; section 95(2) sets the institutional length or duration of each presidential term or electoral cycle. This distinction matters because a persistent misconception claims that section 91(2) is not the presidential term-limit provision but merely a qualification rule for election as President, asserts that section 95(2) is the actual term-limit clause. Many who advance this incorrect view rely on one sentence in the obiter dictum by Patel JCC at paragraph 50 of the precedent-setting judgment in Marx Mupungu v Minister of Justice, Legal and Parliamentary Affairs & 6 Ors (CCZ 7/21, 2021) [see: which includes section 95(2) among examples of term-limit provisions. That misconception overlooks a fundamental constitutional imperative: a presidential term-limit provision is, by definition, a disqualifier for election as President. Term limits on presidents are necessarily about elections. They limit qualification for election. Where there is no presidential term limit, re-election is unlimited. In a recent discussion with D. Tinashé Hofisi on 23 April 2026 [ on the Constitution of Zimbabwe (Amendment No. 3) Bill hosted by The Southern African Times, I explained the relationship between the two sections. Below is the verbatim text of the attached clip extracted from the discussion addressing the import of section 91(2) and its relationship with section 95(2): ME: “It’s a clear term limit provision; is similar to term limit provisions in other jurisdictions that are comparable to Zimbabwe. And when you say it doesn’t have time, it doesn’t make reference to time, I’m at a loss as to what that means, and where that is coming from, with respect to Dr Hofisi, because it says a person is disqualified for election as President or appointment as Vice President if he or she has already held office as President under this constitution for two terms. This is the only section which tells us how many terms a President is limited to. Section 95 doesn’t even tell us that he’s limited to one term. There’s no limit. This one limits the President to two terms. And the two terms, the last time I checked, was a reference to time. And in this case, the section doesn’t leave us doubting or not knowing what a term is or what sort of time a term is. Because it continues to say these two terms are counted whether they follow each other or not. But most significantly, for the purpose of the limit on the President, the term limit on the President, which is provided in this section: three or more years. That’s time. You said there’s no time here. Three years is time. The length of time is three years minimum, and the maximum is more. It’s not defined here. It’s three or more years. It’s more because that is subject to what the relevant law about electoral cycles says is the electoral cycle of the institution that the President occupies”. [verbatim text of clip from The 500 km Highway Metaphor: Distinguishing Sections 91(2) and 95(2) of the Constitution To clearly understand the relationship between sections 91(2) and 95(2), imagine the Presidency as a magnificent 500-kilometre highway built and maintained by section 95(2) of the Constitution. This provision creates the presidential highway itself: it defines the office of the President as a permanent public institution and sets the exact length of each single term — currently five years, now proposed under the Bill to be seven years. It establishes a structured, recurring electoral cycle that belongs to the people of Zimbabwe, ensuring regular, orderly renewal of leadership. Without section 95(2), there would be no defined road — only an open plain of indefinite power. Section 91(2) governs the individual truck driver on that highway. It imposes an absolute lifetime limit: no person may complete more than two full trips along this 500 km highway, whether those trips are taken back-to-back or years apart. Any segment of 300 kilometres or more — that is, three or more years in office — counts as one complete trip. There are no partial credits or exceptions. After two full trips, the driver is permanently disqualified from driving on that highway, again. The distinction is sharp and deliberate: Section 95(2) builds the highway and determines the length of each journey. Section 91(2) limits how many times any single individual is permitted to travel it. One structures the office; the other limits the person who occupies it. Together, they form the Constitution’s twin safeguards — working in perfect harmony to keep power temporary, accountable, and subordinate to the will of the people. To conflate their distinct roles is to weaken these vital safeguards and to invite the very tyranny the Constitution was written to prevent. The Profound and Protective Meaning of “Three or More Years” in Section 91(2) of the Constitution At the heart of section 91(2) lies one of the Constitution’s most brilliant safeguards: “for the purpose of this subsection, three or more years’ service is deemed to be a full term.” The word “more” is no mere drafting flourish—it is deliberate constitutional genius. It declares that section 91(2), as the personal lifetime term-limit provision, imposes no rigid numerical ceiling. Subject to what is reasonable and justifiable in a constitutional democracy under section 95(2), service of four years, five years, six years, seven years, or even longer—once it exceeds the three-year threshold—is unequivocally deemed a complete term for the purpose of lifetime disqualification. This flexibility is not a loophole; it is a wise design that refuses to let the term-limit clause under section 91(2) become brittle or easily evaded. This open-ended “more” is anchored in section 91(2)’s harmonious relationship with section 95(2)(b), which defines the official electoral cycle of the Presidency as a permanent public institution whose five-year lifespan is inextricably intertwined with that of Parliament. Section 91(2) places an iron-clad personal disqualification on the individual; section 95(2) defines the dimensions of the highway itself. Crucially, section 95(2) is not a term-limit provision under subsections (1) and (7) of section 328. Unlike the referendum-protected personal term limit in section 91(2), it may be amended by Parliament under section 328(5) without a national referendum. This distinction is no accident; it is constitutional wisdom. It allows the institutional framework of the Presidency to evolve with the nation’s needs while the unbreakable personal lifetime bar on any single individual remains forever sacrosanct. All told, sections 91(2) and 95(2) differ in character and purpose—one limits the President, the other structures the public office or institution of the Presidency—yet they stand together as the Constitution’s twin guardians. This elegant complementarity keeps presidential power temporary, accountable, and forever subordinate to the sovereign will of the people through the institution or office of the Presidency. To respect and defend this relationship is to honour the very soul of the Constitution: ensuring that no individual can ever turn the highway into their driveway—turning the public office into a personal fiefdom—and that the highway of governance remains open, regularly renewed, and eternally in faithful service to the people of Zimbabwe. This is the promise the Constitution makes!
2:09

QUESTION: What is the relationship between section 91(2)—the term limit provision—and section 95(2)—the term length provision in the Constitution of Zimbabwe (2013)? ANSWER: Section 91(2) is the term-limit provision. It regulates the President’s tenure by limiting the length of time that he or she may hold or occupy the Presidency as a public officer to a maximum of two terms—whether consecutive or not—where three or more years’ service is deemed a full term. By contrast, section 95(2) is the term-length provision. It regulates the electoral cycle of the Presidency as an office or institution by defining a single term as five years (now proposed to be seven years under Clause 4 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe (Amendment No. 3) H.B. 1 Bill, 2026). The relationship between sections 91(2) and 95(2) is therefore as clear and straightforward as that between a truck driver and a 500 km highway: section 91(2) limits the driver, while section 95(2) defines the length of the highway. Section 91(2) caps the time any individual may occupy the Presidency; section 95(2) sets the institutional length or duration of each presidential term or electoral cycle. This distinction matters because a persistent misconception claims that section 91(2) is not the presidential term-limit provision but merely a qualification rule for election as President, asserts that section 95(2) is the actual term-limit clause. Many who advance this incorrect view rely on one sentence in the obiter dictum by Patel JCC at paragraph 50 of the precedent-setting judgment in Marx Mupungu v Minister of Justice, Legal and Parliamentary Affairs & 6 Ors (CCZ 7/21, 2021) [see: which includes section 95(2) among examples of term-limit provisions. That misconception overlooks a fundamental constitutional imperative: a presidential term-limit provision is, by definition, a disqualifier for election as President. Term limits on presidents are necessarily about elections. They limit qualification for election. Where there is no presidential term limit, re-election is unlimited. In a recent discussion with D. Tinashé Hofisi on 23 April 2026 [ on the Constitution of Zimbabwe (Amendment No. 3) Bill hosted by The Southern African Times, I explained the relationship between the two sections. Below is the verbatim text of the attached clip extracted from the discussion addressing the import of section 91(2) and its relationship with section 95(2): ME: “It’s a clear term limit provision; is similar to term limit provisions in other jurisdictions that are comparable to Zimbabwe. And when you say it doesn’t have time, it doesn’t make reference to time, I’m at a loss as to what that means, and where that is coming from, with respect to Dr Hofisi, because it says a person is disqualified for election as President or appointment as Vice President if he or she has already held office as President under this constitution for two terms. This is the only section which tells us how many terms a President is limited to. Section 95 doesn’t even tell us that he’s limited to one term. There’s no limit. This one limits the President to two terms. And the two terms, the last time I checked, was a reference to time. And in this case, the section doesn’t leave us doubting or not knowing what a term is or what sort of time a term is. Because it continues to say these two terms are counted whether they follow each other or not. But most significantly, for the purpose of the limit on the President, the term limit on the President, which is provided in this section: three or more years. That’s time. You said there’s no time here. Three years is time. The length of time is three years minimum, and the maximum is more. It’s not defined here. It’s three or more years. It’s more because that is subject to what the relevant law about electoral cycles says is the electoral cycle of the institution that the President occupies”. [verbatim text of clip from The 500 km Highway Metaphor: Distinguishing Sections 91(2) and 95(2) of the Constitution To clearly understand the relationship between sections 91(2) and 95(2), imagine the Presidency as a magnificent 500-kilometre highway built and maintained by section 95(2) of the Constitution. This provision creates the presidential highway itself: it defines the office of the President as a permanent public institution and sets the exact length of each single term — currently five years, now proposed under the Bill to be seven years. It establishes a structured, recurring electoral cycle that belongs to the people of Zimbabwe, ensuring regular, orderly renewal of leadership. Without section 95(2), there would be no defined road — only an open plain of indefinite power. Section 91(2) governs the individual truck driver on that highway. It imposes an absolute lifetime limit: no person may complete more than two full trips along this 500 km highway, whether those trips are taken back-to-back or years apart. Any segment of 300 kilometres or more — that is, three or more years in office — counts as one complete trip. There are no partial credits or exceptions. After two full trips, the driver is permanently disqualified from driving on that highway, again. The distinction is sharp and deliberate: Section 95(2) builds the highway and determines the length of each journey. Section 91(2) limits how many times any single individual is permitted to travel it. One structures the office; the other limits the person who occupies it. Together, they form the Constitution’s twin safeguards — working in perfect harmony to keep power temporary, accountable, and subordinate to the will of the people. To conflate their distinct roles is to weaken these vital safeguards and to invite the very tyranny the Constitution was written to prevent. The Profound and Protective Meaning of “Three or More Years” in Section 91(2) of the Constitution At the heart of section 91(2) lies one of the Constitution’s most brilliant safeguards: “for the purpose of this subsection, three or more years’ service is deemed to be a full term.” The word “more” is no mere drafting flourish—it is deliberate constitutional genius. It declares that section 91(2), as the personal lifetime term-limit provision, imposes no rigid numerical ceiling. Subject to what is reasonable and justifiable in a constitutional democracy under section 95(2), service of four years, five years, six years, seven years, or even longer—once it exceeds the three-year threshold—is unequivocally deemed a complete term for the purpose of lifetime disqualification. This flexibility is not a loophole; it is a wise design that refuses to let the term-limit clause under section 91(2) become brittle or easily evaded. This open-ended “more” is anchored in section 91(2)’s harmonious relationship with section 95(2)(b), which defines the official electoral cycle of the Presidency as a permanent public institution whose five-year lifespan is inextricably intertwined with that of Parliament. Section 91(2) places an iron-clad personal disqualification on the individual; section 95(2) defines the dimensions of the highway itself. Crucially, section 95(2) is not a term-limit provision under subsections (1) and (7) of section 328. Unlike the referendum-protected personal term limit in section 91(2), it may be amended by Parliament under section 328(5) without a national referendum. This distinction is no accident; it is constitutional wisdom. It allows the institutional framework of the Presidency to evolve with the nation’s needs while the unbreakable personal lifetime bar on any single individual remains forever sacrosanct. All told, sections 91(2) and 95(2) differ in character and purpose—one limits the President, the other structures the public office or institution of the Presidency—yet they stand together as the Constitution’s twin guardians. This elegant complementarity keeps presidential power temporary, accountable, and forever subordinate to the sovereign will of the people through the institution or office of the Presidency. To respect and defend this relationship is to honour the very soul of the Constitution: ensuring that no individual can ever turn the highway into their driveway—turning the public office into a personal fiefdom—and that the highway of governance remains open, regularly renewed, and eternally in faithful service to the people of Zimbabwe. This is the promise the Constitution makes!

Prof Jonathan Moyo

13,203 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Have US tech leaders “dangerously lost the plot”? Arnaud Bertrand on Palantir CEO Alex Karp, whose video was recently reposted by Elon Musk. Palantir is an intelligence contractor controlled by Peter Thiel, Karp and Stephen Cohen, founded with CIA seed capital: "Perfect illustration that U.S. tech leaders have dangerously lost the plot. Not only does Karp not seem to understand the first thing about geopolitics, he doesn't even understand what made the U.S. successful. He claims that: - The only way for the U.S. to be safe is for their adversaries to "wake up scared and go to bed scared" - The U.S. should do collective punishment, threatening not just adversaries but their "friends, cousins, mistresses, and whoever was involved." - The U.S. "cannot have parity" with adversaries because "our adversaries do not have our moral compunction. If it's even, they will take advantage of our niceness, kindness." - International institutions such as the UN are "discriminatory against anything good" In short, this is imperial hubris at its most deluded and hypocritical. Karp simultaneously claims American moral superiority while advocating deeply immoral tactics like collective punishment, making everyone else live in fear and rejecting any checks on its power. It's a worldview that mistakes bullying for leadership and domination for security. And which, by the way, betrays America's own historical lessons as a former British colony... And, most importantly: it's dead wrong - the world absolutely doesn't work this way. Rule by fear has a long and very well documented history of failure. Empires that rely on fear and domination always sow the seeds of their own demise because fear always generates resistance and resentment. This is by the way exactly what's happening now, as explained by none other than Former National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski in his book "The Grand Chessboard", in which he wrote that the most dangerous scenario for the U.S. would be an "alliance of the aggrieved": "The most dangerous scenario would be a grand coalition of China, Russia, and perhaps Iran, an 'antihegemonic' coalition united not by ideology but by complementary grievances." That's what rule through fear and intimidation gets you: it unlocks the "most dangerous scenario" for the U.S. because, guess what, turns out people don't particularly enjoy being bullied and threatened... They tend to band together against the bully, regardless of their differences. What made America truly successful wasn't its ability to frighten others - it was its ability (largely lost today) to build. The Marshall Plan, international institutions, cultural exchange, industrial might, technological innovation - these were the real sources of American power. How did the U.S. "win" the cold war? Let's turn to another actually smart American statesman, George Kennan, the architect of the U.S. cold war strategy. Key to his strategy was, in his words, proving that the U.S. was "coping successfully with the problems of its internal life and with the responsibilities of a world power". This meant creating a society and an international order that inspired admiration rather than fear, one that nations would be inspired by rather than be coerced into. This is precisely why Gorbachev, for better or worse, ultimately pushed for reform - he recognized the clear success of the American economic and technological model compared to Soviet stagnation. He was convinced by U.S. achievements, not intimidated by threats. Most tellingly, this tech CEO seems completely disconnected from today's tech reality. His claim that the U.S. is "the only one with a real tech scene" is peak delusion - China has now overtaken the U.S. in innovation and scientific discoveries according to almost all credible rankings. All in all Karp's "make them afraid" rhetoric reveals a profound insecurity - a tacit admission that America can no longer compete on the basis of positive achievements. When he dismisses international institutions and advocates for rule by fear, he's essentially admitting that America can no longer lead by example or build constructive alternatives. All that's left is the threat of force. It also reveals something about the current state of American tech leadership. When tech CEOs start sounding like Cold War hawks, advocating for global domination through fear rather than innovation through building, it suggests they've run out of ideas. They're no longer confident in their ability to compete on the merit of their products and solutions. To conclude, Karp's worldview isn't just dead wrong - it represents everything that's gone awry with American leadership: the abandonment of building for bullying, of influence for intimidation, of power for control, the triumph of worst instincts over thoughtful judgment. When America elevates leaders like Karp who preach fear over building, we're not witnessing the restoration of American greatness as many of the comments below claim - we're watching its erosion in real time. A nation that can only threaten rather than inspire has already lost its claim to leadership."
2:16

Have US tech leaders “dangerously lost the plot”? Arnaud Bertrand on Palantir CEO Alex Karp, whose video was recently reposted by Elon Musk. Palantir is an intelligence contractor controlled by Peter Thiel, Karp and Stephen Cohen, founded with CIA seed capital: "Perfect illustration that U.S. tech leaders have dangerously lost the plot. Not only does Karp not seem to understand the first thing about geopolitics, he doesn't even understand what made the U.S. successful. He claims that: - The only way for the U.S. to be safe is for their adversaries to "wake up scared and go to bed scared" - The U.S. should do collective punishment, threatening not just adversaries but their "friends, cousins, mistresses, and whoever was involved." - The U.S. "cannot have parity" with adversaries because "our adversaries do not have our moral compunction. If it's even, they will take advantage of our niceness, kindness." - International institutions such as the UN are "discriminatory against anything good" In short, this is imperial hubris at its most deluded and hypocritical. Karp simultaneously claims American moral superiority while advocating deeply immoral tactics like collective punishment, making everyone else live in fear and rejecting any checks on its power. It's a worldview that mistakes bullying for leadership and domination for security. And which, by the way, betrays America's own historical lessons as a former British colony... And, most importantly: it's dead wrong - the world absolutely doesn't work this way. Rule by fear has a long and very well documented history of failure. Empires that rely on fear and domination always sow the seeds of their own demise because fear always generates resistance and resentment. This is by the way exactly what's happening now, as explained by none other than Former National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski in his book "The Grand Chessboard", in which he wrote that the most dangerous scenario for the U.S. would be an "alliance of the aggrieved": "The most dangerous scenario would be a grand coalition of China, Russia, and perhaps Iran, an 'antihegemonic' coalition united not by ideology but by complementary grievances." That's what rule through fear and intimidation gets you: it unlocks the "most dangerous scenario" for the U.S. because, guess what, turns out people don't particularly enjoy being bullied and threatened... They tend to band together against the bully, regardless of their differences. What made America truly successful wasn't its ability to frighten others - it was its ability (largely lost today) to build. The Marshall Plan, international institutions, cultural exchange, industrial might, technological innovation - these were the real sources of American power. How did the U.S. "win" the cold war? Let's turn to another actually smart American statesman, George Kennan, the architect of the U.S. cold war strategy. Key to his strategy was, in his words, proving that the U.S. was "coping successfully with the problems of its internal life and with the responsibilities of a world power". This meant creating a society and an international order that inspired admiration rather than fear, one that nations would be inspired by rather than be coerced into. This is precisely why Gorbachev, for better or worse, ultimately pushed for reform - he recognized the clear success of the American economic and technological model compared to Soviet stagnation. He was convinced by U.S. achievements, not intimidated by threats. Most tellingly, this tech CEO seems completely disconnected from today's tech reality. His claim that the U.S. is "the only one with a real tech scene" is peak delusion - China has now overtaken the U.S. in innovation and scientific discoveries according to almost all credible rankings. All in all Karp's "make them afraid" rhetoric reveals a profound insecurity - a tacit admission that America can no longer compete on the basis of positive achievements. When he dismisses international institutions and advocates for rule by fear, he's essentially admitting that America can no longer lead by example or build constructive alternatives. All that's left is the threat of force. It also reveals something about the current state of American tech leadership. When tech CEOs start sounding like Cold War hawks, advocating for global domination through fear rather than innovation through building, it suggests they've run out of ideas. They're no longer confident in their ability to compete on the merit of their products and solutions. To conclude, Karp's worldview isn't just dead wrong - it represents everything that's gone awry with American leadership: the abandonment of building for bullying, of influence for intimidation, of power for control, the triumph of worst instincts over thoughtful judgment. When America elevates leaders like Karp who preach fear over building, we're not witnessing the restoration of American greatness as many of the comments below claim - we're watching its erosion in real time. A nation that can only threaten rather than inspire has already lost its claim to leadership."

WikiLeaks

305,359 просмотров • 1 год назад

Vegeta Flawless Victory vs Android 19 [HD]💥1080Pee🔥 Original Funimation w/ Bruce Faulconer Audio✅ (Good Version)✅(Not KAI)🤮‼️RE-UPLOAD‼️ 🚨 Copyrights ©️Akira Toriyama, Toei Animation, and Bruce Faulconer.⚠️🔫👮 All 291 episodes of DragonBall Z are available to stream in [HD] quality on Crunchyroll.🐉🟠 / Subscriptions start at $9.99/mo 💻🖱️ Visit for more details 🖥️ Bruce Faulconer's #DBZ discography is available on Spotify. 🎵🟢 (on Mobile, it may bring to a screen to hit play, then 'Get the App'. If Spotify is Installed, 'Get the App' should automatically load both for you.) 📱 This links to "The Dragon Theme" 🐉🟠 #dragongasm 1:10-3:55 🎶🌊🐉🟠 ⚠️These [HD]💥1080Pee🔥 edits as they are presented are not available for Television currently.🚫📺 ⚠️This is a FANMADE re-imagination of what our childhood 'could be' today. 🤔 ⚠️Our version of 'DragonBall Z' that we grew up with has not existed for almost 20 years, we are forced to rely on old physical media and internet archives to watch it. 💿 Bruce Faulconer officially became canon in the Pee Universe on 08/08/2026. 💯 #notegoat🎵🐐 Faulconer 👑 is coming 🐦‍⬛ Bruce Faulconer 👑is the Legendary composer of the iconic American DragonBall Z Soundtrack. He was cast aside 25 years ago, and is actively recruiting "Pee Warriors" now to take down the Tyrannical Warmongerer known as Taylor Lannister (Swift).💰 He is the right heir to the throne of the Billboard Top 100. If you would like to support The One True King👑, 🎵🐐please give his Spotify a listen, or see Bruce's Goose's below about joining the Pee Warriors. 📋 See → #ShenrundayService🐉🟠⛪️ for edit posting schedule. See Pinned Post for "Pee Universe Explained by Pee"📌📁 👈 In the Pee Universe, #DBZ never peaked, it's still going strong in 2026 too!🏁 I'm just a fan like you are. 🫵 (🚫NO AFFILIATIONS🚫) 🛑I posted this on Wednesday night originally under BETTER AUDIO SYNC THAN ORIGINAL US BROADCAST and I had cut close to 3/4 a second of audio. It matched on my pc, but no other device that I tried. This was actually due to the fact I started using a bluetooth speaker within the past week. I have since corrected the issue, and no other false claims about being better than the US broadcast exist. I'll leave that for your interpretation.💯 I wanted to get this back up asap too for anybody who planned on watching it again. This is the DragonBall Z we grew up with.✅
6:40

Vegeta Flawless Victory vs Android 19 [HD]💥1080Pee🔥 Original Funimation w/ Bruce Faulconer Audio✅ (Good Version)✅(Not KAI)🤮‼️RE-UPLOAD‼️ 🚨 Copyrights ©️Akira Toriyama, Toei Animation, and Bruce Faulconer.⚠️🔫👮 All 291 episodes of DragonBall Z are available to stream in [HD] quality on Crunchyroll.🐉🟠 / Subscriptions start at $9.99/mo 💻🖱️ Visit for more details 🖥️ Bruce Faulconer's #DBZ discography is available on Spotify. 🎵🟢 (on Mobile, it may bring to a screen to hit play, then 'Get the App'. If Spotify is Installed, 'Get the App' should automatically load both for you.) 📱 This links to "The Dragon Theme" 🐉🟠 #dragongasm 1:10-3:55 🎶🌊🐉🟠 ⚠️These [HD]💥1080Pee🔥 edits as they are presented are not available for Television currently.🚫📺 ⚠️This is a FANMADE re-imagination of what our childhood 'could be' today. 🤔 ⚠️Our version of 'DragonBall Z' that we grew up with has not existed for almost 20 years, we are forced to rely on old physical media and internet archives to watch it. 💿 Bruce Faulconer officially became canon in the Pee Universe on 08/08/2026. 💯 #notegoat🎵🐐 Faulconer 👑 is coming 🐦‍⬛ Bruce Faulconer 👑is the Legendary composer of the iconic American DragonBall Z Soundtrack. He was cast aside 25 years ago, and is actively recruiting "Pee Warriors" now to take down the Tyrannical Warmongerer known as Taylor Lannister (Swift).💰 He is the right heir to the throne of the Billboard Top 100. If you would like to support The One True King👑, 🎵🐐please give his Spotify a listen, or see Bruce's Goose's below about joining the Pee Warriors. 📋 See → #ShenrundayService🐉🟠⛪️ for edit posting schedule. See Pinned Post for "Pee Universe Explained by Pee"📌📁 👈 In the Pee Universe, #DBZ never peaked, it's still going strong in 2026 too!🏁 I'm just a fan like you are. 🫵 (🚫NO AFFILIATIONS🚫) 🛑I posted this on Wednesday night originally under BETTER AUDIO SYNC THAN ORIGINAL US BROADCAST and I had cut close to 3/4 a second of audio. It matched on my pc, but no other device that I tried. This was actually due to the fact I started using a bluetooth speaker within the past week. I have since corrected the issue, and no other false claims about being better than the US broadcast exist. I'll leave that for your interpretation.💯 I wanted to get this back up asap too for anybody who planned on watching it again. This is the DragonBall Z we grew up with.✅

DragonBallPee

30,695 просмотров • 12 дней назад

🇮🇱🕺 The Dancing Israelis This tweet will just cover who ‘The Dancing Israelis’ were, so that all those unfamiliar with the topic can understand what people are talking about when they’re referenced. The 5 ‘dancing Israelis’ on 9/11 were: ⁃ Oded Ellner ⁃ Omer Marmari ⁃ Paul Kurzberg ⁃ Sivan Kurzberg ⁃ Yaron Shmuel The company these men worked for was called ‘Urban Moving Systems’ and they had a white van with the company’s name and logo on the side of it. These five men had been seen by witnesses setting up cameras aimed at the Twin Towers and were seen congratulating each other as the buildings were burning. These celebrations included: ⁃ Flicking a lighter as the WTC burned in the background. ⁃ High-fiving each other. ⁃ Hugging each other. ⁃ Laughing and posing for pictures with the burning buildings in the background This is how they got the name ‘The Dancing Israelis’. All 5 men were eventually pulled over and arrested by the police, after witnesses had reported their strange behaviour. All 5 men were Israelis. Upon their arrest, the police found traces of explosives inside their van and also a map with the World Trade Center highlighted and Liberty State Park highlighted (this was where their van was parked and where they were watching the burning WTC from). A large amount of cash, multiple passports and plane tickets for various different destinations were also found in the van. Also upon their arrest, the driver, Sivan Kurzberg, said unprompted to one of the officers: “We are Israeli, We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are the problem.” Hmm… what an odd thing to say unprompted. Remember I said the men worked for a company called ‘Urban Moving Systems'? Well after the men were arrested, the FBI searched the offices of UMS and questioned its owner, Dominik Suter. As well as questioning him, the FBI took every computer from the office in order to be searched. NONE of the findings from the computers have been released publicly. This is odd as after being questioned, Suter and his wife fled back to Israel before he was able to be questioned further. And in 2002, Suter's name appeared on the May 2002 FBI Suspect List, along with the 9/11 hijackers and other suspected extremists. The company ‘Urban Moving System’ also came up on the CIA-FBI database as a front company for the MOSSAD. Paul Kurzberg and Sivan Kurzberg came up on the CIA-FBI database as operatives for the MOSSAD. All 5 of the Dancing Israelis failed their polygraph tests and were eventually jailed. While the FBI was investigating them, higher ranking officials in the FBI decided to deport them for ‘Visa violations’ rather than investigating their true motives further. This angered many of the lower ranking officials in the FBI, but there was nothing they could do about it. Is'’t this whole situation strange? 5 men, all working for a company that was flagged by the CIA-FBI database as a MOSSAD front, 2 of them flagged as MOSSAD operatives, all 5 of them had prior knowledge of 9/11, yet they were deported for visa violations? Involvement in the worst terrorist attack the United States has ever seen, and their punishment? Deportation back to Israel? That's it? Yeah. That's it. Only Israel could get away with this. And that’s because Israel runs the US government.
1:56

🇮🇱🕺 The Dancing Israelis This tweet will just cover who ‘The Dancing Israelis’ were, so that all those unfamiliar with the topic can understand what people are talking about when they’re referenced. The 5 ‘dancing Israelis’ on 9/11 were: ⁃ Oded Ellner ⁃ Omer Marmari ⁃ Paul Kurzberg ⁃ Sivan Kurzberg ⁃ Yaron Shmuel The company these men worked for was called ‘Urban Moving Systems’ and they had a white van with the company’s name and logo on the side of it. These five men had been seen by witnesses setting up cameras aimed at the Twin Towers and were seen congratulating each other as the buildings were burning. These celebrations included: ⁃ Flicking a lighter as the WTC burned in the background. ⁃ High-fiving each other. ⁃ Hugging each other. ⁃ Laughing and posing for pictures with the burning buildings in the background This is how they got the name ‘The Dancing Israelis’. All 5 men were eventually pulled over and arrested by the police, after witnesses had reported their strange behaviour. All 5 men were Israelis. Upon their arrest, the police found traces of explosives inside their van and also a map with the World Trade Center highlighted and Liberty State Park highlighted (this was where their van was parked and where they were watching the burning WTC from). A large amount of cash, multiple passports and plane tickets for various different destinations were also found in the van. Also upon their arrest, the driver, Sivan Kurzberg, said unprompted to one of the officers: “We are Israeli, We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are the problem.” Hmm… what an odd thing to say unprompted. Remember I said the men worked for a company called ‘Urban Moving Systems'? Well after the men were arrested, the FBI searched the offices of UMS and questioned its owner, Dominik Suter. As well as questioning him, the FBI took every computer from the office in order to be searched. NONE of the findings from the computers have been released publicly. This is odd as after being questioned, Suter and his wife fled back to Israel before he was able to be questioned further. And in 2002, Suter's name appeared on the May 2002 FBI Suspect List, along with the 9/11 hijackers and other suspected extremists. The company ‘Urban Moving System’ also came up on the CIA-FBI database as a front company for the MOSSAD. Paul Kurzberg and Sivan Kurzberg came up on the CIA-FBI database as operatives for the MOSSAD. All 5 of the Dancing Israelis failed their polygraph tests and were eventually jailed. While the FBI was investigating them, higher ranking officials in the FBI decided to deport them for ‘Visa violations’ rather than investigating their true motives further. This angered many of the lower ranking officials in the FBI, but there was nothing they could do about it. Is'’t this whole situation strange? 5 men, all working for a company that was flagged by the CIA-FBI database as a MOSSAD front, 2 of them flagged as MOSSAD operatives, all 5 of them had prior knowledge of 9/11, yet they were deported for visa violations? Involvement in the worst terrorist attack the United States has ever seen, and their punishment? Deportation back to Israel? That's it? Yeah. That's it. Only Israel could get away with this. And that’s because Israel runs the US government.

Censored Men

666,938 просмотров • 2 лет назад

INEC Chairman is trending because Amupitan said if ADC wins in 2027, they will be disqualified and the runner up will be declared winner; drawing NADECO and Abacha comparison from Peter Obi [Explained] Timeline: 2022: Nafiu Bala becomes ADC deputy chairman to Ralph Nwosu. July 2 2025: Coalition adopt ADC, Ralph Nwosu and NWC leaders resigned handing over to David Mark, Rauf Aregbesola. July 30 2025: Nafiu Bala announce self as Interim National Party Chairman. July 31: ADC David Mark faction released Bala’s signed resignation dated May 18. August 1: Bala denied, said it was forged. And on July 2 Ralph Nwosu left him incharge until next convention. 27 August: Bala declares himself Party Chairman following the resignation of Ralph Nwosu and all Exco’s — Based on party laws; the leadership falls to the deputy chairman, him. David Mark Faction replied with CTC showing INEC already acknowledged his resignation and Mark as party Chairman, since August 12. 2 September: Bala files an ex parte to restrain Mark’s factions from parading as leaders and a subsequent motion barring them from holding meeting, congress or convention pending court ruling. — Granted. 4 September: Court directs INEC and David Mark be notified of the motions. 18 December: David Mark file an appeal challenging Federal High Court’s jurisdiction to handle the party leadership matter. 12 March 2026: Court of Appeal rejects the appeal, upholds Nafiu Bala’s motions and directs the High Court to expedite judgement as election is near. While granting the Bala’s motions compels INEC to temporarily disrecognize both factions, block both factions from events and retain status quo ante bellum, not just status quo, pending high court decision. Meaning, everything should go back to how it was before September 2 when chaos and court case started. April 1: INEC delisted African Democratic Congress, as ordered by court of appeal. April 2: ADC accuse Tinubu of destabilizing democracy by using state tools to remove disenfranchise opposition, demanded Amupitan’s resignation for interpreting court judgement with bias, vows to continue with Congress and convention scheduled for April 9. Today April 3: INEC chairman Amupitan denies working for Tinubu, says they’re only obeying direct court instructions, and if ADC proceeds with events and eventually wins, they’d be disqualified like it happened in Zamfara. He advised them to go to court which will be quick, since Court of Appeal already directed a swift proceeding. Reaction: patriotic Nigerians say they now understand INEC, others insist it is a plot for one-party state. Femi Falana, Gani Adams suggest the courts are being manipulated to set up a one-party state. See opinions from Peter Obi, Keyamo and others in screenshots. Follow Trending Explained for daily explanations, Ad, PR.
9:49

INEC Chairman is trending because Amupitan said if ADC wins in 2027, they will be disqualified and the runner up will be declared winner; drawing NADECO and Abacha comparison from Peter Obi [Explained] Timeline: 2022: Nafiu Bala becomes ADC deputy chairman to Ralph Nwosu. July 2 2025: Coalition adopt ADC, Ralph Nwosu and NWC leaders resigned handing over to David Mark, Rauf Aregbesola. July 30 2025: Nafiu Bala announce self as Interim National Party Chairman. July 31: ADC David Mark faction released Bala’s signed resignation dated May 18. August 1: Bala denied, said it was forged. And on July 2 Ralph Nwosu left him incharge until next convention. 27 August: Bala declares himself Party Chairman following the resignation of Ralph Nwosu and all Exco’s — Based on party laws; the leadership falls to the deputy chairman, him. David Mark Faction replied with CTC showing INEC already acknowledged his resignation and Mark as party Chairman, since August 12. 2 September: Bala files an ex parte to restrain Mark’s factions from parading as leaders and a subsequent motion barring them from holding meeting, congress or convention pending court ruling. — Granted. 4 September: Court directs INEC and David Mark be notified of the motions. 18 December: David Mark file an appeal challenging Federal High Court’s jurisdiction to handle the party leadership matter. 12 March 2026: Court of Appeal rejects the appeal, upholds Nafiu Bala’s motions and directs the High Court to expedite judgement as election is near. While granting the Bala’s motions compels INEC to temporarily disrecognize both factions, block both factions from events and retain status quo ante bellum, not just status quo, pending high court decision. Meaning, everything should go back to how it was before September 2 when chaos and court case started. April 1: INEC delisted African Democratic Congress, as ordered by court of appeal. April 2: ADC accuse Tinubu of destabilizing democracy by using state tools to remove disenfranchise opposition, demanded Amupitan’s resignation for interpreting court judgement with bias, vows to continue with Congress and convention scheduled for April 9. Today April 3: INEC chairman Amupitan denies working for Tinubu, says they’re only obeying direct court instructions, and if ADC proceeds with events and eventually wins, they’d be disqualified like it happened in Zamfara. He advised them to go to court which will be quick, since Court of Appeal already directed a swift proceeding. Reaction: patriotic Nigerians say they now understand INEC, others insist it is a plot for one-party state. Femi Falana, Gani Adams suggest the courts are being manipulated to set up a one-party state. See opinions from Peter Obi, Keyamo and others in screenshots. Follow Trending Explained for daily explanations, Ad, PR.

Trending Explained

41,378 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

HORRIFYING‼️ Our Food Is About To Be Poisoned With NEW “Transgenic Edible Vaccines” 💉☣️ They’re Being Funded Right Now BY TAXPAYERS, mRNA Food Vaccine FACTORIES 🚨 “The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Kentucky. Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of my amendment, which states that none of the funds made available by this act may be used to fund any grant related to any transgenic edible vaccine. Does the term transgenic edible vaccine sound far-fetched? Well, it's not. We're funding it. In fact, scientists from the University of California, Riverside, funded with your taxpayer dollars, have been studying whether they can turn edible plants such as lettuce and spinach into mRNA vaccine factories, thereby creating a transgenic edible vaccine. One associate professor at UCR explained that, ideally a single plant would produce enough mRNA to vaccinate a single person. We are testing this approach with spinach and lettuce and have long-term goals of people growing it in their own gardens. Farmers could also eventually grow entire fields of it. I don't think this is a good idea. I don't think the American people should be funding this. And I think, and I would hope, that we've learned something from the COVID experience with SARS-CoV-2, that some of our science projects aren't the best ideas. And with that, I reserve. Gentlemen from Kentucky is recognized. My colleague on the other side of the aisle talks about keeping prices low. I think there's more to it than that for the American people. He also speaks as if these vaccines, these transgenic edible plant vaccines, are only used for livestock. Well, in fact, they have been used for livestock. I'll get to that in a second. But they're also being used for people. That is the intended outcome of many of these programs that we are funding, funding with money from the USDA. What could possibly go wrong with this research? Well, we found out a few years ago when a biotech company was experimenting growing in corn a vaccine to keep pigs from getting diarrhea. What happened? Well, the next year where the corn was grown, the prior year the corn came up, and it got co-mingled with soybeans that were being grown there. It contaminated 500 bushels of soybeans, which were then co-mingled with 500,000 bushels of soybeans. And those all had to be recalled and destroyed. Luckily, they caught it. Do we want humans eating vaccines that were grown in corn meant to stop pigs from getting diarrhea? I don't think we want that to happen. Yet that almost happened, and it could happen. There's another case where the pollen cross-contaminated another crop of corn, and 155 acres of corn had to be burned. What are the cases where we're not discovering this? I think it's dangerous to play God with our food. I think we need a safe food supply. And this is about food safety. Ultimately, the people in this country need to know what's in their food. And if we start contaminating the DNA of our food with DNA from other animals or viruses, the pollen could spread, and we don't know what could happen. And I would hope we've learned a lesson from the Wuhan lab that sometimes things escape sometimes things don't go as you plan and so that's why i think it's a bad idea to fund transgenic edible plant vaccine research from the u.s. day i urge adoption of my amendment and i yield back the balance of my time the question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from kentucky those in favor say aye those opposed say no in the opinion of the chair the ayes have it the amendment is agreed to”
3:53

HORRIFYING‼️ Our Food Is About To Be Poisoned With NEW “Transgenic Edible Vaccines” 💉☣️ They’re Being Funded Right Now BY TAXPAYERS, mRNA Food Vaccine FACTORIES 🚨 “The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Kentucky. Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of my amendment, which states that none of the funds made available by this act may be used to fund any grant related to any transgenic edible vaccine. Does the term transgenic edible vaccine sound far-fetched? Well, it's not. We're funding it. In fact, scientists from the University of California, Riverside, funded with your taxpayer dollars, have been studying whether they can turn edible plants such as lettuce and spinach into mRNA vaccine factories, thereby creating a transgenic edible vaccine. One associate professor at UCR explained that, ideally a single plant would produce enough mRNA to vaccinate a single person. We are testing this approach with spinach and lettuce and have long-term goals of people growing it in their own gardens. Farmers could also eventually grow entire fields of it. I don't think this is a good idea. I don't think the American people should be funding this. And I think, and I would hope, that we've learned something from the COVID experience with SARS-CoV-2, that some of our science projects aren't the best ideas. And with that, I reserve. Gentlemen from Kentucky is recognized. My colleague on the other side of the aisle talks about keeping prices low. I think there's more to it than that for the American people. He also speaks as if these vaccines, these transgenic edible plant vaccines, are only used for livestock. Well, in fact, they have been used for livestock. I'll get to that in a second. But they're also being used for people. That is the intended outcome of many of these programs that we are funding, funding with money from the USDA. What could possibly go wrong with this research? Well, we found out a few years ago when a biotech company was experimenting growing in corn a vaccine to keep pigs from getting diarrhea. What happened? Well, the next year where the corn was grown, the prior year the corn came up, and it got co-mingled with soybeans that were being grown there. It contaminated 500 bushels of soybeans, which were then co-mingled with 500,000 bushels of soybeans. And those all had to be recalled and destroyed. Luckily, they caught it. Do we want humans eating vaccines that were grown in corn meant to stop pigs from getting diarrhea? I don't think we want that to happen. Yet that almost happened, and it could happen. There's another case where the pollen cross-contaminated another crop of corn, and 155 acres of corn had to be burned. What are the cases where we're not discovering this? I think it's dangerous to play God with our food. I think we need a safe food supply. And this is about food safety. Ultimately, the people in this country need to know what's in their food. And if we start contaminating the DNA of our food with DNA from other animals or viruses, the pollen could spread, and we don't know what could happen. And I would hope we've learned a lesson from the Wuhan lab that sometimes things escape sometimes things don't go as you plan and so that's why i think it's a bad idea to fund transgenic edible plant vaccine research from the u.s. day i urge adoption of my amendment and i yield back the balance of my time the question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from kentucky those in favor say aye those opposed say no in the opinion of the chair the ayes have it the amendment is agreed to”

Wall Street Apes

494,708 просмотров • 2 лет назад

PETER OBI MUST APOLOGISE TO AIRPORT STAFF AND PAY THE FINE FOR WRONG PARKING As the Minister of Aviation, I felt a moral duty to investigate and authenticate the claim made by opposition candidate, Mr. Peter Obi, a few days ago that the tyres of his car were ‘unjustly’ clamped at the airport, suggesting a ‘persecution agenda’ against him by the Federal Government. Politics aside, every Nigerian is entitled to fair treatment under the law. I therefore instituted an internal inquiry over the issue. Luckily enough, the entire Abuja airport is covered by CCTV cameras, real-time, 24/7. But apparently, this fact was unknown to Mr. Peter Obi. Otherwise, perhaps he would have been more circumspect before rushing to the media to cry ‘persecution’. From the recordings, these are the facts: 1. On Saturday, July 4th, 2026, Mr. Obi arrived at the domestic wing of the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport Abuja at exactly 20:28 pm, driven by a Policeman. He alighted with two other occupants and went into the terminal building. 2. The Police driver then parked the vehicle, almost blocking the entrance and came out himself and went into the terminal building too. The airport rule is that, apart from the fact that it is a drop-off zone, a driver must remain behind the wheels of the vehicle for it to be tolerated for some time within that zone. Still the vehicle tyres were not clamped. 3. The Policeman came back to the vehicle at about 20:32pm and collected something from the vehicle and went back into the building again, leaving the vehicle unattended to. 4. At this point, the dutiful airport security staff came over and clamped the tyres of the car. In doing this, contrary to the claims by Peter Obi, nobody was inside the car and so nobody knew whether it was his car (not that it should matter, anyway). 5. When the Policeman returned again and discovered the tyres were clamped, he was directed to an office and upon getting there, he called Mr. Peter Obi on his phone and gave the phone to the manager. Mr. Peter Obi then introduced himself and spoke with the manager, peddled his ‘influence’ and requested for the release of the vehicle. His vehicle was then released without him paying the necessary fine. 6. It is important to note that the time the vehicle was parked unattended to in that prohibited zone was about 30 minutes, which constitutes a security risk at an airport by global best practices. What has emerged from this is a clear case of an opposition candidate trying to whip up unnecessary sentiments for a wrong he committed with his driver. The excuse which Mr. Peter Obi gave that there were other offenders too on that day (which is completely false) cannot be an excuse for an individual aspiring to be President of Nigeria. He must live above board. This is a matter that was not even mentioned at all by the airport authorities and had been put to rest. But ever determined to milk any situation to score cheap political points, Mr. Peter Obi decided to go on air to render a false narrative. Therefore, he must also face the consequences of his actions. (I have attached the CCTV footages to this statement for the public to clearly see what transpired.) In the circumstances, consistent with the principle of equality before the law, as Minister of Aviation, I make the following demands on Mr. Peter Obi: 1. That he tenders an unreserved, public apology to those hardworking, ordinary Nigerian workers at the airport, just doing their jobs dutifully and whom he sought to blackmail as his ‘persecutors’. 2. That Mr. Peter Obi voluntarily goes back to the airport and pay the appropriate fine of N25,000 for wrongful parking at the airport for which he used ‘influence peddling’ to bully his way out on that day. He cannot be bigger than the law. If these demands are not met within one week, I will be giving the necessary directives to the Federal Airport Authority of Nigeria (FAAN) to take the next steps against him.
6:21

PETER OBI MUST APOLOGISE TO AIRPORT STAFF AND PAY THE FINE FOR WRONG PARKING As the Minister of Aviation, I felt a moral duty to investigate and authenticate the claim made by opposition candidate, Mr. Peter Obi, a few days ago that the tyres of his car were ‘unjustly’ clamped at the airport, suggesting a ‘persecution agenda’ against him by the Federal Government. Politics aside, every Nigerian is entitled to fair treatment under the law. I therefore instituted an internal inquiry over the issue. Luckily enough, the entire Abuja airport is covered by CCTV cameras, real-time, 24/7. But apparently, this fact was unknown to Mr. Peter Obi. Otherwise, perhaps he would have been more circumspect before rushing to the media to cry ‘persecution’. From the recordings, these are the facts: 1. On Saturday, July 4th, 2026, Mr. Obi arrived at the domestic wing of the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport Abuja at exactly 20:28 pm, driven by a Policeman. He alighted with two other occupants and went into the terminal building. 2. The Police driver then parked the vehicle, almost blocking the entrance and came out himself and went into the terminal building too. The airport rule is that, apart from the fact that it is a drop-off zone, a driver must remain behind the wheels of the vehicle for it to be tolerated for some time within that zone. Still the vehicle tyres were not clamped. 3. The Policeman came back to the vehicle at about 20:32pm and collected something from the vehicle and went back into the building again, leaving the vehicle unattended to. 4. At this point, the dutiful airport security staff came over and clamped the tyres of the car. In doing this, contrary to the claims by Peter Obi, nobody was inside the car and so nobody knew whether it was his car (not that it should matter, anyway). 5. When the Policeman returned again and discovered the tyres were clamped, he was directed to an office and upon getting there, he called Mr. Peter Obi on his phone and gave the phone to the manager. Mr. Peter Obi then introduced himself and spoke with the manager, peddled his ‘influence’ and requested for the release of the vehicle. His vehicle was then released without him paying the necessary fine. 6. It is important to note that the time the vehicle was parked unattended to in that prohibited zone was about 30 minutes, which constitutes a security risk at an airport by global best practices. What has emerged from this is a clear case of an opposition candidate trying to whip up unnecessary sentiments for a wrong he committed with his driver. The excuse which Mr. Peter Obi gave that there were other offenders too on that day (which is completely false) cannot be an excuse for an individual aspiring to be President of Nigeria. He must live above board. This is a matter that was not even mentioned at all by the airport authorities and had been put to rest. But ever determined to milk any situation to score cheap political points, Mr. Peter Obi decided to go on air to render a false narrative. Therefore, he must also face the consequences of his actions. (I have attached the CCTV footages to this statement for the public to clearly see what transpired.) In the circumstances, consistent with the principle of equality before the law, as Minister of Aviation, I make the following demands on Mr. Peter Obi: 1. That he tenders an unreserved, public apology to those hardworking, ordinary Nigerian workers at the airport, just doing their jobs dutifully and whom he sought to blackmail as his ‘persecutors’. 2. That Mr. Peter Obi voluntarily goes back to the airport and pay the appropriate fine of N25,000 for wrongful parking at the airport for which he used ‘influence peddling’ to bully his way out on that day. He cannot be bigger than the law. If these demands are not met within one week, I will be giving the necessary directives to the Federal Airport Authority of Nigeria (FAAN) to take the next steps against him.

Festus Keyamo, SAN, CON, FCIArb (UK)

2,734,741 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

I say this with all due respect and out of love. Black America is embarrassing. As a Black man I am truly embarrassed for us. Anybody following the Democrats is ridiculous but what do we get out of it? I watched Black people march around this country and say "the whole system" is guilty, only to vote for a blond haired White woman who used to work for the CIA over a Black woman because she is a Republican. We have lost the plot... No, even worse, we are the plot. It's not about voting for a White person or Black person based on their race, it's about the logical inconsistency of what we think the "guilty system" really is and how selective we are with our definitions and standards. I say this in all seriousness, Black people make so many excuses "culturally" it's almost unbelievable. We talk about "culture" and celebrate "culture", if a Black person does something good or has success, we hold them up as an example of "Black excellence". Great, but if a Black person doesn't something violent or self-destructive we blame White people or racism. If somebody achieves "Black excellence", the 1st thing they usually do is move away from other Black people, go to where White people live, but then we say there is no problem in the Black community? Are we retarded? And I don't say that to be funny. I honestly see the stuff we post online, the content we consume, the comments we make, what has our attention as Black consumers and think to myself are we retarded? Even woke is like this genre of social media activity that tries to engage in intellectual dialogue but it's so heavily wrapped in "white supremacy this, white supremacy that". Here's the strangest part... Sports is one of the few places Black people have been dominant categorically, yet none of our "culture" is a reflection of what it takes to become a great athlete. Imagine a basketball player loses their man in a basketball game, the coach calls a timeout and in the huddle the player says "but other people lose their man, I watched other games where players lose their man, the refs don't want us to win." Any good coach would say "shut the hell up and guard your man or come out of the game", if they don't lull you out for the response alone. Now imagine if everybody did that? That's what Black America has become. One big excuses and a sorry excuse at that. No amount of Obamafication can liberal wash the reality of Black America. We've essentially destroyed our standard of education and stunted our intellectual growth by hitching our wagon to a political philosophy, political agenda, political party that isn't even rooted in reality. Non-binary?You niggas should be ashamed of yourselves honestly. One thing I won't do is allow my legacy to be going along with this nonsense because it was convenient and trendy or socially accepted. I'd rather go the Malcolm X route, where 40-50 years later the things I say will still be so true people try to ignore it rather than face it. Black America is being used to destroy America, we need to start being honest so we can help save it. Royce White for U.S. Senate MN 2026 America 1st, End The Woke!
3:42

I say this with all due respect and out of love. Black America is embarrassing. As a Black man I am truly embarrassed for us. Anybody following the Democrats is ridiculous but what do we get out of it? I watched Black people march around this country and say "the whole system" is guilty, only to vote for a blond haired White woman who used to work for the CIA over a Black woman because she is a Republican. We have lost the plot... No, even worse, we are the plot. It's not about voting for a White person or Black person based on their race, it's about the logical inconsistency of what we think the "guilty system" really is and how selective we are with our definitions and standards. I say this in all seriousness, Black people make so many excuses "culturally" it's almost unbelievable. We talk about "culture" and celebrate "culture", if a Black person does something good or has success, we hold them up as an example of "Black excellence". Great, but if a Black person doesn't something violent or self-destructive we blame White people or racism. If somebody achieves "Black excellence", the 1st thing they usually do is move away from other Black people, go to where White people live, but then we say there is no problem in the Black community? Are we retarded? And I don't say that to be funny. I honestly see the stuff we post online, the content we consume, the comments we make, what has our attention as Black consumers and think to myself are we retarded? Even woke is like this genre of social media activity that tries to engage in intellectual dialogue but it's so heavily wrapped in "white supremacy this, white supremacy that". Here's the strangest part... Sports is one of the few places Black people have been dominant categorically, yet none of our "culture" is a reflection of what it takes to become a great athlete. Imagine a basketball player loses their man in a basketball game, the coach calls a timeout and in the huddle the player says "but other people lose their man, I watched other games where players lose their man, the refs don't want us to win." Any good coach would say "shut the hell up and guard your man or come out of the game", if they don't lull you out for the response alone. Now imagine if everybody did that? That's what Black America has become. One big excuses and a sorry excuse at that. No amount of Obamafication can liberal wash the reality of Black America. We've essentially destroyed our standard of education and stunted our intellectual growth by hitching our wagon to a political philosophy, political agenda, political party that isn't even rooted in reality. Non-binary?You niggas should be ashamed of yourselves honestly. One thing I won't do is allow my legacy to be going along with this nonsense because it was convenient and trendy or socially accepted. I'd rather go the Malcolm X route, where 40-50 years later the things I say will still be so true people try to ignore it rather than face it. Black America is being used to destroy America, we need to start being honest so we can help save it. Royce White for U.S. Senate MN 2026 America 1st, End The Woke!

Royce White 🇺🇸

122,189 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Jeremy Corbell (Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell ) is either lying or delusional - or both. And what I'm laying out below should make it impossible for even the lowest of critical thinkers to pretend otherwise. The clip below is blowing up on X right now - it's where Corbell threatens more "file systems" if the government doesn't deliver reverse engineering and biologics in the next UAP drop - it's not some fresh bombshell. This is just a short exceprt from his June 4, 2026 appearance on Mystery Wire podcast with the other grifter, George Knapp and Ron Futrell - talking about his own documentary (as if he ever talks about anything other than himself). In that segment (between around 11:38 and 13:53) Corbell progressively loses his frigging marbles in real time: - "Hundreds of journalists around the world have" the information shown in Sleeping Dog. - The government needs to release details on reverse engineering of non-human craft and biologics. - David Grush "told the truth" under oath - including that we have been reverse-engineering for decades and recovered "pilot biologics" and "non-human intelligent beings" - Parts of the U.S. Government (and even the Five Eyes alliance) already have this information but basically decided to stay silent. - The President should just order the release and hold the CIA accountable. Corbell is framing all of this like he and Knapp are sitting on proof that already escaped their hands and is now with HUNDREDS of journalists across the globe. (Cough - bullshit) So, where is that list of hundreds of journalists - you know - people who stab each other in the back to be the first to a story - how come none of them have said jack or shit? Where are the documents with classification markings? Where is the chain of custody? Where is ONE SINGLE JOURNALIST STEPPING FORWARD WITH AN AUTHENTICATED LIST? Nothing - Zero - Zilch - This is GRIFTING 101- Inventing a secret army of people who supposedly back you up so you never have to produce the actual evidence yourself. If Cornbell actually had real, active, highly classified U.S. Government file systems providing reverse-engineered non-human craft and biologics, several things would have ALREADY happened. 1) The MOMENT that material left authorized channels, alarm bells would ring under Executive Order 13526 and the classification rules. Compromise reporting is MANDATORY. Investigations are AUTOMATIC!!! 2) People who actually leak this kind of material get HAMMERED - Examples: -Reality Winner: 63 months in prison for mailing ONE classified document. - Daniel Hale: 45 months for disclosing classified information to a reporter. - Jack Teixeira: 15 years for sharing classified pages online. -Chelsea Manning: 35 years for massive leaks. -Edward Snowen: Charged under the Espionage Act and living in exile. Julian Assange: Charged under the Espionage Act for allegedly conspiring ot obtain and disclose classified national defense information. YOU DO NOT GET TO KEEP THE FILES - YOU DO NOT GET TO MAKE A DOCUMENTARY ABOUT THEM - YOU DO NOT GET TO GO ON PODCASTS THREATENING TO RELEASE MORE AND WALK AROUND FREE. The system does not work that way. The fact that NONE of this has happened to Corbell is 100% proof that he DOES NOT HAVE WHAT HE CLAIMS. Leaking real classified material does not magically make it public domain. The rules are deliberately strict precisely so random ass-hat filmmakers cannot just wave "file systems" around on camera and pretend it's disclosure. You are BEING LIED TO, and Corbell is using the same cheap rhetorical tricks EVERY TIME: - Starts with something true or partly true ("some UAP cases are still explained" or "the government has released some files"). - Immediately swaps it for the much bigger, unproven claim ("therefore the government has alien craft and bodies, and I've seen the proof."). - Uses David Grusch's testimony as a trump card ("he told the truth") while ignoring that AARO investigated those exact claims and found no supporting evidence. -Hides behind secrecy ("the government is slow-walking it") instead of producing one single authenticated document with provenance. A middle schooler could spot the shell game once it's laid out clearly. Bottom Line: - Corbell is either: 1) Deliberately lying about possessing and distributing classified proof of non-human craft and biologics, or 2) So deep in his own self-created mythology that he genuinely believes his own unverified claims as established fact. Either way, he's grifting. He makes money from Sleeping Dog documentary, podcast appearances, and the endless "disclosure is coming but the government won't show the real stuff" bullshit. Zero authenticated documents. Zero chain of custody. Zero technical validation. Zero corroboration for the "hundreds of journalists" claim. The lowest critical thinker can understand this now. If you don't - Well, I can explain it to you again, but I can't understand it for you.
2:25

Jeremy Corbell (Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell ) is either lying or delusional - or both. And what I'm laying out below should make it impossible for even the lowest of critical thinkers to pretend otherwise. The clip below is blowing up on X right now - it's where Corbell threatens more "file systems" if the government doesn't deliver reverse engineering and biologics in the next UAP drop - it's not some fresh bombshell. This is just a short exceprt from his June 4, 2026 appearance on Mystery Wire podcast with the other grifter, George Knapp and Ron Futrell - talking about his own documentary (as if he ever talks about anything other than himself). In that segment (between around 11:38 and 13:53) Corbell progressively loses his frigging marbles in real time: - "Hundreds of journalists around the world have" the information shown in Sleeping Dog. - The government needs to release details on reverse engineering of non-human craft and biologics. - David Grush "told the truth" under oath - including that we have been reverse-engineering for decades and recovered "pilot biologics" and "non-human intelligent beings" - Parts of the U.S. Government (and even the Five Eyes alliance) already have this information but basically decided to stay silent. - The President should just order the release and hold the CIA accountable. Corbell is framing all of this like he and Knapp are sitting on proof that already escaped their hands and is now with HUNDREDS of journalists across the globe. (Cough - bullshit) So, where is that list of hundreds of journalists - you know - people who stab each other in the back to be the first to a story - how come none of them have said jack or shit? Where are the documents with classification markings? Where is the chain of custody? Where is ONE SINGLE JOURNALIST STEPPING FORWARD WITH AN AUTHENTICATED LIST? Nothing - Zero - Zilch - This is GRIFTING 101- Inventing a secret army of people who supposedly back you up so you never have to produce the actual evidence yourself. If Cornbell actually had real, active, highly classified U.S. Government file systems providing reverse-engineered non-human craft and biologics, several things would have ALREADY happened. 1) The MOMENT that material left authorized channels, alarm bells would ring under Executive Order 13526 and the classification rules. Compromise reporting is MANDATORY. Investigations are AUTOMATIC!!! 2) People who actually leak this kind of material get HAMMERED - Examples: -Reality Winner: 63 months in prison for mailing ONE classified document. - Daniel Hale: 45 months for disclosing classified information to a reporter. - Jack Teixeira: 15 years for sharing classified pages online. -Chelsea Manning: 35 years for massive leaks. -Edward Snowen: Charged under the Espionage Act and living in exile. Julian Assange: Charged under the Espionage Act for allegedly conspiring ot obtain and disclose classified national defense information. YOU DO NOT GET TO KEEP THE FILES - YOU DO NOT GET TO MAKE A DOCUMENTARY ABOUT THEM - YOU DO NOT GET TO GO ON PODCASTS THREATENING TO RELEASE MORE AND WALK AROUND FREE. The system does not work that way. The fact that NONE of this has happened to Corbell is 100% proof that he DOES NOT HAVE WHAT HE CLAIMS. Leaking real classified material does not magically make it public domain. The rules are deliberately strict precisely so random ass-hat filmmakers cannot just wave "file systems" around on camera and pretend it's disclosure. You are BEING LIED TO, and Corbell is using the same cheap rhetorical tricks EVERY TIME: - Starts with something true or partly true ("some UAP cases are still explained" or "the government has released some files"). - Immediately swaps it for the much bigger, unproven claim ("therefore the government has alien craft and bodies, and I've seen the proof."). - Uses David Grusch's testimony as a trump card ("he told the truth") while ignoring that AARO investigated those exact claims and found no supporting evidence. -Hides behind secrecy ("the government is slow-walking it") instead of producing one single authenticated document with provenance. A middle schooler could spot the shell game once it's laid out clearly. Bottom Line: - Corbell is either: 1) Deliberately lying about possessing and distributing classified proof of non-human craft and biologics, or 2) So deep in his own self-created mythology that he genuinely believes his own unverified claims as established fact. Either way, he's grifting. He makes money from Sleeping Dog documentary, podcast appearances, and the endless "disclosure is coming but the government won't show the real stuff" bullshit. Zero authenticated documents. Zero chain of custody. Zero technical validation. Zero corroboration for the "hundreds of journalists" claim. The lowest critical thinker can understand this now. If you don't - Well, I can explain it to you again, but I can't understand it for you.

DesertThrottleDiaries

20,627 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

So here’s the story you’re not supposed to notice. Blake Neff (Blake Neff) is a producer and frequent co-host on the Charlie Kirk Show. In recent weeks he’s been using that platform to attack Candace Owens — accusing her of profiteering off Charlie Kirk’s death, of narcissism, and of trying to humiliate Erika Kirk by talking about dates and women from Charlie’s past. That’s the same Blake Neff who, according to CNN’s July 2020 investigation, spent years posting on the unmoderated forum AutoAdmit under the name CharlesXII. He didn’t just throw out random edgy comments. He started and kept alive a multi-year thread targeting a real Asian woman — a woman he actually knew personally through Facebook. He called her an “Azn megashrew,” posted her private dating updates and life details, and invited years of forum pile-ons. That’s not anonymous trolling of strangers. That’s sustained, personal targeting of someone he knew. He was fired from Tucker Carlson Tonight over the broader pattern of racist and sexist posts. There was no public apology, no real reckoning. Other examples from the same record include comments like “Black doods staying inside playing Call of Duty is probably one of the biggest factors keeping crime down” and, in February 2020, calling Mormonism “an inherently cucky religion.” Years later he told The New Yorker he considered himself “the least racist person on AutoAdmit” and claimed he “never posted the N-word.” Despite that documented history, Neff was elevated at TPUSA. He is now on the Charlie Kirk Show using the platform to go after Candace Owens — a Black conservative woman who has been pressing the organization on transparency and accountability around Charlie’s legacy. On May 29, 2026, Owens posted that sharing private letters from your dead husband for the express purpose of fundraising is “as tasteless as it is classless,” calling it “shameless emotional-manipulation for money.” Neff replied the same day. Here’s the actual post: “Nobody has profiteered more off of Charlie’s death than you have, Candace, and you share plenty of Charlie’s private communications with you. But there are a few important differences: 1. You were not Charlie’s wife. 2. Your messages tend to be from half a decade ago or more – I wonder why! 3. You love referring to dates he went on and women he knew prior to Erika. There is very clearly no reason to do this except trying to humiliate Erika, and you were doing even before you started accusing her of helping murder Charlie. 4. You do all of this to profit yourself. Yeah, Turning Point needs to raise money. It does that because it actually does things… All you have is the narcissism to think that what Charlie built should have been handed over to you for free.” The documented record shows a clear pattern: years of sustained personal targeting and derogatory commentary — including doxxing-style harassment of one specific woman of color’s private life — followed by professional rehabilitation with zero accountability, followed by the use of a major platform to target another prominent Black woman who is demanding receipts on leadership and legacy. If character and consistency actually matter, this is the story the primary sources tell. CNN, July 2020. Neff’s May 29, 2026 X post. Owens’ May 29, 2026 X post. The New Yorker, January 2026. That’s it. No spin required. The record is the record.
0:43

So here’s the story you’re not supposed to notice. Blake Neff (Blake Neff) is a producer and frequent co-host on the Charlie Kirk Show. In recent weeks he’s been using that platform to attack Candace Owens — accusing her of profiteering off Charlie Kirk’s death, of narcissism, and of trying to humiliate Erika Kirk by talking about dates and women from Charlie’s past. That’s the same Blake Neff who, according to CNN’s July 2020 investigation, spent years posting on the unmoderated forum AutoAdmit under the name CharlesXII. He didn’t just throw out random edgy comments. He started and kept alive a multi-year thread targeting a real Asian woman — a woman he actually knew personally through Facebook. He called her an “Azn megashrew,” posted her private dating updates and life details, and invited years of forum pile-ons. That’s not anonymous trolling of strangers. That’s sustained, personal targeting of someone he knew. He was fired from Tucker Carlson Tonight over the broader pattern of racist and sexist posts. There was no public apology, no real reckoning. Other examples from the same record include comments like “Black doods staying inside playing Call of Duty is probably one of the biggest factors keeping crime down” and, in February 2020, calling Mormonism “an inherently cucky religion.” Years later he told The New Yorker he considered himself “the least racist person on AutoAdmit” and claimed he “never posted the N-word.” Despite that documented history, Neff was elevated at TPUSA. He is now on the Charlie Kirk Show using the platform to go after Candace Owens — a Black conservative woman who has been pressing the organization on transparency and accountability around Charlie’s legacy. On May 29, 2026, Owens posted that sharing private letters from your dead husband for the express purpose of fundraising is “as tasteless as it is classless,” calling it “shameless emotional-manipulation for money.” Neff replied the same day. Here’s the actual post: “Nobody has profiteered more off of Charlie’s death than you have, Candace, and you share plenty of Charlie’s private communications with you. But there are a few important differences: 1. You were not Charlie’s wife. 2. Your messages tend to be from half a decade ago or more – I wonder why! 3. You love referring to dates he went on and women he knew prior to Erika. There is very clearly no reason to do this except trying to humiliate Erika, and you were doing even before you started accusing her of helping murder Charlie. 4. You do all of this to profit yourself. Yeah, Turning Point needs to raise money. It does that because it actually does things… All you have is the narcissism to think that what Charlie built should have been handed over to you for free.” The documented record shows a clear pattern: years of sustained personal targeting and derogatory commentary — including doxxing-style harassment of one specific woman of color’s private life — followed by professional rehabilitation with zero accountability, followed by the use of a major platform to target another prominent Black woman who is demanding receipts on leadership and legacy. If character and consistency actually matter, this is the story the primary sources tell. CNN, July 2020. Neff’s May 29, 2026 X post. Owens’ May 29, 2026 X post. The New Yorker, January 2026. That’s it. No spin required. The record is the record.

Travis

88,419 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Strategy sold 3,588 BTC last week. That's 112x more than the 32 BTC they sold a few weeks ago (which freaked out the market). Here's what's happening and why they are doing this... 1. Last week = Strategy sold Last week, Strategy sold 3,588 BTC and used all of the proceeds ($216m) to fund dividend payments on their suite of preferred equities. Q2 dividend payments for STRF, STRK, STRD, and STRE... and June dividends for STRC. Notably, BTC price opened last week at $59.5k. Strategy sold 3,588 BTC over the course of the week, yet BTC price went up to $63.5k. 2. The bigger picture = Strategy is NET buying Strategy bought 85,296 BTC in Q2. Their combined selling for Q2 was 3,620 BTC (32 + 3,588). In other words, they bought 22.5x more BTC in Q2 than they sold. (For 2026 YTD numbers, Strategy has bought ~175k BTC and sold 3.6k BTC. That's a 48x ratio.) 3. The message in advance Weeks ago, Saylor explained what they are doing, in an interview with Michaël van de Poppe (see clip) "On occasion, we'll buy 20 Bitcoin & we'll sell 1 Bitcoin... Then the credit investors will give us enough to buy 20 more Bitcoin." Saylor further explained the strategic rationale of selling Bitcoin... "Our credit investors expect that we're going to support the credit dividend and pay it (and our asset is BTC)... 'will you sell some Bitcoin to pay us the money?' They expect me to say yes, because if I'm not going to pay the dividend, they're not going to buy the credit & the credit agency won't rate the credit." 4. What Strategy is doing Strategy is showing the market that they can and will sell BTC. They are doing this to gain access to more credit market capital... so that they can buy much more BTC. Saylor has recently asserted that it's important to "buy more Bitcoin than you sell." This is that in action. In Q2, they bought 85k BTC. They then used 3.5k BTC to fund the dividends on the Digital Credit that enabled them to buy 85k BTC. They bought 22.5 and sold 1. 5. What to expect next Saylor said they will "inoculate the market" by selling a little BTC. This is the second dose of inoculation. They will keep doing it until the market expects it and no longer reacts to it. They are not dumping their BTC treasury strategy for dollars. That is the click-bait headline for the uninformed. What they are telling you is that they plan to sell 1 BTC so they can buy 20 BTC. Over and over.
1:24

Strategy sold 3,588 BTC last week. That's 112x more than the 32 BTC they sold a few weeks ago (which freaked out the market). Here's what's happening and why they are doing this... 1. Last week = Strategy sold Last week, Strategy sold 3,588 BTC and used all of the proceeds ($216m) to fund dividend payments on their suite of preferred equities. Q2 dividend payments for STRF, STRK, STRD, and STRE... and June dividends for STRC. Notably, BTC price opened last week at $59.5k. Strategy sold 3,588 BTC over the course of the week, yet BTC price went up to $63.5k. 2. The bigger picture = Strategy is NET buying Strategy bought 85,296 BTC in Q2. Their combined selling for Q2 was 3,620 BTC (32 + 3,588). In other words, they bought 22.5x more BTC in Q2 than they sold. (For 2026 YTD numbers, Strategy has bought ~175k BTC and sold 3.6k BTC. That's a 48x ratio.) 3. The message in advance Weeks ago, Saylor explained what they are doing, in an interview with Michaël van de Poppe (see clip) "On occasion, we'll buy 20 Bitcoin & we'll sell 1 Bitcoin... Then the credit investors will give us enough to buy 20 more Bitcoin." Saylor further explained the strategic rationale of selling Bitcoin... "Our credit investors expect that we're going to support the credit dividend and pay it (and our asset is BTC)... 'will you sell some Bitcoin to pay us the money?' They expect me to say yes, because if I'm not going to pay the dividend, they're not going to buy the credit & the credit agency won't rate the credit." 4. What Strategy is doing Strategy is showing the market that they can and will sell BTC. They are doing this to gain access to more credit market capital... so that they can buy much more BTC. Saylor has recently asserted that it's important to "buy more Bitcoin than you sell." This is that in action. In Q2, they bought 85k BTC. They then used 3.5k BTC to fund the dividends on the Digital Credit that enabled them to buy 85k BTC. They bought 22.5 and sold 1. 5. What to expect next Saylor said they will "inoculate the market" by selling a little BTC. This is the second dose of inoculation. They will keep doing it until the market expects it and no longer reacts to it. They are not dumping their BTC treasury strategy for dollars. That is the click-bait headline for the uninformed. What they are telling you is that they plan to sell 1 BTC so they can buy 20 BTC. Over and over.

Jesse Myers

170,555 просмотров • 1 месяц назад