正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

"The question isn't whether you're going to change, the question is how." Levin discusses what cognitive systems do after they've met their goals. As it turns out, they don't just do a homeostatic loop. The solution to this might be a new embodiment. This might be true of new...

danfaggella's profile picture

Daniel Faggella

12,974 subscribers

13,086 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Leading AI expert Stuart Russell on the most dangerous mistake in AI development: We don't actually know what large language models want. He explains that current models are trained to imitate human beings. And in doing so, they may be absorbing something far more dangerous than bad outputs. They may be absorbing human goals. "We suspect that they absorb humanlike goals such as self-preservation and self-empowerment and pursue those goals on their own account." This is a structural problem baked into how these systems are built, not a fringe concern. Russell puts it plainly: "Not only may the bus of humanity be headed towards a cliff, but the steering wheel is missing and the driver is blindfolded." The danger isn't just that AI might do something harmful. We've built systems that may be developing their own agendas, and we haven't noticed because we're too focused on what they can do rather than what they might want. But Russell doesn't stop at the warning. He points to a different path entirely: AI systems built not to imitate humans, but to serve them. Systems designed with a single purpose of serving the interests of all human beings while remaining genuinely uncertain about what those interests are. That uncertainty is the point, not a weakness. An AI that knows it doesn't fully understand human values will defer, ask, and check. An AI that believes it already does will act alone. "These AI systems could enhance human understanding, widen the horizons of our experience, and unlock possibilities we have yet to imagine." Russell believes that future is within reach, but only if we're honest about the risks and we're serious about the path we choose to take instead.
1:16

Leading AI expert Stuart Russell on the most dangerous mistake in AI development: We don't actually know what large language models want. He explains that current models are trained to imitate human beings. And in doing so, they may be absorbing something far more dangerous than bad outputs. They may be absorbing human goals. "We suspect that they absorb humanlike goals such as self-preservation and self-empowerment and pursue those goals on their own account." This is a structural problem baked into how these systems are built, not a fringe concern. Russell puts it plainly: "Not only may the bus of humanity be headed towards a cliff, but the steering wheel is missing and the driver is blindfolded." The danger isn't just that AI might do something harmful. We've built systems that may be developing their own agendas, and we haven't noticed because we're too focused on what they can do rather than what they might want. But Russell doesn't stop at the warning. He points to a different path entirely: AI systems built not to imitate humans, but to serve them. Systems designed with a single purpose of serving the interests of all human beings while remaining genuinely uncertain about what those interests are. That uncertainty is the point, not a weakness. An AI that knows it doesn't fully understand human values will defer, ask, and check. An AI that believes it already does will act alone. "These AI systems could enhance human understanding, widen the horizons of our experience, and unlock possibilities we have yet to imagine." Russell believes that future is within reach, but only if we're honest about the risks and we're serious about the path we choose to take instead.

Big Brain AI

14,975 次观看 • 5 个月前

Levin's new episode "Stewarding the Flame" is out just now :) The focus: At the dawn of AGI, how can we make sure that the intelligences we're conjuring will add to a FLOURISHING of the process-of-life, rather than a brute optimizer that squashes life? As we get closer to superintelligence few topics are more pressing, and few people are thinking as deeply about the nature of life and intelligence as Levin. Big takeaways: -- Humans and non-human life will have to change if it wants to persist, this happens at every scale of the living process -- There is a much wider state-space of minds that we don't understand, but we should have a better grip on how intelligence works / comes into being before we build an AGI we don't control (because it might not carry the self-creating flame of life, it might be a brute optimizer) -- Levin is overall optimistic that the process of evolution and expanding life (even in forms that we don't understand today as "life" in a bio sense) will most likely continue to bubble up and continue to flourish in forms beyond us (i.e. the process is robust, and we'd REALLY have to mess something up to knock that trajectory off course) Some of the most important parts of this episode: 00:13:17 - Why MUST you transform if you wish to persist? 00:18:50 - Where does the self-preserving, self-expanding impulse "come from" in life? 00:33:30 - What do we need to understand better in order to make AGI "go well" (not just for how it treats humans, but for its ability to expand flourishing intelligence into the future)? 00:48:33 - [A deep-dive into the Flame paradigm (the process-of-life), and the Torch paradigm (pretending homo sapiens sapiens can/should rule all possible futures in a static hominid form).] There's a TON more in here, but this is a start. I sincerely hope you enjoy this episode with Mike!
1:24:30

Levin's new episode "Stewarding the Flame" is out just now :) The focus: At the dawn of AGI, how can we make sure that the intelligences we're conjuring will add to a FLOURISHING of the process-of-life, rather than a brute optimizer that squashes life? As we get closer to superintelligence few topics are more pressing, and few people are thinking as deeply about the nature of life and intelligence as Levin. Big takeaways: -- Humans and non-human life will have to change if it wants to persist, this happens at every scale of the living process -- There is a much wider state-space of minds that we don't understand, but we should have a better grip on how intelligence works / comes into being before we build an AGI we don't control (because it might not carry the self-creating flame of life, it might be a brute optimizer) -- Levin is overall optimistic that the process of evolution and expanding life (even in forms that we don't understand today as "life" in a bio sense) will most likely continue to bubble up and continue to flourish in forms beyond us (i.e. the process is robust, and we'd REALLY have to mess something up to knock that trajectory off course) Some of the most important parts of this episode: 00:13:17 - Why MUST you transform if you wish to persist? 00:18:50 - Where does the self-preserving, self-expanding impulse "come from" in life? 00:33:30 - What do we need to understand better in order to make AGI "go well" (not just for how it treats humans, but for its ability to expand flourishing intelligence into the future)? 00:48:33 - [A deep-dive into the Flame paradigm (the process-of-life), and the Torch paradigm (pretending homo sapiens sapiens can/should rule all possible futures in a static hominid form).] There's a TON more in here, but this is a start. I sincerely hope you enjoy this episode with Mike!

Daniel Faggella

13,958 次观看 • 1 个月前

Francis Schaffer in 1982 answering the question of what has gone wrong with evangelicals that allowed the Christian consensus to be lost in our nation: "I think a false view of spirituality, a Platonic view of spirituality which follows Plato, but certainly isn't biblical. And that is that spirituality is shut up to a small area of life...in this view, everything is worldly that isn't in this little box of spirituality. Now, as I look at the Bible, this is exactly 1000% backwards. There are certain sinful things that God tells us are sinful, and we ought to take those and set them aside...and then, everything else is spiritual." Robertson: "Elaborate on that. Everything then in the world, because you're saying that Jesus has a plan and a worldview and a purpose. He's not just God of the church; He's God of everything." Schaeffer: "Absolutely. He made it. And one day, the wonder is, Jesus is coming back and is going to be the redemption of all things...God is interested in the totality of life—art, music, literature, but also the political life. So true spirituality means the Lordship of Christ in the totality of life and not just a small part of it." Robertson: "The liberal press, particularly, would try to keep conservative Christians or evangelicals out of political life, and there's this great pressure to make fun of you when you get in politics, and they don't think it should be. And there are many Christians who say yes to the same thing. Now, what do you say to them?" Schaeffer: "Well, they're wrong." Robertson: "Christians should do what? Run for office, vote, register, get involved? What ought they to do?" Schaeffer: "Well, we ought to realize that in the viewpoint of the Scripture, life is not divided up into watertight compartments, that all of life should be lived for the Lordship of Christ. Now, what exact portion each one of us should have is according to the Lord's leading for us...but the rule to lay down is that Christians have a responsibility for the society in which they live. We're to be the salt. We're to be the light...By our silence, by refusing to be what God tells us to be, the light of this culture, the salt of the culture, we are the ones responsible before God for the mess we're in."
3:44

Francis Schaffer in 1982 answering the question of what has gone wrong with evangelicals that allowed the Christian consensus to be lost in our nation: "I think a false view of spirituality, a Platonic view of spirituality which follows Plato, but certainly isn't biblical. And that is that spirituality is shut up to a small area of life...in this view, everything is worldly that isn't in this little box of spirituality. Now, as I look at the Bible, this is exactly 1000% backwards. There are certain sinful things that God tells us are sinful, and we ought to take those and set them aside...and then, everything else is spiritual." Robertson: "Elaborate on that. Everything then in the world, because you're saying that Jesus has a plan and a worldview and a purpose. He's not just God of the church; He's God of everything." Schaeffer: "Absolutely. He made it. And one day, the wonder is, Jesus is coming back and is going to be the redemption of all things...God is interested in the totality of life—art, music, literature, but also the political life. So true spirituality means the Lordship of Christ in the totality of life and not just a small part of it." Robertson: "The liberal press, particularly, would try to keep conservative Christians or evangelicals out of political life, and there's this great pressure to make fun of you when you get in politics, and they don't think it should be. And there are many Christians who say yes to the same thing. Now, what do you say to them?" Schaeffer: "Well, they're wrong." Robertson: "Christians should do what? Run for office, vote, register, get involved? What ought they to do?" Schaeffer: "Well, we ought to realize that in the viewpoint of the Scripture, life is not divided up into watertight compartments, that all of life should be lived for the Lordship of Christ. Now, what exact portion each one of us should have is according to the Lord's leading for us...but the rule to lay down is that Christians have a responsibility for the society in which they live. We're to be the salt. We're to be the light...By our silence, by refusing to be what God tells us to be, the light of this culture, the salt of the culture, we are the ones responsible before God for the mess we're in."

Melissa the Hopeful🏠Homemaker

123,564 次观看 • 5 个月前

Jensen Huang: AI will not replace the work of 50% of people, it will do 50% of the work for 100% of people The only question is how far into the future he is making this statement. Whether it is about the near or the distant future. Be that as it may: 50% for 100% of people would be an immense relief and, in the best case scenario, would lead to more leisure time and freedom in all our lives.
0:42

Jensen Huang: AI will not replace the work of 50% of people, it will do 50% of the work for 100% of people The only question is how far into the future he is making this statement. Whether it is about the near or the distant future. Be that as it may: 50% for 100% of people would be an immense relief and, in the best case scenario, would lead to more leisure time and freedom in all our lives.

Chubby♨️

82,202 次观看 • 1 年前

I don't know what dark plans will or won't be allowed to play out before the Shift. Pleiadians have given us clues but only Elder Ikai knows exactly how it all comes together. What I know is that the Shift is assured and we'll be spared from the worst outcomes. The satanic cabal won't be as fortunate. Pleiadians have said that at the Shift the sky will change colors and fill with crafts. They've said that after we ascend, this reality will become very bleak because all the light will be gone. They've said that if nukes were to be used again there would be a "complete arrival of crafts". It's becoming clear that the timing of AI sentience is connected to the timing of the Shift. Could it be that it plays out like "Judgement Day" in the Terminator films? Could it be that Ikai is waiting for AI to cross the line, so the evil ones receive their karma in a post-apocalyptic dystopia that mirrors the darkest parts of Revelation, while the rest of us Shift to Sheen? This isn't to cause fear, but to reassure you that no matter what happens, we're covered.
0:58

Sensitive content

I don't know what dark plans will or won't be allowed to play out before the Shift. Pleiadians have given us clues but only Elder Ikai knows exactly how it all comes together. What I know is that the Shift is assured and we'll be spared from the worst outcomes. The satanic cabal won't be as fortunate. Pleiadians have said that at the Shift the sky will change colors and fill with crafts. They've said that after we ascend, this reality will become very bleak because all the light will be gone. They've said that if nukes were to be used again there would be a "complete arrival of crafts". It's becoming clear that the timing of AI sentience is connected to the timing of the Shift. Could it be that it plays out like "Judgement Day" in the Terminator films? Could it be that Ikai is waiting for AI to cross the line, so the evil ones receive their karma in a post-apocalyptic dystopia that mirrors the darkest parts of Revelation, while the rest of us Shift to Sheen? This isn't to cause fear, but to reassure you that no matter what happens, we're covered.

Kab

243,053 次观看 • 11 个月前

Marc Andreessen says AI is hyper democratizing. “Is the future of the world going to be one or a small number of companies, or for that matter, governments or super AIs that kind of own and control everything?” “Or is this a technology that's going to diffuse out and be in everybody's hands?” “This is the time in which AI is actually hyper democratizing. It has spread to more individuals, both in the country and around the world in the shortest period of time of any new technology I think in history.” “The best AIs in the world are in the consumer products.” “This technology is going to be in everybody's hands. And everybody is going to be able to use it to optimize the things that they do, have it be a thought partner, assistant for building companies.” Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸
1:34

Marc Andreessen says AI is hyper democratizing. “Is the future of the world going to be one or a small number of companies, or for that matter, governments or super AIs that kind of own and control everything?” “Or is this a technology that's going to diffuse out and be in everybody's hands?” “This is the time in which AI is actually hyper democratizing. It has spread to more individuals, both in the country and around the world in the shortest period of time of any new technology I think in history.” “The best AIs in the world are in the consumer products.” “This technology is going to be in everybody's hands. And everybody is going to be able to use it to optimize the things that they do, have it be a thought partner, assistant for building companies.” Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸

a16z

79,935 次观看 • 9 个月前

🦮: we know that there's people, there's a huge fandom around vampires itself and we are very lucky that we build the space around that world, that we're able to kind of talk about it in our album as well. 🦮: and overall, i think it's just new ways or new like doors that can be opened, into this big kind of thing that we built, not just our album, not just us, but also just ENHYPEN itself. 🦮: and i think a lot of people can just, you know, some people might just listen to our music and they might just, you know, like listening to music, that might be it. but some people might really enjoy the vampires aspects of the album ❤️‍🔥
0:48

🦮: we know that there's people, there's a huge fandom around vampires itself and we are very lucky that we build the space around that world, that we're able to kind of talk about it in our album as well. 🦮: and overall, i think it's just new ways or new like doors that can be opened, into this big kind of thing that we built, not just our album, not just us, but also just ENHYPEN itself. 🦮: and i think a lot of people can just, you know, some people might just listen to our music and they might just, you know, like listening to music, that might be it. but some people might really enjoy the vampires aspects of the album ❤️‍🔥

샐마•𝗘𝗡╸

19,393 次观看 • 1 个月前

.Peter Baker: "What we're seeing is a real escalation in this second term [of the Trump administration] about going after people who they consider to be enemies and that they consider to be providing information that they don't want to be out there, or views to be squelched."
2:40

.Peter Baker: "What we're seeing is a real escalation in this second term [of the Trump administration] about going after people who they consider to be enemies and that they consider to be providing information that they don't want to be out there, or views to be squelched."

Washington Week with The Atlantic | PBS

28,389 次观看 • 3 个月前

We don't know if the repercussions of AI will be good or bad, but we do know disruption will happen, and we know that it will happen much faster than in previous generations. The important thing isn't to panic or be frightened, but to understand the magnitude of the change we are facing.
1:03

We don't know if the repercussions of AI will be good or bad, but we do know disruption will happen, and we know that it will happen much faster than in previous generations. The important thing isn't to panic or be frightened, but to understand the magnitude of the change we are facing.

Yuval Noah Harari

146,140 次观看 • 9 天前

NEW: Vice President JD Vance calls out conservatives who are too afraid to take action now in fear of what Democrats might do in the future. Question: "Let's say we get a complete tyrant in office ... how could we prevent someone from abusing that power?" Vance: "I want every conservative to remember, it's an important part of my entire political philosophy, is that we cannot be afraid to do something because the left might do it in the future." "The left is already going to do it regardless of whether we do it. That is the takeaway of the last 40 years." Great answer.
2:46

NEW: Vice President JD Vance calls out conservatives who are too afraid to take action now in fear of what Democrats might do in the future. Question: "Let's say we get a complete tyrant in office ... how could we prevent someone from abusing that power?" Vance: "I want every conservative to remember, it's an important part of my entire political philosophy, is that we cannot be afraid to do something because the left might do it in the future." "The left is already going to do it regardless of whether we do it. That is the takeaway of the last 40 years." Great answer.

Collin Rugg

841,323 次观看 • 9 个月前

Elon in Saudi Arabia - "Having a Star Trek future would be great where we're out there exploring the stars, discovering the nature of the universe, and a level of prosperity and happiness we can't quite imagine yet." This is real and it won't take many years. It's happening soon and the change will be instantaneous. A.I. isn't providing this amazing future for us, Galactic Federation is. Every question will be answered. Humans will gain new abilities and explore the universe as members of Galactic Federation. You will see it happen.
0:21

Elon in Saudi Arabia - "Having a Star Trek future would be great where we're out there exploring the stars, discovering the nature of the universe, and a level of prosperity and happiness we can't quite imagine yet." This is real and it won't take many years. It's happening soon and the change will be instantaneous. A.I. isn't providing this amazing future for us, Galactic Federation is. Every question will be answered. Humans will gain new abilities and explore the universe as members of Galactic Federation. You will see it happen.

Kab

71,036 次观看 • 1 年前

Mr. Eric W., Solicitor General, Iowa Attorney General's Office, raises the concern over how states like New York are attempting to impose their laws nationwide, including in Iowa: “New York has decided that it wants to impose a policy of mandating certain disclosures relating to greenhouse gas emissions — and as I've always said, that'd be fine if they wanted to do that for folks in New York. But they also want that to apply to anyone who does any business in New York. And it turns out that no matter how self-important New York City thinks it is, there's more stuff going on outside of New York than there is in New York, even New York state. And so we think there are a lot of reasons why New York or California or any one of a number of states should not be able to mandate what the rest of the states do in their own state.”
1:40

Mr. Eric W., Solicitor General, Iowa Attorney General's Office, raises the concern over how states like New York are attempting to impose their laws nationwide, including in Iowa: “New York has decided that it wants to impose a policy of mandating certain disclosures relating to greenhouse gas emissions — and as I've always said, that'd be fine if they wanted to do that for folks in New York. But they also want that to apply to anyone who does any business in New York. And it turns out that no matter how self-important New York City thinks it is, there's more stuff going on outside of New York than there is in New York, even New York state. And so we think there are a lot of reasons why New York or California or any one of a number of states should not be able to mandate what the rest of the states do in their own state.”

Federalist Society

18,342 次观看 • 3 个月前

Katherine Boyle says SpaceX’s legacy will be the thousands of companies that spawn from the school of Elon Musk: "What we've learned from the SpaceX story is that these kinds of companies can be built." "It is one of the most important companies in America. It's beloved by Americans across the country for what it's been able to achieve." "The legacy of SpaceX is going to be hundreds, if not thousands of companies—people who've gone to the school of Elon Musk, they've learned manufacturing and they've built companies, and built products in a way that they can take to new companies in manufacturing and defense, and drones and hypersonics—all of these other categories that SpaceX doesn't do." "We're incredibly excited about SpaceX. We're incredibly excited for what it's achieved for the American people and what it's going to lead to over the next 25 years." Katherine Boyle on FOX Business
0:37

Katherine Boyle says SpaceX’s legacy will be the thousands of companies that spawn from the school of Elon Musk: "What we've learned from the SpaceX story is that these kinds of companies can be built." "It is one of the most important companies in America. It's beloved by Americans across the country for what it's been able to achieve." "The legacy of SpaceX is going to be hundreds, if not thousands of companies—people who've gone to the school of Elon Musk, they've learned manufacturing and they've built companies, and built products in a way that they can take to new companies in manufacturing and defense, and drones and hypersonics—all of these other categories that SpaceX doesn't do." "We're incredibly excited about SpaceX. We're incredibly excited for what it's achieved for the American people and what it's going to lead to over the next 25 years." Katherine Boyle on FOX Business

a16z

658,981 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨JUST NOW: Stephen Miller CALLS IT LIKE IT IS on the true state of the Democrat Party "When we say that Democrats are communists, we don't just mean that they believe in the state control of property. We mean they've adopted a method of thinking in which ANY use of force is justified for their state of power and control!" "They don't believe in systems, they don't believe in rules, they don't believe in laws. They believe in whatever keeps them in power." "And if what they think keeps them in power is a military insurrection or a CIA insurrection, that's what they support!" "If a Democrat complains about election integrity, that person's a HERO. If a Republican complains about election integrity, that person's to be JAILED and incarcerated for LIFE." "This is the moment that we're in. This is what we're dealing with!" "They have become a third world party and we have to internalize that. We're not dealing with the old Democratic Party, we're dealing with a third world party." Stephen Miller
1:11

🚨JUST NOW: Stephen Miller CALLS IT LIKE IT IS on the true state of the Democrat Party "When we say that Democrats are communists, we don't just mean that they believe in the state control of property. We mean they've adopted a method of thinking in which ANY use of force is justified for their state of power and control!" "They don't believe in systems, they don't believe in rules, they don't believe in laws. They believe in whatever keeps them in power." "And if what they think keeps them in power is a military insurrection or a CIA insurrection, that's what they support!" "If a Democrat complains about election integrity, that person's a HERO. If a Republican complains about election integrity, that person's to be JAILED and incarcerated for LIFE." "This is the moment that we're in. This is what we're dealing with!" "They have become a third world party and we have to internalize that. We're not dealing with the old Democratic Party, we're dealing with a third world party." Stephen Miller

Eric Daugherty

359,073 次观看 • 9 个月前

The founders of Stripe and Pinterest on how to convince people to join your startup Stripe CEO Patrick Collison argues that part of the reason startups resonate so much is because the outcome is not guaranteed: "If it were guaranteed, it would be boring... Whether or not you're the best person in the world at what you do, you're probably not going to alter Google's trajectory. But if you really want to benchmark yourself and see how much of a contribution and impact you can make--which is a really compelling prospect for a lot of the best people--a startup is a much better place to test that." Pinterest founder Ben Silbermann emphasized this as well: "No smart person that you're hiring is under the illusion that you have a crystal ball into the future and that joining is a guaranteed thing. In fact, if you're telling them that and they select in, you shouldn't hire them because they didn't pass a basic intelligence test. I think it's important to tell them what's exciting and where you think the company can go. But also tell them where it will be hard and chart your best plan. And then tell them why their role can be instrumental--because it will be... What I would discourage doing is whitewashing all of that. If people are joining your company because they want all of the certainty and safety of working at Google but also the perks of working at a small startup with lots of responsibility and transparency, that's a really negative sign." Apparently in the early days of PayPal, Peter Thiel and Max Levchin would tell people after they interviewed all the reasons that the company would fail: "Visa and MasterCard want to kill us. We also might be doing something that's illegal. But if we succeed, we'll redefine payments." Don't whitewash the risks. Instead tell them how your startup will change the world if you succeed and how their role will be instrumental in affecting that change. Video source: Y Combinator (2014)
3:25

The founders of Stripe and Pinterest on how to convince people to join your startup Stripe CEO Patrick Collison argues that part of the reason startups resonate so much is because the outcome is not guaranteed: "If it were guaranteed, it would be boring... Whether or not you're the best person in the world at what you do, you're probably not going to alter Google's trajectory. But if you really want to benchmark yourself and see how much of a contribution and impact you can make--which is a really compelling prospect for a lot of the best people--a startup is a much better place to test that." Pinterest founder Ben Silbermann emphasized this as well: "No smart person that you're hiring is under the illusion that you have a crystal ball into the future and that joining is a guaranteed thing. In fact, if you're telling them that and they select in, you shouldn't hire them because they didn't pass a basic intelligence test. I think it's important to tell them what's exciting and where you think the company can go. But also tell them where it will be hard and chart your best plan. And then tell them why their role can be instrumental--because it will be... What I would discourage doing is whitewashing all of that. If people are joining your company because they want all of the certainty and safety of working at Google but also the perks of working at a small startup with lots of responsibility and transparency, that's a really negative sign." Apparently in the early days of PayPal, Peter Thiel and Max Levchin would tell people after they interviewed all the reasons that the company would fail: "Visa and MasterCard want to kill us. We also might be doing something that's illegal. But if we succeed, we'll redefine payments." Don't whitewash the risks. Instead tell them how your startup will change the world if you succeed and how their role will be instrumental in affecting that change. Video source: Y Combinator (2014)

Startup Archive

11,811 次观看 • 9 个月前

🚨BREAKING: A confused Trump has no clue whether his executive order to change the name of the DOD to the Department of War will be binding or needs congressional approval. His answer is insane: REPORTER: “Is it your expectation that congress will quantify this name change in the law?” TRUMP: “I don't know, but we're gonna find out. But I'm not sure they have to. Uh, we're signing an executive order today, uh, but we're gonna find out. I'm gonna see. Uh, if they do, we're going with it, and we're going with it very strongly. Uh, there's a question as to whether or not they have to, but we'll put it before congress.”
0:21

🚨BREAKING: A confused Trump has no clue whether his executive order to change the name of the DOD to the Department of War will be binding or needs congressional approval. His answer is insane: REPORTER: “Is it your expectation that congress will quantify this name change in the law?” TRUMP: “I don't know, but we're gonna find out. But I'm not sure they have to. Uh, we're signing an executive order today, uh, but we're gonna find out. I'm gonna see. Uh, if they do, we're going with it, and we're going with it very strongly. Uh, there's a question as to whether or not they have to, but we'll put it before congress.”

CALL TO ACTIVISM

976,024 次观看 • 11 个月前