正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

🚨 The Sims one shotted by GPT-5.6 Pro this is without codex or any coding harness , one shot entire game with logic in 48 minutes, all in one .html file. cc : Mirochill for the test roon when we can have big model taste and personality ? like... show more

Chetaslua

27,088 subscribers

144,849 次观看 • 8 天前 •via X (Twitter)

游戏科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

GPT 5.6 Pro continues to mogs Fable in 3d test working on games one shot too , for comment check quote post and also share your prompts and fable output i will tag you with 5.6 pro results credit : Mirochill

GPT 5.6 Pro continues to mogs Fable in 3d test working on games one shot too , for comment check quote post and also share your prompts and fable output i will tag you with 5.6 pro results credit : Mirochill

Chetaslua

199,147 次观看 • 9 天前

🚨Gemini 3.0 Pro - One shotted i asked it for retro nintendo sims with games and no external assets used , it takes 1 min to output no other model have this level of consistency Prompt and Proof of one shot in Thread and this is not the best shot , there is one more cooking with slightly different prompt

🚨Gemini 3.0 Pro - One shotted i asked it for retro nintendo sims with games and no external assets used , it takes 1 min to output no other model have this level of consistency Prompt and Proof of one shot in Thread and this is not the best shot , there is one more cooking with slightly different prompt

Chetaslua

184,195 次观看 • 8 个月前

🚨GPT 5.6 Pro vs Fable 5 this is the first real competition that cover game logic , ui , 3d aspects Fable 5 mogs 5.6 pro in every aspects watch video same prompt different results , no external assets used Thanks to pozitiv4ik for the prompt and test , follow him everyone😾

🚨GPT 5.6 Pro vs Fable 5 this is the first real competition that cover game logic , ui , 3d aspects Fable 5 mogs 5.6 pro in every aspects watch video same prompt different results , no external assets used Thanks to pozitiv4ik for the prompt and test , follow him everyone😾

Chetaslua

133,948 次观看 • 4 天前

Super Mario one shotted by Gemini Pro 3.2/5 this is one the best visuals and gameplay by any model , consistency with the old design is the key Google Gemini cooked this so well

Super Mario one shotted by Gemini Pro 3.2/5 this is one the best visuals and gameplay by any model , consistency with the old design is the key Google Gemini cooked this so well

Chetaslua

15,036 次观看 • 1 个月前

One shot in codex with gpt-taste skill! GPT 5.4 medium works best :) skill:

One shot in codex with gpt-taste skill! GPT 5.4 medium works best :) skill:

Leon Lin

158,387 次观看 • 2 个月前

"Make a Minecraft clone in one single HTML file. Think hard." GPT-5 Pro

"Make a Minecraft clone in one single HTML file. Think hard." GPT-5 Pro

BLCNYY

21,784 次观看 • 10 个月前

Kind of shocking how much better GPT-5-Codex is vs the regular 'Thinking' models in ChatGPT. My subjective rankings for the fruit machine test: 1. GPT-5-Codex-Medium 2. GPT-5-Thinking-Heavy 3. GPT-5-Pro 4. GPT-5-Codex-High 5. GPT-5-Codex-Low 6. GPT-5-Thinking-Standard 7. GPT-5-Thinking-Extended 8. GPT-5-Thinking-Light OpenAI Codex team have suggested 'Medium' should be the default, but I didn't expect that it would actually beat the 'High' setting model in my test.

Kind of shocking how much better GPT-5-Codex is vs the regular 'Thinking' models in ChatGPT. My subjective rankings for the fruit machine test: 1. GPT-5-Codex-Medium 2. GPT-5-Thinking-Heavy 3. GPT-5-Pro 4. GPT-5-Codex-High 5. GPT-5-Codex-Low 6. GPT-5-Thinking-Standard 7. GPT-5-Thinking-Extended 8. GPT-5-Thinking-Light OpenAI Codex team have suggested 'Medium' should be the default, but I didn't expect that it would actually beat the 'High' setting model in my test.

Peter Gostev

101,848 次观看 • 9 个月前

Well well well, I'm one of the lucky ones with early GPT-5.6 Pro access! One-shot pages from 5.5 Pro vs 5.6 Pro. Can you tell which is which? Looks like OpenAI's finally getting somewhere with design:

Well well well, I'm one of the lucky ones with early GPT-5.6 Pro access! One-shot pages from 5.5 Pro vs 5.6 Pro. Can you tell which is which? Looks like OpenAI's finally getting somewhere with design:

Anshu

94,488 次观看 • 9 天前

GLM 5.2 is first chinese model that made 3d watch without any major mistakes 🤯 Z.ai you guys cooked very hard with this model , now only thing that we need is the big fat model , tell us the time when we can expect This is one of the hardest thing to one shot

GLM 5.2 is first chinese model that made 3d watch without any major mistakes 🤯 Z.ai you guys cooked very hard with this model , now only thing that we need is the big fat model , tell us the time when we can expect This is one of the hardest thing to one shot

Chetaslua

266,368 次观看 • 10 天前

GPT-5 thinking has been incredible at coding so far i'm not a big fan of vibe coding, but just tried a "browser OS" test in one shot - gemini 2.5 pro failed - claude 4.1 handled flow better, but not as good overall - gpt-5 nailed it, and added all the standard features DEMO 👇

GPT-5 thinking has been incredible at coding so far i'm not a big fan of vibe coding, but just tried a "browser OS" test in one shot - gemini 2.5 pro failed - claude 4.1 handled flow better, but not as good overall - gpt-5 nailed it, and added all the standard features DEMO 👇

Haider.

43,656 次观看 • 10 个月前

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

Chris

195,739 次观看 • 9 天前

HOLLLLY SHIIIIIT 😳 GPT 5.5 xhigh in codex made this paper physics website with wind effect one shot check the physics , ui and interaction Sam Altman you guys cooked and this is my first time i can suggest chatgpt is go to ai solution for everything

HOLLLLY SHIIIIIT 😳 GPT 5.5 xhigh in codex made this paper physics website with wind effect one shot check the physics , ui and interaction Sam Altman you guys cooked and this is my first time i can suggest chatgpt is go to ai solution for everything

Chetaslua

1,617,834 次观看 • 2 个月前

I am really liking the new gpt-5-codex. this is its attempt at one shotting minecraft in three.js

I am really liking the new gpt-5-codex. this is its attempt at one shotting minecraft in three.js

JB

479,500 次观看 • 9 个月前

🚨 Gemini 3.0 Pro - ONE SHOTTED I asked it for UBUNTU web os as everyone asked me for it and the result is mind blowing. prompt : Create a fully functional Linux desktop environment (Ubuntu/GNOME style) as a complete web operating system in a single HTML file with embedded CSS and JavaScript. All applications must be fully functional Use whatever libraries to get this done but make sure I can paste it all into a single HTML file and open it in Chrome.make it interesting and highly detail , shows details that no one expected go full creative and full beauty in one code block

🚨 Gemini 3.0 Pro - ONE SHOTTED I asked it for UBUNTU web os as everyone asked me for it and the result is mind blowing. prompt : Create a fully functional Linux desktop environment (Ubuntu/GNOME style) as a complete web operating system in a single HTML file with embedded CSS and JavaScript. All applications must be fully functional Use whatever libraries to get this done but make sure I can paste it all into a single HTML file and open it in Chrome.make it interesting and highly detail , shows details that no one expected go full creative and full beauty in one code block

Chetaslua

259,758 次观看 • 8 个月前

Fable one shotted the game logic. GPT Image 2 for designs. Blender MCP for models + lighting. Total dev time ~6 hours.

Fable one shotted the game logic. GPT Image 2 for designs. Blender MCP for models + lighting. Total dev time ~6 hours.

〽️att Greenberg

318,011 次观看 • 17 天前

We just updated Junie and the Codex integration in JetBrains AI! Now you can use OpenAI GPT 5.5 in all JetBrains IDEs. We ran various tests with this model but have a look yourself at one of the demo projects we built (🔊 on)

We just updated Junie and the Codex integration in JetBrains AI! Now you can use OpenAI GPT 5.5 in all JetBrains IDEs. We ran various tests with this model but have a look yourself at one of the demo projects we built (🔊 on)

JetBrains

10,966 次观看 • 2 个月前

Claude Fable 5 makes new things possible. I one shot a full horror game with it. One prompt. I have never seen AI output a game like this. This is the leap I've been waiting for. 80.3 on SWE-Bench Pro vs Opus 4.8 at 69.2, the biggest jump I have ever seen on that benchmark. It passed GPT 5.5 in both coding and intelligence on Artificial Analysis. I already canceled my $200 ChatGPT Pro plan. It fixed a Bridge Voice bug in one shot that GPT 5.5, Opus 4.7, and Opus 4.8 all failed to crack for 2 months. 10/10. Best model I have ever used. Full review below.

Claude Fable 5 makes new things possible. I one shot a full horror game with it. One prompt. I have never seen AI output a game like this. This is the leap I've been waiting for. 80.3 on SWE-Bench Pro vs Opus 4.8 at 69.2, the biggest jump I have ever seen on that benchmark. It passed GPT 5.5 in both coding and intelligence on Artificial Analysis. I already canceled my $200 ChatGPT Pro plan. It fixed a Bridge Voice bug in one shot that GPT 5.5, Opus 4.7, and Opus 4.8 all failed to crack for 2 months. 10/10. Best model I have ever used. Full review below.

BridgeMind

19,020 次观看 • 17 天前

🚨 Gemini Snowbunny - ONE SHOTTED Google really cooked here , prompt is in the quoted tweet , see the windows 11 clone I dont want to hype it , like we never get these beautiful model in public, like FR compute is the only bottleneck for all labs

🚨 Gemini Snowbunny - ONE SHOTTED Google really cooked here , prompt is in the quoted tweet , see the windows 11 clone I dont want to hype it , like we never get these beautiful model in public, like FR compute is the only bottleneck for all labs

Chetaslua

96,481 次观看 • 5 个月前

OpenAI took the best Coding model in the world GPT-5.3 Codex And turned it into a powerful coding app It's called Codex, but most people have no idea what you can build with it.

OpenAI took the best Coding model in the world GPT-5.3 Codex And turned it into a powerful coding app It's called Codex, but most people have no idea what you can build with it.

David Ondrej

24,917 次观看 • 4 个月前

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.5 tested both on High settings with the same prompt > Fable one shotted everything in 15 minutes and used 3% of weekly limits > GPT 5.5 took 20 minutes and used 3% of weekly limits 5.5 is not looking good here at all which one do you think won?

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.5 tested both on High settings with the same prompt > Fable one shotted everything in 15 minutes and used 3% of weekly limits > GPT 5.5 took 20 minutes and used 3% of weekly limits 5.5 is not looking good here at all which one do you think won?

J A Z I I

104,994 次观看 • 18 天前