正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

The post summarizes a 2016 Temple University study published in Scientific Reports, where CRISPR/Cas9 excised HIV-1 DNA from infected human T-cells, rendering them resistant to re-infection without off-target effects. Also check out the work from leor weinberger at Gladstone Institutes on TIPs hijacking therapy! TED Talks

Carl Freer

49,569 subscribers

15,188 次观看 • 10 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

健康养生科学技术新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

THE CONTRASTING EFFECTS OF BLUE AND RED/NIR LIGHT ON THE MITOCHONDRIA. - Recent research published this year in Nature: Scientific Reports demonstrates the effects that light in the built environment has on human health. Our modern build environment is dominated by short-wavelength light from LEDs and fluorescent lighting. This can have deleterious effects on the mitochondria. Adding to this effect is the lack of long-wavelength light from sources like the sun and incandescent lighting bulbs. These long light wavelengths have a beneficial effect on mitochondria function and overall human health. The lack of them in our modern built environment, seems to be impacting public health in a delirious fashion. Two recent papers to read: 1. 2.

THE CONTRASTING EFFECTS OF BLUE AND RED/NIR LIGHT ON THE MITOCHONDRIA. - Recent research published this year in Nature: Scientific Reports demonstrates the effects that light in the built environment has on human health. Our modern build environment is dominated by short-wavelength light from LEDs and fluorescent lighting. This can have deleterious effects on the mitochondria. Adding to this effect is the lack of long-wavelength light from sources like the sun and incandescent lighting bulbs. These long light wavelengths have a beneficial effect on mitochondria function and overall human health. The lack of them in our modern built environment, seems to be impacting public health in a delirious fashion. Two recent papers to read: 1. 2.

Jonathan Jarecki

17,850 次观看 • 5 个月前

Many people often times wonder why it is that mosquitoes transmit malaria from one person to another but same mosquito cannot transmit HIV from one person to another. I summarized the reason in this video but I will also reiterate 1. HIV cannot survive inside mosquitoes When mosquito bites someone infected with HIV, it actually picks up some of the virus . However the virus is rapidly broken down in the gut of the mosquito . Hence it does not get passed to the next person. 2. Mosquitoes do not inject previous blood into the next person When mosquitoes bite a person, they inject saliva into the person’s bite spot and this saliva is what prevents the blood from clotting while the mosquito sucks out the blood juice. It is through this process of injection of saliva that it passes Malaria , Dengue fever etc but HIV can’t be passed this way 3. HIV can only survive I specific body cells HIV needs specific body cells called CD4 cells to survive . Of course mosquito does not have those cells and HIV can thus not survive inside them. It is degraded immediately Therefore when next someone suggests that Mosquito can transmit HIV. Please feel free to give them a resounding slap on my behalf . Thank You Dr Penking

Many people often times wonder why it is that mosquitoes transmit malaria from one person to another but same mosquito cannot transmit HIV from one person to another. I summarized the reason in this video but I will also reiterate 1. HIV cannot survive inside mosquitoes When mosquito bites someone infected with HIV, it actually picks up some of the virus . However the virus is rapidly broken down in the gut of the mosquito . Hence it does not get passed to the next person. 2. Mosquitoes do not inject previous blood into the next person When mosquitoes bite a person, they inject saliva into the person’s bite spot and this saliva is what prevents the blood from clotting while the mosquito sucks out the blood juice. It is through this process of injection of saliva that it passes Malaria , Dengue fever etc but HIV can’t be passed this way 3. HIV can only survive I specific body cells HIV needs specific body cells called CD4 cells to survive . Of course mosquito does not have those cells and HIV can thus not survive inside them. It is degraded immediately Therefore when next someone suggests that Mosquito can transmit HIV. Please feel free to give them a resounding slap on my behalf . Thank You Dr Penking

Dr Penking™

59,932 次观看 • 3 个月前

Cancer - Chemotherapy wipes out the cells that "protect your body from cancer" For decades, the fundamental protocol for fighting cancer has been chemotherapy and radiation. But what if this approach inadvertently disarms the body's most powerful weapon against the very disease it seeks to destroy? Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong explains the profound and simple truth: When a patient undergoes chemotherapy, it systematically wipes out critical components of the immune system. 1. It wipes out red blood cells, causing anemia. We have a drug for that: Epogen. 2. It wipes out neutrophils, which prevent infection. We have a drug for that: Neupogen. 3. But most critically, it decimates the lymphocytes—the NK and T cells. Here lies the devastating irony: The NK and T cells are the only cells in the human body that can recognize and kill cancer. So, within days, the standard of care eliminates the patient's primary defense system. For 35 years, we have treated the side effects of anemia and infection, all while having no therapy to restore the very cells that matter most. Dr. Soon-Shiong’s two-decade fight has been to illuminate this paradigm. We have been unintentionally protecting the patient from the consequences of our own treatments while undermining their innate ability to survive. This principle extends beyond oncology. In Long COVID, a similar pattern emerges—a viral infection that cleverly disables the T and NK cells. The lesson is clear: The future of medicine lies not in breaking the body down, but in strategically rebuilding and empowering its innate intelligence. It’s a call to move beyond managing collateral damage and to start fortifying the core of our biological defenses.

Cancer - Chemotherapy wipes out the cells that "protect your body from cancer" For decades, the fundamental protocol for fighting cancer has been chemotherapy and radiation. But what if this approach inadvertently disarms the body's most powerful weapon against the very disease it seeks to destroy? Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong explains the profound and simple truth: When a patient undergoes chemotherapy, it systematically wipes out critical components of the immune system. 1. It wipes out red blood cells, causing anemia. We have a drug for that: Epogen. 2. It wipes out neutrophils, which prevent infection. We have a drug for that: Neupogen. 3. But most critically, it decimates the lymphocytes—the NK and T cells. Here lies the devastating irony: The NK and T cells are the only cells in the human body that can recognize and kill cancer. So, within days, the standard of care eliminates the patient's primary defense system. For 35 years, we have treated the side effects of anemia and infection, all while having no therapy to restore the very cells that matter most. Dr. Soon-Shiong’s two-decade fight has been to illuminate this paradigm. We have been unintentionally protecting the patient from the consequences of our own treatments while undermining their innate ability to survive. This principle extends beyond oncology. In Long COVID, a similar pattern emerges—a viral infection that cleverly disables the T and NK cells. The lesson is clear: The future of medicine lies not in breaking the body down, but in strategically rebuilding and empowering its innate intelligence. It’s a call to move beyond managing collateral damage and to start fortifying the core of our biological defenses.

Camus

61,712 次观看 • 9 个月前

Just gonna drop this below One of the lead investigators of the Yale study that I am A research participant in has blocked me I’ve emailed the Listen study twice with no response requesting information on the IRB and why I was locked out of my own account and medical records- (see emails below) Ive also emailed the Yale Human Research Protection Program requesting the same information and informing them I have had no response from the Study and that I was locked out of my own medical data- still no response from them either-(email below) What institution and research lead investigator treats their participants like this? *** THIS NEEDS TO BE SEEN BY ALL ON HOW THE BIOWEAPON INJURED ARE TREATED, ABUSED, GASLIGHTED, AND PROFITED OFF OF ON A DAILY BASIS - WE ARE TREATED EVEN WORSE IF WE SPEAK OUT ABOUT OUR CONFIRMED, DIAGNOSED AND DOCUMENTED INJURY FROM A ADULTERATED, CONTAMINATED, AND FRAUDULENT PRODUCT *** Would love to hear thoughts from other researchers who conduct trials, any lawyers, and advice on how to proceed or where to go from here… TIA SHAME ON YOU HARLAN KRUMHOLZ & YALE UNIVERSITY - Harlan Krumholz Yale University Yale UniversityMed THE WORLD AND GOD SEES YOU AND WE DONT LIKE UGLY CC: Jikkyleaks 🐭

Just gonna drop this below One of the lead investigators of the Yale study that I am A research participant in has blocked me I’ve emailed the Listen study twice with no response requesting information on the IRB and why I was locked out of my own account and medical records- (see emails below) Ive also emailed the Yale Human Research Protection Program requesting the same information and informing them I have had no response from the Study and that I was locked out of my own medical data- still no response from them either-(email below) What institution and research lead investigator treats their participants like this? * THIS NEEDS TO BE SEEN BY ALL ON HOW THE BIOWEAPON INJURED ARE TREATED, ABUSED, GASLIGHTED, AND PROFITED OFF OF ON A DAILY BASIS - WE ARE TREATED EVEN WORSE IF WE SPEAK OUT ABOUT OUR CONFIRMED, DIAGNOSED AND DOCUMENTED INJURY FROM A ADULTERATED, CONTAMINATED, AND FRAUDULENT PRODUCT * Would love to hear thoughts from other researchers who conduct trials, any lawyers, and advice on how to proceed or where to go from here… TIA SHAME ON YOU HARLAN KRUMHOLZ & YALE UNIVERSITY - Harlan Krumholz Yale University Yale UniversityMed THE WORLD AND GOD SEES YOU AND WE DONT LIKE UGLY CC: Jikkyleaks 🐭

Lyndsey, RN 💜🐭

273,961 次观看 • 1 年前

⏰ THE MOST BANNED THREAD IN THE WORLD! 🚨 The War On Resonance PART FIVE: The Final Sterilization Protocol IGNORANCE IS NO LONGER ACCEPTABLE! If this knowledge is not received, remembered, and shared; THE HUMAN RACE WILL CEASE TO EXIST. THE CHOICE IS NOW YOURS. They knew they couldn’t kill God. So instead... they tried to kill the memory of God inside of you. What began as a quiet experiment in infertility has become a planetary extinction protocol: not by bombs or bullets, but by signal, by consent, by silence. And if you want to understand how they plan to delete the human soul... forever; you need to know where they’ve hidden the final mechanisms. They’re not in war zones anymore. They’re in your kitchen, your classroom, your air supply... in the very places you were taught to trust. Let me take you there. ☠️ THE KILL SWITCH MENU: FOOD AS A WEAPONIZED DELIVERY SYSTEM The next phase of biological sterilization is now hidden in your plate, your pantry, your packaging. This is not speculation; it’s embedded in patents and production protocols: Lipid Nanoparticle Contamination in Global Food Supply Pfizer’s own biodistribution studies show rapid ovarian accumulation. Now, the same LNP structures are being sprayed onto crops via mRNA “edible vaccines”, falsely labeled as “climate-resilient biotech.” Edible Vaccines "One day children may get immunized by munching on foods instead of enduring shots. More important, food vaccines might save millions who now die for lack of access to traditional inoculants" 🔗 Digital University Aula in Nanotechnology education to fight COVID 19 Nano-Code 🔗 Pfizer LNP Biodistribution Study - Page 16 🔗 Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine (BNT162, PF-07302048) TGA Pre-Submission Meeting September 18, 2020 🔗 Brand Name Comirnaty Intramuscular Injection Non-proprietary Name Coronavirus Modified Uridine RNA Vaccine (SARS-CoV-2) (Active ingredient: Tozinameran [JAN*]) Applicant Pfizer Japan Inc. Date of Application December 18, 2020 Table 1 Pharmacokinetics of LUCIFERase RNA-encapsulated LNPs, ALC-0315 and ALC0159, when administered intravenously to Wistar Han rats at a dose of 1 mg RNA/kg..... 4 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Plasma and liver concentrations of ALC-0315 and ALC-0159 after intravenous administration of LUCIFERase RNA-encapsulated LNPs at a dose of 1 mg RNA/kg to Wistar Han rats..... 5 Figure 2 In vivo luminescence in BALB/c mice intramuscularly treated with LUCIFERase RNA-encapsulated LNP..... 6 Figure 3 Estimated in vivo metabolic pathways of ALC-0315 in various animal species..8 Figure 4 Estimated in vivo metabolic pathways of ALC-0159 in various animal species. 9 🔗 🔗 Biodistribution of RNA Vaccines and of Their Products: Evidence from Human and Animal Studies 🔗 Nonclinical Evaluation Report BNT162b2 [mRNA] COVID-19 vaccine (COMIRNATYTM) Submission No: PM-2020-05461-1-2 Sponsor: Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd January 2021 🔗 Luciferase mRNA Transfection of Antigen Presenting Cells Permits Sensitive Nonradioactive Measurement of Cellular and Humoral Cytotoxicity 🔗 CRISPR-Edited Meat and Produce Companies like Ginkgo Bioworks, funded by DARPA and the Gates Foundation, are engineering DNA-edited livestock and grains that introduce heritable gene silencing traits through ingestion. These payloads are not just physical. They are frequency-coded to activate upon specific satellite signals from the 5G grid. You’re not just being poisoned. You’re being programmed... by dinner. CRISPR Food Industry Mapping How Helpful May Be a CRISPR/Cas-Based System for Food Traceability? 🔗 Adoption of CRISPR-Cas for crop production: present status and future prospects 🔗 Crop bioengineering via gene editing: reshaping the future of agriculture 🔗 CRISPR/Cas genome editing system and its application in potato 🔗 Analysis of the Utilization and Prospects of CRISPR-Cas Technology in the Annotation of Gene Function and Creation New Germplasm in Maize Based on Patent Data 🔗 CRISPR/Cas9 Technology and Its Utility for Crop Improvement 🔗 CRISPR-Based Genome Editing for Nutrient Enrichment in Crops: A Promising Approach Toward Global Food Security 🔗 Mechanism and Applications of CRISPR/Cas-9-Mediated Genome Editing 🔗 Application of CRISPR/Cas9 in Crop Quality Improvement 🔗 Recent Advances in the Application of CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing System in Poultry Species 🔗 Mapping CRISPR-Cas9 public and commercial innovation using The Lens institutional toolkit 🔗 How Helpful May Be a CRISPR/Cas-Based System for Food Traceability? 🔗 A Critical Review: Recent Advancements in the Use of CRISPR/Cas9 Technology to Enhance Crops and Alleviate Global Food Crises 🔗 Application of CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing technology in various fields: A review 🔗 A technological and regulatory outlook on CRISPR crop editing 🔗 Theragnostic application of nanoparticle and CRISPR against food-borne multi-drug resistant pathogens 🔗 Recent Advances of CRISPR/Cas9-Based Genetic Engineering and Transcriptional Regulation in Industrial Biology 🔗 Genome-Editing Products Line up for the Market: Will Europe Harvest the Benefits from Science and Innovation? 🔗 Rest assured... I HAVE THE EVIDENCE, I AM FILING SUBPOENAS AND JUSTICE WILL BE SERVED! CONTINUED IN COMMENTS BELOW, REACHED MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF LINKS ALLOWED 👇

Noah B. Price

152,192 次观看 • 1 年前

Cancer Has a Proven Frequency “Kill Switch” 🧬⚡️ In 1986, the US Government granted Patent 4,622,952 for a technology that destroys cancer cells with zero side effects. No chemo. No radiation. Just resonance. The science is based on a narrow 1°C thermal window: cancer cells die at 45.5°C, while healthy cells can survive up to 46.5°C. The Gordon Method: 📍 Resonant Absorption: Every cell vibrates at a specific frequency. Cancer cells, with their altered DNA, have a different “signature” than healthy cells. 📍 Internal Heating: By sweeping an EM field to 450 kHz, only the cancer cells absorb energy. They heat from the inside out and disintegrate. 📍 The Result: Healthy tissue remains unaffected because it isn’t “tuned” to that frequency. It was tested, it worked, and it was buried. Why? Because a one-time frequency treatment doesn’t create the recurring revenue of chemotherapy. [h/t HarmonicEarthTheory on IG]

Cancer Has a Proven Frequency “Kill Switch” 🧬⚡️ In 1986, the US Government granted Patent 4,622,952 for a technology that destroys cancer cells with zero side effects. No chemo. No radiation. Just resonance. The science is based on a narrow 1°C thermal window: cancer cells die at 45.5°C, while healthy cells can survive up to 46.5°C. The Gordon Method: 📍 Resonant Absorption: Every cell vibrates at a specific frequency. Cancer cells, with their altered DNA, have a different “signature” than healthy cells. 📍 Internal Heating: By sweeping an EM field to 450 kHz, only the cancer cells absorb energy. They heat from the inside out and disintegrate. 📍 The Result: Healthy tissue remains unaffected because it isn’t “tuned” to that frequency. It was tested, it worked, and it was buried. Why? Because a one-time frequency treatment doesn’t create the recurring revenue of chemotherapy. [h/t HarmonicEarthTheory on IG]

Ben Wehrman

113,949 次观看 • 24 天前

A toxicologist's devastating testimony on how COVID-19 mRNA vaccines could cause cancer and alter the human gene pool. This is a must-read. Dr. Lindsay Janci just laid out a harrowing case. The concern isn't just short-term side effects; it's the potential for genetic vaccines to drive cancer and be passed to future generations. Her summary is a masterclass in scientific alarm. Here are the 9+ potential pathways to cancer she detailed: 1. LNP Delivery to Stem Cells: Lipid Nanoparticles (LNPs) don't just go to muscle cells. They readily transfect hemopoietic stem cells—the origin of all our blood cells. 2. Cancer Metastasis: LNPs may cause pre-existing cancer cells to spread more easily by inducing "endothelial leakiness." 3. Inherent LNP Oncogenicity: The LNPs themselves might have cancer-causing effects, which have never been studied. 4. The SV40 Promoter: Hidden plasmid DNA in the vaccines contains the powerful SV40 promoter. If this genetic switch integrates near an oncogene, it could explosively drive cancer growth. 5. SV40 Enhancer (Nuclear Targeting): This sequence is designed to rush DNA into the cell nucleus—a key step for "insertional mutagenesis," where foreign DNA disrupts our own genes. 6. Spike Protein & p53: The spike protein itself has been shown to inhibit p53, a critical tumor suppressor protein that stops cancer from developing. 7. Insertional Mutagenesis & Frameshifts: Plasmid DNA doesn't need SV40 to get into the nucleus. Once integrated, it can cause frameshift mutations, leading to aberrant, cancer-causing proteins. 8. mRNA Reverse Transcription: The mRNA can be reverse-transcribed back into DNA and integrated into our genome, a known cancer mechanism, especially in ovaries & testes where reverse transcriptase is high. 9. Immunosuppression: The vaccines may suppress specialized T-cells that act as "guards" keeping dormant cancer clones in check. Weakening this guard can lead to a surge in cancers, similar to what we see in aging pets. But it gets worse. Dr. Janci issued a grave warning about heritable genetic damage: The DNA plasmids and reverse-transcribed DNA can potentially integrate into sperm and ova (gametes). This means the genetic payload could be passed to our children and "contaminate the gene pool." She reveals two mechanisms: - Genomic Integration: Direct insertion into the gamete's DNA, likely causing cancer in offspring rather than functional spike production. . Sperm-Mediated Gene Transfer (SMGT): A process where sperm can carry extra-chromosomal DNA and pass it on to the next generation without full genomic integration, leading to constitutive spike protein expression in children. The most chilling part? Dr. Janci states that this is "not being investigated at all." Despite reaching out to multiple labs, no one is testing sperm or ova from vaccinated individuals for these integrations. This isn't conspiracy theory. This is a credentialed toxicologist presenting a plausible, mechanistic roadmap for a public health catastrophe. The absolute lack of curiosity from health agencies is deafening. The question is no longer if there are risks, but why those in charge are refusing to look.

A toxicologist's devastating testimony on how COVID-19 mRNA vaccines could cause cancer and alter the human gene pool. This is a must-read. Dr. Lindsay Janci just laid out a harrowing case. The concern isn't just short-term side effects; it's the potential for genetic vaccines to drive cancer and be passed to future generations. Her summary is a masterclass in scientific alarm. Here are the 9+ potential pathways to cancer she detailed: 1. LNP Delivery to Stem Cells: Lipid Nanoparticles (LNPs) don't just go to muscle cells. They readily transfect hemopoietic stem cells—the origin of all our blood cells. 2. Cancer Metastasis: LNPs may cause pre-existing cancer cells to spread more easily by inducing "endothelial leakiness." 3. Inherent LNP Oncogenicity: The LNPs themselves might have cancer-causing effects, which have never been studied. 4. The SV40 Promoter: Hidden plasmid DNA in the vaccines contains the powerful SV40 promoter. If this genetic switch integrates near an oncogene, it could explosively drive cancer growth. 5. SV40 Enhancer (Nuclear Targeting): This sequence is designed to rush DNA into the cell nucleus—a key step for "insertional mutagenesis," where foreign DNA disrupts our own genes. 6. Spike Protein & p53: The spike protein itself has been shown to inhibit p53, a critical tumor suppressor protein that stops cancer from developing. 7. Insertional Mutagenesis & Frameshifts: Plasmid DNA doesn't need SV40 to get into the nucleus. Once integrated, it can cause frameshift mutations, leading to aberrant, cancer-causing proteins. 8. mRNA Reverse Transcription: The mRNA can be reverse-transcribed back into DNA and integrated into our genome, a known cancer mechanism, especially in ovaries & testes where reverse transcriptase is high. 9. Immunosuppression: The vaccines may suppress specialized T-cells that act as "guards" keeping dormant cancer clones in check. Weakening this guard can lead to a surge in cancers, similar to what we see in aging pets. But it gets worse. Dr. Janci issued a grave warning about heritable genetic damage: The DNA plasmids and reverse-transcribed DNA can potentially integrate into sperm and ova (gametes). This means the genetic payload could be passed to our children and "contaminate the gene pool." She reveals two mechanisms: - Genomic Integration: Direct insertion into the gamete's DNA, likely causing cancer in offspring rather than functional spike production. . Sperm-Mediated Gene Transfer (SMGT): A process where sperm can carry extra-chromosomal DNA and pass it on to the next generation without full genomic integration, leading to constitutive spike protein expression in children. The most chilling part? Dr. Janci states that this is "not being investigated at all." Despite reaching out to multiple labs, no one is testing sperm or ova from vaccinated individuals for these integrations. This isn't conspiracy theory. This is a credentialed toxicologist presenting a plausible, mechanistic roadmap for a public health catastrophe. The absolute lack of curiosity from health agencies is deafening. The question is no longer if there are risks, but why those in charge are refusing to look.

Camus

18,244 次观看 • 10 个月前

RFK Jr. began the hearing by revealing just how insane some of the NIH-funded studies were when he took over HHS. Many of them have now been eliminated. “Very few of the studies that were being done by NIH were being done on chronic disease.” “NIH should be telling us what are seed oils doing to our children, what high fructose corn syrup is doing to our children, what food dyes are doing to our children, what is the packaging and microplastics doing to our children, and what are pesticides doing to our children.” “There was a $2.2 million study from Boston University to study the effects of exogenous testosterone therapy on communication in gender diverse speakers.” “We cut a $3 million study at the University of Pennsylvania that studied anti vaping social media campaigns targeted toward sexual gender minority teens between 13-18.” “We cut a $1 million study at the University of Michigan to study sexual fluidity and longitudinal changes in alcohol misuse.” “Those are some example of thousands of studies like that, that were doing nothing to improve American health.”

RFK Jr. began the hearing by revealing just how insane some of the NIH-funded studies were when he took over HHS. Many of them have now been eliminated. “Very few of the studies that were being done by NIH were being done on chronic disease.” “NIH should be telling us what are seed oils doing to our children, what high fructose corn syrup is doing to our children, what food dyes are doing to our children, what is the packaging and microplastics doing to our children, and what are pesticides doing to our children.” “There was a $2.2 million study from Boston University to study the effects of exogenous testosterone therapy on communication in gender diverse speakers.” “We cut a $3 million study at the University of Pennsylvania that studied anti vaping social media campaigns targeted toward sexual gender minority teens between 13-18.” “We cut a $1 million study at the University of Michigan to study sexual fluidity and longitudinal changes in alcohol misuse.” “Those are some example of thousands of studies like that, that were doing nothing to improve American health.”

MAHA PAC🗽

13,739 次观看 • 1 年前

Top-Tier Journal Confirms Mechanism of COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced Heart Damage The conversation around vaccines is shifting, with HHS emphasizing informed consent over mandates. This new approach is having a direct market impact, with recent reports showing Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccine sales tumbling. The reason? The public is increasingly examining the science. A landmark study published in Circulation, the flagship journal of the American Heart Association and a top-tier cardiovascular publication, has delivered a critical finding. The research identifies the precise mechanism behind myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA vaccination. Here is the breakdown in plain English: The study reveals that in certain susceptible individuals, the immune system's T cells—trained by the vaccine to attack the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein—also mistakenly attack similar-looking proteins in heart tissue. This phenomenon, known as "molecular mimicry," means the body's defenses cannot reliably distinguish the virus from the heart itself, leading to an autoimmune attack on the cardiac muscle. Crucially, the study found this specific, expanded immune response in patients with post-vaccine myopericarditis, but not in those who had developed myocarditis from a natural COVID-19 infection. The implications are profound. This is no longer a debate based on epidemiological signals or VAERS data. A leading mainstream medical journal has published a study pinpointing a direct autoimmune mechanism for vaccine-induced heart damage that is distinct from the damage caused by the virus. With this level of evidence now in the public domain, the call for a science-driven reassessment of vaccine policies has never been stronger. The argument has moved from the fringe to the forefront of established medical literature. The question now is: What will it take for health authorities to officially acknowledge these findings and adjust their recommendations accordingly?

Top-Tier Journal Confirms Mechanism of COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced Heart Damage The conversation around vaccines is shifting, with HHS emphasizing informed consent over mandates. This new approach is having a direct market impact, with recent reports showing Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccine sales tumbling. The reason? The public is increasingly examining the science. A landmark study published in Circulation, the flagship journal of the American Heart Association and a top-tier cardiovascular publication, has delivered a critical finding. The research identifies the precise mechanism behind myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA vaccination. Here is the breakdown in plain English: The study reveals that in certain susceptible individuals, the immune system's T cells—trained by the vaccine to attack the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein—also mistakenly attack similar-looking proteins in heart tissue. This phenomenon, known as "molecular mimicry," means the body's defenses cannot reliably distinguish the virus from the heart itself, leading to an autoimmune attack on the cardiac muscle. Crucially, the study found this specific, expanded immune response in patients with post-vaccine myopericarditis, but not in those who had developed myocarditis from a natural COVID-19 infection. The implications are profound. This is no longer a debate based on epidemiological signals or VAERS data. A leading mainstream medical journal has published a study pinpointing a direct autoimmune mechanism for vaccine-induced heart damage that is distinct from the damage caused by the virus. With this level of evidence now in the public domain, the call for a science-driven reassessment of vaccine policies has never been stronger. The argument has moved from the fringe to the forefront of established medical literature. The question now is: What will it take for health authorities to officially acknowledge these findings and adjust their recommendations accordingly?

Camus

12,290 次观看 • 8 个月前

Del Bigtree Exposes “Molecular Mimicry” – The Tragic Mistake of the Vaccine Era What if the immune system has been taught to attack the body itself? In a striking on-stage demonstration, Del Bigtree laid out one of the most disturbing vaccine mechanisms now emerging in medical literature: cell mimicry. Using simple props, he illustrated how injected mRNA instructs human cells to produce spike proteins that resemble the virus — but not perfectly. When killer T-cells target these vaccine-made proteins, they may also begin to mistake similar-looking features on human tissue — such as heart cells — for the enemy. This, Bigtree explained, could help explain why journals like Circulation are now acknowledging the risk of an autoimmune response targeting the heart itself. If T-cells can no longer tell “self” from “non-self,” a cascade of chronic illness may follow — myocarditis, diabetes, multiple sclerosis, and more. Bigtree argued that without long-term placebo trials, regulators missed the silent rise of immune confusion — creating what he calls the “autoimmune crisis of our lifetime.” With over half of American children now suffering chronic diseases, he insists only one study could still reveal the truth: the vaccinated vs. unvaccinated comparison. Bigtree then turned to the suppressed Henry Ford Health Study, which reportedly found dramatically higher rates of illness among vaccinated children. According to him, the results were buried — labeled “unworthy” of publication for failing to meet “scientific standards.” The footage from that investigation will appear in Bigtree’s forthcoming film, An Inconvenient Study — a direct challenge to the vaccine establishment’s refusal to confront its own data. This is not just about one vaccine. It’s about whether an entire generation’s immune systems are being rewritten — permanently.

Del Bigtree Exposes “Molecular Mimicry” – The Tragic Mistake of the Vaccine Era What if the immune system has been taught to attack the body itself? In a striking on-stage demonstration, Del Bigtree laid out one of the most disturbing vaccine mechanisms now emerging in medical literature: cell mimicry. Using simple props, he illustrated how injected mRNA instructs human cells to produce spike proteins that resemble the virus — but not perfectly. When killer T-cells target these vaccine-made proteins, they may also begin to mistake similar-looking features on human tissue — such as heart cells — for the enemy. This, Bigtree explained, could help explain why journals like Circulation are now acknowledging the risk of an autoimmune response targeting the heart itself. If T-cells can no longer tell “self” from “non-self,” a cascade of chronic illness may follow — myocarditis, diabetes, multiple sclerosis, and more. Bigtree argued that without long-term placebo trials, regulators missed the silent rise of immune confusion — creating what he calls the “autoimmune crisis of our lifetime.” With over half of American children now suffering chronic diseases, he insists only one study could still reveal the truth: the vaccinated vs. unvaccinated comparison. Bigtree then turned to the suppressed Henry Ford Health Study, which reportedly found dramatically higher rates of illness among vaccinated children. According to him, the results were buried — labeled “unworthy” of publication for failing to meet “scientific standards.” The footage from that investigation will appear in Bigtree’s forthcoming film, An Inconvenient Study — a direct challenge to the vaccine establishment’s refusal to confront its own data. This is not just about one vaccine. It’s about whether an entire generation’s immune systems are being rewritten — permanently.

Camus

15,710 次观看 • 8 个月前

Aspirin — the cheap pill sitting in your medicine cabinet — could become a powerful new tool against cancer. A March 2025 study published in Nature found that aspirin helps “unleash” T-cells in the immune system, making them more effective at hunting down and attacking cancer cells, including metastatic ones. Dr. Elisa Port, Chief of Breast Surgery at Mount Sinai, explained on CBS News that this ties into the same mechanism that makes aspirin effective at preventing blood clots and heart disease. The research builds on earlier work showing aspirin’s anti-inflammatory effects can enhance immunotherapy responses by reducing platelet-driven immune suppression. It’s still early stages (mostly animal data so far), and doctors aren’t recommending it for cancer prevention yet — but the potential is intriguing. It’s honestly wild that something so common and inexpensive might play a real role in fighting cancer. Shows how much we still have to discover about everyday medicines. If this holds up in larger human trials, it could offer a low-cost way to support cancer treatment for millions. Would you be excited or cautious if a common drug like aspirin turned out to have real anti-cancer effects?

Aspirin — the cheap pill sitting in your medicine cabinet — could become a powerful new tool against cancer. A March 2025 study published in Nature found that aspirin helps “unleash” T-cells in the immune system, making them more effective at hunting down and attacking cancer cells, including metastatic ones. Dr. Elisa Port, Chief of Breast Surgery at Mount Sinai, explained on CBS News that this ties into the same mechanism that makes aspirin effective at preventing blood clots and heart disease. The research builds on earlier work showing aspirin’s anti-inflammatory effects can enhance immunotherapy responses by reducing platelet-driven immune suppression. It’s still early stages (mostly animal data so far), and doctors aren’t recommending it for cancer prevention yet — but the potential is intriguing. It’s honestly wild that something so common and inexpensive might play a real role in fighting cancer. Shows how much we still have to discover about everyday medicines. If this holds up in larger human trials, it could offer a low-cost way to support cancer treatment for millions. Would you be excited or cautious if a common drug like aspirin turned out to have real anti-cancer effects?

Camus

29,233 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨 WHY ARE THERE OVER 400 PUBLISHED PAPERS ON IVERMECTIN AND CANCER? Because researchers discovered something unexpected. Ivermectin doesn't just target parasites. According to preclinical research, it appears to interact with cancer cells through multiple biological pathways. One of the most discussed? 📌 Cancer Stem Cells These are the cells believed to survive treatment, remain dormant for years, and potentially contribute to recurrence and spread. According to Dr. William Makis: 💊 Chemotherapy primarily targets rapidly dividing cancer cells. 💊 Ivermectin has been studied for its potential effects on cancer stem cells. That's why some researchers believe the combination deserves attention. But that's only part of the story. Researchers have also investigated ivermectin's potential ability to: ✅ Target cancer stem cells ✅ Influence tumor signaling pathways ✅ Alter cancer cell behavior ✅ Reverse chemotherapy resistance One of the most fascinating findings involves chemotherapy resistance. Over time, some cancer cells develop the ability to push chemotherapy drugs back out of the cell. Researchers have reported that ivermectin may interfere with these resistance mechanisms, potentially making cancer cells susceptible again. And then there's Fenbendazole and Mebendazole. While Ivermectin is being studied for one set of mechanisms, Fenbendazole and Mebendazole appear to work differently. Researchers have investigated their potential ability to: 📌 Block glucose transporters on cancer cells 📌 Reduce the cell's ability to use glucose as fuel 📌 Interfere with pathways associated with tumor growth Think about that. Different compounds. Different mechanisms. The same goal. That's why scientists continue publishing study after study. Not because these compounds are a fad. Because researchers keep uncovering new biological pathways worth investigating. And that's why the conversation around Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, and Mebendazole continues to grow. 💊 If you’re looking into these drugs, check out Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, and Mebendazole from RXMEDS.STORE. #Ivermectin #Fenbendazole #Mebendazole #CancerResearch #CancerStemCells #RepurposedDrugs #CancerBiology #RxMeds

🚨 WHY ARE THERE OVER 400 PUBLISHED PAPERS ON IVERMECTIN AND CANCER? Because researchers discovered something unexpected. Ivermectin doesn't just target parasites. According to preclinical research, it appears to interact with cancer cells through multiple biological pathways. One of the most discussed? 📌 Cancer Stem Cells These are the cells believed to survive treatment, remain dormant for years, and potentially contribute to recurrence and spread. According to Dr. William Makis: 💊 Chemotherapy primarily targets rapidly dividing cancer cells. 💊 Ivermectin has been studied for its potential effects on cancer stem cells. That's why some researchers believe the combination deserves attention. But that's only part of the story. Researchers have also investigated ivermectin's potential ability to: ✅ Target cancer stem cells ✅ Influence tumor signaling pathways ✅ Alter cancer cell behavior ✅ Reverse chemotherapy resistance One of the most fascinating findings involves chemotherapy resistance. Over time, some cancer cells develop the ability to push chemotherapy drugs back out of the cell. Researchers have reported that ivermectin may interfere with these resistance mechanisms, potentially making cancer cells susceptible again. And then there's Fenbendazole and Mebendazole. While Ivermectin is being studied for one set of mechanisms, Fenbendazole and Mebendazole appear to work differently. Researchers have investigated their potential ability to: 📌 Block glucose transporters on cancer cells 📌 Reduce the cell's ability to use glucose as fuel 📌 Interfere with pathways associated with tumor growth Think about that. Different compounds. Different mechanisms. The same goal. That's why scientists continue publishing study after study. Not because these compounds are a fad. Because researchers keep uncovering new biological pathways worth investigating. And that's why the conversation around Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, and Mebendazole continues to grow. 💊 If you’re looking into these drugs, check out Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, and Mebendazole from RXMEDS.STORE. #Ivermectin #Fenbendazole #Mebendazole #CancerResearch #CancerStemCells #RepurposedDrugs #CancerBiology #RxMeds

RXMEDS.STORE

16,612 次观看 • 1 个月前

THE MAKING OF BIOWEAPONS HIV TO 5G Sasha Stone: I want you to also please speak about the protocols that you've brought forward. Judy Mikovits, PhD: The very interesting thing, Sasha, what Mark just said is the lanthanide. So the lanthanides, in their fluorescence excitation, was what I did at the University of Virginia in 1978-79, was to study the excitation, meaning fluorescently, you excite them, and then you watch how long it takes for the fluorescence, for the light to change, for the spectral clustering to change. So in fact, the transreceptor potential, that's a transistor radio. All that signal has to do is touch in an energetic field the outside of the sensors on the cells. They're called TRP, transreceptor potential, the alloyed one, A-1, is where your protection from all those deadly hydrocarbons. We know those censors. And how interesting that I started at the National Cancer Institute, June 10, 1980 when the first bioweapon, HIV, which never was LAV. What we have to understand is they finetuned these bio weapons and then tried purposely to divide each other. HIV was a gain of function injected in every single Hepatitis B shot since 1989-91 right in there, that didn't work very well because it didn't aerosolize. 09/20/2025 - 5G APOCALYPSE CRISIS SUMMIT: WE ISOLATED LAV - THE FIRST FAUCI GAIN OF FUNCTION WAS HIV: sacha stone

THE MAKING OF BIOWEAPONS HIV TO 5G Sasha Stone: I want you to also please speak about the protocols that you've brought forward. Judy Mikovits, PhD: The very interesting thing, Sasha, what Mark just said is the lanthanide. So the lanthanides, in their fluorescence excitation, was what I did at the University of Virginia in 1978-79, was to study the excitation, meaning fluorescently, you excite them, and then you watch how long it takes for the fluorescence, for the light to change, for the spectral clustering to change. So in fact, the transreceptor potential, that's a transistor radio. All that signal has to do is touch in an energetic field the outside of the sensors on the cells. They're called TRP, transreceptor potential, the alloyed one, A-1, is where your protection from all those deadly hydrocarbons. We know those censors. And how interesting that I started at the National Cancer Institute, June 10, 1980 when the first bioweapon, HIV, which never was LAV. What we have to understand is they finetuned these bio weapons and then tried purposely to divide each other. HIV was a gain of function injected in every single Hepatitis B shot since 1989-91 right in there, that didn't work very well because it didn't aerosolize. 09/20/2025 - 5G APOCALYPSE CRISIS SUMMIT: WE ISOLATED LAV - THE FIRST FAUCI GAIN OF FUNCTION WAS HIV: sacha stone

Judy A. Mikovits PhD

17,106 次观看 • 10 个月前

BOYCOTT William Hill !!!!! So according to William Hill. Lukas Hornicek DIDN’T save this shot from Vicenzo Grifo. Even though- 1. You can clearly see he gets fingertips to it 2. His fingers bend back AFTER touching the ball 3. The ball then slightly changes direction and goes onto the post 4. You even hear the commentators say the keeper got fingertips to it to save it onto the post They even told me if I prove it they’ll escalate it but won’t accept my video as proof 😂😂😂 Even though William Hill and most betting companies state “any shot that is touched onto the post is a shot on target” they’re denying this is a shot on target and even said “the bet wasn’t settled on video footage” I’ve sent them all the proof they need to see it’s a shot on target that the keeper touches onto the post which according to their rules is a shot on target and a save. They’ve not settled this as a save or a shot on target even though he clearly tips it onto the post. They even tried to bend their own rules saying if a keeper tips it onto the post then it’s a “shot” and not a “shot on target” which is a lie They even paid out part of the bet and said “WON” so if they’re adamant it didn’t win then why did they partly pay out ? 😂 It either won or it didn’t win. The fact they’re denying the keeper saved this has meant I didn’t win and I’ll never use them again unless this is resolved. Seen so many tweets like this recently where betting companies are ignoring factual evidence in videos to deny people of their winnings but happy enough to take money straight away off people So do not use William Hill as when you show them proof they deny it, break their own rules and scam customers out of paying them

BOYCOTT William Hill !!!!! So according to William Hill. Lukas Hornicek DIDN’T save this shot from Vicenzo Grifo. Even though- 1. You can clearly see he gets fingertips to it 2. His fingers bend back AFTER touching the ball 3. The ball then slightly changes direction and goes onto the post 4. You even hear the commentators say the keeper got fingertips to it to save it onto the post They even told me if I prove it they’ll escalate it but won’t accept my video as proof 😂😂😂 Even though William Hill and most betting companies state “any shot that is touched onto the post is a shot on target” they’re denying this is a shot on target and even said “the bet wasn’t settled on video footage” I’ve sent them all the proof they need to see it’s a shot on target that the keeper touches onto the post which according to their rules is a shot on target and a save. They’ve not settled this as a save or a shot on target even though he clearly tips it onto the post. They even tried to bend their own rules saying if a keeper tips it onto the post then it’s a “shot” and not a “shot on target” which is a lie They even paid out part of the bet and said “WON” so if they’re adamant it didn’t win then why did they partly pay out ? 😂 It either won or it didn’t win. The fact they’re denying the keeper saved this has meant I didn’t win and I’ll never use them again unless this is resolved. Seen so many tweets like this recently where betting companies are ignoring factual evidence in videos to deny people of their winnings but happy enough to take money straight away off people So do not use William Hill as when you show them proof they deny it, break their own rules and scam customers out of paying them

Rangers Spares

61,718 次观看 • 2 个月前

(1/2) Meet Sebastian Balderas of Columbia University. This raging antisemite appears to work at Columbia University and graduated from the university based on his two LinkedIn profiles. His X account is full of alarming threats and hatred towards Zionists. Sebastian also seems to be a member of the pro-Hamas illegal encampment since the start with many photos and videos posted on his X account. Sebastian proudly wrote on X, “I hide and block all Zionists, i have only one thing to say to yall, the world is better without yall in it and PALESTINE WILL BE FREE” (dated April 17, 2024; day 1 of the illegal camp). This antisemite of Columbia University also routinely rips down posters of Israeli hostages. In a video that he proudly posted on X, Sebastian is confronted by a man for removing them. Sebastian responds by calling the man an IOF solider who runs over Palestinians. He calls the hostages “manufactured propaganda.”

(1/2) Meet Sebastian Balderas of Columbia University. This raging antisemite appears to work at Columbia University and graduated from the university based on his two LinkedIn profiles. His X account is full of alarming threats and hatred towards Zionists. Sebastian also seems to be a member of the pro-Hamas illegal encampment since the start with many photos and videos posted on his X account. Sebastian proudly wrote on X, “I hide and block all Zionists, i have only one thing to say to yall, the world is better without yall in it and PALESTINE WILL BE FREE” (dated April 17, 2024; day 1 of the illegal camp). This antisemite of Columbia University also routinely rips down posters of Israeli hostages. In a video that he proudly posted on X, Sebastian is confronted by a man for removing them. Sebastian responds by calling the man an IOF solider who runs over Palestinians. He calls the hostages “manufactured propaganda.”

Documenting Jew Hatred on Campus at Columbia U

300,064 次观看 • 2 年前

They love the fact that people believe the Pandemic Began from a Wuhan lab in China… Technically true where it was released, but the fact of the matter is it all began at the University of North Carolina… and they moved to the Wuhan lab. It was quite literally a Patented Biological Coronavirus Weapon Dr David Martin: (second clip) • 2002, the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill patented, “An Infectious Replication Defective Clone of Coronavirus” —— “Infections Replication Defective” means a WEAPON! —— “It means it’s meant to target an individual” • The patent was funded on work funded from NIAID— Anthony Fauci, from 1990-2002 • That patent mysteriously preceded SARS 1 by a year “We engineered SARS! SARS is not a naturally occurring phenomenon. The natural occurring phenomenon is known as the common cold….. SARS is the research developed by humans weaponizing a life system model to actually attack human beings & they patented it in 2002.” • 2003, giant surprise, the CDC filed a patent on coronavirus isolated from humans Tucker Clip David Martin Clip Full Interview Tucker

They love the fact that people believe the Pandemic Began from a Wuhan lab in China… Technically true where it was released, but the fact of the matter is it all began at the University of North Carolina… and they moved to the Wuhan lab. It was quite literally a Patented Biological Coronavirus Weapon Dr David Martin: (second clip) • 2002, the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill patented, “An Infectious Replication Defective Clone of Coronavirus” —— “Infections Replication Defective” means a WEAPON! —— “It means it’s meant to target an individual” • The patent was funded on work funded from NIAID— Anthony Fauci, from 1990-2002 • That patent mysteriously preceded SARS 1 by a year “We engineered SARS! SARS is not a naturally occurring phenomenon. The natural occurring phenomenon is known as the common cold….. SARS is the research developed by humans weaponizing a life system model to actually attack human beings & they patented it in 2002.” • 2003, giant surprise, the CDC filed a patent on coronavirus isolated from humans Tucker Clip David Martin Clip Full Interview Tucker

MJTruthUltra

87,359 次观看 • 11 个月前

🚨 Why Ivermectin Shows So Much Promise Against Cancer (But Almost No Human Trials) Ivermectin doesn’t just have one or two effects on cancer; it has over a dozen different mechanisms of action. Here are some of the key ones: - Kills cancer stem cells (the cells chemotherapy often misses) - Reverses multidrug resistance, making cancer cells more sensitive to chemotherapy again - Acts as a radiosensitizer, helping radiation work better - Inhibits angiogenesis (stops tumors from forming new blood vessels) - Blocks matrix metalloproteinases, which helps prevent cancer from spreading and metastasizing Despite hundreds of preclinical studies showing these effects, there are almost no large human trials. Only small case reports exist (for example, some leukemia patients showing remission). Why? Because Ivermectin has been off-patent since the 1990s. It’s a cheap, generic drug. When there’s no money to be made, tragically, large-scale research rarely happens, especially in oncology. This is the same story with many other repurposed drugs. Promising lab results exist, but without financial incentive, human trials rarely move forward. That’s why so many patients are now doing their own research into these options. If you're exploring Ivermectin or Fenbendazole protocols, many people are choosing clean, pharmaceutical-grade versions from PharmacyinUSA. Save this for reference. #Ivermectin #CancerResearch #RepurposedDrugs #Fenbendazole #CancerStemCells

🚨 Why Ivermectin Shows So Much Promise Against Cancer (But Almost No Human Trials) Ivermectin doesn’t just have one or two effects on cancer; it has over a dozen different mechanisms of action. Here are some of the key ones: - Kills cancer stem cells (the cells chemotherapy often misses) - Reverses multidrug resistance, making cancer cells more sensitive to chemotherapy again - Acts as a radiosensitizer, helping radiation work better - Inhibits angiogenesis (stops tumors from forming new blood vessels) - Blocks matrix metalloproteinases, which helps prevent cancer from spreading and metastasizing Despite hundreds of preclinical studies showing these effects, there are almost no large human trials. Only small case reports exist (for example, some leukemia patients showing remission). Why? Because Ivermectin has been off-patent since the 1990s. It’s a cheap, generic drug. When there’s no money to be made, tragically, large-scale research rarely happens, especially in oncology. This is the same story with many other repurposed drugs. Promising lab results exist, but without financial incentive, human trials rarely move forward. That’s why so many patients are now doing their own research into these options. If you're exploring Ivermectin or Fenbendazole protocols, many people are choosing clean, pharmaceutical-grade versions from PharmacyinUSA. Save this for reference. #Ivermectin #CancerResearch #RepurposedDrugs #Fenbendazole #CancerStemCells

PharmacyinUSA

11,650 次观看 • 11 天前

Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong Unveils the Mechanism of Vaccine & COVID-Induced Autoimmunity and Announces a Potential Path to Treatment A groundbreaking explanation from Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong on how COVID-19 and its vaccines can trigger autoimmune issues, and the pioneering science being deployed to reverse the damage. 1/ The fundamental problem, as detailed by Dr. Soon-Shiong, is that current vaccines do not clear the virus. They may block initial infection, but the virus can still enter cells, leading to a persistent and hidden problem. 2/ This persistence is now scientifically proven. Research funded by Dr. Soon-Shiong at UCSF, and confirmed by Harvard, shows the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein can linger in the body's cells and even circulate in the bloodstream long after the initial infection or vaccination. 3/ This creates a perfect storm. The body recognizes this persistent spike protein—an "abnormal" antigen—as a threat and mounts a continuous immune response, creating antibodies that can mistakenly attack the body's own tissues. This is the onset of autoimmune disease. 4/ Dr. Soon-Shiong identifies a "triple whammy" that paves the way for severe long-term health issues: • Persistence of the spike protein & viral RNA. • Chronic inflammation from the constant immune response. • Loss of P53, a critical guardian protein that protects against cancer. 5/ This combination is a prelude not only to autoimmune disorders but also to cancer and neurological symptoms like brain fog. It is the core pathology behind Long COVID and post-vaccine syndrome. 6/ But there is hope. The answer, he states, is not to suppress the immune system further, but to empower it. The solution lies in upregulating the body's natural assassins—NK cells and T cells—to finally seek out and clear the body of these infected, spike-protein-producing cells. 7/ To this end, Dr. Soon-Shiong announces a major clinical trial opening within weeks. This trial will focus on treating Long COVID by targeting and eliminating the persistent viral reservoir, offering a potential cure for those suffering from post-COVID and post-vaccine autoimmune conditions. This is not just management. This is the science of clearance and restoration.

Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong Unveils the Mechanism of Vaccine & COVID-Induced Autoimmunity and Announces a Potential Path to Treatment A groundbreaking explanation from Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong on how COVID-19 and its vaccines can trigger autoimmune issues, and the pioneering science being deployed to reverse the damage. 1/ The fundamental problem, as detailed by Dr. Soon-Shiong, is that current vaccines do not clear the virus. They may block initial infection, but the virus can still enter cells, leading to a persistent and hidden problem. 2/ This persistence is now scientifically proven. Research funded by Dr. Soon-Shiong at UCSF, and confirmed by Harvard, shows the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein can linger in the body's cells and even circulate in the bloodstream long after the initial infection or vaccination. 3/ This creates a perfect storm. The body recognizes this persistent spike protein—an "abnormal" antigen—as a threat and mounts a continuous immune response, creating antibodies that can mistakenly attack the body's own tissues. This is the onset of autoimmune disease. 4/ Dr. Soon-Shiong identifies a "triple whammy" that paves the way for severe long-term health issues: • Persistence of the spike protein & viral RNA. • Chronic inflammation from the constant immune response. • Loss of P53, a critical guardian protein that protects against cancer. 5/ This combination is a prelude not only to autoimmune disorders but also to cancer and neurological symptoms like brain fog. It is the core pathology behind Long COVID and post-vaccine syndrome. 6/ But there is hope. The answer, he states, is not to suppress the immune system further, but to empower it. The solution lies in upregulating the body's natural assassins—NK cells and T cells—to finally seek out and clear the body of these infected, spike-protein-producing cells. 7/ To this end, Dr. Soon-Shiong announces a major clinical trial opening within weeks. This trial will focus on treating Long COVID by targeting and eliminating the persistent viral reservoir, offering a potential cure for those suffering from post-COVID and post-vaccine autoimmune conditions. This is not just management. This is the science of clearance and restoration.

Camus

41,604 次观看 • 11 个月前

🚨🚨 EPIC Paul Offit takedown! PLEASE LIKE AND SHARE WIDELY! A point by point analysis of the false claims and lies he presented as scientific fact in his infamous 2024 "DNA fragments in COVID vaccines are completely harmless" video: LIE #1: The mRNA vaccines contain fragments of DNA, but these are in very small quantities, measured in nanograms - Counterargument: Even though the DNA fragments may be in small quantities, their presence still poses a risk. DNA integration into the genome, even in small quantities, could still have long-term, unpredictable effects that we are not yet fully aware of. LIE #2: Impossibility of DNA entering human DNA: For these DNA fragments to integrate into our DNA, they would have to overcome several barriers, including crossing the cytoplasm and nuclear membrane, which is virtually impossible - Counterargument: The entire purpose of the LNP (lipid nanoparticle) in mRNA vaccines is to allow for the mRNA to enter the cytoplasm in order to transcribe the desired proteins. While fragments integrating into human DNA might be low, it's not "impossible." Scientific literature on gene editing technologies, like CRISPR, demonstrates that foreign DNA can be integrated into the genome under certain conditions. LIE #3: Role of innate immune system in rejecting foreign DNA: The innate immune system and enzymes in the cytoplasm work to destroy foreign DNA - Counterargument: While our immune system does recognize and destroy some foreign DNA, the immune response isn't perfect, especially if the foreign DNA is introduced in a manner that is not immediately recognized such as via the LNP. In certain environments or under specific conditions, foreign DNA can evade immune detection. LIE #4: Lack of integrases in mRNA vaccine DNA: The DNA fragments in the mRNA vaccine do not have the necessary integrases to integrate into our genome - Counterargument: While the fragments might lack integrases, it's possible that they could still interact with the genome in other ways, for example, through epigenetic changes or by influencing gene expression as is commonly achieved in laboratory settings. LIE #5: Comparison to naturally occurring foreign DNA: We are constantly exposed to foreign DNA through our food from bacteria, plants, and animals, which is much larger and more abundant than the DNA in vaccines - Counterargument: Although we are exposed to foreign DNA regularly through the digestive tract, the introduction of DNA through vaccination is a more controlled and concentrated process. The body is not naturally prepared to deal with such DNA in the same way it handles the ingestion of plant or animal DNA. LIE #6: Fear-mongering accusation: The physician scientist who raised these concerns was just scaring people unnecessarily - Counterargument: Raising concerns about potential risks is an important part of scientific discourse, especially when it comes to public health. It's better to err on the side of caution and investigate these possibilities rather than dismissing concerns outright, especially when the long-term effects of mRNA vaccines are still being studied. LIE #7: Assurance that these risks are negligible: The DNA fragments from the vaccines are clinically harmless - Counterargument: The assertion that these fragments are harmless is premature. Without long-term studies specifically addressing the potential risks of vaccine-derived DNA integration, it's impossible to claim with certainty that there will be no adverse effects in the future. Paul Offit knows all of this, so WHY IS HE LYING TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC? Please share this important video with everyone you know and DEMAND TRANSPARENT RESEARCH INTO THE QUESTION OF DNA CONTAMINATION AND INTEGRATION IN THE #COVID #vaccinated POPULATION! @P_J_Buckhaults Kevin McKernan Danny Jones Bret Weinstein Vejon Health - Dr Philip McMillan John Campbell Robert F. Kennedy Jr Steve Kirsch #AwfulOffit

🚨🚨 EPIC Paul Offit takedown! PLEASE LIKE AND SHARE WIDELY! A point by point analysis of the false claims and lies he presented as scientific fact in his infamous 2024 "DNA fragments in COVID vaccines are completely harmless" video: LIE #1: The mRNA vaccines contain fragments of DNA, but these are in very small quantities, measured in nanograms - Counterargument: Even though the DNA fragments may be in small quantities, their presence still poses a risk. DNA integration into the genome, even in small quantities, could still have long-term, unpredictable effects that we are not yet fully aware of. LIE #2: Impossibility of DNA entering human DNA: For these DNA fragments to integrate into our DNA, they would have to overcome several barriers, including crossing the cytoplasm and nuclear membrane, which is virtually impossible - Counterargument: The entire purpose of the LNP (lipid nanoparticle) in mRNA vaccines is to allow for the mRNA to enter the cytoplasm in order to transcribe the desired proteins. While fragments integrating into human DNA might be low, it's not "impossible." Scientific literature on gene editing technologies, like CRISPR, demonstrates that foreign DNA can be integrated into the genome under certain conditions. LIE #3: Role of innate immune system in rejecting foreign DNA: The innate immune system and enzymes in the cytoplasm work to destroy foreign DNA - Counterargument: While our immune system does recognize and destroy some foreign DNA, the immune response isn't perfect, especially if the foreign DNA is introduced in a manner that is not immediately recognized such as via the LNP. In certain environments or under specific conditions, foreign DNA can evade immune detection. LIE #4: Lack of integrases in mRNA vaccine DNA: The DNA fragments in the mRNA vaccine do not have the necessary integrases to integrate into our genome - Counterargument: While the fragments might lack integrases, it's possible that they could still interact with the genome in other ways, for example, through epigenetic changes or by influencing gene expression as is commonly achieved in laboratory settings. LIE #5: Comparison to naturally occurring foreign DNA: We are constantly exposed to foreign DNA through our food from bacteria, plants, and animals, which is much larger and more abundant than the DNA in vaccines - Counterargument: Although we are exposed to foreign DNA regularly through the digestive tract, the introduction of DNA through vaccination is a more controlled and concentrated process. The body is not naturally prepared to deal with such DNA in the same way it handles the ingestion of plant or animal DNA. LIE #6: Fear-mongering accusation: The physician scientist who raised these concerns was just scaring people unnecessarily - Counterargument: Raising concerns about potential risks is an important part of scientific discourse, especially when it comes to public health. It's better to err on the side of caution and investigate these possibilities rather than dismissing concerns outright, especially when the long-term effects of mRNA vaccines are still being studied. LIE #7: Assurance that these risks are negligible: The DNA fragments from the vaccines are clinically harmless - Counterargument: The assertion that these fragments are harmless is premature. Without long-term studies specifically addressing the potential risks of vaccine-derived DNA integration, it's impossible to claim with certainty that there will be no adverse effects in the future. Paul Offit knows all of this, so WHY IS HE LYING TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC? Please share this important video with everyone you know and DEMAND TRANSPARENT RESEARCH INTO THE QUESTION OF DNA CONTAMINATION AND INTEGRATION IN THE #COVID #vaccinated POPULATION! @P_J_Buckhaults Kevin McKernan Danny Jones Bret Weinstein Vejon Health - Dr Philip McMillan John Campbell Robert F. Kennedy Jr Steve Kirsch #AwfulOffit

Vaccine Safety Research Foundation

338,876 次观看 • 1 年前