Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

The political rivalry between Rebecca Kadaga and Milly Babalanda has exploded into one of the most shocking public fallouts in recent memory. What began as a simmering power struggle has now turned into a dramatic exposé, leaving the nation stunned. In a stunning revelation, Kadaga openly declared that she...

10,560 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Mary Simon's Governor General of Canada appointment as Canada's Governor General has turned into a saga of controversy, excessive spending, and perceived political bias, casting a long shadow over what should have been a historic moment of representation for Indigenous peoples. From the moment she took office, her actions and expenditures have been scrutinized, revealing a pattern of what critics label as gross mismanagement and personal aggrandizement at the expense of public funds. The financial indiscretions are staggering. Simon's office has been accused of squandering taxpayer money on lavish in-flight meals costing $93,000 for trips to the Middle East, a sum that could have been better utilized for public welfare or critical infrastructure. Furthermore, the decision to spend $700,000 on a Book Fair and $71,000 on limousines paints a picture of an administration more concerned with pomp and circumstance than with fiscal responsibility. These expenses, rather than being justified, have become emblematic of a disconnect between the Governor General's office and the everyday struggles of Canadians, especially in times of economic hardship. The issue of language has also been weaponized against her. Simon's lack of proficiency in French, one of Canada's two official languages, has been seen not just as a cultural faux pas but as an affront to the linguistic heritage of a significant portion of the population. This has not only undermined her ability to connect with French-speaking Canadians but has also fueled perceptions of her as culturally insensitive and inadequately prepared for the role. Politically, her appointment by Justin Trudeau has been criticized as a move to cement Liberal influence within what should be an apolitical office. Her silence on crucial political matters, like the request from Pierre Poilievre to recall parliament for a confidence vote, suggests either a deliberate alignment with the Liberal agenda or a lack of understanding of her constitutional duties. This has led to accusations that she's merely a puppet for Trudeau's government, further eroding public trust in the office she holds. The accountability, or rather the stark lack thereof, from Simon's office has been a sore point. There's been no convincing response to the myriad criticisms, no transparency in how public funds are managed, and no public acknowledgment of the concerns raised by parliamentarians or the general populace. This opacity has fostered an environment where allegations of corruption, though not legally substantiated, thrive because of the absence of counter-narratives or explanations from her office. Her time is marked not by leadership but by controversy, with her every move scrutinized for signs of extravagance, political favoritism, and cultural insensitivity. Her silence on these issues does not exonerate her; it amplifies the narrative of a Governor General who is aloof, out of touch, and possibly corrupt in her handling of both public funds and her constitutional obligations. This has left a bitter taste, transforming what could have been a beacon of diversity and inclusion into a point of national contention and disappointment.

Vote Canada

55,976 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

It's sad how the Manicaland Provincial leadership succumbed to their greed inducing them to act against the party's constitution which states that the said position was reserved for a woman who should also be from the same Administrative District. I do not blame Tungwarara but the Manicaland leadership which has exposed its insatiable hunger for money. When did a man become a woman for them to make such a greedy blunder? The whole episode, which is a clear strategic blunder deriving from poor political astuteness, reveals the limitations of depending on money as a political weapon. One has to build a proper support base and entrench themselves within the structures through sincere philanthropy as has happened with Tagwirei who has years of work supporting the party behind him. His track record as a benefactor for the party has been testified about, such as by Hon Shamhu in the video, such that his entrance into party structures was a natural progression. No wonder even those who fought against his co-option into the Central Committee failed. After this Tungwarara should realize that as President Mnangagwa has said, ZANU PF cannot be put into one's pocket. There is a need for one to actually work and not seek shortcuts into power. As a political consultant I have assisted many successful individuals for years and I can tell you today that one has to identify their area of expertise where their potential can be realised. This monied and misguided belief that one has to get a party position is shallow. Like him or not Chivayo has identified his area and doesn't seek a political position. Connections and king-making influence is enough for him and that is a strategy. Equally, Scott Sakupwanya has targeted the Legislative route, successfully. Tagwirei has ignored that and instead sought for a position in the party structure. For one sincerely building support in the party donations can be done from behind the scenes and even through the Chairperson like Oppah Muchinguri or the President. That suffices unless there is a misguided and impulsive desire for power which compels one to continuously hog the limelight dishing gifts as a shortcut to power. However, that can misfire spectacularly if done without enough political wisdom.

Sabhuku Temba P. Mliswa

29,604 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

This appointment will be a defining moment of President Cyril Ramaphosa’s presidency. After years of State Capture and institutional collapse, South Africa does not need another cautious, bureaucratic choice at the National Prosecuting Authority. It needs credibility restored — in the justice system and in the eyes of the public. The recent interviews for National Director of Public Prosecutions made the contrast clear. Some candidates were evasive or uninspiring. One has already been ruled constitutionally unfit for office in the past. Another collapsed under scrutiny of her own CV. And after six years, the current leadership has produced no major State Capture convictions, despite overwhelming evidence. One candidate stood apart. Advocate Hermione Cronje was calm, precise, and intellectually dominant. She spoke honestly about constraints, clearly about strategy, and with deep understanding of complex financial crime. Media, civil society and legal observers converged around her performance for a simple reason: she knows how to prosecute corruption properly. Her commitment to justice began early. As a student, she was actively involved in campus politics and served as SRC President at UCT, the first black woman to do so — leadership forged in accountability and institutional responsibility. That grounding explains why she has never chased headlines or political favour. As Head of the Investigating Directorate, she was asked to build a State Capture prosecution unit from nothing inside a damaged NPA. She rebuilt capacity, restored international cooperation, assembled specialist teams, and refused to bring weak cases for applause — even under political pressure. South Africa now faces a clear choice: another six years of excuses and failed prosecutions, or a credible, fearless, evidence-driven NPA able to prosecute powerful politicians and follow the money. If President Ramaphosa appoints Hermione Cronje, it will send a powerful signal that this presidency is serious about accountability, serious about justice, and serious about restoring public trust in the state. This is not just an appointment. It is a test of leadership and a moment that will define his legacy.

Goolam

58,187 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten