Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

The Spheres severely disrupt the ‘Alien Disclosure’ process… Because they aren’t ’Alien’…but they also aren’t ’Ours’. I understand certain privileged corporations and black projects probably have comparable tech now… But, as crazy as it sounds… The network of metallic spheres that is seen ALL over our planet, and has...

digijordan's profile picture

Jordan Crowder

73,577 subscribers

170,945 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологииНовости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

60 years ago, Ronald Reagan gave Americans a warning that has stood the test of time. This is from Reagan's "Time for Choosing" speech: "If we lose freedom here, there is no place to escape to. This is the last stand on Earth. And this idea that government is beholden to the people, that it has no other source of power except to sovereign people, is still the newest and most unique idea in all the long history of man's relation to man. This is the issue of this election. Whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far-distant capital can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves." "You and I are told increasingly that we have to choose between a left or right, but I would like to suggest that there is no such thing as a left or right. There is only an up or down--up to a man's age-old dream, the ultimate in individual freedom consistent with law and order--or down to the ant heap totalitarianism, and regardless of their sincerity, their humanitarian motives, those who would trade our freedom for security have embarked on this downward course." ... "Well, I for one resent it when a representative of the people refers to you and me--the free man and woman of this country--as 'the masses.' This is a term we haven't applied to ourselves in America. But beyond that, 'the full power of centralized government'--this was the very thing the Founding Fathers sought to minimize. They knew that governments don't control things. A government can't control the economy without controlling people. And they know when a government sets out to do that, it must use force and coercion to achieve its purpose. They also knew, those Founding Fathers, that outside of its legitimate functions, government does nothing as well or as economically as the private sector of the economy." ... "They say we are always 'against' things, never 'for' anything. Well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn't so." ... "Mr. Democrat himself, Al Smith, the great American, came before the American people and charged that the leadership of his party was taking the part of Jefferson, Jackson, and Cleveland down the road under the banners of Marx, Lenin, and Stalin." ... "Our natural, inalienable rights are now considered to be a dispensation of government, and freedom has never been so fragile, so close to slipping from our grasp as it is at this moment." ... "You and I know and do not believe that life is so dear and peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery. If nothing in life is worth dying for, when did this begin--just in the face of this enemy? Or should Moses have told the children of Israel to live in slavery under the pharaohs? Should Christ have refused the cross? Should the patriots at Concord Bridge have thrown down their guns and refused to fire the shot heard 'round the world? The martyrs of history were not fools, and our honored dead who gave their lives to stop the advance of the Nazis didn't die in vain. Where, then, is the road to peace? Well, it's a simple answer after all." "You and I have the courage to say to our enemies, 'There is a price we will not pay.' There is a point beyond which they must not advance." ... "You and I have a rendezvous with destiny. We will preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on Earth, or we will sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness." Doesn't it feel like Reagan is speaking to us TODAY?
7:05

60 years ago, Ronald Reagan gave Americans a warning that has stood the test of time. This is from Reagan's "Time for Choosing" speech: "If we lose freedom here, there is no place to escape to. This is the last stand on Earth. And this idea that government is beholden to the people, that it has no other source of power except to sovereign people, is still the newest and most unique idea in all the long history of man's relation to man. This is the issue of this election. Whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far-distant capital can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves." "You and I are told increasingly that we have to choose between a left or right, but I would like to suggest that there is no such thing as a left or right. There is only an up or down--up to a man's age-old dream, the ultimate in individual freedom consistent with law and order--or down to the ant heap totalitarianism, and regardless of their sincerity, their humanitarian motives, those who would trade our freedom for security have embarked on this downward course." ... "Well, I for one resent it when a representative of the people refers to you and me--the free man and woman of this country--as 'the masses.' This is a term we haven't applied to ourselves in America. But beyond that, 'the full power of centralized government'--this was the very thing the Founding Fathers sought to minimize. They knew that governments don't control things. A government can't control the economy without controlling people. And they know when a government sets out to do that, it must use force and coercion to achieve its purpose. They also knew, those Founding Fathers, that outside of its legitimate functions, government does nothing as well or as economically as the private sector of the economy." ... "They say we are always 'against' things, never 'for' anything. Well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn't so." ... "Mr. Democrat himself, Al Smith, the great American, came before the American people and charged that the leadership of his party was taking the part of Jefferson, Jackson, and Cleveland down the road under the banners of Marx, Lenin, and Stalin." ... "Our natural, inalienable rights are now considered to be a dispensation of government, and freedom has never been so fragile, so close to slipping from our grasp as it is at this moment." ... "You and I know and do not believe that life is so dear and peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery. If nothing in life is worth dying for, when did this begin--just in the face of this enemy? Or should Moses have told the children of Israel to live in slavery under the pharaohs? Should Christ have refused the cross? Should the patriots at Concord Bridge have thrown down their guns and refused to fire the shot heard 'round the world? The martyrs of history were not fools, and our honored dead who gave their lives to stop the advance of the Nazis didn't die in vain. Where, then, is the road to peace? Well, it's a simple answer after all." "You and I have the courage to say to our enemies, 'There is a price we will not pay.' There is a point beyond which they must not advance." ... "You and I have a rendezvous with destiny. We will preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on Earth, or we will sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness." Doesn't it feel like Reagan is speaking to us TODAY?

Kyle Becker

104,357 просмотров • 1 год назад

👽 Is The UFO Phenomenon "Attacking" Us and We Just Don't Realize It? 👽 "We're not seeing any aggression right now [from the UFO Phenomenon." ~Mellon "They might have been attacking us for centuries already...through the manipulation of consciousness." ~Levenda (IMO, this is a very limited view of things from Mellon. I'll include more from Levenda after this short transcript.) Christopher K. Mellon: "The research that I've seen - it was quite a while ago, but - makes the logical point that a great deal of the reaction [and] impact will depend on the context. So, let's assume for a moment that things continue as they have been, which is, no aggression, no hostility, surveillance, whatever. A presence, an elusive presence. "That will be received, likely fairly, with less concern and disruption, obviously, than if it was a, you know, 'Independence-Day' scenario. I mean, we don't anticipate...we're not seeing any aggression right now. We have concerns about the seeming interest in DOD facilities, but we're not seeing any kind of hostility. This has been going on for a long, long time. Chances are it'll probably continue more or less as it has, which isn't disrupting or Earth-threatening." (All of that, apparent, interest in our DOD facilities and surveillance, may be misdirection from what the phenomenon is actually doing here. That MUST be considered.) Leslie Kean: "Yeah, that's a really good point. And I think it also depends on what is actually said when the announcement is made, and also what kind of proof is presented. Because they're gonna have to offer something to really prove that this is not just...that this is the real deal." ~~~ (IMO, this is the way we SHOULD look at the phenomenon, and this essay is a big reason why I value Peter Levenda's opinion so highly. I can't recommend it enough and I'll link to the entire thing in the replies.) Levenda: "If people insist on projecting their ideas about humans and human incentives onto the 'alien' and claiming (a) that the 'alien' has no designs on us and only comes in peace, or (b) that since the 'alien' has not attacked us so far even though they could have, easily, then their intentions must be peaceful … etc etc; these are all points of view that are inconsistent with what we do know. By definition, the 'alien' should not be considered 'human' in the sense we understand that term. We have no idea what environment gave rise to the 'alien', what its values are, how it views us. We don’t know what is important to them, and we don’t know what or how they think about what is important to us. We keep projecting our (21st century North American) ideas, concepts, and conceits onto a Phenomenon about which we know virtually nothing. Ironically, the less we know about It the easier that projection becomes. We accept that their technology is somehow superior to ours, without being able to define 'superior' in that context, instead of just 'other'. Some of us assume that if the 'alien' has superior technology then it must be spiritually or morally superior as well. When has that ever been the case on this planet in all of our recorded history? Technologically advanced civilizations routinely invade, colonize, and brutalize less advanced ones. Thus, we have no expectation – based purely on our own experience as human beings of planet Earth – that another race would be benign. In fact, we would have to anticipate the worst. "A better approach might be to ascertain whether the 'alien' is hostile rather than 'evil': hostile to all humans, hostile to some humans, hostile to other life forms on our planet, etc. There are those who insist that this cannot be the case, that if they are hostile they would have wiped us out already. We have already addressed that argument above, but briefly: we can’t assume that they would act the way we have acted in our history. Their life expectancy, timelines and schedules might be extremely long compared to ours. Or extremely short. We simply don’t know and should not assume anything. "Hostility implies intent: that they 'intend' to destroy us somehow. They have not done so, the argument goes, so they must not be hostile. The problem with this argument is that we are assuming they would manifest their hostility by blowing something up, or attacking us the way we attack and invade our enemies. They might have been attacking us for centuries already, in ways that make sense to them and which further an agenda we can’t begin to imagine or understand. "What if they are attacking us through the manipulation of consciousness? That sounds far-fetched, but we have been doing that ourselves for a long time. It’s called psychological warfare, and includes propaganda, disinformation, misinformation, etc. including – again ironically – using the UFO Phenomenon as a means of distracting us from our own secret weapons systems. "Many contactees report communication with the 'alien' by means of telepathy. That automatically presents us with the possibility that human consciousness may be vulnerable to direct outside interference or manipulation by the 'alien.' "We are simply not trying hard enough to understand the 'alien'. "We must proceed on the assumption that the Phenomenon is dangerous to us (perhaps in ways we can’t imagine, and I can’t stress that enough) and proceed slowly and carefully."
1:18

👽 Is The UFO Phenomenon "Attacking" Us and We Just Don't Realize It? 👽 "We're not seeing any aggression right now [from the UFO Phenomenon." ~Mellon "They might have been attacking us for centuries already...through the manipulation of consciousness." ~Levenda (IMO, this is a very limited view of things from Mellon. I'll include more from Levenda after this short transcript.) Christopher K. Mellon: "The research that I've seen - it was quite a while ago, but - makes the logical point that a great deal of the reaction [and] impact will depend on the context. So, let's assume for a moment that things continue as they have been, which is, no aggression, no hostility, surveillance, whatever. A presence, an elusive presence. "That will be received, likely fairly, with less concern and disruption, obviously, than if it was a, you know, 'Independence-Day' scenario. I mean, we don't anticipate...we're not seeing any aggression right now. We have concerns about the seeming interest in DOD facilities, but we're not seeing any kind of hostility. This has been going on for a long, long time. Chances are it'll probably continue more or less as it has, which isn't disrupting or Earth-threatening." (All of that, apparent, interest in our DOD facilities and surveillance, may be misdirection from what the phenomenon is actually doing here. That MUST be considered.) Leslie Kean: "Yeah, that's a really good point. And I think it also depends on what is actually said when the announcement is made, and also what kind of proof is presented. Because they're gonna have to offer something to really prove that this is not just...that this is the real deal." ~~~ (IMO, this is the way we SHOULD look at the phenomenon, and this essay is a big reason why I value Peter Levenda's opinion so highly. I can't recommend it enough and I'll link to the entire thing in the replies.) Levenda: "If people insist on projecting their ideas about humans and human incentives onto the 'alien' and claiming (a) that the 'alien' has no designs on us and only comes in peace, or (b) that since the 'alien' has not attacked us so far even though they could have, easily, then their intentions must be peaceful … etc etc; these are all points of view that are inconsistent with what we do know. By definition, the 'alien' should not be considered 'human' in the sense we understand that term. We have no idea what environment gave rise to the 'alien', what its values are, how it views us. We don’t know what is important to them, and we don’t know what or how they think about what is important to us. We keep projecting our (21st century North American) ideas, concepts, and conceits onto a Phenomenon about which we know virtually nothing. Ironically, the less we know about It the easier that projection becomes. We accept that their technology is somehow superior to ours, without being able to define 'superior' in that context, instead of just 'other'. Some of us assume that if the 'alien' has superior technology then it must be spiritually or morally superior as well. When has that ever been the case on this planet in all of our recorded history? Technologically advanced civilizations routinely invade, colonize, and brutalize less advanced ones. Thus, we have no expectation – based purely on our own experience as human beings of planet Earth – that another race would be benign. In fact, we would have to anticipate the worst. "A better approach might be to ascertain whether the 'alien' is hostile rather than 'evil': hostile to all humans, hostile to some humans, hostile to other life forms on our planet, etc. There are those who insist that this cannot be the case, that if they are hostile they would have wiped us out already. We have already addressed that argument above, but briefly: we can’t assume that they would act the way we have acted in our history. Their life expectancy, timelines and schedules might be extremely long compared to ours. Or extremely short. We simply don’t know and should not assume anything. "Hostility implies intent: that they 'intend' to destroy us somehow. They have not done so, the argument goes, so they must not be hostile. The problem with this argument is that we are assuming they would manifest their hostility by blowing something up, or attacking us the way we attack and invade our enemies. They might have been attacking us for centuries already, in ways that make sense to them and which further an agenda we can’t begin to imagine or understand. "What if they are attacking us through the manipulation of consciousness? That sounds far-fetched, but we have been doing that ourselves for a long time. It’s called psychological warfare, and includes propaganda, disinformation, misinformation, etc. including – again ironically – using the UFO Phenomenon as a means of distracting us from our own secret weapons systems. "Many contactees report communication with the 'alien' by means of telepathy. That automatically presents us with the possibility that human consciousness may be vulnerable to direct outside interference or manipulation by the 'alien.' "We are simply not trying hard enough to understand the 'alien'. "We must proceed on the assumption that the Phenomenon is dangerous to us (perhaps in ways we can’t imagine, and I can’t stress that enough) and proceed slowly and carefully."

Joe Murgia

26,027 просмотров • 18 дней назад

Is climate change the same as global warming? Not quite. The warming of Earth — or global warming — is just one factor that makes up a range of changes that are happening to our planet, which is climate change. And we're studying all of it:
1:16

Is climate change the same as global warming? Not quite. The warming of Earth — or global warming — is just one factor that makes up a range of changes that are happening to our planet, which is climate change. And we're studying all of it:

NASA

957,381 просмотров • 2 лет назад

"Every day, there's a new story breaking that we are now becoming the land of 10,000 stories of fraud. And this is a direct result of out-of-control government spending with no guardrails!" "The appetite for out-of-control government spending that the Democrats possess is as insane as you can imagine!" "Let's make sure we can save this country, not for us, but for our kids and for our grandkids. And that's really what's at stake, is a fiscally sane country that our kids and our grandkids can live and prosper in!"
1:38

"Every day, there's a new story breaking that we are now becoming the land of 10,000 stories of fraud. And this is a direct result of out-of-control government spending with no guardrails!" "The appetite for out-of-control government spending that the Democrats possess is as insane as you can imagine!" "Let's make sure we can save this country, not for us, but for our kids and for our grandkids. And that's really what's at stake, is a fiscally sane country that our kids and our grandkids can live and prosper in!"

Bridgett Fertig

24,238 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

The Apollonians may have just totally redeemed themselves "I would look at morality...particularly Judaic Christian morality as, as also being a kind of weapon" "Jews got it in the heads of their their masters that actually being good is being meek, being good is being weak" "Being evil is being strong. And so that morality itself is wills of power. Morality can be used as a weapon and so much of what is directed against the identitarian idea or or nationalism" "So morality in this way can be a weapon used against us and, and I think so many of the, the, the fundamental reasons why white people aren't dominating the entire planet as as we certainly can is because of this black cloud that has been hanging over us" "This notion that our history is bad, that, that when we were in power that was just awful and immoral and, and, and and so on." "We need to have a a consciousness of morality and and to start reforming A morality willfully that that is that is life affirming and that is race affirming."
2:58

The Apollonians may have just totally redeemed themselves "I would look at morality...particularly Judaic Christian morality as, as also being a kind of weapon" "Jews got it in the heads of their their masters that actually being good is being meek, being good is being weak" "Being evil is being strong. And so that morality itself is wills of power. Morality can be used as a weapon and so much of what is directed against the identitarian idea or or nationalism" "So morality in this way can be a weapon used against us and, and I think so many of the, the, the fundamental reasons why white people aren't dominating the entire planet as as we certainly can is because of this black cloud that has been hanging over us" "This notion that our history is bad, that, that when we were in power that was just awful and immoral and, and, and and so on." "We need to have a a consciousness of morality and and to start reforming A morality willfully that that is that is life affirming and that is race affirming."

Seethroughitall

40,057 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

The most likely interpretation of angelic "trumpets" in biblical prophecy would be tones created by Galactic Federation motherships, or something similar as described here. I don't know the reason why this is happening, but I know that if it's happening, Elder Ikai has a reason. ------- #NEIOH - "The Noise Being Heard Is Not A Mothership As We Control The Outgoing Tones, But It Is The Activation Of Many Areas Of Industry That Are Interacting With The Frequencies Of A Group Of Motherships! If They Could Only Understand That Our Presence In Any Location Is With Peace And Perseverance Of Activity That Will Serve Humanity. Other Locations Are Being Activated As We Increase The Numbers Of Our Crafts. Continue To Observe As We Move Towards The Shift."
3:42

The most likely interpretation of angelic "trumpets" in biblical prophecy would be tones created by Galactic Federation motherships, or something similar as described here. I don't know the reason why this is happening, but I know that if it's happening, Elder Ikai has a reason. ------- #NEIOH - "The Noise Being Heard Is Not A Mothership As We Control The Outgoing Tones, But It Is The Activation Of Many Areas Of Industry That Are Interacting With The Frequencies Of A Group Of Motherships! If They Could Only Understand That Our Presence In Any Location Is With Peace And Perseverance Of Activity That Will Serve Humanity. Other Locations Are Being Activated As We Increase The Numbers Of Our Crafts. Continue To Observe As We Move Towards The Shift."

Kab

30,971 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

BASH: The big difference here, as you know, is that this is a broadcast network that was threatened by a government individual who has oversight over their regulation and potential for mergers MARKWAYNE MULLIN: Sure, but this is also a network that has not been friendly to this administration whatsoever
1:46

BASH: The big difference here, as you know, is that this is a broadcast network that was threatened by a government individual who has oversight over their regulation and potential for mergers MARKWAYNE MULLIN: Sure, but this is also a network that has not been friendly to this administration whatsoever

Aaron Rupar

139,011 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Only men do not want to agree to that. "I think that the United States needs to be more like China because China is the safest country I have ever been to in my entire life, and it is because of the amount of surveillance that they have. Everybody always likes to talk about how China is so scary because of their surveillance. No, that is literally why it is so safe. That is why I can travel here as a woman by myself. I've been to over 50 countries, and I can confidently say that I feel more safe as a woman because of the security that is in place in this country.”
1:27

Only men do not want to agree to that. "I think that the United States needs to be more like China because China is the safest country I have ever been to in my entire life, and it is because of the amount of surveillance that they have. Everybody always likes to talk about how China is so scary because of their surveillance. No, that is literally why it is so safe. That is why I can travel here as a woman by myself. I've been to over 50 countries, and I can confidently say that I feel more safe as a woman because of the security that is in place in this country.”

Johannes Maria

32,840 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

The Christian kvetching over this clip is pathetic. Here is the full context. In the interview Spielberg is not calling for the abolition or subversion of Christianity or the Church. The film literally includes a cardinal, a nun quoting scripture, and believers wrestling with what alien life would mean for their faith. Spielberg's conclusion is not that Christianity is false, but that god would still have dominion over alien life just as he does over humanity. This is directly out of mainstream Catholic theology. His point is the opposite of what people are claiming. He is suggesting that the creator god shared by Jews and Christians rules the entire universe, and that aliens or other unexplained phenomena would ultimately fall under that god's authority and reinforce it. That is the psyop, not "Christianity is being destroyed/subverted." Jews are not trying to destroy Christianity. Enough of this insecurity and persecution complex. Even by arguing this it shows that you have no idea what is going on.
2:21

The Christian kvetching over this clip is pathetic. Here is the full context. In the interview Spielberg is not calling for the abolition or subversion of Christianity or the Church. The film literally includes a cardinal, a nun quoting scripture, and believers wrestling with what alien life would mean for their faith. Spielberg's conclusion is not that Christianity is false, but that god would still have dominion over alien life just as he does over humanity. This is directly out of mainstream Catholic theology. His point is the opposite of what people are claiming. He is suggesting that the creator god shared by Jews and Christians rules the entire universe, and that aliens or other unexplained phenomena would ultimately fall under that god's authority and reinforce it. That is the psyop, not "Christianity is being destroyed/subverted." Jews are not trying to destroy Christianity. Enough of this insecurity and persecution complex. Even by arguing this it shows that you have no idea what is going on.

NeedMoreAmalek

18,305 просмотров • 25 дней назад

JD Vance on Greenland: Greenland matters to American national security because our entire missile defense relies on security in the Arctic. If a foreign country launched a missile at the United States of America, we would need control over the Arctic in order to shoot that missile down. Our entire missile defense system depends on that Arctic security. The Chinese and the Russians and even the Danes who control Greenland want to control that facility and that land mass. That would make us weaker. That would make our country more endangered. It would mean that if the President were negotiating with a foreign leader, he would have less leverage because they could realistically threaten the sovereignty and territorial safety of the United States of America. We’re not going to let that happen.
0:57

JD Vance on Greenland: Greenland matters to American national security because our entire missile defense relies on security in the Arctic. If a foreign country launched a missile at the United States of America, we would need control over the Arctic in order to shoot that missile down. Our entire missile defense system depends on that Arctic security. The Chinese and the Russians and even the Danes who control Greenland want to control that facility and that land mass. That would make us weaker. That would make our country more endangered. It would mean that if the President were negotiating with a foreign leader, he would have less leverage because they could realistically threaten the sovereignty and territorial safety of the United States of America. We’re not going to let that happen.

Clash Report

42,338 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

#WATCH | Delhi | On India AI Impact Summit, Congress MP Shashi Tharoor says, "... These first couple of days have gone extremely well. There have been some glitches, but these things happen in a large event. What has been impressive is the attendance of Presidents, Prime Ministers, and world leaders, and they've come with a strong message of wanting to see a newly integrated world in AI development, where the impact upon society would be the Principle. Preoccupation in India has clearly led the drive in this area. As far as the French Rafale is concerned, parts of it are being manufactured in India, and that is a very important aspect of the deal because it is part of strengthening our defence, but also increasing our self-reliance in the defence sector... Defence is important for India not because we want to go to war, but because we don't want others to think that we are so weak that they can be tempted to go to war. It is a defensive defence literally, and I support the government on that."
1:28

#WATCH | Delhi | On India AI Impact Summit, Congress MP Shashi Tharoor says, "... These first couple of days have gone extremely well. There have been some glitches, but these things happen in a large event. What has been impressive is the attendance of Presidents, Prime Ministers, and world leaders, and they've come with a strong message of wanting to see a newly integrated world in AI development, where the impact upon society would be the Principle. Preoccupation in India has clearly led the drive in this area. As far as the French Rafale is concerned, parts of it are being manufactured in India, and that is a very important aspect of the deal because it is part of strengthening our defence, but also increasing our self-reliance in the defence sector... Defence is important for India not because we want to go to war, but because we don't want others to think that we are so weak that they can be tempted to go to war. It is a defensive defence literally, and I support the government on that."

ANI

225,073 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Kamala Harris: We cannot despair. We cannot despair. The nature of a democracy is such that I think there's a duality. On the one hand, there's an incredible strength when our democracy is intact. An incredible strength in what it does to protect the freedoms and rights of its people. Oh, there's great strength in that. And it is very fragile. It is only as strong as our willingness to fight for it. And so that's the moment we're in. And I say do not despair because in a democracy, as long as we can keep it, in our democracy the people, every individual has the power to make a decision about what this will be. And so let's not feel powerless. Because then we have been defeated. And that's not our character as the American people. We are not one to be defeated. We rise to a moment and we stand on broad shoulders of people who have fought this fight before for our country. And in many ways let us look at the challenge then that we are being presented and not be overwhelmed by it. The baton is now in our hands, to fight for, not against, but for this country we love.
2:12

Kamala Harris: We cannot despair. We cannot despair. The nature of a democracy is such that I think there's a duality. On the one hand, there's an incredible strength when our democracy is intact. An incredible strength in what it does to protect the freedoms and rights of its people. Oh, there's great strength in that. And it is very fragile. It is only as strong as our willingness to fight for it. And so that's the moment we're in. And I say do not despair because in a democracy, as long as we can keep it, in our democracy the people, every individual has the power to make a decision about what this will be. And so let's not feel powerless. Because then we have been defeated. And that's not our character as the American people. We are not one to be defeated. We rise to a moment and we stand on broad shoulders of people who have fought this fight before for our country. And in many ways let us look at the challenge then that we are being presented and not be overwhelmed by it. The baton is now in our hands, to fight for, not against, but for this country we love.

Acyn

343,172 просмотров • 1 год назад

Jorge Jesus on Cristiano: “I just said that Ronaldo is different from all the players in the world because of his status and the professionalism he has shown throughout his career. I have no doubt, and I said it today. 90% of the fans who attended the match came to see Cristiano. Cristiano is a global phenomenon. We in Portugal do not know how to appreciate this, and we do not have any understanding in Portugal of what Cristiano’s popularity means outside our country. As a Portuguese, I feel very proud, not only because I am coaching a great player, but also because he is an exceptional professional. As our friend here said, I believe that the vast majority of the fans who attended today were because of him. Now we have the final ahead of us, and I hope that the stadium will be full to support Al Nassr to achieve victory, and for Cristiano as well.”
1:20

Jorge Jesus on Cristiano: “I just said that Ronaldo is different from all the players in the world because of his status and the professionalism he has shown throughout his career. I have no doubt, and I said it today. 90% of the fans who attended the match came to see Cristiano. Cristiano is a global phenomenon. We in Portugal do not know how to appreciate this, and we do not have any understanding in Portugal of what Cristiano’s popularity means outside our country. As a Portuguese, I feel very proud, not only because I am coaching a great player, but also because he is an exceptional professional. As our friend here said, I believe that the vast majority of the fans who attended today were because of him. Now we have the final ahead of us, and I hope that the stadium will be full to support Al Nassr to achieve victory, and for Cristiano as well.”

Al Nassr Zone

38,891 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Gov. Spanberger: "In his farewell address, George Washington warned us about the possibility of 'cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men' rising to power. But he also encouraged us, all Americans, to unite in a common cause to move this nation forward. That is our charge once more, and that is what we are seeing across the country. It is deeply American and patriotic to do so, and it is how we ensure that the state of our union remains strong, not just this year, but for the next 250 years as well. Because we, the people, have the power to make change, the power to stand up for what is right, the power to demand more of our nation."
1:00

Gov. Spanberger: "In his farewell address, George Washington warned us about the possibility of 'cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men' rising to power. But he also encouraged us, all Americans, to unite in a common cause to move this nation forward. That is our charge once more, and that is what we are seeing across the country. It is deeply American and patriotic to do so, and it is how we ensure that the state of our union remains strong, not just this year, but for the next 250 years as well. Because we, the people, have the power to make change, the power to stand up for what is right, the power to demand more of our nation."

The Bulwark

56,334 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Jonathan Caplan KC on UFO's: "The UFO Phenomena is a very real. Some are interdimensional & others extraterrestrial aliens. The truth is the US & China both don't fully understand that is why we have not had disclosure" The Barrister & UFO researcher appeared on GB News to discuss compelling evidence of alien life on Earth and what their agenda might be for visiting our planet. With five decades of research behind him, including conversations with confidential sources, Caplan concludes that the evidence is undeniable, as explored in his new book 'Not for Disclosure'. He points to serious conversations now taking place in US Congress about these phenomena, which may originate from dimensions beyond our current comprehension. As more details emerge from official channels and whistleblowers, the topic is shifting from speculation to a matter of global importance that could redefine our understanding of the universe and our place within it.
3:49

Jonathan Caplan KC on UFO's: "The UFO Phenomena is a very real. Some are interdimensional & others extraterrestrial aliens. The truth is the US & China both don't fully understand that is why we have not had disclosure" The Barrister & UFO researcher appeared on GB News to discuss compelling evidence of alien life on Earth and what their agenda might be for visiting our planet. With five decades of research behind him, including conversations with confidential sources, Caplan concludes that the evidence is undeniable, as explored in his new book 'Not for Disclosure'. He points to serious conversations now taking place in US Congress about these phenomena, which may originate from dimensions beyond our current comprehension. As more details emerge from official channels and whistleblowers, the topic is shifting from speculation to a matter of global importance that could redefine our understanding of the universe and our place within it.

Interstellar

33,995 просмотров • 17 дней назад

8) "Our stance is, for illegals, we're not gonna step in front of that. That's not our fight," argued Original Black Panther Party General Mike Pain. "That has nothing to do with us." "As far as our other brown folks and stuff like that, we do stand up and defend the citizens and the poor, and stuff like that, but as far as illegal immigration, that's not our fight."
0:53

8) "Our stance is, for illegals, we're not gonna step in front of that. That's not our fight," argued Original Black Panther Party General Mike Pain. "That has nothing to do with us." "As far as our other brown folks and stuff like that, we do stand up and defend the citizens and the poor, and stuff like that, but as far as illegal immigration, that's not our fight."

Ford Fischer

2,696,255 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

"We are not merely discussing a treaty; we are discussing the lifeline of more than 240 million people of Pakistan. When we identify ourselves as Pakistanis, we ask the question: who are we? If you go back into history, the Indus Valley Civilization defines us as people, whenever I go abroad, I often tell my counterparts that we are the people of the Indus Valley Civilization. Our identity is that we are people whose lives have been shaped on the banks of the mighty River Indus. As they say, water is life, and the Indus has given life to Pakistan. So, when we say that the Indus is our lifeline and that the 240 million people of Pakistan have an inalienable right to its waters, we mean it from the core of our hearts. For Pakistan, as I said, water is not simply a resource; it is a matter of life itself. This river system has, for thousands of years, nurtured one of the world's oldest civilizations. From the towering peaks of Pakistan to the fertile plains of Punjab and Sindh, these waters have connected our people across geography and history." #IndusWatersTreaty
1:11

"We are not merely discussing a treaty; we are discussing the lifeline of more than 240 million people of Pakistan. When we identify ourselves as Pakistanis, we ask the question: who are we? If you go back into history, the Indus Valley Civilization defines us as people, whenever I go abroad, I often tell my counterparts that we are the people of the Indus Valley Civilization. Our identity is that we are people whose lives have been shaped on the banks of the mighty River Indus. As they say, water is life, and the Indus has given life to Pakistan. So, when we say that the Indus is our lifeline and that the 240 million people of Pakistan have an inalienable right to its waters, we mean it from the core of our hearts. For Pakistan, as I said, water is not simply a resource; it is a matter of life itself. This river system has, for thousands of years, nurtured one of the world's oldest civilizations. From the towering peaks of Pakistan to the fertile plains of Punjab and Sindh, these waters have connected our people across geography and history." #IndusWatersTreaty

Ministry of Information & Broadcasting

59,576 просмотров • 4 дней назад