Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

the second a man cums the cunt becomes useless it's not worth keeping anymore just another trash to thrown away #nsfw #submissive #rape #rapekink #cnckink #cnc #misogyny #misogynistic #roughporn #bdsm #misogynykink #patriarchy #porn #humiliation #degrading #sadist #whore #abuse

Rxpist

2,335 subscribers

12,224 次观看 • 13 天前 •via X (Twitter)

NSFW #nsfw #submissive #rape #rapekink #cnckink #cnc #misogyny #misogynistic #roughporn #bdsm #misogynykink #patriarchy #porn #humiliation #degrading #sadist #whore #abuse

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Let's ignore the part where she consented to sex with guys who were more drunk than her. Can we start saying "it's all women" because there are women downplaying male rape victims by saying "women can't rape" or "he must've secretly wanted it" or "it's not that as bad as it's for women". Or because there are women excusing another woman for killing her children, saying "same, Lindsay". Or saying "he probably did something" when they see a woman abuse a man. Then suddenly it's wrong to judge all women because of the actions of a few. Then it's suddenly a different story. Women are commiting rape about the same rates as men, it's just downplayed so much that y'all believe men are the majority commiting rape. And "well, she was drunk" means her actions doesn't matter because she couldn't consent yet the guys who were more drunk than her means they should've done something about it. I assume at a frat party that everyone is gonna be drunk. Yet, only men are expected to make the right decisions while women are lifted from any accountability. Treating us as the weaker sex when it benefits or can make you a victim has to stop.

Let's ignore the part where she consented to sex with guys who were more drunk than her. Can we start saying "it's all women" because there are women downplaying male rape victims by saying "women can't rape" or "he must've secretly wanted it" or "it's not that as bad as it's for women". Or because there are women excusing another woman for killing her children, saying "same, Lindsay". Or saying "he probably did something" when they see a woman abuse a man. Then suddenly it's wrong to judge all women because of the actions of a few. Then it's suddenly a different story. Women are commiting rape about the same rates as men, it's just downplayed so much that y'all believe men are the majority commiting rape. And "well, she was drunk" means her actions doesn't matter because she couldn't consent yet the guys who were more drunk than her means they should've done something about it. I assume at a frat party that everyone is gonna be drunk. Yet, only men are expected to make the right decisions while women are lifted from any accountability. Treating us as the weaker sex when it benefits or can make you a victim has to stop.

Becky🏴‍☠️⚓️

13,567 次观看 • 8 天前

Alberta boots graphic smut from school libraries—media cries 'book banning' This isn't censorship. It's protection. It's sanity. It's Alberta saying: Not our kids. Not anymore. It's not censorship to keep dick-wagging, gender-wang books out of the hands of little kids. And if you disagree, honestly, your hard drive—and your head—need a full forensic scan. Alberta's government just took the most reasonable step imaginable: keeping graphic sexual content—some of it too obscene to show adults at a press conference—out of school libraries meant for children. These books are too graphic to show you in this video, but I will include a link to the Alberta government Dropbox so you can see them for yourself. And the response to that smart move to keep smut away from little ones? Media meltdown. NDP hysteria. Establishment freakout. Let's run the highlight reel: ⚫️Alberta media had access to that same government Dropbox full of these explicit book excerpts before the press conference. They saw the strap-ons, blowjob sexts, group cum dares—the whole parade of degeneracy… and still called it "book banning." Absolute weirdos. ⚫️A former cabinet minister in Alberta, Thomas Lukaszuk, asked where the "book burning" event would be—because, apparently, saying "maybe 5-year-olds shouldn't read about sex toys" now makes you Hitler. ⚫️A Sportsnet journalist, Mark Spector—yes, really—chimed in with, "Who asked for this?" Mark, buddy, parents asked. You know, the people whose kids are being handed cartoon porn by government-paid librarians. ⚫️And the cherry on top? An Alberta NDP MLA, Lori Sigurdson, rushed to condemn the move, defending, let's be clear here, keeping graphic pornography available to elementary-age students. That's the hill they want to die on: "Let the little kids have the porn." Let me be absolutely clear: This isn't about banning books. It's about banning garbage. It's about saying: "No, Grade 3 kids don't need to read about strap-ons and oral sex during library time." If it's too graphic for the 6 o'clock news, it's too graphic for a six-year-old. The freaks defending this filth are so far removed from normal people, they might as well be speaking Martian. Normal people—parents—don't want their kids reading "vagina slime" erotica at school. This isn't censorship. It's protection. It's sanity. It's Alberta saying: Not our kids. Not anymore. Not today, Satan.

Sensitive content

Alberta boots graphic smut from school libraries—media cries 'book banning' This isn't censorship. It's protection. It's sanity. It's Alberta saying: Not our kids. Not anymore. It's not censorship to keep dick-wagging, gender-wang books out of the hands of little kids. And if you disagree, honestly, your hard drive—and your head—need a full forensic scan. Alberta's government just took the most reasonable step imaginable: keeping graphic sexual content—some of it too obscene to show adults at a press conference—out of school libraries meant for children. These books are too graphic to show you in this video, but I will include a link to the Alberta government Dropbox so you can see them for yourself. And the response to that smart move to keep smut away from little ones? Media meltdown. NDP hysteria. Establishment freakout. Let's run the highlight reel: ⚫️Alberta media had access to that same government Dropbox full of these explicit book excerpts before the press conference. They saw the strap-ons, blowjob sexts, group cum dares—the whole parade of degeneracy… and still called it "book banning." Absolute weirdos. ⚫️A former cabinet minister in Alberta, Thomas Lukaszuk, asked where the "book burning" event would be—because, apparently, saying "maybe 5-year-olds shouldn't read about sex toys" now makes you Hitler. ⚫️A Sportsnet journalist, Mark Spector—yes, really—chimed in with, "Who asked for this?" Mark, buddy, parents asked. You know, the people whose kids are being handed cartoon porn by government-paid librarians. ⚫️And the cherry on top? An Alberta NDP MLA, Lori Sigurdson, rushed to condemn the move, defending, let's be clear here, keeping graphic pornography available to elementary-age students. That's the hill they want to die on: "Let the little kids have the porn." Let me be absolutely clear: This isn't about banning books. It's about banning garbage. It's about saying: "No, Grade 3 kids don't need to read about strap-ons and oral sex during library time." If it's too graphic for the 6 o'clock news, it's too graphic for a six-year-old. The freaks defending this filth are so far removed from normal people, they might as well be speaking Martian. Normal people—parents—don't want their kids reading "vagina slime" erotica at school. This isn't censorship. It's protection. It's sanity. It's Alberta saying: Not our kids. Not anymore. Not today, Satan.

Rebel News

68,068 次观看 • 1 年前

NBC's Matt Gorman on Graham Platner... "I think Susan Collins is going to beat him like a drum, and I believe that even before the story came out yesterday. I mean, you're right. This was an incredible story with, you know, abuse allegations and infidelity. Two of the other things I took away from it, besides he just seems to be a liar, is the fact that (a) his comments that he did not dispute about if someone broke into his apartment, he would quote, he would essentially rape them, and it was about dominance, not sex. Incredible. What an egregious, awful statement to make. And the other thing is, to Megan's point, it's a further confirmation past a CNN article a few weeks ago that he knew what the Nazi tattoo was and did not dispute that until he disputed it with Chris Hayes last night as well." "And I think part of the anger you get from some in the GOP is we remember folks like what Sheldon Whitehouse did during the Kavanaugh hearings when he went five questions deep on what 'boofing' was. And yesterday, when stopped in a hallway, he said the story was a lot of nothing. And so it's the -- a -- morality on someone like his part when we -- there's one standard when it was Kavanaugh in 2018 and quite another when it's Graham Platner." "Infidelity? I will not condone that. Whether it's Graham Platner or Ken Paxton. I haven't heard allegations Ken Paxton abusing women. I haven't heard Ken Paxton going on kik, which is, quote, called 'a paradise for child predators.' I won't excuse infidelity, but I'm also not going to draw a line between Graham Platner's abuse -- abuse allegations and what Ken Paxton did either."

NBC's Matt Gorman on Graham Platner... "I think Susan Collins is going to beat him like a drum, and I believe that even before the story came out yesterday. I mean, you're right. This was an incredible story with, you know, abuse allegations and infidelity. Two of the other things I took away from it, besides he just seems to be a liar, is the fact that (a) his comments that he did not dispute about if someone broke into his apartment, he would quote, he would essentially rape them, and it was about dominance, not sex. Incredible. What an egregious, awful statement to make. And the other thing is, to Megan's point, it's a further confirmation past a CNN article a few weeks ago that he knew what the Nazi tattoo was and did not dispute that until he disputed it with Chris Hayes last night as well." "And I think part of the anger you get from some in the GOP is we remember folks like what Sheldon Whitehouse did during the Kavanaugh hearings when he went five questions deep on what 'boofing' was. And yesterday, when stopped in a hallway, he said the story was a lot of nothing. And so it's the -- a -- morality on someone like his part when we -- there's one standard when it was Kavanaugh in 2018 and quite another when it's Graham Platner." "Infidelity? I will not condone that. Whether it's Graham Platner or Ken Paxton. I haven't heard allegations Ken Paxton abusing women. I haven't heard Ken Paxton going on kik, which is, quote, called 'a paradise for child predators.' I won't excuse infidelity, but I'm also not going to draw a line between Graham Platner's abuse -- abuse allegations and what Ken Paxton did either."

Curtis Houck

248,117 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨BREAKING: In Everett, MA, an ICE agent appears to drop their firearm, while multiple agents are on top of a man…then another agent falsely claims the man was grabbing the gun. In the video, as the gun falls to the ground, and is tossed away from the pile of agents, another agent can be heard yelling, “He grabbed your gun. He grabbed your gun.” Except… the video appears to show the exact opposite. The firearm wasn’t in the man’s hands. It had already been thrown away from the struggle. This is exactly why poorly trained agents are so dangerous. The second someone yells, “He’s got the gun,” every officer on the scene has to make a split-second decision, based on that information. If that information is wrong, you’ve just created a situation where someone could be shot because another agent panicked, or falsely identified what happened. We’ve seen this before with Alex Pretti. Federal agents carrying firearms should be trained well enough not to lose control of their weapon… and certainly not to falsely claim the person they’re arresting has it. We’ve now seen multiple videos of agents dropping magazines, firearms, and handling their weapons in ways that raise serious safety concerns. Every time DHS puts poorly trained agents on the street, with the unlimited power to detain people and carry loaded firearms, they are putting the public, bystanders, and even their own agents at risk. And until there is real accountability for reckless conduct, and inadequate training, these dangerous incidents will keep happening. The public shouldn’t have to wonder whether the biggest threat during an arrest is the person being detained… or the agent carrying the gun.

🚨BREAKING: In Everett, MA, an ICE agent appears to drop their firearm, while multiple agents are on top of a man…then another agent falsely claims the man was grabbing the gun. In the video, as the gun falls to the ground, and is tossed away from the pile of agents, another agent can be heard yelling, “He grabbed your gun. He grabbed your gun.” Except… the video appears to show the exact opposite. The firearm wasn’t in the man’s hands. It had already been thrown away from the struggle. This is exactly why poorly trained agents are so dangerous. The second someone yells, “He’s got the gun,” every officer on the scene has to make a split-second decision, based on that information. If that information is wrong, you’ve just created a situation where someone could be shot because another agent panicked, or falsely identified what happened. We’ve seen this before with Alex Pretti. Federal agents carrying firearms should be trained well enough not to lose control of their weapon… and certainly not to falsely claim the person they’re arresting has it. We’ve now seen multiple videos of agents dropping magazines, firearms, and handling their weapons in ways that raise serious safety concerns. Every time DHS puts poorly trained agents on the street, with the unlimited power to detain people and carry loaded firearms, they are putting the public, bystanders, and even their own agents at risk. And until there is real accountability for reckless conduct, and inadequate training, these dangerous incidents will keep happening. The public shouldn’t have to wonder whether the biggest threat during an arrest is the person being detained… or the agent carrying the gun.

Jesus Freakin Congress

101,293 次观看 • 3 个月前

Another one bites the dust. Conservative MP Richard Martel just resigned his seat so he can take a Senate appointment from Mark Carney. Let that sink in. He was elected to represent his constituents… then he cashed in for a lifetime appointment in the Red Chamber. This is the fifth Conservative MP to walk away from their seat since the last election. No values. No principles. No loyalty. Just self-interest and a better paycheck. Meanwhile, here’s a guy who’s actually had enough and is stepping up to do something about it. He’s running as Ward 1 Councillor in Richmond Hill — and he’s promising exactly what most politicians refuse to deliver anymore: What you see is what you get. No fake politically correct BS. No pretending to be something he’s not. Just straight talk and real accountability. We need more of this. Are 🫵 tired of politicians treating their seat like a stepping stone to a bigger title and fatter pension. Watch this. It’s worth every second. #cdnpoli #CanadaFirst #RichmondHill #AuthenticLeadership #LiberalFail

Another one bites the dust. Conservative MP Richard Martel just resigned his seat so he can take a Senate appointment from Mark Carney. Let that sink in. He was elected to represent his constituents… then he cashed in for a lifetime appointment in the Red Chamber. This is the fifth Conservative MP to walk away from their seat since the last election. No values. No principles. No loyalty. Just self-interest and a better paycheck. Meanwhile, here’s a guy who’s actually had enough and is stepping up to do something about it. He’s running as Ward 1 Councillor in Richmond Hill — and he’s promising exactly what most politicians refuse to deliver anymore: What you see is what you get. No fake politically correct BS. No pretending to be something he’s not. Just straight talk and real accountability. We need more of this. Are 🫵 tired of politicians treating their seat like a stepping stone to a bigger title and fatter pension. Watch this. It’s worth every second. #cdnpoli #CanadaFirst #RichmondHill #AuthenticLeadership #LiberalFail

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

10,728 次观看 • 3 个月前

Rep. Balint on Hegseth's obsession with testosterone, his announcement of testosterone therapy for troops, and his attacks on women in combat: "I think it is indicative of the fact that there are so many people in this administration that have some weird, intense, homoerotic, feelings towards men while also being incredibly homophobic, and not just homophobic, but like hate-mongering, fear-mongering about the LGBTQ community. So, let me be clear. I don't think the homoeroticism is the weird part. The weird part is that they pretend that that's not what it's about. And so, Pete Hegseth is like the example of this, like the manly, manly, rugged, macho man, and it's like, I don't know if you know who Tom of Finland is...this is a gay male porn that was drawn by a man. And, like, Pete Hegseth is the embodiment of that. So I feel like they must be looking at that as their example for what men look like. And in terms of not promoting women, we know what this is all about. The military, whether you support the military-industrial complex or not, it has always been merit-based. The people who are the best of the best rise to the top. And so the fact that he has systematically been keeping down women and people of color gives up the whole game. It's actually not about a merit-based system anymore."

Rep. Balint on Hegseth's obsession with testosterone, his announcement of testosterone therapy for troops, and his attacks on women in combat: "I think it is indicative of the fact that there are so many people in this administration that have some weird, intense, homoerotic, feelings towards men while also being incredibly homophobic, and not just homophobic, but like hate-mongering, fear-mongering about the LGBTQ community. So, let me be clear. I don't think the homoeroticism is the weird part. The weird part is that they pretend that that's not what it's about. And so, Pete Hegseth is like the example of this, like the manly, manly, rugged, macho man, and it's like, I don't know if you know who Tom of Finland is...this is a gay male porn that was drawn by a man. And, like, Pete Hegseth is the embodiment of that. So I feel like they must be looking at that as their example for what men look like. And in terms of not promoting women, we know what this is all about. The military, whether you support the military-industrial complex or not, it has always been merit-based. The people who are the best of the best rise to the top. And so the fact that he has systematically been keeping down women and people of color gives up the whole game. It's actually not about a merit-based system anymore."

MeidasTouch

327,279 次观看 • 2 个月前

I never really quite understood why some women would want to be surrounded by 'losers' that are powerless and worthless. It's one thing to play out a scene where these feelings are explored, it's another to seek these kinds of men to reign over. I am very selective with the energy I let into my field. Someone who doesn't bring any value is a huge liability. Value is not just money. Money is actually the simple baseline that gives the opportunity to request access. But no amount of money is worth being surrounded by someone who drains you energetically, doesn't respect your boundaries, makes you doubt your authority, tries to 'get' something from you by thinking they can just pay their way outside of your established perimeter of play. That ends up costing you more than you would make from such an exchange. Or someone who feels worthless and wants to pay you to validate that on the daily. Then these words become part of you daily speech. Or someone who thinks of themselves as trash... while asking you if you'd own them. Being the one standing tall on top of trash has no appeal to me. But dominating men with power, who know their value, well... that requires to recognize that in them in the first place. Which is where power exchange becomes really potent. Because we start from equal power, but different expressions of it. And we explore receiving, holding and keeping it, and on the other side relinquishing, surrendering, entrusting another with it. You can't relinquish something you don't have. Yet I believe we all have power. So recognizing this in the first place is where it all begins.

I never really quite understood why some women would want to be surrounded by 'losers' that are powerless and worthless. It's one thing to play out a scene where these feelings are explored, it's another to seek these kinds of men to reign over. I am very selective with the energy I let into my field. Someone who doesn't bring any value is a huge liability. Value is not just money. Money is actually the simple baseline that gives the opportunity to request access. But no amount of money is worth being surrounded by someone who drains you energetically, doesn't respect your boundaries, makes you doubt your authority, tries to 'get' something from you by thinking they can just pay their way outside of your established perimeter of play. That ends up costing you more than you would make from such an exchange. Or someone who feels worthless and wants to pay you to validate that on the daily. Then these words become part of you daily speech. Or someone who thinks of themselves as trash... while asking you if you'd own them. Being the one standing tall on top of trash has no appeal to me. But dominating men with power, who know their value, well... that requires to recognize that in them in the first place. Which is where power exchange becomes really potent. Because we start from equal power, but different expressions of it. And we explore receiving, holding and keeping it, and on the other side relinquishing, surrendering, entrusting another with it. You can't relinquish something you don't have. Yet I believe we all have power. So recognizing this in the first place is where it all begins.

Ms. Malissia

21,675 次观看 • 5 个月前

It’s amazing some men just don’t get they are part of the problem!! Instead of admitting your misogyny and being accountable for making women feel unsafe you rather double down and get worse. Not maybe looking at what causes women to feel this way, self reflection. You rather double down and blame women for your terrible behavior. What’s the #1 thing men are scared of when they go to jail? Sexual abuse, so if you as a man are scare of other men how the fuck do you think we feel?! And I swear any asshole that comments it’s not all men, YOU ARE THE FUCKING PROBLEM!! Any man who say that is probably the exact guy we are talking about! Look at all the laws that are being formed against women BY MEN!! Even sexual assault is being soften. The young women growing up now don’t stand a chance!! And it’s so annoying cause it’s just another excuse for men not to take accountability for their bullshit!! Instead of looking at themselves and asking what part of the problem they are. Do they need to change some things about themselves. No it’s easier for men to just keep lashing out at women. Not taking a second to think “what have I done to make women feel unsafe. You just get defensive and make it WORSE!! With no regard on changing your behavior. You have taken women’s rights and continue to push us into a corner of your control. How long do you think we will let this happen?! And for the women who fight against yourself, well, have the life you deserve. You are very stupid to think this won’t involve you too. #taketheplankoutofyourowneyefirst

It’s amazing some men just don’t get they are part of the problem!! Instead of admitting your misogyny and being accountable for making women feel unsafe you rather double down and get worse. Not maybe looking at what causes women to feel this way, self reflection. You rather double down and blame women for your terrible behavior. What’s the #1 thing men are scared of when they go to jail? Sexual abuse, so if you as a man are scare of other men how the fuck do you think we feel?! And I swear any asshole that comments it’s not all men, YOU ARE THE FUCKING PROBLEM!! Any man who say that is probably the exact guy we are talking about! Look at all the laws that are being formed against women BY MEN!! Even sexual assault is being soften. The young women growing up now don’t stand a chance!! And it’s so annoying cause it’s just another excuse for men not to take accountability for their bullshit!! Instead of looking at themselves and asking what part of the problem they are. Do they need to change some things about themselves. No it’s easier for men to just keep lashing out at women. Not taking a second to think “what have I done to make women feel unsafe. You just get defensive and make it WORSE!! With no regard on changing your behavior. You have taken women’s rights and continue to push us into a corner of your control. How long do you think we will let this happen?! And for the women who fight against yourself, well, have the life you deserve. You are very stupid to think this won’t involve you too. #taketheplankoutofyourowneyefirst

Leslie Jones 🦋

221,447 次观看 • 2 年前

This touched my soul. A grown man brought to tears “Listen, I'm not one to cry on social media, but I am grieved right now. I'm angry and I'm heartbroken. If you look at these comments, Charlie Kirk just passed away. God rest his soul This man was just trying to stand for truth in a dark and twisted society. He was just trying to have conversations with people, and he just got murdered. You look at the comment section, and people are mocking him and saying, serves him right. This should grieve you. You should be instantly brought to prayer. You cannot watch videos like this. This is demonic, seeing that woman get stabbed in the neck, and we can just scroll to the next video. This should be breaking us down to our knees and praying out to the Father, and saying, Lord, help us. Lord, heal our land. Please return from our wicked ways. The sin in our hearts first. Lord, purge the sin in my heart. We have all this darkness and wickedness within us as humans. We live in a Genesis 3 fallen world. I'm telling you guys that we just need to do something. We need to just repent. And turn to God. I just reading these comments about Charlie just passed away and the comments are like serves him right like how could you do that? How could you speak about another human being like that? How could you think about his family and his children? He's a human being. How could you murder someone for sharing their opinions either if you believe in them or not? I didn't agree with everything the man said. I just like this stuff about Jesus. Lord, help us, Lord. You shouldn't be looking at this stuff and not be affected. It should grieve you. If it's not, you really need to think for a second, allow it to affect you, allow it to sit in your heart for a second and recognize that this is evil. It should burn a righteous anger within you, a holy indignation against the devil and against Satan. This is wicked, you guys” I strongly recommended watching this with volume so you can hear the emotion in his voice

This touched my soul. A grown man brought to tears “Listen, I'm not one to cry on social media, but I am grieved right now. I'm angry and I'm heartbroken. If you look at these comments, Charlie Kirk just passed away. God rest his soul This man was just trying to stand for truth in a dark and twisted society. He was just trying to have conversations with people, and he just got murdered. You look at the comment section, and people are mocking him and saying, serves him right. This should grieve you. You should be instantly brought to prayer. You cannot watch videos like this. This is demonic, seeing that woman get stabbed in the neck, and we can just scroll to the next video. This should be breaking us down to our knees and praying out to the Father, and saying, Lord, help us. Lord, heal our land. Please return from our wicked ways. The sin in our hearts first. Lord, purge the sin in my heart. We have all this darkness and wickedness within us as humans. We live in a Genesis 3 fallen world. I'm telling you guys that we just need to do something. We need to just repent. And turn to God. I just reading these comments about Charlie just passed away and the comments are like serves him right like how could you do that? How could you speak about another human being like that? How could you think about his family and his children? He's a human being. How could you murder someone for sharing their opinions either if you believe in them or not? I didn't agree with everything the man said. I just like this stuff about Jesus. Lord, help us, Lord. You shouldn't be looking at this stuff and not be affected. It should grieve you. If it's not, you really need to think for a second, allow it to affect you, allow it to sit in your heart for a second and recognize that this is evil. It should burn a righteous anger within you, a holy indignation against the devil and against Satan. This is wicked, you guys” I strongly recommended watching this with volume so you can hear the emotion in his voice

Wall Street Apes

64,254 次观看 • 1 年前

This moment right here is what it's all about and where it all began. #PresidentTrump showed the entire world how completely useless the career politicians/the deep state/ the establishment/the swamp really are. A man with zero political experience took them all on from every side #Republicans ,#Democrats,the media and emerged victorious despite them rigging the election he could not be stopped and ended up creating the greatest economy in history. Such a historically monumental embarrassment on the world stage for all to see could not go unpunished and that has been the reason for the countless fabricated witch hunts we have seen since then. This moment eats away at them like a festering wound they can't stop scratching no matter how hard they try. We jokingly call it #TrumpDerangementSyndrome but it's very real and there is no cure. The last thing the deep state can allow is for another Trump term because they know that would give #WeThePeople the power over our government again and to them that is preposterous. In their eyes the government should have control of every aspect of our lives. Once again it falls on #MAGA to save the country from the deep state and their globalist agenda. If you thought this moment was great just wait for what's still yet to come baby! #TRUMP2024ToSaveAmerica

This moment right here is what it's all about and where it all began. #PresidentTrump showed the entire world how completely useless the career politicians/the deep state/ the establishment/the swamp really are. A man with zero political experience took them all on from every side #Republicans ,#Democrats,the media and emerged victorious despite them rigging the election he could not be stopped and ended up creating the greatest economy in history. Such a historically monumental embarrassment on the world stage for all to see could not go unpunished and that has been the reason for the countless fabricated witch hunts we have seen since then. This moment eats away at them like a festering wound they can't stop scratching no matter how hard they try. We jokingly call it #TrumpDerangementSyndrome but it's very real and there is no cure. The last thing the deep state can allow is for another Trump term because they know that would give #WeThePeople the power over our government again and to them that is preposterous. In their eyes the government should have control of every aspect of our lives. Once again it falls on #MAGA to save the country from the deep state and their globalist agenda. If you thought this moment was great just wait for what's still yet to come baby! #TRUMP2024ToSaveAmerica

Rapidsloth

31,883 次观看 • 3 年前

Sean Davis Reveals The Real Reason Why John Thune is Protecting RINOs Who Are Blocking the SAVE America Act: "To Mitch McConnell, the Senate is his means of protecting his own power. He goes out and raises a ton of money. He's able to go and browbeat corporations into donating to his PAC. That's how he gets power in the Senate. And if he has to spend his time in the US Senate, if he has to spend two months exhausting a Democrat filibuster in order to pass something that the American people want, that is not worth it to him, because it takes two months away from delivering for his actual constituents, which are corporate lobbyists on K Street." "It's fascinating to see the difference between Thune and McConnell. McConnell is very, very smart, utterly vicious, very good at what he does, but he's kind of been out of it with all his health issues, so he installed his boy, John Thune, who looks great on camera, but isn't all that bright. He just doesn't have the the viciousness and the smarts that he needs to do this job." "Had Mitch McConnell been leader, you know, truly on the floor every day, he would have nuked the SAVE AMERICA Act from orbit, like months ago, and never would have allowed it to get this kind of momentum. But John Thune just isn't very good at it. So he's just been floundering for like months, like a fish who's been thrown out of the bowl and is like gasping for water, and so now he's like trying to put the toothpaste back in the tube, but he just can't do it. it's depressing watching how little our leaders actually care about what voters want. But in another sense, it's kind of just amusing to watch how bad he is at the job."

Sean Davis Reveals The Real Reason Why John Thune is Protecting RINOs Who Are Blocking the SAVE America Act: "To Mitch McConnell, the Senate is his means of protecting his own power. He goes out and raises a ton of money. He's able to go and browbeat corporations into donating to his PAC. That's how he gets power in the Senate. And if he has to spend his time in the US Senate, if he has to spend two months exhausting a Democrat filibuster in order to pass something that the American people want, that is not worth it to him, because it takes two months away from delivering for his actual constituents, which are corporate lobbyists on K Street." "It's fascinating to see the difference between Thune and McConnell. McConnell is very, very smart, utterly vicious, very good at what he does, but he's kind of been out of it with all his health issues, so he installed his boy, John Thune, who looks great on camera, but isn't all that bright. He just doesn't have the the viciousness and the smarts that he needs to do this job." "Had Mitch McConnell been leader, you know, truly on the floor every day, he would have nuked the SAVE AMERICA Act from orbit, like months ago, and never would have allowed it to get this kind of momentum. But John Thune just isn't very good at it. So he's just been floundering for like months, like a fish who's been thrown out of the bowl and is like gasping for water, and so now he's like trying to put the toothpaste back in the tube, but he just can't do it. it's depressing watching how little our leaders actually care about what voters want. But in another sense, it's kind of just amusing to watch how bad he is at the job."

Benny Johnson

130,532 次观看 • 7 个月前

Federally Ban Sharia Law in all 50 states. Do it today “When my mom threatened to kill me, it wasn't because I'd left Islam. It was because I took off my hijab. I was still identifying as a Muslim in those days. I just didn't wanna wear this anymore. It'd been put on me at 9 years old, I hated it since it was put on me, and I'm an adult now and I wanna take it off” “And for that reason, I am not her daughter anymore, shouldn't go to her funeral, I'm just a whore. She was gonna have me killed because she needed to make sure that I was killed before I moved onto the next step, which she saw was going to be leaving Islam. And at the point, at that time in my life, I was like, "What? What do you mean? Of course I'm not gonna leave Islam." But she's like, "I need to make sure you're killed before you leave Islam because then I'm gonna have an infidel daughter and I'm the one who's gonna be punished in eternity for that, so I need to make sure that you're killed before that happens." “Make no mistake, whether it's hijab or niqab, both of them are misogynist. Both of them are, to a degree, obviously there's a very big difference between wearing hijab and wearing niqab, but both of them stem from that same place of victim blaming. You need to cover yourself lest these men around you get aroused and end up raping you and it's because you were showing skin. And so you'll see even little girls being put in hijab. Like, toddlers. They got a diaper and a hijab on, so I guess the men are telling on themselves, saying, "Oh, we need this little girl to cover herself up." That's where it stems from. So the misogyny of it, the victim blaming, the supporting of rape culture essentially with, around hijab is evil. It's absolutely evil.”

Federally Ban Sharia Law in all 50 states. Do it today “When my mom threatened to kill me, it wasn't because I'd left Islam. It was because I took off my hijab. I was still identifying as a Muslim in those days. I just didn't wanna wear this anymore. It'd been put on me at 9 years old, I hated it since it was put on me, and I'm an adult now and I wanna take it off” “And for that reason, I am not her daughter anymore, shouldn't go to her funeral, I'm just a whore. She was gonna have me killed because she needed to make sure that I was killed before I moved onto the next step, which she saw was going to be leaving Islam. And at the point, at that time in my life, I was like, "What? What do you mean? Of course I'm not gonna leave Islam." But she's like, "I need to make sure you're killed before you leave Islam because then I'm gonna have an infidel daughter and I'm the one who's gonna be punished in eternity for that, so I need to make sure that you're killed before that happens." “Make no mistake, whether it's hijab or niqab, both of them are misogynist. Both of them are, to a degree, obviously there's a very big difference between wearing hijab and wearing niqab, but both of them stem from that same place of victim blaming. You need to cover yourself lest these men around you get aroused and end up raping you and it's because you were showing skin. And so you'll see even little girls being put in hijab. Like, toddlers. They got a diaper and a hijab on, so I guess the men are telling on themselves, saying, "Oh, we need this little girl to cover herself up." That's where it stems from. So the misogyny of it, the victim blaming, the supporting of rape culture essentially with, around hijab is evil. It's absolutely evil.”

Wall Street Apes

700,492 次观看 • 11 个月前

Jolyon Palmer answers the question 'Why didn't Leclerc get a penalty for not giving the position back to Lewis?' "It's a good question and I don't have the answer. So let's have a look with this reverse angle because I think it becomes more clear cut here that Hamilton should have that place, second position, because of the way here that Charles gives Hamilton the space, Verstappen is then going to have a squeeze. At the moment, Max is looking like he's going to have a clear launch down the outside. Remember, he's on a medium tyre, so it's a particularly decent start. But in the end, we get four wide. You've got the two Ferraris neck and neck. You've got Verstappen so ambitious out wide onto the kerb. It's the first race he's not led out of the out of the first corner since 2019 here. He's got astonishing form and as a result, a lot of confidence to go and attack this first corner. You can actually see Hamilton is marginally ahead of Charles Leclerc before the braking zone. So it's just a nose in front. But I would say the Ferrari on the left is ahead of the Ferrari on the right." "We come through the corner. So if we ignore Verstappen now, he's never going to make it stop from that outside line. We come through the corner and now Charles is in a real squeeze here. We've had contact in the past before with Perez, Leclerc and Verstappen. This time it's Hamilton, Leclerc and Verstappen. And they managed to get through. Max doesn't turn in. He can't turn in." "So now Lewis has definitely got the second place. He's ahead of Charles, who is coming through. He's got space to stay on the track should he wish to stay on the track. But he's also chosen to go wide at this point, realises that you can just cut through. He's done it before at the first corner and gets away with it. Behind, you've got Antonelli going to do the same thing from side by side with Russell. Piastri actually is going to go deep as well, but try his best to stay on the track, whereas others won't. And Leclerc, from behind Hamilton, chooses to go off the road." "He's not forced off by Lewis. You can see the space that Lewis leaves on the exit, goes straight across. The safest thing to do at this point is to absolutely floor it, rejoin in the lead and choose who you're going to let pass. Basically, be your own judge at this point." "And as we play it through, Charles lets Lando go through, but does not let Lewis go through. It should be a penalty. It should be a slam dunk." "I can only assume the stewards saw five cars go through. Absolute melee. You've even got Franco Colapinto at the back of the field having a spin. You've got contact. You've got debris on the circuit. Marshall's needed to retrieve it, which was another sketchy condition that we had early on in the race. And I can only assume the stewards just thought Ferrari side by side, they emerged second and third." "But the reality is here, Charles Leclerc overtook Lewis Hamilton off the track and he should have had a penalty for it." - F1 2025 Mexico -

Jolyon Palmer answers the question 'Why didn't Leclerc get a penalty for not giving the position back to Lewis?' "It's a good question and I don't have the answer. So let's have a look with this reverse angle because I think it becomes more clear cut here that Hamilton should have that place, second position, because of the way here that Charles gives Hamilton the space, Verstappen is then going to have a squeeze. At the moment, Max is looking like he's going to have a clear launch down the outside. Remember, he's on a medium tyre, so it's a particularly decent start. But in the end, we get four wide. You've got the two Ferraris neck and neck. You've got Verstappen so ambitious out wide onto the kerb. It's the first race he's not led out of the out of the first corner since 2019 here. He's got astonishing form and as a result, a lot of confidence to go and attack this first corner. You can actually see Hamilton is marginally ahead of Charles Leclerc before the braking zone. So it's just a nose in front. But I would say the Ferrari on the left is ahead of the Ferrari on the right." "We come through the corner. So if we ignore Verstappen now, he's never going to make it stop from that outside line. We come through the corner and now Charles is in a real squeeze here. We've had contact in the past before with Perez, Leclerc and Verstappen. This time it's Hamilton, Leclerc and Verstappen. And they managed to get through. Max doesn't turn in. He can't turn in." "So now Lewis has definitely got the second place. He's ahead of Charles, who is coming through. He's got space to stay on the track should he wish to stay on the track. But he's also chosen to go wide at this point, realises that you can just cut through. He's done it before at the first corner and gets away with it. Behind, you've got Antonelli going to do the same thing from side by side with Russell. Piastri actually is going to go deep as well, but try his best to stay on the track, whereas others won't. And Leclerc, from behind Hamilton, chooses to go off the road." "He's not forced off by Lewis. You can see the space that Lewis leaves on the exit, goes straight across. The safest thing to do at this point is to absolutely floor it, rejoin in the lead and choose who you're going to let pass. Basically, be your own judge at this point." "And as we play it through, Charles lets Lando go through, but does not let Lewis go through. It should be a penalty. It should be a slam dunk." "I can only assume the stewards saw five cars go through. Absolute melee. You've even got Franco Colapinto at the back of the field having a spin. You've got contact. You've got debris on the circuit. Marshall's needed to retrieve it, which was another sketchy condition that we had early on in the race. And I can only assume the stewards just thought Ferrari side by side, they emerged second and third." "But the reality is here, Charles Leclerc overtook Lewis Hamilton off the track and he should have had a penalty for it." - F1 2025 Mexico -

sim 🇧🇷🇲🇽🇸🇳🇫🇷🇭🇹

273,432 次观看 • 11 个月前

Someone stood on a piece of land, looked at a living, breathing dog who had done nothing but exist, and said: "Just shoot him dead." Not "get rid of him." Not "take him to a shelter." Not even "I don't want him anymore." Shoot him dead. I want you to sit with that sentence for a second before you keep scrolling, because everything that comes after it only makes sense once you understand how casually those five words get said in this world. Somewhere, right now, someone is saying a version of that sentence about a living thing that trusted them, or wanted to, or was still learning how. Most of the time nobody films it. Most of the time there's no ending. There's just a decision, made in under a second, by someone who will forget they ever made it. This time, someone didn't listen. This is the part where I'm supposed to tell you what happens next. I'm not going to. Not because I'm holding it hostage for engagement — okay, maybe a little — but mostly because the story doesn't work if I hand it to you pre-chewed. You need to watch a dog decide, in real time, whether the human species is worth the risk. You need to watch that calculation happen behind a pair of eyes that have every reason to say no. That's not something I can describe to you in a tweet. That's something you have to sit through. But I can tell you what it's about. It's about the gap. The invisible, unmeasurable gap between a dog who has been failed by people and a dog who has decided to try again anyway. Nobody talks about that gap. We talk about rescues like they're a single moment — the dramatic snatch, the shelter cage, the "and then everything was fine" — but that's not how trust works, and it's definitely not how fear works. Fear doesn't leave because you fed it once. Fear moves out slowly, one inch at a time, and it takes its shoes off at the door so you don't hear it coming back. PART ONE: THE VERDICT Here's what almost nobody says out loud: dogs get sentenced constantly, by people who will never be held accountable for the sentence. Too old. Too much energy. Too expensive. Doesn't match the new couch. Growled once at a toddler who was pulling its ears. In goes the verdict, out goes the dog — sometimes to a shelter, sometimes to a shed, sometimes to the side of a highway at 60 miles an hour with the door still swinging shut. And sometimes, if the owner is lazy enough and cruel enough at the same time, the sentence is the one you already read. Just shoot him dead. Nobody ever asks the dog's side. Obviously. He can't testify. He can't explain that he was scared of the vacuum, or that he barked at 2am because something moved in the yard, or that he never asked to be born into a house that saw him as a liability the second he became inconvenient. All he can do is react to what happens to him. And what happened to this one was a verdict that most animals never survive to tell. Except — spoiler-adjacent, not a spoiler — he did survive. That's the only thing I'll give you for free. He survived the verdict. What he did with the rest of the sentence, what it cost him to survive it, what he had to unlearn about people before he could stand near one without flinching — that's the part you're going to want your full attention for. PART TWO: THE DISTANCE THAT NOBODY MEASURES There's a very specific kind of animal behavior that people who haven't lived it will never fully understand: the dog who wants to come closer and physically cannot make his legs do it. You've maybe seen a version of it — the shelter dog pressed against the back wall of the kennel, the street dog who follows you for six blocks but won't take food from your hand, the "feral" label slapped onto an animal who is, underneath the label, simply doing math. Every approach is a risk assessment. Every human hand is a variable that could be gentle or could be the last thing he ever feels. You don't get to skip that math just because your intentions are good. The dog doesn't know your intentions. He only knows what hands have done before. So he keeps his distance. Not because he's unfriendly — dogs who've been failed are very often the most desperate to be loved, which is its own kind of tragic irony — but because distance is the only insurance policy he has left. He'll circle. He'll watch. He'll get close enough to almost, almost, and then something — a sound, a movement, a memory with no name attached to it — will send him back to the treeline, and you'll be left standing there wondering what you did wrong, when the honest answer is: nothing. It's not about you. It's about every hand that came before yours. This is the part of the story where most people give up. Not because they don't care, but because patience like that isn't natural. It goes against every instinct you have, watching a scared animal and wanting to just fix it today, right now, with one good meal and a soft voice. It doesn't work that way. It was never going to work that way. And the fact that someone didn't give up on this particular dog — that they let the timeline be the dog's timeline instead of their own — is the actual plot of the video you're about to watch. Not the reunion. The waiting. PART THREE: WHAT NOBODY TELLS YOU ABOUT REBUILDING TRUST You can't apologize your way into an animal's trust. You can't explain to a dog that you're not like the last person, that this time is different, that you promise. Words mean nothing to an animal whose entire understanding of humans has been written in actions. The only currency that works is repetition — showing up the same way, at the same pace, without asking for anything back, for so long that the dog's nervous system slowly, grudgingly, starts to recalibrate what a human standing nearby actually means. That recalibration has a cost, and the cost is time you don't get to see the value of until it's already paid. Every single day where nothing visibly changes is still doing something. The dog is watching. Filing data. Building, molecule by molecule, a case for why this particular human might be the exception. You don't get updates on that internal process. You just keep showing up and hope the math eventually tips in your favor. And when it does tip — when there's a first moment of contact, a first inch of distance closed that will never open back up the same way again — it doesn't look like a movie. It's not slow motion. It's not a soundtrack swelling. It's small, and quiet, and if you weren't paying close attention you'd almost miss it. Which is exactly why you need to actually watch this one instead of scrolling past assuming you already know how it goes. You don't. Nobody's story of rebuilding trust looks the same, and this one has a shape you haven't seen before. PART FOUR: THE CASUAL CRUELTY OF "JUST GET RID OF IT" Let's go back to that sentence, because I don't think we're done with it. Just shoot him dead. Think about what has to happen in a person's head for those words to come out that easily. It's not usually rage. Rage burns hot and fast and then it's gone. This is colder than that. This is the language of someone who has stopped seeing a living creature as a living creature and started seeing him as an inconvenience with a heartbeat — a problem to be solved, a line item to be closed, and closing it in the most permanent, least effortful way available. That mindset doesn't come from nowhere. It comes from a culture that has quietly taught a lot of people that animals are disposable the second they stop being convenient. That a dog is a product with a return policy. That love, if it was ever there at all, expires the moment it becomes inconvenient. You see it in the volume of animals abandoned every single year for reasons that amount to "we changed our minds." You see it in how easily people say "I'll just get another one" like a dog is a phone case. You see it in a sentence like the one that started this whole post — a sentence casual enough that the person saying it probably forgot they said it by the following week. But here's the thing about casual cruelty: it only wins if nobody's watching, and if nobody's willing to do the inconvenient thing instead. The inconvenient thing here wasn't dramatic. It wasn't a rescue montage. It was choosing, day after day, not to be the kind of person who says that sentence. It was choosing patience over convenience, presence over ultimatums, and a scared dog's timeline over anyone else's schedule. That's not a headline. That's just what actually saving something looks like, most of the time — unglamorous, slow, and completely invisible until suddenly it isn't. PART FIVE: THE QUESTION UNDERNEATH THE VIDEO Here's what I actually want you to sit with while you watch this, more than the dog, more than the backstory, more than the sentence that kicked the whole thing off: what would you have done? Not in theory. Not as the version of yourself that definitely would have been patient and kind and consistent for however many months or years it took. I mean actually — if a scared, unwanted animal showed up on your property and kept its distance for weeks, would you have kept showing up? If it took longer than you expected, would your patience have held? If someone told you it wasn't worth the effort, would you have believed them? Most people like to believe they'd be the exception. Most people, if we're honest, would've given up around week three. That's not a judgment — patience like that is genuinely hard, and most of us are stretched thin enough in our own lives without taking on a slow-motion trust rebuild with an animal who might never fully come around. But some people don't give up. Some people treat a scared, unwanted dog like he's worth more time than the person who wanted him dead ever gave him. And when you watch someone do that — really watch it, not skim past it — it recalibrates something in you too. It's hard to explain why watching a stranger be patient with a dog on the internet can hit as hard as it does. But it does. It always does. There's something in us that recognizes the shape of a second chance being handed to someone — something — who was told they didn't deserve one. PART SIX: WHY THIS ISN'T JUST A DOG VIDEO I know how this sounds. "It's just a dog video." I've said that about other videos too, right before they wrecked me completely. But there's a reason stories like this one land differently than the average "look how cute" clip. It's because underneath the surface, this isn't really about a dog. It's about the exact same question that shows up everywhere in human life, just translated into fur and silence and body language instead of words: what do you do with something — someone — who has been told they're not worth saving? Everyone reading this knows a version of that story that isn't about an animal. Maybe it's a person who was written off young and spent years proving the label wrong. Maybe it's a relationship everyone said wasn't worth the work. Maybe it's a version of yourself from a few years ago that a lot of people, maybe even you, had already given up on. The instinct to walk away from something difficult, something that isn't guaranteed to work out, something that might take way longer than feels reasonable — that instinct doesn't care whether the "something" has four legs or two. It shows up everywhere. And every time someone chooses to stay anyway, chooses the slow rebuild over the easy exit, it's worth paying attention to. Not because it's rare. Because it's rare enough that most of us forget it's even an option. PART SEVEN: WATCH IT PROPERLY So here's my actual ask, and it's a small one. Don't watch this with the sound off while you scroll to the next thing. Don't skip to the end because you already think you know how it goes — you don't, and skipping ahead will genuinely cost you the part that makes this different from every other rescue video you've seen this year. Watch the whole thing, start to finish, and pay attention to the parts that feel like nothing is happening. That's not filler. That's the actual story. The part where nothing seems to be happening is the part where everything is happening, quietly, underneath the surface, one cautious step at a time. By the time you get to the end, you'll understand exactly why that opening sentence exists at all — why I needed you to hear it before you saw a single frame. Because without it, this just looks like a dog being sweet. With it, you understand what that sweetness had to survive to exist. You understand what it costs an animal to trust again after someone decided his life wasn't worth the trouble of finding him a home. You understand that every soft moment in this video is standing on top of a decision that almost went the other way, made by someone who chose completely differently than the person before them. There is a version of this story that ends in a hole in the ground, unmarked, unremembered, unfilmed. Nobody would have known. That's the version that happens more often than any of us want to think about. This isn't that version. This is the other one — the rare one, the one that only exists because somebody looked at the same "inconvenient" animal that someone else wanted gone and decided that inconvenient wasn't the same thing as disposable. You're not going to get the details from me. You're going to have to watch it. But I'll tell you this much: by the end, "just shoot him dead" is going to sound less like a sentence someone said about a dog, and a lot more like a sentence that tells you everything you need to know about the person who said it — and absolutely nothing about the dog who proved them wrong. Watch until the very last second. The last few frames are the whole reason this post exists. If this hit you the way it hit me, don't just scroll past it silently. Send it to the one person in your life who still believes some things — some animals, some people — aren't worth the effort of saving. Let them sit with it the way I made you sit with that first sentence. Some verdicts deserve to be overturned in public. PART EIGHT: THE BIOLOGY OF A FLINCH There's a reason a dog like this doesn't just "get over it" the way people want him to. Fear like that isn't a personality trait. It's a nervous system that got rewired by repetition, the same way trust gets built by repetition — except rewiring fear takes a fraction of the time and undoing it takes ten times as long. One bad hand can undo a hundred good ones if it lands at the wrong moment. That's not the dog being dramatic. That's just how threat memory works in every mammal on this planet, humans included. You don't choose to flinch. Your body decides for you, based on evidence it collected before you were old enough to argue with it. So when you watch an animal hesitate at a hand that means no harm, you're not watching stubbornness. You're watching a very reasonable, very intelligent risk calculation running in real time, built entirely out of things that happened to him before anyone in this story ever showed up. The tragedy isn't that he was cautious. The tragedy is that caution was earned, fairly, by people who never had to answer for teaching it to him. What gets me every time I think about stories like this one is how much strength it actually takes to be cautious and still, eventually, choose to try again anyway. We love to talk about bravery like it only looks one way — loud, dramatic, obvious. Nobody talks about the bravery of a scared animal taking one more step toward a species that has already hurt him, on nothing but a hope that this time might be different. That's not the absence of fear. That's fear, fully present, being overridden by something even stronger. If you want to know what real courage looks like, it rarely looks like a superhero. More often it looks exactly like this — small, quiet, four-legged, and completely unaware that anyone's even watching. PART NINE: THE OTHER DOG NOBODY'S TALKING ABOUT There's a supporting character in this story who never asked to be one, and who honestly deserves more credit than he's going to get in the comments section. Every rescue story like this one has a hidden variable that nobody accounts for: the animal who was already there. The one who didn't have to share space, didn't have to share attention, didn't have to be patient with a nervous, unpredictable newcomer showing up on his territory uninvited. He could have made this so much harder. He didn't. And that quiet, uncomplicated generosity — the kind you only get from an animal who has never once calculated whether kindness is worth the risk — is doing more heavy lifting in this story than most people watching will ever notice. It's worth sitting with that for a second, too. Some of the most important characters in any redemption story aren't the ones being redeemed. They're the ones who simply didn't complicate it. Who didn't guard the door. Who treated a stranger's fear as something to be curious about instead of something to be threatened by. If there's a lesson buried in a dog who never asked for one, it might be that one. PART TEN: WHY THE INTERNET IS FULL OF FAKE VERSIONS OF THIS You've probably noticed there's an entire genre of content built around manufactured redemption arcs — staged rescues, dogs that were never actually in danger, timelines compressed into a single afternoon to make the "transformation" hit harder on camera. I'm not going to pretend that genre doesn't exist, because you've almost certainly seen it and been burned by it before, which is exactly why so many people scroll past real stories with the same skepticism they've built up for the fake ones. That skepticism is earned. It's also, in this case, going to work against you if you let it make you scroll past this one too. The difference between the manufactured version and the real one is almost always pacing. The fake version wants to get to the payoff as fast as possible because the payoff is the whole point of making it. The real version drags in places, hesitates in places, spends way too long on moments that don't look like anything is happening — because that's what actually rebuilding trust with a frightened animal looks like when nobody's editing it for maximum dopamine. If a story like this feels slower than you expected, that's not a flaw. That's the tell that it's real. Real trust doesn't hit its mark on a fifteen-second cut. PART ELEVEN: A NOTE FOR ANYONE WHO'S EVER FELT LIKE THE DOG IN THIS STORY I said earlier this isn't just a dog video, and I meant it, but I want to say the quiet part directly instead of leaving it as subtext. If you've ever been the "too much" one — too sensitive, too cautious, too slow to trust, too hard to love without a manual — this story is for you specifically, not just as a metaphor but as evidence. Evidence that the people who wanted to give up on you were wrong about what you were worth, the same way the person in this story was wrong. Evidence that being difficult to reach doesn't mean you're not worth reaching. Evidence that the right kind of patience doesn't get tired of you the way the wrong kind of person did. You don't owe anyone an explanation for how long it takes you to trust again after something breaks that trust. Nobody gets to put a timeline on your healing just because your timeline is inconvenient for them. The dog in this video didn't apologize for taking as long as he took, and he shouldn't have had to. Neither should you. The people worth keeping in your life are the ones who show up consistently enough, for long enough, without demanding a schedule for when you'll finally feel safe. Everyone else was never actually offering you safety in the first place. They were offering you a deadline. PART TWELVE: THE LAST THING I'LL SAY BEFORE YOU GO WATCH IT I've spent this entire post refusing to tell you what actually happens, and I'm going to keep doing that right up until the end, because the not-knowing is doing exactly what it's supposed to do — it's making you want to see it for yourself instead of taking my word for it. Good. That's the point. Some stories lose everything the second you summarize them. This is one of them. You can read a thousand words about the shape of trust being rebuilt, and none of them will land the way thirty seconds of actual footage will, because words can describe hesitation but they can't make you feel the seconds stretching while it happens. So go watch it. Watch the whole thing, not the highlight, not someone else's twelve-second repost with the context stripped out. Watch it start to finish, the way it was meant to be seen, and pay attention to how long the hard parts last compared to how short the resolution feels — because that ratio is the entire point. That imbalance, months of nothing followed by moments of everything, is what real change actually looks like, in dogs and in people both. It's never as fast as we want it to be. It's always worth it anyway. Somebody said "just shoot him dead" about a dog who turned out to be worth all of this. Go find out exactly how wrong they were. PART THIRTEEN: WHAT YOU'LL PROBABLY DO AFTER YOU WATCH IT I already know roughly how this goes, because it goes the same way every time a story like this actually lands. You'll watch it once, quickly, half-distracted, the way you watch most things in a feed built to keep you moving. And then something in the pacing, or the eyes, or the exact moment the hesitation breaks, is going to make you go back and watch it a second time, slower, actually paying attention this time. That second watch is always the one that gets people. The first watch is for your eyes. The second watch is for whatever part of you still remembers what it feels like to be given up on. Then you'll do the thing everyone does — you'll look at the comments, half expecting someone to have ruined it with a joke, and instead you'll find a wall of strangers who all had the exact same reaction you did, which is somehow both comforting and a little unsettling, because it means this feeling isn't rare. It means a lot of us are quietly carrying around the same soft spot for stories about being chosen after everyone else already walked away. We don't talk about that soft spot very often. We just recognize it instantly in each other whenever something like this shows up in the feed. And then, if the story really got you, you'll do the thing I already asked you to do earlier, except now you'll actually mean it — you'll send it to somebody. Not because you think they haven't seen a rescue video before. Because you want them to sit with that opening sentence the exact way you just did, cold, before they know how it ends. You want to watch their reaction the way someone once wanted to watch yours. That's not manipulation. That's just what people do with stories that matter to them. We pass them forward, hoping they land on someone the way they landed on us. PART FOURTEEN: THE ONE THING I WON'T LET YOU FORGET Before you go tap play, I need you to hold onto one detail, because it's the thread that ties this whole post together and it's easy to lose in a feed that moves as fast as this one does. The dog in this story is not a rare exception. He is not a lottery winner. He is one version, filmed and shared and lucky enough to have someone stubborn enough to see it through, of something that is happening constantly, everywhere, to animals who will never get a camera pointed at them and never get a caption written about them. For every one of him, there are dozens who got the other verdict. The one nobody films. The one that ends exactly where the sentence said it would. That's not meant to guilt you. It's meant to make the three minutes you're about to spend mean something more than entertainment. Every view, every share, every person who stops scrolling long enough to actually watch instead of skip, is a tiny, almost meaningless vote for the version of the story where patience wins instead of convenience. It won't save the ones who already didn't make it. But it might be the reason the next version of this story — the next scared animal on the next uncertain property, in front of the next person deciding whether he's worth the trouble — gets a different ending than the one that almost happened here. So watch it properly. Watch the pauses. Watch the eyes. Watch exactly how long it takes for something to shift, and remember that every second of that footage is standing on top of a decision someone made not to give up when giving up would have been so much easier, and so much faster, and so much more convenient. Somebody wanted him dead. Somebody else decided he was worth all of this instead. Now go watch which one turned out to be right.

Someone stood on a piece of land, looked at a living, breathing dog who had done nothing but exist, and said: "Just shoot him dead." Not "get rid of him." Not "take him to a shelter." Not even "I don't want him anymore." Shoot him dead. I want you to sit with that sentence for a second before you keep scrolling, because everything that comes after it only makes sense once you understand how casually those five words get said in this world. Somewhere, right now, someone is saying a version of that sentence about a living thing that trusted them, or wanted to, or was still learning how. Most of the time nobody films it. Most of the time there's no ending. There's just a decision, made in under a second, by someone who will forget they ever made it. This time, someone didn't listen. This is the part where I'm supposed to tell you what happens next. I'm not going to. Not because I'm holding it hostage for engagement — okay, maybe a little — but mostly because the story doesn't work if I hand it to you pre-chewed. You need to watch a dog decide, in real time, whether the human species is worth the risk. You need to watch that calculation happen behind a pair of eyes that have every reason to say no. That's not something I can describe to you in a tweet. That's something you have to sit through. But I can tell you what it's about. It's about the gap. The invisible, unmeasurable gap between a dog who has been failed by people and a dog who has decided to try again anyway. Nobody talks about that gap. We talk about rescues like they're a single moment — the dramatic snatch, the shelter cage, the "and then everything was fine" — but that's not how trust works, and it's definitely not how fear works. Fear doesn't leave because you fed it once. Fear moves out slowly, one inch at a time, and it takes its shoes off at the door so you don't hear it coming back. PART ONE: THE VERDICT Here's what almost nobody says out loud: dogs get sentenced constantly, by people who will never be held accountable for the sentence. Too old. Too much energy. Too expensive. Doesn't match the new couch. Growled once at a toddler who was pulling its ears. In goes the verdict, out goes the dog — sometimes to a shelter, sometimes to a shed, sometimes to the side of a highway at 60 miles an hour with the door still swinging shut. And sometimes, if the owner is lazy enough and cruel enough at the same time, the sentence is the one you already read. Just shoot him dead. Nobody ever asks the dog's side. Obviously. He can't testify. He can't explain that he was scared of the vacuum, or that he barked at 2am because something moved in the yard, or that he never asked to be born into a house that saw him as a liability the second he became inconvenient. All he can do is react to what happens to him. And what happened to this one was a verdict that most animals never survive to tell. Except — spoiler-adjacent, not a spoiler — he did survive. That's the only thing I'll give you for free. He survived the verdict. What he did with the rest of the sentence, what it cost him to survive it, what he had to unlearn about people before he could stand near one without flinching — that's the part you're going to want your full attention for. PART TWO: THE DISTANCE THAT NOBODY MEASURES There's a very specific kind of animal behavior that people who haven't lived it will never fully understand: the dog who wants to come closer and physically cannot make his legs do it. You've maybe seen a version of it — the shelter dog pressed against the back wall of the kennel, the street dog who follows you for six blocks but won't take food from your hand, the "feral" label slapped onto an animal who is, underneath the label, simply doing math. Every approach is a risk assessment. Every human hand is a variable that could be gentle or could be the last thing he ever feels. You don't get to skip that math just because your intentions are good. The dog doesn't know your intentions. He only knows what hands have done before. So he keeps his distance. Not because he's unfriendly — dogs who've been failed are very often the most desperate to be loved, which is its own kind of tragic irony — but because distance is the only insurance policy he has left. He'll circle. He'll watch. He'll get close enough to almost, almost, and then something — a sound, a movement, a memory with no name attached to it — will send him back to the treeline, and you'll be left standing there wondering what you did wrong, when the honest answer is: nothing. It's not about you. It's about every hand that came before yours. This is the part of the story where most people give up. Not because they don't care, but because patience like that isn't natural. It goes against every instinct you have, watching a scared animal and wanting to just fix it today, right now, with one good meal and a soft voice. It doesn't work that way. It was never going to work that way. And the fact that someone didn't give up on this particular dog — that they let the timeline be the dog's timeline instead of their own — is the actual plot of the video you're about to watch. Not the reunion. The waiting. PART THREE: WHAT NOBODY TELLS YOU ABOUT REBUILDING TRUST You can't apologize your way into an animal's trust. You can't explain to a dog that you're not like the last person, that this time is different, that you promise. Words mean nothing to an animal whose entire understanding of humans has been written in actions. The only currency that works is repetition — showing up the same way, at the same pace, without asking for anything back, for so long that the dog's nervous system slowly, grudgingly, starts to recalibrate what a human standing nearby actually means. That recalibration has a cost, and the cost is time you don't get to see the value of until it's already paid. Every single day where nothing visibly changes is still doing something. The dog is watching. Filing data. Building, molecule by molecule, a case for why this particular human might be the exception. You don't get updates on that internal process. You just keep showing up and hope the math eventually tips in your favor. And when it does tip — when there's a first moment of contact, a first inch of distance closed that will never open back up the same way again — it doesn't look like a movie. It's not slow motion. It's not a soundtrack swelling. It's small, and quiet, and if you weren't paying close attention you'd almost miss it. Which is exactly why you need to actually watch this one instead of scrolling past assuming you already know how it goes. You don't. Nobody's story of rebuilding trust looks the same, and this one has a shape you haven't seen before. PART FOUR: THE CASUAL CRUELTY OF "JUST GET RID OF IT" Let's go back to that sentence, because I don't think we're done with it. Just shoot him dead. Think about what has to happen in a person's head for those words to come out that easily. It's not usually rage. Rage burns hot and fast and then it's gone. This is colder than that. This is the language of someone who has stopped seeing a living creature as a living creature and started seeing him as an inconvenience with a heartbeat — a problem to be solved, a line item to be closed, and closing it in the most permanent, least effortful way available. That mindset doesn't come from nowhere. It comes from a culture that has quietly taught a lot of people that animals are disposable the second they stop being convenient. That a dog is a product with a return policy. That love, if it was ever there at all, expires the moment it becomes inconvenient. You see it in the volume of animals abandoned every single year for reasons that amount to "we changed our minds." You see it in how easily people say "I'll just get another one" like a dog is a phone case. You see it in a sentence like the one that started this whole post — a sentence casual enough that the person saying it probably forgot they said it by the following week. But here's the thing about casual cruelty: it only wins if nobody's watching, and if nobody's willing to do the inconvenient thing instead. The inconvenient thing here wasn't dramatic. It wasn't a rescue montage. It was choosing, day after day, not to be the kind of person who says that sentence. It was choosing patience over convenience, presence over ultimatums, and a scared dog's timeline over anyone else's schedule. That's not a headline. That's just what actually saving something looks like, most of the time — unglamorous, slow, and completely invisible until suddenly it isn't. PART FIVE: THE QUESTION UNDERNEATH THE VIDEO Here's what I actually want you to sit with while you watch this, more than the dog, more than the backstory, more than the sentence that kicked the whole thing off: what would you have done? Not in theory. Not as the version of yourself that definitely would have been patient and kind and consistent for however many months or years it took. I mean actually — if a scared, unwanted animal showed up on your property and kept its distance for weeks, would you have kept showing up? If it took longer than you expected, would your patience have held? If someone told you it wasn't worth the effort, would you have believed them? Most people like to believe they'd be the exception. Most people, if we're honest, would've given up around week three. That's not a judgment — patience like that is genuinely hard, and most of us are stretched thin enough in our own lives without taking on a slow-motion trust rebuild with an animal who might never fully come around. But some people don't give up. Some people treat a scared, unwanted dog like he's worth more time than the person who wanted him dead ever gave him. And when you watch someone do that — really watch it, not skim past it — it recalibrates something in you too. It's hard to explain why watching a stranger be patient with a dog on the internet can hit as hard as it does. But it does. It always does. There's something in us that recognizes the shape of a second chance being handed to someone — something — who was told they didn't deserve one. PART SIX: WHY THIS ISN'T JUST A DOG VIDEO I know how this sounds. "It's just a dog video." I've said that about other videos too, right before they wrecked me completely. But there's a reason stories like this one land differently than the average "look how cute" clip. It's because underneath the surface, this isn't really about a dog. It's about the exact same question that shows up everywhere in human life, just translated into fur and silence and body language instead of words: what do you do with something — someone — who has been told they're not worth saving? Everyone reading this knows a version of that story that isn't about an animal. Maybe it's a person who was written off young and spent years proving the label wrong. Maybe it's a relationship everyone said wasn't worth the work. Maybe it's a version of yourself from a few years ago that a lot of people, maybe even you, had already given up on. The instinct to walk away from something difficult, something that isn't guaranteed to work out, something that might take way longer than feels reasonable — that instinct doesn't care whether the "something" has four legs or two. It shows up everywhere. And every time someone chooses to stay anyway, chooses the slow rebuild over the easy exit, it's worth paying attention to. Not because it's rare. Because it's rare enough that most of us forget it's even an option. PART SEVEN: WATCH IT PROPERLY So here's my actual ask, and it's a small one. Don't watch this with the sound off while you scroll to the next thing. Don't skip to the end because you already think you know how it goes — you don't, and skipping ahead will genuinely cost you the part that makes this different from every other rescue video you've seen this year. Watch the whole thing, start to finish, and pay attention to the parts that feel like nothing is happening. That's not filler. That's the actual story. The part where nothing seems to be happening is the part where everything is happening, quietly, underneath the surface, one cautious step at a time. By the time you get to the end, you'll understand exactly why that opening sentence exists at all — why I needed you to hear it before you saw a single frame. Because without it, this just looks like a dog being sweet. With it, you understand what that sweetness had to survive to exist. You understand what it costs an animal to trust again after someone decided his life wasn't worth the trouble of finding him a home. You understand that every soft moment in this video is standing on top of a decision that almost went the other way, made by someone who chose completely differently than the person before them. There is a version of this story that ends in a hole in the ground, unmarked, unremembered, unfilmed. Nobody would have known. That's the version that happens more often than any of us want to think about. This isn't that version. This is the other one — the rare one, the one that only exists because somebody looked at the same "inconvenient" animal that someone else wanted gone and decided that inconvenient wasn't the same thing as disposable. You're not going to get the details from me. You're going to have to watch it. But I'll tell you this much: by the end, "just shoot him dead" is going to sound less like a sentence someone said about a dog, and a lot more like a sentence that tells you everything you need to know about the person who said it — and absolutely nothing about the dog who proved them wrong. Watch until the very last second. The last few frames are the whole reason this post exists. If this hit you the way it hit me, don't just scroll past it silently. Send it to the one person in your life who still believes some things — some animals, some people — aren't worth the effort of saving. Let them sit with it the way I made you sit with that first sentence. Some verdicts deserve to be overturned in public. PART EIGHT: THE BIOLOGY OF A FLINCH There's a reason a dog like this doesn't just "get over it" the way people want him to. Fear like that isn't a personality trait. It's a nervous system that got rewired by repetition, the same way trust gets built by repetition — except rewiring fear takes a fraction of the time and undoing it takes ten times as long. One bad hand can undo a hundred good ones if it lands at the wrong moment. That's not the dog being dramatic. That's just how threat memory works in every mammal on this planet, humans included. You don't choose to flinch. Your body decides for you, based on evidence it collected before you were old enough to argue with it. So when you watch an animal hesitate at a hand that means no harm, you're not watching stubbornness. You're watching a very reasonable, very intelligent risk calculation running in real time, built entirely out of things that happened to him before anyone in this story ever showed up. The tragedy isn't that he was cautious. The tragedy is that caution was earned, fairly, by people who never had to answer for teaching it to him. What gets me every time I think about stories like this one is how much strength it actually takes to be cautious and still, eventually, choose to try again anyway. We love to talk about bravery like it only looks one way — loud, dramatic, obvious. Nobody talks about the bravery of a scared animal taking one more step toward a species that has already hurt him, on nothing but a hope that this time might be different. That's not the absence of fear. That's fear, fully present, being overridden by something even stronger. If you want to know what real courage looks like, it rarely looks like a superhero. More often it looks exactly like this — small, quiet, four-legged, and completely unaware that anyone's even watching. PART NINE: THE OTHER DOG NOBODY'S TALKING ABOUT There's a supporting character in this story who never asked to be one, and who honestly deserves more credit than he's going to get in the comments section. Every rescue story like this one has a hidden variable that nobody accounts for: the animal who was already there. The one who didn't have to share space, didn't have to share attention, didn't have to be patient with a nervous, unpredictable newcomer showing up on his territory uninvited. He could have made this so much harder. He didn't. And that quiet, uncomplicated generosity — the kind you only get from an animal who has never once calculated whether kindness is worth the risk — is doing more heavy lifting in this story than most people watching will ever notice. It's worth sitting with that for a second, too. Some of the most important characters in any redemption story aren't the ones being redeemed. They're the ones who simply didn't complicate it. Who didn't guard the door. Who treated a stranger's fear as something to be curious about instead of something to be threatened by. If there's a lesson buried in a dog who never asked for one, it might be that one. PART TEN: WHY THE INTERNET IS FULL OF FAKE VERSIONS OF THIS You've probably noticed there's an entire genre of content built around manufactured redemption arcs — staged rescues, dogs that were never actually in danger, timelines compressed into a single afternoon to make the "transformation" hit harder on camera. I'm not going to pretend that genre doesn't exist, because you've almost certainly seen it and been burned by it before, which is exactly why so many people scroll past real stories with the same skepticism they've built up for the fake ones. That skepticism is earned. It's also, in this case, going to work against you if you let it make you scroll past this one too. The difference between the manufactured version and the real one is almost always pacing. The fake version wants to get to the payoff as fast as possible because the payoff is the whole point of making it. The real version drags in places, hesitates in places, spends way too long on moments that don't look like anything is happening — because that's what actually rebuilding trust with a frightened animal looks like when nobody's editing it for maximum dopamine. If a story like this feels slower than you expected, that's not a flaw. That's the tell that it's real. Real trust doesn't hit its mark on a fifteen-second cut. PART ELEVEN: A NOTE FOR ANYONE WHO'S EVER FELT LIKE THE DOG IN THIS STORY I said earlier this isn't just a dog video, and I meant it, but I want to say the quiet part directly instead of leaving it as subtext. If you've ever been the "too much" one — too sensitive, too cautious, too slow to trust, too hard to love without a manual — this story is for you specifically, not just as a metaphor but as evidence. Evidence that the people who wanted to give up on you were wrong about what you were worth, the same way the person in this story was wrong. Evidence that being difficult to reach doesn't mean you're not worth reaching. Evidence that the right kind of patience doesn't get tired of you the way the wrong kind of person did. You don't owe anyone an explanation for how long it takes you to trust again after something breaks that trust. Nobody gets to put a timeline on your healing just because your timeline is inconvenient for them. The dog in this video didn't apologize for taking as long as he took, and he shouldn't have had to. Neither should you. The people worth keeping in your life are the ones who show up consistently enough, for long enough, without demanding a schedule for when you'll finally feel safe. Everyone else was never actually offering you safety in the first place. They were offering you a deadline. PART TWELVE: THE LAST THING I'LL SAY BEFORE YOU GO WATCH IT I've spent this entire post refusing to tell you what actually happens, and I'm going to keep doing that right up until the end, because the not-knowing is doing exactly what it's supposed to do — it's making you want to see it for yourself instead of taking my word for it. Good. That's the point. Some stories lose everything the second you summarize them. This is one of them. You can read a thousand words about the shape of trust being rebuilt, and none of them will land the way thirty seconds of actual footage will, because words can describe hesitation but they can't make you feel the seconds stretching while it happens. So go watch it. Watch the whole thing, not the highlight, not someone else's twelve-second repost with the context stripped out. Watch it start to finish, the way it was meant to be seen, and pay attention to how long the hard parts last compared to how short the resolution feels — because that ratio is the entire point. That imbalance, months of nothing followed by moments of everything, is what real change actually looks like, in dogs and in people both. It's never as fast as we want it to be. It's always worth it anyway. Somebody said "just shoot him dead" about a dog who turned out to be worth all of this. Go find out exactly how wrong they were. PART THIRTEEN: WHAT YOU'LL PROBABLY DO AFTER YOU WATCH IT I already know roughly how this goes, because it goes the same way every time a story like this actually lands. You'll watch it once, quickly, half-distracted, the way you watch most things in a feed built to keep you moving. And then something in the pacing, or the eyes, or the exact moment the hesitation breaks, is going to make you go back and watch it a second time, slower, actually paying attention this time. That second watch is always the one that gets people. The first watch is for your eyes. The second watch is for whatever part of you still remembers what it feels like to be given up on. Then you'll do the thing everyone does — you'll look at the comments, half expecting someone to have ruined it with a joke, and instead you'll find a wall of strangers who all had the exact same reaction you did, which is somehow both comforting and a little unsettling, because it means this feeling isn't rare. It means a lot of us are quietly carrying around the same soft spot for stories about being chosen after everyone else already walked away. We don't talk about that soft spot very often. We just recognize it instantly in each other whenever something like this shows up in the feed. And then, if the story really got you, you'll do the thing I already asked you to do earlier, except now you'll actually mean it — you'll send it to somebody. Not because you think they haven't seen a rescue video before. Because you want them to sit with that opening sentence the exact way you just did, cold, before they know how it ends. You want to watch their reaction the way someone once wanted to watch yours. That's not manipulation. That's just what people do with stories that matter to them. We pass them forward, hoping they land on someone the way they landed on us. PART FOURTEEN: THE ONE THING I WON'T LET YOU FORGET Before you go tap play, I need you to hold onto one detail, because it's the thread that ties this whole post together and it's easy to lose in a feed that moves as fast as this one does. The dog in this story is not a rare exception. He is not a lottery winner. He is one version, filmed and shared and lucky enough to have someone stubborn enough to see it through, of something that is happening constantly, everywhere, to animals who will never get a camera pointed at them and never get a caption written about them. For every one of him, there are dozens who got the other verdict. The one nobody films. The one that ends exactly where the sentence said it would. That's not meant to guilt you. It's meant to make the three minutes you're about to spend mean something more than entertainment. Every view, every share, every person who stops scrolling long enough to actually watch instead of skip, is a tiny, almost meaningless vote for the version of the story where patience wins instead of convenience. It won't save the ones who already didn't make it. But it might be the reason the next version of this story — the next scared animal on the next uncertain property, in front of the next person deciding whether he's worth the trouble — gets a different ending than the one that almost happened here. So watch it properly. Watch the pauses. Watch the eyes. Watch exactly how long it takes for something to shift, and remember that every second of that footage is standing on top of a decision someone made not to give up when giving up would have been so much easier, and so much faster, and so much more convenient. Somebody wanted him dead. Somebody else decided he was worth all of this instead. Now go watch which one turned out to be right.

Earth Unveiled

105,812 次观看 • 21 天前

🚨THREE days before executing Alex Pretti, the SAME agents almost killed another U.S. citizen…🚨 While illegally detaining unaccompanied minors, using excessive force, causing multiple car accidents, and assaulting multiple U.S. citizens… all in one video. The video starts with agents checking the ID of a 16-year-old girl they had just hit with their car. She has a U.S. passport. They don’t care. They had already taken her 15-year-old brother after scanning his face. They seize her passport, and then handcuff her. At the front of the car, you can see a U.S. citizen legally observing. Not interfering, or moving. Just filming. Suddenly, agents swarm them and tackle them to the ground. Multiple men put their full body weight on the person’s back. One agent hits them in the face, and then pushes his knee into their face, while another pulls the person’s hair… All while the person lays motionless. Their nose starts bleeding into the snow. They’re struggling to talk, let alone breathe. All while they are not resisting. When the agents finally lift them up, blood is running down their face. And the agent’s rampage continues. Agents are then seen smashing a car window and try to grab the driver while the car is not in park, nearly running over another agent in the process. Multiple people are now on the ground. One man has been pepper sprayed, his glasses knocked off. A woman walks up. Without warning, an agent pepper sprays her directly in the eyes, blinding her, while they yell at her to move. She can’t see where she’s going, so the person filming has to lead her to the sidewalk. The camera turns back. The man who was pepper sprayed earlier is now standing, lethargic, disoriented, and unable to see without his glasses, and with pepper spray in his eyes. They slam him back to the ground. An agent walks over, pepper sprays him again, inches from his eyes, and casually walks away. This is believed to be the same agent who later shot Alex Pretti in the back. As three agents put their full weight on this man, other agents begin throwing tear gas, including a canister thrown right next to his head. The entire area fills with thick smoke. You can hear agents accidentally hitting a car because they can’t see. After multiple pepper sprayings, physical assault, and tear gas deployment right next to his face, the agents simply stand up and walk away. They leave him lying in the middle of the street, surrounded by smoke, without glasses, effectively blinded, after already causing crashes due to lack of visibility. Eventually, he manages to get up and run for help, begging bystanders to assist him. And these are the same agents who later illegally assaulted women for filming, then assaulted Alex Pretti for helping them, using excessive force, pepper spray, and bear spray… Before tackling Alex Pretti, beating him, removing his legal firearm… and executing him. This is what happens when agents are trained to ignore the Constitution, are protected from consequences, and told that violence is policy. If this blatant abuse is allowed to continue, it’s no longer a question of if another U.S. citizen will die… It’s only a question of when, and how many more they think they can get away with before anyone stops them.

🚨THREE days before executing Alex Pretti, the SAME agents almost killed another U.S. citizen…🚨 While illegally detaining unaccompanied minors, using excessive force, causing multiple car accidents, and assaulting multiple U.S. citizens… all in one video. The video starts with agents checking the ID of a 16-year-old girl they had just hit with their car. She has a U.S. passport. They don’t care. They had already taken her 15-year-old brother after scanning his face. They seize her passport, and then handcuff her. At the front of the car, you can see a U.S. citizen legally observing. Not interfering, or moving. Just filming. Suddenly, agents swarm them and tackle them to the ground. Multiple men put their full body weight on the person’s back. One agent hits them in the face, and then pushes his knee into their face, while another pulls the person’s hair… All while the person lays motionless. Their nose starts bleeding into the snow. They’re struggling to talk, let alone breathe. All while they are not resisting. When the agents finally lift them up, blood is running down their face. And the agent’s rampage continues. Agents are then seen smashing a car window and try to grab the driver while the car is not in park, nearly running over another agent in the process. Multiple people are now on the ground. One man has been pepper sprayed, his glasses knocked off. A woman walks up. Without warning, an agent pepper sprays her directly in the eyes, blinding her, while they yell at her to move. She can’t see where she’s going, so the person filming has to lead her to the sidewalk. The camera turns back. The man who was pepper sprayed earlier is now standing, lethargic, disoriented, and unable to see without his glasses, and with pepper spray in his eyes. They slam him back to the ground. An agent walks over, pepper sprays him again, inches from his eyes, and casually walks away. This is believed to be the same agent who later shot Alex Pretti in the back. As three agents put their full weight on this man, other agents begin throwing tear gas, including a canister thrown right next to his head. The entire area fills with thick smoke. You can hear agents accidentally hitting a car because they can’t see. After multiple pepper sprayings, physical assault, and tear gas deployment right next to his face, the agents simply stand up and walk away. They leave him lying in the middle of the street, surrounded by smoke, without glasses, effectively blinded, after already causing crashes due to lack of visibility. Eventually, he manages to get up and run for help, begging bystanders to assist him. And these are the same agents who later illegally assaulted women for filming, then assaulted Alex Pretti for helping them, using excessive force, pepper spray, and bear spray… Before tackling Alex Pretti, beating him, removing his legal firearm… and executing him. This is what happens when agents are trained to ignore the Constitution, are protected from consequences, and told that violence is policy. If this blatant abuse is allowed to continue, it’s no longer a question of if another U.S. citizen will die… It’s only a question of when, and how many more they think they can get away with before anyone stops them.

Jesus Freakin Congress

619,474 次观看 • 8 个月前

Locktober Brainwash and Cage Inspection – Mistress Uses Your Cage to Own Your Mind You kneel before me for Locktober, co¢k locked and straining, thinking this is your idea of devotion. You imagine you’re choosing this — but that’s the first fantasy I’m going to strip away. This cage isn’t just on your co¢k; it’s in your mind. Every throb against the bars is another neuron I’m rewiring to fire under my control. Chastity for Me goes far deeper than just denying you s3xual pleasure. While you ache and strain, I whisper into your mind, making you crave your own torment, making you addicted to your own humiliation. You can feel it happening: even though you know I’m manipulating you, you like it. You need it. The more I tease and torment you and make you aware of your physical constraint, the more it makes you aware of the control I’ve taken of your mind, until the only real pleasure you have left is the ache I’ve engineered for you. I tell you the truth you’re too weak to deny: before me you were nothing. My ownership is the only thing that gives you worth. The cage you’re wearing is not a symbol of “self-discipline” — it’s a symbol of your new reality, my growing control over you. It’s a physical trigger that deepens your mental servitude every time you feel it bite. To make sure you start off the first step of the most important decision of your life correctly, I order you to come forward and show off your cage so that I can inspect it. Every second of ache and desperation is just another lesson: you exist to be locked, teased, and manipulated by me, and I’m going to make sure you never forget it.

Locktober Brainwash and Cage Inspection – Mistress Uses Your Cage to Own Your Mind You kneel before me for Locktober, co¢k locked and straining, thinking this is your idea of devotion. You imagine you’re choosing this — but that’s the first fantasy I’m going to strip away. This cage isn’t just on your co¢k; it’s in your mind. Every throb against the bars is another neuron I’m rewiring to fire under my control. Chastity for Me goes far deeper than just denying you s3xual pleasure. While you ache and strain, I whisper into your mind, making you crave your own torment, making you addicted to your own humiliation. You can feel it happening: even though you know I’m manipulating you, you like it. You need it. The more I tease and torment you and make you aware of your physical constraint, the more it makes you aware of the control I’ve taken of your mind, until the only real pleasure you have left is the ache I’ve engineered for you. I tell you the truth you’re too weak to deny: before me you were nothing. My ownership is the only thing that gives you worth. The cage you’re wearing is not a symbol of “self-discipline” — it’s a symbol of your new reality, my growing control over you. It’s a physical trigger that deepens your mental servitude every time you feel it bite. To make sure you start off the first step of the most important decision of your life correctly, I order you to come forward and show off your cage so that I can inspect it. Every second of ache and desperation is just another lesson: you exist to be locked, teased, and manipulated by me, and I’m going to make sure you never forget it.

Mistress Avalon ❤︎ LADominaXoX

22,342 次观看 • 1 年前

Why Are We Bowing Down To Islam? When Muslim women like Laila Cunningham ask why Britain is bowing down to an ideology that isn't ours, it tells you the problem isn't racism. It's cowardice. Cunningham isn't attacking Muslims. She's attacking a British state that has abandoned its most basic duty. The same state that arrests parents trying to rescue their daughters from rape gangs while letting the perpetrators walk free. A Britain that punishes truth-tellers and rewards liars. We're watching institutions that were supposed to protect children, uphold the law, and defend justice without favour trading away everything that once mattered. Truth, fairness, equality before the law have all been sacrificed because officials are terrified of difficult conversations. Terrified of being called racist. Terrified of causing offence. Terrified of losing their jobs. That terror has consequences. Over 100,000 working-class White girls raped and ignored for decades because authorities didn't want to "stir up racial tensions." Eight year old Sara Sharif forced to wear a hijab that hid the very injuries that would eventually kill her. Whilst her neighbours hearing her screams were too afraid to call the police because they feared being branded racist on social media. When people do try to speak up, whistleblowers get silenced, files get destroyed, families get told to shut up for the sake of "community relations." Every cover-up, every council meeting ends with another child sacrificed to political convenience. This betrays everyone. Obviously the victims, but also every integrated Muslim expecting to live as equals under British law. They suffer most from establishment cowardice because every time the state bows down to extremists, it fuels resentment against ordinary Muslims trying to build decent lives here. When Laila Cunningham asks "Why are we bowing down?" she's trying to save the country, not divide it. She's voicing what millions think but fear to say aloud. That Britain has confused tolerance with surrender. Real leadership means applying the law equally regardless of who it offends. It means refusing to let cultural sensitivity become a shield for abuse. It means protecting children before protecting reputations and choosing justice over political careers. Britain once stood for courage, decency and fairness. Now we have officials who would rather censor uncomfortable truths than confront them. Leaders who think moral strength means staying silent while children suffer. Cunningham's question demands an answer. Why are we bowing down? Why are we betraying everything that made this country work? The truth is we're not being destroyed by racism. We're being destroyed by fear. Until the people running Britain find some courage, the betrayal continues. Not just of the victims, but of the nation itself. _________ This isn't about politics anymore. It's about preservation of a ruling clique defending its own survival, even if it means abandoning the very people they swore to protect. The nation does not need silence. It needs truth. This is not only a child abuse scandal. It is a crisis of truth, trust and governance in modern Britain. I am Raja Miah. For seven years, I led a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs. I cannot do this on my own. I need you to stand with me and help make sure the National Inquiry we have all fought for is not a whitewash. We’re running out of time. Without the numbers, they will win. It’s as simple as that. 🔴 Subscribe to my newsletter – it’s free. Or support the work for just 75p a week (£3/month or £30/year). Whatever you do, please subscribe; 👉 This is the fight. This is the moment. There will not be another 🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution? 👉 👉 No corporate sponsors. No party machine. Just you and thousands of ordinary people who know what’s at stake. We’ve come this far. Help finish it. Raja Miah MBE

Why Are We Bowing Down To Islam? When Muslim women like Laila Cunningham ask why Britain is bowing down to an ideology that isn't ours, it tells you the problem isn't racism. It's cowardice. Cunningham isn't attacking Muslims. She's attacking a British state that has abandoned its most basic duty. The same state that arrests parents trying to rescue their daughters from rape gangs while letting the perpetrators walk free. A Britain that punishes truth-tellers and rewards liars. We're watching institutions that were supposed to protect children, uphold the law, and defend justice without favour trading away everything that once mattered. Truth, fairness, equality before the law have all been sacrificed because officials are terrified of difficult conversations. Terrified of being called racist. Terrified of causing offence. Terrified of losing their jobs. That terror has consequences. Over 100,000 working-class White girls raped and ignored for decades because authorities didn't want to "stir up racial tensions." Eight year old Sara Sharif forced to wear a hijab that hid the very injuries that would eventually kill her. Whilst her neighbours hearing her screams were too afraid to call the police because they feared being branded racist on social media. When people do try to speak up, whistleblowers get silenced, files get destroyed, families get told to shut up for the sake of "community relations." Every cover-up, every council meeting ends with another child sacrificed to political convenience. This betrays everyone. Obviously the victims, but also every integrated Muslim expecting to live as equals under British law. They suffer most from establishment cowardice because every time the state bows down to extremists, it fuels resentment against ordinary Muslims trying to build decent lives here. When Laila Cunningham asks "Why are we bowing down?" she's trying to save the country, not divide it. She's voicing what millions think but fear to say aloud. That Britain has confused tolerance with surrender. Real leadership means applying the law equally regardless of who it offends. It means refusing to let cultural sensitivity become a shield for abuse. It means protecting children before protecting reputations and choosing justice over political careers. Britain once stood for courage, decency and fairness. Now we have officials who would rather censor uncomfortable truths than confront them. Leaders who think moral strength means staying silent while children suffer. Cunningham's question demands an answer. Why are we bowing down? Why are we betraying everything that made this country work? The truth is we're not being destroyed by racism. We're being destroyed by fear. Until the people running Britain find some courage, the betrayal continues. Not just of the victims, but of the nation itself. _________ This isn't about politics anymore. It's about preservation of a ruling clique defending its own survival, even if it means abandoning the very people they swore to protect. The nation does not need silence. It needs truth. This is not only a child abuse scandal. It is a crisis of truth, trust and governance in modern Britain. I am Raja Miah. For seven years, I led a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs. I cannot do this on my own. I need you to stand with me and help make sure the National Inquiry we have all fought for is not a whitewash. We’re running out of time. Without the numbers, they will win. It’s as simple as that. 🔴 Subscribe to my newsletter – it’s free. Or support the work for just 75p a week (£3/month or £30/year). Whatever you do, please subscribe; 👉 This is the fight. This is the moment. There will not be another 🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution? 👉 👉 No corporate sponsors. No party machine. Just you and thousands of ordinary people who know what’s at stake. We’ve come this far. Help finish it. Raja Miah MBE

Raja Miah

219,282 次观看 • 10 个月前