Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

The trolley problem is a classic example in experimental philosophy: a trolley is barreling down the tracks toward three of your biological children. You can pull a lever to divert it toward five random strangers instead. Strict utilitarian logic would say you should sacrifice your three children to save... five strangers. But that’s not what most people choose, even though three is smaller than five. Gad Saad argues that this kind of moral calculus is normal for humanity. But today, he says, modern social movements often demand a form of empathy that asks people to suppress evolutionary instincts, deny obvious truths, and prioritize the feelings of a small minority over the rights and realities of the broader population. “I wish to live in a world where trans people’s rights are perfectly honored and everybody should live free of institutional bigotry… In that sense, I’m very much of a social liberal. That doesn’t mean that in the service of that goal, I murder truth and reality.”show more

The Free Press

886,757 subscribers

29,189 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Education News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨ELON MUSK: "I thought Marxism was a dead philosophy but its alive and well in our educational institutions. Part of it is that you have a lot of colleges with these giant endowments that insulate them from reality. So you can have this fake Communist Utopia at a university because they don't have any feedback loop to reality because they have these giant endowments (and government funding too), so that allows them to be disconnected from the realities of the free market. They take advantage of the free market, but they live in a pseudo communist world. How often do we need to run the Communism experiment? It should be very obvious that the economic philosophy that is the good one is the one that does not need to build walls to keep people IN. North Korea builds walls to keep people in. East Germany had to build walls to keep people from going to West Germany. The philosophy that has to build walls to keep people in, is the bad one. And yet you see a resurgence of it, over and over again."

🚨ELON MUSK: "I thought Marxism was a dead philosophy but its alive and well in our educational institutions. Part of it is that you have a lot of colleges with these giant endowments that insulate them from reality. So you can have this fake Communist Utopia at a university because they don't have any feedback loop to reality because they have these giant endowments (and government funding too), so that allows them to be disconnected from the realities of the free market. They take advantage of the free market, but they live in a pseudo communist world. How often do we need to run the Communism experiment? It should be very obvious that the economic philosophy that is the good one is the one that does not need to build walls to keep people IN. North Korea builds walls to keep people in. East Germany had to build walls to keep people from going to West Germany. The philosophy that has to build walls to keep people in, is the bad one. And yet you see a resurgence of it, over and over again."

Autism Capital 🧩

11,140,965 views • 1 year ago

AOC: “I understand that VP Vance believes shooting a young mother of three in the face three times is an acceptable America that he wants to live in, and I do not. That is a fundamental difference between VP Vance and I. I do not believe the American people should be assassinated in the street.”

AOC: “I understand that VP Vance believes shooting a young mother of three in the face three times is an acceptable America that he wants to live in, and I do not. That is a fundamental difference between VP Vance and I. I do not believe the American people should be assassinated in the street.”

Marco Foster

5,354,182 views • 6 months ago

AOC on Friday morning: “I understand that Vice President Vance believes that shooting a young mother of three in the face three times is an acceptable America that he wants to live in and I do not.” “And that is a fundamental difference between Vice President Vance and I, I do not believe that the American people should be assassinated in the street.”

AOC on Friday morning: “I understand that Vice President Vance believes that shooting a young mother of three in the face three times is an acceptable America that he wants to live in and I do not.” “And that is a fundamental difference between Vice President Vance and I, I do not believe that the American people should be assassinated in the street.”

Fox News

311,734 views • 6 months ago

Allow me to address the Israeli people. Your government wants you to believe that the whole world is conspiring against you, that the Palestinian people are terrorists, that the UN is filled with terrorist and terrorist supporters, that your closest allies are your enemies. This most radical Israeli government and its Foreign Minister are calling for “de radicalization” of the Palestinian society as a whole, calling them “human animals” and “children of darkness”. They want you to believe that your survival depends on your ability to continuously wage wars, including against a defenseless civilian population half of whom are children, on their erasure. The Israeli people need to decide if this is what they want their government and military doing. These atrocities that the whole world is watching and that your government is hoping you will filter out, deny or justify. In the midst of this genocide we are telling you: we choose peace and appeal to you to do the same. We do it for our children and our people. You should do it for your children and your loved ones. Enough bloodshed. Enough wars. Enough suffering. If not for the Palestinian people’s sake, for your own, if not in the name of humanity, in the name of self-preservation. The solution is ending this illegal occupation and ending this disastrous conflict; it is the realization of the independence and sovereignty of the Palestinian state, not its destruction; it is the fulfillment of our rights, not their continued denial; it is respect for international law, not its trampling; it is the implementation of the two-State solution, not a one state reality with Palestinians condemned to genocide, ethnic cleansing or apartheid.

Allow me to address the Israeli people. Your government wants you to believe that the whole world is conspiring against you, that the Palestinian people are terrorists, that the UN is filled with terrorist and terrorist supporters, that your closest allies are your enemies. This most radical Israeli government and its Foreign Minister are calling for “de radicalization” of the Palestinian society as a whole, calling them “human animals” and “children of darkness”. They want you to believe that your survival depends on your ability to continuously wage wars, including against a defenseless civilian population half of whom are children, on their erasure. The Israeli people need to decide if this is what they want their government and military doing. These atrocities that the whole world is watching and that your government is hoping you will filter out, deny or justify. In the midst of this genocide we are telling you: we choose peace and appeal to you to do the same. We do it for our children and our people. You should do it for your children and your loved ones. Enough bloodshed. Enough wars. Enough suffering. If not for the Palestinian people’s sake, for your own, if not in the name of humanity, in the name of self-preservation. The solution is ending this illegal occupation and ending this disastrous conflict; it is the realization of the independence and sovereignty of the Palestinian state, not its destruction; it is the fulfillment of our rights, not their continued denial; it is respect for international law, not its trampling; it is the implementation of the two-State solution, not a one state reality with Palestinians condemned to genocide, ethnic cleansing or apartheid.

State of Palestine

67,216 views • 11 months ago

EVERY MINUTE of this incredible monologue from Chris Stigall in a MUST WATCH. His reaction to the news of the deaths of three American service members in Operation Epic Fury is a gut-punch. “Most of us don’t really understand the reality of the hell that they live in combat.” “Does that mean righteous people do nothing because the outcome is unpredictable? I say CERTAINLY NOT!”

EVERY MINUTE of this incredible monologue from Chris Stigall in a MUST WATCH. His reaction to the news of the deaths of three American service members in Operation Epic Fury is a gut-punch. “Most of us don’t really understand the reality of the hell that they live in combat.” “Does that mean righteous people do nothing because the outcome is unpredictable? I say CERTAINLY NOT!”

Townhall.com

27,368 views • 4 months ago

☝️“In one of the US laws that explicitly mentions Russia, the stated goal is to "democratize" the Russian Federation. Can you imagine us setting a goal in our own domestic legislation to "democratize" the United States? You know, that is at least impolite. But in principle, we could do it, and there are reasons for that. Everyone is well aware that twice in US history, a president has come to power who was elected by a majority of electors but had a minority of voters behind him. Is that democratic? No. Democracy is the power of the people, the power of the majority. How is it possible that a person is elected to the highest office in the state by a minority of voters? There is such a problem in the US Constitution. But we are not demanding that you change your Constitution, are we?” - President Putin.

☝️“In one of the US laws that explicitly mentions Russia, the stated goal is to "democratize" the Russian Federation. Can you imagine us setting a goal in our own domestic legislation to "democratize" the United States? You know, that is at least impolite. But in principle, we could do it, and there are reasons for that. Everyone is well aware that twice in US history, a president has come to power who was elected by a majority of electors but had a minority of voters behind him. Is that democratic? No. Democracy is the power of the people, the power of the majority. How is it possible that a person is elected to the highest office in the state by a minority of voters? There is such a problem in the US Constitution. But we are not demanding that you change your Constitution, are we?” - President Putin.

🇷🇺Russia is not Enemy

249,262 views • 9 months ago

It is the darkest irony of our time that to be a good person—or a good, progressive nation—you must support and celebrate modern medicine’s most atrocious crime. The international response to dealing with this scandal right now is chaotic, but the solution is actually very simple: Restore reality. Defend the right of children to a childhood grounded in truth and the right of all young people to grow up healthy and whole. Stop bombarding young people with an incoherent, anti-reality political ideology, and start protecting them from it instead. Reject prioritizing the desires of extremist activists over the safeguarding of children. And face the reality that trans kids do not exist. What does exist are children and adolescents trying to make sense of themselves in a world that has abandoned reason in favour of ideology—young people being lied to at a crucial stage of identity development, who face consequences that will haunt them for a lifetime. My talk at the EU Parliament last month.

It is the darkest irony of our time that to be a good person—or a good, progressive nation—you must support and celebrate modern medicine’s most atrocious crime. The international response to dealing with this scandal right now is chaotic, but the solution is actually very simple: Restore reality. Defend the right of children to a childhood grounded in truth and the right of all young people to grow up healthy and whole. Stop bombarding young people with an incoherent, anti-reality political ideology, and start protecting them from it instead. Reject prioritizing the desires of extremist activists over the safeguarding of children. And face the reality that trans kids do not exist. What does exist are children and adolescents trying to make sense of themselves in a world that has abandoned reason in favour of ideology—young people being lied to at a crucial stage of identity development, who face consequences that will haunt them for a lifetime. My talk at the EU Parliament last month.

Mia Hughes

41,483 views • 7 months ago

WILD TAKE: Bill Maher on the Supreme Court Striking Down Parts of the Voting Rights Act: “We’ve heard a lot of talk about a civil war. This is like a step toward that. I saw the map. The picture of the map of what it’s going to look like. There’s going to be no black congress people from the South.” “You think you can cut off the part of the country that has the most African Americans in it, and that map is completely red… and you think people are just going to take that lying down.” Bret Stephens: “What I think you’re actually going to have is you’re going to have black representation, but a lot more of it is going to be Republican.”

WILD TAKE: Bill Maher on the Supreme Court Striking Down Parts of the Voting Rights Act: “We’ve heard a lot of talk about a civil war. This is like a step toward that. I saw the map. The picture of the map of what it’s going to look like. There’s going to be no black congress people from the South.” “You think you can cut off the part of the country that has the most African Americans in it, and that map is completely red… and you think people are just going to take that lying down.” Bret Stephens: “What I think you’re actually going to have is you’re going to have black representation, but a lot more of it is going to be Republican.”

RedWave Press

864,120 views • 2 months ago

From THE GOD DEBATE: Me: Why should you care for the needy? Why should you donate blood? Why should you refrain from murder and robbery? You can't possibly say that the only reason to do it is because God will punish you in an afterlife. If God's back was turned, does that mean it would be okay to kill and rob or let people drown or starve? I can think of plenty of secular reasons to do it. Namely, I would not want to be left to starve or drown or die of lack of blood. I would not want to be the victim of murder or robbery. There's nothing special about me, and therefore what I demand of everyone else, I have to accept for myself. It is clear that we would all be better off in a world where everyone helped each other and refrained from hurting each other compared to a society where everyone was a rapacious psychopath. That's why we should be moral. God has nothing to do with it. Ross Douthat (Ross Douthat): What happens in Dr. Pinker's argument is that as an heir of Jewish and Christian civilization, he imports, as this kind of commonsensical position, metaphysical propositions about the existence of these human rights that no one has ever seen of or heard of. He cannot show me a human right under a microscope. He cannot prove to me in a mathematical theorem why segregation was wrong, why it was wrong to murder people in the gulag or the concentration camp for the sake of a better tomorrow. He asserts that it's necessary for, again, sort of decency and order and so on, and often it is, but there has to be a stronger reason when you find yourself in a position where what the society says is out of joint with what you think are the fundamental truths about the universe.

From THE GOD DEBATE: Me: Why should you care for the needy? Why should you donate blood? Why should you refrain from murder and robbery? You can't possibly say that the only reason to do it is because God will punish you in an afterlife. If God's back was turned, does that mean it would be okay to kill and rob or let people drown or starve? I can think of plenty of secular reasons to do it. Namely, I would not want to be left to starve or drown or die of lack of blood. I would not want to be the victim of murder or robbery. There's nothing special about me, and therefore what I demand of everyone else, I have to accept for myself. It is clear that we would all be better off in a world where everyone helped each other and refrained from hurting each other compared to a society where everyone was a rapacious psychopath. That's why we should be moral. God has nothing to do with it. Ross Douthat (Ross Douthat): What happens in Dr. Pinker's argument is that as an heir of Jewish and Christian civilization, he imports, as this kind of commonsensical position, metaphysical propositions about the existence of these human rights that no one has ever seen of or heard of. He cannot show me a human right under a microscope. He cannot prove to me in a mathematical theorem why segregation was wrong, why it was wrong to murder people in the gulag or the concentration camp for the sake of a better tomorrow. He asserts that it's necessary for, again, sort of decency and order and so on, and often it is, but there has to be a stronger reason when you find yourself in a position where what the society says is out of joint with what you think are the fundamental truths about the universe.

Steven Pinker

79,917 views • 4 months ago

I was not always a mother who knew. In fact, I remember bristling at this part of Sis. Beck's talk. I was a young mother of three small, busy boys, and the last thing I wanted to be told was that my role in the grand plan of happiness was to do dishes and laundry. If I only knew then what I know now. What I know now is how truly important it is for a mother to be home with her children. That the "mundane" tasks of motherhood actually refine a woman. That serving your family only increases your love for them. That there is nothing more beneficial for your children than cultivating and creating a home where they are safe, loved and taught the principles of the gospel. That what the world offers is only a distraction from what's most important. I'd love to say that I'm now perfect at doing the dishes, the laundry and keeping my home. I am not. But I no longer feel like those tasks are a burden. I see them as a meaningful and important contribution to the most important thing in all of time and eternity...my family.

I was not always a mother who knew. In fact, I remember bristling at this part of Sis. Beck's talk. I was a young mother of three small, busy boys, and the last thing I wanted to be told was that my role in the grand plan of happiness was to do dishes and laundry. If I only knew then what I know now. What I know now is how truly important it is for a mother to be home with her children. That the "mundane" tasks of motherhood actually refine a woman. That serving your family only increases your love for them. That there is nothing more beneficial for your children than cultivating and creating a home where they are safe, loved and taught the principles of the gospel. That what the world offers is only a distraction from what's most important. I'd love to say that I'm now perfect at doing the dishes, the laundry and keeping my home. I am not. But I no longer feel like those tasks are a burden. I see them as a meaningful and important contribution to the most important thing in all of time and eternity...my family.

In Defense of Family | Megan

16,557 views • 5 months ago

Friends, in our first reading from the book of Deuteronomy this week, Moses says to the people, “For this command that I enjoin on you today is not too mysterious and remote for you. . . . No, it is something very near to you, already in your mouths and in your hearts; you have only to carry it out.” This is a master text for what we call in the Catholic tradition “the natural law.” It means that there is within us a kind of deep moral intuition by which we know the right thing to do; there are intuitions of value that give us a sense of meaning, purpose, and direction in life.

Friends, in our first reading from the book of Deuteronomy this week, Moses says to the people, “For this command that I enjoin on you today is not too mysterious and remote for you. . . . No, it is something very near to you, already in your mouths and in your hearts; you have only to carry it out.” This is a master text for what we call in the Catholic tradition “the natural law.” It means that there is within us a kind of deep moral intuition by which we know the right thing to do; there are intuitions of value that give us a sense of meaning, purpose, and direction in life.

Bishop Robert Barron

28,866 views • 1 year ago

In 1776 there was 1 Constitutional Republic in the world, 2-7 Republics - most of which were small aristocracies, 1 Constitution, England had a Bill of Rights, and a few other countries with decent legal frameworks. Today there are 159 Republics in the world, over 190 of them have Constitutions, & over 190 have a Bill Of Rights. This is the result of 1776, which not only lit the fire of liberty in the hearts of Americans, but in people all over the world - a world which eagerly followed America. There is an agenda to separate the American nation from its roots, and those in power are doing that by teaching school children that the founding fathers were “oppressors,” but with historical context, it is undeniable that in reality, they were the greatest champions of liberty in human history. Also shout out to the Iroquois, and the great law of peace - which served as a constitution, but was not written down.

In 1776 there was 1 Constitutional Republic in the world, 2-7 Republics - most of which were small aristocracies, 1 Constitution, England had a Bill of Rights, and a few other countries with decent legal frameworks. Today there are 159 Republics in the world, over 190 of them have Constitutions, & over 190 have a Bill Of Rights. This is the result of 1776, which not only lit the fire of liberty in the hearts of Americans, but in people all over the world - a world which eagerly followed America. There is an agenda to separate the American nation from its roots, and those in power are doing that by teaching school children that the founding fathers were “oppressors,” but with historical context, it is undeniable that in reality, they were the greatest champions of liberty in human history. Also shout out to the Iroquois, and the great law of peace - which served as a constitution, but was not written down.

Brett Pike

48,946 views • 7 months ago

Bill Gates says giving your entire fortune to your children isn't doing them a favor “It's pretty insane this is a world where somebody can have over $100,000,000,000” “You don't want to just give that to children and create some dynasty. That's not even a favor to them. You want to give that back” “Philanthropy can have these outsized results in terms of lives saved almost like a great startup does on the side of innovation, so getting those minds to turn those capacities to equity to the poorest people” “I feel that we've got the golden rule, we're supposed to care about people. There are times when it feels like sympathy for poor people outside the country is lower today than it's been but I know that'll come back around because the moral logic there I think is very very strong” “I found it so fulfilling. I created a group called Giving Pledge of people who've committed to give the majority of their wealth away and we learn from each other, hopefully we inspire each other and hopefully we change the societal expectations that if you have even a modest fortune most of it should combine with your talents and make the world a bit more of a fair place”

Bill Gates says giving your entire fortune to your children isn't doing them a favor “It's pretty insane this is a world where somebody can have over $100,000,000,000” “You don't want to just give that to children and create some dynasty. That's not even a favor to them. You want to give that back” “Philanthropy can have these outsized results in terms of lives saved almost like a great startup does on the side of innovation, so getting those minds to turn those capacities to equity to the poorest people” “I feel that we've got the golden rule, we're supposed to care about people. There are times when it feels like sympathy for poor people outside the country is lower today than it's been but I know that'll come back around because the moral logic there I think is very very strong” “I found it so fulfilling. I created a group called Giving Pledge of people who've committed to give the majority of their wealth away and we learn from each other, hopefully we inspire each other and hopefully we change the societal expectations that if you have even a modest fortune most of it should combine with your talents and make the world a bit more of a fair place”

Jack

61,858 views • 1 month ago

Every time I hear the debate between English identity and multiculturalism, I’m deeply confused. Multiculturalism essentially means that “Englishness” is an empty vessel in which cultures live together, that the vessel of being a country is neutral and empty of content. There’s been an elite project in Britain, America and Canada and generally in the English speaking world, to empty identity of distinctiveness and culture and into that empty vessel, pour any old random thing. Literally any old idea unexamined. And so you now have in Britain, a very small minority of radical islamists. They are tiny. Most muslims are not radical. They are tiny, and yet they can run your streets because everybody else is an empty vessel. You look at that idea and you say that’s not me, that’s not us, and you spit it out. But if you don’t know what me and us is, you can’t look at an idea and say that’s not us. One of the most precious things you could give your children is a thousand years of culture. It’s who you are and who you have been. Now I’m an Israeli Jew who firmly believes a nation can be multiracial but I’m worried about multicultural. Because culture is the single most important decider of human behavior. It’s the single most important thing to have in a cohesive country. To Westerners who have been trained by generations of elites to not know who you are because of a misunderstanding of what happened in the 20th century, because of a misunderstanding of where colonialism and WWII comes from, as thinking too much about your own culture, or thinking your culture is too good, is what caused the Holocaust, you need to step back. “Germaness” is not what caused the Holocaust - Haviv Rettig Gur nails it. Every word of this

Every time I hear the debate between English identity and multiculturalism, I’m deeply confused. Multiculturalism essentially means that “Englishness” is an empty vessel in which cultures live together, that the vessel of being a country is neutral and empty of content. There’s been an elite project in Britain, America and Canada and generally in the English speaking world, to empty identity of distinctiveness and culture and into that empty vessel, pour any old random thing. Literally any old idea unexamined. And so you now have in Britain, a very small minority of radical islamists. They are tiny. Most muslims are not radical. They are tiny, and yet they can run your streets because everybody else is an empty vessel. You look at that idea and you say that’s not me, that’s not us, and you spit it out. But if you don’t know what me and us is, you can’t look at an idea and say that’s not us. One of the most precious things you could give your children is a thousand years of culture. It’s who you are and who you have been. Now I’m an Israeli Jew who firmly believes a nation can be multiracial but I’m worried about multicultural. Because culture is the single most important decider of human behavior. It’s the single most important thing to have in a cohesive country. To Westerners who have been trained by generations of elites to not know who you are because of a misunderstanding of what happened in the 20th century, because of a misunderstanding of where colonialism and WWII comes from, as thinking too much about your own culture, or thinking your culture is too good, is what caused the Holocaust, you need to step back. “Germaness” is not what caused the Holocaust - Haviv Rettig Gur nails it. Every word of this

Melissa Chen

245,583 views • 7 months ago

Can I just put it out there to you all that the Iranian people the majority of them are highly educated smart intellectual people and the ones who are in comments of mine and other people are actually just sick individuals that are working on a plan and their plan is to swear their way and trying to intimidate and abuse social media accounts. All they’re doing is showing themselves to be nothing but uneducated scumbags that work for Israel almost all of them. I’ve got next to nothing followers as in like zero followers or three followers or four followers some of them even have a blue Tech, but they’ve got all the five followers. This is an operation that we put in place to try and take control of the narrative on social media reality on the ground in Iran. There is no willingness whatsoever for what’s happening in social media in the West. There is no one supporting these people in Iran. So whatever they wanna say and do over here means nothing to the people on their own nothing. This young lady in this video is pretty much the same person as me and the sense that she is an Iranian has not lost her sensible sense of National identity and understands what’s right and what’s wrong and if people want to take the side of Israel and fly the flag of the star of David is some kind of symbol of white nationalism Asif that’s gonna save Iran you are at your mind. Don’t worry all of this will go away hopefully the next couple of weeks with these idiots and they’ll find somewhere else to go and annoy and being a nuisance too as these bots normally are. Fuck Israel 🇮🇱

Can I just put it out there to you all that the Iranian people the majority of them are highly educated smart intellectual people and the ones who are in comments of mine and other people are actually just sick individuals that are working on a plan and their plan is to swear their way and trying to intimidate and abuse social media accounts. All they’re doing is showing themselves to be nothing but uneducated scumbags that work for Israel almost all of them. I’ve got next to nothing followers as in like zero followers or three followers or four followers some of them even have a blue Tech, but they’ve got all the five followers. This is an operation that we put in place to try and take control of the narrative on social media reality on the ground in Iran. There is no willingness whatsoever for what’s happening in social media in the West. There is no one supporting these people in Iran. So whatever they wanna say and do over here means nothing to the people on their own nothing. This young lady in this video is pretty much the same person as me and the sense that she is an Iranian has not lost her sensible sense of National identity and understands what’s right and what’s wrong and if people want to take the side of Israel and fly the flag of the star of David is some kind of symbol of white nationalism Asif that’s gonna save Iran you are at your mind. Don’t worry all of this will go away hopefully the next couple of weeks with these idiots and they’ll find somewhere else to go and annoy and being a nuisance too as these bots normally are. Fuck Israel 🇮🇱

Hussain “Hoz” Shafiei

47,559 views • 6 months ago

“Which of these people is a minority? Like most people, you'd probably say it's her, but this way of thinking, it's actually backwards” The White Girl is actually the minority “White people are barely 7% of the world's population, and even domestically in countries like America, whites are on present trends going to be a minority in a few years, but in many parts of the country they already are. Now, of course, the obvious rebuttal here is that minority is just a term we use to politely describe non-white populations, but words have power and the power of using minority to describe every other population except ourselves. That's lulling whites into a false sense of demographic security. It's why when I interviewed people in Australia, in America, or other parts of the world, many of them thought that whites were like 80% of the world's population. So obviously then this majority-minority deceit is a pivotal factor in why whites are carelessly giving away their countries, becoming an increasingly smaller demographic in the lands their ancestors built just to invite in cultures that are often openly hostile to them. And these so-called minorities, they have entire continents where they're the absolute majority culturally and ethnically, but it's seen as a problem if whites even begin to think about advocating for Western civilization to do the same.

“Which of these people is a minority? Like most people, you'd probably say it's her, but this way of thinking, it's actually backwards” The White Girl is actually the minority “White people are barely 7% of the world's population, and even domestically in countries like America, whites are on present trends going to be a minority in a few years, but in many parts of the country they already are. Now, of course, the obvious rebuttal here is that minority is just a term we use to politely describe non-white populations, but words have power and the power of using minority to describe every other population except ourselves. That's lulling whites into a false sense of demographic security. It's why when I interviewed people in Australia, in America, or other parts of the world, many of them thought that whites were like 80% of the world's population. So obviously then this majority-minority deceit is a pivotal factor in why whites are carelessly giving away their countries, becoming an increasingly smaller demographic in the lands their ancestors built just to invite in cultures that are often openly hostile to them. And these so-called minorities, they have entire continents where they're the absolute majority culturally and ethnically, but it's seen as a problem if whites even begin to think about advocating for Western civilization to do the same.

Wall Street Apes

35,326 views • 4 months ago

"I worked for the Speaker of the House. I worked for the President of the United States. One of the things you learn in those jobs is that ultimately no one is fully in charge of anything, and the world is very, very complex. I would read in the Washington Post how Republican leaders had all these plans and they were going to pull things this way or that way. And then I'd get to work and to say that no one had a plan would be a gross understatement. No one had any idea what was going to happen that afternoon. The idea that in a free society somebody is pulling the strings and someone has a nine-step plan and you're just a pawn in it is just very, very implausible. Our society doesn't really work that way. Our elites now are not ultra-competent. You can say a lot of things about them, but I would not say that we have ultra-competent leaders of any institution. I can see the appeal of wanting to believe that it's all a false flag or a plan. But when you actually see the system work—it's both good news and bad news—but nobody's in charge of everything."

"I worked for the Speaker of the House. I worked for the President of the United States. One of the things you learn in those jobs is that ultimately no one is fully in charge of anything, and the world is very, very complex. I would read in the Washington Post how Republican leaders had all these plans and they were going to pull things this way or that way. And then I'd get to work and to say that no one had a plan would be a gross understatement. No one had any idea what was going to happen that afternoon. The idea that in a free society somebody is pulling the strings and someone has a nine-step plan and you're just a pawn in it is just very, very implausible. Our society doesn't really work that way. Our elites now are not ultra-competent. You can say a lot of things about them, but I would not say that we have ultra-competent leaders of any institution. I can see the appeal of wanting to believe that it's all a false flag or a plan. But when you actually see the system work—it's both good news and bad news—but nobody's in charge of everything."

Michael Shermer

128,354 views • 2 years ago

Ilya Sutskever predicts that in the coming years—whether it’s three, five, or ten—AI will be able to do everything humans can do. He argues that since the brain is a biological computer, a digital computer should, in theory, be capable of learning and performing all the same tasks. This belief underpins his confidence in the arrival of truly general AI.

Ilya Sutskever predicts that in the coming years—whether it’s three, five, or ten—AI will be able to do everything humans can do. He argues that since the brain is a biological computer, a digital computer should, in theory, be capable of learning and performing all the same tasks. This belief underpins his confidence in the arrival of truly general AI.

Wes Roth

14,017 views • 1 year ago