正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

The teddy bear is not evidence. It is a prop. Same man. Same stuffed animals arranged at his feet. Two different piles of rubble, two different burning buildings, one rehearsed pose. That is not how grief works. That is how a set works. Someone decided the Western eye needed...

26,332 次观看 • 3 天前 •via X (Twitter)

15 条评论

Karyn 的头像
Karyn3 天前

I look at these obviously staged atrocity videos and I feel nothing because my eyes, ears and every instinct I've been blessed with can tell that it's fake. It's empty & soulless. It performs "suffering" while being devoid of suffering.

Fred Krome 的头像
Fred Krome3 天前

"Drop the Dead Donkey" a Brtish TV show satirizing the news did a segment on a reporter who used a teddy bear as a prop when covering conflict zones. Best line: "this bear has visited more disaster sites than Margaret Thatcher."

Bz 的头像
Bz3 天前

More

Gina 的头像
Gina3 天前

Not even stuffed animals are spare the pally 💩 propaganda

TJM💚🤍💜🎗️🤍💙🤍📟 的头像
TJM💚🤍💜🎗️🤍💙🤍📟2 天前

@GAZAWOOD2 They have been doing the teddy bear thing since the start. Often both bear & person are immaculate. Ironically they stole children's toys from the kibbutz's. Which the IDF often found later. In their homes, especially in Rafah. Dreadful people. Just awful

Moe 🎗️ 🧢 的头像
Moe 🎗️ 🧢3 天前

All they have are lies.

O'Balti 的头像
O'Balti3 天前

@israellove48 Such a pathetic “people”

Mmallarys #Zionist 🇮🇱 #JusticeForMalkiRoth 的头像
Mmallarys #Zionist 🇮🇱 #JusticeForMalkiRoth3 天前

Hooray for #Pallywood 🎶🎶

TheRhetorician 的头像
TheRhetorician3 天前

You’ve been duped.

🇺🇸Sockpuppet🇺🇸🤔 的头像
🇺🇸Sockpuppet🇺🇸🤔2 天前

🤬🤬🤬🤬

H-rie 的头像
H-rie2 天前

@GAZAWOOD2

Agnes Domini 的头像
Agnes Domini2 天前

The toy in the rubble isn't damaged, but the building are, which suggests the toy was planted there after the destruction. Not even dust on it from the building rubble. GTFO.

Kabalie 🇳🇱✡️🎗 的头像
Kabalie 🇳🇱✡️🎗2 天前

@GAZAWOOD2

Foment Liberty 的头像
Foment Liberty2 天前

But look at him, he clearly hasn't eaten for weeks. He has to take work as an actor so he has access to the production company's craft services.

DavidAnderson_JD_NYC 的头像
DavidAnderson_JD_NYC2 天前

Do we have a NEW MR. FAFO in the house? We DO! We DO!🥳🎉 Fwee Pawsthtine! Wiver to See!🍉🇵🇸 Oh happy day! Our fundraising grift can go on, fire up that gofundme to fleece western useful idiots! Hollywood can relax WE HAVE A NEW MR. FAFO. D. (RIP original conman, much missed). @polphiloecon @sarahleah1 @JimmyJ4thewin

相关视频

your agent has thirty tools. it calls two of them. the other twenty eight are not sitting idle somewhere. they are in the request, every request, and they are doing damage in two places at once. first the obvious one. tool schemas go into the prompt, and a schema is not a name. it is a description, a parameter list, types, required fields, an example. thirty of those is a few thousand tokens that ship with every single call, including the ones where the agent just says thanks and stops. you are paying rent on twenty eight tools that have never fired. second, and this is the one that costs more. when the request says cancel the order, the model picks by matching against everything available. four of your tools are plausible: cancel_order, refund_order, update_order, void_order. it is choosing among them based on the descriptions you wrote, one afternoon, months ago. every tool you add is another candidate in that shortlist. the twenty eight you never call are not neutral. they are noise in the one decision that determines whether the run works. > why it grows without anyone deciding to nobody adds thirty tools on purpose. you add one for a task, it works, it stays. six months later the registry is a catalogue and no one has ever removed anything, because removing a tool feels risky and adding one feels free. and there is no feedback telling you otherwise. the unused ones never error. they never appear in a failing trace. they are invisible in exactly the way that lets them accumulate. > what to actually do count calls per tool over the last thousand runs. this is one group-by and it usually shocks people. the ones at zero are pure cost. ship the tools the task needs, not the whole registry. a research phase does not need deploy. a writing phase does not need the database. swap the set between phases instead of loading everything up front. same agent, different tools, depending on where the run is. and when two tools could both plausibly answer the same request, that is not redundancy you can ignore. it is a coin flip you built into the system. the twenty eight tools are not unused. they are used every time, by the part of the run you cannot see.

Hanako

24,656 次观看 • 1 个月前

Jordan Peterson on why imposter syndrome is not the problem you think it is: 1. feeling like an imposter is actually a marker of mental health and competence. the people who do not feel it are the narcissists. if you have any sense and you are not deluded about your abilities you will feel some version of this every time you level up. peterson says the absence of imposter syndrome should concern you more than its presence. 2. every time you move up you will feel like an imposter. that is not a flaw. it is accurate. when you first enter a new role you are a beginner. you do not know what you are doing yet. feeling like an imposter at that stage is not a sign of weakness. it is a sign that you have enough self awareness to recognize the gap between where you are and where you need to be. 3. admitting ignorance to competent people never goes badly. people are afraid to ask questions because they think they are the only one in the room who does not know. they are not. if you were paying attention and you had a question the probability that half the room had the same question is very high. you only have to ask a stupid question once. after that you are no longer stupid about it. 4. intellectual humility is endearing to people who are actually good at what they do. competent people are always asking questions too because they know how much they do not know. when they see you asking questions they do not think you are incompetent. they think you probably are competent. 5. there is a darker version of imposter syndrome called imposter adaptation. hedonic adaptation is where happiness resets after good things happen. imposter adaptation is where the feeling of being a fraud persists no matter how many times you disprove it. you keep succeeding. the feeling keeps returning. at some point you have to admit the feeling has nothing to do with your actual capacity and everything to do with an addiction to feeling like an imposter. 6. high neuroticism makes this significantly worse. neuroticism is sensitivity to threat and punishment. people high in this trait need more evidence to feel safe and competent. the calibration problem is nearly impossible. you wake up with an ache in your side. is it nothing or is it cancer. most of the time it is nothing. the neurotic brain cannot easily tell the difference and applies the same logic to professional competence. 7. the only treatment that actually works is voluntary exposure to the things you are afraid of. you keep facing challenges. you keep paying attention. you develop competence. the environment becomes more predictable. the evidence accumulates. the people around you build confidence in you and that confidence reflects back. there is no shortcut. that is the pathway.

Jaynit

54,881 次观看 • 3 个月前

Why This Dance Clip Grabs You Before You Think The feeling comes first. Not admiration. Not analysis. A small jolt in the body, as if the beat has already decided you are part of the room. That is the emotion this clip creates. It is not sadness and it is not nostalgia. It is the pleasure of being pulled in. Watch long enough and you stop judging the dancers. You start wanting the same release they have: to stop holding yourself in, to let the music use your shoulders, to stop performing competence and just move. People are drawn to that because modern life trains the opposite. We sit. We keep gestures small. We watch other lives through a screen and rarely enter them. A class like this offers the opposite contract. You do not need to be the best. You only need to join the pulse. Belonging without an interview. Strength without a speech. The pull is also honest. The dancers are not selling mystery. They are sweating, dropping their weight, repeating a phrase until it becomes shared. That repetition is comforting. The brain likes a pattern it can enter. Once the pattern is clear, the viewer’s body starts rehearsing it from the chair. Attraction begins there: not “they are impressive,” but “I recognize this and I want in.” There is vanity in it too, and there is no point pretending otherwise. People want to look alive. They want to feel desired by the moment itself. But underneath the vanity is something plainer. Humans are built to move together. A crowd in time feels safer than a crowd in chaos. That old fact still works on a phone screen. So the clip does not win because it explains dance. It wins because it wakes a hunger most people forget they have: to stop watching and be carried. Has a video ever made you restless in that same way—not impressed, just ready to stand up?

Emotion & Music

27,729 次观看 • 25 天前