Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

The term "misinformation" has been weaponised by the Labour Government. According to the Government, "misinformation" is a uniquely dangerous phenomenon that is being used to divide people, undermine democracy, and fuel hatred and violence. To deal with this scourge, ministers are drawing up a new regime of censorship on...

10,162 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

30 Kommentare

Profilbild von TheCynicalBrit 🇬🇧🦕
TheCynicalBrit 🇬🇧🦕vor 5 Tagen

From Covid to trans nonsense to immigration and net zero, the government consistently lies.

Profilbild von Martin James Seager
Martin James Seagervor 5 Tagen

We are literally into Orwell "Ministry of Truth" territory

Profilbild von Unfiltered Geordie
Unfiltered Geordievor 5 Tagen

Labour calling everything “misinformation” so they can shut it down. Same crowd that flooded the country then screams when people point it out. Free speech isn’t optional, it’s the lot they hate most.

Profilbild von Heather Gulliver
Heather Gullivervor 5 Tagen

The old accuse your enemies of what you do yourself with bells on it. We see your low life tricks government.

Profilbild von Aethelstan - but still Frank by name.....
Aethelstan - but still Frank by name.....vor 5 Tagen

50 people a week are already convicted of various "speech offences". Anyone else feeling we're getting a bit totalitarian?

Profilbild von Jim Smith
Jim Smithvor 5 Tagen

Free speech is the antidote to misinformation. It is the only way to enable finding the truth. What they are doing is replacing free speech with propaganda.

Profilbild von JonH🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿❤️🇮🇱🎗
JonH🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿❤️🇮🇱🎗vor 5 Tagen

The biggest source of misinformation is the current government itself. They lie constantly about virtually everything. From illegals to Israel, all lies and untruths. They are causing division in this country and they are doing it on purpose. Luckily, as an OAP I'll be dead soon.

Profilbild von Current Affairs
Current Affairsvor 5 Tagen

Would be good if they could learn the difference between "misinformation" and "disinformation" for starters.

Profilbild von Dr Goblin
Dr Goblinvor 5 Tagen

Would a decent camera being placed level and a mic be too much?

Profilbild von PaoloThomas💙🇮🇹🦊😸🐶🐹🐻🦉🦡🦔🐑🐖🐂🦘🦒🐎🐇🦏
PaoloThomas💙🇮🇹🦊😸🐶🐹🐻🦉🦡🦔🐑🐖🐂🦘🦒🐎🐇🦏vor 5 Tagen

@janduck97 Who funds the “free speech union” (sic)?

Profilbild von Jim Smith
Jim Smithvor 5 Tagen

There is only information in a democracy where people get to decide for themselves what is true. When the government decides it is propaganda.

Profilbild von tiana 🇬🇧 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
tiana 🇬🇧 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿vor 5 Tagen

The misinformation comes from the state, from unelected beaurocrats, down to the msm. We see you..

Profilbild von Florence Florence
Florence Florencevor 4 Tagen

@toadmeister This Labour regimes politicians are the most disgraceful mob this country has ever known. Nothing can beat this lot, they are sidelining the white indigenous folk. My opinion.

Profilbild von Aspals Legal
Aspals Legalvor 5 Tagen

Misinformation is something we are all guilty of from time to time. News papers and media particularly. When it is a deliberate false narrative, it becomes "disinformation". Does the government understand that?

Profilbild von Michael Derham
Michael Derhamvor 4 Tagen

There's no freedom of speech in Britain today.

Profilbild von Diana Durham
Diana Durhamvor 4 Tagen

FSU needs to point out that the Conservative government, including Olekemi, laid the foundations of online censorship that Labour are taking forward @SpeechUnion

Profilbild von Binra
Binravor 3 Tagen

A specific signature characteristic of the agenda of the lie is pre-emptive accusation of ITS sins in the Other. It tells you what it is doing, while baiting you into 'saving yourself' from false claims. Systemic corruption/big lies run a negative 'Economy' of monopolised hatred.

Profilbild von RoJo
RoJovor 4 Tagen

Sounds like "the science" a la covid... 👀

Profilbild von Compelling Talks
Compelling Talksvor 5 Tagen

“They lie to us, and they know they lie, and we know they know they lie. And yet they continue to lie.” Alexandra Solzhenitsyn in the his essay "Live Not by Lies".

Profilbild von Geoff Siddall
Geoff Siddallvor 4 Tagen

@toadmeister

Profilbild von DrGrumpy
DrGrumpyvor 5 Tagen

Or as Liebour like to call ‘misinformation’ their manifesto

Profilbild von Clive Pettigrew
Clive Pettigrewvor 5 Tagen

A government defining misinformation as uniquely dangerous is reassuringly neutral. The next step is clearly a statutory glossary, followed by an annual audit of the approved adjectives.

Profilbild von LondonUnity
LondonUnityvor 5 Tagen

The government is the biggest source of misinformation

Profilbild von Annoyed N' Angry
Annoyed N' Angryvor 5 Tagen

#Liebour The government of #Disinformation

Profilbild von Groiner
Groinervor 4 Tagen

Wrong. Its been weaponised by everyone who has a grudge. Usually the first ones to complain when it comes back to them

Profilbild von keith
keithvor 4 Tagen

Misinformation is being sold as untrue, vague, imprecise, subjective. Misinformation is opinions? Information meanwhile is normally associated with truth, fact, precise, objectivity? Information is therefore simply information. They want to block opinions? They've lost it...

Profilbild von Joe Lear
Joe Learvor 4 Tagen

Governments have issued official claims later shown to be inaccurate or overstated for years, from early Covid risk assessments to repeated mix-ups over immigration and net-zero costs. The sudden determination to police what the public says on the same subjects looks less like a defence of truth and more like a defence of the official line.

Profilbild von Werrall Doomed
Werrall Doomedvor 5 Tagen

Labour knows nothing about democracy.

Profilbild von Paul Smith
Paul Smithvor 5 Tagen

This should be fought and rejected every inch of the way!

Profilbild von Common-SensePolicies
Common-SensePoliciesvor 3 Tagen

A problem is that social media is full of foreign bots etc promoting hatred and division so to undermine the UK and partners. That isn't free speech.

Ähnliche Videos

"It's yet another thing the Government seems to be trying to do under our noses and think that we will not notice." The Government is spreading misinformation about misinformation in order to justify mass censorship on social media. The argument that mis- and disinformation is to blame for political division and unrest in society has been repeated so often that it has acquired the status of fact. Earlier this year, the Government released a green paper called Watch This Space proposing that social media platforms should be legally obliged to promote "trustworthy" news sources to the top of users' feeds. This is primarily public broadcasters like the BBC, ITV, and Channel 4. In other words, the Government wants to control the information you see. These proposals have been met with fierce opposition from the Trump administration and the senior US Congressman Jim Jordan, who chairs the House Judiciary Committee. If this did not sound dystopian enough already, FSU Policy and Research Director David Rose has written a report exposing how the Government has used dubious evidence to justify its call for mass censorship, whilst ignoring strong evidence which contradicts its claims. It is much easier to blame the likes of Elon Musk for the political division in society. Michelle O'Neill, the Sinn Féin First Minister of Northern Ireland, held Elon Musk responsible for the riots in Belfast that followed the video of a Sudanese migrant allegedly attempting to murder a local man by repeatedly knifing him. Keir Starmer also claimed there were people "trying to interfere in our democracy and seeking to stir up division on our streets". It seems that our political leaders fail to consider that perhaps the public are just witnessing events unfolding around them, rather than being maliciously fed misinformation? The FSU will not allow the Government to get away with this unnoticed. Watch FSU External Affairs Officer Connie Shaw on GB News 👇

The Free Speech Union

87,904 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

It's All Much Worse Than I Thought The corporate media are all-in on government censorship Over the last three years, we have come to learn of the role that our own government officials have played in demanding censorship by social media platforms. Some of this censorship was overt, particularly as it related to COVID. However, some of it was also done in secrecy, as we discovered in the Twitter Files. Many of us thought that once we had uncovered the censorship, governments would be sufficiently embarrassed to stop doing it. And to some extent, that has been the case. But now, governments around the world are stepping up their efforts to demand more censorship. Last week, the Federal Bureau of Investigation quietly announced it had resumed its outreach to social media companies. Scotland’s Police could even investigate comedians under a new hate speech law if someone complains about a joke. Major media outlets are currently working with government-funded censorship activists at the University of Washington and Stanford Internet Observatory to demand greater censorship in the name of “saving Democracy.” Without a doubt, those of us who have uncovered censorship have had an impact. On “60 Minutes” last Sunday, the government-funded advocates of censorship at the University of Washington said they have stopped demanding censorship of social media platforms. Simply drawing awareness to who is demanding censorship and who is funding them has weakened their power. But governments, government-funded NGOs, and the news media have been relentless in their demands for a crackdown on speech they deem hateful and false. At the Supreme Court last week, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson expressed unironic concern that the First Amendment restricts the government’s ability to censor. And everyone from the New Yorker to the New York Times to NBC is suggesting that the only people who are worried about government censorship are Trump supporters, which is obviously false. The 60 Minutes segment was particularly shocking. Lesly Stahl never mentioned the mass censorship of accurate information about COVID’S origins, COVID vaccines, and lockdowns. She falsely suggested that shining a light on the censorship activists was tantamount to persecution. And she suggested that if the government didn’t do more to censor misinformation, Trump supporters would overthrow the government, which is a form of disinformation aimed at scaring people into giving up our first and most fundamental freedom. There are many reasons why they are doing this....

Michael Shellenberger

21,897,944 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

YOU CAN'T GO BACK: [Michael Shellenberger] shakes his head in horror and disbelief as Senator Alex Antic explains the Labor Government and the Australian parliament are trying to push forward a bill that will create an "independent" body (government funded) to decide what the truth is. The misinformation and disinformation bill is being debated NOW. "if you were to allow the government, or the intelligence community, or some political party, or some group with an agenda to take control of those information channels, that's totalitarianism" Michael Shellenberger (CBR Chair of Politics, Censorship & Free Speech) "I think to really underscore how dangerous and scary the moment is, which is to remind people that [you] can't go back to this period of the printing press and print materials everybody gets their information in the same way, which is from a small number of internet platforms" "You can't go back to this period of the printing press and print materials everybody gets their information in the same way, which is from a small number of internet platforms and if you were to allow the government, or the intelligence community, or some political party, or some group with an agenda to take control of those information channels, that's totalitarianism, [that's] dictatorship...I'm not [gonna] sugarcoat it for people, that's very very disturbing [and] you just can't have a democracy, you can't solve problems, if you have people with an agenda, who are deciding what can and cannot be said online" "they call misinformation like the number one threat to democracy, it's the most Orwellian idea you know that allowing other people to share their point of view is a threat to democracy... no you're the threat to democracy...you think that there's too much free speech, you're the threat to democracy" "the people don't want censorship and yet these characters they're all demanding global control of information [and] I continue to be shocked by it. Sometimes, even when I have a victory like Ireland, you get like one week to celebrate and the next thing, you know Australia's on the verge [of] basically [the] government controlling the social media companies [and] it's very concerning" The Labor Government used the US election as an opportunity to stop all other parliamentary debate, to push through the disinformation bill will less media scrutiny, because they knew the ABC (who would have televised the Parliamentary broadcast) media was pre-occupied with the American election. Putting the Draconian Misinformation bill aside, the way they proceeded with the debate ALL NIGHT during the elections, in itself, is just plain sneaky

Humanspective

490,688 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr