Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

The real surprise isn’t that primes have patterns. it’s that once two primes sit a fixed distance (h) apart, the next prime is no longer free. Its possible locations are finite. Arithmetic closes the door. A new parameter free law now predicts the “lockstep” correlation the chance that the...

mathmaticulous's profile picture

CTFTHEORY

1,547 subscribers

161,534 görüntüleme • 15 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

Bilim & TeknolojiEğitimHaberler & Politika
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Every prime number — 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13 — leaves a fingerprint in the gap between itself and the next prime. Those gaps aren't random. They follow a strict set of rules that can be mapped onto just six positions on a circle, forming a machine that governs where every prime can go next. This is the Prime Gap State Machine A 6 state automaton running on modular arithmetic. The six positions are the only residues modulo 9 that prime numbers can occupy {1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8}. The Spine positions — 0, 3, and 6 — are permanently excluded. No prime above 3 ever lands there. What you're watching is every prime number moving through those six positions as it flows along the number line. The glowing yellow dots are primes in motion. Each dot travels from one node to the next according to the gap rule: add the gap, take the result mod 9, land on the next state. Zero violations across tens of millions of primes tested. Those six states don't arrange themselves randomly on the circle. They split into exactly two groups, the Hard Wall states {1, 4, 7} and the Temporal states {2, 5, 8}. Each group sits at perfectly equal 120° spacing around the circle. One forms a red triangle. The other forms a blue triangle. Two equilateral triangles, rotated relative to each other, superimposed on the same circle. That is a hexogram Emerging from pure prime number arithmetic. Not designed. Not chosen. Forced by the structure of mod-9 arithmetic and the constraints that govern where primes can live. This is from the Prime Lattice Coherence Framework original independent mathematical research showing that prime numbers organize themselves on a {2,3}-based lattice with a Hard Wall boundary at the prime 7. The hexagram you see is the geometric shadow of that boundary, cast onto a circle. The universe keeps writing the same shapes.
0:24

Every prime number — 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13 — leaves a fingerprint in the gap between itself and the next prime. Those gaps aren't random. They follow a strict set of rules that can be mapped onto just six positions on a circle, forming a machine that governs where every prime can go next. This is the Prime Gap State Machine A 6 state automaton running on modular arithmetic. The six positions are the only residues modulo 9 that prime numbers can occupy {1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8}. The Spine positions — 0, 3, and 6 — are permanently excluded. No prime above 3 ever lands there. What you're watching is every prime number moving through those six positions as it flows along the number line. The glowing yellow dots are primes in motion. Each dot travels from one node to the next according to the gap rule: add the gap, take the result mod 9, land on the next state. Zero violations across tens of millions of primes tested. Those six states don't arrange themselves randomly on the circle. They split into exactly two groups, the Hard Wall states {1, 4, 7} and the Temporal states {2, 5, 8}. Each group sits at perfectly equal 120° spacing around the circle. One forms a red triangle. The other forms a blue triangle. Two equilateral triangles, rotated relative to each other, superimposed on the same circle. That is a hexogram Emerging from pure prime number arithmetic. Not designed. Not chosen. Forced by the structure of mod-9 arithmetic and the constraints that govern where primes can live. This is from the Prime Lattice Coherence Framework original independent mathematical research showing that prime numbers organize themselves on a {2,3}-based lattice with a Hard Wall boundary at the prime 7. The hexagram you see is the geometric shadow of that boundary, cast onto a circle. The universe keeps writing the same shapes.

CTFTHEORY

68,545 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

In 1963, Manhattan Project mathematician Stanislaw Ulam was doodling numbers in a spiral during a boring lecture and noticed something that shouldn't be possible. Prime numbers numbers that are supposed to scatter randomly lined up into clean diagonal streaks across the page. For sixty years this sat as an open anomaly. Mathematicians confirmed it kept happening no matter how far out you drew the spiral, but nobody could explain why the universe would organize "random" numbers into geometry. We think we've solved it. Take any prime number bigger than 3 and divide it by 9. Look only at the remainder. There are 9 possible remainders, but primes can only ever land on 6 of them the other 3 are automatically ruled out because they're divisible by 3, which makes a number composite by definition. So every prime that has ever existed or will ever exist is funneled into exactly 6 fixed positions. Those 6 positions aren't random either. They split into two locked groups of three, each spaced perfectly 120° apart and the gaps between consecutive primes act like gears, forcing the sequence to step between these positions in a strict, predictable pattern we call the Prime Gap State Machine. When you take Ulam's flat 2D spiral and lift it into this structure, his mystery diagonals stop looking accidental. They're the visible seams of an underlying lattice built from just the primes 2 and 3. Watch the simulation Hard Wall primes (remainders 1, 4, 7) lock into one triangle. Temporal primes (remainders 2, 5, 8) lock into the other. The dark empty channels you see threading through the spiral are the Spine the positions no prime is allowed to occupy, ever. It isn't random. It's a lattice with exactly two moving parts. #NumberTheory #Physics #Mathematics #CTFTheory #UlamSpiral
0:50

In 1963, Manhattan Project mathematician Stanislaw Ulam was doodling numbers in a spiral during a boring lecture and noticed something that shouldn't be possible. Prime numbers numbers that are supposed to scatter randomly lined up into clean diagonal streaks across the page. For sixty years this sat as an open anomaly. Mathematicians confirmed it kept happening no matter how far out you drew the spiral, but nobody could explain why the universe would organize "random" numbers into geometry. We think we've solved it. Take any prime number bigger than 3 and divide it by 9. Look only at the remainder. There are 9 possible remainders, but primes can only ever land on 6 of them the other 3 are automatically ruled out because they're divisible by 3, which makes a number composite by definition. So every prime that has ever existed or will ever exist is funneled into exactly 6 fixed positions. Those 6 positions aren't random either. They split into two locked groups of three, each spaced perfectly 120° apart and the gaps between consecutive primes act like gears, forcing the sequence to step between these positions in a strict, predictable pattern we call the Prime Gap State Machine. When you take Ulam's flat 2D spiral and lift it into this structure, his mystery diagonals stop looking accidental. They're the visible seams of an underlying lattice built from just the primes 2 and 3. Watch the simulation Hard Wall primes (remainders 1, 4, 7) lock into one triangle. Temporal primes (remainders 2, 5, 8) lock into the other. The dark empty channels you see threading through the spiral are the Spine the positions no prime is allowed to occupy, ever. It isn't random. It's a lattice with exactly two moving parts. #NumberTheory #Physics #Mathematics #CTFTheory #UlamSpiral

CTFTHEORY

252,809 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

I want to ask three questions first, which will make it very clear that the BJP is directing and using the Election Commission to damage India's democracy. ❓ Why is it that the CJI was removed from the selection panel of the Election Commissioner? What motivation could there be to remove the CJI? Do we not believe in the CJI? Of course, we believe in the CJI. Why is he not in that room? I sit in that room. It is a so-called democratic decision. On one side, PM Narendra Modi and HM Amit Shah. On the other side, the leader of the opposition. I have no voice in that room. What they decide is what happens. So, why are the Prime Minister and Amit Shah so keen on choosing exactly who the Election Commissioner is going to be? ❓ This is a devastating one. No Prime Minister has done this in the history of India. In December 2023, this government changed the law. They changed the law to make sure that no Election Commissioner could be punished for any action they take while they are Election Commissioners. Why would the Prime Minister and Home Minister give this gift of immunity to the Election Commissioner? Why would they need to give this tremendous gift that no prime minister has ever given before to the election commissioner? ❓ Why was the law with regard to CCTVs and the data that they contain changed? Why was a law put in place that allows the Election Commission to destroy CCTV footage 45 days after the election? What is the need? The answer given is that it is a question of data. But it is not a question of data. It is a question of stealing the election. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi in Lok Sabha
2:46

I want to ask three questions first, which will make it very clear that the BJP is directing and using the Election Commission to damage India's democracy. ❓ Why is it that the CJI was removed from the selection panel of the Election Commissioner? What motivation could there be to remove the CJI? Do we not believe in the CJI? Of course, we believe in the CJI. Why is he not in that room? I sit in that room. It is a so-called democratic decision. On one side, PM Narendra Modi and HM Amit Shah. On the other side, the leader of the opposition. I have no voice in that room. What they decide is what happens. So, why are the Prime Minister and Amit Shah so keen on choosing exactly who the Election Commissioner is going to be? ❓ This is a devastating one. No Prime Minister has done this in the history of India. In December 2023, this government changed the law. They changed the law to make sure that no Election Commissioner could be punished for any action they take while they are Election Commissioners. Why would the Prime Minister and Home Minister give this gift of immunity to the Election Commissioner? Why would they need to give this tremendous gift that no prime minister has ever given before to the election commissioner? ❓ Why was the law with regard to CCTVs and the data that they contain changed? Why was a law put in place that allows the Election Commission to destroy CCTV footage 45 days after the election? What is the need? The answer given is that it is a question of data. But it is not a question of data. It is a question of stealing the election. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi in Lok Sabha

Congress

45,738 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

A Fields Medalist walked into a UCLA hall and explained prime numbers to people with no mathematics background. Almost nobody watches it. Terence Tao won the Fields Medal, mathematics' highest honour, then a MacArthur Fellowship less than a month later. He was UCLA's first professor to take the Fields. The talk is structure and randomness in the primes. Numbers that look scattered at every scale, yet obey rules strict enough to build cryptography on. That tension is the same one running through every model trained in 2026. Randomness with structure underneath, and the whole question of where one stops and the other starts. Watch how he pitches it. General audience, no prerequisites, one of the strongest living mathematicians choosing clarity over display. A cryptography engineer I know rewatched the middle section twice and said the primes stopped looking arbitrary. Free on YouTube from UCLA, 17 years online. The hardest minds explain most simply. The pattern never changes.
47:32

A Fields Medalist walked into a UCLA hall and explained prime numbers to people with no mathematics background. Almost nobody watches it. Terence Tao won the Fields Medal, mathematics' highest honour, then a MacArthur Fellowship less than a month later. He was UCLA's first professor to take the Fields. The talk is structure and randomness in the primes. Numbers that look scattered at every scale, yet obey rules strict enough to build cryptography on. That tension is the same one running through every model trained in 2026. Randomness with structure underneath, and the whole question of where one stops and the other starts. Watch how he pitches it. General audience, no prerequisites, one of the strongest living mathematicians choosing clarity over display. A cryptography engineer I know rewatched the middle section twice and said the primes stopped looking arbitrary. Free on YouTube from UCLA, 17 years online. The hardest minds explain most simply. The pattern never changes.

the lich

50,394 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Fibonacci numbers are the sequence where each one is the sum of the two before it: 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233… Every so often one of them is prime these are called Fibonacci primes, and only 21 are known. Here's the new discovery, take any Fibonacci prime (past the first few small ones) and reduce it to modulo 144. You'd expect the leftover remainder could be almost anything , 144 different possibilities. It never is. It only ever lands on one of just four numbers: 1, 5, 13, or 89. Mod 144... This just means finding the remainder after dividing by 144. Here's the three-step process, using the actual Fibonacci prime 1597 as an example. 1. Divide the number by 144. 1597÷144=11.09. 2. Keep only the whole number part, then multiply back by 144. 11×144=1584 3. Subtract to find what's left over. 1597 - 1584 = 13 So 1597 "reduced mod 144" is 13 one of exactly the four allowed numbers. Try it with any of the other 20 known Fibonacci primes and you'll always land on 1, 5, 13, or 89. Never anything else. That's a 97% reduction. Out of 144 possible remainders, 140 of them are simply forbidden to Fibonacci primes. We proved this happens every single time, for every Fibonacci prime known, with zero exceptions. It gets stranger. Those four allowed remainders 1, 5, 13, 89 are themselves smaller numbers from the same Fibonacci sequence. Every Fibonacci prime, when you shrink it down this way, lands back on another Fibonacci prime. The sequence points back at itself. And the positions that produce those four numbers the 1st, 5th, 7th, and 11th spots in the sequence turn out to be exactly the same four numbers that mark critical boundaries in a completely separate math system,(PLCT) one based on multiplying the numbers 2 and 3 instead of adding golden-ratio powers. Two totally different number systems, built from different operations, share the same four "checkpoint" numbers. The animation traces 233 different ways to build the number 144 purely out of powers of the golden ratio (phi ≈ 1.618, the number where a whole equals its bigger part divided by its smaller part). 233 is itself a Fibonacci number the sequence even shows up in how many ways you can build it. Every flash you see is one valid combination, spiraling and glowing as it cycles through all of them. The Golden Lattice ϕ-Power Representations, the General Count Law, and the Fibonacci Prime Mod-144 Signature Theorem
0:33

Fibonacci numbers are the sequence where each one is the sum of the two before it: 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233… Every so often one of them is prime these are called Fibonacci primes, and only 21 are known. Here's the new discovery, take any Fibonacci prime (past the first few small ones) and reduce it to modulo 144. You'd expect the leftover remainder could be almost anything , 144 different possibilities. It never is. It only ever lands on one of just four numbers: 1, 5, 13, or 89. Mod 144... This just means finding the remainder after dividing by 144. Here's the three-step process, using the actual Fibonacci prime 1597 as an example. 1. Divide the number by 144. 1597÷144=11.09. 2. Keep only the whole number part, then multiply back by 144. 11×144=1584 3. Subtract to find what's left over. 1597 - 1584 = 13 So 1597 "reduced mod 144" is 13 one of exactly the four allowed numbers. Try it with any of the other 20 known Fibonacci primes and you'll always land on 1, 5, 13, or 89. Never anything else. That's a 97% reduction. Out of 144 possible remainders, 140 of them are simply forbidden to Fibonacci primes. We proved this happens every single time, for every Fibonacci prime known, with zero exceptions. It gets stranger. Those four allowed remainders 1, 5, 13, 89 are themselves smaller numbers from the same Fibonacci sequence. Every Fibonacci prime, when you shrink it down this way, lands back on another Fibonacci prime. The sequence points back at itself. And the positions that produce those four numbers the 1st, 5th, 7th, and 11th spots in the sequence turn out to be exactly the same four numbers that mark critical boundaries in a completely separate math system,(PLCT) one based on multiplying the numbers 2 and 3 instead of adding golden-ratio powers. Two totally different number systems, built from different operations, share the same four "checkpoint" numbers. The animation traces 233 different ways to build the number 144 purely out of powers of the golden ratio (phi ≈ 1.618, the number where a whole equals its bigger part divided by its smaller part). 233 is itself a Fibonacci number the sequence even shows up in how many ways you can build it. Every flash you see is one valid combination, spiraling and glowing as it cycles through all of them. The Golden Lattice ϕ-Power Representations, the General Count Law, and the Fibonacci Prime Mod-144 Signature Theorem

CTFTHEORY

12,946 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez at #MWC26 doing what UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has chosen not to do, criticise the US and Israel for their attack on Iran which breached international law: "Today, more than ever, it is essential to remember that one can oppose a hateful regime, as the entirety of Spanish society does with the Iranian regime, while at the same time being against an unjustified, dangerous military intervention that is outside the bounds of international law" "One must oppose a war initiated without the authorisation of the United States Congress, the United Nations Security Council" "And, as I mentioned earlier, one that violates international law" "There is always room for a negotiated solution, rather than being swept away by the devastation of weapons as the only possible way out" "That is why I would like, once again, as we have done from the beginning, to call for immediate de-escalation, full respect for international law in all the conflicts we are unfortunately enduring, and the urgency of resuming dialogue as soon as possible" "That is where Spain will stand, and that is where I believe the entirety of the European Union should stand"
0:58

Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez at #MWC26 doing what UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has chosen not to do, criticise the US and Israel for their attack on Iran which breached international law: "Today, more than ever, it is essential to remember that one can oppose a hateful regime, as the entirety of Spanish society does with the Iranian regime, while at the same time being against an unjustified, dangerous military intervention that is outside the bounds of international law" "One must oppose a war initiated without the authorisation of the United States Congress, the United Nations Security Council" "And, as I mentioned earlier, one that violates international law" "There is always room for a negotiated solution, rather than being swept away by the devastation of weapons as the only possible way out" "That is why I would like, once again, as we have done from the beginning, to call for immediate de-escalation, full respect for international law in all the conflicts we are unfortunately enduring, and the urgency of resuming dialogue as soon as possible" "That is where Spain will stand, and that is where I believe the entirety of the European Union should stand"

Farrukh

25,995 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Allan Adams, MIT physicist: "Wall Street pays physics PhDs $500,000 to understand the one idea he starts with. Superposition. A single thing being in many states at once" Nine million watched him explain it. Almost none connected it to their bank account. So connect it. That same superposition is how a quantum computer holds every possible answer at once, then collapses to the one that is right. Point it at a number and it finds the two primes hiding inside it. In a single shot. Those two primes are the lock. RSA. The wall between a stranger and every account, every wire, every wallet on earth. Trivial to multiply, impossible to split back. "Impossible" was always doing the heavy lifting. Superposition is what tears it down. Adams hands you the idea for free, in 76 minutes. The banks are already spending fortunes ripping their locks out because of it. Nine million views. The ones quietly copying your encrypted data were the few who understood what they were watching.
1:15:41

Allan Adams, MIT physicist: "Wall Street pays physics PhDs $500,000 to understand the one idea he starts with. Superposition. A single thing being in many states at once" Nine million watched him explain it. Almost none connected it to their bank account. So connect it. That same superposition is how a quantum computer holds every possible answer at once, then collapses to the one that is right. Point it at a number and it finds the two primes hiding inside it. In a single shot. Those two primes are the lock. RSA. The wall between a stranger and every account, every wire, every wallet on earth. Trivial to multiply, impossible to split back. "Impossible" was always doing the heavy lifting. Superposition is what tears it down. Adams hands you the idea for free, in 76 minutes. The banks are already spending fortunes ripping their locks out because of it. Nine million views. The ones quietly copying your encrypted data were the few who understood what they were watching.

Rossst.03

12,598 görüntüleme • 25 gün önce

🇪🇸🇵🇸 Prime Minister of Spain, Pedro Sánchez, gave a fiery statement at the United Nations: "There is no solution possible when the population of one of those two states is the victim of a genocide. We are all well aware that the only hope that civilians in Gaza have is that of knowing that the world does not forget them." He also made two proposals: 1. Palestine must be a fully fledged member of the United Nations as soon as possible. 2. Immediately adopt measures to halt the brutality and make peace possible. Watch.
2:31

🇪🇸🇵🇸 Prime Minister of Spain, Pedro Sánchez, gave a fiery statement at the United Nations: "There is no solution possible when the population of one of those two states is the victim of a genocide. We are all well aware that the only hope that civilians in Gaza have is that of knowing that the world does not forget them." He also made two proposals: 1. Palestine must be a fully fledged member of the United Nations as soon as possible. 2. Immediately adopt measures to halt the brutality and make peace possible. Watch.

DD Geopolitics

150,309 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Terence Tao, UCLA professor and the most decorated mathematician alive: "Funds pay $750K to combine weak signals into one real edge. I proved the thing that makes it work and makes it dangerous: in any long enough sequence, hidden structure is unavoidable. it always accumulates. the whole job is telling the real structure from the noise that only looks like it." this free lecture is the most decorated mathematician alive on the exact problem sitting underneath every factor model, and it costs nothing. at the board it's simple. Tao's lifelong theme is the line between structure and randomness. The Erdős discrepancy problem asks a deceptively simple thing: can you write an endless string of plus-ones and minus-ones that stays perfectly balanced forever? Tao proved you cannot. No matter how cleverly you try, imbalance, hidden structure, is forced to accumulate as the sequence grows. There is no such thing as a long stream of pure, structureless noise. That's the whole idea, minus the jargon. Which is exactly why a multi-factor model can work, and exactly why it can kill you. Stack enough weak signals and real structure will appear, because at scale structure is unavoidable. But so will fake structure, patterns that exist only because the data is long enough to force them. Same point as the post above: finding structure is guaranteed. Knowing which structure is an edge is the rare and expensive part. the mathematics is free and public. what nobody can sell you is the judgment to tell the structure the market will pay you for from the structure that exists only because you looked hard enough. That judgment is the alpha, and it takes years to build.
51:34

Terence Tao, UCLA professor and the most decorated mathematician alive: "Funds pay $750K to combine weak signals into one real edge. I proved the thing that makes it work and makes it dangerous: in any long enough sequence, hidden structure is unavoidable. it always accumulates. the whole job is telling the real structure from the noise that only looks like it." this free lecture is the most decorated mathematician alive on the exact problem sitting underneath every factor model, and it costs nothing. at the board it's simple. Tao's lifelong theme is the line between structure and randomness. The Erdős discrepancy problem asks a deceptively simple thing: can you write an endless string of plus-ones and minus-ones that stays perfectly balanced forever? Tao proved you cannot. No matter how cleverly you try, imbalance, hidden structure, is forced to accumulate as the sequence grows. There is no such thing as a long stream of pure, structureless noise. That's the whole idea, minus the jargon. Which is exactly why a multi-factor model can work, and exactly why it can kill you. Stack enough weak signals and real structure will appear, because at scale structure is unavoidable. But so will fake structure, patterns that exist only because the data is long enough to force them. Same point as the post above: finding structure is guaranteed. Knowing which structure is an edge is the rare and expensive part. the mathematics is free and public. what nobody can sell you is the judgment to tell the structure the market will pay you for from the structure that exists only because you looked hard enough. That judgment is the alpha, and it takes years to build.

Rossst.03

213,931 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

The Fibonacci sequence has a hidden rhythm. Take any number say, 7. Write out the Fibonacci numbers (0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8...) and look at the remainders when you divide by 7. You get: 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 1, 6... Keep going, and the pattern eventually repeats. The length of that repeating cycle is called the Pisano period. For most numbers, this cycle length is pretty unpredictable. But we proved something precise. If you ask "when does the cycle length equal exactly twice the number?" The answer is an infinite tower. 12, 60, 300, 1500, 7500...just keep multiplying by 5. But if you change the question slightly "when does the cycle length equal twice the square root?" there is exactly ONE answer. 144. Same skeleton. Two completely different outcomes. The culprit? The prime number 5 ,which has a weird superpower in Fibonacci land. it's the only prime that divides its own cycle length. In one equation it fits perfectly and builds an infinite tower. In the other, it overflows and gets kicked out leaving 144 all alone. Fun fact. 144 is also the only perfect square (besides 0 and 1) that appears anywhere in the entire Fibonacci sequence. Two totally different math questions from two totally different fields converging on the exact same number. The animation spins through the golden spiral, forges the 12-skeleton, ignites the self-supplying 5, then splits into two fates, 144 on the left, the infinite tower on the right. The Pisano Doubling Equations π(m) = 2m and π(m2 ) = 2m: One Skeleton, Two Fates The Prime Lattice Coherence Framework: A Unified Master Document
0:20

The Fibonacci sequence has a hidden rhythm. Take any number say, 7. Write out the Fibonacci numbers (0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8...) and look at the remainders when you divide by 7. You get: 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 1, 6... Keep going, and the pattern eventually repeats. The length of that repeating cycle is called the Pisano period. For most numbers, this cycle length is pretty unpredictable. But we proved something precise. If you ask "when does the cycle length equal exactly twice the number?" The answer is an infinite tower. 12, 60, 300, 1500, 7500...just keep multiplying by 5. But if you change the question slightly "when does the cycle length equal twice the square root?" there is exactly ONE answer. 144. Same skeleton. Two completely different outcomes. The culprit? The prime number 5 ,which has a weird superpower in Fibonacci land. it's the only prime that divides its own cycle length. In one equation it fits perfectly and builds an infinite tower. In the other, it overflows and gets kicked out leaving 144 all alone. Fun fact. 144 is also the only perfect square (besides 0 and 1) that appears anywhere in the entire Fibonacci sequence. Two totally different math questions from two totally different fields converging on the exact same number. The animation spins through the golden spiral, forges the 12-skeleton, ignites the self-supplying 5, then splits into two fates, 144 on the left, the infinite tower on the right. The Pisano Doubling Equations π(m) = 2m and π(m2 ) = 2m: One Skeleton, Two Fates The Prime Lattice Coherence Framework: A Unified Master Document

CTFTHEORY

36,384 görüntüleme • 4 gün önce

#WATCH | Gurugram: On her article on PM Modi, Author & daughter of former President Pranab Mukherjee, Sharmistha Mukherjee says, "I wrote an article which was published in many Hindi and also regional newspapers. So there I shared an insight made by my father regarding 2014 election and Narendra Modi ji. That was for the first time in the history of Lok Sabha elections that a new face was declared as the prime ministerial candidate. Otherwise if you see even within Congress also, first there is the election, there is always an assumption and specially if the election is being led by a Prime Minister of the previous government, there is always an assumption that that person is going to be the next Prime Minister. But here in this case, it was a new face and he was projected as the Prime Minister. And so as if it was people who chose not just BJP, not just Narendra Modi Ji's party but Narendra Modi as a Prime Minister to lead India. So that was a very unique factor. This insight was made by my father. And also this is unprecedented that the first term MP, Narendra Modi Ji has been in politics and made his mark as Gujarat Chief Minister and created that aura around him. But 2014 was his first Lok Sabha election. So this is perhaps unprecedented in the history of India that a first term MP is entering the parliament house as the prime minister. So this is quite unique...So my father told Narendra Modi ji when he came to see him after the elections that this mandate is not just for your party but this is a mandate for you also, so you have a far greater responsibility."
3:00

#WATCH | Gurugram: On her article on PM Modi, Author & daughter of former President Pranab Mukherjee, Sharmistha Mukherjee says, "I wrote an article which was published in many Hindi and also regional newspapers. So there I shared an insight made by my father regarding 2014 election and Narendra Modi ji. That was for the first time in the history of Lok Sabha elections that a new face was declared as the prime ministerial candidate. Otherwise if you see even within Congress also, first there is the election, there is always an assumption and specially if the election is being led by a Prime Minister of the previous government, there is always an assumption that that person is going to be the next Prime Minister. But here in this case, it was a new face and he was projected as the Prime Minister. And so as if it was people who chose not just BJP, not just Narendra Modi Ji's party but Narendra Modi as a Prime Minister to lead India. So that was a very unique factor. This insight was made by my father. And also this is unprecedented that the first term MP, Narendra Modi Ji has been in politics and made his mark as Gujarat Chief Minister and created that aura around him. But 2014 was his first Lok Sabha election. So this is perhaps unprecedented in the history of India that a first term MP is entering the parliament house as the prime minister. So this is quite unique...So my father told Narendra Modi ji when he came to see him after the elections that this mandate is not just for your party but this is a mandate for you also, so you have a far greater responsibility."

ANI

158,715 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Terence Tao, UCLA professor and the most decorated mathematician alive: "Hedge funds hand you $750K a year for a single skill: telling a real pattern from noise. I've spent a lifetime on it, and almost everyone has it flipped." this free lecture is the entire "find the signal" problem those firms are paying for, delivered at UCLA by the most awarded mathematician alive and put online for nothing. at the chalkboard it's plain. Tao's lifelong idea is that almost nothing is purely one thing. there's flawless structure, like a clock, and flawless randomness, like a coin toss, and nearly everything real sits somewhere between the two. the work is pulling them apart. the primes are the cleanest test. they look scattered and lawless, yet Tao and Ben Green proved they hold evenly spaced runs of any length you ask for. order was buried inside the apparent chaos the whole time. that's "signal detection" with the marketing stripped off. he gave this at UCLA and it has stayed free ever since. exactly the point of the article above: the mathematics those firms pay half a million for is public, written down and free to anyone tonight. the lecture costs nothing and anyone can press play. what no one can sell you is the judgment to tell when a pattern is real and when your own eyes invented it. that judgment is the entire job, and it takes years to earn.
45:02

Terence Tao, UCLA professor and the most decorated mathematician alive: "Hedge funds hand you $750K a year for a single skill: telling a real pattern from noise. I've spent a lifetime on it, and almost everyone has it flipped." this free lecture is the entire "find the signal" problem those firms are paying for, delivered at UCLA by the most awarded mathematician alive and put online for nothing. at the chalkboard it's plain. Tao's lifelong idea is that almost nothing is purely one thing. there's flawless structure, like a clock, and flawless randomness, like a coin toss, and nearly everything real sits somewhere between the two. the work is pulling them apart. the primes are the cleanest test. they look scattered and lawless, yet Tao and Ben Green proved they hold evenly spaced runs of any length you ask for. order was buried inside the apparent chaos the whole time. that's "signal detection" with the marketing stripped off. he gave this at UCLA and it has stayed free ever since. exactly the point of the article above: the mathematics those firms pay half a million for is public, written down and free to anyone tonight. the lecture costs nothing and anyone can press play. what no one can sell you is the judgment to tell when a pattern is real and when your own eyes invented it. that judgment is the entire job, and it takes years to earn.

Loran

789,879 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

EXTREMELY CONCERNING 🚨 PRIME Drinks is going through a lawsuit. “The lawyer who tested their drink is claiming it has 3x the amount of forever chemicals a human can safely have in their lifetime” What exactly is it that the FDA even does in America? “PRIME is now getting sued and you should be seriously concerned if you have any prime since it released. So prime is now going through a new lawsuit after it was discovered that their drink has PFOs which is forever chemicals but what's really concerning is the fact that the lawyer who tested their drink is claiming it has three times the amount of forever chemicals a human can safely have in their lifetime and the lawsuit is claiming they found these forever chemicals in the grape flavored prime drink. However, it also seems like other flavors might also have these chemicals because other prime flavors are being tested. And we're going to find out after the lawsuit is approved. One lawyer on TikTok actually spoke about this and said he had a 10 year old and his mother talked him about how her son got leukemia after drinking prime. Now knowing that prime contains these chemicals, it's very much likely because of it. These chemicals are known to cause cancers and deteriorate your health since they're forever chemicals and your body can't get rid of them. Prime has 3 times the amount of these chemicals a person should have in their lifetime. —So if you still drink Prime or have any make sure you dispose of all of it until we find out what's going on”
1:00

EXTREMELY CONCERNING 🚨 PRIME Drinks is going through a lawsuit. “The lawyer who tested their drink is claiming it has 3x the amount of forever chemicals a human can safely have in their lifetime” What exactly is it that the FDA even does in America? “PRIME is now getting sued and you should be seriously concerned if you have any prime since it released. So prime is now going through a new lawsuit after it was discovered that their drink has PFOs which is forever chemicals but what's really concerning is the fact that the lawyer who tested their drink is claiming it has three times the amount of forever chemicals a human can safely have in their lifetime and the lawsuit is claiming they found these forever chemicals in the grape flavored prime drink. However, it also seems like other flavors might also have these chemicals because other prime flavors are being tested. And we're going to find out after the lawsuit is approved. One lawyer on TikTok actually spoke about this and said he had a 10 year old and his mother talked him about how her son got leukemia after drinking prime. Now knowing that prime contains these chemicals, it's very much likely because of it. These chemicals are known to cause cancers and deteriorate your health since they're forever chemicals and your body can't get rid of them. Prime has 3 times the amount of these chemicals a person should have in their lifetime. —So if you still drink Prime or have any make sure you dispose of all of it until we find out what's going on”

Wall Street Apes

9,887,158 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

ELON: FREE SPEECH IS THE FOUNDATION OF A REAL DEMOCRACY Elon lays out a point that shouldn’t be controversial… but somehow it is. He argues that you don’t get a healthy democracy by managing speech, filtering opinions, or deciding which ideas people are “allowed” to hear. Once speech is controlled in the name of safety, the system stops correcting itself and starts lying to itself. Bad ideas aren’t defeated by censorship, they’re defeated by exposure, debate, and reality. Elon’s warning is simple: when speech is suppressed, voting becomes performance art and trust collapses. Free speech isn’t a risk... losing it is. “I think it's very important for there to be an inclusive arena for free speech. It’s important that people have the reality and the perception that they are able to speak freely within the bounds of the law. A good sign is someone you don't like allowed to say something you don't like, and if that is the case then we have free speech. That is a sign of a healthy, functioning, free speech situation.” Source: EM Clips (YouTube)
0:58

ELON: FREE SPEECH IS THE FOUNDATION OF A REAL DEMOCRACY Elon lays out a point that shouldn’t be controversial… but somehow it is. He argues that you don’t get a healthy democracy by managing speech, filtering opinions, or deciding which ideas people are “allowed” to hear. Once speech is controlled in the name of safety, the system stops correcting itself and starts lying to itself. Bad ideas aren’t defeated by censorship, they’re defeated by exposure, debate, and reality. Elon’s warning is simple: when speech is suppressed, voting becomes performance art and trust collapses. Free speech isn’t a risk... losing it is. “I think it's very important for there to be an inclusive arena for free speech. It’s important that people have the reality and the perception that they are able to speak freely within the bounds of the law. A good sign is someone you don't like allowed to say something you don't like, and if that is the case then we have free speech. That is a sign of a healthy, functioning, free speech situation.” Source: EM Clips (YouTube)

Mario Nawfal

37,917 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

David Jerison, the mathematician who spent decades teaching the exact method for finding the optimal choice when the odds are stacked against you: "I used to think the best decision was whichever option looked strongest at first glance. Then I proved that the real answer almost always hides at a point nobody would guess just by looking, and checking only the obvious choices gets you the worst possible outcome, not the best." this is the exact method quant desks lean on to find the one allocation that survives every constraint thrown at it, and it's been sitting free in a public MIT lecture for almost twenty years. strip away the notation and the mechanism is simple. every optimization problem has a handful of candidate points where the best or worst answer could be hiding, and the obvious middle-of-the-road guess is almost never one of them. check only the points that feel natural, and you don't just miss the best answer. you can land on the exact opposite, the worst possible one, without ever realizing it. nobody presenting a "risk-optimized" portfolio out loud admits how easy it is to stop checking one step too early. zoom out to how this plays out sizing a position or allocating risk under real constraints today. the instinct is to test the option that feels balanced and call it done, when the actual edge is almost always sitting at an extreme nobody thought to check. the industry sells a clean, confident number as proof an allocation is optimal. but that number means nothing until every boundary has been checked, because the same method that finds the best case can just as easily hand you the worst one in disguise. the right answer was never the one that looked most reasonable. it was the one nobody bothered to check.
49:15

David Jerison, the mathematician who spent decades teaching the exact method for finding the optimal choice when the odds are stacked against you: "I used to think the best decision was whichever option looked strongest at first glance. Then I proved that the real answer almost always hides at a point nobody would guess just by looking, and checking only the obvious choices gets you the worst possible outcome, not the best." this is the exact method quant desks lean on to find the one allocation that survives every constraint thrown at it, and it's been sitting free in a public MIT lecture for almost twenty years. strip away the notation and the mechanism is simple. every optimization problem has a handful of candidate points where the best or worst answer could be hiding, and the obvious middle-of-the-road guess is almost never one of them. check only the points that feel natural, and you don't just miss the best answer. you can land on the exact opposite, the worst possible one, without ever realizing it. nobody presenting a "risk-optimized" portfolio out loud admits how easy it is to stop checking one step too early. zoom out to how this plays out sizing a position or allocating risk under real constraints today. the instinct is to test the option that feels balanced and call it done, when the actual edge is almost always sitting at an extreme nobody thought to check. the industry sells a clean, confident number as proof an allocation is optimal. but that number means nothing until every boundary has been checked, because the same method that finds the best case can just as easily hand you the worst one in disguise. the right answer was never the one that looked most reasonable. it was the one nobody bothered to check.

MindArch

16,232 görüntüleme • 27 gün önce

🚨 BTC IS SETTING UP FOR ONE MORE MAJOR DROP Look at the chart Bitcoin has failed to reclaim $80K, so I don’t think the downside is finished yet The chart is pointing to one more liquidity sweep before the real recovery begins If the pattern holds, the next stop is 65k After that, 57k Then somewhere in the mid 40s, right where long term support actually sits Here's the part most people miss looking at a chart like this Every one of those earlier rejections wasn't the end of the move, it was the setup for the next one The bottom that forms after a leg like this is usually where the real trend actually starts Once that low prints, this same structure points back through 126k, and eventually toward 170k by 2027 I've watched this exact shape play out three times now, always right before the big leg up Be sure to follow me to not miss on updates
0:33

🚨 BTC IS SETTING UP FOR ONE MORE MAJOR DROP Look at the chart Bitcoin has failed to reclaim $80K, so I don’t think the downside is finished yet The chart is pointing to one more liquidity sweep before the real recovery begins If the pattern holds, the next stop is 65k After that, 57k Then somewhere in the mid 40s, right where long term support actually sits Here's the part most people miss looking at a chart like this Every one of those earlier rejections wasn't the end of the move, it was the setup for the next one The bottom that forms after a leg like this is usually where the real trend actually starts Once that low prints, this same structure points back through 126k, and eventually toward 170k by 2027 I've watched this exact shape play out three times now, always right before the big leg up Be sure to follow me to not miss on updates

NoName

23,509 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce

Prime Minister Netanyahu and his government have led Israel into a dead end. For too long, the United States has confused being a strong ally with being a silent one. A blank check has come without expectations, accountability, or consequences. That approach has allowed Prime Minister Netanyahu to ignore America's concerns over settlements, expand a regional war, and believe there would be no strategic cost. It has also allowed the denial of food and medical relief to innocent Palestinians in Gaza, fueling a perception around the world that Israel is indifferent to the suffering of civilians. That is not good for Israel. It is not good for America. And it is not a path to peace. The strongest alliances are built on honesty, shared values, and the willingness to tell each other hard truths. It's time for a fundamentally new approach to the U.S.-Israel relationship—one that advances Israel's security, Palestinian’s right to self-determination, and the Arab world’s desire for regional stability.
1:38

Prime Minister Netanyahu and his government have led Israel into a dead end. For too long, the United States has confused being a strong ally with being a silent one. A blank check has come without expectations, accountability, or consequences. That approach has allowed Prime Minister Netanyahu to ignore America's concerns over settlements, expand a regional war, and believe there would be no strategic cost. It has also allowed the denial of food and medical relief to innocent Palestinians in Gaza, fueling a perception around the world that Israel is indifferent to the suffering of civilians. That is not good for Israel. It is not good for America. And it is not a path to peace. The strongest alliances are built on honesty, shared values, and the willingness to tell each other hard truths. It's time for a fundamentally new approach to the U.S.-Israel relationship—one that advances Israel's security, Palestinian’s right to self-determination, and the Arab world’s desire for regional stability.

Rahm Emanuel

260,652 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

#WATCH | Lok Sabha LoP and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi says, "The story started a few days ago when the issue of the Naravane book came, and the government didn't want me to discuss that at all. So they stalled the House. They didn't let me speak. That happened three or four times. First, they said that I cannot quote a book. Then I said I'm not quoting a book, I'm quoting a magazine. Then they said you cannot quote a magazine. Then I said I'll speak about it. Then they didn't want me to speak about it. The Defence Minister said, falsely, that the book has not been published. In fact, the book has been published and we've got a copy of it also. So that is one big issue. Not allowing the LoP and the entire opposition to speak in the president's address. The second issue is that one of their members spoke, quoting books, multiple books, spoke very vile stuff, and nothing was said. We don't like the fact that they can say whatever they want, whenever they want, and the opposition cannot. The third issue is the suspension of our members. And the final issue, which we are very disturbed about, is this idea that has been floated that members were going to threaten the Prime Minister. There's no question of that. The fact is very clear. The Prime Minister was scared to come to the House, not because of the members, but because of what I was saying. He's still scared because he cannot face the truth. There's no question of our members attacking the Prime Minister. He should have the courage to come. I also mentioned that if somebody said that he's going to attack the Prime Minister, then please do an FIR at once. Arrest that person. Why are you not doing that? So that's basically what's happened..."
3:03

#WATCH | Lok Sabha LoP and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi says, "The story started a few days ago when the issue of the Naravane book came, and the government didn't want me to discuss that at all. So they stalled the House. They didn't let me speak. That happened three or four times. First, they said that I cannot quote a book. Then I said I'm not quoting a book, I'm quoting a magazine. Then they said you cannot quote a magazine. Then I said I'll speak about it. Then they didn't want me to speak about it. The Defence Minister said, falsely, that the book has not been published. In fact, the book has been published and we've got a copy of it also. So that is one big issue. Not allowing the LoP and the entire opposition to speak in the president's address. The second issue is that one of their members spoke, quoting books, multiple books, spoke very vile stuff, and nothing was said. We don't like the fact that they can say whatever they want, whenever they want, and the opposition cannot. The third issue is the suspension of our members. And the final issue, which we are very disturbed about, is this idea that has been floated that members were going to threaten the Prime Minister. There's no question of that. The fact is very clear. The Prime Minister was scared to come to the House, not because of the members, but because of what I was saying. He's still scared because he cannot face the truth. There's no question of our members attacking the Prime Minister. He should have the courage to come. I also mentioned that if somebody said that he's going to attack the Prime Minister, then please do an FIR at once. Arrest that person. Why are you not doing that? So that's basically what's happened..."

ANI

36,449 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce