正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

The same narrative keeps getting pushed without any legitimate evidence whatsoever that Joe Biden took bribes. Even Fox News MAGA-lover Maria Bartiromo seemed to catch Ted Cruz off guard asking this very question. You can push theories all you want, but it's time to put up or shut up....

EdKrassen's profile picture

Ed Krassenstein

1,097,623 subscribers

461,147 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 条评论

UrbanistaRamon 的头像
UrbanistaRamon2 年前

When Maria Bartiromo questions, the legitimacy of a Biden impeachment, you know the tides are turning. This is a losing issue for Republicans.

Ed Krassenstein 的头像
Ed Krassenstein2 年前

It's getting old, right?

Ababu A. 的头像
Ababu A.2 年前

Why do so many people believe unsubstantiated theories on social media?

Ed Krassenstein 的头像
Ed Krassenstein2 年前

Because the theories align with their political hopes.

🇺🇸 ProudPatriot 🇺🇸 的头像
🇺🇸 ProudPatriot 🇺🇸2 年前

His whole family has taking bribes. What the hell are you talking about?

Ed Krassenstein 的头像
Ed Krassenstein2 年前

Where is the evidence that Joe Biden took a bribe for a policy change -- and by evidence, I mean someone that wouldn't get laughed out of a courtroom.

JD Sharp 的头像
JD Sharp2 年前

Evidence: - Emails under a pseudonym - Calls - Bank accounts - Fake corporations - Wire transfers - Meetings - Video admissions - Hunter's Burisma salary - The laptop It's quite extensive actually Edward.

Craig Chamberlin 的头像
Craig Chamberlin2 年前

They can keep dangling the carrot on a stick, but at some point Republicans are going to have to deliver if they have the goods.

Ed Krassenstein 的头像
Ed Krassenstein2 年前

I think their plan though is to just keep dangling the carrot until the election.

Rare 🇺🇸 的头像
Rare 🇺🇸2 年前

Now do Trump. What evidence of a crime do you have? And there’s no evidence in those 91 indictments.

相关视频

Jamie Raskin makes a good point to Chuck Todd today. If Hunter Biden took a job and he got those jobs because foreign companies thought it would be beneficial to them because his Father was VP, then it was wrong (not illegal) for Hunter to take that job. Meanwhile, we can also say the same about the following: Donald Trump literally sold hundreds of hotel rooms to foreign government who didn’t even stay in the hotels. How do we know those governments didn’t use Trump’s hotels to pay Trump for favors? Why would they stay at Trump hotels and not a hotel down the road? To many it would seem obvious that it was because they had hopes for political favors. Donald Trump Jr.’s good friend and foreign business partner Gentry Beach not only got to meet with Donald Trump, but he also got invited to the WH to take part in private White House meetings. He got invited to meet with the top National Security Council officials in the US and pushed them to make policy decisions that would be beneficial to his personal businesses. But Joe Biden meeting with Hunter’s business partners, even though there is no evidence that he discussed business with them, is “corrupt,” right? Jared Kushner secured a $1.2 Billion lease deal from a company that was owned in large part by the Qatari government just as Trump was supporting an anti-Qatari Middle Eastern Blockade of Qatar. Why would they invest in Jared Kushner’s building when there were literally dozens of other buildings to invest into? Could it be that they wanted Trump to stop supporting the blockade? Do you know what happened once Kushner got the deal? That’s right! Trump stopped supporting the blockade. Could Trump had changed his stance in exchange for a $1.2 billion lease deal for his Son-in-law and Daughter? Of course it’s possible. But Joe Biden holding a strong stance that went along with nearly all politicians in government, concerning the Ukrainian prosecutor, is “corrupt,” right? Jared Kushner and Donald Trump, after years of pro-Saudi policy, got over $2 billion combined from the Saudi government after leaving office. Could that be repayment for their political favors? Could it be pre-payment incase Trump gets back in the WH? Or course it could be. Ivanka Trump, literally got trademark deals while she was dining with the Chinese President, all while working in the WH, and just as Trump changed his stance on the Chinese ZTE deal that would benefit China. Could the trademarks have come as a push by China to try and convince Trump to support the ZTE deal? Of course it could be. Did Trump change his stance on the ZTE deal because Ivanka got the trademarks? Or course it’s possible. No, there is no absolute proof that these deals were in exchange for policy favors, but if you are going to theorize that Hunter Biden took money in exchange for Joe Biden changing policy, yet not say a single word about the Trump family, then you are simply a hypocrite. Jamie Raskin wants to come up with some common sense laws to try and prevent family members of Presidents and VPs from making money overseas like Hunter Biden and the Trump’s did while in office. Why won’t Republicans come to the table? Probably because they don’t want to stop Trump from doing business in the WH again if he becomes President again. Can’t we all agree that this is a bad look for America, no matter who is doing it?
2:18

Jamie Raskin makes a good point to Chuck Todd today. If Hunter Biden took a job and he got those jobs because foreign companies thought it would be beneficial to them because his Father was VP, then it was wrong (not illegal) for Hunter to take that job. Meanwhile, we can also say the same about the following: Donald Trump literally sold hundreds of hotel rooms to foreign government who didn’t even stay in the hotels. How do we know those governments didn’t use Trump’s hotels to pay Trump for favors? Why would they stay at Trump hotels and not a hotel down the road? To many it would seem obvious that it was because they had hopes for political favors. Donald Trump Jr.’s good friend and foreign business partner Gentry Beach not only got to meet with Donald Trump, but he also got invited to the WH to take part in private White House meetings. He got invited to meet with the top National Security Council officials in the US and pushed them to make policy decisions that would be beneficial to his personal businesses. But Joe Biden meeting with Hunter’s business partners, even though there is no evidence that he discussed business with them, is “corrupt,” right? Jared Kushner secured a $1.2 Billion lease deal from a company that was owned in large part by the Qatari government just as Trump was supporting an anti-Qatari Middle Eastern Blockade of Qatar. Why would they invest in Jared Kushner’s building when there were literally dozens of other buildings to invest into? Could it be that they wanted Trump to stop supporting the blockade? Do you know what happened once Kushner got the deal? That’s right! Trump stopped supporting the blockade. Could Trump had changed his stance in exchange for a $1.2 billion lease deal for his Son-in-law and Daughter? Of course it’s possible. But Joe Biden holding a strong stance that went along with nearly all politicians in government, concerning the Ukrainian prosecutor, is “corrupt,” right? Jared Kushner and Donald Trump, after years of pro-Saudi policy, got over $2 billion combined from the Saudi government after leaving office. Could that be repayment for their political favors? Could it be pre-payment incase Trump gets back in the WH? Or course it could be. Ivanka Trump, literally got trademark deals while she was dining with the Chinese President, all while working in the WH, and just as Trump changed his stance on the Chinese ZTE deal that would benefit China. Could the trademarks have come as a push by China to try and convince Trump to support the ZTE deal? Of course it could be. Did Trump change his stance on the ZTE deal because Ivanka got the trademarks? Or course it’s possible. No, there is no absolute proof that these deals were in exchange for policy favors, but if you are going to theorize that Hunter Biden took money in exchange for Joe Biden changing policy, yet not say a single word about the Trump family, then you are simply a hypocrite. Jamie Raskin wants to come up with some common sense laws to try and prevent family members of Presidents and VPs from making money overseas like Hunter Biden and the Trump’s did while in office. Why won’t Republicans come to the table? Probably because they don’t want to stop Trump from doing business in the WH again if he becomes President again. Can’t we all agree that this is a bad look for America, no matter who is doing it?

Ed Krassenstein

2,935,856 次观看 • 3 年前

“SeaKing To VeryDarkMan: In The Video You Made, You Claimed You Got That Information From a Closed WhatsApp Group Where Sowore Is, And That It Was Written By Him. Meanwhile, You Actually Took That Write-Up From X And Edited It To Blackmail Sowore. Since You Started This ‘Unmasking’ Of Sowore, Every Piece Of Evidence You’ve Presented Has Been Usel€ss. Now You Claim You Have Evidence That Will Destroy Him, Yet You Don’t Want Release It. If You Truly Have It, Then You Must Drop It, VeryDaftMan.” 👀
2:44

“SeaKing To VeryDarkMan: In The Video You Made, You Claimed You Got That Information From a Closed WhatsApp Group Where Sowore Is, And That It Was Written By Him. Meanwhile, You Actually Took That Write-Up From X And Edited It To Blackmail Sowore. Since You Started This ‘Unmasking’ Of Sowore, Every Piece Of Evidence You’ve Presented Has Been Usel€ss. Now You Claim You Have Evidence That Will Destroy Him, Yet You Don’t Want Release It. If You Truly Have It, Then You Must Drop It, VeryDaftMan.” 👀

Somto Okonkwo

32,285 次观看 • 3 个月前

Reporter: You have made so clear how you want to keep drugs out of the US— Trump: Right Reporter: Can you explain why you would pardon a notorious drug trafficker? Trump: I don’t know who you are talking about Reporter: Juan Orlando Hernandez Trump: Many of the people of Honduras said it was a Biden setup. I looked at the facts and agreed with them. Reporter: What evidence can you share that it was a setup? Trump: You can take any country you want, if somebody sells drugs in that country, that doesn’t mean you arrest the president and put him in jail for the rest of his life.
1:26

Reporter: You have made so clear how you want to keep drugs out of the US— Trump: Right Reporter: Can you explain why you would pardon a notorious drug trafficker? Trump: I don’t know who you are talking about Reporter: Juan Orlando Hernandez Trump: Many of the people of Honduras said it was a Biden setup. I looked at the facts and agreed with them. Reporter: What evidence can you share that it was a setup? Trump: You can take any country you want, if somebody sells drugs in that country, that doesn’t mean you arrest the president and put him in jail for the rest of his life.

Acyn

4,199,950 次观看 • 8 个月前

BREAKING - SHOCKING: Judge Juan Merchan just instructed the jury that they do not need unanimity to convict and do not need to agree on what specifically occurred. He said the prosecution's broad approach is due to the absence of direct evidence that Donald Trump personally recorded the material in question. "They're making this very expansive," CNN legal analyst said, "because they don't have direct evidence that Donald Trump actually recorded that." WATCH She said, "Even if he himself did not falsify the business record, as long as, as they mentioned in the closing argument, if he made or caused the false entry. They're making this very expansive as part of the cast analogy. He doesn't have to be the person to have actually recorded it. That's very important because they don't have the direct evidence that Donald Trump actually recorded that information. You have invoices, you've got ledgers, you've got checks. And so as long as he was a part of it to make or cause it, they could find, if they choose to, beyond a reasonable doubt."
0:33

BREAKING - SHOCKING: Judge Juan Merchan just instructed the jury that they do not need unanimity to convict and do not need to agree on what specifically occurred. He said the prosecution's broad approach is due to the absence of direct evidence that Donald Trump personally recorded the material in question. "They're making this very expansive," CNN legal analyst said, "because they don't have direct evidence that Donald Trump actually recorded that." WATCH She said, "Even if he himself did not falsify the business record, as long as, as they mentioned in the closing argument, if he made or caused the false entry. They're making this very expansive as part of the cast analogy. He doesn't have to be the person to have actually recorded it. That's very important because they don't have the direct evidence that Donald Trump actually recorded that information. You have invoices, you've got ledgers, you've got checks. And so as long as he was a part of it to make or cause it, they could find, if they choose to, beyond a reasonable doubt."

Simon Ateba

2,906,819 次观看 • 2 年前

"There's this feeling that Leopold was the one with the *courage* to take all this risk, or something." "But even that falls flat on a hedge fund manager, I'm afraid." Numerai founder Richard Craib: "Because it's like, someone goes all-in with pocket sevens. And he doubles his money." "Have you learned anything about his courage, or his skill, really? It's a bit foolish." "I also used to think this. I was a young hedge fund manager. I was a 28-year-old hedge fund manager. And I did also have this perception that, surely these big hedge funds are just so risk averse that, for psychological reasons, they refuse to take enough risk." "And I've come to learn that they're taking nearly the exact amount of risk that you should take." "Because these things are mathematical. There's a right amount of risk to take if you have a certain Sharpe ratio. And those numbers are smaller than you think if you want to run money for a very long time." "Leopold was up 400% in H1 of 2026. Well, Warren Buffett was up 5 million percent by basically being sensible for a very long time." "Do you want to do 400%, then lose everything? Or do you want to do the 5 million percent that takes 30 years?" "It's not that some people are unwilling to take risk. It's that they are already taking risk. It's just a small part of their portfolio."
3:57

"There's this feeling that Leopold was the one with the *courage* to take all this risk, or something." "But even that falls flat on a hedge fund manager, I'm afraid." Numerai founder Richard Craib: "Because it's like, someone goes all-in with pocket sevens. And he doubles his money." "Have you learned anything about his courage, or his skill, really? It's a bit foolish." "I also used to think this. I was a young hedge fund manager. I was a 28-year-old hedge fund manager. And I did also have this perception that, surely these big hedge funds are just so risk averse that, for psychological reasons, they refuse to take enough risk." "And I've come to learn that they're taking nearly the exact amount of risk that you should take." "Because these things are mathematical. There's a right amount of risk to take if you have a certain Sharpe ratio. And those numbers are smaller than you think if you want to run money for a very long time." "Leopold was up 400% in H1 of 2026. Well, Warren Buffett was up 5 million percent by basically being sensible for a very long time." "Do you want to do 400%, then lose everything? Or do you want to do the 5 million percent that takes 30 years?" "It's not that some people are unwilling to take risk. It's that they are already taking risk. It's just a small part of their portfolio."

TBPN

38,818 次观看 • 2 天前

NBC News’ Kristen Welker: “The Danish foreign minister says there hasn’t been a Chinese warship in Greenland for a decade. What evidence do you have that this is a pressing threat?” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: “We have asymmetric information. And again, President Trump is being strategic here. What evidence was there that the Russians were going into Crimea? Well, actually there was a lot of evidence that the Russians were going to go into Ukraine. And Joe Biden said, ‘Well, just take a little bit of it.’” “But what we know is that the U.S., that Greenland can only be defended it if is part of the U.S. And it will not need to be defended if it is part of the U.S. The president is trying to avoid a conflict.”
0:56

NBC News’ Kristen Welker: “The Danish foreign minister says there hasn’t been a Chinese warship in Greenland for a decade. What evidence do you have that this is a pressing threat?” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: “We have asymmetric information. And again, President Trump is being strategic here. What evidence was there that the Russians were going into Crimea? Well, actually there was a lot of evidence that the Russians were going to go into Ukraine. And Joe Biden said, ‘Well, just take a little bit of it.’” “But what we know is that the U.S., that Greenland can only be defended it if is part of the U.S. And it will not need to be defended if it is part of the U.S. The president is trying to avoid a conflict.”

RedWave Press

976,173 次观看 • 6 个月前

Reporter: “You’ve made so clear how you want to keep drugs out of the U.S. Can you explain more about why you would pardon a notorious drug trafficker?… Juan Orlando Hernandez.” President Trump: “I was asked by many of the people of Honduras. They said it was a Biden setup…. They said it was a Biden administration setup. I looked at the facts and agreed with them.” Reporter: “What evidence can you share that he was setup?” President Trump: “You can take any country you want, if somebody sells drugs in that country, that doesn’t mean you arrest the president and put him in jail for the rest of his life.” “That includes this country.”
1:25

Reporter: “You’ve made so clear how you want to keep drugs out of the U.S. Can you explain more about why you would pardon a notorious drug trafficker?… Juan Orlando Hernandez.” President Trump: “I was asked by many of the people of Honduras. They said it was a Biden setup…. They said it was a Biden administration setup. I looked at the facts and agreed with them.” Reporter: “What evidence can you share that he was setup?” President Trump: “You can take any country you want, if somebody sells drugs in that country, that doesn’t mean you arrest the president and put him in jail for the rest of his life.” “That includes this country.”

RedWave Press

55,961 次观看 • 8 个月前

Ana Navarro on Trump’s 2020 election lies: “Nobody around Trump has the spine to say to him you are lying, you are insane. If Joe Biden has been claiming without any evidence for six years that he did not lose the election, men in white coats would have rushed the stage and put a straitjacket on him. Somehow we have gotten used to an insane president that either doesn’t have the mental capacity or is lying or both”
2:05

Ana Navarro on Trump’s 2020 election lies: “Nobody around Trump has the spine to say to him you are lying, you are insane. If Joe Biden has been claiming without any evidence for six years that he did not lose the election, men in white coats would have rushed the stage and put a straitjacket on him. Somehow we have gotten used to an insane president that either doesn’t have the mental capacity or is lying or both”

Marco Foster

71,227 次观看 • 18 天前

Fox News just continues with a narrative even though there is absolutely no “there“ there. Who cares if Joe Biden was “the big guy” Joe Biden was a private citizen at the time, as was Hunter Biden. It was perfectly legal if Joe Biden was doing business with his son Hunter, but the problem is, there is no proof of that. In fact, there is evidence to the contrary. The deal that was referenced in calling Joe Biden “the big guy” never actually went through. Who cares if Joe Biden ate a spaghetti dinner with Hunter Biden’s business partner? I eat dinner with my kids schoolmates all the time. That doesn’t mean that we’re talking about school. Donald Trump Junior’s business partner literally was invited to the White House to meet Trump. No one got upset about that, did they? Fact is the GOP narrative has collapsed. And now they’re too afraid to admit it.
0:50

Fox News just continues with a narrative even though there is absolutely no “there“ there. Who cares if Joe Biden was “the big guy” Joe Biden was a private citizen at the time, as was Hunter Biden. It was perfectly legal if Joe Biden was doing business with his son Hunter, but the problem is, there is no proof of that. In fact, there is evidence to the contrary. The deal that was referenced in calling Joe Biden “the big guy” never actually went through. Who cares if Joe Biden ate a spaghetti dinner with Hunter Biden’s business partner? I eat dinner with my kids schoolmates all the time. That doesn’t mean that we’re talking about school. Donald Trump Junior’s business partner literally was invited to the White House to meet Trump. No one got upset about that, did they? Fact is the GOP narrative has collapsed. And now they’re too afraid to admit it.

Ed Krassenstein

481,687 次观看 • 2 年前

Senator Janae Shamp reads a quote in her opening statement "Didn’t ask for evidence when they told you to social distance. You just did it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they told you to stay home for two weeks. You just did it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they told you to mask up. You just did it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they told local businesses to close down. You just went along with it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they pulled your kid out of school. You just went along with it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they scared you with terms like “super spreader.” You just went along with it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they said you couldn’t visit the nursing home. You just went along with it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they said the funeral would have to be via Zoom call. You just went along with it. Didn’t ask for evidence when you followed the arrows on the floor at the grocery store. You just did it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they promised the shot was “safe and effective.” You just believed it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they said “Just the one shot.” You just went ahead and got it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they said “We meant two shots to get your life back.” You just went ahead and got it…again. Didn’t ask for evidence when they said “Our bad, you’ll need a booster every year.” You just got back in line for more of it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they said “We meant boost a few times a year.” You just nodded your head in agreement because look how far you’ve come. You can’t go back now. Oh but if someone tells you any of that was horrible and wrong and it’s ruined millions of lives… you’re going to need to see some “evidence” of it." full Novel Coronavirus Southwestern Intergovernmental Committee March 15,2024 hearing below
3:24

Senator Janae Shamp reads a quote in her opening statement "Didn’t ask for evidence when they told you to social distance. You just did it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they told you to stay home for two weeks. You just did it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they told you to mask up. You just did it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they told local businesses to close down. You just went along with it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they pulled your kid out of school. You just went along with it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they scared you with terms like “super spreader.” You just went along with it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they said you couldn’t visit the nursing home. You just went along with it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they said the funeral would have to be via Zoom call. You just went along with it. Didn’t ask for evidence when you followed the arrows on the floor at the grocery store. You just did it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they promised the shot was “safe and effective.” You just believed it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they said “Just the one shot.” You just went ahead and got it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they said “We meant two shots to get your life back.” You just went ahead and got it…again. Didn’t ask for evidence when they said “Our bad, you’ll need a booster every year.” You just got back in line for more of it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they said “We meant boost a few times a year.” You just nodded your head in agreement because look how far you’ve come. You can’t go back now. Oh but if someone tells you any of that was horrible and wrong and it’s ruined millions of lives… you’re going to need to see some “evidence” of it." full Novel Coronavirus Southwestern Intergovernmental Committee March 15,2024 hearing below

DoctorRay

59,236 次观看 • 2 年前

No one witnessed Tyler Robinson. No video or any witness testimony of him, a gun, or any forensic evidence at all. Except dna on a rifle he owned that wasn’t tested for residue and did not alert any of the dogs. The footage never shows a gun or a clear shot of his face. It appears to be multiple people or he changes outfits. There is no evidence matching any bullet to the gun they claim was used. The only “evidence” they have are text messages that don’t sound real that have not been made available to the defense to analyze. Text messages can be sent by anyone. That isn’t evidence. And a confession that doesn’t exist and a claim his mother recognized him from the footage that we now can all see. That statement has not been made available and probably doesn’t exist, and it doesn’t matter. The video doesn’t show any crime and it’s not clear enough for any positive ID. There are mountains of circumstantial evidence that turning point USA conspired to either kill Charlie Kirk or cover up his murder. There is an end times cult that is convinced that in order to bring back Jesus they need the US to lose to Iran and the world to turn on Israel and burn. That’s a fact btw. That’s what Ben Shapiro and Trump and kushner and the “pastors” surrounding Charlie believe. They are claiming anyone that is NOT in their world destroying death cult is in fact in Candace Owens cult. People who don’t think Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk and Erika is a crazy bitch. Everything I just said is obviously accurate. It never ends well for death cults. This is not the first and it’s not the last. I recommend staying far far away as they destroy themselves
1:26

No one witnessed Tyler Robinson. No video or any witness testimony of him, a gun, or any forensic evidence at all. Except dna on a rifle he owned that wasn’t tested for residue and did not alert any of the dogs. The footage never shows a gun or a clear shot of his face. It appears to be multiple people or he changes outfits. There is no evidence matching any bullet to the gun they claim was used. The only “evidence” they have are text messages that don’t sound real that have not been made available to the defense to analyze. Text messages can be sent by anyone. That isn’t evidence. And a confession that doesn’t exist and a claim his mother recognized him from the footage that we now can all see. That statement has not been made available and probably doesn’t exist, and it doesn’t matter. The video doesn’t show any crime and it’s not clear enough for any positive ID. There are mountains of circumstantial evidence that turning point USA conspired to either kill Charlie Kirk or cover up his murder. There is an end times cult that is convinced that in order to bring back Jesus they need the US to lose to Iran and the world to turn on Israel and burn. That’s a fact btw. That’s what Ben Shapiro and Trump and kushner and the “pastors” surrounding Charlie believe. They are claiming anyone that is NOT in their world destroying death cult is in fact in Candace Owens cult. People who don’t think Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk and Erika is a crazy bitch. Everything I just said is obviously accurate. It never ends well for death cults. This is not the first and it’s not the last. I recommend staying far far away as they destroy themselves

Owen Benjamin 🐻

72,262 次观看 • 25 天前

Rufai Oseni: “Arabambi said you took a lot of money from Labour Party donations during the last election, and he claims to have evidence.” Mr Peter Obi: “If the so-called Arabambi can provide evidence from any account showing that even 1 percent of what he alleged is missing, I will stop campaigning for the 2027 election. In fact, I may add him to the lawsuit so he can come to court and provide the evidence, just that he don't have address.”
2:14

Rufai Oseni: “Arabambi said you took a lot of money from Labour Party donations during the last election, and he claims to have evidence.” Mr Peter Obi: “If the so-called Arabambi can provide evidence from any account showing that even 1 percent of what he alleged is missing, I will stop campaigning for the 2027 election. In fact, I may add him to the lawsuit so he can come to court and provide the evidence, just that he don't have address.”

CHUKS 🍥

854,113 次观看 • 1 个月前

WOW 🚨 Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard says the Democrats CHANGED THE STANDARD for impeachment right before impeaching Trump They changed it so evidence no longer had to be credible, just to get Trump Literally Treason “So in the lead up to the impeachment of President Trump, the standard was, it had to be firsthand information. And then right before he happened to go through this impeachment process, the standard changed to being able to use secondhand information, even if it were unreliable and deemed unreliable” “Inspector General did from requiring that there be either evidence or firsthand knowledge presented in order to determine whether or not a complaint is credible to merely allowing for hearsay and nothing else” “How do you find a complaint to be credible when there is zero evidence provided and there is zero firsthand knowledge provided, not only by the whistleblower, by any witness in this case and when the Inspector General himself did not even request to see the documents that these individuals are referencing in their false accusations” Democrats literally changed it so it didn’t have to be first hand knowledge, and you need no evidence to make a claim for impeachment And not a single person has been held accountable for this
1:36

WOW 🚨 Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard says the Democrats CHANGED THE STANDARD for impeachment right before impeaching Trump They changed it so evidence no longer had to be credible, just to get Trump Literally Treason “So in the lead up to the impeachment of President Trump, the standard was, it had to be firsthand information. And then right before he happened to go through this impeachment process, the standard changed to being able to use secondhand information, even if it were unreliable and deemed unreliable” “Inspector General did from requiring that there be either evidence or firsthand knowledge presented in order to determine whether or not a complaint is credible to merely allowing for hearsay and nothing else” “How do you find a complaint to be credible when there is zero evidence provided and there is zero firsthand knowledge provided, not only by the whistleblower, by any witness in this case and when the Inspector General himself did not even request to see the documents that these individuals are referencing in their false accusations” Democrats literally changed it so it didn’t have to be first hand knowledge, and you need no evidence to make a claim for impeachment And not a single person has been held accountable for this

Wall Street Apes

393,061 次观看 • 3 个月前

Do you know who tried to create policy to prevent immigrants from seeking asylum in the United States if they first passed through another country like Mexico? PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN. The ACLU then sued his administration, claiming that it is illegal. Do you know who tried to require border patrol to hold migrants until they have been given a notice to appear in court? PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN. So Republicans need to stop claiming that Biden can fix this problem through executive actions. He can't. He's trying to do that, but the law keeps getting in the way. We need Congress to pass new laws, and Republicans in Congress are not doing so.
0:31

Do you know who tried to create policy to prevent immigrants from seeking asylum in the United States if they first passed through another country like Mexico? PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN. The ACLU then sued his administration, claiming that it is illegal. Do you know who tried to require border patrol to hold migrants until they have been given a notice to appear in court? PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN. So Republicans need to stop claiming that Biden can fix this problem through executive actions. He can't. He's trying to do that, but the law keeps getting in the way. We need Congress to pass new laws, and Republicans in Congress are not doing so.

Ed Krassenstein

947,379 次观看 • 2 年前

ว่าด้วยเป้าหมายในชีวิต ได้ข้อคิดอะไรเยอะมากจากไลฟ์คุณอฟ "If you've lost your passion for life, whether it's about work or anything, try setting new goals for yourself. For example, you might set a goal of having teeth braces by this year, then you can save up for it or let's say, you want to have a motorcycle, then start saving up. In case that you think you have all the stuff you need, let's think about things that you don't have. It might be having some travels like this year I'll go to this/that place. It's important that you keep setting new goals for yourself. Do not ever lose your passion unless you've everything completely fulfilled . In that case you can just do nothing and live a comfortable life. For me, these are goals that I've set. 31-year-old Engfa will have her own business. It might or might not happen but the point is you need to have a goal. And when I turn 35, I will stop working for one year and travel around the world using the money that I've specifically saved up for travel. A whole year of travel when I'm 35." #อิงฟ้ามหาชน #EngfaWaraha
1:14

ว่าด้วยเป้าหมายในชีวิต ได้ข้อคิดอะไรเยอะมากจากไลฟ์คุณอฟ "If you've lost your passion for life, whether it's about work or anything, try setting new goals for yourself. For example, you might set a goal of having teeth braces by this year, then you can save up for it or let's say, you want to have a motorcycle, then start saving up. In case that you think you have all the stuff you need, let's think about things that you don't have. It might be having some travels like this year I'll go to this/that place. It's important that you keep setting new goals for yourself. Do not ever lose your passion unless you've everything completely fulfilled . In that case you can just do nothing and live a comfortable life. For me, these are goals that I've set. 31-year-old Engfa will have her own business. It might or might not happen but the point is you need to have a goal. And when I turn 35, I will stop working for one year and travel around the world using the money that I've specifically saved up for travel. A whole year of travel when I'm 35." #อิงฟ้ามหาชน #EngfaWaraha

Me_Myself_and_I

33,430 次观看 • 7 个月前

Byron Donalds Shuts Down Joe Biden’s Attempt to Backtrack on “Garbage” Remark Joe Biden just called Trump supporters “garbage,” and now he’s saying that he was talking about Tony Hinchcliffe, not you. But Byron Donalds isn’t buying it, and he brought the receipts to prove Biden is full of BS. “He thinks that they [Trump supporters] are garbage. That’s a fact. And what I go back to is four years ago, around this same time, it was Joe Biden that went on the Breakfast Club and famously said that if you couldn’t vote for him, then you weren’t Black. It’s the same Joe Biden making the same type of statement four years ago. So this is consistent with who he is.” Donalds nailed it.
0:39

Byron Donalds Shuts Down Joe Biden’s Attempt to Backtrack on “Garbage” Remark Joe Biden just called Trump supporters “garbage,” and now he’s saying that he was talking about Tony Hinchcliffe, not you. But Byron Donalds isn’t buying it, and he brought the receipts to prove Biden is full of BS. “He thinks that they [Trump supporters] are garbage. That’s a fact. And what I go back to is four years ago, around this same time, it was Joe Biden that went on the Breakfast Club and famously said that if you couldn’t vote for him, then you weren’t Black. It’s the same Joe Biden making the same type of statement four years ago. So this is consistent with who he is.” Donalds nailed it.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,528,364 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 FLASHBACK: Saifedean Ammous explains Bitcoin with Jordan Peterson: “To get electricity from the north of Ontario to Toronto needs a lot of wires, or you need to, if it was gas, you need to put it on tankers or on trains or in pipelines. All of that stuff is pretty expensive. But with Bitcoin, you just need an internet connection. You take the Bitcoin miners to where that energy is, and then you can monetize that energy and turn it into Bitcoin. It’s magic.”
0:25

🚨 FLASHBACK: Saifedean Ammous explains Bitcoin with Jordan Peterson: “To get electricity from the north of Ontario to Toronto needs a lot of wires, or you need to, if it was gas, you need to put it on tankers or on trains or in pipelines. All of that stuff is pretty expensive. But with Bitcoin, you just need an internet connection. You take the Bitcoin miners to where that energy is, and then you can monetize that energy and turn it into Bitcoin. It’s magic.”

Cointelegraph

47,177 次观看 • 1 年前

Collins: Is that common knowledge about Trump trying to assist in the Epstein investigation? Have you seen any evidence of that? Crockett: That's the first time I heard of it. So I'm gonna say, no, I don't have any documentation to that effect. And I was able to sit down during the Barr deposition. And so I would imagine that he would have the information as it relates to who the informants were and that kind of stuff. And I can just tell you point blank that it never came up, that the president somehow was an informant for the FBI.
1:18

Collins: Is that common knowledge about Trump trying to assist in the Epstein investigation? Have you seen any evidence of that? Crockett: That's the first time I heard of it. So I'm gonna say, no, I don't have any documentation to that effect. And I was able to sit down during the Barr deposition. And so I would imagine that he would have the information as it relates to who the informants were and that kind of stuff. And I can just tell you point blank that it never came up, that the president somehow was an informant for the FBI.

Acyn

270,255 次观看 • 10 个月前

Martin Shkreli says running a hedge fund is the worst job in finance, that a newsletter doing $50 million of revenue beats almost every fund on the planet, and that people only take the job because it's the "sexiest thing" being master of the universe. "I have a friend who wants to start a hedge fund. I told him, this is the most painful, horrible business in the world. Why do this?" "If you start a newsletter business that makes $100 million a year, even $50 million a year of revenue, you've done better than almost every hedge fund on the planet." "You do not want to do this job." "And the reason people do it, and I did it too, and I would never do it again, is it's the sexiest thing in the world. You think you're the master of the universe..." "It's waking up at 3 a.m. checking Korean stock prices and waking back up at 6 wondering what's happening in the world."
0:48

Martin Shkreli says running a hedge fund is the worst job in finance, that a newsletter doing $50 million of revenue beats almost every fund on the planet, and that people only take the job because it's the "sexiest thing" being master of the universe. "I have a friend who wants to start a hedge fund. I told him, this is the most painful, horrible business in the world. Why do this?" "If you start a newsletter business that makes $100 million a year, even $50 million a year of revenue, you've done better than almost every hedge fund on the planet." "You do not want to do this job." "And the reason people do it, and I did it too, and I would never do it again, is it's the sexiest thing in the world. You think you're the master of the universe..." "It's waking up at 3 a.m. checking Korean stock prices and waking back up at 6 wondering what's happening in the world."

Fireside Alpha

203,781 次观看 • 3 天前