正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

The Supreme Court has INFURIATED the Left with the SHADOW DOCKET — unsigned emergency orders, no oral arguments, no months of delay — to SLAP DOWN activist judges and let the administration KEEP MOVING instead of trapping it in legal limbo for months or even years. Jonathan Turley: “For... show more

RedWave Press

246,646 subscribers

41,644 次观看 • 3 天前 •via X (Twitter)

喜剧新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Bonta: They always believed that if they went to the U.S. Supreme Court—especially on the emergency docket—they would prevail. But the order today—the ruling today—could not have been more favorable for the states, for Illinois, and for the 23 Democratic states that supported their position. It was a complete rejection—a slapdown—a complete failure to accept any of the arguments from the Trump administration, because those arguments are not acceptable.

Bonta: They always believed that if they went to the U.S. Supreme Court—especially on the emergency docket—they would prevail. But the order today—the ruling today—could not have been more favorable for the states, for Illinois, and for the 23 Democratic states that supported their position. It was a complete rejection—a slapdown—a complete failure to accept any of the arguments from the Trump administration, because those arguments are not acceptable.

Acyn

84,308 次观看 • 8 个月前

Psaki: The Trump administration asked the supreme court to immediately pause a federal judge's ruling that required the administration to fully fund snap for the month of November. And we just got word from the supreme court that they have granted the request

Psaki: The Trump administration asked the supreme court to immediately pause a federal judge's ruling that required the administration to fully fund snap for the month of November. And we just got word from the supreme court that they have granted the request

Acyn

370,060 次观看 • 9 个月前

"Maybe we just pass a law that if a judge has their ruling overturned by the Supreme Court, they forfeit their position and their law license... because they got it wrong." Carl Higbie explains the need to rein in rogue judges that interfere with the Trump administration's goals.

"Maybe we just pass a law that if a judge has their ruling overturned by the Supreme Court, they forfeit their position and their law license... because they got it wrong." Carl Higbie explains the need to rein in rogue judges that interfere with the Trump administration's goals.

NEWSMAX

167,496 次观看 • 2 个月前

🇺🇸 SUPREME COURT COULD SLAP DOWN BIDEN’S AUTOPEN PARDONS Everyone wants to know the same thing: can Biden really pardon people for crimes they haven’t been charged with? A DOJ veteran says Biden’s blanket pardons, like the one for Fauci, look more like “get out of jail free” cards than real legal acts. And because they skip over actual crimes, they’re wide open to being overturned by the Supreme Court. Biden didn’t even sign them himself. He used an autopen. For high-ranking allies. Crimeless pardons are shaky because the Constitution ties pardons to actual offenses. Without charges or convictions, there's no legal anchor. Just a preemptive favor that could collapse in court. And it probably will. Source: Catherine Herridge

🇺🇸 SUPREME COURT COULD SLAP DOWN BIDEN’S AUTOPEN PARDONS Everyone wants to know the same thing: can Biden really pardon people for crimes they haven’t been charged with? A DOJ veteran says Biden’s blanket pardons, like the one for Fauci, look more like “get out of jail free” cards than real legal acts. And because they skip over actual crimes, they’re wide open to being overturned by the Supreme Court. Biden didn’t even sign them himself. He used an autopen. For high-ranking allies. Crimeless pardons are shaky because the Constitution ties pardons to actual offenses. Without charges or convictions, there's no legal anchor. Just a preemptive favor that could collapse in court. And it probably will. Source: Catherine Herridge

Mario Nawfal

105,689 次观看 • 8 个月前

🚨 JUST IN: Legal expert Jonathan Turley GOES OFF on Democrats for considering *firing* the entire Virginia Supreme Court to reinstate the 10D-1R gerrymander map "They will pack SCOTUS AS WELL if they take power!" "Hakeem Jeffries is very unpopular...but hopes to be the next Speaker. But to do that, he's got to engineer a MAJORITY." "He's watching that evaporate across the country!" "It captures the fact that now many on the left are saying that we will win by any means necessary." "The public needs to understand that many of these same voices have been saying publicly that they will pack the Supreme Court as well. As soon as they take power, many Democratic pundits and politicians have said that they want to pack the Supreme Court to create an instant liberal majority." "It's the same mindset of by any means necessary. No institution, no value is truly sacred." 🫳🏻🎤 Jonathan Turley Bill Melugin

🚨 JUST IN: Legal expert Jonathan Turley GOES OFF on Democrats for considering firing the entire Virginia Supreme Court to reinstate the 10D-1R gerrymander map "They will pack SCOTUS AS WELL if they take power!" "Hakeem Jeffries is very unpopular...but hopes to be the next Speaker. But to do that, he's got to engineer a MAJORITY." "He's watching that evaporate across the country!" "It captures the fact that now many on the left are saying that we will win by any means necessary." "The public needs to understand that many of these same voices have been saying publicly that they will pack the Supreme Court as well. As soon as they take power, many Democratic pundits and politicians have said that they want to pack the Supreme Court to create an instant liberal majority." "It's the same mindset of by any means necessary. No institution, no value is truly sacred." 🫳🏻🎤 Jonathan Turley Bill Melugin

Eric Daugherty

214,406 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 WOW! President Trump says he could nominate TED CRUZ for the US Supreme Court "He's a BRILLIANT legal mind. If I nominated him for the US Supreme Court, I'd get 100% of the votes! The Dems will vote because they want him out [of the Senate], and Republicans will vote for him because they wanna get him the hell out too!" 🤣🤣

🚨 WOW! President Trump says he could nominate TED CRUZ for the US Supreme Court "He's a BRILLIANT legal mind. If I nominated him for the US Supreme Court, I'd get 100% of the votes! The Dems will vote because they want him out [of the Senate], and Republicans will vote for him because they wanna get him the hell out too!" 🤣🤣

Eric Daugherty

861,775 次观看 • 7 个月前

Why did the Wisconsin Supreme Court appoint two panels of hard-left Democrat judges to hear redistricting cases instead of just hearing them itself? Because the justices are afraid of being smacked down and embarrassed by the U.S. Supreme Court for the second time this year.

Why did the Wisconsin Supreme Court appoint two panels of hard-left Democrat judges to hear redistricting cases instead of just hearing them itself? Because the justices are afraid of being smacked down and embarrassed by the U.S. Supreme Court for the second time this year.

Dan O'Donnell

34,741 次观看 • 9 个月前

🚨 JUST IN: Legal expert Jonathan Turley is demanding Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts BRING IN THE FBI to FIND THE LEAKERS — who keep trying to harm conservatives on the Court YES! Go hard against the leakers! They just ran to the NYT. “For the future of the court and the faith of the public, Roberts has to set his reservations aside and bring in the FBI to find the culprit." "Most importantly, he has to guarantee total transparency in allowing the public to see the results wherever they may lead." Jonathan Turley

🚨 JUST IN: Legal expert Jonathan Turley is demanding Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts BRING IN THE FBI to FIND THE LEAKERS — who keep trying to harm conservatives on the Court YES! Go hard against the leakers! They just ran to the NYT. “For the future of the court and the faith of the public, Roberts has to set his reservations aside and bring in the FBI to find the culprit." "Most importantly, he has to guarantee total transparency in allowing the public to see the results wherever they may lead." Jonathan Turley

Eric Daugherty

361,816 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Stephen Miller goes NUCLEAR on the radical leftist judges who had to be slapped down by the Supreme Court when they tried to keep TPS Haitian migrants in America "We can FINALLY remove the Haitian illegal migrants — but this should have NEVER TAKEN 10 YEARS!" "It is OUTRAGEOUS that we have judges in this country who continue to supplant their own radical beliefs for the Democrats!" 🔥 "Rogue radical judges stymied that for 16 months. Here we are because of the Supreme court!" "Trump ENDED that benefit. The statute SAYS it is judicially unreviewable!" Stephen Miller

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Stephen Miller goes NUCLEAR on the radical leftist judges who had to be slapped down by the Supreme Court when they tried to keep TPS Haitian migrants in America "We can FINALLY remove the Haitian illegal migrants — but this should have NEVER TAKEN 10 YEARS!" "It is OUTRAGEOUS that we have judges in this country who continue to supplant their own radical beliefs for the Democrats!" 🔥 "Rogue radical judges stymied that for 16 months. Here we are because of the Supreme court!" "Trump ENDED that benefit. The statute SAYS it is judicially unreviewable!" Stephen Miller

Eric Daugherty

42,809 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨 SAME OBAMA JUDGE. SAME GAME. A federal judge in Boston just slammed the brakes AGAIN on Trump’s order to stop the Postal Service from mailing ballots to people who aren’t on a verified eligibility list. Last week SCOTUS told this exact judge she jumped the gun. So USPS issued the actual rule. She pulled the trigger again. Hearing Sept. 3. Jonathan Turley nailed it on Fox: This is why the Supreme Court uses the emergency docket. Activist judges issue an injunction, run out the clock, and by the time anyone can rule on the merits the ballots are already in the mail. Letitia James: “The President has no jurisdiction over elections.” Turley: He has jurisdiction over the POST OFFICE. These are FEDERAL elections. They’re not arguing the Constitution. They’re arguing the calendar. If Vegas is taking bets, the house is with the challengers — not because they’re right, but because time is the only weapon they have left. Watch the emergency docket. This one isn’t finished.

🚨 SAME OBAMA JUDGE. SAME GAME. A federal judge in Boston just slammed the brakes AGAIN on Trump’s order to stop the Postal Service from mailing ballots to people who aren’t on a verified eligibility list. Last week SCOTUS told this exact judge she jumped the gun. So USPS issued the actual rule. She pulled the trigger again. Hearing Sept. 3. Jonathan Turley nailed it on Fox: This is why the Supreme Court uses the emergency docket. Activist judges issue an injunction, run out the clock, and by the time anyone can rule on the merits the ballots are already in the mail. Letitia James: “The President has no jurisdiction over elections.” Turley: He has jurisdiction over the POST OFFICE. These are FEDERAL elections. They’re not arguing the Constitution. They’re arguing the calendar. If Vegas is taking bets, the house is with the challengers — not because they’re right, but because time is the only weapon they have left. Watch the emergency docket. This one isn’t finished.

Gunther Eagleman™

55,971 次观看 • 3 天前

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump just DEMANDED Senate Republicans nuke the 60-vote filibuster so the GOP can win the midterms and 2028. Or else the Democrats will do it and get to 21 Supreme Court justices. HE'S RIGHT. GET TO IT. "TERMINATE THE FILIBUSTER, AND HAVE THE MOST SUCCESSFUL FOUR YEARS IN THE HISTORY OF OUR COUNTRY, BY FAR, WITH NOT EVEN THE HINT OF A SHUTDOWN OF OUR GREAT NATION ON JANUARY 30TH!" "Eric Holder just gave a Speech where he emphatically stated, above all else, that Democrats will PACK the Supreme Court of the United States if they get the chance. The word is, he wants 21 Radical Left Activist Judges, not being satisfied with the heretofore 15 that they were seeking. It will be 21, they will destroy our Constitution, and there’s not a thing that the Republicans can do about it unless we TERMINATE THE FILIBUSTER, which will lead to an easy WIN of the Midterms, and an even easier WIN in the Presidential Election of 2028." "Why would the Republicans even think about giving them this opportunity? The American People don’t want gridlock, they want their Leaders to GET THINGS DONE"

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump just DEMANDED Senate Republicans nuke the 60-vote filibuster so the GOP can win the midterms and 2028. Or else the Democrats will do it and get to 21 Supreme Court justices. HE'S RIGHT. GET TO IT. "TERMINATE THE FILIBUSTER, AND HAVE THE MOST SUCCESSFUL FOUR YEARS IN THE HISTORY OF OUR COUNTRY, BY FAR, WITH NOT EVEN THE HINT OF A SHUTDOWN OF OUR GREAT NATION ON JANUARY 30TH!" "Eric Holder just gave a Speech where he emphatically stated, above all else, that Democrats will PACK the Supreme Court of the United States if they get the chance. The word is, he wants 21 Radical Left Activist Judges, not being satisfied with the heretofore 15 that they were seeking. It will be 21, they will destroy our Constitution, and there’s not a thing that the Republicans can do about it unless we TERMINATE THE FILIBUSTER, which will lead to an easy WIN of the Midterms, and an even easier WIN in the Presidential Election of 2028." "Why would the Republicans even think about giving them this opportunity? The American People don’t want gridlock, they want their Leaders to GET THINGS DONE"

Eric Daugherty

19,072 次观看 • 9 个月前

Litman: The irony of this just spillth over—because of course, the Biden administration was subject to nationwide injunction after nationwide injunction in cases that didn’t warrant it. And they repeatedly asked the Supreme Court, “Guys, can you do something about this?” The Republican justices declined to do so. And now, all of a sudden—five months into the Trump administration—they realize, “Oh, nationwide injunctions? Yeah, they’ve basically been legally suspect all along.” How convenient, sirs and madam. And it is just gross in its obvious hypocrisy.

Litman: The irony of this just spillth over—because of course, the Biden administration was subject to nationwide injunction after nationwide injunction in cases that didn’t warrant it. And they repeatedly asked the Supreme Court, “Guys, can you do something about this?” The Republican justices declined to do so. And now, all of a sudden—five months into the Trump administration—they realize, “Oh, nationwide injunctions? Yeah, they’ve basically been legally suspect all along.” How convenient, sirs and madam. And it is just gross in its obvious hypocrisy.

Acyn

115,879 次观看 • 1 年前

Activist judges are being thrown to the curb. According to the Supreme Court in a 6-3 ruling no judge can issue a nationwide injunction. That’s a power only the Supreme Court has. These judges have to stay in their own lane. They can no longer stop the Executive Branch decisions. Another major loss for over zealous Democrats trying to stop Trump from saving this country and doing what he promised to do during his campaign. We voted for Trump. The nation overwhelmingly voted for Trump. Democrat politicians are the biggest problem we have in this country. They don’t care what the people want.

Activist judges are being thrown to the curb. According to the Supreme Court in a 6-3 ruling no judge can issue a nationwide injunction. That’s a power only the Supreme Court has. These judges have to stay in their own lane. They can no longer stop the Executive Branch decisions. Another major loss for over zealous Democrats trying to stop Trump from saving this country and doing what he promised to do during his campaign. We voted for Trump. The nation overwhelmingly voted for Trump. Democrat politicians are the biggest problem we have in this country. They don’t care what the people want.

MAGA PATRIOT TGM (TERI)

419,789 次观看 • 10 个月前

The Supreme Court is allowing the Trump administration to move ahead with implementing key portions of an executive order that seeks to tighten the rules for mail voting ahead of November’s midterms. CBS News legal contributor Jessica Levinson explains the ruling and what impact it could have on the upcoming elections.

The Supreme Court is allowing the Trump administration to move ahead with implementing key portions of an executive order that seeks to tighten the rules for mail voting ahead of November’s midterms. CBS News legal contributor Jessica Levinson explains the ruling and what impact it could have on the upcoming elections.

CBS News

46,961 次观看 • 7 天前

Here’s Why the Era of Lawless Leftist Judges is Likely Ending Soon Former Deputy Assistant AG John Yoo: "The Supreme Court is already signaling that they are very sympathetic to the Trump administration... They've called, basically, a special session in order to hear president Trump's claims that there should not be unlimited nationwide injunctions... The key thing here is for the Supreme Court to put an end to these 675 trial judges who all think they can run foreign policy, spending and hiring throughout the federal government."

Here’s Why the Era of Lawless Leftist Judges is Likely Ending Soon Former Deputy Assistant AG John Yoo: "The Supreme Court is already signaling that they are very sympathetic to the Trump administration... They've called, basically, a special session in order to hear president Trump's claims that there should not be unlimited nationwide injunctions... The key thing here is for the Supreme Court to put an end to these 675 trial judges who all think they can run foreign policy, spending and hiring throughout the federal government."

Steve Gruber

223,308 次观看 • 1 年前