正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

The problem is not Chinese investment in European infrastructure. The problem is private ownership of critical infrastructure. It should be maintained in the hands of sovereign states, under public ownership for the benefit of the people rather than the profits of the few.

65,382 次观看 • 3 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

Vide-O 的头像
Vide-O3 年前

Fully agree again (shocker!). Thanks for clearing up the facts and for trying to get accountability from the EU. Unfortunately “responsibility” is not a word known to them.

Geraldo 🇧🇷 的头像
Geraldo 🇧🇷3 年前

PREACH 🗨️👄 Clair! It is a pleasure to have at least a few saying it right at the EU parliament.

Jon Starbux 的头像
Jon Starbux3 年前

This. About a thousand times. No private entity should own water.

duplicitousdemocracy 的头像
duplicitousdemocracy3 年前

You consistently point out the facts that really matter. While we are being told our demise and hardship are for 'everyone's benefit' (read top 1%), you logically dismantle the flimsy reasoning they use. Privatisation has been a disaster for ordinary people.

AlE.Katt 的头像
AlE.Katt3 年前

Thanks Clare Daly, financial privatisation is neoliberalism’s austerity-driven ‘own-goal’. It brings on neo-feudalism, and Europeans should remember its implications. “Well said” to ye!

1+1 hosted by Youri Smouter (sometimes Yuri) 的头像
1+1 hosted by Youri Smouter (sometimes Yuri)3 年前

@irelandcp OXO! Tanks Clare for pushing back against Sinophobia but in general being a voice of reason on all things anti-imperialism and what not. an endangered species and thanks so much.

DC 的头像
DC3 年前

More Marxist drivel

Yuliana Dlugaj 🇷🇺🇨🇳🇰🇵 的头像
Yuliana Dlugaj 🇷🇺🇨🇳🇰🇵3 年前

👏👏👏

Kadir Yavuz 的头像
Kadir Yavuz3 年前

Very super super super very very civilized European democracy!! There are only 2 truly different, honest political voices out of 751 MPs. And those who are responsible for solving problems cannot bear to listen to them. A fart civilization built on lies.

Humza’s rock hard nipples. 的头像
Humza’s rock hard nipples.3 年前

Start working on your CV urgently.

相关视频

Andy Burnham says Britain is paying too much for the basics and promises “more public control” over water, energy and transport. That sounds fine until you remember one rather important fact. The price of water and electricity is already controlled by the state. Ofgem sets the energy price cap. Ofwat sets price controls for water companies. Regulators already decide what private monopoly utilities are allowed to charge, what returns they can make, what investment plans they can claim for, and how much of the burden gets pushed onto households and businesses. So what exactly does “more public control” mean? Because if Burnham means more regulation, we have already tried that. It has failed. Bills are still too high, rivers are still polluted, infrastructure is still creaking, and private investors are still extracting from assets the public cannot live without. The problem is not a lack of public control. The problem is ownership. You cannot properly control a monopoly utility while leaving the monopoly in private hands and pretending the regulator is a substitute for democracy. This is where Burnham’s fiscal confusion matters too. He talks about giving people breathing space, but refuses to say the obvious: a sovereign government is not a household. Within the real limits of labour, materials, energy, skills and inflation, Britain can build and own what it needs. The real fiscal rule should be simple. If the public pays, the public owns. Not “public control” while private firms keep the pipes, cables, profits and ransom note. Public ownership. Public investment. Public accountability. Anything less is just the same failed model wearing a northern accent. #weownit #andy

The Heartlands Tribune

27,700 次观看 • 1 个月前