Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

The smartest physicist quit physics to build AI. Here’s why that matters. In a recent interview, Demis Hassabis lays out one of the clearest origin stories for modern AI I’ve heard. He starts as a physics kid obsessed with the big stuff: reality, consciousness, why anything exists at all.... Feynman was his hero. But then comes the uncomfortable realization: for decades, fundamental physics barely moved. The deepest questions stayed stuck. So he pivots. Not away from truth, but toward leverage. If the human brain is the bottleneck, don’t push harder on the same brain. Build a new one. AI, in his framing, isn’t a product. It’s the ultimate scientific instrument. A tool to smash through the ceiling that human cognition hit in physics, biology, and beyond. And the twist is beautiful: By trying to build intelligence, we’re forced to understand our own. AI becomes both microscope and mirror. This isn’t about apps or chatbots. It’s about finishing the questions physics couldn’t.show more

VraserX e/acc

20,640 subscribers

77,489 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 Elon Musk on Grok 3.5: "With Grok 3.5, that is about to be released, it's trying to reason from first principles. The focus of Grok 3.5 is to find the fundamentals of physics and applying physics tools across all lines of reasoning and to aspire to truth with minimal error. So apply kind of the tools of physics to thinking, and you know physics, if you violate conservation of energy or momentum, then you're either going to get a Nobel Prize, or you're wrong. We aim to get to truth with acknowledged error, but minimize that error over time. And I think that's actually extremely important for AI safety. So I've put a lot for a long time about AI safety, and conclusion is the old maxim that honesty is the best policy."

🚨 Elon Musk on Grok 3.5: "With Grok 3.5, that is about to be released, it's trying to reason from first principles. The focus of Grok 3.5 is to find the fundamentals of physics and applying physics tools across all lines of reasoning and to aspire to truth with minimal error. So apply kind of the tools of physics to thinking, and you know physics, if you violate conservation of energy or momentum, then you're either going to get a Nobel Prize, or you're wrong. We aim to get to truth with acknowledged error, but minimize that error over time. And I think that's actually extremely important for AI safety. So I've put a lot for a long time about AI safety, and conclusion is the old maxim that honesty is the best policy."

DogeDesigner

199,274 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

ELON MUSK: IT'S INCREDIBLY IMPORTANT FOR AI MODELS TO BE GROUNDED IN REALITY - "Physics is the law, and everything else is a recommendation" - People break human-made laws, but no one breaks the laws of physics - AI must be grounded in reality to ensure it is truthful and accurate - Examples of this necessity: Cars: Must drive safely and correctly. Optimus (Humanoid Robot): Must perform the physical tasks it is asked to do - Adhering to the laws of physics is helpful for ensuring the model is truthful - A somewhat overlooked point: To be really intelligent, AI has to make predictions that are in line with reality

ELON MUSK: IT'S INCREDIBLY IMPORTANT FOR AI MODELS TO BE GROUNDED IN REALITY - "Physics is the law, and everything else is a recommendation" - People break human-made laws, but no one breaks the laws of physics - AI must be grounded in reality to ensure it is truthful and accurate - Examples of this necessity: Cars: Must drive safely and correctly. Optimus (Humanoid Robot): Must perform the physical tasks it is asked to do - Adhering to the laws of physics is helpful for ensuring the model is truthful - A somewhat overlooked point: To be really intelligent, AI has to make predictions that are in line with reality

X Freeze

45,446 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Elon Musk explains why it's incredibly important for AI models to be grounded in reality "Physics is the law, and everything else is a recommendation. People break human-made laws, but no one breaks the laws of physics" AI must be grounded in reality to be truthful and accurate Examples: Cars: Must drive safely and correctly Optimus: Must perform real physical tasks A somewhat overlooked point: To be really intelligent, AI has to make predictions in line with reality (in other words, physics)

Elon Musk explains why it's incredibly important for AI models to be grounded in reality "Physics is the law, and everything else is a recommendation. People break human-made laws, but no one breaks the laws of physics" AI must be grounded in reality to be truthful and accurate Examples: Cars: Must drive safely and correctly Optimus: Must perform real physical tasks A somewhat overlooked point: To be really intelligent, AI has to make predictions in line with reality (in other words, physics)

X Freeze

26,391 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Elon Musk: I strongly recommend studying physics as a grounding to understand reality. “I studied physics, and I certainly strongly recommend physics as a good grounding to understand the nature of reality. Physics is fundamentally just understanding how the universe actually works. That's a good foundation for a variety of engineering disciplines. The analytical constructs used in physics [like first-principles thinking] apply to basically anything. Most people tend to think by analogy or by comparison with something that already exists. This is a mental shortcut that requires less brain strain, but it's hard to get fundamental insights unless you think about things from a first-principles standpoint.” Axel Springer Award, December 1, 2020

Elon Musk: I strongly recommend studying physics as a grounding to understand reality. “I studied physics, and I certainly strongly recommend physics as a good grounding to understand the nature of reality. Physics is fundamentally just understanding how the universe actually works. That's a good foundation for a variety of engineering disciplines. The analytical constructs used in physics [like first-principles thinking] apply to basically anything. Most people tend to think by analogy or by comparison with something that already exists. This is a mental shortcut that requires less brain strain, but it's hard to get fundamental insights unless you think about things from a first-principles standpoint.” Axel Springer Award, December 1, 2020

ELON CLIPS

1,272,265 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Elon Musk: To be truly intelligent, AI models must be able to predict the future in accordance with physics. “It's incredibly important for an AI model to be grounded in reality. I have a saying, physics is the law and everything else is a recommendation. I've seen many people break human-made laws, but I have not seen anyone break the laws of physics. So we should ground any given AI against reality. In reality, for example, the car needs to drive safely and correctly, the humanoid robot Optimus needs to perform the task that it's being asked to perform. These are things that are very helpful for ensuring that the model is truthful and accurate because it has to adhere to the laws of physics. What's maybe somewhat overlooked or at least not talked about enough, is that to really be intelligent, it's got to make predictions that are in line with reality, in other words, physics. It's a really fundamental thing and being able to ground that with cars and robots is very important.” From: Interview with Satya Nadella, May 19, 2025

Elon Musk: To be truly intelligent, AI models must be able to predict the future in accordance with physics. “It's incredibly important for an AI model to be grounded in reality. I have a saying, physics is the law and everything else is a recommendation. I've seen many people break human-made laws, but I have not seen anyone break the laws of physics. So we should ground any given AI against reality. In reality, for example, the car needs to drive safely and correctly, the humanoid robot Optimus needs to perform the task that it's being asked to perform. These are things that are very helpful for ensuring that the model is truthful and accurate because it has to adhere to the laws of physics. What's maybe somewhat overlooked or at least not talked about enough, is that to really be intelligent, it's got to make predictions that are in line with reality, in other words, physics. It's a really fundamental thing and being able to ground that with cars and robots is very important.” From: Interview with Satya Nadella, May 19, 2025

ELON CLIPS

20,562 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

ELON: "PHYSICS IS THE LAW, IT IS THE ONLY UNBREAKABLE GUARDRAIL FOR AI" Elon is drawing a hard line between the bending the rules of society and the absolute constraints of the universe. In a world where AI can "hallucinate" fiction as fact, Elon says that the ultimate test for any intelligent system is its ability to ground its predictions in physical reality. Physics isn't just a subject, it is the only "law" that cannot be dodged, making it the essential foundation for ensuring AI remains truthful and functional: “It's incredibly important for an AI model to be grounded in reality. I have a saying, which is physics is the law and everything else is a recommendation. I'm not suggesting people break the laws made by humans... but I've seen many people break human-made laws, but I have not seen anyone break the laws of physics.” Source: ELON CLIPS Elon Musk

ELON: "PHYSICS IS THE LAW, IT IS THE ONLY UNBREAKABLE GUARDRAIL FOR AI" Elon is drawing a hard line between the bending the rules of society and the absolute constraints of the universe. In a world where AI can "hallucinate" fiction as fact, Elon says that the ultimate test for any intelligent system is its ability to ground its predictions in physical reality. Physics isn't just a subject, it is the only "law" that cannot be dodged, making it the essential foundation for ensuring AI remains truthful and functional: “It's incredibly important for an AI model to be grounded in reality. I have a saying, which is physics is the law and everything else is a recommendation. I'm not suggesting people break the laws made by humans... but I've seen many people break human-made laws, but I have not seen anyone break the laws of physics.” Source: ELON CLIPS Elon Musk

Mario Nawfal

50,199 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Elon Musk just stripped away every emotional narrative around paralysis and reduced it to a pure engineering equation. The human nervous system is not mystical. It is a biological wiring grid. When a wire breaks, you build a bypass. Traditional medicine treats a severed spinal cord as a permanent biological endpoint. Musk treats it as a broken routing switch. Musk: “It’s basically a communications bridge. You bridge the communications from the motor cortex past the point in the neck or spine where the nerves are damaged.” Not a miracle. Not a mystery. A bridge. Musk: “It is possible from a physics standpoint to restore full body functionality. There is nothing that prevents it happening from a physics standpoint.” The physics already check out. This is not a question of possibility. It is a question of execution speed. We are building AGI by mastering computational physics in silicon. Neuralink is applying that same mastery to carbon. The human body is not a sacred text. It is a machine. And machines can be patched. But this is bigger than medicine. Humanity’s ability to interface with superintelligence is currently bottlenecked by thumbs typing on a glass screen. Neuralink is the solution to that constraint dressed as a medical device. If you can bridge the brain past a broken spine, you can bridge the brain to a data center. Healing the paralyzed is step one. Merging with superintelligence is the endgame. Musk: “It’s a very hard technical problem, right, but there is nothing that prevents it happening from a physics standpoint.” Somewhere right now, a person is sitting in a wheelchair. An engineer is sitting in a lab. Neither knows the other exists. But one of them is quietly rewriting the definition of permanent. And it isn’t the one in the wheelchair.

Elon Musk just stripped away every emotional narrative around paralysis and reduced it to a pure engineering equation. The human nervous system is not mystical. It is a biological wiring grid. When a wire breaks, you build a bypass. Traditional medicine treats a severed spinal cord as a permanent biological endpoint. Musk treats it as a broken routing switch. Musk: “It’s basically a communications bridge. You bridge the communications from the motor cortex past the point in the neck or spine where the nerves are damaged.” Not a miracle. Not a mystery. A bridge. Musk: “It is possible from a physics standpoint to restore full body functionality. There is nothing that prevents it happening from a physics standpoint.” The physics already check out. This is not a question of possibility. It is a question of execution speed. We are building AGI by mastering computational physics in silicon. Neuralink is applying that same mastery to carbon. The human body is not a sacred text. It is a machine. And machines can be patched. But this is bigger than medicine. Humanity’s ability to interface with superintelligence is currently bottlenecked by thumbs typing on a glass screen. Neuralink is the solution to that constraint dressed as a medical device. If you can bridge the brain past a broken spine, you can bridge the brain to a data center. Healing the paralyzed is step one. Merging with superintelligence is the endgame. Musk: “It’s a very hard technical problem, right, but there is nothing that prevents it happening from a physics standpoint.” Somewhere right now, a person is sitting in a wheelchair. An engineer is sitting in a lab. Neither knows the other exists. But one of them is quietly rewriting the definition of permanent. And it isn’t the one in the wheelchair.

Dustin

508,967 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Had the pleasure of speaking with Philip Goff , philosopher and panpsychist, about AI consciousness. Key moments: - On AI sentience: consciousness is biological, not computational. In his view, no current AI is conscious, nor would computation based AI be. How does this relate to his panpsychist worldview of consciousness? There are different takes on panpsychism within the community. His own view is that it's not clear how micro-conscious particles actually create a unified conscious system. - We need collaboration between scientists and philosophers on consciousness research. On a practical level, divide scientists into teams that work on separate philosophical assumptions and see what comes out of it (granted there are resources to run such experiments). - Perhaps consciousness brings new causal dynamics not reducible to known physics/chemistry — "strong emergence," as Philip calls it. As a contrast: Sean Carroll argues physics runs the whole show, but neuroscientist Kevin Mitchell argues that biological complexity might behave in ways physics wouldn't predict. In other words, we look to physics to solve the consciousness problem, but that might be the wrong path, especially if consciousness is biological rather than computational. The link to the full discussion below.

Had the pleasure of speaking with Philip Goff , philosopher and panpsychist, about AI consciousness. Key moments: - On AI sentience: consciousness is biological, not computational. In his view, no current AI is conscious, nor would computation based AI be. How does this relate to his panpsychist worldview of consciousness? There are different takes on panpsychism within the community. His own view is that it's not clear how micro-conscious particles actually create a unified conscious system. - We need collaboration between scientists and philosophers on consciousness research. On a practical level, divide scientists into teams that work on separate philosophical assumptions and see what comes out of it (granted there are resources to run such experiments). - Perhaps consciousness brings new causal dynamics not reducible to known physics/chemistry — "strong emergence," as Philip calls it. As a contrast: Sean Carroll argues physics runs the whole show, but neuroscientist Kevin Mitchell argues that biological complexity might behave in ways physics wouldn't predict. In other words, we look to physics to solve the consciousness problem, but that might be the wrong path, especially if consciousness is biological rather than computational. The link to the full discussion below.

Sophia

10,850 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Elon Musk: To really be intelligent, AI has to make predictions that are in line with reality. “It's incredibly important for an AI model to be grounded in reality. I have a saying, which is physics is the law and everything else is a recommendation. I'm not suggesting people break the laws made by humans, we should generally obey the laws of humans. But I've seen many people break human made laws, but I have not seen anyone break the laws of physics. So, for any given AI, grounding it against reality and reality, for example, as you mentioned with the car, it needs to drive safely and correctly. The humanoid robot Optimus needs to perform the task that it's being asked to perform. These are things that are very helpful for ensuring that the model is truthful and accurate because it has to adhere to the laws of physics. So I think that's actually maybe somewhat overlooked or at least not talked about enough is that to really be intelligent it's got to make predictions that are in line with reality. In other words, physics.” Conversation with Satya Nadella, May 19, 2025

Elon Musk: To really be intelligent, AI has to make predictions that are in line with reality. “It's incredibly important for an AI model to be grounded in reality. I have a saying, which is physics is the law and everything else is a recommendation. I'm not suggesting people break the laws made by humans, we should generally obey the laws of humans. But I've seen many people break human made laws, but I have not seen anyone break the laws of physics. So, for any given AI, grounding it against reality and reality, for example, as you mentioned with the car, it needs to drive safely and correctly. The humanoid robot Optimus needs to perform the task that it's being asked to perform. These are things that are very helpful for ensuring that the model is truthful and accurate because it has to adhere to the laws of physics. So I think that's actually maybe somewhat overlooked or at least not talked about enough is that to really be intelligent it's got to make predictions that are in line with reality. In other words, physics.” Conversation with Satya Nadella, May 19, 2025

ELON CLIPS

30,805 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Elon Musk: To really be intelligent, AI has to make predictions that are in line with reality. “It's incredibly important for an AI model to be grounded in reality. I have a saying, which is physics is the law and everything else is a recommendation. I'm not suggesting people break the laws made by humans, we should generally obey the laws of humans. But I've seen many people break human made laws, but I have not seen anyone break the laws of physics. So, for any given AI, grounding it against reality and reality, for example, as you mentioned with the car, it needs to drive safely and correctly. The humanoid robot Optimus needs to perform the task that it's being asked to perform. These are things that are very helpful for ensuring that the model is truthful and accurate because it has to adhere to the laws of physics. So I think that's actually maybe somewhat overlooked or at least not talked about enough is that to really be intelligent it's got to make predictions that are in line with reality. In other words, physics.” Conversation with Satya Nadella, May 19, 2025

Elon Musk: To really be intelligent, AI has to make predictions that are in line with reality. “It's incredibly important for an AI model to be grounded in reality. I have a saying, which is physics is the law and everything else is a recommendation. I'm not suggesting people break the laws made by humans, we should generally obey the laws of humans. But I've seen many people break human made laws, but I have not seen anyone break the laws of physics. So, for any given AI, grounding it against reality and reality, for example, as you mentioned with the car, it needs to drive safely and correctly. The humanoid robot Optimus needs to perform the task that it's being asked to perform. These are things that are very helpful for ensuring that the model is truthful and accurate because it has to adhere to the laws of physics. So I think that's actually maybe somewhat overlooked or at least not talked about enough is that to really be intelligent it's got to make predictions that are in line with reality. In other words, physics.” Conversation with Satya Nadella, May 19, 2025

ELON CLIPS

680,153 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

AI Validates the Truth of Buddhism | Philosophy x AI In this interview, Imperial’s Murray Shanahan Murray Shanahan lays out a systematic procedure to validate machine consciousness. You might think the question of whether AIs are conscious is a trivial, theoretical fancy with no use in the real world. This interview will show you why it’s one of the most important questions with practical implications for not just how we treat AI systems but also how we build and align them. But the most unexpected reward of investigating AI consciousness turns out to be what it reveals about our consciousness, about the nature of the human self. Murray’s most interesting claim is that LLMs have an important buddhist lesson to teach all of us, namely, that there is no “us.” By better understanding the "no-self" of LLMs we are given a mirror to reflect on whether human selves are also an illusion. Timestamps: 08:26 Why Buddhist Enlightenment May be Easier for Software Programs 16:30 Super-Intelligent AI Might Not Want To Take Over the World 30:25 Wittgenstein’s Radical Take on Consciousness 42:55 What Video Games Teach Us About Consciousness 49:59 How the Movie Ex Machina Created a Better Test for AI Consciousness 1:02:36 What the Debate about AI Consciousness Is Missing 1:09:31 Does Conscious AI Have A Moral Right to Live? 1:15:01 Is the Human Brain Computationally Superior to AI? 1:26:59 Why Philosophy Is the Essential Skill for the AI Age

AI Validates the Truth of Buddhism | Philosophy x AI In this interview, Imperial’s Murray Shanahan Murray Shanahan lays out a systematic procedure to validate machine consciousness. You might think the question of whether AIs are conscious is a trivial, theoretical fancy with no use in the real world. This interview will show you why it’s one of the most important questions with practical implications for not just how we treat AI systems but also how we build and align them. But the most unexpected reward of investigating AI consciousness turns out to be what it reveals about our consciousness, about the nature of the human self. Murray’s most interesting claim is that LLMs have an important buddhist lesson to teach all of us, namely, that there is no “us.” By better understanding the "no-self" of LLMs we are given a mirror to reflect on whether human selves are also an illusion. Timestamps: 08:26 Why Buddhist Enlightenment May be Easier for Software Programs 16:30 Super-Intelligent AI Might Not Want To Take Over the World 30:25 Wittgenstein’s Radical Take on Consciousness 42:55 What Video Games Teach Us About Consciousness 49:59 How the Movie Ex Machina Created a Better Test for AI Consciousness 1:02:36 What the Debate about AI Consciousness Is Missing 1:09:31 Does Conscious AI Have A Moral Right to Live? 1:15:01 Is the Human Brain Computationally Superior to AI? 1:26:59 Why Philosophy Is the Essential Skill for the AI Age

Johnathan Bi

30,521 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Elon Musk: Grok 3.5 uses the tools of physics to get to the truth with minimal error. “Grok, especially Grok 3.5, is trying to reason from first principles, so apply the tools of physics to thinking. If you're trying to get to fundamental truths, you boil things down to the axiomatic elements that are most likely to be correct, and then you reason up from there, and you can test your conclusions against those axiomatic elements. In physics, if you violate conservation of energy or momentum, then you're either going to get a Nobel Prize or you're wrong. And you're almost certainly wrong. That's really the focus of Grok 3.5: finding the fundamentals of physics and applying physics tools across all lines of reasoning and to aspire to truth with minimal error. There's always going to be some mistakes that are made, but we aim to get to the truth with acknowledged error, but minimize that error over time. And I think that's actually extremely important for AI safety. I've thought a lot for a long time about AI safety, and my ultimate conclusion is the old maxim that honesty is the best policy. It really is for safety.” Conversation with Satya Nadella, May 19, 2025

Elon Musk: Grok 3.5 uses the tools of physics to get to the truth with minimal error. “Grok, especially Grok 3.5, is trying to reason from first principles, so apply the tools of physics to thinking. If you're trying to get to fundamental truths, you boil things down to the axiomatic elements that are most likely to be correct, and then you reason up from there, and you can test your conclusions against those axiomatic elements. In physics, if you violate conservation of energy or momentum, then you're either going to get a Nobel Prize or you're wrong. And you're almost certainly wrong. That's really the focus of Grok 3.5: finding the fundamentals of physics and applying physics tools across all lines of reasoning and to aspire to truth with minimal error. There's always going to be some mistakes that are made, but we aim to get to the truth with acknowledged error, but minimize that error over time. And I think that's actually extremely important for AI safety. I've thought a lot for a long time about AI safety, and my ultimate conclusion is the old maxim that honesty is the best policy. It really is for safety.” Conversation with Satya Nadella, May 19, 2025

ELON CLIPS

21,462 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Eric Weinstein drops a truth bomb that shakes the very foundations of modern science. In 1973, physics froze. While Crocodile Rock topped the charts, humanity’s understanding of base reality came to a grinding halt. The deepest theories of our universe? They’re all on one slide—unchanged for over 50 years. The Disturbing Revelation: Mark Andreessen’s White House meeting unveiled a chilling reality—the deliberate stagnation of theoretical physics. String theory was crowned the "only game in town," while rival ideas were suffocated. Careers were quietly sunset. The youngest living Nobel laureate in theoretical physics? Now over 70. The field isn’t advancing—it’s repeating. The Quantum Gravity Mirage: "Quantum gravity is the holy grail!"—a mantra drilled into generations of physicists. But if it’s so fundamental, why did no books mention it before 1972? Because the real breakthrough lies beyond Einstein, beyond the speed of light. Yet researchers are trapped in a safe, sterile loop—studying theories that hurt no one, change nothing. The Escape Plan: Earth is a womb, not a home. To survive, we must reach the stars. But with physics shackled, how? The Perimeter Institute was meant to break barriers—yet even it fell to the quantum gravity dogma. The West must lead again, but the true rival isn’t China or India—it’s France, home of the world’s greatest mathematicians. The Choice: We stand at a crossroads. Wars loom, time dwindles—but if we revitalize physics, if we dare to go beyond C, the cosmos awaits. The end of physics? No—the beginning. The stars are calling. Will we answer? The future is glorious. But only if we fight for it.

Eric Weinstein drops a truth bomb that shakes the very foundations of modern science. In 1973, physics froze. While Crocodile Rock topped the charts, humanity’s understanding of base reality came to a grinding halt. The deepest theories of our universe? They’re all on one slide—unchanged for over 50 years. The Disturbing Revelation: Mark Andreessen’s White House meeting unveiled a chilling reality—the deliberate stagnation of theoretical physics. String theory was crowned the "only game in town," while rival ideas were suffocated. Careers were quietly sunset. The youngest living Nobel laureate in theoretical physics? Now over 70. The field isn’t advancing—it’s repeating. The Quantum Gravity Mirage: "Quantum gravity is the holy grail!"—a mantra drilled into generations of physicists. But if it’s so fundamental, why did no books mention it before 1972? Because the real breakthrough lies beyond Einstein, beyond the speed of light. Yet researchers are trapped in a safe, sterile loop—studying theories that hurt no one, change nothing. The Escape Plan: Earth is a womb, not a home. To survive, we must reach the stars. But with physics shackled, how? The Perimeter Institute was meant to break barriers—yet even it fell to the quantum gravity dogma. The West must lead again, but the true rival isn’t China or India—it’s France, home of the world’s greatest mathematicians. The Choice: We stand at a crossroads. Wars loom, time dwindles—but if we revitalize physics, if we dare to go beyond C, the cosmos awaits. The end of physics? No—the beginning. The stars are calling. Will we answer? The future is glorious. But only if we fight for it.

Camus

367,863 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Elon Musk clearly explains why Grok must be maximally truth-seeking: “I think you want Grok to say things that are true, even if they’re not politically correct” Focus on cogent reasoning - make sure axioms as close to true as possible, no contradictions, and conclusions that necessarily follow with the right probability. It’s just critical thinking 101 The proof is in the pudding: For any AI to discover new physics or build technology in reality that actually works... there is BS physics, you have to be extremely truth-seeking Physics is the law. Everything else is just a recommendation. If your rocket design is wrong, it blows up. Reality doesn’t lie

Elon Musk clearly explains why Grok must be maximally truth-seeking: “I think you want Grok to say things that are true, even if they’re not politically correct” Focus on cogent reasoning - make sure axioms as close to true as possible, no contradictions, and conclusions that necessarily follow with the right probability. It’s just critical thinking 101 The proof is in the pudding: For any AI to discover new physics or build technology in reality that actually works... there is BS physics, you have to be extremely truth-seeking Physics is the law. Everything else is just a recommendation. If your rocket design is wrong, it blows up. Reality doesn’t lie

X Freeze

20,859 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Why are CEOs of AI companies privately warning about the extinction of humans? To understand that, I’m joined by someone who helped build the field… Stuart Russell is one of the world’s leading AI researchers. He co-wrote Artificial Intelligence*: ‘*A Modern Approach’ - the textbook used to train AI engineers in more than 1,500 universities. He has spent decades advising governments and global leaders on the safety and control of advanced AI. Right now, the people building the most powerful AI systems are raising alarms in private that they rarely voice in public. Some estimate up to a 25% chance that AI could lead to human extinction… Stuart has heard these conversations directly. He believes we’re in a race we don’t really understand, pushed by incentives no one is really controlling.

Why are CEOs of AI companies privately warning about the extinction of humans? To understand that, I’m joined by someone who helped build the field… Stuart Russell is one of the world’s leading AI researchers. He co-wrote Artificial Intelligence: ‘A Modern Approach’ - the textbook used to train AI engineers in more than 1,500 universities. He has spent decades advising governments and global leaders on the safety and control of advanced AI. Right now, the people building the most powerful AI systems are raising alarms in private that they rarely voice in public. Some estimate up to a 25% chance that AI could lead to human extinction… Stuart has heard these conversations directly. He believes we’re in a race we don’t really understand, pushed by incentives no one is really controlling.

Steven Bartlett

16,981 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten