Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

"The rainbow in Scripture is clear: it's a promise from God to never drown the world again. It is no surprise to me at all that Satan would want to take something that is a sacred, universal, global promise from God and pervert it at such a gross level."... show more

𝕊𝕠𝕝𝕒 ℂ𝕙𝕒𝕕 🎚️

53,879 subscribers

13,648 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee: There's no such thing as replacement theology because to think that means that God would break His promise. And if He breaks it to the Jew, He breaks it to me as a Christian. I want a God who keeps His promise.

U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee: There's no such thing as replacement theology because to think that means that God would break His promise. And if He breaks it to the Jew, He breaks it to me as a Christian. I want a God who keeps His promise.

Clash Report

45,556 views • 3 months ago

"There is no such thing as Christian Nationalism. The kingdom of this world is separate. Nothing that happens in a nation politically/socially has anything to do with the advancement of the Kingdom of God, because the Kingdom of God is separate from that system." —John MacArthur

"There is no such thing as Christian Nationalism. The kingdom of this world is separate. Nothing that happens in a nation politically/socially has anything to do with the advancement of the Kingdom of God, because the Kingdom of God is separate from that system." —John MacArthur

Danny

29,078 views • 11 months ago

This is excellent! “You can’t ignore trying to communicate to the evangelical world that people who turn their back on the truth and walk away never were believers, because true salvation causes people to receive a life from God that cannot die, and so it is manifested in perseverance.” — John MacArthur

This is excellent! “You can’t ignore trying to communicate to the evangelical world that people who turn their back on the truth and walk away never were believers, because true salvation causes people to receive a life from God that cannot die, and so it is manifested in perseverance.” — John MacArthur

Terri Green

22,629 views • 1 year ago

This is evergreen! When a young boy asks John MacArthur why didn’t Jesus just *Pow* in the garden when Eve ate the apple, He can stop it like that? Bible Questions and Answers, Part 70 — John MacArthur “I’m Joey Cusenza, and my question is, why didn’t Jesus stop Eve at the garden of Eden when she ate the fruit? *Like, I mean, pow,* He can just stop it like that. Why didn’t He?” JOHN: That is the most profound question of all questions: Why didn’t God stop Eve from eating the fruit? This theologians call the problem of theodicy: Why is there evil in the world? If God is absolutely holy, why is there evil in the world? That’s essentially that question: Why didn’t He stop it before it started? First of all, the broad answer is this: because God allowed her to eat that fruit, God allowed sin to come into the world, so that He could be glorified. Now God is a God of love, and He could express that love even in the perfection of the Trinity. And He expressed that love to Adam and Eve when He walked and talked with them before they sinned and before she ate. So God could express His love. But if there had never been a sin, there would never be forgiveness, there would never be mercy, there would never be grace, there would never be compassion, there would never be healing, there would never be restoration. And so, forever and ever, the angels would never be able to worship God for all those aspects of His nature. So God allows evil so that He can display grace and mercy and compassion because those also are attributes of God that can only be put on display through His response to sin. There’s another reason, and that is that God is holy and just and righteous. He would never be able to display ultimately what that means unless there were sinners to judge. So whether it is judgment on sin or whether it is salvation from sin, the fact that sin exists allows God to display eternally the glory of the full scope of His attributes. Okay? Great question. Thank you, bud.

This is evergreen! When a young boy asks John MacArthur why didn’t Jesus just Pow in the garden when Eve ate the apple, He can stop it like that? Bible Questions and Answers, Part 70 — John MacArthur “I’m Joey Cusenza, and my question is, why didn’t Jesus stop Eve at the garden of Eden when she ate the fruit? Like, I mean, pow, He can just stop it like that. Why didn’t He?” JOHN: That is the most profound question of all questions: Why didn’t God stop Eve from eating the fruit? This theologians call the problem of theodicy: Why is there evil in the world? If God is absolutely holy, why is there evil in the world? That’s essentially that question: Why didn’t He stop it before it started? First of all, the broad answer is this: because God allowed her to eat that fruit, God allowed sin to come into the world, so that He could be glorified. Now God is a God of love, and He could express that love even in the perfection of the Trinity. And He expressed that love to Adam and Eve when He walked and talked with them before they sinned and before she ate. So God could express His love. But if there had never been a sin, there would never be forgiveness, there would never be mercy, there would never be grace, there would never be compassion, there would never be healing, there would never be restoration. And so, forever and ever, the angels would never be able to worship God for all those aspects of His nature. So God allows evil so that He can display grace and mercy and compassion because those also are attributes of God that can only be put on display through His response to sin. There’s another reason, and that is that God is holy and just and righteous. He would never be able to display ultimately what that means unless there were sinners to judge. So whether it is judgment on sin or whether it is salvation from sin, the fact that sin exists allows God to display eternally the glory of the full scope of His attributes. Okay? Great question. Thank you, bud.

Terri Green

132,183 views • 6 months ago

God Is Sovereign "You either believe in the God who is in complete control of evil, or you believe evil is in control of God and He is reacting to it the best He can. That's not the God of Scripture." —John MacArthur

God Is Sovereign "You either believe in the God who is in complete control of evil, or you believe evil is in control of God and He is reacting to it the best He can. That's not the God of Scripture." —John MacArthur

Danny

13,198 views • 9 months ago

“There are so many pathways to the sacred…. God is not a Christian. God is not a noun at all. God is a verb. God is not a being. God is being itself. God is love, and that’s why Jesus is against anything that gets in the way of that love between neighbors, including religion.”

“There are so many pathways to the sacred…. God is not a Christian. God is not a noun at all. God is a verb. God is not a being. God is being itself. God is love, and that’s why Jesus is against anything that gets in the way of that love between neighbors, including religion.”

Robert A. J. Gagnon

13,573 views • 1 month ago

Russian propagandist Dugin says that "a special military operation is a bloody and hard way to bring Russia back to God": "Apparently, we just can't do it any other way, until we go through such terrible challenges, until we lose our loved ones, we can't realize who we are. We are really going to God, and Russia is the way to God. Russia has no other way. Russia is either the way to God, or it is not existing something at all. Therefore, if it is not the way to God, it [Russia] is of no interest to anyone at all, it is of no value."

Russian propagandist Dugin says that "a special military operation is a bloody and hard way to bring Russia back to God": "Apparently, we just can't do it any other way, until we go through such terrible challenges, until we lose our loved ones, we can't realize who we are. We are really going to God, and Russia is the way to God. Russia has no other way. Russia is either the way to God, or it is not existing something at all. Therefore, if it is not the way to God, it [Russia] is of no interest to anyone at all, it is of no value."

Anton Gerashchenko

281,775 views • 1 year ago

🚨 JUST IN: Speaker Johnson just made it clear that America is a NATION UNDER GOD that must repel Communists at all costs CHRISTIAN NATION! 🙏🏻 "Communism begins with the premise that there is no God. Don't ever forget that. It's anti-American." 💯 "If you walked in at the eye level is 'in GOD we trust' right above the speaker's head!" "In 1962, Congress voted to put that there. It says in the book as a rebuke to the Soviet's philosophy during the Cold War." "What was the Soviet's philosophy? In 1962, Congress recognized it's exactly what we're fighting today. Marxism, communism, socialism, it is a road to human suffering and death." "Congress in the 60's wanted to put that right there so that every person who ever ran for the people's House to serve in that body would have to look at that all day long and recognize that is what distinguishes us from the communist!" The Godless communists need to be defeated at all costs. They are FULLY opposed to Christianity and want to turn us into a nation without inalienable rights.

🚨 JUST IN: Speaker Johnson just made it clear that America is a NATION UNDER GOD that must repel Communists at all costs CHRISTIAN NATION! 🙏🏻 "Communism begins with the premise that there is no God. Don't ever forget that. It's anti-American." 💯 "If you walked in at the eye level is 'in GOD we trust' right above the speaker's head!" "In 1962, Congress voted to put that there. It says in the book as a rebuke to the Soviet's philosophy during the Cold War." "What was the Soviet's philosophy? In 1962, Congress recognized it's exactly what we're fighting today. Marxism, communism, socialism, it is a road to human suffering and death." "Congress in the 60's wanted to put that right there so that every person who ever ran for the people's House to serve in that body would have to look at that all day long and recognize that is what distinguishes us from the communist!" The Godless communists need to be defeated at all costs. They are FULLY opposed to Christianity and want to turn us into a nation without inalienable rights.

Eric Daugherty

41,439 views • 20 days ago

This is a teaching most don't understand or accept. MacArthur on evil: "It is heresy to say that the world is full of evil apart from a predetermined plan and purpose by God. God wills evil to exist. He did not create it, but He ordained it because He had a purpose for it."

This is a teaching most don't understand or accept. MacArthur on evil: "It is heresy to say that the world is full of evil apart from a predetermined plan and purpose by God. God wills evil to exist. He did not create it, but He ordained it because He had a purpose for it."

Danny

113,231 views • 1 year ago

A promise from Tesla’s Technoking, Elon Musk, to Tesla investors: "I will never let you down, no matter what it takes." That promise is being kept, $TSLA is going to the moon! 🚀

A promise from Tesla’s Technoking, Elon Musk, to Tesla investors: "I will never let you down, no matter what it takes." That promise is being kept, $TSLA is going to the moon! 🚀

SMX 🇺🇸

90,190 views • 1 year ago

How you wait makes all the difference. David said, “Bring your request before God and wait expectantly.” Wait in faith, wait knowing that God is working, wait expecting it to show up. Listen to this message from Joel, "The Promise Is Coming":

How you wait makes all the difference. David said, “Bring your request before God and wait expectantly.” Wait in faith, wait knowing that God is working, wait expecting it to show up. Listen to this message from Joel, "The Promise Is Coming":

Joel Osteen

34,018 views • 1 year ago

Charlamagne tha God: “All this chaos is not distracting from the fact that they are doing a terrible job at governing and the promise that Trump made to make things financially better for people on day one is not happening.”

Charlamagne tha God: “All this chaos is not distracting from the fact that they are doing a terrible job at governing and the promise that Trump made to make things financially better for people on day one is not happening.”

Marco Foster

189,169 views • 8 months ago

“God is good and God is perfect. I know that Satan is always trying to distract me from reading the word of God. Satan hates it when you read the Bible.” - Charlie Kirk Which is why you should read it every single day.

“God is good and God is perfect. I know that Satan is always trying to distract me from reading the word of God. Satan hates it when you read the Bible.” - Charlie Kirk Which is why you should read it every single day.

Insurrection Barbie

141,536 views • 4 months ago

Evil exists, God exists. God wills evil to exist. He did not create it, He could not create it, but He did not prevent it. He ordained it, He willed it - here it comes, listen carefully - because He had a purpose for it; He had a purpose for it - a purpose. Why Does Evil Dominate the World? — John MacArthur // March 4, 2007 If God is not in total control of evil, if He has not ordained it – listen - and if He does not have it under complete control at every millisecond of history, then this universe is out of control at the most crucial point. If God is not in control of this completely, then how and when will He get the knowledge and the power to get it under control? And I would ask you this: would you rather have a God trying to get control of evil, or a God completely in control of it? Take your choice. But the God of the Bible is in complete control of evil for His own purposes. It is really heresy to say that the world is full of evil apart from a predetermined plan and purpose by God that is far above the willy-nilly choices of people. So, what do we know up to now? Evil exists, God exists. God wills evil to exist. He did not create it, He could not create it, but He did not prevent it. He ordained it, He willed it - here it comes, listen carefully - because He had a purpose for it; He had a purpose for it - a purpose. This is critical: He had a purpose for evil. What is that purpose that God had for evil? Before I answer that question - and that’s the fourth in our little outline - let me read the Westminster Confession from the 1700s; some great theologians and biblical scholars put this together. Listen carefully: “God, from all eternity, did, by the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely, and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass:“ Yet so, as thereby neither is God the author of sin, nor is violence offered to the will of the creatures; nor is the liberty or contingency of second-hand causes taken away ... sinfulness proceeds not only from the creature; proceeds only from the creature and not from God, who, being most holy and righteous, neither ... can be the author and approver of sin.” But then, says the Westminster Confession, all that God decrees and all that God providentially brings to pass is all to the praise of His glory - and they got it right.The reason for God ordaining evil is for the praise of His glory. Let me ask you a simple question to help you answer the question - the bigger question: is God more glorious because of sin existing or less glorious? Pretty easy question to answer, isn’t it? That really is the ultimate question. Throughout all the eons of eternity, will God receive more glory from His creatures because sin existed or less? And, friends, that’s really all that matters, is the eternal glory of God. So, it’s fourth down, and we’re on the ten-yard line, and I’m pulling out the winning play and we’re going for six for the victory. Turn to Romans 3 - and I want you to track with me a little bit; can’t take time to develop all of this, but I’m going to give you a good start. Wish I could build context; we don’t have time. But let’s look at chapter 3 and verse 5. Opening statement: “But if our unrighteousness demonstrates the righteousness of God, what shall we say?” Grab that phrase: our right - unrighteousness demonstrates the righteousness of God. And Paul uses the first of a series of verbs; this one happens to be sunistēmi, translated demonstrates in the New American Standard. It is a verb that means to disclose, to reveal, to put on display, to show. Our unrighteousness demonstrates the righteousness of God. Another way to say that would be, would you really understand the righteousness of God if you didn’t understand unrighteousness? Isn’t there something to be gained by the contrast? Paul has been showing that God is faithful to His promises to Israel, and their sin and unbelief cannot alter God’s covenant, cannot alter God’s faithfulness.

Evil exists, God exists. God wills evil to exist. He did not create it, He could not create it, but He did not prevent it. He ordained it, He willed it - here it comes, listen carefully - because He had a purpose for it; He had a purpose for it - a purpose. Why Does Evil Dominate the World? — John MacArthur // March 4, 2007 If God is not in total control of evil, if He has not ordained it – listen - and if He does not have it under complete control at every millisecond of history, then this universe is out of control at the most crucial point. If God is not in control of this completely, then how and when will He get the knowledge and the power to get it under control? And I would ask you this: would you rather have a God trying to get control of evil, or a God completely in control of it? Take your choice. But the God of the Bible is in complete control of evil for His own purposes. It is really heresy to say that the world is full of evil apart from a predetermined plan and purpose by God that is far above the willy-nilly choices of people. So, what do we know up to now? Evil exists, God exists. God wills evil to exist. He did not create it, He could not create it, but He did not prevent it. He ordained it, He willed it - here it comes, listen carefully - because He had a purpose for it; He had a purpose for it - a purpose. This is critical: He had a purpose for evil. What is that purpose that God had for evil? Before I answer that question - and that’s the fourth in our little outline - let me read the Westminster Confession from the 1700s; some great theologians and biblical scholars put this together. Listen carefully: “God, from all eternity, did, by the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely, and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass:“ Yet so, as thereby neither is God the author of sin, nor is violence offered to the will of the creatures; nor is the liberty or contingency of second-hand causes taken away ... sinfulness proceeds not only from the creature; proceeds only from the creature and not from God, who, being most holy and righteous, neither ... can be the author and approver of sin.” But then, says the Westminster Confession, all that God decrees and all that God providentially brings to pass is all to the praise of His glory - and they got it right.The reason for God ordaining evil is for the praise of His glory. Let me ask you a simple question to help you answer the question - the bigger question: is God more glorious because of sin existing or less glorious? Pretty easy question to answer, isn’t it? That really is the ultimate question. Throughout all the eons of eternity, will God receive more glory from His creatures because sin existed or less? And, friends, that’s really all that matters, is the eternal glory of God. So, it’s fourth down, and we’re on the ten-yard line, and I’m pulling out the winning play and we’re going for six for the victory. Turn to Romans 3 - and I want you to track with me a little bit; can’t take time to develop all of this, but I’m going to give you a good start. Wish I could build context; we don’t have time. But let’s look at chapter 3 and verse 5. Opening statement: “But if our unrighteousness demonstrates the righteousness of God, what shall we say?” Grab that phrase: our right - unrighteousness demonstrates the righteousness of God. And Paul uses the first of a series of verbs; this one happens to be sunistēmi, translated demonstrates in the New American Standard. It is a verb that means to disclose, to reveal, to put on display, to show. Our unrighteousness demonstrates the righteousness of God. Another way to say that would be, would you really understand the righteousness of God if you didn’t understand unrighteousness? Isn’t there something to be gained by the contrast? Paul has been showing that God is faithful to His promises to Israel, and their sin and unbelief cannot alter God’s covenant, cannot alter God’s faithfulness.

Terri Green

24,466 views • 5 months ago

Interesting argument. If we were to steel man this and represent it as a syllogism I think it would look like this: 1. God is perfect 2. A perfect being would only create perfect things 3. The world is imperfect 4. Therefore, a perfect God could not have created this world ...And then we'd further conclude a perfect God doesn't exist. The problem is with premise two, for a number of reasons. Firstly, what does it mean to be perfect? To be perfect is to lack for nothing, to be without flaws, to be fully actualized. But only God is like that, so the only way for God to make something perfect would be to make another God exactly like Himself. But there's a problem with this because the second God couldn't be exactly the same since he had to be created, rather than simply existing by his very nature. So logically speaking God can't create something perfect. This means that if* God creates, God can only create things that are imperfect. So now that we've established that God can't make something perfect, I guess the question is... why would God create? Here's a thought. Ontologically speaking God is the greatest conceivable being... would the greatest conceivable being create things? Or not create things? It seems obvious that creating is greater than not creating. An artist that creates no art wouldn't be much of an artist. If this is correct, it means God will create, and from my first argument God will create something imperfect... something flawed. Something lacking. Another thing worth pointing out is that as humans we knowingly create imperfect beings. We know when a baby is born, it's not perfect... yet we choose to do it anyway. Why? Is our desire to bring new life into the world something evil or wicked? I don't think so. I think it comes from our love for each other and our understanding that giving life is a blessing, even if that child screws up, even if they suffer, their life is a blessing. If God is good, wouldn't He want to bless something with the gift of life, the same way we do? I don't see why not. From this I think it follows that if God exists we'd expect to be in some sort of imperfect or flawed reality, and that's exactly what we find ourselves in. But how does atheism explain the existence of a flawed world? To say that something is flawed is to say it's not how it should be. But how can the world be flawed if atheism is true? On atheism the world just... is. It's not meant to be any sort of way. To be consistent the atheist would have to say reality isn't flawed, which is obviously absurd. This means that not only can Christianity explain the world we find ourselves in, it predicts it logically. Atheism on the other hand would have to predict a totally neutral world with no flaws, no issues, no evil... and no one in their right mind would say that's the world we find ourselves in. So this argument not only fails, it gives us more great reasons to reject atheism.

Interesting argument. If we were to steel man this and represent it as a syllogism I think it would look like this: 1. God is perfect 2. A perfect being would only create perfect things 3. The world is imperfect 4. Therefore, a perfect God could not have created this world ...And then we'd further conclude a perfect God doesn't exist. The problem is with premise two, for a number of reasons. Firstly, what does it mean to be perfect? To be perfect is to lack for nothing, to be without flaws, to be fully actualized. But only God is like that, so the only way for God to make something perfect would be to make another God exactly like Himself. But there's a problem with this because the second God couldn't be exactly the same since he had to be created, rather than simply existing by his very nature. So logically speaking God can't create something perfect. This means that if* God creates, God can only create things that are imperfect. So now that we've established that God can't make something perfect, I guess the question is... why would God create? Here's a thought. Ontologically speaking God is the greatest conceivable being... would the greatest conceivable being create things? Or not create things? It seems obvious that creating is greater than not creating. An artist that creates no art wouldn't be much of an artist. If this is correct, it means God will create, and from my first argument God will create something imperfect... something flawed. Something lacking. Another thing worth pointing out is that as humans we knowingly create imperfect beings. We know when a baby is born, it's not perfect... yet we choose to do it anyway. Why? Is our desire to bring new life into the world something evil or wicked? I don't think so. I think it comes from our love for each other and our understanding that giving life is a blessing, even if that child screws up, even if they suffer, their life is a blessing. If God is good, wouldn't He want to bless something with the gift of life, the same way we do? I don't see why not. From this I think it follows that if God exists we'd expect to be in some sort of imperfect or flawed reality, and that's exactly what we find ourselves in. But how does atheism explain the existence of a flawed world? To say that something is flawed is to say it's not how it should be. But how can the world be flawed if atheism is true? On atheism the world just... is. It's not meant to be any sort of way. To be consistent the atheist would have to say reality isn't flawed, which is obviously absurd. This means that not only can Christianity explain the world we find ourselves in, it predicts it logically. Atheism on the other hand would have to predict a totally neutral world with no flaws, no issues, no evil... and no one in their right mind would say that's the world we find ourselves in. So this argument not only fails, it gives us more great reasons to reject atheism.

Darwin to Jesus

57,850 views • 5 months ago

At a Q&A with John MacArthur and R.C. Sproul, the question is asked, “Dr. MacArthur, can you tell me if you believe that God is still sending us prophets today, and if yes, how do we recognize them, and no, why not, and where in the Bible would we find that?”

At a Q&A with John MacArthur and R.C. Sproul, the question is asked, “Dr. MacArthur, can you tell me if you believe that God is still sending us prophets today, and if yes, how do we recognize them, and no, why not, and where in the Bible would we find that?”

Terri Green

36,480 views • 6 months ago

“One of the things that’s tragic about praying to the saints and Mary is that it strikes a blow against the gracious character of God and Christ.” -John MacArthur

“One of the things that’s tragic about praying to the saints and Mary is that it strikes a blow against the gracious character of God and Christ.” -John MacArthur

𝕊𝕠𝕝𝕒 ℂ𝕙𝕒𝕕 🎚️

13,724 views • 2 months ago

🚨 NICK SHIRLEY JUST NAILED IT: “The idea of wokeness is essentially the idea to remove God from EVERYTHING!” “The idea that a man can be woman means that God made a mistake.” “But God is the truth. Wokeness really is the idea of just removing God and filling it with something else.” 💯

🚨 NICK SHIRLEY JUST NAILED IT: “The idea of wokeness is essentially the idea to remove God from EVERYTHING!” “The idea that a man can be woman means that God made a mistake.” “But God is the truth. Wokeness really is the idea of just removing God and filling it with something else.” 💯

Eric Daugherty

333,282 views • 5 months ago