Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

The Second Amendment was not written in isolation. It sits on the same foundation as every other right. You do not get free speech if the state decides who may speak. You do not get due process if the state decides who is dangerous. You do not get bodily... autonomy if the state decides what is “reasonable.” When one amendment is treated as optional, the rest follow. History is clear. Governments do not restrain themselves. They are restrained when they hit resistance. The Constitution is a package deal. You either defend all of it, or you lose it piece by piece. Rights do not exist because the government allows them. Rights exist because the people already had them. John “TIG” Tiegen Semper Fishow more

John “TIG” Tiegen

61,234 subscribers

44,452 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Bildung

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Clarence Thomas explained the Second Amendment in one sentence. And every politician who talks about what gun rights they are willing to “let” you keep should hear it. The Second Amendment does not grant the right. It assumes the right already exists. That means the government does not give you the right to keep and bear arms. The amendment tells the government what it cannot do to a right you already had. Rights first. Government second. That is the order. And once you understand that, every gun law looks different. Because now the government is the one that has to explain itself. Not you. Then Thomas tells a story about Justice Breyer asking what he would do if a man with a machete walked up on his porch demanding money. Thomas’s answer? He would be cleaning his guns. That is why this clip hits different. He does not just rule on the Second Amendment. He understands it. He lives it. And he connects it to the history most gun control speeches leave out: The 14th Amendment. Freed slaves. The right to defend yourself from people trying to kill you. Because a citizen who cannot protect his own life does not stay a citizen for very long. Do you think most politicians understand the Second Amendment, or do they just talk around it? Shop the America Hat here:

Clarence Thomas explained the Second Amendment in one sentence. And every politician who talks about what gun rights they are willing to “let” you keep should hear it. The Second Amendment does not grant the right. It assumes the right already exists. That means the government does not give you the right to keep and bear arms. The amendment tells the government what it cannot do to a right you already had. Rights first. Government second. That is the order. And once you understand that, every gun law looks different. Because now the government is the one that has to explain itself. Not you. Then Thomas tells a story about Justice Breyer asking what he would do if a man with a machete walked up on his porch demanding money. Thomas’s answer? He would be cleaning his guns. That is why this clip hits different. He does not just rule on the Second Amendment. He understands it. He lives it. And he connects it to the history most gun control speeches leave out: The 14th Amendment. Freed slaves. The right to defend yourself from people trying to kill you. Because a citizen who cannot protect his own life does not stay a citizen for very long. Do you think most politicians understand the Second Amendment, or do they just talk around it? Shop the America Hat here:

Colion Noir

104,736 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

I am not a fan of Tucker Carlson. He is full of crap when he says the USA will not defend Taiwan if China invades, and that Israel has little to do with what is going on in the Middle East. This interview is still the best one out there, not because of Tucker, but because of the statement Gregory K Bovino makes right here. Most people will not watch it, or even listen to Greg Bovino, because they hate Tucker so much. I get it, but that is sad. You need to hear what Bovino says here, even if you will not sit through the whole interview. You simply cannot MAGA without deporting every single illegal alien in this country. These people do not share your values. They do not care about your history. Bovino is absolutely right that the 1A and 2A you hold dear will be gone if we do not deport every single one of them. If you do not agree, you are not MAGA. End of story.

I am not a fan of Tucker Carlson. He is full of crap when he says the USA will not defend Taiwan if China invades, and that Israel has little to do with what is going on in the Middle East. This interview is still the best one out there, not because of Tucker, but because of the statement Gregory K Bovino makes right here. Most people will not watch it, or even listen to Greg Bovino, because they hate Tucker so much. I get it, but that is sad. You need to hear what Bovino says here, even if you will not sit through the whole interview. You simply cannot MAGA without deporting every single illegal alien in this country. These people do not share your values. They do not care about your history. Bovino is absolutely right that the 1A and 2A you hold dear will be gone if we do not deport every single one of them. If you do not agree, you are not MAGA. End of story.

Kim "Katie" USA

51,105 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen

“This war in Congo, people have tried to make it Rwanda’s war, but it is not Rwanda’s war. Rwanda did not start this war; rather, what those who started it wanted, is what we are fighting against. And that is what I am going to explain to you. This war has its origins in the history I just mentioned. Some people who are called Rwandans found themselves on the other side of the borders that define Rwanda today. It was not Rwanda that took them there. Rwanda did not move Rwandans to Kisoro in Uganda. Rwanda did not move Rwandans to Masisi, Rutshuru, and other places. Rwanda did not take them there. Now, for those who found themselves there, if the governments of those countries want to tell them, ‘Get up and go back to where you belong, to Rwanda,’ if that is their decision, then they should expel them along with the land they live on, and remain with only what belongs to them. If you claim to act in truth or seek peace, as all people do, then you must respect people’s rights. Without a doubt, when you deny people their rights, they will fight for them, that is the fire I was talking about. And when you drag Rwandans into this situation and blame Rwanda because these other countries do not want the people who are there, what do you expect us to do? We will stand up for ourselves .” President Kagame | #KwegeraAbaturage

“This war in Congo, people have tried to make it Rwanda’s war, but it is not Rwanda’s war. Rwanda did not start this war; rather, what those who started it wanted, is what we are fighting against. And that is what I am going to explain to you. This war has its origins in the history I just mentioned. Some people who are called Rwandans found themselves on the other side of the borders that define Rwanda today. It was not Rwanda that took them there. Rwanda did not move Rwandans to Kisoro in Uganda. Rwanda did not move Rwandans to Masisi, Rutshuru, and other places. Rwanda did not take them there. Now, for those who found themselves there, if the governments of those countries want to tell them, ‘Get up and go back to where you belong, to Rwanda,’ if that is their decision, then they should expel them along with the land they live on, and remain with only what belongs to them. If you claim to act in truth or seek peace, as all people do, then you must respect people’s rights. Without a doubt, when you deny people their rights, they will fight for them, that is the fire I was talking about. And when you drag Rwandans into this situation and blame Rwanda because these other countries do not want the people who are there, what do you expect us to do? We will stand up for ourselves .” President Kagame | #KwegeraAbaturage

Presidency | Rwanda

180,462 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Rep. Chrissy Houlahan: " The Constitution is not a buffet. You don't get to pick the parts you like and ignore the rest. You don't get to swear an oath to defend it and then weaponize the government against it. The First Amendment is not optional."

Rep. Chrissy Houlahan: " The Constitution is not a buffet. You don't get to pick the parts you like and ignore the rest. You don't get to swear an oath to defend it and then weaponize the government against it. The First Amendment is not optional."

Home of the Brave

15,194 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

British diplomats are already admitting this is a stunt. Once you let in people that do not share your values, and want Israel wiped off the map, you do not get a two-state solution. You get a one-state solution: no Israel. They are not assimilating — they are taking over and The Labour Party is catering to it. It must stop NOW.

British diplomats are already admitting this is a stunt. Once you let in people that do not share your values, and want Israel wiped off the map, you do not get a two-state solution. You get a one-state solution: no Israel. They are not assimilating — they are taking over and The Labour Party is catering to it. It must stop NOW.

Congressman Randy Fine

36,728 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

The First and Second amendment do not exist in a vacuum. You do not forfeit one by exercising the other. Regardless of swift changes in the White House, DOJ or the legislature, these rights must be held as absolute. "An armed people is a people whose assembly the government MUST take seriously, a disarmed people protest at the government's pleasure." -Dudley Brown

The First and Second amendment do not exist in a vacuum. You do not forfeit one by exercising the other. Regardless of swift changes in the White House, DOJ or the legislature, these rights must be held as absolute. "An armed people is a people whose assembly the government MUST take seriously, a disarmed people protest at the government's pleasure." -Dudley Brown

National Association for Gun Rights

33,180 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

📁 Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, says the problem with AI is not if it works. It is what happens when it does. Because curing disease is not enough. The real question is: what do you do when you are no longer needed?

📁 Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, says the problem with AI is not if it works. It is what happens when it does. Because curing disease is not enough. The real question is: what do you do when you are no longer needed?

Jon Hernandez

49,677 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

There are hundreds of thousands of Jews who do not accept the state of Israel and Zionism, but they never talk about it because the mainstream media is under the control of Zionists. What is Judaism? Its not an ethnicity or culture as Zionists would have you believe. Its a religion, plain & simple. "The Jewish people have no state! They could call themselves Herzlston, or whatever they want, but they are not "Israel" and they are not the "State of the Jews"! Judaism is a religion NOT a Nationality!

There are hundreds of thousands of Jews who do not accept the state of Israel and Zionism, but they never talk about it because the mainstream media is under the control of Zionists. What is Judaism? Its not an ethnicity or culture as Zionists would have you believe. Its a religion, plain & simple. "The Jewish people have no state! They could call themselves Herzlston, or whatever they want, but they are not "Israel" and they are not the "State of the Jews"! Judaism is a religion NOT a Nationality!

Voice of Rabbis

217,253 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

If there is a video on what NOT to do when you get pulled over by the cops, this is it. The sense of entitlement is astounding.

If there is a video on what NOT to do when you get pulled over by the cops, this is it. The sense of entitlement is astounding.

Sadie

295,321 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

If the government wants to surveil American citizens, it must do so legally. The Fourth Amendment is not optional, and it cannot be bypassed for the sake of convenience. If we do not have our constitutional rights, we have nothing at all.

If the government wants to surveil American citizens, it must do so legally. The Fourth Amendment is not optional, and it cannot be bypassed for the sake of convenience. If we do not have our constitutional rights, we have nothing at all.

Rep. Keith Self

20,624 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨 FREE SPEECH UNDER THREAT IN CANADA A Western government is now openly talking about restricting access to foreign platforms because citizens are speaking in ways the authorities don’t like. When governments decide which opinions are acceptable… when they label dissent as “harm”… when they frame speech itself as a security threat… That is not protection. That is control. The moment a state claims the power to decide what its population is allowed to hear, read, or say — democracy itself is weakened. Citizens raising concerns about immigration, culture, or national identity are not criminals. They are participants in public debate. Free societies do not silence disagreement. They tolerate it — even when it is uncomfortable. Because once censorship begins, it never stays limited to one issue. The real question now is simple: Who decides what is “acceptable speech” — the people, or the government?

🚨 FREE SPEECH UNDER THREAT IN CANADA A Western government is now openly talking about restricting access to foreign platforms because citizens are speaking in ways the authorities don’t like. When governments decide which opinions are acceptable… when they label dissent as “harm”… when they frame speech itself as a security threat… That is not protection. That is control. The moment a state claims the power to decide what its population is allowed to hear, read, or say — democracy itself is weakened. Citizens raising concerns about immigration, culture, or national identity are not criminals. They are participants in public debate. Free societies do not silence disagreement. They tolerate it — even when it is uncomfortable. Because once censorship begins, it never stays limited to one issue. The real question now is simple: Who decides what is “acceptable speech” — the people, or the government?

Jim Ferguson

147,096 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

“Palestinians do not exist” is not a historical argument. It is the first stage of theft: erase the name, then erase the village, then tell the refugee: you were never here. The problem is not that they do not know history. The problem is that they need to erase it.

“Palestinians do not exist” is not a historical argument. It is the first stage of theft: erase the name, then erase the village, then tell the refugee: you were never here. The problem is not that they do not know history. The problem is that they need to erase it.

SilencedSirs◼️

30,488 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

David Frum on Jimmy Kimmel: "This is not cancel culture because it's not culture. It's state repression. It's an order from the government. Here is the script, you must read, if you do not read it, you will be taken off the air."

David Frum on Jimmy Kimmel: "This is not cancel culture because it's not culture. It's state repression. It's an order from the government. Here is the script, you must read, if you do not read it, you will be taken off the air."

Blue Georgia

1,853,642 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Ben Shapiro: “I think the Senate filibuster is actually quite important because if you do not have the Senate filibuster, what you end up with is a country that is already pendulumingside to side, doing so even farther with 51 votes in the Senate.” “Ramming through massive changes to the system of government itself... The argument President Trump has used is Democrats will do it anyway when they get the first opportunity. So we should go ahead and do it.” “I’m not sure that’s true... [What should happen] is a constitutional amendment to enshrine the filibuster in the Constitution.”

Ben Shapiro: “I think the Senate filibuster is actually quite important because if you do not have the Senate filibuster, what you end up with is a country that is already pendulumingside to side, doing so even farther with 51 votes in the Senate.” “Ramming through massive changes to the system of government itself... The argument President Trump has used is Democrats will do it anyway when they get the first opportunity. So we should go ahead and do it.” “I’m not sure that’s true... [What should happen] is a constitutional amendment to enshrine the filibuster in the Constitution.”

RedWave Press

553,369 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

“Do you MAGA people not notice that he is going against the Constitution or do you just not care?” He hasn’t gone against the Constitution, Karen.. Get over it!!

“Do you MAGA people not notice that he is going against the Constitution or do you just not care?” He hasn’t gone against the Constitution, Karen.. Get over it!!

KᗴᒪᒪᗴY ✰

170,276 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr